Remember: you didn't choose the StuG life. The StuG life choose you!

@johnnysswordandshieldhdcli8730

2 жыл бұрын

StuG Life.

@kstreet7438

2 жыл бұрын

A reference I get. Brought to you by an Austrian man. ;)

@Stripedbottom

2 жыл бұрын

That's what the 18-year-old German conscript said in 1944.

@tiagoback

2 жыл бұрын

Stug life best life.

@billgates1549

2 жыл бұрын

I didn't pick the stuG life I pick the Panzer life

The Stug III is my favorite German AFV in WW2. I do you like the low silhouette of the Stug because it was much easier to conceal to knock out unwary allied tanks, although it must’ve been very cramped for the crew inside.

@RandomPerson-ob1hk

2 жыл бұрын

No turret so it's not as tall and the 3 people in there aren't anymore, I'd assume either they store less ammo or the crew was just cramped

@BHuang92

2 жыл бұрын

At least it's not as cramp as the Hetzer.........

@thesickrobot6924

2 жыл бұрын

German afv's weren't much worse in ergonomics than most other tanks at the time, except the Churchill I guess.

@Rubashow

2 жыл бұрын

Actually both the Panzer III and Stuf III are suprisingly spaceous. Of course they aren't comfortable but for a tank, not that cramped. There is a video of Sofilein and Chieftain sitting in one at the American heritage museum. You can check it out on YT.

@Siddingsby

2 жыл бұрын

The Hetzer was a nightmare for the crew. But the Stug III, even with the long 75mm gun, wasn't so bad.

Michael Wittmann, the German tank ace, started the war in a Stug III, the knowledge he gained in the vehicle carried over into the Tiger where he would rotate the whole tank over just rotating the turret, this gave him a fast turn radius and presented the most heavily armored section of the tank to the enemy.

@RusskiBlusski

2 жыл бұрын

@Sami Bentrad probably something like an sd.kfz 251. The most popular German half-track.

@LordNinja109

2 жыл бұрын

Michael was an overrated tank commander

@RusskiBlusski

2 жыл бұрын

@@LordNinja109 Not only that but he was also SS scum. Much more respect for Otto Carius as a German tank ace (if anyone). Who was part of the Wehrmacht.

@LordNinja109

2 жыл бұрын

@@RusskiBlusski Wehrmacht wasn't any better

@RusskiBlusski

2 жыл бұрын

@@LordNinja109 Wehrmacht wasn't even close to as bad as the SS was, and denying that is Ignorant.

I love the contrast between the gritty and realistic film scenes and Girls Und Panzer's racecar with a gun

2:15 Tali-Ihantala 1944 is mostly realistic movie of tank warfare. Soviet had 600 tanks and Finns few and some StuG III. Panzerfaust was unpracticed new weapon. Most effective was Gefechtsverband Kuhlmey`s fighterbombers who got hundreds kills in air and ground.

The Germans did an excellent job with mass producing assault guns to fill in the gaps of tank production. We tend to focus alot of attention towards the later models of German heavy tanks but the Stug 3 actually killed more Allied armored vehicles and was used everywhere German soldiers fought. From Russia to Africa to western Europe the Stug 3 was the main anti tank weapon for Germany. Actually when you think about it since Germany had limited resources when it came to oil and manpower building alot of cheaper inferior tanks wouldn't have helped them much because it takes time to train combat troops and again oil was hard to come by later in the war also the limited soldiers was a constant problem. Having tanks and assault guns with very effective guns and being easy to hide in villages and forests makes alot more sense than just producing thousands of medium tanks with weaker armor and main guns like the Sherman or T34. Especially if you're on the defensive trying to stop the Allied forces from advancing into your territory. Another common misconception was that even though the Allied air forces were gaining air superiority they really had a difficult time try to spot German tanks on the battlefields because the Germans were very good at hiding them and more times than not bombing raids over German positions did little effect at destroying German armored vehicles because the aircraft at the time had limited success at dropping bombs accurately. So when M4 Sherman's or T34s did advance into combat zones they were met with alot of fully intact armored divisions of German tanks and assault guns firing at them from heavly defended camouflaged areas.

@samuelgordino

2 жыл бұрын

True but allied air power was very good at killing support trucks. No support trucks equalls no spare parts, no amn and no fuel.

@PHOBOS1708

2 жыл бұрын

@@samuelgordino they were good at bombing support routes and concentrations

@lavrentivs9891

2 жыл бұрын

The StuG was not a measure to fill in the gaps of tank production, but to give the infantry an effective self propelled support weapon, it's why the StuG were crewed by artillerymen rather than tankers. Only during the second half of the war were StuGs sent to tank units to fill in the gaps and were then crewed by tankers.

@seanmager1168

2 жыл бұрын

Garrison Nichols- You do make Some VERY GOOD Point's. Here is a Few things I Wanna Add though. Yes the Stug-3 Was Good. Though I MUST say an its True, The Stug-4 Was Better. Stug-4 Had SLIGHTLY Better Armor. And Also, Yes the German's could and did hide their Tank's and Tank Destroyer's in Village's an Forest's did Help them SOMEWHAT. But Not enough. As of course the German's would have to take their Armored Vehicle's out of their hiding spot's sooner or later. An then we would be able to destroy them. An also, If some Bomber's or Artillery like destroyed the Hiding spot's where the tanks Were, even if they were not destroyed, They'd still be out the Fight. As if the house or Cave or Tree's or Part of a hill came crashing down on the tank's, They'd be stuck. And also, About Air-Support Attacking the tank's on the Ground, Yes the Number's of tanks taken out By American and British Air-Support, It was Not Big. But it was Still Pretty Good. An also, The American and British Fighter's an Fighter-Bomber's they did Not have to always Get a DIRECT Hit to Take out a Tank. Like, If the Rocket's or Cannon Shell's Fired from the Plane's like say, Knocked out a Track on the tank or Hit Near the engine, its a GOOD Possibility the tank would be stopped. And also, The Fighter-Bomber's could Carry some Pretty Big Powerful Bomb's and even if they did not Directly Hit the Tank's, If they Hit still REAL CLOSE to the Tank, The Shockwave could still Take out the Crew inside an Also REALLY Shake up the tank an mess up it's system's an stuff an the engine. And also With SO Many American an British Air-Plane's Flying around and attacking an dropping Bomb's an Shooting Rocket's, 1 of them was surely bound to Hit a Tank. And also, If the Plane's could not Kill the tank's, Well then they could for sure Kill the truck's an car's an horse pulled wagon's and lightly armored vehicles that were supporting the Tank's by carrying ammo an spare parts an fuel. And also with The American an British Long range Bomber Force constantly and CONSTANTLY POUNDING Germany's city's and SEVERLY Harming Germany's war production power an also Destroying bridge's and railway stations and yard's and also oil production facilities and storage facilities this made the German's situation EVEN WAY WAY WORSE.

@righty5890

Жыл бұрын

STuGs didn't do good in africa iirc

hi Johnny, have you ever seen the 1946 French war film 'La Bataille du rail/The Battle of the Rails'? It's probably best known for using a lot of weaponry and equipment captured during the war, most impressively a real German armoured train. Maybe check it out sometime, or if you do an episode about military trains in cinema/TV.

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

I haven't seen it! I love armored trains so I'll add it to my need to watch list and see if I can work it into something!

@billyponsonby

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyJohnsonEsq Strelnikov’s armoured two-car train pulled by a red locomotive in Doctor Zhivago is a good one.

The scene in band of brothers shows a rare underbelly shot. An extremely rare occasion, but portrayed in a physically possible way. The bottom being the thinnest armor, but no one would expect a shot there. Very exciting!

Random details StuGs were part of the artillery branch. Stugs as indeed do direct fire support but from time to time may offer indirect fire support, they are artillery pieces. Even with the longer 7.5cm gun, they are and will always be considered an Assault gun "capable" of doing a tank destroyers role. This is because StuGs are primarily organized into independent battalions which can be attached or detached to other battalions, brigades, or divisions. It was I usually planned for every infantry division to have one or two Assault Gun Battalions. This was because the StuGs primary role was to provide heavy fire for the infantry. Assisting the infantry with assaults and breakthroughs yet not doing the assault or breakthrough themselves due to their vulnerabilities like a lack of a rotating turret. The StuG while not a tank destroyers did intact substitute for tank destroyers because it was capable of doing so. Tank destroyers battalions occasionally replaced it's loss units with StuGs. In some cases entire tank destroyers battalions created with StuGs did occur but rarely. There are many StuG variants but the most important is the StuG III Ausf. G, this was the most produced and would stem the other important variant. The StuG III Ausf. G stood for the Sturmgeschütz III or assault gun as it is known, it utilized the 7.5cm StuK 40 L/48 gun based of the Pak 40 but not being a Pak 40, the gun designation also tells the role of the tank. Based if the StuG III Ausf. G was the StuH 42, this stood for the Sturmhaubitze 42, the name meaning assault howitzer. This used the 10.5cm leFH or 10.5cm leichte Feld Haubitze translating to light field artillery. This vehicle was meant specifically to go bunker busting, though it also worked in some basic StuG roles. It was mostly built of the G chassis rather than F. About 1300 were built. StuGs will often be seem with the basic mantle that's quadrilateral in shape but occassioanly the saukopf mantlet "pig head" may be seen As a random thing, screw the Panzer IV and StuG IV, those are ugly as hell, lack of symmetry, just looking off, etc. Panzer III and StuG III superiority.

@fredderf3207

2 жыл бұрын

Many years ago, I had a group of friends that used to get together for large, table-top, 1/300 scale Micro Armor wargames. In one game I had a "game battalion" of infantry and a section of three Stug IIIs with long 75mm guns which, to the other players surprise, I used used as an artillery battery in support of the infantry, to control an important river crossing on my flank of the 12 foot x 6 foot game table. My friends later told me they had never considered using Stugs as artillery. But it worked!

the StuG III’s last combat action was in the Six Day War of 1967 where it was used by the Syrians as a mobile artillery and you can see some of them in the war museums in Israel alongside other WW2 German tanks such as the Panzer IV and Jadgpanzer IV. Here’s a video from Mark Felton: kzread.info/dash/bejne/f5abuZt8aaqWeJc.html

@dovidell

Жыл бұрын

Yad La Shiryon , Israel's armoured corps memorial , and tank museum , located at Latrun , central Israel ( down the road from where I live ) has a whole bunch of former axis tanks and assault guns on display ( as well as MANY examples of the Sherman and Centurion tanks )

@ahnafusaid8028

6 ай бұрын

The Stug3 was actually an artillery not a tank destroyer.

NEVER a disappointing episode; keep 'em coming!

Hilarious scene from Indiana Jones. The look Hitler gave after slamming the journal into his chest 😂😂😂

Authentic StuG Ausf G’s from Finland are seen in “The Eagle has landed” on a train bound for the eastern front during the SS confrontation

Great job. You have the ability to make your points quickly and not boring your audience. As for the StuG: it was a means of giving precise firepower to hard targets that were identified by those who needed it most(front line infantry). It was served by artillery units and was highly sought after by artillery men as the ability to gain recognition, promotion and medals. The opportunity offered in SuG units was FAR superior to that of those serving traditional artillery guns. When Germany was ascending, and on the offensive, the StuG fulfilled the role of Assault Gun. When Germany was on the defensive(say after Summer of ‘43) the need for Tank Destroyers became a priority. After the switch from Assault Gun to Tank Destroyer, I’m not sure as to artillery units crewed StuG’s or more traditional Panzer troops.

@mbr5742

2 жыл бұрын

It often depends on the unit the vehicle belongs to. StuG as part of a panzer unit would be crewed by panzer troops

The StuG is probably one of my favourite ww2 tanks!

Stug3 will always be in my heart. The soft factors of it makes it really nice. Instead of waiting around for a Tiger or something rare, a Stug is common enough that it is more often supporting infantry in the attack. I dont know about you, but i rather going in with a stug support over hoping a allied tiger can come over.

Just rewatched band of brothers and the STUGs look so good all the vehicles! Show holds up so well

Stug 3 is an excellent tier 5 TD

I'm always impressed by the variety of footage you have in these video.

More gup, never enough gup. Also had idea of ships in film. Thinking of Vanguard's turrets standing in for Hood's in Sink the Bismarck, and the plethora of crusiers involved in The Battle of the River Plate, two of which actually played a some role during the actual thing. HMS Achilles being apart of the battle (INS Dehli at the time of filming) and HMS Cumberland being the second heavy cruiser of Force G, although wasn't present during the battle she did join the two Leanders in patroling the estuary.

Mr Bean and Girls und Panzer? Masterpiece. 10/10

I always loved StuGs because of their odd shape. For there power, these things were tiny.

You know that feeling when you've been fighting hard from beginning to end but get absolutely overshadowed by your overly popular teammates that barely did anything useful? Yes, that's how it feels like to be a StuG.

Gun: M97 trench gun (thin red line, trench 11, and a few frames in windtalkers) Vehicle: Japanese Hachi tanks (The pacific and windtalkers)

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

I totally forgot there were tanks in that movie!

Like I said before: I wonder if there are any Movies and TV shows that feature the Stuart Light Tank. Great Vid again Johnny!

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for popping by twice! I added the Stuart to my to do list 🙂🙏

@mugsnvicki

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyJohnsonEsq Try 1970 The Adventurers for M5s in action, also lots of M8s

@davidbell1250

2 жыл бұрын

In the 1943 film 'Guadalcanal Diary' there are a lot of M3 light tanks in the final battle scene, it was filmed at Camp Pendleton only a year after the actual battle.

@janblake9468

2 жыл бұрын

An old Latin American movie, maybe 1983 "Under Fire" with Gene Hackman and Nick Nolte, has M3 Stuarts. Was filmed in Mexico which was still using them.

@verygrumpy

2 жыл бұрын

There is an episode of The Tilight Zone where a Stuart & crew find themselves at the battle of the Little Big Horn in 1876

Definitely my favourite German tank, along with the Mark IV. When the plan was put forward for the original Sturmgeschutz III it was stipulated that it had to be no taller than a man. Actually it stood at 7 foot 1 inch. Not sure if the comparison with the Sherman is a good one. Like all tanks the Sherman was a compromise. And the engines which were most available at the time was the big rotary aircraft engines which took up quite a bit of space. If you compare the Sherman to the British Cromwell tanks with it's Rolls-Royce Meteor V12 petrol engine you can see how much shorter the Cromwell. Some 10 to 19 inches. And the Cromwell also had an aircraft engine. The Rolls-Royce Meteor engine was the Merlin engine as used on the Spitfire but without the supercharger. This made it the fastest tank used in WW2 with a top speed of 40 MPH

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Not necessarily a fair comparison you are right. Just a good visual for how a low profile can be a major advantage for an ambush oriented tank.

Well deserved large channel growth! Glad to see results coming from video quality increasing

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much 🙏

0:48 If you are interested to know, whenever a word in German starts with an St, it gets pronounced as if it was written Sht. So basically you say Sh before the t. Shturmgeschütz.

@blondknight99

2 жыл бұрын

Shteiner is coming in! Demarkation!!

In a scene from "The Eagle has landed" (1976) there are also STUGs on a train. And in "Charlotte Gray" (2001) we also see such a fake copy STUG. Nice video!

@colinbarron4

2 жыл бұрын

The scene with the STUGS on a train in 'The Eagle Has Landed' was filmed in Fiinland which still had genuine SRUGS.

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

ah crap! I totally forgot that scene.

@andrewstamford1988

2 жыл бұрын

I stop watching the film after that scene. In case you haven't come across this... There is an amusing brief anecdote about that by stuntman Jim Dowdall who worked on the film and had a brief discussion with Michael Caine concerning the Stug during the filming in Finland. From The Tank Museum collection: kzread.info/dash/bejne/a2itj7pspamWp7g.html at about 6:50

Outstanding video and presentation.

Beautiful tank destroyer

Can we just aprreachiate that they got a fucking Stug in a Mr Bean film :p

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

I know right??

For any of you that have an interest in playing the gold standard of WW2 tactical video games, try the Combat Mission series which my friends and I have been playing for the last 20 years. We just finished a scenario from the Red Thunder module which covers battles in 44 and 45 on the eastern front. In this particular scenario the Germans have two King Tigers why the Russians have about 25 tanks including two ISU 122's. Interestingly each side also has some Shermans. The Russians because of lend lease and the Germans because they captured one. The Russians lost 22 of their 25 tanks while the Germans only lost 2, both of them Mark IVs. The King Tigers are basically invulnerable. One of them took 15 hits, 6 on it's rear including 3 from a ISU 122 firing AP. The shots from the T-34's that had the 75mm bounced off like tennis balls. If you want to get an idea of the gameplay there are many videos on You Tube about Combat Mission.

Thank you. Good video.

Fun fact: The Finns calling out a "Sotka" (bluebill in English) in the Tali-Ihantala scenes is a T-34. That includes all T-34 variants.

@AremStefaniaK

2 жыл бұрын

what exactly was the fun part of the fact

@teemuhotari7422

2 жыл бұрын

@@AremStefaniaK you must be a great mate to have in a party. - Abraham Lincoln

@XtreeM_FaiL

2 жыл бұрын

T-34-85 was "Pitkäputkinen Sotka". Long barrel bluebill.

@keskikokov

Жыл бұрын

Not bluebill, but common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula). Now called Telkkä in Finnish, Back then it was called Sotka. Confusing enough, sotka now means genys of diving ducks (Aythya).

Great Video!! Loved all the information Johnny....Enjoyed it..

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comment brother

1:11 pog he included GuP der Film :vvvvv 1:49 POG HE INCLUDED THE GuP SERIES

0:53 Ah yes the classic "pretend to be a medic and hope not to get shot" trick

@martinmethod427

2 жыл бұрын

I wish the there was the Swiss Air Force Cross (That's technically what it is), but the circle and cross had inverted colors, but the American Red Cross gets real pissy about the presence of the red cross in media, and I mean REALY PISSY.

Another good one Johnny!

Enjoying your content! Simple yet, effective! Keep up the great work. 👍

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Thank ya kindly!

@paulgrant7949

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyJohnsonEsq Your welcome mate!! Credit, where credits due! You say your an amateur, but you're pretty well researched and a bit humble to boot! Good work. 👍🇦🇺

Excellent video

Really good videos….. always enjoy them

Another great video!

As always great videos

good review~!

Ooh lucky me just came from your Spanish war movies video and I get an upload just as I finish

A strange concept in technicality, but overall, it still stays an awesome tank in its own right in my eyes.

The new movie sisu features a Stug. It really shows how hard it is to fight an armored vehicle like that when it has supporting Infantry and you don't have the correct anti-tank weapons

to those that don't know. The scene where the stugs retreated when the shermans arrived, weren't just because they thought they can't match the shermans. while a sherman's gun can penetrate a stug III, the shermans shown in the scene together with Easy company were just a small force who were part of an even bigger force going for a push along the lines. there were many more shermans in the surrounding areas during that time, not just the three to four shown in the scene. even a jagpanther can easily get penetrated by a 75mm from the side, not to mention the threat of infantry

@LordNinja109

Жыл бұрын

It's hard to focus on only one Company in a very large battle and still show the true scale of things. But something of note was that most of the StuGs in that battle were fresh replacements. The sight of enemy tanks that knew what they were doing (regardless of armor and gun stats) could cause green troops to dip.

nice video man ive been a supporter since 2k

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

That's original gangster stuff man! I really appreciate it. 🙏👍

The StuG III was great if you wanted something built fast. It was simpler the King Tigers 1 and 2. Thank You for this Video.

Good video...thanks!

All i know that, it never meant to do a tank job like charge and breakthrough enemy defense line but it also kinda blur on what the Stug were made to do. Is it mobile assault gun which meant to assault enemy defense while also support the infantry and especially their main element of tank or it is a tank destroyer, meant to stay behind the main element and provide rear protection or destroy enemy armor at longer distance. The German seem to prefer using Stug in both way. Plus, the only major drawback of German TD and assault gun, is it was turretless, meant it had to turn the whole chasis in the direction it meant to fire it's gun. This could be disadvantages if fight in area where there's little room of movement like cities, village and dense forest. Even worse, without Infantry support.

@mbr5742

2 жыл бұрын

If you look at the development and it's branches the initial use becomes clear. The original used the 75L24 howitzer (same as early Panzer IV) and where attached to the infantry as mobile gun platforms to deal with bunkers and (using HE) enemy infantry. Similar to the 75mm Infantry gun but with better crew protection. With the war it was modified to carry a longer 75L42 and then 75L48 since it was the fastest way to get that gun (similar to the PAK 40 AT gun) into a tracked and armored chassis. Problem was that now the infantry no longer had a support gun. So in comes the StuH 42, a StuG with a 105mm howitzer

i saw a Hetzer in the Panzermuseum Munster! i like its design 👌 thank you again Johnny

Seeing a German AFV in a Telugu language music video is something I have never thought to be plausible. Yet here it is. Brilliant work as always Johnny.

I'm getting some 3D printed minis of these for my Axis&Allies board game. Cost:5 Movement: 2 Attack: 2 Can Either Pair To (+1 A Mechanized Infantry Unit's Attack) OR (Target Select Armored Vehicles On A Roll Of One) Depending On The StuG Model Variation. Defense: 3 Transport Space: 1 Per Naval Transport

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Probably one of my favorite board games. Very cool.

@warpartyattheoutpost4987

2 жыл бұрын

Test played it and added Target Selection on Defense. It really helps balance the Eastern Front.

Great summary. Good length. New sub here!

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Welcome to the channel!

If you do one of these "in the movies" on muskets, you could use the axe-musket from Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter for comedic effect or inaccuracy. I believe at the end of the horse chase/stampede clip he uses it for maybe like 2 seconds

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely would be using that scene.

It's so good seeing Girls und panzer

I play a game called war thunder. And the stug there is a masterpiece. Good armor, low profile, good gun and generally fast makes its an excellent tank hunter as described in the video. When using it i dont mind the fact it has no turrut. Infact i actually prefer it sometimes bcs the front armor is always facing the enemy when you are aiming. Stug is surely one of my favourite armored vehicles all times

@AremStefaniaK

2 жыл бұрын

you must mean the microsoft snail simulator 2013

@generalsquirrel9548

2 жыл бұрын

@@AremStefaniaK since when is gaijin owned by microsoft? No i mean snail thunder

0:30 "What the hell is that?!🤣" Me while cleaning 1:72 Stug 3 F wheels

That was very nice Johnny, ;-). Some great footage, from the Finnish movie. Have a nice weekend. Looking forward to the next one.

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

I knew you'd be a StuG fan.

@tabletopgeneralsde310

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyJohnsonEsq it is an amazing vehicle and a great help for the soldiers, the StuG was the "poor man's tank". Because of the kind of warfare it needs to perform well it did fit perfect on defensive battle which also favors the soldier in the foxhole.

As a tank enthusiast your videos saying what movies are great tank movies I can’t appreciate you enough.

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks Andrew! I'll try to do another tank video in the next couple of weeks

@andrewwillard5625

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyJohnsonEsq oh Jonny you spoil me with responding like a real Alfa chad I can’t wait to watch whatever videos you post.

they should just make a ww2 movie were a small group of american soldiers are hunted in the woods by a stug-3 with them having the constant feeling of distant tractor noises

Let’s go Johnny 👏👏👏👏👏 let’s go Johnny 👏👏👏👏👏 love your videos bro glad I found your channel

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much. And welcome!

after ALL these years, I finally noticed -- thanks in part to you, Johnny -- that the StuG3 mockup used in BOB was Good---but simply too tall. I never paid attention to road wheels...until the last 3 days. I MUST be gettin' old....

There was a StuG briefly in the movie "1984."

Awesome. I love the Stug.

The finnish “*TULTA*” hits harder than Will Smith

Another banger video boi

Thank you!

Some of the best names for tanks and these two are some of them

Finland had a whole lot of StuG III's and kept them in army reserve until the 80's, so all of them are in top-notch condition and nowadays are regularly seen in museum events.

1:56 Love history team and there StuG

I love the use of the "autograph scene" from Indy Jones :)

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

I had been dying to use that clip for a long time. Love that movie.

Something about the Jagdpanter that makes it my favorite tank

You should have include the "cursed" GUP camo skin from ep4

The StuH 42 is very cool too ^^ Did you know that the StuGs and the StuHs were part of the german Artillery?

@mbr5742

2 жыл бұрын

The Sturmhaubitze 42 is a StuG with a 105mm howitzer. The choice what any vehicle would become was made very late in production when the gun was fitted and you could change a StuG to a StuH and back at the higher maintenance levels (depot maintenence)

You missed the brightly painted and flagged StuG in Girls and Panzers. I just bought a cheap old Tamiya StuG to build that.

The Stug is also the most popular model for those that build armour hobby kits.

Interestingly, the StuG mock-up in Saving Private Ryan is a swedish Stormartillerivagn (SAV) m/43 (Assault artillery vehicle model /43), a vehicle based on the swedish license produced Strv m/41 (Pz.38(t)/TNH) chassis with a new superstructure and a 10,5 cm howitzer, built for the same infantry support purpose as the StuG.

@williamzk9083

Жыл бұрын

There were also about 1299 StuH 42 with 10.5cm gun produced so its a good mock up.

It should be noted that the StuG III is primarily operated by the Artillery branch of the Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS. Dedicated tank destroyers such as the Jagdpanther, Jagdpanzer IV, and Hetzer are operated by the the Panzerjäger branch. Thus, in a Panzer or Panzergrenadier Division, you have the tanks operated by the Panzer, the StuG IIIs by the Artillery, and the tank destroyers by the Panzerjäger.

@williamzk9083

Жыл бұрын

Panzejraeger like the Nashorn were still opperated by artillery units I think.

The Most Successfull Tank Killer of WW2. A Remarkable and Outstanding Weapon of War. Simple but very Deadly.

My favorite ww2 German Armored vehicle. Small size makes it perfect for ambush tactics against any unsuspecting allied tanks. That's unless the outnumber 60 to 1 or that they have plot armor

Awesome video!!! You ought to do a video of vehicles made to look like an enemy vehicle, something like the TV series "Rat Patrol" where there is an obvious US M7 Priest mocked-up to look like "something" German, possible a Stug. Think "Hogan's Heroes" had an M7 Priest mocked-up to resemble something German and called it a "Tiger". Or the German movie, "Das Brucke (The Bridge)", where there is "something" that is supposed to resemble a US Sherman. Might be an interesting subject - or not.

Love the clip of the Finns with their equivalent of the ppsh 41. Have you covered their version? Hit out of the ballpark as usual. 👋👋🔥🔥👍👍💪💪

@Viljami32

2 жыл бұрын

A small sidenote which you may have known: the finns made the ppsh (or as we know it, Suomi konepistooli --> Finland submachinegun) was made first, in the 1939. The Soviets saw the design and started changing things on it and it became the ppsh-41

@wtfronsson

2 жыл бұрын

@@Viljami32 That's not accurate. Soviets did take a look at the Suomi blueprint, but didn't end up using basically anything from the gun itself. The soviets wanted to make cheap stamped steel weapons in large numbers. A Suomi was not at all what they wanted or needed. Suomi's were quite expensive and required a lot more man hours from highly capable craftsmen to manufacture. They did however copy the drum magazine design.

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

Not yet but it's on the list! :)

@iowa_lot_to_travel9471

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyJohnsonEsq looking forward to it as always. 👋👋👍👍

@virologi3348

2 жыл бұрын

It's actually related more to the Bergmann's MP-18

We used to have 3 ginger Tom's Red ,Stig and....Stig.. thanks for sharing this with us ,Johnny...

@eamonnclabby7067

2 жыл бұрын

APOLOGIES Stug....

Apparently the Stugs were a really difficult vehicle to crew with very limited visibility and little room inside for crew, ammo and gun with the sloped sides. Its amazing they were so effective.

@timoterava7108

3 ай бұрын

Compared to T-34 - the main adversary in Finland in 1944 - the StuG III had much better visibility and more room for it's crew.

Nice!

This madlad used Girls Und Panzer as well Amazing

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

I don't mess around

Fun fact: Michael whelhelman (a German tank ace) started with a STUG A

They are really good for ambushes. Try finding them in a ruined city, or dense vegetation... Also, in principle, you can mount a heavier cannon with more recoil than you could in a regular tank (turret ring, stress of recoil, weight too high, flipping...)

I’m glad I choose stug iii as my fav tank after knowing that it’s powerful and kinda op

Alkett or Altmärkische Kettenwerk GmbH wars the main producer of the StuG III (and StuH 42). The Friedrich Krupp Grusonwerk AG made all 1100 StuG IV after Alkett wars able to produce StuG IIIs again the StuG IV production ended

My favorite Stugs are Moe, Larry, Curly and Shemp

El Stug, el mejor blindado alemán....pequeño, barato y muy poderoso.

0:34 that STUG III was probably saying Lord help me where am I and why are there women dancing on me I am a death machine not a crappy night club.

That girls und panzer clip lol

At the beginninng of WW2 Stugs were used as assault SPGs, with thickest armor and 7.5cm gun similar to early Panzer 4, and it's purpose was to engage fortifications, being virtually immine to low-caliber AT-guns, destroy them and provide space for further assault into enemy's backline, as blitzkrieg dictated. The AT-SPG role was applied due to heavy need in weapons, capable of fighting Soviet tanks, and little to no fortifications as well as total failure of blitzkrieg.

Awesome vid, as usual! I gotta ask, what was that music video? It's stuck in my head!

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/X6uqktuyn6q_fKw.html

@mbryson2899

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyJohnsonEsq Mr. Johnson, you are a gentleman and a scholar! Thank you for the link. Here's Bad Girls: no StuGs, but some crazy cars and amazing driving. kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKmN1ZKgeqeTfKg.html

@mbryson2899

2 жыл бұрын

I absolutely LOVE the things my internet friends share, it shows that we all have more in common with everyone on this planet than I've been taught to expect. =)

@JohnnyJohnsonEsq

2 жыл бұрын

@@mbryson2899 I really appreciate having you on the channel. Good vibes and sharing info. That's what it's all about.

@mbryson2899

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyJohnsonEsq, you set the example and you raised the bar. Your channel is an examplar of what we could all have together. I may rib folks now and again but (no jinx!) I haven't seen the vitriol I see far too often elsewhere. I try to make it clear I'm just being an absurdist when I do tease.