Excellent explanation, makes me want to continue in Being and Time

This was so helpful!! I'm taking a class on puzzles and paradoxes and this is helping me understand antinomies so much better!!! Your ability to explain it was extremely helpful

Bro, I'm currently reading the first critics and it's very taugh, I hope you'll keep uploading such short videos on Kant, it really helps.

@prerna22munshi

2 жыл бұрын

He has also done longer videos on the first critique which he is not quite satisfied with himself...but you could check the playlist out

Really good, clear and well presented. I’m in.

Thanks for your videos!

legend dude, keep doing your stuff

Great explanation. Thank you.

Thank you this is great!

Very good video!

Thanks for this

Thanks brother!

Awesome bro

I somehow understand this but the implications throws my entire explanation for our world into question lol

By focusing on the actual document and not the concept in its entirety, I'm left wanting a broader analysis. What was this document in relationship to Kant's other critiques for example? What was the philosophical impact of this document on later thinkers? I'd like broader context, and perhaps less detail of the specific document. Kant set the trajectory of Western philosophy towards Idealism, and it is important to understand why.

@IndustrialMilitia

2 жыл бұрын

The Transcendental Dialectic, specifically Kant's Antinomies, is the starting point for Hegel's Dialectical Idealism. Hegel talks about this in the Lesser Logic.

@trumpsupporter1016

Жыл бұрын

Kant's version of idealism is really a bit on the dualist society, onely the dualism is between phenomena and noumena

5:26 bookmark

6:01 bookmark

Hi sir. Coukd you upload a video about tge ninth chapter on the Location of Culture The Postcolonial and Postmodern: Tge Question of Agency

@TheoryPhilosophy

2 жыл бұрын

Hi I've covered the entire book :)

@abdolh2664

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheoryPhilosophy alright I will watch it. Thank you so much

Really good over all, but since you are writing on Critical Philosophy, I will be a bit critical. I think a bit ot the language could be refined, for instance saying 'sensible world' instead of 'matter'. No, you can't say the world is the 'existeence of matter' - at best you can say the world is what appears to us as matter, energy and animated/conscious beings. This may seem trivial, but it isn't, because when most people hear 'matter' they think they know what you're talking about - 'yeah, matter are things made of atoms and have mass' but that creates two problems, one is for Kant - it seems to takee a postion that we should come down on the side of the 2nd antinomy that there are indivisible parts. The other is for our understanding of Physic, because, ofc, not only are atoms divisible into electrons, neutrons and protons, but the neutrons and protons can be broken down into about 3 quarks each, but also, the vsst majority of mass does not come from the quarks -they have some mass, but quite little, but rather from the strong nuclear force which binds everything together. Incidentally, Physics provides a working example of the 2nd antinomy in action. One set of scientists are supporters of one side, annother set supporters of the other. There are supporters of the standard model who believe that the two dozen or so elementatry cannot be further subdivided. On the other hand, string theorists and m-theory supporters say that strings or branes are more fundamental than quarks and the other elementary particlss.

David is cute in this one

The second antimony sounds much more like a problem for physicists than for philosophers.

@groghaus1549

2 жыл бұрын

Physics lends it's history to philosophy, Leibniz had a theory of composition: the monads. He also had a hand in the creation of calculus. So too has Aristotle dealt with problems we'd now ascribe to the field of physics. Imo that division between science and philosophy is very recent.

@4:55 it doesnt make sense, ..i think you mis paraphrased

What a load of horseshit.

you should go to jail.

@thespicyonion3362

2 жыл бұрын

no u

@threeblindchickens

Жыл бұрын

why