Shabbat Shalom. I personally find it very eye opening when after all these years I finally read the Bible for myself. Anyone else?

@learnandteacheverything

15 күн бұрын

A lifetime of listening to a guy talk for 30-45 min once a week was all I had. Now? Wow.

@learnandteacheverything

15 күн бұрын

Eyes in your own book revival anyone? I hope so.

@babithasingh9367

15 күн бұрын

Years of going to church was actually preventing me to know the whole truth..em so glad to know the truth before I die..so I can try to keep the word of God and pray for strength to keep God's commandments..God needs to be served with gladness, with love, appreciation, gratitude..not with us always wanting and asking for ourselves..worship with Thanksgiving..this life, no matter how difficult, we were given this privilege to be part of creation..it's pretty awesome ❤️

@6969smurfy

12 күн бұрын

@babithasingh9367 I was blessed by coming to the word, With only a belief in god, And not having the man religion aspect Taught to me. I feel for ex christians, For I myself will not call myself a christian. Just a man learning scriptures. The wisdom is torah and the religion speaks against it. It's sin one of man all over again, Praise YAH firmly Worship YAH humbly Give thanks for the Messiah Halalu-YAH

It is good to know that the messianic congregation I go to is following the whole law, the Torah. The law of the cross nailed the ordinances that was against us. That is the charges that was against us. We must keep His commandments to show that we love Yeshua, and let Yeshua take care of the eternal consequences. We suffer when we break His commandments while on earth, yet He will redeem us when we continue to walk with Him by faith. Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, Shalom to all!

@6969smurfy

12 күн бұрын

Off the stone, on to thy heart Ezekiel 11 19-20 And I will give them one HEART, and a NEW SPIRIT I will put within them. I will remove the HEART of stone from their flesh and give them a HEART of flesh, that they may walk in "my statutes" and keep my rules and obey them. And they shall be my "PEOPLES", and I will be their YAH/God. Jer 31 33 But this is the COVENANT that I will make with the HOUSE of ISRAEL after those days, declares the Adonai/Lord: I will put my TORAH within them, and I will write it on their HEARTS. And I will be their YAH/God, and they shall be MY PEOPLES ie YAHisrael. Hebrews 8 7-13 Hebrews 10 16 This is the COVENANT I will make with them after that time, says the Adonai/Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their MINDS.”

Shabbat Shalom! Glory to The Holy One of Israel!!!

So. We have mankind. Again. Trying to make excuses for why they do not have to obey the whole Word of God. Praying Yeshua returns quickly so HE can set everything and everyone straight! Save us from ourselves!

With respect this is not an issue I have spent a lot of time investigating. However, this video has gone some way to convince me this claim has genuine validity.

I appreciate your teaching, as always. Thank you for your clear and concise approach.

SHABBAT SHALOM 🙌🏽

It seems people will do anything to have a reason to not keep the Torah.

@MK4Hisglory

14 күн бұрын

@@Alleycatthegadite you really shouldn’t make comments such as this in ignorance. Rather maybe seek WHY there are people who make a distinction between the two before you make silly false statements as above. It in no way negates torah, nor do we NOT follow torah. You don’t understand of what you speak, neither does 119 for that matter.

@motherbear5091

12 күн бұрын

@@MK4Hisgloryso, I ask you then . Why do you make the distinction?

@MK4Hisglory

12 күн бұрын

@@motherbear5091 because I see the distinction between the two in scripture.

@motherbear5091

12 күн бұрын

@@MK4HisgloryScripture verses?

@MK4Hisglory

12 күн бұрын

@@motherbear5091 Exodus 19:4-6 “‘You have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles’ wings and brought you to Myself. Now therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a special treasure to Me above all people; for all the earth is Mine. And you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’ These are the words which you shall speak to the children of Israel.”” ‭ Above clearly shows that Yah desired obedience to His commands and if obeyed they would be a holy nation and ALL a kingdom of priests, not just the Levites. Deuteronomy‬ ‭4‬:‭13‬ “So He declared to you His covenant which He commanded you to perform, the Ten Commandments; and He wrote them on two tablets of stone.” ‭‭ What was covenant??? The 10 commandments, not sacrificial system. Deuteronomy‬ ‭5‬:‭22‬ “These words Yahuah spoke to all your assembly, in the mountain from the midst of the fire, the cloud, and the thick darkness, with a loud voice; AND HE ADDED NO MORE. And He wrote them on two tablets of stone and gave them to me.” ‭‭ Yah gave them the 10 and He added no more….not until He added the law of sin and death because of transgression (Gal 3:19). Deuteronomy‬ ‭31‬:‭24‬-‭26‬ “So it was, when Moses had completed writing the words of this law in a book, when they were finished, that Moses commanded the Levites, who bore the ark of the covenant of Yahuah, saying: “Take this Book of the Law, and put it beside the ark of the covenant of the Yahuah your Elohiym, that it may be there as a witness against you;” ‭‭ The book of the law was written by the hand of Moses, and placed on the side of the ark as a witness against them. The 10 commandments were written by the finger of Yah and placed inside the ark because it was covenant. Psalm 40:6 “Sacrifice and offering You did not desire; My ears You have opened. Burnt offering and sin offering You did not require.” Jeremiah 7:22 “For I did not speak to your fathers, or command them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices. But this is what I commanded them, saying, ‘Obey My voice, and I will be your God, and you shall be My people. And walk in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well with you.’” ‭ ‭When Yah proposed covenant to Israel in Exodus 19 there were no curses or sin offerings attached to it. He just wanted their hearts. Because they broke covenant by making golden calf, He gave them the sacrificial system under Aaronic priesthood as a tutor. ‭‭Hosea‬ ‭6‬:‭6‬-‭7‬ “For I desire mercy and not sacrifice, And the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings. “But like men they transgressed the covenant; There they dealt treacherously with Me.” Ezekiel 20:25 “Therefore I also gave them up to statutes that were not good, and judgments by which they could not live;” ‭ We know that the law is good, holy and just so what were the statutes that Yah gave them over to that were NOT good?? The priesthood/sacrificial system. I would strongly recommend that you read whole chapters for context. Also, the entire book of Hebrews is a compare and contrast of the levitical priesthood, its obsolescence and why the melchidezek priesthood with Yahusha as High Priest is superior in every way. “For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law.” ‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭7‬:‭12‬ “For the law of the Spirit of life in Messiah Yahusha has made me free from the law of sin and death.” ‭‭Romans‬ ‭8‬:‭2‬. The law of the Spirit of life in Messiah is covenant torah, the 10 commandments). The law of sin and death was placed on the side of the ark - it’s the sacrificial/levitical system. Paul is clearly making a distinction here as he does in many other places. What then was nailed to the tree in Col 2:14, and Eph 2:15? We know it was not Yah’s commandments. It also wasn’t “oral torah” as so many in this movement like to suggest. Whatever oral traditions there were, were man made, not from Yah, therefore they never stood against us. It was the book of law that was added because of transgression until the Seed of Promise should come (Gal 3). We know Noah, Abraham, Isaac etc. were in faith and obeying Yah’s commands. See Gen 7 (Noah knew what animals were clean/unclean); Gen 18:19 and 26:5 indicate Abraham was walking in Yah’s commandments, yet there was no priesthood nor sacrifice for sin. Hmmm…

These people are twisted, they claim clean/unclean are not for us yet in Genesis 7 clean/unclean were mentioned. Good truth.

@tylerchurch6945

15 күн бұрын

Completely out of context my brother in Messiah Yeshua as I’m correcting you that Genesis 7 tells about how there were 7 pairs of clean animals and 2 unclean animals. Not two of everything was in the boat. God knows the purpose of these unclean animals and they are scavengers. God put them here to test our loyalty towards Yahweh.

@MK4Hisglory

15 күн бұрын

Being one of “these people” as you call us, we do adhere to the dietary laws because it precedes the book of the law.

@tylerchurch6945

15 күн бұрын

@@MK4Hisglory exactly amen there is no difference in the book of law and covenant all of it is just the Torah

@MK4Hisglory

15 күн бұрын

@@tylerchurch6945 I will wholeheartedly disagree with your statement.

@tylerchurch6945

15 күн бұрын

@@MK4Hisglory and why do you disagree? Just my question?

Shabbat shalom shalom. I definitely have been blessed by this teaching. Thank you very much for your service! I'm studying the Torah for several months now, slowly getting a glimpse of it's logic which differs very much from our Greek influenced logic. And I appreciate very much you disdaining from dispensationalism which i detect in evangelical eschatology everywhere. Even so among messianic circles. Perhaps this could be another topic you can pick up: "the day of the lord" in the OT😊

Yeshua didn't abolish the Law, He provided a way for man to fulfill the Law through His righteousness, which has been imputed to believers when we repent of our sins.

@verdadabsoluta9756

15 күн бұрын

That's the good news of the gospel! Power to overcome sin through Christ!

@user-ke6cx8ms3y

15 күн бұрын

I looked out my door: Guess what?? I saw that the HEAVENS & EARTH WAS STILL IN TACK, SO YASHUA DIDN'T ABOISH THE TORAH,

@theeternalsbeliever1779

15 күн бұрын

This is also wrong. Matt. 5:18-20 shows Christ putting the responsibility squarely on the individual follower to do what He did in obeying His Father's laws. This is repeated in Christ's messages to the church eras where He tells them to overcome Satan like He did. He didn't say "I overcame Satan so I could transfer My righteousness to you by osmosis". That's not in the Bible anywhere.

Shabbat Shalom, great job as usual

The same who gave the commandments at Sinai is The same that died on the wood for humanity,,,HE doesn't change.HIS commandments don't change

@richardtarr8145

15 күн бұрын

God died?

@bawbjusbawb6471

15 күн бұрын

@@richardtarr8145 Do you want to understand or do you want to argue your point? It will determine how this exchange progresses...

@richardtarr8145

15 күн бұрын

@@bawbjusbawb6471 Neither. Thanks.

@reomartin9401

15 күн бұрын

@@richardtarr8145 HIS son died!!don't you know??

@reomartin9401

15 күн бұрын

@@richardtarr8145 The one who gave the commands at Sinai was Messiah!!

John, thank you for this teaching.

Great timing. I just had a discussion with those who teach this in the SDA church.

@iguanapoolservice1461

15 күн бұрын

The IJ is what you guys should get rid of.

@NANA-fh6we

15 күн бұрын

@@iguanapoolservice1461 What is the IJ?

@nickeleye7607

15 күн бұрын

​@@NANA-fh6weinvestigative judgement doctrine of Ellen G. White

@NANA-fh6we

15 күн бұрын

@@nickeleye7607 Thanks. I’ve never heard of that. I think the person replying mistook me for an SDA member

@scottandchels6813

15 күн бұрын

I bet you got real far on that lol. In my experience they never take on board and just ignore the subject until you go awAy. Have you read their book 'The Ten Commandments, twice Removed' ? It's a small book which has a dedicated to God law blessed, Moses Law curses, etc, etc.

This is an old teaching but while watching this time I had the thought in Hebrews it talks about the priesthood and the things on earth being a shadow of the heavenly priesthood and tabernacle. So doesn't that affirm what 119 ministries is saying, the priesthood was given to Aaron and shadows the heavenly.

Shalawam. Interesting video. I agree that there is no distinction made between the two. Yahuah's law has always been in place. We see examples of the Levitical law in effect immediately after the fall in the garden (if the law was not already in place, how would Cain and Abel have known how and what was an acceptable offering to YAH?). We can also look at Abraham tithing to Melchizedek (Yahusha). It is not until Hebrews 7 that we understand that the Levitical order is an amendment to the law. Our high priest under the new covenant (Yahusha) is the same as our high priest before the law was written on stone tablets at Sinai. Melchizedek is a title, not a name. This was Abraham tithing to Yahusha and proparing the way for the Levitical Priesthood. Understanding Melchizedek is the lynch pin between the old and new testiments. Shalawam...

Shabbat Shalom!! I heard a similar teaching from a brother that follows Torah and is a strong defender of the Way (including dietary laws and feasts being for us today). He did not include any of these other arguments mentioned in your video but was also in reference to Galatians 3 and just making a distinction between the eternal Covenant vs “The Book of the Law”. These were 2 convincing scriptures in Deuteronomy he used to illustrate this. ““These words the Lord spoke to all your assembly at the mountain out of the midst of the fire, the cloud, and the thick darkness, with a loud voice; and he added no more. And he wrote them on two tablets of stone and gave them to me.” ‭‭Deuteronomy‬ ‭5‬:‭22‬ ‭ESV‬‬ “Moses commanded the Levites who carried the ark of the covenant of the Lord, “Take this Book of the Law and put it by the side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there for a witness against you.” ‭‭Deuteronomy‬ ‭31‬:‭25‬-‭26‬ ‭ESV‬‬

@MK4Hisglory

15 күн бұрын

Yes, as someone who adheres to this Biblical understanding of a distinction between Yah’s commandments/dietary laws and the laws added because of transgression, this entire video makes utterly false claims. 119 ministries should really have a proper understanding of what we profess before putting something like this out.

I've never heard this particular argument before. When the law is spoken of favorably I take as referring to the commandments, and when it spoken of negatively I take it as referring to the curse. What confuses matters is that the curses are also commandments.

Toda

Great teaching! I think I will just respond with this. Where do the two greatest commands come from?

Shabbat Shalom.

Good stuff. 2 Kings 23:21 further makes the point...

The BOOK OF THE COVENANT Is the Fulfillment of THE BOOK OF THE LAW. Both are Important.

@6969smurfy

17 күн бұрын

The word law is fodder for the enemy.. it helps reborns to speak TORAH . Baby Steps.

@ICU2B4UDO

16 күн бұрын

They're the Same Book...

@Owfjajae

15 күн бұрын

CAN YOU SHARE SCRIPTURE?

@6969smurfy

12 күн бұрын

@Owfjajae Ezekiel 11 19-20 And I will give them one HEART, and a NEW SPIRIT I will put within them. I will remove the HEART of stone from their flesh and give them a HEART of flesh, that they may walk in "my statutes" and keep my rules and obey them. And they shall be my "PEOPLES", and I will be their YAH/God. Jer 31 33 But this is the COVENANT that I will make with the HOUSE of ISRAEL after those days, declares the Adonai/Lord: I will put my TORAH within them, and I will write it on their HEARTS. And I will be their YAH/God, and they shall be MY PEOPLES ie YAHisrael. Hebrews 8 7-13 Hebrews 10 16 This is the COVENANT I will make with them after that time, says the Adonai/Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their MINDS.”

Yes, I did speak out of turn and I apologize.

Amen🙏

Amein. The Law is the Covenant through Messiah Yahushua!! HalleluYah. Shabbat Shalom.

“These are the words of the covenant, which the LORD commanded Moses to make with the children of Israel in the land of Moab, beside the covenant which he made with them in Horeb.” ‭‭Deuteronomy‬ ‭29‬:‭1‬ ‭

@6969smurfy

12 күн бұрын

@SpiritofTruth.Remnant Ezekiel 11 19-20 And I will give them one HEART, and a NEW SPIRIT I will put within them. I will remove the HEART of stone from their flesh and give them a HEART of flesh, that they may walk in "my statutes" and keep my rules and obey them. And they shall be my "PEOPLES", and I will be their YAH/God. Jer 31 33 But this is the COVENANT that I will make with the HOUSE of ISRAEL after those days, declares the Adonai/Lord: I will put my TORAH within them, and I will write it on their HEARTS. And I will be their YAH/God, and they shall be MY PEOPLES ie YAHisrael. Hebrews 8 7-13 Hebrews 10 16 This is the COVENANT I will make with them after that time, says the Adonai/Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their MINDS.”

Excellent… just a reminder.. the word “ receives” is misspelled at 17:00 minute mark. Suggest a better proofreading program! Shalom!

@Redhawkeye

15 күн бұрын

15:00 minute mark also

In Matthew Nolan's response to this redone video (5 years ago), he asked (in reference to Exodus 16:34 and the Exodus chronology): "There's a problem. How could you put the manna in the Ark of the Testimony if it hadn't been built until Exodus 25?" However, in Exodus 16:34 Moses did not command Aaron to place the jar of manna inside the Ark. Aaron was commanded to place it "before" the Testimony. The command to build the Ark came in Exodus 25 so that the Testimony could be placed inside it. So chronologically, the Testimony predated the jar of manna, and the jar of manna predated the Ark. It's just that simple. On a side note, the Hebrew word for "Testimony" can refer to God's words, the Tabernacle, or the Ark. To place the jar "before" the Testimony indicates a spatial relationship, such as "to", "toward", "in front of", etc. Since the Testimony itself is not a container (like the Ark), one could not put the jar "inside" the Testimony. In fact, where Moses is commanded to put the Testimony "into" the Ark, this is a different Hebrew word altogether. This is a great example of how Nolan reads things into the details of the text (which turn out to be false) and eventually comes up with a new teaching that raises eyebrows. That is harsh: but if he is wrong about a premise, then his conclusion is probably false too. Test EVERYTHING.

@MK4Hisglory

14 күн бұрын

Maybe you should test the dichotomy a bit more before making such comments? He doesn't read into anything and is the first to say that the book of Exodus is not chronological. Through the example you gave above, you actually prove the point that it is indeed not chronological. 2ndly, your argument of spatial relationship is moot, because when you look up the phrase "in the side" referring to Deuteronomy 31:24 in a concordance, it means exactly that; the side or beside. Setting the book of Exodus aside, there are still many other Biblical proofs that make the distinction between covenant torah and the sacrificial system imposed for sin (the law of sin and death) until the Seed of promise came. Study if you care to the following: Ezekiel 20:25; reading the whole chapter for context. Deut 4:13; 5:6-22 (emphasis on v22) and 31:24-26, Jere 7:22; Psalm 40:6-8; Hosea 6:6. Did Yahusha exalt His Father's commands while here or the sacrificial system imposed because they broke covenant with a golden calf? Do those in Rev 22:14 who get to eat of the tree of life and enter to city do so because they followed the commandments/dietary laws or because they wore tzitzit and had a beard?? “For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law.” ‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭7‬:‭12‬

@XavierPutnam

13 күн бұрын

@@MK4Hisglory ”Yahusha” is a modern fabricated word that doesn’t exist in scripture at all.

Wouldnt a distinction be made when Moses goes BACK up on the mountain again and bring down another book? Wouldn’t a distinction also be made that the book of the covenant was placed inside the ark and the book of the law placed outside the ark as a witness against them?

@MK4Hisglory

12 күн бұрын

Yes! That's the point! There is a distinction between the 2, yet those who understand that are not obeying Torah according to this video. It's ridiculous!

Is this a newer video with a similar claim made about 5 years ago or same video just re-upload? The date says 1 day ago. Funny how actual dates of videos made are NOT in the header or more info.

It is clear the priesthood of Isreal became wickedly corrupt and altered / added to the law of Moses (which is the genuine law of YHVH). This is the universal and consistent message of the Hebrew bible and is affirmed by the consistent teaching of Yeshua. The sacrificial system for the forgiveness of sin is the most obvious example of this. What indeed made John the Baptist so important and how did he prepare the way for the anointed one? He taught people that forgiveness of sins never required anyone to slaughter an animal. Rather a repentant heart, a change of behaviour accompanied by mikvah (baptism) was all that was required.

They are One and the Same, Exodus 20 - Deuteronomy 34. And most don't capture the understanding of the Levite Tribe and the Zadok Priesthood.

Why is it that the dates for celebrating the Feast days are happening over a period of several weeks or months?

@barbaramahan364

15 күн бұрын

Here's how I answered that for my sister. Get a piece of paper and draw out the feast days on a line. The Gospel is laid out in the feast days. I believe these guys have a teaching on them.

@theeternalsbeliever1779

15 күн бұрын

God designed the placement of the annual festivals to where they would revolve around the 2 harvest periods that Israel experienced. This was further meant to convey the message that contrary what "Christianity" believes, God hasn't spent all of human history locked in a cosmic tug of war with Satan. There is a small harvest period in the spring period(God's Church), and then the larger harvest in the fall period(the ppl converted after Christ returns).

I never heard that teaching before but coming to understand by just reading God's word the book of the law is the blessings and curses the added Covenant Deuteronomy 29:1 the law of the curses which makes Galatians make sense and most of the New Testament which at the end of Joshua chapter 8 he wrote the book of the law on the rocks the blessing and the curses correct me if I'm wrong

Clear distinction between the Law of God and the Law of Moses…Israel transgressed the Law of God so the curses mentioned in the Law of Moses came upon them read…Daniel 9:11 “Yes, all Israel has transgressed Your law, even turning aside that they might not obey Your voice. Therefore the curse has been poured out on us and the oath that is written in the Law of Moses the servant of God, because we have sinned against Him. Shalom

Wait The Book of The Law was NOT added as a punishment bc there is blessings and curses when you obeyed or disobeyed. I haven't heard TTTT or others teach TBOTL was punishment nor do they attack Yahs laws. They distinguish between the two laws only as it pertains to the administration (The Set Apart Spirit) of the book of the law vs the book of the covenant. T4 does NOT teach against the book of the law. Also The book of the law has many of the commands in the book of the covenant and T4s view it's because Israel needed a tutor on how to obey the laws. Which later Paul says is NO longer needed. T4 teaches it this way. Why was the book of the law put on the outside the ark as a witness if it wasn't to imposed as a tutor? Ww know beccause of transgressions right? We don't stone people or kill when they break the law today correct? This is how the law was administered then, which does not apply after Messiah.

The extent The Enemy will go to negate God’s Word sometimes surprises me and this is one of those times. I’ve never heard anyone espouse this IMO insane theory before. Are there any mainstream theologians who promote this dichotomy? I suspect it’s more dispensational fringe “pastors”. 2 Ptr 3:16

Then how do you explain that the Ten Commandments were placed inside the ark and the ordinances were placed separately on the side of the ark. Two different books , placed in two different locations.

Shabbath Shalom! There are SDA here?

@6969smurfy

12 күн бұрын

@erncrediblestories6259 I don't know, but shabbat Shalom anyways. Or belatedly anyways.

4:50 that's close, but incorrect. The "written" law was never intended, so the "book of the covenant" was also a result of disobedience.

It's not the Book of the Law that the NT is addressing when negative comments are given about it. It is the oral law that the NT is addressing when negative comments are given about it. No one in the entire Bible disparages God's law. They disparage and speak negatively about rabbinical law (man-made law). Your argument that Yah established the priesthood before the golden calf and that means the priesthood was not as a result of the golden calf sin, does not necessarily mean that. Yah put in place a system that would address what was going to happen just like He put in place from creation the very day the Messiah would be born to address sin. He did both before the need even arose. Doesn't Hebrews 7-9 talk about the priesthood being inferior and only a shadow that will soon pass away? What was it a shadow for? Therefore, we can believe the priesthood only pointed to something that was going to happen. Meaning, the priesthood was a foreshadow of what our Messiah would do which was to be a mediator between man and God and to deal with sin. Therefore, logic dictates that sin is the cause of the need of the mediator.......sin is the cause of the need of the priesthood (shadow) and the Messiah (reality). However, even this understanding does not separate the Book of the Covenant and Book of the Law into two different things therefore allowing people to ignore commands.

@MK4Hisglory

15 күн бұрын

Excuse me, but manmade “oral Torah” never stood against man. Yah’s laws added because of transgression however did until the Seed of Promise should come.

@bmjjjja

14 күн бұрын

@@MK4Hisglory wrong, man-made oral torah is sin. Sin stands against man, not righteousness. Torah is: "light" "life" "sweeter than honey" "the way" "truth" "not difficult" "not burdensome" "liberty" "better than gold or silver" "my delight" "faithful" "righteous" "the rejoicing of my heart" "wonderful" "above fine gold" "endures forever" "perfect" "converting the soul" "pure" "enlightening the eyes" "eternal" .......... Col 2:13 When you were dead in your SINS and in the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our SINS, 14 having canceled the charge of our legal indebtedness, which stood against us and condemned us; he has taken it away, nailing it to the cross. 22 These rules, which have to do with things that are all destined to perish with use, are based on MERELY HUMAN COMMANDS AND TEACHINGS. SINS- legal indebtedness. SINS- stand against us. SINS- condemn us. SINS-following rabbinical (MAN-MADE) laws that are based on HUMAN rules/teachings that are destined to perish. (Torah laws are eternal!). SINS-nailed to the cross. Obeying Torah is not sin, breaking Torah is sin. Following man-made laws are all throughout the NT and it is sin to follow them. That's why Yeshua broke those laws all the time. Examples of man-made rabbinical laws: hand-washing ritual, declaring healing to be work, sabbath day's walk, declaring that nothing can be picked up/carried on Sabbath, preparation day, declaring that picking heads of grain to eat is work, brit periah, fasting from meat, etc etc

@MK4Hisglory

14 күн бұрын

@@bmjjjja did you read your response before you sent it?? I quote, “wrong, man-made torah is sin.” What??? Makes no sense. Next you posted Col 2:14 then skipped a whole bunch of verses and posted v22 as if they are speaking of the same thing which they are not! You cannot cherry pick verses and take them out of context like that to fit your narrative. The handwriting against us is what Yahuah imposed. Yah would not hold oral torah which was manmade against us. Oral torah didn’t exist until after babylon when the pharisees came on the scene. Oral torah was then said to be passed down from Moses as an excuse for them to impose their interpretation of Yah’s laws. All lies!!! What was placed on the outside of the ark (deut 31:24-26) is what stood against us…there was no oral torah then. Let’s think instead of being indoctrinated. Where did you even get that definition for sin??? Some talmudic rabbinic dictionary? If sin were really nailed to the cross why do we still sin then?? Gal 3:19-20: What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of mediator. Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one. Nothing to do with pharisaic oral torah.

@bmjjjja

13 күн бұрын

@@MK4Hisglory Ok, I'll go slower. You're wrong. The oral Torah is sin because it is made up by man. This includes any/all rabbinical laws, man-made or "merely human rules." No, I did not skip verses that change the subject. The whole 2nd chapter of Colossians is about the same thing; sin. In this case, the sin mentioned is "mere human rules" "destined to perish" "nailed to the cross" "stand against us (because sin stands against us)" "having only the appearance of wisdom" "hollow and deceptive philosophy" "depends on human traditions" makes one "legally indebted (to obey rabbinical laws)" "self ruled" "of the flesh" "lacks any value." None of those describe Torah. The reason this chapter is about SIN (God's Torah is not sin) is because in Torah, it says we are forbidden to add to or subtract from His law with our own (Deut 4:2) Oral laws have been around for ages; especially clear in the NT. A handwashing ritual in Matt 15, a sabbath day's walk, considering healing to be "work" and therefore violating Sabbath, same with picking heads of grain to be considered "work" and violating Sabbath, preparation day, carrying your mat considered "work" and therefore violating Sabbath. All of these rules which were very alive and well and going on in the NT that our Messiah broke all the time, are not Torah laws but rabbinical made up laws. They added to Torah. That's why He broke them. He never broke a Torah law or He would not be Messiah. Read Gal 3:10. There is the "law" (lower case L) that is being contrasted with the "Book of the Law" (upper case). In that passage alone, Torah is referred to 4 times as the standard to obey. Yet there is a "law" that is in violation of Torah and brings a curse. That law is rabbinical law and we know this because it is a "different gospel which is no gospel at all." Specifically, that law being talked about and the reason for this letter happens to be brit periah. Look it up. It's why Titus refused. It's man-made as opposed to Brit Milah which is what God said to do and what Timothy did.

@MK4Hisglory

13 күн бұрын

@@bmjjjja No need to get snarky…your first response was not coherent. And you’re still missing my point. I’m well aware of what the oral traditions are, but you are incorrect in saying that those are what got nailed to the tree. I’m also aware these are what they accused Messiah of breaking and that yes, He did not break Yahuah’s actual torah or He would not be able to be Messiah. That said let’s think, if they were manmade traditions that Messiah broke for that very reason, then they did not stand against us in Yah’s eyes and were therefore NOT what was nailed to the tree. We were never indebted, as your wonderful definition says, to follow manmade traditions, especially as people grafted in to Israel. You’re also glossing over the fact that oral traditions did not exist until after their time in Babylon. The definition of sin according to 1 John 3:4 is transgression of the torah, Yah’s torah, not oral traditions. The demands and written requirements of the levitical sacrificial system imposed as a curse for breaking covenant with Yah is what stood against us and thus what was nailed to the tree. Col 2:13-14, “And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.” Look at v13, “having forgiven you all trespasses…” If Yahusha didn’t break torah when He broke “pharisee interpretation” of it, then neither did we!!! He forgave trespasses committed against His requirements under the sacrificial system. You are a walking contradiction! And no, Col chapter 2 is not entirely about sin - you “glued” verses together to make it support your argument. Paul weaves through various subjects within the chapter, v13-14 are not connected to v22.

Another point to show they just grabbing at straw, they don't keep the sabbath or pesach!!

If you read the bible for yourself, From Genesis to Revelation, and will not seek any opinions from any preachers, you will be convicted to follow the Law. A sin is a sin, they have sinned back then and we are still sinning today. Why would YHWH punish people and send prophets? To put the people back on the staright and narrow path, rings a bell? If you only read Messiah's words, you will never even think about that the Law is done away with, actually he upholds and stresses the importance of it. Takes it to another level.

4Therefore, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God. 5For when we lived according to the flesh, the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in our bodies, bearing fruit for death. 6But now, having died to what bound us, we have been released from the law, so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code. (Romans 7:4-6)

Good teaching, but this is not a recent phenomenon. I been hearing this nonsense for 20 years.

Well; WHO exactly begged for the calf? Was it the Israelites? or was it the Egyptian Sojourners among them? I mean think about it; YHWH and Moses were up on the mountain, where it was covered in smoke and lightning and thunder........ as obvious signs of God's presence. OK? Just how rebellious would the Abrahamites have to be, to beg for an idol, while at the foot of all those goings on, after having just been led thru the wilderness for 40 years? Hmmm

And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child. And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent. And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. Revelation:12:13-17

@ajforms4818

14 күн бұрын

This is a pivotal passage. We all need to understand it, to escape the Tribulation.

Always Paul being divisive..ALWAYS PAUL

@advex4428

15 күн бұрын

And Peter for saying Paul is hard to understand. And Luke for giving weight to Paul in Acts. Just not your added books.

@cephas-pi7vc

15 күн бұрын

@@advex4428Hard for those who don’t know Torah to understand and go into the error of torahlessness. Not hard for those who know the Torah and deny Saul. You people never address the elephant in the room which is why are people when they learn more Torah in much more detail then turn on Saul, because he fails the test of Deuteronomy 13. Peter was not endorsing Saul he was warning about him with feint praise and The Book of Acts is nothing more than a legal document.

Doesn't make sense..."through angels through an intermediary". Paul is confusing.

@learnandteacheverything

15 күн бұрын

@TheShutterbug1968 Saul of tarsus is very hard to completely understand. He is so learned in the torah and highly educated that his approach to these matters are so deep that if you don't fully know where he is in his knowledge surpasses most of us

@TheShutterbug1968

15 күн бұрын

@@learnandteacheverything I completely disagree. Jesus warned about Paul and not to follow such a person. Yet so many explain him away when he contradicts Jesus.

@bont7948

15 күн бұрын

@@TheShutterbug1968oh wow so you’re saying Paul is a false prophet? 😬 😞 🙏

@TheShutterbug1968

14 күн бұрын

@@bont7948 absolutley.

@bont7948

14 күн бұрын

@@TheShutterbug1968 I’m sorry to hear that

When you start loving יהוה with all your heart; there isn’t any room left for a messiah. אני אוהב יהוה בכל לבבי, אין כמוהו

@user-ke6cx8ms3y

15 күн бұрын

YASHUAH is YAHOVAH the MESSIAH ( YASHUAH ( HE IS THE WORDS OF YAHOVAH IN THE FEASH) The older book of scriptures is all about the MESSIAH.

@sherrydubois6164

14 күн бұрын

@DanaAdams-bc5ug Yahusha said several times, 'I and The Father are one'. Shema Israel.

@DanaAdams-bc5ug

14 күн бұрын

@@sherrydubois6164 have you ever done any textual criticism? Looking at the changes in the text from the 4th century to the modern text we have now. The story of the woman taken in adultery wasn’t in the earliest manuscripts. Neither was the entire chapter of John 21. The last 12 verses in the book of mark are not in the earliest manuscripts either. יהוה is more than enough. A messiah isn’t required to love יהוה with all your heart and he loves me as well

@DanaAdams-bc5ug

14 күн бұрын

@@user-ke6cx8ms3y I respectfully disagree. Messiah means anointed. If he needed to be anointed then he is not the anointer.

Our Heavenly Father called fallen angels false gods in his commandments and there is a pads with wings section of his discipline implemented between all relationships and a reminder that we are not suppose to entwine with angels of angelic birds including these ones 👽🛸🍎 of the pads without wings section and the nutty cupids games between sex trafficking.

This came at the right time. Matthew Nolan is a very convincing teacher, and has led many astray .I was one but with the help of a couple good, sharp men in the Scriptures, help me to to backoff from Matthew Nolan. He's a person how could deceive the very elect.

@kennethreese8874

16 күн бұрын

Could he be wrong concerning the BOL vs BOC, sure. However I’ve seen none of his teachings that would suggest he would deceive the elect. There is no need to slander Him for an error.

@MK4Hisglory

15 күн бұрын

Matthew is a brilliant teacher and not the only one with this understanding. You should have care how you speak when you don’t have all the facts.

@markdlt2989

14 күн бұрын

Casting stones are we? Yeah I'm sure Yahusha would be proud of you.

@XavierPutnam

13 күн бұрын

@@markdlt2989 Yahusha is a modern fabricated word that doesn’t exist in scripture. It’s “Yeshua.”

You have great presentation skills, voice, and depictions. However, you lost me in your teaching at the beginning of the video until 10 min later. Then, as you introduced some precepts I stuck around. But even 15 min through the video, I still was confused. I believe that instead of all your fancy great graphics you should show the Bible verses with larger font, then stay on that verse to break it down word by word. See Prophecy ministries with Pastor Prophet or David Carrico with his Doctrine of Christ to see what I mean. I'm sure your channel has great knowledge but I feel it's devoid of the power of letting the Bible speak

The covenant which came through Moses with contractual clauses of the letter written on stone is completely different to the covenant which hascome through Jeshua. The saints under the old covenant through Moses expressed their faith through obedience to the law they were given. While the sai ts in the new covenant express their faith through obedience to the Spirit who has come to dwell in the hearts who believe. The law given to Israel through Moses pointed to and has been fulfilled by Jeshua to the extent of every jot and tittle. It has been fulfilled by the giving of the Holy Spirit who us to guide, reveal, comfort and empower to accomplish the new life which is the grace of God to the world. When are going to understand the gospel?

THE BOOK OF THE COVENANT ARE ALL THOSE STATUTES THAT MOSES RECEIVED FROM GOD TO GIVE THE PEOPLE , BECAUSE THEY WERE AFRAID TO HEAR IT FROM THE GOD OF ISRAEL AT HOREB , WHEN HE GAVE THEM THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ( EXODUS 20:1-19 ) . EXODUS 24:1-8 , 1.And he said unto Moses, Come up unto the LORD, thou, and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel; and worship ye afar off. 2And Moses alone shall come near the LORD: but they shall not come nigh; neither shall the people go up with him. 3And Moses came and told the people all the words of the LORD, and all the judgments: and all the people answered with one voice, and said, All the words which the LORD hath said will we do. 4And Moses wrote all the words of the LORD, and rose up early in the morning, and builded an altar under the hill, and twelve pillars, according to the twelve tribes of Israel. 5And he sent young men of the children of Israel, which offered burnt offerings, and sacrificed peace offerings of oxen unto the LORD. 6And Moses took half of the blood, and put it in basons; and half of the blood he sprinkled on the altar. 7And he took the book of the covenant, and read in the audience of the people: and they said, All that the LORD hath said will we do, and be obedient. 8And Moses took the blood, and sprinkled it on the people, and said, Behold the blood of the covenant, which the LORD hath made with you concerning all these words. THE LEVITICUS PRIESTHOOD WAS PART OF THE COVENANT , BUT NOT FOR SIN ; THEY WERE TO MINISTER THE SERVICES OF THE GOD OF ISRAEL TO THE PEOPLE . THE LAW OF ANIMAL SACRIFICE & OBLATIONS WERE FOR FREE WILL OFFERINGS & PURIFICATION , NOT FOR SIN ; WHICH WAS ADDED BECAUSE OF TRANSGRESSION ( GALATIANS 3:19 ) . WHEN THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL FIRST WENT INTO THE COVENANT WITH THE GOD OF ISRAEL , ALL OF THEIR SINS THAT THEY HAD COMMITTED WERE FORGIVEN THROUGH THE PRIESTHOOD OF FAITH ( MELCHISEDEC ) , WHEN THE PEOPLE SAID : " ALL THAT THE LORD HAST SAID WILL WE DO , AND BE OBEDIENT " : THE ONLY SIN THAT REMAINED WAS THE SIN THAT ADAM PUT HIMSELF , AND ALL OF HIS SEED UNDER , THE SIN OF THE GRAVE ; WHICH WOULD BE PAID BY CHRIST , WHEN HE CAME IN THE FLESH . THE BOOK OF THE LAW WAS GIVEN TO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL , WHEN THEY STARTED BREAKING THE COVENANT AND NOT REPENTING BY FAITH ( LIKE KING DAVID ) , HE ADDED SIN TO THE ANIMAL SACRIFICE & OBLATIONS THROUGH THEIR EARTHLY HUSBAND MOSES ; WHICH WAS TO PROTECT OR ATONE THEIR FLESH/BODY , TO KEEP GOD FROM KILLING THEM ( THE WAGES OF SIN IS DEATH ) , HOPING THAT THEY WOULD REPENT BY FAITH BEFORE THEY DIE , OR THEY WOULD DIE IN THEIR SINS . THIS LAW FOR SIN WAS CALLED ( LAW OF ANIMAL SACRIFICE & OBLATION FOR SIN , LAW OF WORKS , CIRCUMCISION OF FLESH/BODY FOR SIN , SCHOOLMASTER , WHOLE LAW , LAW OF SIN & DEATH , LAW OF MOSES ) , BECAUSE IT COMES UNDER THE EARTHLY HUSBAND/MEDIATOR PROTECTION . THIS LAW WAS OF WORKS , NOT FAITH ( REPENTING & BELIEVING THE GOSPEL ) . IN THE BOOK OF THE LAW ( LEVITICUS ) , THE LEVITICUS PRIESTS MINISTERED THE ATONEMENT FOR THE FLESH/BODY ; FOR THE PEOPLE WHO TRANSGRESSED THE LAW OF THE COVENANT , THROUGH THE PROTECTION OF ANIMAL SACRIFICE & OBLATIONS ; BUT IT COULD NOT FORGIVE THE SIN OF THE HEART/SPIRIT ; WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE ACCEPTED BY GOD ; ALSO SOME JUDGMENTS AGAINST VIOLATION THE LAW OF THE COVENANT , IT COULD NOT PROTECT YOUR FLESH/BODY FROM ; MAN PICKING UP STICKS ON THE SABBATH ; WHICH THE JUDGMENT WAS DEATH . THIS LAW MUST BE CARRIED OUT JUST AS IT WAS WRITTEN , WITH NO MERCY OR GRACE . SHALOM !