you are saving me from entirely failing this class i wish all profs could teach like you do

OMG I freakingggg love you...I am currently studying for my masters in Linguistics and finallyyyyyyy I feel like I can actually understand syntax!!!!

@tiberseptim8434

4 жыл бұрын

Stephanie Vargas That’s not fair i have to do this for my damn B.Ed in English, and the question I ask myself the most is Why the fuck do I need this for a B.Ed? I’m not studying linguistics :‘D

@yourway382

3 жыл бұрын

@@tiberseptim8434 hahaha

@theosoreos

3 жыл бұрын

@@tiberseptim8434 I relate to this so much that it hurtsssss

@TheTinyTimmyTimTim

2 жыл бұрын

@@tiberseptim8434 I have a midterm in 12 hours, I hope its going well for you haha.

@MissMeghoo

2 ай бұрын

@tiberseptim8434 the very same for B.Ed and this is a core course kmt

Thank you very much for the crystal clear explanation... You are a grade saver...

How helpful video is!!! Thank you so much!!!! I can completely understand this!!!!

Trev Tutor manages to explain Complementiser Phrases very clearly.

Thanks for your explanation! Very helpful

You kind sir are a god among humans. Thank you so much, you are gonna save my degree.

This is very well organized, can I ask what app and/or software you used to draw?

@yourway382

3 жыл бұрын

Yes please

Great job. What application are you using for the presentation? It's perfect for the virtual classes nowadays.

7:15 so clutch right here, this helped so much

Please tell me the types of sentence s whether these sentences having embeded clause or complementizer phrases are simple or complex

Aren't you skipping T' and T before the VP?

thank you so much!

How about T -> +pst (+past tense) and "died" becomes "die"? That was stated in the book i've been studying

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

Yes, T' and T levels are explained in other videos. The focus of this one was just to introduce CPs so I did not worry about T movement.

How do I explain the role of CP in direct and indirect questions?

I have question but first I like to thank you its clear but my question is when we draws tree diagram and write cp at the first should we delete the cp in bottom and how the structure will be ?

What is TP , are they the same with IP -inflectional projection

Awesome !

Great upload more videos on cp sir

Could you explain what is DP?

Hi Trev! Thanks for uploading the video man you are awesome! Can I ask a quick question please? How do we know which verbs must take a CP as a complement? From the patterns followed it seems to be following any linking verbs? It seems quite counter-intuitive to create complementizer phrases for particular verb types under particular circumstances. Does this hypothesus suggest creating a Complementiser Phrase for every instance of such verbs? For example in the sentences: "I do not believe it" or 'I persuaded him' or 'I think he believes me' creates a fragment clause without noun or verb phrase. Thanks

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

"I do not believe it" or 'I persuaded him' are complete sentences. 'I think he believes me' is a good example of a sentence that needs a CP. [I think [(that) he believes me]]. The complementizer "that" is optional in this case.

@MichaelWilliams2

6 жыл бұрын

I guess what I'm asking is, surely it would only be accurate (and probably easier) to determine the transitivity of a verb based on the antecedent context of the CP. For example in the sentence, 'John does know the answer' we have [John][does know the answer] creates "the answer" as an adverb phrase for "know". Whereas in the phrase "John does know the answer is yellow" creates "the answer is yellow" as a complemetiser phrase for the verb "know".

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

Yeah some verbs have multiple complement options. In the first sentence you have "know" taking an NP complement, but in the second there is a CP complement. Verbs like "want", or "believe" will work the same. Sorry I didn't understand your question at first.

@MichaelWilliams2

6 жыл бұрын

Dude, awesome. Thank you so much for responding and so quickly as well! Thanks

3:46 Do you use Verb Shell for "ditransitive verbs"?

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

Not at this point. Maybe in an Advanced Syntax series.

you are awesome

I love you so much

Ok but his voice. 🔥

@yourway382

3 жыл бұрын

😱

Hello, I really liked your explanation. But still I have a very important question to do! Well I'm about to finish my degree and this is the only subject left. And I can't understand why or when CP is needed? Why generative grammaticians decided to use de CP if there is no Complementizer in a phrase. So for example in a phrase like "Have you seen her?" Why do we start the derivation from a CP? Does this mean we need to use ALWAYS CP as the main projection of a tree analysis? I would appreciate a quick answer for this :) thank you!

@Vivaldi4

6 жыл бұрын

My educated guess is that it could have something to do with the generative character of language = the fact that we could possibly build a neverending sentence. That allows us to include a clause (making it a constituent) into our neverending one making the one that was just included a complement of higher structure!? Than there would be a requirement to have a free slot for a complemetizer. BUT I am not 100% sure. I am new to GT grammar, X´ and all this stuff. Correct me if I am wrong. I am curious as well.

@agustinaquintero37

2 жыл бұрын

I have the same doubt

I want you to draw the tree for the sentence that contains adjunct

Should we start drawing every tree with "CP"?

In 04:00 Did you purposely omit T’ -> T -> [+past] under the root TP ? Same question for the embedded TP. Shouldn’t it have a daughter T’, sister to DP, which in turn should have two daughters, a T and VP? Have u uploaded any tutorial on non-finite, especially infinitives and gerunds, in sentences like I ordered him to bring me wine. I cannot stop watching your videos. I hate ordering him. If not, it would be nice to make a video on that topic. Thanks for any response!

What I want to know is when the complementizer that is optional, and when it is obligatory. Although I know the answer intuitively, a syntactic account of this linguistic phenomenon would more practical and reliable.

@agustinaquintero37

2 жыл бұрын

Me too!! I asked the same. As in the case : the book(that) you bought

@MohamedAli-rd7rn

Жыл бұрын

Thanks a bunch for all your support, your e lectures are definitely useful. 👌 On top of that you are super extraordinary human beings ❤️ I really appreciate your time and you ❤️

what is the TP?

So in the case of The man that eats pudding is full. Do we use NP to represent "that eats pudding"? do we not introduce that in a CP? I'm confused since this is a TP and has an adjunct

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

"that eats pudding" is a CP-adjunct attached to the NP "man". There is movement within that TP which is explained in one of the later videos, which is why there's not much detail in it other than showing what a relative clause is.

@fatmiabid3578

5 жыл бұрын

In which video does that explained?

Can I contact you??? I am stuck in tree diagrams of CP

thaaaaaaaaaaaaank uuuuu

at 2:58 , Shouldn't we add one more V' because of "great" is an adjunct?

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

It is a complement of "is" in this case.

@vanlera

6 жыл бұрын

Gotcha, thanks! And also I couldn't find "distinctive rules" in phonology videos. Is it in a different title? Or does it exist in your videos? Thanks again.

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

not sure what a "distinctive rule" is, but there is a video on "phonological rules" in [Phonology] that uses features, if that's what you mean.

@vanlera

6 жыл бұрын

Yep, I just checked out and that was exactly what I meant. Thanks a lot, I hope we see more Linguistics in your channel!

@MichaelWilliams2

6 жыл бұрын

Isn't it correct that it should be an adjunct? I have read to believe that a verb phrase may only take a prepositional phrase or a noun phrase as its compliment? www.unlweb.net/wiki/X-bar_theory

What about (if) tree diagrams

@Trevtutor

7 ай бұрын

Replace “that” with “if” under C and it will look the same.

Why do you use DeterminerPhrase now instead of simply NounPhrase for "I" or "John"?

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

See DP Hypothesis video. NPs are actually DPs with the way constituents work.

@izazahmed3417

5 жыл бұрын

I just watched the DP hypothesis video. The DP contains a determiner as head of the phrase. But in the case of I or John, there is no determiner to begin with in the first place. I am confused.

@izazahmed3417

5 жыл бұрын

@@Trevtutor Can't we simply treat a proper noun or a pronoun as NP?

@xoTalim

4 жыл бұрын

@@izazahmed3417 Idk if you still need an answer to this if you're still studying Syntax, but when I learned DPs, my prof told me that nouns in DPs ALWAYS need a determiner. If there isn't one (like in "John is happy"), then you would still draw a branch down as if there IS a determiner for John, label it D, and then where the word "the" would be, you'd just put the null symbol like he shows at 6:40 under "C".

I thought TPs were supposed to be I(NFL) phrases? Which of these is more accepted?

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

TP is more common in the generative syntax crowd.

what does TP mean?

@Trevtutor

7 жыл бұрын

tense phrase

if "that" is a S in a sentence, for ex: That is the school where i was taught. How to draw a tree diagram of this sentence? Can you help me? Thank you

in the last sentence you didn't include a null T' ? why? can you please explain

@Trevtutor

7 жыл бұрын

I didn't include T for any of the trees in this video. I formally introduce them in the next video, so I removed them from this lesson to keep the focus on "C" and "CPs". I probably could have included them, but it would have made the trees much larger.

@merryrose6052

7 жыл бұрын

thank you ^^

The man who eats pudding.

Doesn’t the tree for ‘John is great’ missing a T’?

Teacher, what does ‘ DP’ mean ?

@arwahussein4613

5 жыл бұрын

Determiner Phrase

Excuse me! What is DP? I really need help.

What class is “to be” ?????

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

As in "I have to be there at 1:00PM"? It's just a main verb in that case.

3:32 instead of DP, can I write NP I feel like DP is a lot more complicated. Thanks in advance And also you made a mistake in the Adjunct part, AP is the daughter of V' and sister of V' not just V.

@4ll3sb4n4n3

4 жыл бұрын

Just NP triangle doesn't work there. You can write out DP triangle to DP - D' - D [proper] NP - N' - N John NP always needs a DP so you can't leave out DP.

@ciel_nadouch5648

4 жыл бұрын

@@4ll3sb4n4n3 yeah thank you so much

Also why TensedPhrase instead of InflectionalPhrase?

@Trevtutor

6 жыл бұрын

TP and IP are pretty much the same. TP is standard.

@vladotz

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks a lot for the clarification!

@chayma5594

6 жыл бұрын

I have the same question

How about when the sentence starts with 'that' as a complementizer? As in: That you like gory videos bothers me. What would a tree for that look like? Would it be possible for an entire CP constituent to move to a DP position?

Sir, why can't we classify , I, as NP instead of DP as it doesn't have a determined. Similarly, why can't we classify John as NP instead of DP

@Trevtutor

Ай бұрын

Some theories do, but modern transformational grammar treats proper names and pronouns as determiners. Giuseppe (1994) and Cardinaletti & Starke (1999) were major influences for this. It's a little complicated.

Are you Jim Helbert?

But what about...'There is nothing( that) I can do'. That as a contact relative clause. You used a clause with a verb tought, but you didn't explain that in relative clauses

T'?

.