Sabine used quantum mechanics a year ago to predict this week's Nobel Prize winners! Congrats!

@davidtuer5825

Жыл бұрын

No, she thought she had the answer but she was entangled with the newfangled ideas.

@ChurchOfThought

Жыл бұрын

yeet

@barnsisback8524

Жыл бұрын

Nope, this is called superdeterminism ! It’s a prediction !

@It__From__Bit

Жыл бұрын

I'm waiting for her head to start spinning around like Linda Blair in the exorcist.

@exoplanet11

Жыл бұрын

This video proves Einstein (that guy) was wrong: Sabine sent a message back in time this year, when she learned the Nobel Prize winners, and told herself to make this video!

Whoever disproves Bell will get the No-Bell prize. Seems fair enough.

@andregustavo2086

2 жыл бұрын

Seems FAR enough 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@vicca4671

2 жыл бұрын

Here, take my angry like, I loved it and it's awful

@feynstein1004

2 жыл бұрын

@@vicca4671 Lol thanks

@quixodian

2 жыл бұрын

Hopefully will receive the award in absentia.

@markoshivapavlovic4976

2 жыл бұрын

Yeap

How spooky that she predicted all three names correctly! I have actually won a bet with one of my friends today regarding the winners of 2022 Nobel in Physics due to this video. 😍

@starguy2718

Жыл бұрын

I read a book, "Entanglement", by Amir Aczel; the book went into detail about Aspect, Clauser, and Zeilinger, and their experiments. It wasn't that big of a stretch, to figure they would win the Nobel Physics prize.

@aarondavis8943

Жыл бұрын

Spooky at any distance!

@WayneLynch69

Жыл бұрын

@@starguy2718 Aczel is deserving of great respect. Much more so than poseur/ass Brian Greene

@JinKee

Жыл бұрын

​@@starguy2718 like picking a trifecta in a three horse race (you still have 5 ways to get it wrong)

Sabine, I won't pretend to understand the matter you've explained in such detail. But I do find it all terribly interesting! Thanks for your fabulous presentations.

@dand8530

2 жыл бұрын

I feel the same way, most of the time I understand about 5% of what she’s talking about but I can’t stop watching.

@clovislyme6195

2 жыл бұрын

Those of us (well, me at least), who are interested non-specialists in this sea of complexity, speculation and inconsistent expert opinion, need to find a few people in the field whom we decide to trust, who don't talk down to us, but neither do they oversimplify. Sabine is, obviously, someone I view in that light.

@vasile.effect

2 жыл бұрын

Theres nothing to understand. Anything which beggins with "quantum" is bs. Quantum theory- its bs. Quantum computing- bs. Quantum teleportation - hmm let me think...more bs ?

@nairsheasterling9457

2 жыл бұрын

@@vasile.effect Then prove it bs and pick up your Nobel Prize. Oh wait, you're just talking out your ass. Stfu.

@sunnyjim1355

2 жыл бұрын

Probably the best deep science channel on YT, although PBS Space Time is excellent too.

I want a T-shirt with "that's what we'll talk about tuday" and another with Einstein's face "yes, this guy again"

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

I want an entire range of T-shirts based on this channel.

@WhoTheLoL

2 жыл бұрын

Yes yes yes!

@SabineHossenfelder

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the suggestion, I'll look into this :)

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder I will throw more money at this channel for t-shirts!

@robfilmer

2 жыл бұрын

I’ll buy that Einstein t-shirt!

Today Zeilinger, Aspect & Clauser were awarded the Nobel prize for this work. This video could not have been more timely!

@robertbutsch1802

Жыл бұрын

This video is not “timely” because it was put up by Sabine more than a year ago. So it is actually spooky action at a distance (in time).

@netrunningnow

Жыл бұрын

@@robertbutsch1802 Well it could be timely if it violates causality in that the Nobel prize this year sparked the making of the video.

@-_Nuke_-

Жыл бұрын

@@robertbutsch1802 In time and in place because that video was made in some place in space where the Earth (and the entire solar system with the Earth) will NEVER come back to! Even if the solar system does a full circle around the galaxy, the galaxy itself would have moved entirely from that spot! A KZreadr named Dialect has a video about this very topic! Called "Why you can't travel backwards in space" and I'm inspired from there!

@leojames7331

Жыл бұрын

Seems odd to me that Sabine hasn't made a video directly addressing the fact that local realism has been demonstrated to be false.

I am sure the Nobel Committee had this video in the back of their mind for today's Nobel Prize in Physics!

@zyzhang1130

Жыл бұрын

I’m so confused right now… the title says Nobel prize 2022 but the video was published one year ago 😵😵

@stefanbalauca7481

Жыл бұрын

@@zyzhang1130 I think she just changed the title now, and the yt algorithm likes it better this way :)))

@zyzhang1130

Жыл бұрын

@@stefanbalauca7481 ohh didn’t know u can do that (even for thumbnail) after the video was posted 😯😯thanks for the info！

@robertovoce5545

Жыл бұрын

Nevertheless good prediction! Maybe the Sabine in the past is quantum entangled with the Sabine in the future? 🤣

Friends and Family Teleportation Plan: "I'm sorry Dave. My teleporter is stuck in an infinite Verizon Mobius loop, and exceeded my data limit. Some of your body parts are still in the cloud. Please hold while I contact Alice and Bob at tech support."

"Do you guys just put quantum in front of everything?" I think that was an Antman 2 quote.

@Ghryst

2 жыл бұрын

i wanna discover a new species of animal, so i can name its feces, "quantum hyperspace warp drive teleporter"

I adore this. I love how QM has this loophole that allows something to travel instantaneously from Alice to Bob but you can't tell what's traveled unless you send something else that's limited by the speed of light. The universe is like a cheap lawyer squinting at its own fine print. :-)

@david203

2 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, this understanding is incorrect. In entanglement there is no communication of information, instantaneous or not.

@jcortese3300

2 жыл бұрын

@@david203 Unfortunately, it's not. Watch the video again. "Your Honor, my client has not technically violated causality."

@georgelionon9050

2 жыл бұрын

@@david203 Actually there is. But you cannot make use of it to send information you want. The particle decides on the information it wants and then sends it faster-than-light to it's partner. That's what the bell experiment suggests.

@david203

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgelionon9050 No, the Bell experiments do not suggest that. Give me a reliable reference.

@LcdDrmr

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgelionon9050 Unfortunately, she didn't explain how the information is "mixed" with the entangled particle. But in any case, her measurement of it after that creates a "hash" of what the information is. That's why she has to send how she measured it to the other end. When that same measurement is used, the "hash" reveals the information she mixed in the first particle. To understand how that works is not really what she explained, just that it can work. It's still very confusing, but the principle is that the information itself is never sent, so it can't be intercepted in any way. The information about her measurement could be, but it's no help to the interceptor because they have no access to the second particle. In this sense, it's a foolproof encryption. There is no communication between the particles.

maybe it should be named as ''remote cloning'' instead of teleportation

@SabineHossenfelder

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed, I like that suggestion.

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder No no no, REMOTE *QUANTUM* CLONING!

@brothermine2292

2 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder : The name "remote cloning" would fail to draw attention to the destruction of the original.

@epajarjestys9981

2 жыл бұрын

@@brothermine2292 Good point. "Teleportation" seems to make more sense.

@epajarjestys9981

2 жыл бұрын

@@loweel2897 Who are you even talking to?

1:03 It is always pleasant to hear Einstein's name pronounced correctly.

The three potential Nobel's you cited could be summarised in a Nobel for John Bell, who unfortunately passed away too early.

@SabineHossenfelder

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed :/

Can't wait to hear more on your progress on superdeterminism. Keep us updated!

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

Ditto!

@georgelionon9050

2 жыл бұрын

Can Superdeterminism be summarized in every point of the universe already knows of every other point in the universe (because of common big bang history) and in effect be "holographic" in the original sense, as that from any slice contains (theoretical) the information of the whole? If that's case, I must say, it's a sorrow attempt to save locality.

@eljcd

2 жыл бұрын

Sabine post her papers in the arxiv, and coments them in her blog, backreaction, if you are interested.

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

@@eljcd I've also had discussions about it with Sabine and other commenters on Backreaction. It was a fair bit to get my head around when I started digging in more.

The metaphor I like to use is a pair of magic treasure chests: Putting an object in one chest and closing the lid teleports it into the other, regardless of how far apart they are. However, upon closing the lid, this generates a magic key that must be used to open the other chest. The key must be transported classically, below the speed of light. You can try to force open the 'receiver' chest without the key, but that destroys whatever is inside. So it's not not really good for transportation, but security.

@thurston2235

2 жыл бұрын

If this is an accurate analogy, it really helps me understand it. What I don’t get is why quantum teleport something at all when you still have to send other information classically? Is it only useful for encryption and that’s it?

@michaelpettersson4919

2 жыл бұрын

Of some reason this reminds me of how some shopkeepers in Baldur's Gate shared their inventory. So you could sell an item to one merchant and then buy it back from another... 😉

@WWLinkMasterX

2 жыл бұрын

@@thurston2235 Well, presumably it's physically *unhackable* encryption, which has it's value. And though the cost of the quantum computers needed to do it would exceed most practical expenses, I can see it being worth it for governments handling top secret data. Say, nuclear weapons codes. The other potential benefit depends on the "key" size versus the size of the message. If the "key" is "smaller/shorter" than the message, then that might be useful. There's a great lecture on this site by Microsoft computer scientists explaining the math of it all. It's under 2 hours and is actually *very* approachable.

Maybe they can send them a “quantum Nobel” in the future.

@jcortese3300

2 жыл бұрын

It's a medal that can be either a Nobel Prize or a subway token, but you can't tell which until you open the box and look at it. :-)

@sicfxmusic

2 жыл бұрын

A 50-50 chance of getting the prize

@nairsheasterling9457

2 жыл бұрын

@@sicfxmusic Wait, EA is sponsoring the Nobel prize now?

@OpenBiolabsGuy

2 жыл бұрын

It would be nice if they had a Nobel for Basic Science Research in general. There's no Nobel for Biology. Medicine, yes, but not general biology. There should be Nobel prizes awarded to Ecology research, for example, that have nothing to do with medicine.

@daltonbedore8396

2 жыл бұрын

isn't that more of a Temporal Nobel?

I’ve been discussing this topic intently in the past couple of months with one of my friends actually, and was very excited when I saw the title.

Thanks for this one, Sabine. I've been trying to figure out why quantum teleportation couldn't be used for FTL communications for a long time - you've just explained it in a nutshell for me! The information on the measurement still needs to be transmitted at the speed of light. Much appreciated!!

Congratulations Sabine! Had to think of your video immediately when I just read the news! 😄

Incredibly well done video, as always

@SabineHossenfelder

2 жыл бұрын

Happy you like it!

@soundtrancecloud5101

Жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder 6:14 money? (Could you please elaborate)

@rahulmehta7476

11 ай бұрын

@@soundtrancecloud5101 many, not money

I find your presentation challenging but pitched just at the right level for non specialists willing to make the effort to understand a little more of the marvels of the universe, Thanks.

Teleporting cats to people who need them should be the ultimate goal of science.

@supermushroom3175

2 жыл бұрын

Teleporting cat bellies to be precise should be the ultimate goal

@douginorlando6260

2 жыл бұрын

There are millions of youtube videos that teleport cats into the conscious minds of cat lovers

@Tom_Quixote

2 жыл бұрын

Nobody needs cats. Or dogs.

"Quantum teleportation-" boring... "IN SPACE" Whaaaat?!? gasping emoji

@xpkareem

2 жыл бұрын

Isn't everything in space?

@anam.caballerowilson9421

2 жыл бұрын

Boring ☺️

Thanks Sabine for sharing. I always enjoy your videos.

Didn't you say in another video Einstein wasn't talking about entanglement when he said spooky action at a distance? Or was that just a thought?

@johndoe-pq1pf

2 жыл бұрын

火鍋大王，在中國就不要翻牆了啦

@Miguelitojones1

2 жыл бұрын

de fato, é possível que ela estivesse falando de outra coisa mas não sei dizer com certeza.

@eljcd

2 жыл бұрын

Here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/dqBqptuSobOxfag.html

@MrNati4444

2 жыл бұрын

I think she ment that the spooky action is passing the speed of light with entanglement not the entanglement itself.

@isak9568

2 жыл бұрын

Exaktly! I thought the exakt same thing. Also that entanglement were like sending one sock; you know depending on the one you got, the other one

Top-notch research presented in accessible fashion. Just a great channel by Hossenfelder. Keep up this amazing work.

@silent00planet

Жыл бұрын

not research standard text book material

@brendawilliams8062

7 ай бұрын

I wonder if Bob and Tom are enjoying their knot that Alice agreed with Bob about?

Love your channel. Keeping my fingers crossed for an episode on negative mass.

Fascinating as usual, Sabine. Many thanks.

I can kinda sorta see the benefit of quantum teleportation now. Am I right to say that whatever measurement data you'd have to send is relatively lightweight compared to the information/quantum state that you teleport? Which in turn achieves much faster and more secure means of transporting information and potentially objects?

@SabineHossenfelder

2 жыл бұрын

That's one way to put it, yes.

@epajarjestys9981

2 жыл бұрын

Good question.

@jamestheotherone742

2 жыл бұрын

Sigh... no. Except for maybe something like a cypher key to decrypt information. All "quantum teleportation" does is give you a formula to derive the same results of observation on a similar object's state. An analogy is that Alice and Bob have the same exam questions on a test (entangled pair). Alice sends Bob a cheat sheet of the answers to the questions. Bob can now ace his exam without even looking at his test.

@MarcSylex

2 жыл бұрын

​@@jamestheotherone742 I "love" it when scientists just hand wave over this kind of understanding and treat it as some form of magic.Why? Why do they do this? What's their end game?

@TysonJensen

2 жыл бұрын

@@jamestheotherone742 what killjoy James is actually trying to say is that as far as we know you can’t actually transmit “more” information “faster.” As far as we know, but Sabine herself didn’t commit to that, which is telling. What we know now is that it is a more secure way to send certain information, like encryption keys.

Dr Hossenfelder, your videos are the first thing I watch on the weekend. Thank you so much for them. They always end with me wanting more.

Subscribed, I love finding awesome new channels very informative thank you!

Love your videos, Sabine. Greetings from me and my family here in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

@SabineHossenfelder

2 жыл бұрын

Greetings back to Rio!

@Sabine, please do a video about the Schrödinger equation, before the probabilities were applied to it.

For the first time, we have the engineering and production capability to realize some astounding things with regard to quantum physics. Its going to be a really interesting next twenty years...

@view1st

2 жыл бұрын

It's a case of turning the theorizing and turning it into practical applications. Even then such applications need to be commercialized to make it worthwhile for a company to bring them market.

I just stumble on your channel and I love it! I subscribed

Pretty interesting indeed! 😃 Thanks a lot, Sabine!!! Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

Really great video, thank you! I'm wondering - is there any theory about the density/amount of the measurement outcome information that Alice sends to Bob, compared to the amount of information Bob gets from the uncovering the quantum state on his end? Meaning, can Alice send a smaller amount of measurement information than the amount of quantum state information Bob can uncover by using that measurement outcome information?

As an engineer, I love your presentations, Sabine. They make sense of subjects that would fry my brain.

@noway8233

Жыл бұрын

My is fried yet

Collapsed that wave function over a year ago - excellent work!

Great video again as always sabine, if possible can you do a video on your thoughts and opinions on quantized inertia? I've gotten really I to the topic lately and was wondering how viable it actually is

Complex subject explained in a simple way. Only true experts can do this 👏

@david203

2 жыл бұрын

No, anyone can do it. It takes a true expert to get it right. In the case of physics, almost all physicists get something wrong when it comes to explaining QM experiments for the simple basic reason that our natural physical intuition was not created by functioning the tiny domain of the atom or smaller. It took me a long time to accept such widespread ignorance in physics, because it attempts to be so rigorous and because its primary tool is mathematics, which actually is rigorous and always correct since it is based on the concept of proof. Physics is necessarily based on theory, observation, and correction (the scientific method).

@UsernameXOXO

2 жыл бұрын

@@david203 am I correct in assuming you've never heard of quantum biology?

@david203

2 жыл бұрын

@@UsernameXOXO No, what makes you think that? I am especially interested in how QM makes photosynthesis much more efficient.

Thank you Sabine for broadening my horizons even further. I love physics but am not intelligent enough to take it any further than a hobby. In a way I guess I'm more into theoretical physics as I spend a lot of time thinking about things I don't understand!

@valentinmalinov8424

2 жыл бұрын

Don't put down your ability to understand my friend! Currently, nobody understands Quantum Mechanics! It is illogical, because using incorrectly defined fundamental elements. Everything starts making sense when the fundamental elements are correctly defined. Quantum entanglement is very easy to be understood. If you are interested, just find my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

@stevealston201

2 жыл бұрын

@@valentinmalinov8424 Thanks for that I'm bi polar & don't think much of myself these are my escape from humanity as I don't quite fit in

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevealston201 Honestly, one of the reasons I'm a huge fan of Sabine is that she is not like other 'normal' people, and neither am I, nor are many people who are good friends of mine. I hope you find fellow nonconformists to spend time with online and in the flesh. And have patience with learning this stuff, it does add up over months, I've found. I am slightly less of an idiot than I was this time last year. :-9

@kevinbissinger

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevealston201 bipolar is one of the most common misdiagnoses for someone who is autistic and has childhood trauma. as such if you feel like the bipolar treatment just seems to make you feel worse and less relatable you might want to do some research on autism and you might find out you're not as alone or different as you think. just with the wrong people.

Thank you! Great video

Interesting stuff. Thankyou Sabine.

The Science is real; Sabine's blouse is hypergeometric.

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

When you can't understand a topic and Sabine's flair is a welcome distraction XD

@BigZebraCom

2 жыл бұрын

@@CAThompson I can't undertstand science as I am a Zebra.

@gregeconomeier1476

2 жыл бұрын

Looking at her blouse? Bad boy. Ha ha. :-)

@larryscott3982

2 жыл бұрын

Her blouse works. Works well.

@brendawilliams8062

2 жыл бұрын

I believe ‘Go’ is in the middle. Is she a player? Lol

"Citations higher now than ever" could just be due to exponential rise in number of papers

@GepardenK

2 жыл бұрын

Sure, but that exponential rise in papers is still citing that particular study. So however you look at it there is exponentially more work being done from that particular foundation.

@du42bz

2 жыл бұрын

Someone should plot the ratio between the amount of papers written and the citations of this one paper

@billyt8868

2 жыл бұрын

yea that’s sort of the her point haha. people are doing research…. also i don’t think nuance on the topic is lost on her she’s just making a point. you have an anime pfp sit down.

@WorthlessWinner

2 жыл бұрын

@@billyt8868 - i agree she knows this, but she should mention it, since it totally undermines her point. Almost everything paper will be cited more as time goes on, because there's exponentially more papers to do the citing as time goes on.

@aniksamiurrahman6365

2 жыл бұрын

Very good point though, but its on the news too. So may be there's some actual rise of citation after all.

I love that graph of EPR citation rate over time. Einstein may have been wrong about spooky action at a distance, but he was right that understanding entanglement would eventually be key to progress in the field.

Thank u so much for doing this

Hi Sabine, since time and space are linked via spacetime, can two particles become entangled in the time domain and not just the space domain? Forgive my ignorance (which is limitless unfortunately) but it seems to me that some kind of temporal entanglement might explain the double slit/quantum eraser experiment results. Apologies for the wild speculation but I haven't been able to find any info regarding the possibility of temporal superposition and why it may or may not exist anywhere.

This is really excellent. Sabine, thank you so much!

Hello Sabine? When are you going to do Live? Just wanted to say You make Physics Beautiful. I had all your song in my playlist

It's important to note that quantum teleportation is not a cloning technique. If for example quantum teleportation techniques are ever advanced to the point where all the information about a physical object can be extracted and used to recreate an exact copy of the object at a different location, then the process of extracting that information will in effect destroy the original (or at least leave it in state that is unrecognizable from its original state). No need to lose sleep wondering what would happen if you were teleported to your favorite vacation spot, and upon returning home you were greeted at the door by yourself.

Quantum mirror on the wall, who is the cleverest of us all.

"Quantum mechanics is booming!" I said. My clever cat overheard me and fled.

@georgelionon9050

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe the cat didn't flee, did you look? Maybe the cat is now in a superposition of having fled or not.

@devinbarlow381

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgelionon9050 EXACTLY! This IS a site about our inability to truly KNOW DEFINITEIVELY anything, anyway! Besides, kittamons DO already understand their orientation in our Universe!

@maxdoubt5219

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgelionon9050 Ha! Y're a wit.

@pongmaster123

2 жыл бұрын

she's still traumatized from schrödinger

@herwighuener3256

2 жыл бұрын

One should not mention cats in the context of quantum mechanics - this is widely regarded as politicaly incorrect. Nowadays, one uses lawyers for that purpose.

Since Dr. Sabin would not provide the list of the papers she sited in the video, here is the list for anyone interested: 2:11 Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? 4:10 On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox. 9:20 Experimental Realization of Teleporting an Unknown Pure Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolosky-Rosen channel.(DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1121) 9:20 Experimental quantum teleportation (DOI: 10.1038/37539) 9:27 First Object Teleported from Earth to Orbit - MIT technology review. The research article of 9:27 news: Ground-to-satelite quantum teleportation. (DOI: 10.1038/nature23675)

@eljcd

2 жыл бұрын

Nice! Thanks for your work!

Amazing video, thanks!

10:20 Are you part of the Nobel prize committee? Good prediction, you were right!

The most important achievement of the quantum science is to close plot holes caused by lazy story wirting in science fiction movies. "This is impossible!" "No. Because we use quantum [random buzzword]."

@brothermine2292

2 жыл бұрын

"Quantum" buzzword is needed when "temporal" buzzword is insufficient.

@georgelionon9050

2 жыл бұрын

And in fantasy it's now because of quantum magic.

Interesting video pushing the horizon of understanding.

Thank You Dr Hossenfelder I NEVER miss one of your videos.

question: suppose that the sender and the receiver plan out far in advance exactly what measurement types they will do on what entangled pairs. with this sort of pre scripting, could quantum teleportation then be used to send new inormation faster than light?

@loweel2897

2 жыл бұрын

information cannot travel faster than light, on the other side, you don't' need to know how fast it travels.

@SabineHossenfelder

2 жыл бұрын

No, you need the measurement outcome from one side and send it to the other side. You don't know what the outcome is in advance.

@tetraedri_1834

2 жыл бұрын

To further elaborate, sequence of measurements needed to be done on the receiver side depends on the measurement outcome in the sender side. So it doesn't help receiver at all to know what sender does

@georgelionon9050

2 жыл бұрын

No you can't, because you can't force the outcome of the measurement. But if the sender and receiver later meet up and compare notebooks, they'll see that they match.

@quickmana

2 жыл бұрын

I was thinking it still wouldn't be faster than light because of the information exchange that took place earlier happened slower than light, but still an interesting idea to turn something small into something big -- quantum compression? :)

Scientist vs Fanatic *scientific* - what is the question? - then x is the answer *fanatic* - x is the answer to everything - what was your question?

@raphaelklaussen1951

2 жыл бұрын

Excellent, that is precisely how 80 trumptards approach everything.

@georgelionon9050

2 жыл бұрын

science is the answer to everything. what was you question?

@talldarkhansome1

2 жыл бұрын

Jesus is the answer. A+ my son. Carry on.

Thanks for the video :)

Crazy! this video is from one year ago. Thanks

It would be very nice to have video about loopholes in bell experiments. Because there are plenty of them, and experiments handle several of them but not all at once. My favorite is following: proposed way of measurement is random, but most of experiments actually do multiple experiments with fixed way of measurement. Of course you could calculate expectation value by rearranging sum, but you can't claim that rearranging experiment doesn't have any side-effects.

I thought entanglement was just a form of correlation, while "spooky action at a distance" referred to the collapse of the waveform for any measurement.

@valentinmalinov8424

2 жыл бұрын

Quantum entanglement is very easy to be understood. If you are interested, just find my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

@jamestheotherone742

2 жыл бұрын

Yes. "spooky action at a distance" was a singularly poor analogy for the concept Einstein was trying to express. Almost as bad as Schrodinger's Cat. It enabled quantum mechanics literalism instead of disputing it as was intended.

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

@@jamestheotherone742 That's what Sabine explained in an earlier video about the measurement getting updated rather than the entanglement itself.

@mudkip_btw

2 жыл бұрын

@@valentinmalinov8424 sounds like there will be lots of half-explanations in that book

@Ni999

2 жыл бұрын

@@mudkip_btw He's a quack.

Happy to see you laying the ground about Superdeterminism. I'm just a physics enthusiast, but have already watched your seminar "Rethinking Superdeterminism" and it's what makes more sense to me about Quantum Mechanics, because it preserves both realism and locality. Either that or the Many Worlds Interpretation, but you have already stated in a previous video that MWI doesn't resolve the measurement problem.

@brothermine2292

2 жыл бұрын

Why does superdeterminism make more sense to you than nonlocality?

@Davidsasz1239

2 жыл бұрын

@@brothermine2292 Because nonlocality implies faster than light interactions without faster than light communication in order to not violate Einsteins' General Relativity

@yziib3578

2 жыл бұрын

@@Davidsasz1239 there are many thing that happen at a quantum level, that are impossible at a macroscopic level, so why not non-locality.

@brothermine2292

2 жыл бұрын

@@Davidsasz1239 : Nonlocality does NOT imply something traveled faster than light. We don't understand space or spacetime well enough to know that there aren't shortcuts (for example, wormholes) connecting distant points of space or connecting distant points of a quantum field.

Well done - what a brilliant prediction!

"Do you just put the word 'quantum' before anything?" - Antman

u da best Sabine

@voidremoved

2 жыл бұрын

Alice is hot

Very cool Sabine. I hope you find/discover what you are learning/researching in your study/experiments. Hey, quantum teleportation will eliminate vehicles and roads. Welcome to the digital age of traffic jams lol. Thank you for the updated information. It is really interesting to see how much consciousness understands today with the passing of knowledge from one generation to the next. And even though it takes a few more generations of consciousness to think it out in the future. Good to see old knowledge is preserved.

Thank you for this video.

Would be nice to know what the "measurement" actually entails. Is it just some numerical value or is it some complicated value expressed as a function? This always bugged me.

@gehirndoper

2 жыл бұрын

Probably something like "Do you measure the polarisation in the horizontal or the vertical axis".

@theondono

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, it would be nice knowing, but no one really knows 😂

Really missed the "yes, this guy again"

Thanks for the eye-opening explanation. :)

Love your work. Thank you.

Came here after today’s Nobel prize announcement. Guess you were right!

Looking forward to the non-quantum revolution!

@sicfxmusic

2 жыл бұрын

Then you have to look back

Quantum teleportation nicely explained. Thanks Sabine!

Thank you for explaining Bell’s theorem simply, perhaps you could make an in-depth explanation of it?

I mean, I get how Bell's Inequality works, but I don't understand it? I think I know how it works with Superdeterminism? Help? I still enjoyed the video of course. That cannon sounds awesome with my new headphones at any rate. :-)

@SabineHossenfelder

2 жыл бұрын

"no superdeterminism" is one of the assumptions for Bell's theorem. So with superdeterminism, it doesn't work, basically.

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder Thanks :)

@Schokland2007

2 жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder Dear Sabine, will you marry me? I love you!

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

@@Schokland2007 She's already married, and there is no reason for anyone to want to marry some random on the internet. Ew.

@Schokland2007

2 жыл бұрын

@@CAThompson serious guy you are!

Trying to define reality with QM is equivalent to trying to describe the ocean by studying fish and seaweed.

@cowlinator

2 жыл бұрын

Perhaps. And there is no alternative.

@valentinmalinov8424

2 жыл бұрын

Quantum Mechanics start to make sense only if you have correctly defined fundamental elements. Modern science is using incorrect defined fundamental elements and is running in "puzzles" and "mysteries" Quantum entanglement is very easy to be understood. If you are interested, just find my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

@AmbivalentInfluence

2 жыл бұрын

@@valentinmalinov8424 My point is not about how easy or difficult QM is to understand, it is about seeing it in the correct perspective.

@AmbivalentInfluence

2 жыл бұрын

@@cowlinator The 'alternative' is being studied, but that work is not seen in the correct perpective (IMO). The 'ocean' includes the Higgs Boson, the Higgs field, dark matter, dark energy, the 'vacuum', black holes, the ultra cold, gravitational waves and mass, none of which have a quantum definition. Reality is not made from sparkles, it is made of spacetime.

@valentinmalinov8424

2 жыл бұрын

@@AmbivalentInfluence Yes my friend, but unfortunately, they - (not me) is the ones who say that nobody understands Quantum Mechanics. I am offering correct fundamental principles, which on easy therms explaining all these currently unsolved puzzles. Regards

Sabine is a remarkable educator. I'm happy to find these older video, that let ne understand what QM is about.

Excellent.... madam you are 100% right... all you three predicted in this video 1 year ago , got noble prize 2022... thanks.

I know! Sabine is a Fremen !?! The blueish glow in her eye… Sabine, i see you… Your a user of the “spice Melange”!

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

She does have a ridiculous amount of knowledge.

@gjolau

2 жыл бұрын

@@CAThompson She may be a “mentat”

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

@@gjolau Wouldn't surprise me. :)

I liked when the lady said "high Albert" to his portrait. Nobel Prize has been managed very bad for decades by politicians - useless reward.

Yaaaay! Thanks Sabine!

Very inspiring video!

Tut tut! There are two serious conceptual errors in that description of EPR(B). Firstly, it fails "the ping pong ball test": there's nothing peculiar about bipartite systems having (antii-)correlated properties no matter how far apart the component systems are. In order to grasp what's interesting about the quantum - entangled - case it's crucial to understand that for entanglement to occur it's necessary that there be (at least two) incompatible observables of each component involved. Secondly, and relatedly but slightly more subtly, it's important to understand that it's not true that the outcome of the observation on one component system determines the *value* of the corresponding property on the other. It determines the *outcome* of the corresponding measurement *if that measurement is done*.

I thought "spooky action at a distance" WASN'T about entanglement. Has Sabine changed her mind?

@locutusdborg126

2 жыл бұрын

No, it is about entanglement.

@zeideerskine3462

2 жыл бұрын

Can you really know where exactly somebody stands on an issue And how fast the person is changing its mind?

@johnkeck

2 жыл бұрын

Right. Is it a false memory or did she say something like that recently?

@brendanward2991

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnkeck Sabine made a video on the subject recently. kzread.info/dash/bejne/dqBqptuSobOxfag.html

@johnkeck

2 жыл бұрын

​@@brendanward2991 Maybe we should give her a break. You have to admit it's a real challenge to keep one's attention-grabbing one-liners straight! Lol

Interesting. Thank you!

Another great presentation. A great use for quantum teleportation is presented in Cixin Liu's novel "Three Body Problem". I won't give it away. BTW I just started your "Lost In Math"

So, Sabine transmits information to me. I have only a vague understanding of the information. She was not aware beforehand how poor is my understanding. So quantum theory is not violated. Is that right?

@CAThompson

2 жыл бұрын

Did I transmit my nonplussed state to you, or vice versa?

Alles ist quantum. Lang lebe Einstein!

Love you, this is so tied in with my spiritual practices I cannot even begin to tell you because you would not believe it ❤️

fabulous presentations.

Quantum wrenches tools needed for the mechanics

@Vix2066

2 жыл бұрын

Lol

Videos like this make me wish I had majored in physics.

@jongya

2 жыл бұрын

@Parker Sullins and if everyone thought that way no one would be an NBA player, I’m in my first year of a physics PhD and I very much hope that one day I’ll advance the field (even in just some small way) but if I turn out to not have that intuitive spark to make a difference then I’ll happily turn to teaching what I do know and understand in the hopes that the next generation will figure out what I could not.

@jongya

2 жыл бұрын

@Parker Sullins one of the things I love about physics and science in general is that everyone can participate. Even if someone can’t make the intuitive leaps to discover something new, I’d say everyone has the ability to learn what’s already been discovered it’s just a matter of hard work and interest. Keeping people as receptacles for information they can distribute may not be as flashy as exploration but it’s still an important wonderful contribution to humanity

Interesting and worthwhile video.

Yes - I fully agree on your Nobel-List … In other matters: Did you already do a clip on Nick Herbert's patent application for "superluminal communication", and the - finally killing - "No-Cloning Theorem" (by Wootters et al, and others)? Sabine: fantastic channel!