This video brought to you in part by our Patrons over on Patreon. If you’d like to support our efforts here directly, and our continued efforts to improve our videos, as well as do more ultra in-depth long form videos that built in ads and even sponsors don’t always cover fully, check out our Patreon page and perks here: www.patreon.com/TodayIFoundOut And as ever, thanks for watching!

@Maven0666

Ай бұрын

This submarine/train contraption sounds ridiculous!

75% safe is ok when it doesn't involve me flying or being hundreds of feet under the water.

@4-Methylaminorex

2 ай бұрын

Percentages are very important. Research has shown that once more than 10 percent of your neighbors are Black, the value of your home declines. As the percentage of Black neighbors increases, the property’s value plummets even further

@bannankev

2 ай бұрын

Or you are racist and don’t like black people.

@addicted2caffeine

2 ай бұрын

@@4-Methylaminorex this is incorrect the % of black neighbours doesn't decrease the value of a home. What the study you are referring to said was that areas of similar properties had a clear disproportionate price range, the homes and neighbouring properties in black communities were cheaper. Not that the same properties lost value as black neighbours moved into a majority white neighbourhood. What the study aimed to show was that black people were disproportionately affected. What they discovered was that black families were being more money savvy and buying cheaper properties and with a more family focused attitude with the only demand for housing being their descendants that created less demand. Where as white families moved to the city more often and city prices have always grown faster in price.this was in the USA . It's funny they only looked at certain areas. in the UK a similar thing was done but it was Asian communities that saw the boom in greater London

@4-Methylaminorex

2 ай бұрын

@@addicted2caffeine Correct. However ⚫ are unevolved primitives living amongst modern humans. There's simply no place for them.

@TheMelbournelad

2 ай бұрын

@@4-Methylaminorexbooom cooked blacker than your prejudice

In the 90s I worked with a man in Scotland that served on a UK experimental submarine by peroxide, he told that the scientists on board used movie cameras to record the engine performance dials as the moved all over the place and were hard to to monitor.

Because being a submariner wasn't already scary enough...They had to make it so it could randomly explode

@bannankev

2 ай бұрын

Fr😂

@dennisyoung4631

Ай бұрын

Wasn’t this like the fuel used by Russki torpedos?

@Shinzon23

Ай бұрын

@dennisyoung4631 Quite a few nations used peroxide in their torpedos.But the russians were the ones who really embraced it to a large degree. One of these cooking off in the forward torpedo compartment is what killed the kursk back in the 2000s

@dennisyoung4631

Ай бұрын

@@Shinzon23 thanks. I wasn’t entirely sure I recalled things correctly.

@spvillano

Ай бұрын

@@dennisyoung4631the British tried it first, had similar results and swiftly retired them. The Russians embraced them, in typical contrary Russian style - deny a potential major issue until a somewhat expensive vessel and crew were lost. High test peroxide, makes a great mixer for scotch - if your goal is to make it to orbit quickly... If so, mix well, pour onto brass and enjoy the light and sound show.

For the record, Peroxide Blonds were pretty explosive too.

@MR-xo1bh

25 күн бұрын

Depends on lunch

Damn. 9 years on subs myself, I have never heard of these. Wild

Ask the Russians how peroxide fueled torpedos worked out.

@dave7830

2 ай бұрын

Sorry - nobody from the Kursk is answering.

@yknott9873

2 ай бұрын

I have to blame the loss of Kursk on "Russians", not "hydrogen peroxide". Those torpedoes were very old when placed aboard the Kursk; Russian sailors were scared to death of them, with good reason, and those torpedoes had been 'retired' decades before. But Russia never throws anything away, and somebody (no doubt seeking promotion) decided to try them again, in a big naval exercise the Soviets were about to start. They were "practice torpedoes" so they didn't get any special maintenance or thorough goings-over, they just filled the peroxide tanks and put them aboard Kursk. Thus it was, there was rust inside the torpedoes that nobody thought to look for or remove - and rust is one of peroxide's catalysts. There were further really stupid mistakes made; the Wikipedia article on the loss of Kursk is an eye-opener.

@jrmckim

2 ай бұрын

Is that the Widow maker sub?

@yknott9873

2 ай бұрын

@@jrmckim No. Kursk admittedly, made many widows 😥 - but Kursk was K-141, an Oscar II class SSGN ( - "SS" = "submarine", "Guided" = it was built to shoot explosive guided missiles at ships, and "Nuclear" - ). The actual 'widowmaker', known to Russian sailors as "Hiroshima", was K-19, the first Hotel-class SSBN ( - only difference being the "B", meaning "Ballistic" = built to shoot thermonuclear ballistic missiles at enemy cities - ). K-19 had no official name BTW, as the Soviets didn't name their submarines back then, and was built a long time ago - it was commissioned in 1960, had so many problems that it wasn't used much, and was scrapped in 1991. K-141 "Kursk" was commissioned in 1994, was one of the last-built and most modern Oscar-II's, and after a horrific accident that blew off its nose and sank it, it was raised off the sea floor, towed back to Murmansk and broken up for scrap. Several Oscar-II class SSGN's are still in service with the Russian navy, but the Hotel's are all long-gone - and very, very happily, neither the Hotels nor the Oscar-II's (nor almost any other submarine in the world) ever fired a shot in anger. 😄

@krashd

2 ай бұрын

@@jrmckim No, that was K19, Russia's first nuclear sub back in the 60's, it had constant fires and radiation leaks so nobody wanted to serve on it.

Were they using a Logitech controller as well?

@Mazorzarch

2 ай бұрын

An early MadCatz prototype. At least according to several hand scrawled notes recovered from long decayed, acid eaten, journals.

@krashd

2 ай бұрын

Laughing at the Titan for using Logitech controllers when the 4.3 billion dollar Virginia-class submarines use Xbox controllers...

@Cr4z3d

Ай бұрын

@@krashdFor the Periscopes...not the maneuvering controls.

@MrJC1

Ай бұрын

​@@krashdyea.... no.

@NickyBlue99

Ай бұрын

Lmao ​@@Mazorzarch

But "HMS Exploder" is one of the most awesome vessel names, so it was all worth it.

East Germany actually once had an HTP powered car, a Turbine driven Wartburg 353. Its in a museum today, only one was ever built

@ianmangham4570

Ай бұрын

Can't find ANYTHING about it online?

The U-boat's main weakness was Doenitz's insistance of constant radio communication combined with a trust in their codes.

@urkraft3858

2 ай бұрын

Isn't that also why the Bismarck was sunk? The Royal Navy was in chase but had lost them, then Bismarck sent a lengthy radio message so the British fleet could triangulate the signal and sunk the ship.

@FinnishDragon

2 ай бұрын

@@urkraft3858 Yep. That was how the Royal Navy located the Bismarck, but that does not answer where the Bismarck was going then. IIRC, the Royal Navy originally calculated that the Bismarck was returning to Norway but they quickly realized that she was going to Brest.

@krashd

2 ай бұрын

@@FinnishDragon Brest is best.

@leechowning2712

Ай бұрын

The third weakness was that the wireless units were not yet able to be directional enough. Because of this, UK/US listening posts were able to intercept and decipher messages constantly.

@laurencek.1580

Ай бұрын

Doenitz was keen to newer technologies, but grew up in the WW1 era navy and was slow to implement changes. The type 17 took resources and time away from the type 21 or just being so late on modifying the type 9's with snorkels.

Interestingly, the Type XXI electroboat was a follow-on to the peroxide-powered Type XVII u-boat. The kriegsmarine set-out to make a full-sized ocean-going u-boat based-on the Type XVII, the Type XVIII; this boat would've been a wonder-weapon, capable of cruising at 25 kts underwater; but even with the lower half of the hull being one giant peroxide tank the Type XVIII had disappointing range; plus, the hydrogen peroxide was as you mention, hellish stuff, and so difficult to make that supplying enough of it to feed a whole class of u-boats was not realistically feasible. So the designers of the Type XVIII were moping at the bar one day, disappointed at their dream u-boat design being a non-starter, and one of them said (in German, I imagine) "Hey - I've got an idea! That big peroxide tank that takes-up the whole bottom of the Type XVIII? Why don't we fill that tank with batteries and equip the Type XVIII with diesels and big electric motors instead of Walter turbines?" Thus the Type XXI was conceived - and virtually every postwar diesel-electric submarine owes a great deal to the Type XXI. If you find yourself in Bremerhaven, I heartily recommend a visit to the Wilhelm Bauer; one of its advanced features was the fitting of small (relatively-speaking) creep motors for silent running; these motors turned the main propeller shafts slowly, via rubber v-belts; hence, they were virtually silent.

I love it when the algorithm gets it right. Of course I want to hear about exploding submarines.

Finally, for 50 years I have wondered about the details of the hydrogen peroxide submarine and why it went nowhere. Thank you Simon and the excellent team that supports you.

@tuunaes

Ай бұрын

This didn't even mention its "best" features: Peroxide molecule is quite unstable and can decompose spontaneously releasing heat, which increases chance/rate of further decomposing. So if tank can't dissipate heat forming inside it, result is thermal runaway and whole content going up in whoosh or bang with superheated steam and oxygen spread all over the place. And many things can start/catalyze that decomposing. Most transition metals and their compounds do it, lots of organic compounds (splash of peroxide on wool would turn it to flaming torch) ordinary dirt in its various compositions and universal availability. Any randomly named substance has 50-50 (or better) chance to catalyze the reaction. John D. Clarke's book Ignition! An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants has whole chapter from the joys of it. Google for book's name +pdf and you'll find it.

Well written and informative. Thanks for posting. Liked and shared.

My father was a fire control officer on a tin can in the North Atlantic. He told some wild tales of horrendous weather and, of course, U-Boats and depth charges. ASW was my warfare speciality and logged over 4000 hours in P-3s. Acoustically, a diesel sub on battery is just an acoustic hole in the water. I’d rather go against a nuc.

@johncentamore1052

2 ай бұрын

AW 1986-2012. Monitored the Kursk message traffic. Only squadron with hot contact on the Mike....the Komsomolets. Was on a cold pattern looking for him, returned from debrief, only to learn from CNN on AFRTS that he went down.

@Sacto1654

2 ай бұрын

The scary modern thing: the latest nuclear submarines are just as quiet as diesel-electric subs running on battery power. Reasons: quieter drive systems, better insulation of coolant pumps for nuclear reactors and even quieter propulsion blades, thanks to a shield around the propellers. I believe the USS _Virginia_ class subs have these features.

@jaapaap123

Ай бұрын

@@Sacto1654 They still produce a lot of heat.

@tuunaes

Ай бұрын

@@jaapaap123 Ocean is superb heatsink.

@jaapaap123

Ай бұрын

@@tuunaes yes, but it's not about practical matters, but about detection.

'boot' ? - as in shoe? I think you'll find that the German 'boot' for 'boat' is actually pronounced closer to 'boat' than the way and Englishman would pronounce 'boot' meaning a a shoe with a partial shin covering.

@4-Methylaminorex

2 ай бұрын

Wir müssen die Existenz unseres Volkes und eine Zukunft für weiße Kinder sichern

@4-Methylaminorex

2 ай бұрын

@@captainblacktooth371 Nah I just don't want a world with BP in it, everyone else is fine.

@jrmckim

2 ай бұрын

​@@4-Methylaminorex uh you mean British Petroleum? Yeah bp really did a number of the gulf of Mexico.

@jrmckim

2 ай бұрын

​@@4-Methylaminorex and yeah I know what you really meant by BP. Just thought I'd fk with you since you're too scared to use the actual words. No race is superior to another. All innocent people deserve to live.

@spigot993

2 ай бұрын

It's closer to 'bort'.

In Stephenson's Cryptonomicon they have one of these peroxide submarines.

Fun Fact: Post WW2 3 unfinished Type 21 pressure hulls were converted into beverage tanks for a german beverage company (Rossmann, Frankfurt am Main) and remain in use today.

Thank you for another awesome video 🎉

I read somewhere that some Scandinavian countries were in the 1980's experimenting with Diesel powered submarines that had a huge, super-insulated tank of liquid oxygen on board. They could run the Diesel while submerged. Not as good as quiet as a nuke boat, but still useful under some circumstances.

Peroxide is no joke. Incredibly corrosive and reactive. The crew of the Krusk found that out. RIP fellas

@tuunaes

Ай бұрын

Actually it wouldn't do instant serious damage to skin... There are far more reactive things. Like how about substance igniting already oxidized things like sand? Or really anything, including asbestos, bricks and concrete? Just read John D. Clarke's book Ignition! An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants for whole lots of fun. Google for book's name +pdf and you'll find it.

HMS Exploder (Explorer)😉

@brodriguez11000

2 ай бұрын

Blond bomb-shell takes on a different meaning.

@loribroadbent8573

2 ай бұрын

Don't forget the HMS Excaliboom.(Excalibur)

@krashd

2 ай бұрын

@@loribroadbent8573 That was HMS Excrutiator

@spvillano

Ай бұрын

Two boats that brought their own depth charges, potentially saving the enemy the trouble.

Hydrogen Peroxide was used in some early rocketry experimentation too. It didn't work out well there either.

@SomeDudeInBaltimore

2 ай бұрын

They did end up using it to power the turbopumps on the X-15.

@tuunaes

Ай бұрын

John D. Clarke's book Ignition! An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants has whole chapter from the joys of it. Google for book's name +pdf and you'll find it. In short molecule is unstable and there's exothermic self decomposing going on at some rate. And if you can't keep tank holding peroxide cool, you'll have thermal runaway and whole content going up in big whoosh or bang.

Why only fuel a tiny flying metal box with extremely corrosive liquid if you can fuel a giant diving metal box with it as well?

@ganjaman59650

2 күн бұрын

I know it was war and all but making people get into a machine like that is pretty evil, the plane i get it, it was desperate and it worked, but the submarines wtf.

A really interesting video! I had heard of Germany's "Elektroboots" but I hadn't heard of these submarines until now.

Neal Stephenson wrote of such a sub in his book Cryptonomicon. I wasn't sure if it was a fictitious invention.

Nice and informative vid!

Hint: double vowels ( aa, oo, ee) are pronounced like the name of the letter in German. So "Boot" is pronounced like "boat" not the footwear.

"Boot" in German is pronounced just like "boat", not like the shoe. 🤦‍♂️

HTP, what turned the Russian Kursk into a permanent submersible

@doctorkdsify

2 ай бұрын

Actually the Kursk was refloated & moved to a dry dock. The remains of the forward torpedo room was cut off.

Very Bizarre Submarines, Cheers from oversees the United States

@cleverusername9369

2 ай бұрын

Overseas* oversees is a very different word

@bholdr----0

2 ай бұрын

@@cleverusername9369Overseers (verb- they oversee) could also kinda apply, though, given the post war German scientists that went to the US/UK/USSR...

@jrmckim

2 ай бұрын

​​@@cleverusername9369 You know some people's phones will "autocorrect" without* people noticing. I have Grammarly on my phone and it tries to "correct" correct words. 😅 * my phone just did it here. I wrote "without" but my phone decided it should be "with" 😑

@krashd

2 ай бұрын

@@jrmckim Yeah, that's the first thing I turn off when I get a new phone.

What were the electrical stats of the drive motor & batteries? ie: volts, amps, watt-hours, etc...

VERY interesting! I wondered about the use of hydrogen peroxide for AIP purposes. Given current AIP systems, it would be interesting to know how they solved the problem. I'm sure it's too classified for casual interests.

Sometime in the mid 1950s, there was a Hydrogen Peroxide explosion in Newport, R.I. at the navy’s NUOS (Naval Underwater Ordinance Station) that killed two of my father’s coworkers who were working on a torpedo. I was around 5 to 8 years old but remember it well. The Hydrogen Peroxide powered torpedo was eventually scrapped.

14,601 tons...i don't know but i'm going to guess that means they sunk one ship?

@seanmurry6903

Ай бұрын

Maybe more like 2 or 3 small ones? They mostly sunk merchant ships as far as I know

they should have replaced the ships inner atmosphere with an inert gas and have the crew wear breathers - that would probably help make it less volatile

@EGRJ

Ай бұрын

Also, the aesthetic.

Good story. You spoke lots of words. 👍

Ah.....pre EV submarine

@stevehill4615

2 ай бұрын

Sssshhhhhh, if Elon hears we'll end up with a T-boat (Teslaboot) ---- lol

So many "electric boots" I now have Benny and the Jets from Elton John stuck in my head. Keep trying to replace it with memories of Das Boot, but no that not great song is still in my damn head

@seanmurry6903

Ай бұрын

Buh buh buh BENNEH!! BENNEH!!! BENNEH AND THE JEHHHHHHHTS!!🎶

I got a drop of 30% hydrogen peroxide on my fingernail once. I thought it was water. I didn’t think much about it. About 20 minutes later my finger hurt. My fingernail had turned white and fell off.

@MR-xo1bh

25 күн бұрын

The burning question. How do you get a droplet on you in any circumstance that you might think it was water?!?!

I find it funny that the US was like nope to dangerous not interested and Britain I think you said was very interested in it.

good content always

The torpedo that sank the Kursk was also a dummy training torpedo, it didn’t have an explosive warhead, and part of the reason why it exploded. The welds weren’t to a higher standards because it was a dummy torpedo, and the manufacturer didn’t know that peroxide was being used and just pumped out torpedoes shell housing l, so neglected the manufacturing quality standard.

Should talk about U-480. The first stealth submarine.

Free submersible cookies!

And I thought human spontaneous combustion is uncanny, I never thought there would be another in the form of submarines

Adding in the bit about the Kursk at the end was very interesting.

You my friend are amazing. I could listen to you all day.

@Lawdachris

Ай бұрын

I do, tap in to the Whistlerverse via podcasts while driving, superb

didnt know a peroxide torpedo took out the Kursk.

@paulroustan3643

Ай бұрын

The torpedo was also a dummy training torpedo, it didn’t have a explosive warhead, and part of the reason why it exploded. The welds weren’t to a higher grade because it was a dummy torpedo, and the manufacturer didn’t know the danger of peroxide, and that these torpedo needed to be made to a higher standards as a normal torpedo

Remake Silent Service Pleeeeese!

Is it just me or does Eugene B. Wilkinson look like Fred Armisen?

I love pointing out to people who are putting Hydrogen peroxide on their cuts...that it's torpedo fuel :)

Damn, that guy's forehead just keeps going up! 1:11

@seanmurry6903

Ай бұрын

Bahhaaahahahaa kinda thought it was a gag and would just keep going 😂

Note to self; 1) Never join the Navy. 2) DO NOT EVER NEVER GO INSIDE A SUBMARINE!

HEY, WHAT THE HELL, I'm eatin here!

@davidelkins3229

2 ай бұрын

Render it down!

HTP torpedoes were phased out due Kursk incident in the Russian Navy. I thought it was the last one to use those.

I was kinda thinkin of that film Fear&Loathing when he threw that orange at dr gonzo

@krashd

2 ай бұрын

"Don't stop here, this is bat country!" "I don't want to kill you, I just want to carve a little Z in your forehead!" "Look over there, two polar bears fucking!" One of the funniest and most quotable movies ever.

Wow 😮

Excellent video.

I have to wonder why Russia thought this was a good way to propel torpedoes after knowing the risks.

The schnorqul?

From the thumbnail for this video, I read "dissolving the crew alive" and I was like, nope, I'm not watching that. See you guys in the next video.

@seanmurry6903

Ай бұрын

Surprise!! It didn't actually happen, as so many people are crying about in the comments. "WHY WOULD SIMON LIE TO US?!? WHY??! 😭🥺😥" 😂😂😂 Relax my dudes it's nbd

I want to see the surviving electric u boat converted to lithium batteries and compared to the old version

Nice

The first manned spacecraft also used hydrogen peroxide to power its turbopumps.

1943: Let's make a submarine that can dissolve it's crew. 1944: Let's make a rocket plane that can dissolve it's crew. Talk about not learning.

So the thumbnail was click bait bs and no crew was dissolved. Color me shocked

@kingjellybean9795

2 ай бұрын

It doesn't say it did just says "dissolved crews" you made the implications that it happened... that's on you

@sicstar

2 ай бұрын

@@kingjellybean9795"Dissolved its crew alive" ... might implicate it did exactly that. The guy in the Me 163 also didn't get "dissolved" btw...

@finlay9616

2 ай бұрын

Welcome to modern KZread and media bro. It worked too. Hate the game not the players in it. Capitalism is the reason for this, not Simon. But keep crying and filling your adult diapers. I'm sure someone will eventually give a fvck 😂🤣

@CyberData4

2 ай бұрын

“Thanks for watching!” - Factboy, allegedly.

@ferretyluv

2 ай бұрын

Really? Thumbs down, then.

Is that Herbert Lom with the binoculars at 9:30?

Someone should find out how to pronounce the German "boot" or translate it as "boat" - seeing it has nothing to do with foortwear..

@craigdunbar2972

Ай бұрын

How do you translate foortwear 😂

A history of submarines would have been a more appropriate title for this video.

Yeah…the famous admiral Dónitz….and his shhnorkel…😂 All the best to everyone

@yknott9873

2 ай бұрын

BTW the "schnorkel" was an old idea by then - the Germans stole it from the Dutch.

1/137

Admiral Doe-nitz, not Donitz!

Wow your speech speed was fast.

There was no "Allied navy", only the navies of the various allies.

How did it affect the wales?

Strange to pronounce the word "boat" as in German, but nothing else - e.g. Doenitz 😉

@spigot993

Ай бұрын

Germans don't even pronounce it like that, it's more like 'bort', definitely not like the footwear 'boot'.

Admiral 'Durr-Nits'........Not 'Donn-itzz'..😉😂 Great video as always though!

"The Sschnokell" 😊 My girlfriend can't understand Simon. 😅 Meanwhile I love the accent dude. ❤

I was going to rewatch the Kursk ITS video after this, but I find it's disappeared from KZread? There are like half a dozen into the shadows videos that just don't exist anymore, the betel nut video, chernobyl liquidators, kursk. WTF? Any explanation from the channel would be nice...

Four person crew, blonde and tear shaped. It's the Beatles yellow submarine

The flickering effect you put in the videos is making me nauseous and giving me headaches

Wow, I'll think about this technology next time I'm bleaching my hair (not with HTP).

So glad they found a safer alternative. Just wish Russia would have paid closer attention to the missiles before the K

How about a fuel cell boat? remove the engines, replace them & the batteries with fuel cells. replace the fuel with cryo tanks for LOX & Liquid hydrogen. reduce the crew - no more need for engine mechanics. should be super quiet. not really sure about the range, though.

Now we have a flirtation with the volatile power of lithium batteries!

Germans know how to build good boats .

@todayifoundout do the origin of the phrase "blood is thicker than water"

On the plus side, the peroxide subs were bacteria and virus free.

Torpedoes were developed pre WW1, not WW2 as stated here (timestamp 11:34 )

I love your channel but the music in the background of your dialog is very distracting

Thumbnail is misleading

Hydrogen buildup from water in the batteries (electrolysis?) + an oxygen rich environment = BOOM! (My guess before watching the vid, anyway.) (Edit- Nope, i lose: I forgot about H2O2. Yikes.)

Peroxide was also the culprit of something like Kirsk.

@paulroustan3643

Ай бұрын

It’s Kursk, not Kirks

and secondary to the script's intent was the blithely entertaining simon abjectly butchering the german language. good vid, tho!

4:23

Does simon own this channel? Or still under contract

Exploding... or imploding?

@heikoscheuermann

2 ай бұрын

​@@tahwseodtiyes, one could say they exist. You just need to force it towards the inside with a strong enough casing and then they call it implosion device. Think about the first atomic bomb, it was 'triggered' with that kind of implosion. And a thermobaric bomb? It does explode and then instantly pulls enough vacuum to destroy your lungs. Is the destruction of your lungs enough to call it an implosion? (i'm really asking what you think because i have no clue if that is enough).

@KeithHearnPlus

2 ай бұрын

First one, then the other.

I would have called one HMS Oxygenthief