Are you on the Canon R system? Are you looking at the R system? Have you left the R system? Tell me about it below!

@CryptoJones

Ай бұрын

I am a Canon R shooter for professional work but I use Fujifilm cameras for my personal stills work.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

@@CryptoJones me too! I just released this same video yesterday for the Fuji mount! kzread.info/dash/bejne/mmSmu9B_gsjNo6w.html

@selkiemaine

Ай бұрын

I bought the R when it first came out - I'm a retired (mostly product and marine) photographer who had to quit for years due to cataracts and follow-up surgeries. The EOS-R was a present to myself when I got my vision back. I've had that camera going on 6 years now and while it's far from perfect, I still love it. Just last month, I added an R7 - what a beast for the money! Again, imperfect, but what's perfect - it's still WAY better. And I find the capabilities mind blowing. To be honest, my old pro gear was all Canon EF (and I went with EF because of my good experience shooting FD ...), so it was natural to save money on lenses and just stick with Canon. I've added a bunch of the less expensive new RF lenses (mostly great, couple of blah), and a metric ton of vintage glass just for the fun of it. There's nothing like spending like 80 bucks on a lens and getting a unique look that is hard to get otherwise. What would I like? RF lenses with EF ergonomics - those slick-sided lenses just make me look to find the rings, which are often hard to see. They're almost disguised a lot of the time. I'd like focus ranges on the lens body. I'd like Zebras in live view. I'd like quick firing flash (like the Olympus OM system) so I can do flash-enhanced focus bracketing in camera (I guess the R3 can do that - but it's lousy for everything else I do). I want 3rd party lenses on the full frame cameras. I want 30fps with no wobble or distortion. What do I like - I can't judge against other systems, as I haven't used them. But, colors are wonderful, and I am able to make the camera do things I could NEVER make a DSLR do. And, now the R7 is even better. The autofocus makes my head spin, it's so good. Focus bracketing is more fun than a photographer should be allowed to have. Frame rate opens so many doors for me, and 32mp in a crop sensor is just fantastic (though I should note that you have to REALLY pick your lenses and settings carefully, it's hell on lenses that don't resolve or have purple fringing etc).

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

@@selkiemaine thanks for sharing your experiences. The R7 is an often overlooked camera. I did a three part review of it when it came out and I gotta say, it impressed the heck out of me. Thanks for watching!

@kenschwarz8057

Ай бұрын

Great, practical review. I think you hit the main points. The lenses and overall reliability have been just great. My main usability gripe are the arbitrary restrictions on button customization (some buttons can be adapted to certain controls, some cannot-why not let any do anything??) and no labeling of custom modes (I can’t remember what c1, c2, and c3 are, especially now that you can save entire configurations to the card…and if I could label them with a word, life would be better. There are many nooks and crannies to the settings which feel like legacy hacks more than a clean design but I understand that Canon has to be pragmatic to fit with existing user expectations and cautious not to make things too complicated, and they’ve done well with a system that has evolved 30+ years.

Canon cameras never fail to impress with their exceptional image quality and reliability

@KevinDeal

27 күн бұрын

They are fine cameras

I'm also a longtime Canon user. I love their ergonomics and their menu system. That said, the menus have some odd English-language quirks that could be addressed by firmware. For instance, "enable" and "disenable" instead of the much simpler "on" and "off'. C'mon, Canon.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

On and Off certainly are more to the point.

Changed to R7 a year ago coming from 1D3 and 7D. Sold all my Sigma EF lenses and most Canon EF. Just kept EF-S 10-22, EF 28-135 is and EF 100-400 L 5.6 is ii. Bought a TTArtisan 35mm F0.95. Very happy. I live in the sticks to shoot birds etc almost daily. Very satisfied. To me, it appears there is a huge amount of snobbery when it comes to lenses and cameras. If it is a Leica it has to be fantastic. If it is an RF it costs too much. From what I can see, these RF lenses outperform anything on their price level. That won’t stop me from wanting to pay less though. Preferably nothing… Oh well.. I am working towards a RF 100-300 with TC’s…

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

The R7 is a fine camera and you probably get amazing results with those lenses. You have an awesome bird set up.

Yes, I am even a little more confused, but you answered and confirmed some of my other question. So, thanks!

@KevinDeal

26 күн бұрын

Happy to help and confuse. Lol.

I've been a Canon shooter since 2009. It wasn't even my first choice, I only went with Canon because chosen Olympus was out of stock at the time. But I've never had any problems with Canon cameras, so I've never actually needed repairs on the camera body. However, I do have some criticisms about the R system. My main complaint is the inconsistency in button layout. The original EOS R seemed like a big departure from Canon's usual ergonomic design, and newer cameras like the R8 and R10 are different from each other as well. This inconsistency is frustrating because it messes with muscle memory. Another ergonomic issue is Canon's obsession with the "LOCK" function. It's been the most annoying feature on their cameras since the DSLR era, and even if you disable it, you can't assign that button to something else.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

That's a great point. I own the R6, R7, R8 and R50 and I have to reprogram my brain every time because the button layouts are different!

Weight / Size and Cost reasons I didn’t move. I had a bad experience with their printers, so I stayed away from cameras. Thank God HP doesn’t make. Camera, it would never see the light with me. I’ve done Lumix, Pentax, Olympus, SONY and now Fuji. I’ve always been interested in Nikon. As a kid, I always noticed National Geographic photographers used and I always thought those guys were the greatest photographers. What’s the saying?…. When you’re on the top… there’s only one way to go. I think many have thought Nikon’s days were numbered? From what I read and hear, they may be turning the tide. Z8 has my interest at the moment. Still enjoying Fuji and am optimistic they’ll get their focus issues fixed (eventually). Question will be … how long to wait? Very balanced review! Kudos!

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

Nikon has hit some speed bumps in recent years, but some of their newer cameras are promising. I want all the companies to do well. Competition is a good thing.

Good video, thank you! A small correction: Canon didn’t put a control ring on their most expensive lenses - the big white telephoto lenses all the way up to the 1200mm f/8 which sells for $20,000.

@KevinDeal

19 күн бұрын

Good catch. I guess you’d need pretty long arms to access it on those lenses. lol.

I use Canon cameras/lenses for the last 40 years and I can subscribe to everything you have said. 👍 I also use the Leica system, so I am not a fanboy of any brand but I appreciate quality, both related to hardware and image quality.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

One of these days I am going to get a Leica. Fine cameras.

I left the Canon R system for Fuji about a year ago. Canon is a great camera system however I left due to the shear weight and cost to add L glass to my kit. I started out with an EF 24-105 mm L lens and another sigma mid range Art lens and both performed well with the adapter however after several mountain hikes with this beast, I had to downsize my kit. You are correct, Canon has the best in camera menus and is easier to set up than Fuji. Guess I like the idea of working to get a great shot in full manual with the Fuji. Canon makes it very easy. If I were shooting fast action all the time, no doubt I would be on the Canon R system.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

I shoot on both systems and they each have their advantages. Can't fault anyone for shooting on either. Both have good reasons. I am shooting more of my personal work on Fuji these days for the size and weight. Professional work, I'm still on Canon. Thanks for watching!

Hi Kevin. I've been shooting on the R7 for over a year now. Doing city and landscape I'm pleased that Sigma is coming with a 10-18mm for the R system. For me trying to build a business selling big print's, cheaper lenses will be one of the reason's I'll stay with Canon for now. I did seriously think about changing brand.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

The R7 is such a good camera. I have one and I love it! I reviewed some of those Sigma lenses they are making for Canon on this channel for the Fuji system. They are amazing lenses. There's no doubt in my mind you will be able to get some amazing city and landscape shots with that 10-18. Canon APSC owners definitely got some great news last week with that third party announcement. Thanks for stopping by!

Really helpful. Well done! Watched both your Canon and Fuji overviews. Considering ‘buying into’ my first autofocus system. While quite different in many ways, looking at both Fuji XH2 and Canon R6ii. So these are helpful overviews to better understand the wider systems.

@KevinDeal

24 күн бұрын

R6MKII much better with AF. Prefer the XH2 for colors. Thanks for watching!

@oliverkoch2129

24 күн бұрын

@@KevinDeal Yes, love what I have seen of the Fuji colours. Plus the affordability of the lenses. Not really interested in video. Photography only. Documentary, travel, family. Hate complicated menus. I’m coming from the simplicity of the Leica M240 system. But ageing eyes could increasingly do with an autofocus for faster moving subject, such as children/family. And certainly don’t have funds to deeper invest into Leica system (ie SL3). Canon seems to be better at low light (don’t like using flash).

My first mirrorless was the M6 M2. My second body was. 90D. I took every opportunity to shoot anything that moved. I abused that gear. I later got the original R shoot weddings and events some journal shots with the non L 85mm and 50mm. That’s all I could afford. That R was dropped down a flight of concrete steps, caught in a tropical down pour and dropped kick at a wedding. It never stopped working . I now shot with a R6M2 and 2 R8’s . I shoot professionally with the 28-70 F2 and the cheap 35mm 1.8. I have earned 10x my investment. The gear is expensive $$&. However I never expected to begin with a R5 and L Glass. Have plan it took 5 years for me. I gripe with Canon is the constraints on the R mount also limit access to glass I need for my work…. A faster 35, a lighter mid range telephoto. Sony , Nikon and Fuji have better glass variety. Sharp is good. I can work for sharpness. I look for focal range options and A FULL size video jack. 😡great post KD!

@KevinDeal

25 күн бұрын

Thanks. My experiences have been similar to yours. Rock solid tanks.

To be honest, size and price definitely matters even for professionals. Now that most brands have equally if not more impressive choice of glass than canon, it all boils to who has a more versatile system.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

Sony and Nikon have definitely been stepping up their game, and I love it. Competition is a good thing.

My experience, good and bad, is consistent with yours. I like that you give the non-L glass some love, too. I often see comments like, “L glass is too big, too expensive, and all the non-L glass just sucks.” I have plenty of expensive glass, but I also have the 16, 35, and 85 sucky lenses. In practical use they are pretty dang awesome-way better than any other low cost lenses I’ve tried over the years. Only complaint? The lens hoods are a ridiculously overpriced option. Thankfully Amazon sells the cheap JJC ones that work just fine.

@KevinDeal

27 күн бұрын

Non-L glass deserves love. Great lenses. And yes, I got the JJC for both the 35 and 16. Excellent hoods. Canon hoods are massively overpriced. Thanks for watching!

Excellent video 👍👌📸 I’m thinking of buying a canon r6 ii

@KevinDeal

29 күн бұрын

Good choice! They're like $500 off at the moment, so it's a good time to buy.

I'm on Canon w/ an R5, 100-500, 24-105 and 200-400 F4 TC. Great system. However opening up third party lenses would be nice. As for reliability you are spot on. Thanks

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

Great points! Thanks for watching!

Currently a Sony shooter but right now jumping ship to Canon. Was shooting the Sony A7R5 but this camera is to slow for me. (Only 10FPS max) and would like more FPS. I had a lot of missed focused pictures and finding myself to struggle a lot with the auto focus system. So i borrowed a Canon R5 and this made me feel like cheating, it felt easer to use and had way more pictures in focus. The nail in the coffin is the FPS count when using a 3th party lens. If i bought a a9iii but use a sigma lens it would max out at 15FPS. This cap is pure to make you buy sony lenses. Feels like tou are beeing messed with.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

R5 AF is definitely a cheat code. R3 is even more so.

You’re a great communicator and seem to do a very good assessment of gear stuff - and so I have a request for you: I recently bought the canon R100 $300 and I love the fact that it has the red beam/focus assist feature. am I correct that this is missing from a lot of modern cameras and why is that - what’s going on there? my Event photographer pals are finding the mirrorless cameras a little iffy in extreme low light

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

Most cameras do have it, but the feature is turned off by default. The R100, while a powerful camera, is considered an entry-level camera and that beam assist is super useful to a beginner, so Canon probably by default has it turned on with the R100. If I remember correctly, my R50 had it on by default and I turned it off. I personally don't use beam assist, but it's good to know it's there if I need it. Thank you for the kind words. I try my best to be a good communicator.

@tomtracy5396

Ай бұрын

@@KevinDeal you know I’m not so sure - my trustee Canon 6d doesn’t have the dedicated red beam built into the body

Have the ef135 with adapter is amazing how sharp it is

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

It is a fine lens.

One thing I think you missed that is actually of importance to studio product photographers is that only the r3 has support for focus stacking with flash. Then there’s people on the Canon forums suggesting I use Led lighting. That is not a viable option for many. Hopefully the new r5 mark ii that should be announced this month will have that feature. That’s one of the things that has stopped me from switching over. The other thing is lack of mid range priced telephoto lenses. Would really love to see a 180-600mm, and a 400mm f/4.5 like Nikon have and I’m not a fan of that RF 100-500 4.5/7.1. Would have preferred a 100-400 4.5/5.6 like Nikon and Sony have. Sure that extra 100 mm can be of use to wildlife photographers but 500mm at f/7.1 just doesn’t create enough separation from the background when I shoot outdoor sports and is not great in low light. Of course I could limit the max zoom to around 360mm and still get f/5.6 but still I’d prefer an RF 100-400.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

Yes, I try to keep my pros in cons pretty general about the system and not so specific to one model of camera with one specific feature. However, from your standpoint, I can see how import that feature would be to you. I shoot often in the studio but never have the need to focus stack with flash. Out of curiosity, which other camera models out there have that feature besides the R3? In regards to you comment about lenses, now that Canon has opened up their APSC to third party companies, I hope that means their optics division is focused (no pun intended) on rolling out more lenses soon. On the opposite side of the spectrum, the RF mount turns six years old in 2024 and we still don't have an L prime wider than 50mm. That's insane.

@fotofx9589

Ай бұрын

@@KevinDeal Great to see a reply Kevin. Much appreciated. Quite a few systems have it. Most of the Nikon Z’s, OM systems, Fuji, Sony (A7r5) and I believe even Panasonic have it. I shoot mainly fitness products so I typically do focus stacking manually but to have that feature be automatic is so much more convenient. Honestly really love how far Canon have come the past few years. I prefer them over Nikon and Sony but I’ve held off because I really need that feature in a high megapixel body. The telephoto I can live with since I shoot sports as a hobby. At least for now.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

@@fotofx9589 today I learned my Fuji has focus stacking with flash. lol. Clearly I never use that feature. Focus stacking in general is becoming more popular, so I think we may very well see the ability to stack with flash in the R5 MKII. I am excited for the rumored announcement and already have money put aside for it.

@fotofx9589

Ай бұрын

@@KevinDeal lol. I bet many don’t. I am too. I’m hearing they may announce it as early as this week. Have a great one.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

@@fotofx9589 likewise! Thanks for stopping by!

I wish they had over and under exposure warnings like Olympus. It's soooooo easy! I also love the Canon USA refurbished store.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

I would love those warnings pre-exposure. The refurbished store got me an R8 for $999 and a 50mm 1.8 for $99. It’s my go to.

I have had issues with my RP freezing/glitching, maybe 2-3 times over 1.5 years. Usually this occurs after a day with intense use. I don't know if it is overheating or what. Reinserting the battery fixes the glitch tho.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

Interesting. Sorry to hear that. Have you tried different cards? Maybe that is an issue. Or a firmware update?

@Salaaran

Ай бұрын

@@KevinDeal I have tried with different sandisk cards, but again it's been few and far between. The firmware is current.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

@@Salaaran Sounds like you've done everything right.

@Salaaran

Ай бұрын

@@KevinDeal I would imagine it's just a combination of it being hot, having a filled buffer, and then just having a perfect storm of less than ideal conditions. But for an entry model like the RP, I don't fault the system too much. It's still working well for me and would for sure recommend it as a beginner camera for people who don't want to start with DSLR

Is that an Austin FC shirt? Nice!

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

Affirmative. Dale Dale Dale ATX!

The 85 1.2 is the stuff that dreams are made of. Getting my hands on that would be the pinnacle of my shooting experience. Nikon's 85 is very good. There is a small handful of photographers that I look at when I'm shopping for lenses. You shooting Gabby with the nifty fifty almost made me pull the trigger on an R50. Good glass makes amateurs like me look like Pro's. Canon has got it covered in spades. The question is, do I drop 3k on a lens to becomes a better photographer or am I just appeasing my ego. If I spent more time understanding lighting and shooting cheap lenses, I would probably improve my abilities. Then you throw Sigma and Tamaron into the mix and open up the rabbit hole. Canon's move to allow after market lenses in full frame is inevitable if that want to hang with the others.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

85 1.2 is amazing. It's not going to help you become a better photographer though. I feel like we buy gear for ourselves, so it may still make you happier.

i started in my photography journey in the late 90s with a Canon EOS, moving to DSLRs from 35mm in 2004, then to mirrorless in 2023. The biggest weakness so far is the guy behind the lens :-) If theres an issue, 99% of the time its my own fault. I agree about reliability and lens costs, i have never had a Canon camera fail me in the field, and would love lenes like the 100-500mm L lens, yet the cost is too much for an amature photographer to buy into pro-lenses.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

I agree that 99% of the time it's the person behind the lens. Thanks for tuning in!

I hate control ring because it does not have the aperture markings..

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

It’s in two places. Both of your screens. I'm assuming you use your two screens to look at other settings, right? Why wouldn't you just look at your aperture there? You don't even have to take your eyes off the screen. It takes more effort to move your face over your camera and then look down at aperture markings on a lens than it does to just key your eye in the viewfinder or your face behind the larger screen, right?

Idk but if the RFS lenses are good enough i don't see why people can't go pro with Canon Apsc gear.

@KevinDeal

28 күн бұрын

With the recent announcement of Sigma and Tamron being allowed to make f1.4 lenses for APSC, you definitely have a good argument there. Before that, Canon's APS-C lens offerings (RFS) were ok, but nothing special. With Sigma and Tamron being able to introduce lenses that are several stops brighter, this makes getting an R10, R100, R50. R7 much more appealing, which is a win for hobbyists.

hi Kevin i would buy any cool camera max i want to spend 2500eur and Please can u recomment to me be use for travel recording my kids Ibis have to be there very sharpnes lens as well and dont so heavy thanks for u answer Regards Sofia

@KevinDeal

27 күн бұрын

If you get a camera with a lens that has IS, you may not need IBIS, depending on how you shoot. You could get a Canon R8, and an image stabilized lens like the 24-105 f4 IS. For travel and kids, I'd be perfectly happy with the combination of the RF24-105 f4 IS and the RF35mm f1.8 IS. I went to Italy with my family and those were the only two lenses I used. I made a video review of each lens, if you want to check that out. If you have to have IBIS, your choices are the R7 and the R6MK II. All other cameras with IBIS will be beyond your budget.

I love Canon system with RF Canon lenses, they are awesome, no need for any third party lens. It is expensive yes, but it pays off if you do professional work. RF lenses are just awesome and are top of the line investment for pro photographers. When I was starting 15 years ago, yes I had been using many third party lenses cause they were cheaper, but never better. It took 10 years to make a great collection of Canon lenses in my bag but now I have all that I need. They make me happy.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

My argument for third party lenses is the slow pace in which Canon is rolling out native lenses. The RF mount turns 6 years old in 2024 and the widest prime L lens they have is the 50mm rf/1.2, which is ironically the very first L prime lens they made. That is insane. No 35? 28? 24? 14?

3rd party FF lenses. They're just driving ppl away. Seriously I can spend 2k on a lens or 600$ for 3rd party that is 90% as good. Love canon but......yeah. Also the ergonomics are GREAT for work. But....not fun. It's like a minivan. Not stylish or cool but gets the job done. I literally got a Nikon Zfc for my fun camera lol. Thinking of getting a used Fuji too. (Woman with tiny tiny hands and T. rex arms)

@KevinDeal

27 күн бұрын

Nikon Zf looks like a fantastic camera. Saw them at the WPPI Show. Slick looking.

@ladyethyme

27 күн бұрын

@@KevinDealyeah, BUT- there's no chrome/black option, and I think the colours are just stupid looking. (And it's heeeeeavy for my tiny woman t rex arms) I'm shallow with the looks of my fun camera what can I say lol.😂

@KevinDeal

27 күн бұрын

@@ladyethyme nothing wrong with having an aesthetic preference. I like my cameras looking boring and black because my wife can't tell them apart when I buy a new one. lol

There is one reason I will not buy a Canon RF camera (after using Canon professionally since 2004). The damn side hinged rear screen. Every one of their cameras has this awful screen, they can’t even be bothered to give us a choice, it’s their way or nothing. It’s too slow, conspicuous and obtrusive and only pacifies the vloggers. Sick of it, sort your sh*t out Canon.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

I have both types of screens (my other system is Fuji). I prefer the flip screen that Canon has. So it's not one size fits all. There are some shots I do low to the ground vertically during my portrait sessions that only a flip screen can achieve. Clearly it's a dealbreaker for you and you gotta do what you gotta do. Thanks for watching!

@JeffreyHauser

Ай бұрын

Hi Kevin, I appreciate your channel very much & agree with your recent overview on Canon & Fuji systems. I shot Canon for nearly 40 years but switched to Fuji several years ago. The cost of the new RF lenses became cost prohibitive for me, although their “L” lenses are some of the best in the industry. I am a “ retired” photographer so I mostly photograph what interests me as opposed to shooting for clients. Canon served me well for many years but I am now heavily invested in Fuji glass, & I have not been disappointed. Now if Fuji can get their autofocus on par with the other major camera manufactures, I would be very satisfied.Best wishes for your channel & photo/ video endeavours.

@disco4178

Ай бұрын

I wish Canon had over and inner exposure warnings like Olympus. It's sooooooooo easy!

@Mariner1460

27 күн бұрын

Breathe, dude, breathe. I’m with you-much prefer the tilt screen on the old M5 to these flippy things on the R bodies, but that’s not enough to stop me from loving all the awesomeness that is the R system.

Canon want to keep monopoly without lens. Customers to suffer.

@KevinDeal

Ай бұрын

That has definitely become a topic of discussion.