The attorney for the gov is brilliant

@tanyabailey7651

2 ай бұрын

Exactly what I thought.

@Pants3

2 ай бұрын

She is great!

Ah yes the party that claims to want to limit government overreach wants to tell people how to live their lives

The Solicitor General (government’s lawyer) was absolutely brilliant. She’s incredibly intelligent and extremely effective.

Why does the Supreme Court keep taking cases where there are no damages? How does it make sense legislating based on hypothetical plaintiffs?

@jeffbanken689

2 ай бұрын

No damages? Hypothetical plaintiffs, definitely a candidate for dumbest comment in social media history.

@jamestaylor1088

2 ай бұрын

@@jeffbanken689 concrete and particularized injury, where?

@ageb9811

2 ай бұрын

@@jeffbanken689 Go ahead, explain it. What were the damages? Please explain how the plaintiffs were wronged in such a way that they are entitled to a legal remedy which strips everybody else’s right to take mifepristone. Let’s hear it genius

I have not heard of anyone complaining about the birth control pill. What is the problem?

@tammythomas8167

2 ай бұрын

Birth control causes weight gain, hair loss, depression, suicidal ideation and many more health issues for women

@Gfy69ytb

2 ай бұрын

See my response about DNCs on the comments page. I could have DIED.

@thankfuljosh

Ай бұрын

It kills unborn humans.

I want to see if SCOTUS doesn’t want the FDA to decide which drugs should be dispensed. If the FDA can’t allow drugs to be dispensed, the Supreme Court shouldn’t make laws.

Elizabeth Prelogar is just, absolutely, awesome. Complete command of the case. Complete command of the relevant law. Never speaks in anything but complete sentences strung together as complete paragraph and thoughts. Never a pause or nonsense word. Impressive in every respect.

@kimscott8176

2 ай бұрын

This must be pure sarcasm.

Thank you for recording and posting!

Wow Jackson saved for last. Her questioned:/ agreeableness with the government I think shows her view on the outcome of this case.

Thomas and Alito are owned by fascists

The Supreme Court knows law the FDA knows food and drugs. Stay in your lane, Supreme Court.

Weird how Senator Hawley’s wife is arguing a case in front of the Supreme Court that normally would never have standing.

jesus DOES IT MATTER THE SPECIFIC PERSON ISNT ALLOWED TO SUE?

@user-ue1lv3mr5h

2 ай бұрын

What person?

More than just Abortion: States Rights: healthcare rules on “involuntary and or Right(s) of Consent” treatments on out of state/country patients. Ie Vacationers? Travelers? Or Patients “transferred From one state/nation to another by another state/nation??!!

@1969billy1970

2 ай бұрын

Ie Private Hospital/Provider That Transfers a Patient for philosophical and or moral reasons because they conflict with state/nations rights.(Where does the patient’s rights stand in that situation).

@1969billy1970

2 ай бұрын

Medical Malpractice: What Constitutes It??? Damages Physical, Psychological, and or Both?!!

@1969billy1970

2 ай бұрын

IE : Both Psychological And Physical Damages!! “You Performed an Abortion” vs “You didn’t perform and abortion” Out of State Rights!!

This is so freaking surreal. The drug is designed to cause an adverse event and the core argument is that studies show no adverse events. If that was true the drug would not be working.😂😂😂

@huffhouse2

2 ай бұрын

“An adverse event is any undesirable experience associated with the use of a medical product in a patient.” The drug does what people want it to do. It works. The abortion is not an adverse event; it means the drug works safely the way it is supposed to.

@pcon77

2 ай бұрын

@@huffhouse2 Hahaha. I am pretty sure the fetus is experiencing a pretty "adverse" freaking event. Also abortion is so much of an adverse event that the classic Hippocratic Oath includes the following promise, "I will give no sort of medicine to any pregnant woman, with a view to destroy the child."

@pcon77

2 ай бұрын

@@huffhouse2 Sorry but the fetus is experiencing a pretty "adverse event". The event is so adverse, that the original Hippocratic Oath (5th century BC to 1964AD) had doctors make the following promise "I will give no sort of medicine to any pregnant woman, with a view to destroy the child."

God gave all women life.

#fightthepatriarchy #abortthecourt

Who is the real rapist here? the attacker that raped the woman or the Supreme Court that wants to rip her rights off?

If gynocologists cant do the job they took an oath to do, they should practice other medicine.

@CraftAddictedWendy

2 ай бұрын

Especially perplexing since members of the plaintiff organization include dentists. How many women run to their dentist for help when they learn that they’re pregnant? 🤷‍♀️

Satan. Out smarting women. Have answers to God.

The USA and this dumb abortion issue. I am male- had a vasectomy 30 years ago. So I am old. I am not from USA. I am of the opinion that all American males should have a vasectomy. That would solve this issue once and for all- and I wouldn’t have to listen to the mindless rants from all sides. Also the prophecy of the movie - Idiocracy could be reversed as currently it is spot on.

What stupid, bigoted questions by some judges.

It doesn’t matter how the crime is committed.

@markpkessinger

2 ай бұрын

What "crime?"

@AmberTurdsShittyBedsheet

2 ай бұрын

Calm down, Sparky, a woman taking a morning after pill isn't anywhere near an abortion, lol. If you backwoods folks spent less time chopping wood and whittling sticks and more time reading books and listening to experts maybe you'd have known that before the age of 45.