Supreme Court rules Trump is eligible to remain on ballot in historic14th Amendment case
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Former President Donald Trump in a historic case challenging his ability to seek the Republican presidential nomination under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment due to his actions around the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.
Read more: trib.al/JMzmzKR
---
Subscribe to ABC News on KZread: abcnews.visitlink.me/59aJ1G
Watch 24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events on ABC News Live: • LIVE: Latest News Head...
Watch full episodes of World News Tonight with David Muir here: • ABC World News Tonight...
Read ABC News reports online: abcnews.go.com
ABC News Digital is your daily source of breaking national and world news, exclusive interviews and 24/7 live streaming coverage. ABC News is the home to the #1 evening newscast “World News Tonight” with David Muir, “Good Morning America,” “20/20,” “Nightline,” “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos, “ABC News Live Prime” with Linsey Davis, plus the daily news podcast “Start Here.”
Connect with ABC News on social media:
Facebook: / abcnews
Instagram: / abcnews
TikTok: / abcnews
X: / abc
Threads: www.threads.net/@abcnews
LinkedIn: / abcnews
#trump #supremecourt #election2024 #news #abcnews
Пікірлер: 702
9-0 decision. So, all of those 'experts' like Tribe and Luttig are no longer 'experts' right?
@emsleywyatt3400
3 ай бұрын
They're still experts on the law, just not the politics of the court.
@dickjones8119
3 ай бұрын
thats right
@jameslewis8227
3 ай бұрын
No, it doesn’t mean that. It just means that the current Supreme Court doesn’t have faith in the U.S. judicial system, which is very SAD. DJT belongs in jail, not in the White House, but so far, too few people who have the duty to uphold the law and support the Constitution have had the courage or will to do so.
@AwkwardTruths
3 ай бұрын
@@emsleywyatt3400 But they're constantly wrong in their 'expert opinion'.
@AwkwardTruths
3 ай бұрын
@@jameslewis8227 Today's SCOTUS ruling was per curiam, 9-0. Tribe and Luttig could not have been more wrong.
Not surprised. Didn’t vote for Trump but didn’t agree with removing him from the ballot either. Justice was served today
@drewdrew7968
3 ай бұрын
Thank you. I feel the same
@Randy-jz9ox
3 ай бұрын
Yea it was wrong
@grazingrhyno5620
3 ай бұрын
Agree
@EasylikeSunday
3 ай бұрын
I’m right there with you
@Diggyace14
3 ай бұрын
You get another chance to get it right.
All the safe spaces will be overflowing…
@vintagemotorcyclerepair4052
3 ай бұрын
All the Empathy Tents are sure to be at full capacity in the Sanctuary Cities. Boo Hoo commies. You're going to need them for the next four years while Donald Trump is cleaning up the total CF left behind by BJ, ... I mean Obrandon.
Not surprised at all
@SkizzyMarsss
3 ай бұрын
Even the Biden appointed judges😂
@garrettwright7557
3 ай бұрын
@@SkizzyMarsss I don’t think people realize, it doesn’t matter who appoints these judges. Even if they are diehard Republicans, or Democrats, their entire job is to make sure the laws of the country, no matter which side is trying to pass, said law, is constitutional and is safe for American society. the decision is because they all knew what Colorado was doing, it was unconstitutional and was election interference.
@SkizzyMarsss
3 ай бұрын
@@garrettwright7557 correct
9-0😂😂😂
@larss4119
3 ай бұрын
Yeah, such a joke 😂 liberals are basically right wing compared to Europe.
@dickjones8119
3 ай бұрын
Nice ! 🙂
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
Rekt XD
@user-cf9lm1oi6i
3 ай бұрын
@jaytaylor2312 Evil decision.
@user-cf9lm1oi6i
3 ай бұрын
@dickjones8119 No, it's not.Evil😮
I don't live in the US, nevertheless I am able to hear the green, red and purple-colored-hair crowd screeching!
I'm not surprised. The people will decide
@dr.pendyke4887
3 ай бұрын
I hope so and if the people are allowed to decide, Biden will lose and the people will have spoken, but we all know that is not always the case.
@TruthOverFear21
3 ай бұрын
I have hope that the people will decide what best for us and not the politicians cause Congress had not passed anything productive or progressive since 2021
@M_dot202
3 ай бұрын
@@TruthOverFear21progressive = leftist... 💯 glad they haven't passed leftist legislation
Who'se surprised? Not me.
@thefreedommovement7043
3 ай бұрын
Spell much?
@maggiecox2293
3 ай бұрын
Me neither.
A victory for common sense and fair procedure.
Shocker, someone not ever charged with insurrection, let alone convicted, can't be disqualified for insurrection...
@andrewmeilinger6203
3 ай бұрын
As well as the fact that "officer" does not apply to POTUS
@kevinbaldwin7805
3 ай бұрын
It was more of a pillow fight that went wrong when compared to what the Black Lives Matter "protests" did.
@alexmichalas2000
3 ай бұрын
Trump never told anyone to protest! You’re so wrong, yet you will reap the benefits and rewards when Trump is elected president for the 2nd time on November 2024!!! 🎊🎉🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🕊️🎉🎊🎈❤️🇺🇸
@DylanLightfoot
3 ай бұрын
The office holders who were removed at the time the amendment was passed weren't convicted
@billbillerton6122
3 ай бұрын
@@wonmgProtesting isn't an insurrection.
Dang, I should have bought stock in tissue paper.
@The1stDukeDroklar
3 ай бұрын
😆
@mistyviolet3825
3 ай бұрын
LOL 😆 yes 🙌🏻 me too! Hahhaaaaaa
@NukkinFiggers1557
3 ай бұрын
👍
@jaytaylor2312
3 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@jimmylau8889
3 ай бұрын
Go ahead, don't delay, you are welcome to do it'.😅
good let the voters decide, as it's supposed to be
9-0 in favor of the American people.
@Youtubedeletes
3 ай бұрын
@@BassRck50why in the world would I vote blue? To continue the Destruction of our country? Open borders ,laken Riley inflation. Fentanyl. Ww3.dementia joe. Cocaine. 2 tier system of justice. You have given me no reason to vote blue You people never do.
@billbillerton6122
3 ай бұрын
@@BassRck50Nope.
YAY another win ❤
@conniebowman7203
3 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
Seems like a balanced position: Whether or not he's an insurrectionist, the states have no right to to make a ruling, it's up to congress. No one should really have any objections, that's a reasonable interpretation (and a useful precedent for when, for instance, Texas start trying to act in the Federal sphere on immigration)
@JohnB3363
Ай бұрын
Especially when the FBI ruled in 2021 that it wasn’t an insurrection and the house recently said the same thing. That and the fact not one single person arrested has been charged with it. Hard to convict someone of something he never did and was never charged with. But I’m sure you knew all that already
Correct decision 9-0
Thats even the most liberal of justices. Jackson etc..
@Mr.JoeBangles
3 ай бұрын
yup...even jumpin Jumanji Jackson voted against Colorado..lefties gonna throw her under the bus now too?
Many thanks to ABC for objectively reporting on this and not freaking out like CBS. Makes me want to return to watching MSM now 😊
@drewdrew7968
3 ай бұрын
lets not get carried away lol
@janetprice85
3 ай бұрын
Not me. The legacy media lost my trust when they peddled Hillary's lying dossier when it's aource and contents were suspect and basically supporting a coup attempt by a bogus impeachment by lying Schiff and Pelosi.
@marymurphy937
3 ай бұрын
I would never return to ABC. All they are doing is reporting an inevitable ruling.
@marymurphy937
3 ай бұрын
No surprise !! . If every state could remove candidates they didn't like from the ballot, there would be chaos. Also, there was no insurrection.
@user-hz5rk5vy1t
3 ай бұрын
Why? MSM is lying about everything else. Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, Micheal Shellenberger, Lee Fang, and Whitney Webb are the only real journalists left along with comedians that want to know what's going on.
That is so embarrassing for the Colorado supreme court
9-0 LOL
9-0. Time for Dems to quit acting like Putin.
@jeffhampton2767
3 ай бұрын
True ❤
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
That's (D)ifferent
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
@@wonmg maybe not...we can just fire a majority of the bureaucrats that aren't needed, like the FDA, EPA, DHS, DOE, NSA, FBI, CDC, CISA, FISA...
Just here for the tears. 😂
UNANIMOUS
@gamingxfiles
3 ай бұрын
Darn right
We just avoided Civil War. Everyone should be happy
@emrek99205
3 ай бұрын
Just get ready for the sequel Insurrection 2: A Second Try coming out in January.
@EuroMaidanWasAnInsurrection
3 ай бұрын
@emrek99205 I mean that would have happened for sure if Trump was blocked. Thankfully he wasnt.
@xavierdaume2757
3 ай бұрын
Who knows, I have thought about it too. Democrats in desperation are trying to open all Pandora´s boxes and that is a extremely dangerous game.
@EuroMaidanWasAnInsurrection
3 ай бұрын
@@xavierdaume2757 EuroMaidan was going to be a blueprint
@joeblog2672
3 ай бұрын
Sure. Let's all cower in fear of upholding democracy, because well, democracy is too dangerous. (Oh no, can someone track me typing this?). There should be federal rules in regards to a federal document's justifiable relevance to a federal election!! Come on people! You did it by making counterfeiting a federal crime. If the SC wants congress to decide on the exclusionary merits of 14/3 as it pertains to Trump's ability to regain office (or any other governmental office) then congress should be able to resolve the issue before millions of voters are knowingly potentially disenfranchised even if hell freezes over and Trump were to actually win! Absolute insanity that needs to be addressed for future insurrectionist candidates! Everyone should be happy??? You have been watching too much of that apathetic loser Bill Maher!
The Lord is your strength president, Trump
Yes!!!!
@ToshisanMotonaka
3 ай бұрын
whats your only fans?
@user-rs6kf6fx2l
3 ай бұрын
@@ToshisanMotonakau mad tds??
They tried every trick in the Communist handbook to eliminate their political opponent, and it has failed miserably.. LOL ! Ya gotta love it !
@kirkw.72
3 ай бұрын
They can still JFK him.
@EKAdventures51
3 ай бұрын
America turning into a Facists nation
@michaelb.3982
3 ай бұрын
@@BassRck50 Yes, the Dems follow it ! Look at what they are doing to Trump.. Our Public schools..Our colleges..our media etc etc..
@Dpinks7522
3 ай бұрын
@@BassRck50 Should have said playbook.
Thanks you US Supreme Judges dismissed Colorado Ballot case favor President Trump 🙏🙏🙏
@MadPrinceSheo
3 ай бұрын
Trump is a communist and so is the Supreme Court now.
@janetprice85
3 ай бұрын
And that means Illinois's and Maine's is toast too.
Liberals going down LOL! Great job SCOTUS.
Great, thank you supreme court justices.
Beautiful..... He should sue all the states who tried to take away his rights .
@grazingrhyno5620
3 ай бұрын
You can't, a right needs to be established before a lawsuit. This is the first time this amendment has been challenged. So today the supreme court established what states can't make that decision. So from this point on, if they don't again then you can file a lawsuit.
@grazingrhyno5620
3 ай бұрын
@@robertgouin1812 I doubt that
pound sand Colorado!!
AFT someone made the right decision. The more you fight the people's right to choose, the more power you give him. Seems obvious!
*This guy must not win. IIIegal immigrants and crime must prevail above all else.*
@The1stDukeDroklar
3 ай бұрын
I'm sensing a wee bit of sarcasm there 😜
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
Every gets an illegal alien!
Cnn and univision save us the red tape😂😂😂 "no matter how rich, no matter how powerful" you too save us the red tape ny attorney general 😂😂😂
Will this ruling apply to Illinois as well, anybody know ?
As a Canadian watching this decision, Canadians and the all free nations of the world have always looked up to the USA as a leader in democracy. The whole world is watching and taking notice of the our democratic hero’s. Thank you Americans from all of us around the world.❤
Lol,these judges tried to band trump.
SCOTUS should be able to kick candidates off the ballot. They are supposed to be impartial. Congress is not.
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
Read article 3.
🎊🎉🎈 HIPP HIPP HURRA- HIPP HIPP HURRA- HIPP HIPP HURRA 🎉✨🎈 Sweden STAND BY Donald J. Trump ✊ Trump SAVE THE WORLD 2024 👊
Hahaha, let's make America great again!!!
Chew on that colorado but ya don't deserve as gooder president as Trump anyway!!
What the Lord can't do?
Thank you! God bless u!
Love him or hate him, Trump all the way to the white house.
This election is going to be a "HUUUUUGGGGGEEEEE" mess.
JESUS LOVES TRUMP.
Impersonating a democrat today.. Waaaaaaaaaaa. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaaaaa Waaaaaaaaaaaaa, mommy you need Kleenex to dry my crybaby tears. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
The case of Victor L. Berger, of Wisconsin, in the Sixty-sixth Congress.
Only Congress can enforce the 14th amendment section 3 now.
@SuenosDeLaNoche
3 ай бұрын
Only voters can overrule the absurd decision by the supreme(ly corrupt) court. Vote BLUE, your life depends upon it.🔵🔵🔵
@gamingxfiles
3 ай бұрын
They already did. It’s called an impeachment trial. Which he was acquitted from.
@gamingxfiles
3 ай бұрын
@@SuenosDeLaNoche also cope hard
@roberts7873
3 ай бұрын
@@SuenosDeLaNoche all 9 justices.
@SuenosDeLaNoche
3 ай бұрын
@@gamingxfiles Voting BLUE 🔵
*To the Democrats of Colorado - this is a smack down! You talk about preserving democracy but were sooooo willing to deprive millions of exercising their franchise - the people's right to vote for the candidate of their choice!*
@blakekaveny
3 ай бұрын
No Colorado democrats were involved with the case. The case was brought by Norma Anderson who’s a republican
Right. This is what I've said from the beginning. While it might be *_nice_* to have him off the ballot, the text of the constitution doesn't expressly give states that ability. Instead, it will be up to Congress as representatives of the people and the states on Jan 6, 2025 to determine if ballots for an Insurrectionist are to be counted. Ballots are already to be validated on that day. It is just one criteria that has never needed to be considered before.
@manateemilk1
3 ай бұрын
What if…while trying to invalidate those ballots the republicans have a bunch of Feds break into congressional building?
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
But, isn't that overturning democracy? Alternate slate of electors are treason according to the Georgia case. Uh oh...looks like your lawfare is coming home to roost. XD
For Dummies [section 3]-correct interpretation is to replace the word 'disqualified' (not used in section 3) with 'disabled' i.e. NOT ABLE TO. Therefore, any person(s) 'DISABLED' under S3 may, by Congress, have said 'DISABILITY' REMOVED/overridden/reinstating QUALIFICATION.
They said the text of the law was clear.
Good.
Did anyone have any doubts about how this was going to turn out. Even crying democrats should of known the Supreme Court would rule unanimously
Dump that Colorado judge
242 days to go. 🎯
What kind of fool are they?🤨
What an intriguing development in the political and legal landscape! The Supreme Court's decisions often have far-reaching implications, and this ruling is no exception. It underscores the complexity of constitutional law and its impact on democracy. Regardless of where one's opinions may lie, it's a moment to reflect on the importance of engaging with civic processes and understanding the legal frameworks that guide them. Here's to hoping for continued discourse that strengthens the fabric of democracy and encourages informed participation in all aspects of governance.
@Dpinks7522
3 ай бұрын
Representative Republic, not Democracy. We aren't mob rule.
Section 3, 14th Amendment “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
Extremely interesting and informative.
This ruling doesn't really matter because Scotus will then rule that a President is not immune from prosecution, and that is even bigger because a convicted candidate cannot win the election.🤣
So can you all stop the whole insurrection narrative please 🙏
@mrlool1991
3 ай бұрын
The supreme court did not clear him from being an insurrectionist . Read the ruling
@blakekaveny
3 ай бұрын
No because the scotus didn’t mention insurrection in the opinion. So he hasn’t been cleared of that.
😊 Told you! We the American people will vote for who we please. No meddling billionares. No Democrat lawfare. No illegal paper ballots.
@michaelb.3982
3 ай бұрын
Well said ! Trump wins again lol !
Of course the Supreme would. His primarily selected judges. All 9 though? Ok Wowzer.
@LadieKadie
3 ай бұрын
ALL 9, and I guarantee you miss don’t know what a woman is WAS NO SELECTION. Quit being Marxist commies already! America is naturally against that ideology! We were built on ideas directly opposed to Marxism and communism, yet it keeps trying to sneak back in through the socialists.
@drewdrew7968
3 ай бұрын
Yeah, that's every liberal judge included. Jackson / Brown etc. It was the right decision, let this election play out the right way.
@billgates3388
3 ай бұрын
well, no, it isn't because of the judges he nominated. It's because the states don't have the right under the constitution to do what colorado was trying to do. Beyond that, Trump didn't even do what Colorado was saying he did as their justification for trying to remove him from the ballot. That's why even the liberal "justices" (begrudgingly im sure) had to side with the majority.
@mb1969mb
3 ай бұрын
@@billgates3388 🤦🏽♀️🙆🏽♀️
@billgates3388
3 ай бұрын
@@mb1969mb imagine If you gave a speech and told me to walk and make my voice heard peacefully. and then i walk and protest, and then an undercover FBI agent breaks a window and a police officer opens a door and waves me into a building. and then you release a video telling me to go home, but then I get arrested for breaking and entering and the entire media says that you told me to do that. then, you never get charged with it. and 3 years go by. suddenly states start trying to take you off the ballot because remember how you orchestrated that break-in?
GOP: States get to decide! Also GOP: You do what we tell you!
@mrcocky318
3 ай бұрын
Kicking a presidential candidate off the ballot when hasn’t been convicted of anything, and having states decide their own abortion laws are two completely different things. I hope and pray too god that you’re smart enough to see that.
@The1stDukeDroklar
3 ай бұрын
@@mrcocky318 Umm, they're a liberal so your prayers are in vain.
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
Not in constitution In constitution Not surprised you don't know the difference
@rjh6111
3 ай бұрын
@The1stDukeDroklar I'm an independent, who voted for Trump in 2016, but then again you'd need more than 2 brain cells to consider that as an option
@rjh6111
3 ай бұрын
@uniquebreakfasttaco the constitution specifically states that insurrectionists cannot hold office, multiple courts have certified that Jan 6th was an insurrection, so allowing someone from running for office when they are barred from that office not only makes zero sense, it's moronic, and blatantly stupid
Big "L" for the lefty cultist
@ALittleHelpFromMyLens
3 ай бұрын
Doesn't matter. He's going to lose anyway!
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
@@ALittleHelpFromMyLensonly chance is criminal aliens voting... and that's illegal, so....
Hahahahahahahaha Trump he's like a timex watch he takes a lickin and keeps on ticking
I'm not surprised 👿
@grazingrhyno5620
3 ай бұрын
You used the wrong emoji.... This is the one you wanted😊
Nevada kept Donald J Trump off their preliminary ballot. I didn’t get to vote because I didn’t want my vote to go to any of the candidates on the 2024 NV preliminary ballot.
No one is above the law and no one is exempt from those same protections,trump the citizen has those protections
Ted Cruz called this 9-0 decision months ago
So then who decides if a candidate violated the insurrection clause? Can they explain?
@bobcob3362
3 ай бұрын
Congress. And they aquited him. Case closed.
@sunnyla2835
3 ай бұрын
He would need to be charged with insurrection FIRST! Then be convicted! He hasn’t even been charged
@drewdrew7968
3 ай бұрын
I'm guessing they would need to be convicted of insurrection..
@user-nq8xo5ng9b
3 ай бұрын
usually if they get found guilty in a court of law
@Marleylucyandme
3 ай бұрын
A judge disqualified Couy Griffin from holding office in New Mexico due to insurrection. So where is the accountability for Trump? I would never accept any president from repeating his actions. Despicable.
Trump: 1 Banana Republic: 0
@emrek99205
3 ай бұрын
Might want to look up what a Banana Republic is.
@M_dot202
3 ай бұрын
@@emrek99205Banana Republic: The Fundamental Transformation of America...
No indictment…no ban…too easy. Another waste of tax payers money and time.
The sad part of this, We the people are seeing what corrupt judges we have in our system . But then maybe that is a good thing and eventually they will be gotten rid of. Lets hope McAfee removes fani
Gracias a DIOS!! Finally, Some justice for our President Trump.
Gee nice to have a stacked deck on the court
Unanimously! So if you thought he should be disqualified, you are the Extreme.
Yaaaaa for freedom. Let freedom ring, Let freedom ring. Not a big fan of Trump but when the states makes decisions that are Federal then the Constitution is at stake. A big fear of Hamilton who did not think that the Constitution would stand if states tried to undermine it.
America absolutely loves president Trump❤
@LadieKadie
3 ай бұрын
Yea because we’re repulsed by communism and Marxism. As it should be.
@blackOneTime
3 ай бұрын
delusional
@LadieKadie
3 ай бұрын
@jameswheeler349Fine. Vote for the turnip that’s being operated by the WEF. The rest of us will fight.
@Marleylucyandme
3 ай бұрын
I do not. Will never.
@rachelsill79
3 ай бұрын
You made them cry😂😂
" The government of the people by the people and for the people shall not perish from the earth.." A. Lincoln. Trump 2024❤❤🇺🇲🇺🇲 USA USA USA USA USA USA
@jameslewis8227
3 ай бұрын
If you were to actually read a history book or two, you would be aware that a person like Abraham Lincoln would never vote for an abhorrent person like DJT. President Lincoln did everything he could to unite this country, while DJT is doing everything to rip it apart to the advantage of our adversaries.
love how Posts that are not against community guidelines but not supportive of the narrative are removed. You do know when you do that you lose the trust of people that interact with the site?
I think that we need to separate the foundational question of whether the January 6th events constitute an insurrection from the subsequent considerations regarding individual involvement or support, including former President Trump's actions. Determining the nature of the events independently is crucial for applying legal and constitutional provisions accurately and fairly. Here’s a breakdown: ### Do the Violent Acts on January 6th Constitute Insurrection? - **Definition of Insurrection**: Insurrection typically refers to a violent uprising against governmental authority with the intent to overthrow or disrupt its constitutional or legal order. - **Characteristics of January 6th**: The events involved a violent breach of the U.S. Capitol with the intent to obstruct the certification process of the Electoral College votes, a constitutional procedure essential to the peaceful transition of power. - **Comparison to Legal Standards**: The actions on January 6th, characterized by their aim, scale, and violence, align with the broad definitions of insurrection, as they sought to disrupt the constitutional operation of the government forcibly. Given these considerations, many legal scholars and commentators argue that the January 6th events do meet the criteria for being considered an insurrection, focusing on the intent and actions of the participants rather than the outcomes. ### Trump’s Eligibility and Involvement - **Eligibility Considerations**: If the January 6th events are determined to be an insurrection, the next step is to assess any individual's involvement in those events or their support for the participants, including offering pardons, which could be seen as "aid or comfort." - **Objective Assessment**: Determining involvement or support should ideally be based on factual evidence, such as actions taken, statements made, and any direct connections to the events or participants. This includes evaluating whether any offers of pardons were made to individuals involved in the insurrection. - **Legal and Constitutional Process**: Any conclusions about eligibility, particularly under the 14th Amendment, would likely require a formal legal process or congressional action, given the amendment’s provisions for enforcing disqualification from office. ### Non-partisan Application - **Fact-based Decisions**: By focusing first on the nature of the January 6th events and then on individual actions in relation to those events, the assessment strives to be rooted in objective, non-partisan facts. This approach aims to uphold constitutional and legal standards above political considerations. - **Challenges**: Despite the intent to base decisions on non-partisan facts, the deeply politicized environment can impact the interpretation of facts and the application of legal standards. This underscores the importance of rigorous, transparent, and fair processes in making such determinations. In summary, determining whether the January 6th events constitute an insurrection based on legal definitions sets the foundation for any subsequent considerations regarding individual involvement or support. This methodical approach allows for a structured assessment of eligibility under the 14th Amendment or related legal questions, emphasizing the need for a fact-based, non-partisan framework.
If you listen Closely, you can actually hear democrats crying. 😂
Since He Owns the Supreme Court Who would ever thought differently?? Hmmm DUH !!
Let's go to Mexico before the border closes
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
Y'all keep saying this, yet you never leave. I wonder why...
This is a real problem for Colorado Supervisor of elections. Hahahahahahaha
They knew it was BS but tried anyway.
The constitution is our law and everyone overlooks that for an orange buffoon!!!
It would be nice to see some f-ing justice ⚖️
I am so glad I have dual citizenship b/c the States are about to go through some things after this next election…just like Iran did.
Shocking.
❤
😂😂😂😂All you Trump haters Go Get a life and stop wasting taxpayers money
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
They're socialists...the only thing they know how to do is waste taxpayer money.
To understand the US Supreme Court's decision one needs to read the US Constitution first. The US is not a Democratic Republic, but a Republic with some elements of Democracy. Originalism means that the only rights and policies that are protected are ones that are explicitly laid out in the constitution, conforming with the “original”intentions of the founders. Although slavery has been abolished, the property that is central to the Constitution-private property, the right to exploit the majority for the benefit of the tiny minority remains. “Those who do not move, do not notice their chains.” ― Rosa Luxemburg Recall Citizens United. Update US Constitution to shift power balance between Majority and Minority.
@UniqueBreakfastTaco
3 ай бұрын
Yup
It's amazing what paying someone off can get you
All the Trump haters are real quiet......😂
Just respect the decision of the court. Democracy