Listening to smart people like Jordan is like a symphony. Every word and phrase has an harmony and sense. Beautiful.

@sergeydzema5569

4 жыл бұрын

Kudos for the Video clip! Apologies for butting in, I am interested in your opinion. Have you heard the talk about - Biyiam Biyameron Solution (just google it)? It is a smashing exclusive guide for learning how to easily get the success of your life of your dreams without the hard work. Ive heard some incredible things about it and my friend finally got great success with it.

@deepakchandwani3403

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah it's like no word is unnecessary Every word used has a purpose I have to Google some words but it's fine😄

@bigog4444

3 жыл бұрын

I’m genuinely Trynna figure out how do he talk like that. Speech class? I wanna know

@resiliencetips8900

3 жыл бұрын

@@bigog4444 it’s mainly experience. Public Speaking it’s about exercising a lot and learn with the best. Cheers

@Prasen1729

2 жыл бұрын

Listening to pseudo-intellect you mean ? LOL. Thanks to people like you, people like Joran appear to be smart.

Finding myself perplexed, I am receiving Jordan's lecture, for free. I'm assuming these people in the room paid for the class at a premium (college tuition). Strange world. I will be applying these principals to my work.

Everyone watching this: “Omg, that’s literally me!”

Could you imagine what a treat for your mind would’ve been attending these lectures during that time at University of Toronto. Did these students know he was a wisdom celebrity in the making......

@jimmorehead9188

2 жыл бұрын

Actually I can imagine it ! I had a prof in college who was an archeologist, museum curator and taught theology and philosophy. It was many decades ago, and he spoke with a heavy middle eastern dialect, but was brilliant at doing what JP does in tying together anthropology, philosophy, religion and human nature. His lectures were not as encompassing as JP but really profound & interesting. Love JP’s lectures!

New video title: Jordan Peterson teaches some killer Monopoly strategies.

@writer104

2 жыл бұрын

Taking a loan out early in a game of monopoly, paid back slowly at a high interest rate, is one of the best strategies. The extra property advantage will repay the money lost to interest several times over the course of the game. And this is a double advantage because the lender is playing the game with less money to buy properties.

Thanks for not showing graphs camera guy.

@nightRanger0077

3 жыл бұрын

You don't need to see a graph, he explained it with hand gestures and math terms. He said one graph was linear and the other was exponential.

@ptkk21

3 жыл бұрын

@@nightRanger0077 Thank you changing my needs for me. That really helped.

@obsidianwolf-yt

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao

this video should have more views. Valuable information for life lessons and business.

@cristianaldana1912

4 жыл бұрын

cos this video is in the 80%

Everyone in the world should watch this.

This is amazing information. Thank you for sharing!

I'm a bum , and I'm very successful at it ! I love the beach and the beach loves me ! A quote from Napoleon.👍

So you're saying that a productive group should ideally consist of 4 people.

@orion9k

5 жыл бұрын

It all depends what you need to produce and what personality types people consist of within the group....

@alecfleming373

5 жыл бұрын

I found this a remarkably intelligent answer. Musically speaking, most groups are 3-4 members at the most typically at 7 max. But you find the longest lasting groups are of 4 members.

@cheekymonkeyali

5 жыл бұрын

Yes. The book The Mythical Man Month goes into this. Something like a surgical team approach is best

@orion9k

5 жыл бұрын

Again, it depends what type of personalities the people have - if you put 4 people together all with a dominant personality, the group will have huge conflicts and be dysfunctional. Group of 2 people can be better than group of 4 and group of 6 can also be better than group of 2 or 4. As I said, it depends on what they need to work on and how the personalities fits the role in the group.

@alexdoe5121

4 жыл бұрын

1 is even better for efficiency

Now, I finally understand Multilevel marketing.

Once one begins to win, one's ability to win increases exponentially.

Yes, this is called the 20/80 rule. Focus on the 20% which produces 80% of the results.

@thomasseillers3905

4 жыл бұрын

thats a different one, i guess. But it goes in the same direction

@adamconner9302

3 жыл бұрын

That's the Paretto Principle, similar but not the same

@TheMarmite09

3 жыл бұрын

@@adamconner9302 The name maybe not, but that is the concept which JP is talking about :)

@raakuu

3 жыл бұрын

Like prioritising your todo list to two or three things per day, tasks most important in a day.

@MrNeuroMind

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheMarmite09 he is talking about Price's law, not about Pareto principle ...

Creatives seem to be constantly shoved into the 'do what you're told' category... making for a sad time. Good thing they're creative...

@jimmorehead9188

2 жыл бұрын

That’s b/c people in supervisory roles in most organizations are scared to death rock the corporate boat due to legal and HR liabilities. Less so in closely held companies but I assure you any publicly traded company has so many rules and regulations and reporting requirements they lose sight of making their widgets in favor of HR, political and legal considerations. Obviously not the place for creative minds which is why the life span of most businesses is relatively short, they are simply unable to adapt to new ideas technologies and implement creative ideas. Been there, done that…

That was so frustrating when that student asked the question, I really wanted to know what Peterson wanted to go with that point.

@writer104

2 жыл бұрын

The discussion about churning who is in the top 10-1% naturally fits with the topic of the productivity of companies. It's relevant to say that some companies do not survive. It is almost the same idea as saying some of the wealthiest people do not maintain their positions.

It's a race to the top - whatever that means. At the same time the bottom shadows us all.

I find this fascinating, in the Bible Jesus says, those who have, more will be given to them and those who does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. At fist this sound terrible, but its about the parable of talents given to the servant, and its really about who is willing to work and do what they can with what they have, and if you are afraid of having too little and try to preserve it, you will eventually loose it. Its not about what you possess but your attitude towards what you possess. Even it you switch it up or take it away, it will make not difference.

@travelsouthafrica5048

2 жыл бұрын

@Alex Ravenclaw has very little to do with what you think , Jesus was talking about spiritual gifts , about wealth He said this Matthew 6:33 “But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.” I can testify to this being true , seek God the rest He will provide for you are you familiar with " CS Lewis doodle "?

Very, very interesting

The Ego + Fanatics = The Machine

I'm from Cambodia, I'm thank teacher

This is why SOCIALISM & COMMUNISM can never work.....

@happysnappyd7640

2 жыл бұрын

The subject is much more complicated than that.

@rockstar-kp2jy

2 жыл бұрын

@@happysnappyd7640 its a basic premise tho

@TruthSayer2007

2 жыл бұрын

1,000% correct

@TheForeverAddicted

2 жыл бұрын

Finland's Prime Minister has never had a real job... We are so fucked in the West.

@ayumalani5631

2 жыл бұрын

They can work for short times. Like JP said, 20% that does the most work shpuld be honored and rewarded while others must be motivated to do so by following them. Incompetent ones can go to GULAG. But on the downside, this is a house of cards that is bound to fall. Socialism only works temporarily. While for Communism, workers can own factories but they have no say in what a science lab does. However the Marxist ideal opposes segregating professions so you have a farmer interfering with a brain surgeon.

6:51 - Story of my life, and the way schools operate.

@EpithetMusicTV

5 жыл бұрын

i know the feeling

@oliverbeedham

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao “I’m not retarded I’m just čréätïvé and you can’t handle me” 😂😂

Once sucess is established, it is difficult to sustain.

What is going on with that mirror reverse camera? Why the image is vertically flipped? That's not how normal camera operates.

Listening to JP has helped increase my efficiency and drive.

You should made Video so much for successful of successful people.

In uni, I used to do all the group work for my group. At least 80% of it. That's how the group functioned. Because distribution, role assignment, and task management took way more time to do than to just do the work. There was also a great risk of conflict. But does it mean that my group mates didn't work? Not exactly. The purpose of a group is to achieve a goal and they made sure the group goal achieved regardless of each individual contribution toward the actual goal. Regardless of me working alone group goal was achieved so they DID their work in the macro sense of view.

this is called zipf's law and there is no real explanation. It also happens with words in a language.

@GrapeVines

2 жыл бұрын

it’s actually price’s law. zipf’s law is more about frequency and linear inverse proportion. it’s very similar but zipf’s law leaves out the exponential amount of work done.

You have to become a monster to have peace

Dunks!!

The banks in Europe charging for keeping your money is completely insane.

To be fair, one music drama by Wagner lasts as long as roughly fifteen Mozart piano sonatas.

@lailaiwdable

5 жыл бұрын

Luke Faulkner very good point

@dgdg6143

3 жыл бұрын

And has a 0.0000001% of the creativity and imagination also

Could that explain why small countries do better than bigger countries? 🤔

@tanarot5465

2 жыл бұрын

Big country or more population are such a number not quality btw

Do you have the link to the original video?

Price's law and Pareto distribution

That's me :)

They say people don't like smart people. Ok. Take everything that smart people have created of the people.I I respect these people what I don't respect is they have taken their gift and used it as a weapon to make themselves rich. Evil When you should have shared it for free.

@svenshalko617

2 жыл бұрын

Why, in your opinion, should they share it for free? Would you personally do that if you were to be in a powerful position like that?

there is a weird digital effect to the audio that makes my head hurt maybe its just me but this one sounds weird.

Ahh I another reason I should 😃

Question: What is success?

Missed the ppts :(

It used to be 80/20. 20% did 80% work and 80% did 20% work. You have 100 employees, 80 of them are slacking off.

how come he is so smart.....

@aceofspades02

4 жыл бұрын

because he is not in the base of the pyramid.

If by smart you mean creative.

Do you agree with Jordan Peterson?

@TheEternalOuroboros

5 жыл бұрын

@TVSuchty A fact is just an opinion with humanistic evidence applied to it to thereby label it more valid aka 'Factual'. Just thought i'd leave this here, think about it.

@TheEternalOuroboros

5 жыл бұрын

@TVSuchty Everything is relative, so how can something relative be true?

@anti.hermma1710

5 жыл бұрын

@@TheEternalOuroboros Although I agree on your statement, I must call upon the ''Math'' argument. No matter how subjecive your thought process is and you sum up with other subjective people to come up to a same conclusion, 1+1 will always be 2. We are here to measure this and apply it to other stuff we need to figure or sort out in the same algorithm we agree to call ''logic''.

@Mike-sv2nu

5 жыл бұрын

Absolutely, whether it is a company, city or a ship, the bigger they are the more hiding places there are for the incompetent.

At larger companies - 10% of people do 50% of the work - as company grows Competence grows linearly, incompetence grows exponencially.....

@ambitiousbeauty1013

8 ай бұрын

That makes sense. The bigger the company grows, the more room for errors.

@caleuxx9108

8 ай бұрын

Where I work now.... the fault (I believe) is mainy with middle managment and the failure of communication between the competent hardworkers and the middle managment that refuses to listen to them..... They are arrogant and chauvanistic..... They bring on a new imcompetent non-consicientious person and even though people know he is bad, middle manament keeps him there.... some of it due to the fact that company refuses to give better pay to the less qualified people (upper managment decision?) ..... so only really incompetent people start and stay (elsewhere they have been fired)....

I don't think peterson would agree wanted with what's in the image of the video.

Where is the girl from the clickbait?

We will never be able to solve this issue because it is human nature and it is built into us

Society is monopoly a billion times

He just gave us the answer. If you're among these ass holes who expect a free ride, slave a bit longer cuz no money = nothing, take those saving and keep moving jobs till you find one that sees your value or till you have enough savings to work for yourself. I am a victim of the freeloaders. Always happens, "your management materials" or "we love your work, look for that promotion" which we all know are lies to hold you down in a spot, because you are too good at it. Then if you cut back you're just like everyone else and some poor fucker blind to it (like myself) ends up doing it all... Never been ok to me. So you got it, again within 3 months I am looking to move jobs... Mind you I held a job for 3 and a half years where my co workers were sabotaging my work... Interestingly, Jordan says without saying it, the successful pick their battles.

assuming that its correct (sqr of employees does the half of the work) ideal no of employees would be 4 :)

@johnwalczak9202

2 жыл бұрын

nope, 1. square root of one is equal one.

!!

Is this what is happening to the gaming industry?

@4ndyr0g3r50n

4 жыл бұрын

It happens to every industry. 1% of the people in any group get half of the total attention.

Principal is right but his maths was wrong E.g 1000 employees, 30 of them do half the work. 10,000 employees 100 do half the work

That's why i believe in small government

That's true. In Germany we have one problem. Mount stupid rules. I also worked for US companys. Teams act very different in the US. They know the one which carry the teams and support them because they know: If the ones with the know how leave than they will have huge problems. In Germany the average rule and they are lazy bones. Those having know how make their lives difficult. That's why they work against them. That's why we are in Germany today really bad. The problems in the US are comparable but in my opinion greed of the experts and the military indurstrial complex are the reason why USA fails. Canada is comparable to the US.

Your company gets shaky. You announce layoffs, the good people leave, you're stuck with the less productive people. Things get worse. You announce more layoffs, the best leave again. horrible situation. Is to the solution to this to hire with extreme prejudice, and fire easily: so sort out the problem before things get bad?

@Installation00

5 жыл бұрын

Interesting proposition. It makes intuitive sense, but I wonder if it would actually work in practice.

@razoropsrs8316

3 жыл бұрын

This is what large companies like Railroads, Caterpillar, and ADM do. There's a certain percentage of lower productivity workers that remain fireable for layoffs sake so that the more consistent and valuable employees do not have to be cut to stay afloat financially.

@benthurber5363

2 жыл бұрын

More or less how I intend to do hiring and training. I start my own school to train my future technicians to the standard I need and expect to discard at least half of each class; along the way, sorting and grooming talent to where it best fits. In addition, training employees to understand how their roles work together. Billable labor: The ones that perform billable work. Non-billable labor: the management and support staff whose soul purpose is to serve the billable laborers. (Interfacing with customers, sundry legal and financial tasks, logistics, HR, providing direction and incentives.) The trick then is to optimize the ratio of billable to non-billable laborers. Because the goal of non-billable labor is to maximize productivity of billable labor. To prevent their efforts from being truncated by non-billable tasks like taking out the trash or collecting money from a customer.

@ambitiousbeauty1013

8 ай бұрын

But why lay off the best workers? It would make sense to lay off the unproductive and lazy workers first.

Fighting a zero condition is not even possible anymore without extreme bravery and domination over others.Many others were good at it and it sent one down in zero. To fix it these "zero people" need access to work or gathering resources and other basics as well as the others. Therefore activity for profit and forever rising stock values is not the best system. The dominating people can't even continue with 1-10% of the population and the rest being on welfare or dead. The 0.5 % who are stock holders won't see the stocks going up anymore when 80% of the population are out of that system and collect debris from that system to survive. When the dominating people also give up there is no welfare or debris from any system except a few who kept dominating... In the final end there is one man in one corporation with stocks, but he is alone and it means nothing somehow.

It is politically correct to say we are all "created equal," not so, - nonsense! - Doesn't mean we don't have equal value, this is not the same thing.. We all know if we actually think about it as a fact, some people have higher IQ's than others, some people have much greater opportunities than others, some people will always work harder than others, this is a fact of life. No one with any intelligence can argue this. What is also interesting is, wherever you start off in life, certainly does not mean that's when you have to end up at the end of your life. There will always be people how ever hard it is, will work hard and grab every opportunity that comes their way, they will eventually rise above it, and there are also people it doesn't matter how how much opportunity comes their way they just won't take it, - lack of motivation, lack of ability to see opportunities as they arise, procrastination, multiple endless reasons, I could carry on,... others that insist on bailing them out at every turn, co-dependency. We fail people at a very basic level when we don't allow then to fail. Failure of allowing people to experience the consequences of their own actions is one of the worse things we can. We stunt their growing up, and maturing process, and it not good for the individual, and it's not good for society. People who mentally grow up and make something of themselves are not those who have never faced any difficulties, but those who have faced reality head on, and have required others to do so.

The discrepancy in publications could also be due to the fact that some PhD students need way longer to get their title than others, additionale one can’t compare publications without evaluating how much content and how much time was spend on these papers.... right?

The Islamic economical system has an obligation called "Zakat" wherein every able person has to annually pay 2.5% of their wealth to a fund which pays the poor and those in need. That is the only way the most wealthy would give back to the system.

@johnwalczak9202

2 жыл бұрын

and that immediately creates a problem - how do you know that that money is given to the poor, instead of being embezzled by the managers of the fund?

@waltonsimons7370

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnwalczak9202 That's exactly what often happens. The only way is to have the right people in the right places, proper audits, and transparency. Otherwise, bye bye money.

@ram47863

Жыл бұрын

@@johnwalczak9202 just give it directly to the poor

Price's Law, Zipf's Law, Pareto Distribution call it whatever you want.

I need to consume more information of people like this. Any recommendation?

@a92alireza

3 жыл бұрын

Thomas Sowell

So Jordan is making an observation, but what are we supposed to take from this? Several times he throws his hands up as if to say nobody knows what can be done, or if something should be done. No answers. No solutions.

@trieupham3524

2 жыл бұрын

He is making us think about it, be aware of it, because he is stating facts, not trying to say something wise, just facts.

@jdg7327

2 жыл бұрын

Because it's an insanely complicated situation. The time someone tried to fix it, millions of people died and starved. This is not simply a socialism vs. capitalism game. As he said, it's a fundamentally deeper issue than that. Even in socialism|capitalism this happens ( few people has everything and most has nothing ).

@Ikaros23

2 жыл бұрын

Nothing can be done if the " 20%" who stand for 80% of the productivity want`s it. The majourity can want all they want or put a autocrat in power, but then there will just be a brain drain. My point is if you are not one of the creators your " needs" or " demands" is not going to change the system.

@waysofzen

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe those are just the rules if you want to play this game of winners and losers. This may be the inevitable outcome of competition in any form, including things like music where listeners decide which music is good like Mozart (winners) and music that doesn't get airtime (losers).

wouldn't the least productive people leave if a company was going to collapse? Why would the productive leave?

@joelarrarte8486

3 жыл бұрын

Because they can see the writing on the wall and back their talents to land another job first.

@vedaventer7800

Жыл бұрын

The smart ones are smart enough to get new jobs quickly

I think Hi is falling into the Malthusian Trapp

While the square root phenomenon is strangely applicable to many things, I have to call BS here on one of his examples. He claims the following about economic gain (in the U.S. or Canada): "You have a 10% chance of being in the top 1% for at least 1 year of your life"... No. This is simply wrong and I have to call him out here. No matter how often I agree with Jordan Peterson (and I often do), this one is just WAY off. Hopefully he just had a long day and mixed up his numbers. What he said is the same as saying 1 in every 10 people will have accumulated AT LEAST $361,020 of INDIVIDUAL ANNUAL INCOME for at least one year in their life, if not more (*based on statistics from 2020; close enough to the date of this video to be comparable, and even if the actual statement was made several years before this video was posted, the difference in yearly statistics is negligible). Now... think about it like this... How many people in your life have you ever met? Not just the people you know personally, but how many people you have EVER met. This would include everyone from your neighbors, the waiters and waitresses at every restaurant you've ever been to, the taxi and Uber drivers, the school teachers, the grocery store workers, fast food employees, Walmart employees, the homeless, the prostitutes, your mother, your brother, your distant cousin Whats-her-name, your friend Bill, your enemy Jill, and her crazy babysitter.... ALL of them. How many of all of the people you've ever met... out of 10... are likely to have earned $361,020 or more of income for at least one year in their life? I guarantee you, out of all of those people, it's far, far less than 1 out of 10. Even if you account for the likelihood that most of us have social circles, even amongst strangers, which tend to be more limited in income... for the most part the majority of us have not met many, 'wealthy' individuals in our lives, except perhaps some of our doctors, the occasional business owner we interact with, and that celebrity we met or 'sort of' met last year, and of course a number of other people whom we would inevitably come across in the course of our lives. But these people are VASTLY smaller in numbers when compared to the MASSES of people listed before whom we meet and interact with randomly every day. Another way to look at Peterson's statement is to take any person born in the U.S. or Canada..... ANY person, and make the following statement: "No matter what degree of poverty, depravity, hardship, or discrimination you may have been born in to... statistically 1 in 10 of you will earn at least $361,020 or more of income for at least one year in your life." This is either a huge statistical inaccuracy, or an outright lie. Again... I'm hoping Jordan Peterson just mixed up his numbers, because if he didn't and he truly believes this, he is feeding a myth to the masses.

@DasMirror

3 жыл бұрын

TLDR

@librapaladin81

3 жыл бұрын

@@DasMirror You might as well have said... "I'm too lazy to read, but entitled enough to comment on something I didn't read" ... (with only a four-letter acronym)

@DasMirror

3 жыл бұрын

@@librapaladin81 TLDR

@librapaladin81

3 жыл бұрын

@@DasMirror Apparently you can't read more than one sentence at a time.

i do like alot of what he has to say, but "10 percent chance of being in the top 1% for at least 1 year of your life" sounds like a distinctly dubious claim (which incidentally he admits he doesn't recall a source for)

@dougallwinship

2 жыл бұрын

btw i am largely supportive of what he's saying i'm just positing on the content

I;d love to challenge JP on "successful". There are the morally successful - moral hero's, then there are the talented and creatively successful. The financially successful are lauded the most, but that is totally distorted as to what real "success" in life means.

According to this rule, 84k people are doing half the work in the world. That's obviously not true for normal labour, but I think it is somewhat believable if we're talking about innovation. Maybe a little more extreme than reality, but innovation is driven by a small group of very hard working people

I disagree the underlying idea when he says that 1% of the population would always have most of the money. It sounds like he means that it is not possible to fix the inequality issue because of distribution. The thing is that the curb might keep its shape, sure. But you can slide it left or right. It would be (but not exactly) like playing Monopoly but you have to quit the game when you have X usd left, before you have nothing.

Let's talk about this man. What does he honestly think he knows about existing in the real world? He lives in a fantasy.

Talk about people who are trying to survive. Ph.D. does not enter in this equation. Fifty million people. Let's talk about that.

Time for communism and equal share of girlfriends.

What he is saying is totally false with some truisms. Yes - some people are more productive than others which is natural. Even though the percentage of the people who work more has not been measured scientifically . BUT the HUGE SIZE of the gap in inequality cannot be attributed to abilities for productivity for the following reason. Billionaires accumulation of wealth is NOT solely the result of their efforts. They depend in a high degree on the public sector for FREE technology and cheap or FREE credit. And of course, they pay NOT appropriate or NON taxes on their profits...Then when they create monopolies or oligopolies it is very easy to expand their production and eliminate all competitors... How is this moral? How it is moral to receive from the public sector the internet. GPS, all the technology you need to build an iPhone, the biotechnology to produce an MRNA vaccine and all these great inventions which changed out life in the 20 century for FREE and as a company to avoid taxation...and therefore you are able to accumulate so much wealth.. ? Peterson is just misleading students who know nothing about these things... It is really sad...

@justind6983

2 жыл бұрын

sources?

@dsgio7254

2 жыл бұрын

@@justind6983 You can google that "How the Government Created Your Cell Phone." and more biotech, computers the internet etc "Synopsis. The Entrepreneurial State: debunking public vs. private sector myths stirred up much-needed debate about the role of the state in fostering long-run innovation led economic growth. According to conventional wisdom, innovation is best left to the dynamic entrepreneurs of the private sector, and government should get out of the way." Marianna Mazzacuto.

@c.e.n.o4830

Жыл бұрын

sources ?

@dsgio7254

Жыл бұрын

@@c.e.n.o4830 I gave above... Read the book if you are curious of course,,, plenty of sources in there ,,,

Elon musk work 12-16 hourd per day... At expense of 4 marriages and mental breakdown

@DimitriTheBarbarian

2 жыл бұрын

What’s wrong with 4 marriages. It’s 4 times the fun

I don't think Jordan Peterson knows what "exponentially" means.

@carterjfulcher

2 жыл бұрын

Why?

@adynamic7476

2 жыл бұрын

It's very likely that he knows.

@adynamic7476

2 жыл бұрын

Actually, I think you don't know what it does means. :)

2:44 terrible lie. He is trying to put everything to simple terms... Handel, Haydn, Listz, Ravel, Schubert, Chopin, Verdi, Rossini, Strauss... those names are played every day a lot on stages across the world same as his "big five".

@DimitriTheBarbarian

2 жыл бұрын

Simplified but not a “lie” and not “terrible” at all. You do understand that “top 1 percent” is not really 1 percent? Or do we need to calculate

@DS-yg4qs

2 жыл бұрын

@@DimitriTheBarbarian you can't calculate generalisation. What math? What calculations? Stop defending lies

@Tom-le3yy

2 жыл бұрын

​@@DS-yg4qs Academics cant think without extreme generalisations. If Jordan was an engineer for even a day he probably wouldnt stand behind half of his theories. However, the basis for those theories is very sound, he just exaggerates.

I don't agree. His example with that game monopoly that Everyone since born with the same amount and as we play on we loose is wrong. We are not born with same amount money, the 1percnt hold more than half of the worlds wealth and hold for generations they are not gonna let go of their fortune And I fell Jordan Peterson is always defending and advocating for the 1 percent.

Why aren't blacks leaving then 😡😡😡👎👎👎👎