Thank you.

Perfect for what I needed. Pretty place too

@BlackForestRecon

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks! Have fun with your binos!

I've been trying to find out what the name of these were. I remember using them out of the back of our Stryker looking for spotters on outer cordon. I just remember they were green and had pink lenses. Also the glass had a simple ranging reticle when you looked through them.

this video give a whole new meaning to the phrase "see something _SAY_ something" lol Nice noc's though :o)

Que binóculo espetacular! A imagem é mui bem corrigida.

i have this one ..nice

This is the most video 👍

Hi! Show what image in the twilight,fog?

I remember when everyone had a pair of these floating around the basement.

@ginesh540

3 жыл бұрын

Give me one..

@icyroadwarrior

3 жыл бұрын

used mine the other day

Oare mai este pe stoc acest model pe undeva?

I want zooming binocular because I love to see long distance objects like birds , animals, etc in the jungle, mountain etc ? If any idea sugest me which bino is best for Zoom and clear

@ricardosoto5770

2 жыл бұрын

Get a spotting scope, zooming binoculars are trouble. They are delicate, hard to collimate, and once you use the zoom, their image become too shaky to see well without a tripod or a gyrostabilizer. Also the exit pupils, become smaller and the zoomed in image becomes darker. That is one reason most serious binocular users, like the military, experienced birdwatchers and astronomers do not use zooms in binoculars unless they are huge, tripod stabilized giant binoculars.

@vitojohn8168

Жыл бұрын

Bushnell

Hab mir auch so ein riesen Ding gegönnt! Nagelneu in einer Plastiktüte verpackt 😂

👍👍👍👍👍

Are you selling these binoculars or are you just advertising it? And if you sell it, what price do you want for it?

@BlackForestRecon

4 жыл бұрын

I´m just a collector who is displaying his collection for other collectors or people who are interested. I don´t sell anything - sorry.

Great videos out in the mountians i could do with some help what is the better binos the steiner m22 or the Hensoldt zeiss green rubber armoured army 10x50 or 7x50 binos for the mountains any help would be greatfull and keep the videos up brill.

@BlackForestRecon

3 жыл бұрын

I would recommend the binoculars from Hensoldt. They are much more robust. Greetings!

@shaunhornby7897

3 жыл бұрын

Cheers pal for taking time out to reply back the 8x30 or 7x50 or 10x50 hensoldt which ones best for the mountians in all weather dawn and dusk any help again thank you my friend.

@BlackForestRecon

3 жыл бұрын

@@shaunhornby7897 If you want to go to the mountains I´d recommend you the 8x30 because of the lesser weight. For low light the 50s are better but they´re much heavier.

@shaunhornby7897

3 жыл бұрын

Ok thanks great could u do a video on the hensoldt 7x50 in the near future that would be intresting to see thanks again my freind for your time and honesty look forward to a new video.

Please give the link on description box

@jdvlog7098

4 жыл бұрын

Maybe u can buy on ebay

Canon Ixus ?? 🧐🧐🧐

Danke fuer das Video! Insgesamt macht dieses Glas einen nicht ganz schoenen Eindruck, gesondert betrifft das die Beschuchtung, die spiegelt sehr heftig. Ich denke, das Glas ist sowohl optisch als auch mechanisch dem alten Hensoldt DF weit unterlegen.

@BlackForestRecon

3 жыл бұрын

Ich bevorzuge die alten Hensoldt Ferngläser auch deshalb, weil diese noch aus Metall gefertigt sind und nicht aus Plastik.

@thomasfx3190

2 жыл бұрын

The Steiner has that iridium coating to prevent reflection AND prevent laser strikes on the user by Russians or North Koreans. I used these for several years for spotting artillery.

Hello, I left my country 10 years ago and my grandpa asked me to buy him a real military binoculars when I do come back. I was wondering where I could find a pair of these genuine binoculars. Thank you

@Hadouken5150

Жыл бұрын

Buy them online dude. They’re about $1,100 new.

Every time I take my M22 binoculars, made by Steiner or by Fujinon, I start to sing "La vie en rose".

@BlackForestRecon

5 жыл бұрын

It´s really a binocular for the optimists 😃

@micarri

5 жыл бұрын

👌👍

@dhinchakbabai3674

4 жыл бұрын

Is m22 best than uscamel 10×50 ?

@micarri

4 жыл бұрын

Sorry, I do not have the USCAMEL 10x50.

@jdvlog7098

4 жыл бұрын

Is this good for long distance to watch.

cat got your tongue

Where can I buy the telescope M22B

@BlackForestRecon

3 жыл бұрын

Got mine at ebay..

*SE VE ESTUPENDO, NO HAY "REBORDE" EN LAS IMAGENES QUE MUESTRA, SE VE LA IMAGEN CLARA Y NITIDA*

sorry for not knowing or lack of a better word ignorant are what would the numbers lined up exactly mean? thank you in advance for getting back at me.

@BlackForestRecon

6 жыл бұрын

You mean the numbers above the M22 mark? That´s the serial number.

@TheMarsgia

6 жыл бұрын

No, the numbers on the crosshair

@BlackForestRecon

6 жыл бұрын

That´s the range finding reticle which is graduated in 10-mil increment unit markings (e.g.: number 2 = 20 mils).

@slavensmolcic

5 жыл бұрын

@Hydroginn1 First,those numbers are short written angles in meters.In military,there is unit in use for measuring azimuth or object size which is called thousandth,or miliradian.One thousandth is angle which is equal to 1 meter at the distance of 1000 meters.So,if you are looking object that is one kilometer from you,and it's height on reticle is 15(on this binocular that is line between 1 and 2) it means that it's height is 15 meters.Also,if you can presume height or width of object,on similar formula you can calculate distance to the object.

@georgevdp50

5 жыл бұрын

When you read at 5:33 it says that the distance is effective size : size read x 1000mtr..

Hallo! Wäre der Steiner 7x50 ein gutes Fernglas für Wanderer und für das Wald? Gibt's etwas besseres in dieser Preisklasse?

@BlackForestRecon

2 жыл бұрын

Hallo! Wenn es nur zum Wandern sein soll, ist es etwas schwer. Ferngläser mit einem Objektiv von 50mm sind eher für schlechte Lichtverhältnisse gemacht und somit vor allem für Jäger, Militär und Seefahrt geeignet. Für den Einsatz bei Tageslicht reicht ein 8x30 Fernglas völlig aus und ist dabei noch viel leichter und kompakter. Ein gutes und preiswertes 8x30 Fernglas ist das Zeiss Deltrintem, das man gebraucht im Internet kaufen kann.

@westsenkovec

2 жыл бұрын

@@BlackForestRecon Danke für die schnelle Antwort! Ja, das ist mir bewusst aber ich habe mir gedacht wenn ich mich mir ein neues Fernglas zulege dann eins das ich auch in schlechteren Lichtverhältnissen benutzen kann und das Teil scheint kompakt für 50 mm. Ich habe gehört es soll robust sein.

@BlackForestRecon

2 жыл бұрын

@@westsenkovec Für ein 7x50 ist es relativ kompakt. Und robust ist es auch. Insofern ist das Glas sicherlich eine gute Wahl. Das M22 war übrigens auch eins meiner ersten Ferngläser, noch bevor ich angefangen habe zu sammeln. Der leichte Rotstich durch den Laserschutz war für mich nie ein Problem. Es kommt eben immer auf den Einsatzzweck an.

@PYTHONOPTICS

Жыл бұрын

Haben Sie schonmal sich mit einem Monokular probiert?

Are the hash marks for range, in meters ?

@slavensmolcic

2 жыл бұрын

Yes,meters.

@nelson0110

2 жыл бұрын

@@slavensmolcic Thanks 👍🏻

@slavensmolcic

2 жыл бұрын

You're welcome.Are you familiar with mills,or how do we here call it,thousandths?

@nelson0110

2 жыл бұрын

@@slavensmolcic yea, yea. 🙂

Da li neko prodaje

Ein Riesending

are these the gen ii or gen iii

@BlackForestRecon

3 жыл бұрын

Rather an earlier version - the later versions had different markings on them, so rather gen2 than gen3..

@PYTHONOPTICS

Жыл бұрын

@@BlackForestRecon They don't have intensifier tubes

Did they come with black eye piece cups too? Instead of the green?

@BlackForestRecon

3 жыл бұрын

You're right! Most of the Steiner M22s you see have green eyecups. But they also seem to exist with black ones.

@ricardosoto5770

2 жыл бұрын

@@BlackForestRecon Civilian market Steiners come in Nato Green, Nato Grey black, gloss black and Navy blue. So I wonder if some civilian market eyepieces found their place in the military production.

How do these stack up to the Fujinon M22?

@BlackForestRecon

5 жыл бұрын

Very simple: the Steiner M22 is the predecessor of the Fuji M22 (I got one too - video coming this winter.)

@adrianotero7963

5 жыл бұрын

@@BlackForestRecon thank you.

@ricardosoto5770

2 жыл бұрын

A friend of mine who is and avanced amateur astronomer, (he works with professional astronomers and gets published in peer reviewed astronomy journals) said that the Fujis are opticaly the best 7x50 binos you can buy for the money (700 to 800 USD), and opticaly they are as good as top end roof binos by the holy trinity of Zeiss, Leica and Swaroski over 2K dollars. They has tested them with profesional equipment in the Atacama in Chile. But they cost twice as much as the 7x50 basic Steiners and are much heavier, being of metal construction and rubber armor. They do come tripod ready unlike the Steiners so they use them a lot for astronomy. The Steiners are very good for hand held astronomy too, at half the price. Im my experience, they compare well with 1K USD roof binoculars of their generation (1980s, 1990s) for 1/3 of the price.

No zoom in zoom out?

@blake102989

4 жыл бұрын

no, they have a amazing view through them though

@ricardosoto5770

2 жыл бұрын

Few high quality military binoculars have zooms, they are a nightmare to collimate and focus and too delicate for military use. Zooming bicoculares are for amateurs who get low end disponsable binoculares or for very expensive tripod mounted astronomy binoculars. The military use zooms in monocular telescopes only.

I have a pair in great shape, thinking on selling them.

@slavensmolcic

5 жыл бұрын

Does your specimen also has purple look?

@anwarkhan-no6tv

4 жыл бұрын

Mjg pe becho

how much price it is of.

@BlackForestRecon

4 жыл бұрын

Depends on condition. Got mine at ebay for about 300 Euros.

@ricardosoto5770

2 жыл бұрын

You can get a Military and Marine Steiner 7x50s brand new in Amazon for 300 but not with military features like the laser filters. I hate those laser filters, everything looks pink. A friend of mine has a US army M 22 and I have a plain jane non filtered version, and I love mine for real use. The other is for collecting.

price?plz

@BlackForestRecon

5 жыл бұрын

Depending on condition: 200 - 300 euros (very hard to say).

@acdc4759

5 жыл бұрын

BlackForestRecon thanks

@DrStockmann

4 жыл бұрын

New in Germany 700-800 US Dollars

Is 10×50 better than 7×50 ?

@dhinchakbabai3674

4 жыл бұрын

Give me the official website of uscamel.... Is amazon.com best online shopping side to buy this product ?

@BlackForestRecon

4 жыл бұрын

Depends on your purpose. If you´re a hunter or birdwatcher 10x50 would be better. If you just want get a good view of your surroundings I would recommend the 7x50 as the field of view is much wider than the 10x50.

@teller121

4 жыл бұрын

@@BlackForestRecon generally for military use, is 7x50 the way to go or 10 x 50? Also, on Steiner site they have parallel pages of these models (and others) under the headings "tactical" and "military." Those under military go for about 75% more...and that's without range finders, etc. I just wondered what the basic difference(s) was that calls for 75% bump.

@ricardosoto5770

2 жыл бұрын

@@teller121 7X50 is considered the highest power most people can use unstabilized from a moving vehicle like a boat, tank, or helicopter without getting seasick, also they allow larger exit pupil for low light use at night. 10x50 are better for older people (50 plus) who are already losing night vision and their pupils no longer open as much, of for use during tthe day or in hightly iluminated urban enviroments like in police work. They can be darker and duller in low light seen by younger eyes. Older eyes wont see a large difference. 10x images are much more shakier, so for long observatios a tripod might be useful. If got the money now that Im over 50 ill get a 10x50 Fujis to suplement my 7x50 Steiners. And use a tripod for long observations.

@ricardosoto5770

2 жыл бұрын

The hability of binocular to pass light to the user comes rom two sources, the quality of the optics (more exoensive german/austrian or japanese is better) and the quality size of the exit pupils. To get that you divide the size in millimeters of the objetive lenses between the magnifcation number, 50mm/7x=7,1mm, 50/10= 5mm. Human pupils go from 4mm in daylight to 7mm in darkness, older people often loses it and go to 5 or 6mm at night. So at night 7x50, 8x56, 9x63 or 10x70 will pass the maximun light a human pupil can handle. 8x42 or 10x50 are fine at day, to see bight objets, in iluminated places or for use by older people.

Имею steiner m22 7•50m и Hensoldt Fero d16 8•30m, и если их сравнивать что- бы я взял с собой в разведку, то конечно Fero d16. Как по мне он лучше, лучше изображение, дальность, и конечно же вес. Он на половину легче , и по габаритам намного меньше чем m22. Сетка в Steiner на весь экран с одного конца на другой, в Fero d 16 она на половину меньше. Что из них лучше, это спорный вопрос. Долго держать m22 и наблюдать за чем нибудь не комфортно, так как вес о себе начинает говорить через несколько минут. С M22 удобно рассматривать объекты на расстоянии 200-300 м, ну а fero d 16 прекрасно работает на ближних и дальних дистанциях.

@user-fe2lt2xl7z

2 жыл бұрын

Человек надо знать в каких целях вы пользаете бинокль. Штанер 8х30 у него светосила 14 он для дневного просмотра выходной зрачок 3.75мм. Штайнер 7х50 высокосветосильный у него зрачок 7мм светосила 51 Он хорош в сумерках и.т.д

@user-fe2lt2xl7z

2 жыл бұрын

@Рога и Копыта День добрый! Оба хорошие бинокли 7-кратный бинокль м 22 военный он прочный сответсвует военным стандартом! Относительный яркость' светосила 50.Минус угломерная сетка' вес ' и обём большой. НО бинокль выпускалось 1988-года Рейнжер 8×56 выпускалос примерно 2010-годах светосила 49 по обёму тоже большой слабое место центральная часть' шарнир если уподёт сразу сломется. Рейнжер 1-крат больше он тоже вляет на дневных прасмотрах например туманость и т д. Цена дорогие если двоение' механические поврыждение тогда мусор. У меня есть бинокль штайнер ночной охотник 8×56 сломана центральный часть механически повреждения .Я его тачил немношко центавал колимиравал чтобы не было двоение и клейл и опят сломал клейл опят сломал чтобы найти подхадяши клей. Сейчас пользаваюсь главное не уронит землю. Советвую купит бпц 7×50' бпв-1 7×50 обо бинокли хорошие чёткость резкость и вес легче чем штайнер но они старые естественый минус желтезна. Можете купит старых годов 1980-1988 немецких бинокли цейс 10×50 с мульти просвитлением с центральным' и роздельных фокисировкой они хорошие только не надо купит цейс 7×50 Binoctem Эти бинокли ремонтировается и пожизненая гарантия. Если что обрашатесь

@user-fe2lt2xl7z

2 жыл бұрын

@Рога и Копыта Бпп8х30 Б8х30 би 8х30 они хорошие даже на этих биноклей ставили цейсвскйи оптики. По теори 2.5- 4мм выходных зрочках счетаются девным 5-7-мм высокосветосильным. Советвую 8× 40мм' 8×42мм обективы они средние компактные есть поро призма и руф призма Руф призма хорошо для дикого природу мин дистансях показывает муху' муравей птицы вообщем хорошо минус вечером смотрите на прожекторах не хорошая картинка. Если много прожекторах показывает тёмный картинка туманость и т д. Руф сложная техналогия на ремонт не пригодень. Эти бинокли старых годах 80-95 года сейчас они хорошо показывает но денги тоже хорошие. У меня на ремонте были разные бинокли разных брендах. Сейчас маркетингови экономика купил сломалься и на мусор. Ранше смотрели на качество а сейчас на количество. Ранше на биноклей дали пожизненый гаиантия! Сейчас есть но цена на них очень высокие! Нормальную бинокль купить нам нужен примерно 1500-2500-€ Я почти 4-года не могу собрать этих денег был разные биноклей купиль продал. Лучше пользовайте на здорове купите продайте главное был хороши линзы обектив чисты без грыбка без тумана быз пыли и царапин без двоени. Может тогда решите что взять.

@srejsrej514

2 жыл бұрын

Добрый день/вечер/ночь. БПО(с) 10x42 что-нибудь можете сказать, имеет эта вещь к себе интерес? Продукция казанцев вызывает сомнение, судя по отзывам.

@user-dn2jm1kp4z

Жыл бұрын

7×50 в разы мощнее чем 8 и даже 20 крат как по мне. Выходной зрачок 7.14мм делает своё дело.

Призма вк 7

Berapa harganya ?

not that good

@blake102989

4 жыл бұрын

because you're looking through them on a camera. Look through a pair in person and it is a better picture than the naked eye

@ricardosoto5770

2 жыл бұрын

@@blake102989 In the late 1990s I went to an optics shop and tested a civilian version without the rosy laser protectors against high end Bausch and Lomb and Leicas.... costing 2 to 3 times more, they were good and I walked out of the shop with ones. Still have them.

@blake102989

2 жыл бұрын

@@ricardosoto5770 I used to manage the army surplus store my stepfather owned but unfortunately we closed last year but people used to bring us their stuff in to sell to us. A few years back a guy brought in a bunch of stuff and in there was a pair of these exact ones in this guys video with the range reticle although they didn’t have the rubber cover but did have the rubber lens covers. I grabbed them as soon as we made a deal. I believe we paid $50 for everything he had so I essentially got them for maybe a couple dollars. I love them because the view is so clear and they work amazing in low light

@ricardosoto5770

2 жыл бұрын

@@blake102989 low light performance has always being Steiners forte. I cant wait to test some 8X56 Shadownquests. I use mine Steiners for stargazing, planespotting amd marine life observation mostly.

Inferad cramra

Army!..not Armee!.