Also, it's not 'misinformation' it's called LIES/LYING. Let's just call it out for what it is.

@beyondpc9421

5 күн бұрын

Misinformation is classified as factual but unwanted (by someone). Disinformation are lies. They don't want the truth to get out it's bad for PR.

@sebastiansaxon

5 күн бұрын

You mean like when the government told everyone that the jab prevents transmission? Like that kind of lie?

@cheesehead4670

5 күн бұрын

@@sebastiansaxon🤡🤣

@AndrewShepherdODAS

5 күн бұрын

​@@sebastiansaxonclown show. You people

@tparbs

5 күн бұрын

You mean like Hunter Biden's laptop? Which turned out to be true?

We need a truth in media law similar to truth in advertising already in place.

@cattymajiv

5 күн бұрын

There used to be one. If the US and Canada do have such laws for advertising then why the F do they not ever enforce them? The lying goes on to such an extreme extent that it's the rule, not an exception!

@Over.It.999

5 күн бұрын

Yes, why is it legal for corporations to run “news” outlets peddling misinformation?

@AndrewShepherdODAS

5 күн бұрын

Thank Ronald Reagan for getting rid of that law

People should get off social media.

@seharraallgood618

5 күн бұрын

As you post on one 🤣

@rorysimpson8716

5 күн бұрын

You first.

@melindaboyer385

5 күн бұрын

Says a person whose on it right now😂

@Runny117

5 күн бұрын

@@seharraallgood618 People forget that this is still social media lol. one of these days I tell myself I'll just watch the video and not look at the comments section. today is not that day

@goettling

5 күн бұрын

You are on it now

Truth is tyranny in the empire of lies. So who gets to decide what’s true?

Free speech doesn't mean you get to spread dangerous lies that could cost people their lives or damage property.

@KuariThunderclaw

5 күн бұрын

Hell, the decision doesn't even go that far. It was never about the government punishing anyone for these things. It was about them reaching out to social media companies, and saying "Hey, this is dangerous, this is why, can you please keep an eye out and deal with it?" That's it... that's literally all the government was doing. Would have been within the platforms rights to say no. The idea that they can't even ASK is beyond silly when frankly, there are some things they SHOULD be allowed to do more than ask because of the danger involved.

@MichaelWinter-ss6lx

5 күн бұрын

Why? You have the right to get sued any time you like.

@laveraparato258

5 күн бұрын

Many of the so-called lies that were removed have proven to be facts.

@jpaynter149

5 күн бұрын

So much for the Christian upbringing I had when those supposed Christians are behind spreading what they know are damaging lies on social media just to get their way. Shame shame shame…has social media returned us to the Stone Age?

@mseibert100

5 күн бұрын

It then who decides that….

Finally! Social media should be held to certain standards.

What happens when they find out that the information was correct ? How to they remedy that ?

One more thing, of course you want no information given about the Supreme Court selling justice.

@LadyElizondo

5 күн бұрын

Misinformation is lying. If someone is telling the truth and they have verifiable proof that a justice is selling influence, none of this applies to them.

@RocRizzo

5 күн бұрын

The US has been for sale to the highest bidder since the days of Ronnie Rat Raygun.

@StephenSankojr

5 күн бұрын

👍😎​@@RocRizzo

@JasonJenkins-fp2vx

5 күн бұрын

I trust nobody ever.

@StephenSankojr

5 күн бұрын

@@JasonJenkins-fp2vx Don't know if I feel like that Jason, but you got me thinking. Sad situation these days isn't it.

this is concerning if it applies to a whistleblower and they were deemed "false information"

@Col_Crunch

5 күн бұрын

There is nothing concerning about it. The question posed in the case is "can the federal government contact social media companies and request they do something?" it was not "can the federal government order a post removed from social media?"

@shannonfrink7939

5 күн бұрын

@@Col_Crunch the federal government’s “requests” are rarely “requests.”

It seems to me that just as the Government has a RESPONSIBILITY to protect the public from unsafe substances in the food supply, and dangerous products in the marketplace, there is a duty to intervene when unsafe, misleading, or provably false information is disseminated to the public in general. Free speech does have its limits where public safety and welfare is involved ed. After all the Preamble does explicitly include "promoting the general welfare" if the people.

@Rustea314

5 күн бұрын

Smoking enhances lung function. Climate change is a myth created by grant seeking scientist. Motor is perfectly safe. An organized mob is a corporation; end Citizens United.

@ross-carlson

5 күн бұрын

100% CORRECT.

@rwacarolina

5 күн бұрын

I agree 100%. The freedom of speech does not equal the freedom to tell lies. Especially when it could threaten the health and/or safety of any American. We need a Constitutional amendment directly shuts that crap down.

@countessk

5 күн бұрын

Very well worded!

@justrosy5

5 күн бұрын

I partly agree with you and partly disagree. See my comment on the OP.

And remember it works both ways…lies can end up causing unnecessary suffering and even violence without any basis of truth ….

Has it been established how "misinformation" will be flagged and who will have this responsibility? This is the danger.

@AurenGlytterkat

5 күн бұрын

Agreed 100%. We are watching free speech die.

I CONSIDER FACEBOOK AND ALL SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORKS A LETHAL WEAPON

@jeffreycaudle5108

5 күн бұрын

Same as the human mouth. If I remember correctly the Bible has something to say about the tongue.

Tell us who the 3 judges are that voted for the social media companies.

@TheWillvoss

5 күн бұрын

Uh, all the ones getting trips and kids tuition paid / bribes openly.

@herlandercarvalho

5 күн бұрын

You can look it up you know... "Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the court that the states and other parties did not have the legal right, or standing, to sue. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented." SOURCE: "The Supreme Court rules for Biden administration in a social media dispute with conservative states", Associated Press

@Hyperpandas

5 күн бұрын

You can read the decision once it's up. Both the majority and minority positions.

@trmentry

5 күн бұрын

Majority Barrett, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Jackson Dissent Alito, joined by Thomas, Gorsuch

@terrencekane8203

5 күн бұрын

Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch. Did you expect anything else?

But what does the federal government deem misinformation?

@DBF68YT

5 күн бұрын

Look up the definition of misinformation. It has to do with stating information that goes against established facts. It's not a tough topic to understand.

@travisfisher2877

5 күн бұрын

@@DBF68YTthat is the definition of misinformation however that is not what they deem misinformation. It’s information they don’t like basically. Remember the hunter laptop story they said was misinformation? Yeah that same laptop was used to convict him a couple of weeks ago so that definitely was not by definition misinformation.

Who will decide if a piece of information is misinformed?

@secretweapon7764

5 күн бұрын

It's pretty easy to make an attempt to validate information. If your "source" is some guy on the internet said it. Then it's probably not reliable.

@user-zb9lv3gh8s

5 күн бұрын

Well, if it's telling you to take horse dewormers to treat a virus, it's probably misinformation.

@lostnlove2309

5 күн бұрын

Most of the time it’s not that hard to figure it out. And there’s always something called fact checkers.

@askani21

5 күн бұрын

Reality..? You can verify if an info is true or not. Reality exists, truth exists. It's not all opinions and vibes and feelings.

@roellopez3737

5 күн бұрын

Learn to think for yourself 😂😂 it’s easy .

Are you even going to address the actual ruling or just give biased spin?

@Col_Crunch

5 күн бұрын

They literally did. The ruling said that the plaintiffs lacked standing, and that the government has every right to communicate with social media companies, and even make requests of them. It is a mind numbingly simple and common sense ruling.

What a dang joke

I hope that this will be used as precedent to force so-called "news" outlets from spreading misinformation, too.

@scottbrown71260

5 күн бұрын

Fat chance of that.

@MichaelWinter-ss6lx

5 күн бұрын

I'm not so sure. For SC the _word_ weighs more than meaning. If they say "Social Media", then its only that. I'd say "publications"; thats what this is, as well as news or TV.

@Col_Crunch

5 күн бұрын

Nothing about this case has anything to do with forcing anyone to do anything. The precedent set is literally "the government has the right to ASK that a company do something". The company has the right to say no.

Who gets to decide what is truth?

@Col_Crunch

5 күн бұрын

Well on a private platform that isn't all that relevant. Also, this ruling literally just gives the government the same right any user has. If you felt strongly about something you found on social media you can make the same requests of the company that the government does.

*sweats in Truth Social*

We want a smart and correctly informed country not idiots..😊

Misinformation is subjective, always will be. Give it a few years and you find out it was true information.

At this point, the Supreme Court sessions should be televised! Why not??? What is the excuse??? It's like in the Wizard of Oz when the curtain is pulled back 🤔

@MF-qf7bs

5 күн бұрын

You can listen to the decisions being argued, but there's a lot of legalese that spoken. Not that actually watching would help you understand the arguments. You really need to understand the law to understand the responses to the Justices questions. But if you listen to the questions and responses and you possess the intellect, you can understand what point they're trying to make, what they're getting at and if you pay enough attention, what they're trying to do. Some of it is quite shocking. And not in a good way. I stopped listening because it was scary and depressing. The Justices have way too much power and not nearly enough ethics or respect for the law that they should have.

Personally, I think the government has not just the right, but the responsibility to request false and fake information be removed, or at least notify that it is protested.

@MF-qf7bs

5 күн бұрын

They do have the responsibility and have departments whose sole task is to track down feeds that provide Russian and Chinese propaganda bots, sites pretending to be American spreading disinformation. But it's like playing whack-a-mole and made more difficult when media business don't cooperate (or worse, propagates the mis-information for their own ends) and protects these sites/bots because they generate clicks which translates into PROFITS,.

@shannonfrink7939

5 күн бұрын

@@randallthomas5207 but the government called Hunter Biden’s laptop fake and disinformation and shut that down. But it wasn’t fake. So where is the guarantee that the government gets it right every time? Because they won’t. And some of what they get wrong and label as fake might be very important.

OMG! what Truthsocial will do now???

Ok. Only one problem. Who decides what is dis/mis information. The government has shown itself willing to lie and so has big business. And then there are those who believe what they say. Just a meaningless ruling that helps no one but those curious about what the wording of the law means.

@markstevens1729

5 күн бұрын

And now we see the results of weaponizing the 1st Amendment. It legitimizes lying.

@user-zb9lv3gh8s

5 күн бұрын

Unfortunately most of the rules for government work on the assumption that the politicians are at least partially motivated by the public good. But then you have a Trump administration come along and what can you do?

@garylefevers

5 күн бұрын

@user-zb9lv3gh8s, fair point. The trump years simply underscore the fact that some people do not care about the common people, only caring for themselves and their bank accounts.

@marnie8007

5 күн бұрын

Well it shouldn't be the people wearing tin foil hats. So some people will be disappointed but we have to pull out of this nose dive into idiocracy.

@christopherzhu3220

5 күн бұрын

We're living in an imperfect world with imperfect rules. If everyone had perfect access to information, this would be a non issue. The best shot we have at getting to know the truth is to have the government handle it and trust that it knows how to fact check appropriately. And if it does do something wrong, we are at least able to follow the public paper trails in government. Anything privitized will have the risk of bias and be influenced by parties that are not for the public good. We have much less power influencing major tech companies if they decide to side with a foreign power...

How will this affect Truth Social i wonder......

Misinformation equals plain old lies, lies lies, lies.

Unfair. The government should not have rights over private companies

@MichaelWinter-ss6lx

5 күн бұрын

Rigged! A never before seen clown hunt! by much troubled judges!

Led by ACB but who were the dissenters?

@herlandercarvalho

5 күн бұрын

You can look it up you know... "Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the court that the states and other parties did not have the legal right, or standing, to sue. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented." SOURCE: "The Supreme Court rules for Biden administration in a social media dispute with conservative states", Associated Press

@Durufle68

5 күн бұрын

Majority Barrett, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Jackson Dissent Alito, joined by Thomas, Gorsuch

@ThatsAHandle

5 күн бұрын

You know who it was

@utopianna

5 күн бұрын

@@Durufle68 Thanks.

Why does he look like Peter Navarro 😂😂

@StevenTorrey

5 күн бұрын

I thought the same thing.

@JasonBoyce

5 күн бұрын

He sure does

@PacificForage

5 күн бұрын

Only he doesn't sound like a complete whack job, like Peter.

@meow2u22

5 күн бұрын

He's Peter Navarro's good twin.😅

@daviegriffin3539

5 күн бұрын

Peter's papa was a Rollin' Stone or Milkman? 😳

It would be nice if social media platforms could just be trusted to moderate themselves in a responsible manner Unfortunately, history has shown that they can not or are at least not willing to do so

@MichaelWinter-ss6lx

5 күн бұрын

Well, now they can be forced to watch their business. Civilized part of the world has already done this long ago. They had to, because we export really a lot of bs.

@janedoe3915

5 күн бұрын

That’s bc lies sell, the get clicks, they get engagement all which increase profits/shareholder profits and that’s the bottom line for a for-profit corporation.

Of course we want the mis-information removed!!!!!!!!

@jodyyoung2726

5 күн бұрын

Problem is they removed valid info from doctors. You should have watched the hearings...

Social Media must be 'Regulated' just like broadcast TV.

Couple of days ago my friend’s joke showing dinosaurs helping with the building of the pyramids was deleted as fake news lol😂

I remember crying learning that the suicide rate took off when social media really took off around 2010. It broke my heart to learn that that was happening to children. They should have never touched that stuff because those children, teenagers, and young adults are gone forever. Covid taught me how important Prevention is to any disease. We should’ve prevented the spread of the disease social media is and always has been. I agree it connects people all over the world and that should stay, but something has to be done about influencers. Influencers aren’t just influencing people, they’re ruining peoples lives by taking away their Hope for a better future. We need to teach people that being beautiful or rich isn’t everything there is to Life. Being Happy and fulfilled is everything, not being rich or beautiful.

By what moral standard and by what moral authority do social media companies sort comments by "relevance?"

The same people complaining about this complained about seat belt laws.

@charlesritter6640

5 күн бұрын

WRONG! I agree with seat belt laws.

@---Tre---

5 күн бұрын

@@charlesritter6640 Then why do you disagree with the government asking social media to put a seat belt on? Removing disinformation and misinformation helps remove risk and harm from our society.

@charlesritter6640

5 күн бұрын

@@---Tre--- I have no problem with the Government "asking". I have a problem when it's mandatory like during Covid.

@---Tre---

5 күн бұрын

@@charlesritter6640 The Supreme Court on Wednesday said the White House and federal agencies such as the FBI may continue to urge social media platforms to take down content the government views as misinformation, handing the Biden administration a technical if important election-year victory. Nothing about it being mandatory.

Who gets to define what is misinformation or not?

@TheWillvoss

5 күн бұрын

The literal scientific truth that is peer reviewed and ther eason we can do things like have medicine / go to space / engineer technology / have the combustion engine, etc. These things don't have 'both sides' theres blatant lies then truth. Really not that hard. Ask your grandparents how it worked. Was the earth flat a debate back then? hasn't been for thousands of years.

@charlesritter6640

5 күн бұрын

Guess

@user-zb9lv3gh8s

5 күн бұрын

​@@peterturner711exactly... They tell us what books we can read, when we can vote and when we can have children!

@reginarose9940

5 күн бұрын

Seriously? Misinformation is defined by Its relationship to facts. If a statement is provably false, it is misinformation. Despite Kelly Ann's definition, "alternative facts" are NOT a thing.

@MF-qf7bs

5 күн бұрын

Stupid question. The truth does.

The elected government asks private companies to be responsible with their profit-making services. Supreme Court says it's OK. So do I.

@frenchfry5675

5 күн бұрын

Make sure to look both ways before crossing the street.

@Col_Crunch

5 күн бұрын

emphasis on asks. People are acting like this decision gives the government the power to force companies to take specific action.

There is significant public interest in preventing misinformation campaigns. Misinformation poses irreparable harm to public health and trust. Social Media forums are the new defacto public forum wherein the government does have authority to regulate speech in a manner consistent with free speech principles and guardrails.

@MichaelWinter-ss6lx

5 күн бұрын

It may get somewhat difficult, if the flaw & odor party do manage to take hold more than now. I dont think there'll be a law made this year.

You go back and tell Emperor Palpatine- Darth Sidious there is no way the people are going to accept any more lies from anybody

Cigarettes have a giant warning label on every box.

Right under those Corinthian columns.

Finally!!! This is a good decision that will lead to good results for our country as a whole, regardless of what your political leanings are. The truth should always be of utmost importance!

Misinformation can cause a public harm's, direct or indirect people's got hurt by it. As for fitst amendment rights, cannot be use that's falsely misleading dangerously, that's why truths matters and disinformation belong to the corrupt people's.

Problem is who defines the misinformation. Previously social media makes their own decision. Now government makes the decision. Both are bad to me.

“We know what’s best for you” said the wolves to the sheep.

Social media companies need to show some respect to the office of the President of the US. The President asks you to remove a post then you should comply out of courtesy. The White House should not have to take you to court.

Yes ,we wouldn't want it used to direct people against us, or to call people to arms against us, or warn citizens of impending actions to be taken by us, whomever us should be !

we should make sure there are no corrupt politicians in government first

@MichaelWinter-ss6lx

5 күн бұрын

True, but usually its those who shout, which vote the bad ones into govt.

Is it okay to blackmail the public?

Too much governmental control !

Why don't the court care if people posting misinformation about other people? Of course if it is pointing the government!

Who is deciding the difference between misinformation and truth? That is the problem I have here. If we are free people with the capacity to think and discern, we should have all information. The past 4 years have proven that so much of what was censored and/or labeled as misinformation was actually truth. It is very concerning to me to allow government to influence free speech. Protecting children, I am 100% all in for removing things that pose a threat to children because of their vulnerable status. However, this must be balanced very carefully with the free speech rights that protect us from governmental control of information.

@Sam-sz6qq

5 күн бұрын

Well ...I like to keep it simple ..I listen to advice for things such as medical care, medications and such from my doctor or medical professionals....not somebody's uncle off of Facebook

@MichaelWinter-ss6lx

5 күн бұрын

There gonna set up an Information Agency, like in the "1984" book. Gonna be huge ;•) 90% of govt. gonna end up there. Ey, perhaps you can get a job!

@timetraveler_0

5 күн бұрын

​@@Sam-sz6qqProblem is, so called "professional" can be misinformed themselves or have hidden motives. Free speech should be just that, Free speech, with penalty for damage. We are not kids, we can make up our own mind.

@bt1169

5 күн бұрын

You will rarely hear the truth on Fox News. I would guess the percentage would be less than 5% of the time. The other 95% of the time they will say the EXACT OPPOSITE of what is true because they don't want to take the chance that their viewers may ever believe the truth.

@mattleathen445

5 күн бұрын

You’ve eaten up the misinformation and don’t have the mental capacity to realize it. Objective reality exists, even if Republicans hate it.

This could set a dangerous precedent in the future.. as much as this could be useful in tackling Russian and Chinese misinformation campaigns.

The only bigger joke than our current administration is the status of our supreme court.

@alexv1190

5 күн бұрын

Doubt you know anything about politics

@patrickmace5340

5 күн бұрын

@@alexv1190 clearly more than you do. But just how many administrations have you lived through? More than one?

The incoming Trump Administration should be able to put this to excellent use.

Now it the court would pass a law about our Representatives and politicians and all their misinformation

About time,these Lunatics on Social Media need to be Blocked, We are fed up with the Constant Conspiracy Theories.Facts are important, you can not just anyone spreading nonsense

@Stank18

5 күн бұрын

lol it’s true 99% of the time

@fauxque5057

5 күн бұрын

Well the covid conspiracy theories were all true. So the Supreme Court just upheld misinformation. The Russia Russia Russia conspiracy was also misinformation. Hunter's laptop being çalled Russian Disinformation was also a lie. Supreme Court dropped the ball on this one

@user-qn4zh2pw6m

5 күн бұрын

@@Stank18 Only a fool would think so.

@charlesritter6640

5 күн бұрын

Yeah, why in the world would we want all the information available so we can come to our own conclusions? We know we are not smart enough to figure it out for ourselves. Uncle Joe loves us and would never lie to us. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@bigdaddycros

5 күн бұрын

Like our liberal leaders?!

Alito, Thomas and G… as always. Money talks.

misinformation should be a crime but it is impossible to police on social media therefore it makes sense to regulate misinformation is dangerous to democracy, psychology and health

I get this, but where is the line? This is riddled with open doors for abuse. It’s the houses that will have to figure this out

Misinformation is just a way to silence the opposition.

@TheOleHermit

5 күн бұрын

No. Misinformation is the malicious opposition to truth.

@allste626

5 күн бұрын

Just like this platform already does.

@ross-carlson

5 күн бұрын

Uh, no - if the opposition is using "misinformation" then they are ACTIVELY LYING. So yes, that SHOULD BE SILENCED.

@VirtueCry

5 күн бұрын

Misinformation is a way to subvert democracy, and poses a threat to our country. Anyone pushing dangerous and false medical or election claims should be held criminally liable.

@TheOleHermit

5 күн бұрын

@@punctumarchimedes Who used the term, 'malicious'? I did. 'Malinformation' isn't even a proper term. In fact, Google tags it as being misspelled. You can't invent your own English words, because those proper terms already exist. 'Disinformation': "The key difference between misinformation and disinformation is that misinformation refers to false or inaccurate information that is unintentionally spread, while disinformation refers to false or misleading information that is intentionally spread with the purpose of deceiving or manipulating others." Get some education before trying to condescend upon TheOleHermit, Pal.

Galileo says hi

Start pulling them now google/YT. Or get your own Jack Smith. :)

The govt has every right to ASK for misinformation to be removed. The social media companies have every right to determine their own terms of service and remove posts. Companies are not obligated to post every commemt just like the centuries old practice of newspapers not publishing every editorial that gets submitted. That said, i believe social media should have some degree of accountability for the content on their platform.

There's a difference between asking (in pursuit of it's responsibility for the public good) and using executive power to pressure a desired outcome.

@my1vice

5 күн бұрын

lol... Don't be so naive.

@outermarker5801

5 күн бұрын

@@my1vice it's a wonder you're even on the internet with that amount of trite fear

@my1vice

5 күн бұрын

@@outermarker5801 You are right, the government has never lied to the American public.... My mistake.

Who decides it’s false ?

@enough1494

5 күн бұрын

lol, most factual stuff is easily verifiable. When it is not it is not! If it is a well kept secret, the truth ALWAYS COMES OUT! Fact check all you read! BTW, read Project 2025!

@user-ip5dm6jf8k

5 күн бұрын

The truth!

@DistortedReality-ow9dy

5 күн бұрын

What person decides it’s false who determines the truth ?

@MF-qf7bs

5 күн бұрын

Hopefully not someone with DistortedReality.

@alexv1190

5 күн бұрын

Me

At least the SCOTUS agrees that government also has free speech rights!

No rights are without limitation. Good ruling. Still a crooked a$$ court!

KZread & Google Reviews are my favourite.

The keyword here is ask. Not demand or require or shut down. Ask.

@my1vice

5 күн бұрын

That's step one.... Guess what step two is?

@peachygal4153

5 күн бұрын

and it was an ask not a demand

Now, all we have to do next is declare Fox Network as social media.

The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 is extended, yet again. The First Amendment has been castrated, the rest will follow.

Who released it???

So much for the first amendment.

@alexv1190

5 күн бұрын

Sorry russia no more disinfo

Let me take a wild guess at who gets decide what's misinformation and what's "accurate" information...

Remember when our forefathers used to grow regular corn and not republican monsanto gmo corn, and it was good.

@Iwqrxtwuvk23547

5 күн бұрын

What happened to that.

Can’t be done that totally goes ageist the freedom of speech, why now? What’s going on Boi

The White House should focus on protecting our borders, instead of our Social Media posts.

@alexv1190

5 күн бұрын

Tried but trump stopped it.

@alexv1190

5 күн бұрын

No more Russia disinfo

@ricksterbobolishious7523

5 күн бұрын

@alexv1190 right, in the 40th month of the Biden term. It's all Trumps fault.

@ricksterbobolishious7523

5 күн бұрын

@@alexv1190 like the Hunter laptop?

Anyone can ask, it's different to demand which would violate the first amendment, but social media platforms are private business and don't have to adhere to the constitution like the government has to.

@beyondpc9421

5 күн бұрын

"Private" companies are vassals and subservient to government thus they should be held to the same limitations. In fact the government itself is registered as corporation number 1 on Dunn & Bradstreet. If the government is a corporation and the constitution binds their conduct then why would a vassal of that same corporation be free from such bonds?

The idiocy I see too much of in these comments is that people actually believe the government wouldn’t lie to them and can actually be trusted to disseminate truth. What a joke. They only tell you what they WANT you to believe.

Mis information can be verified by the individual(s) doing the research (Government resources & Peer reviewed articles). What makes a person an expert ???

whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

Miss iss. Ive got records and were we wrong no nope and not.

The Supreme court is broken. Lol now you like it.

@alexv1190

5 күн бұрын

No more Russia bots

More control

@alexv1190

5 күн бұрын

Nope this is good. Sorry russia

What exactly does "reach out" mean?

@MF-qf7bs

5 күн бұрын

That's a really dumb question. Are you honestly confused by 'reach out'? Seriously? Because the rest of us all understand it to be 'sent a request'. Are you under the age of 10 that you do not know that?

@stevejoyner857

5 күн бұрын

@@MF-qf7bs just a friendly conversation?

The courts is 6 to 3

So who determines what is misinformation?

@charlesritter6640

5 күн бұрын

Take a guess

@marnie8007

5 күн бұрын

Who determined it before social media? I'm pretty sure it wasn't your crazy uncle gary so it probably won't be him this time, either.

@valderith

5 күн бұрын

the united states empire does

@MichaelWinter-ss6lx

5 күн бұрын

Oh, that is such a hard question. Who can possibly know an answer?

@MF-qf7bs

5 күн бұрын

Stupid question. The truth does.

So they can only spew lies

What a bs ruling

@alexv1190

5 күн бұрын

Sorry russia no more disinfo

@alexv1190

5 күн бұрын

Russia disinfo is

And who are the 3 dissenters?

@MF-qf7bs

5 күн бұрын

I'm guessing the 3 Trump supporters who want Trump and his supporters to be able to lie freely and unabated to the American public with no restraints. So we consider it 'campaigning'. Note: Totally hypothetical personal opinion.

I wish they would vote that fast with president immunity, it's been since Dec.2023, delay,delay,delay.

Now how will Marge Tater Green be able to see Hunter’s junk?

who decides it is "Misinformation" That is the problem with regulating free speach. One persons truth is another persons "Misinformation"

@user-ip5dm6jf8k

5 күн бұрын

BS, facts are facts. Opinions are not truth.

@MF-qf7bs

5 күн бұрын

That's exactly the problem with 'misinformation'. One's persons lies becomes another persons 'truth'. Russia and China use that to their advantage.

But we can have information about drinking battery acid for time travel is ok right?

@MichaelWinter-ss6lx

5 күн бұрын

Oh, you forgot your medication.

@seldnim46

5 күн бұрын

@@MichaelWinter-ss6lx this guy gets it

😅wait for the book