I remember historical day in November 1988 when Space Shuttle Buran flew to space for first mission. After two orbits Buran (Snow storm) landed in fully automatic mode.

No comparison needed, Buran is obviously better

@MuhammadRizal-dk9hn

2 жыл бұрын

Agree

@PistonAvatarGuy

Ай бұрын

Because it trashed all of its engines every flight?

The Buran its very similar to Space Shuttle, but the Energia its fantastic, a massive rocket.

@user-mt8rr3jk6q

2 жыл бұрын

Based on the Energia rocket, it was planned to create a Vulcan rocket with a payload capacity of up to 200 tons. Instead of 4 side blocks with RD-170 engines, it was supposed to install 8, and also add a third stage. Currently, Russia is developing the Yenisei rocket, which is a continuation of work on superheavy missiles

@ErmolayNef

2 ай бұрын

Существовал проект Шаттл-С, саrgo, тоже без "самолётика". Надо бы - сделали бы.

The Sad thing was that the Side boosters of Buran were to be Reusable. It was supposed to have Wings and it would glide back on a runway like a Glider.

@peabody3000

2 жыл бұрын

why is that sad? i have often wondered if wings would be better than powered landings for recovered rockets

@doodleboi7034

2 жыл бұрын

@@peabody3000 The Sad thing was that this was scrapped, and we don't know if we can make this again.

@strikevipermkII

2 жыл бұрын

Thats Energia 2.0, but yeah. The main tank was also supposed to skip across the atmosphere and land as well.

@jesusramirezromo2037

2 жыл бұрын

That was Urgan (Energia 2.0), They planned on a fully reusable rocket The core would have delta wings and skip over the atmosphere, the boostets had deployavle wings

@PandoraPantam

2 жыл бұрын

@@doodleboi7034 Well i have good news for you: kzread.info/dash/bejne/gm2Mypeiqa_AY7w.html

No doubt BURAN is the best!!!

@ErmolayNef

2 ай бұрын

Ничем не лучше

@ClinchfieldRailfan

2 ай бұрын

then you must be russian

Energia is so awesome

@TheAeroAvatar

2 ай бұрын

Did you know there are attempts to bring it back?

buran is like the secound generation of space shuttle so it is very clear that buran is better

@masonrowden9730

3 ай бұрын

Nah it looks like a cheap Chinese knock off that tries to look better but just isn’t

@denzelklarenaar5883

2 ай бұрын

@@masonrowden9730 larger payload capacity, automatic landing and designed in a way that both sts disasters wouldn’t have happened

@ErmolayNef

2 ай бұрын

Ничем не лучше, даже без многоразовых двигателей. То же поколение, удалось криво повторить через 7лет.

@ErmolayNef

2 ай бұрын

​@@denzelklarenaar5883грузоподъемность определялась заданием. Система автоматической посадки сделана ещё в 1955 для самолётов в США, но нужна ли так она... Катастрофы как с Шаттлами были возможны тоже.

That's a really nice job! Recently I started to read and watch stuff about Buran, so YT keeps recommending me jewels like this one; I guess the algorythm gets smarter :) Where did you get dimentions etc. from? And would you care to share those 3D models?

@energiam880

Жыл бұрын

I got them from scaled blueprints from a Russian forum.

@alexandrucornelnistor1572

Жыл бұрын

​@@energiam880 Hello, could you be so kind to sent me the files for Energhia&Buran , these ones. I will try to make one in 3D , but I didn't find anyware such great detalis as you have. Please help me in this project. Many thanks in advance

@alexandrucornelnistor1572

8 ай бұрын

Hello Sir, I'm interested too for these plans...design....if I may. Could you be so kind to share with us, please. Many thanks in advance.

Buran is better but when the time of it's building process soviet union is.......let's say bankrupt 😅

Fucking yes bro! YES you are are on the right track to the future

People keep saying burin is better than the shuttle but the shuttle served 135 missions

@jerromedrakejr9332

2 жыл бұрын

Buran has only one mission, but not because it was bad, but because the state that made it ceased to exist. The shuttle ended its career due to well-known catastrophic events. Following the loss of two Space Shuttle missions, the risks for the initial missions were reevaluated, and the chance of a catastrophic loss of the vehicle and crew was found to be as high as 1 in 9. In other words - you have a better chance to walk across the minefield relaxed, with your hands in your pockets, unharmed than to survive the Space shuttle mission. P.S. Quantity and quality are two different things, although you Westerners have a habit of saying that quantity itself is a kind of quality.

How many missions did Buran perform?

@LexaGamer-fc8jd

3 жыл бұрын

Zero. The only flight it did was only testing.

@joaquinantonioarteta1205

2 жыл бұрын

the energia launched a military sat that crashed ( the sat not energia) the energia launced the buran once but it was a huge sucess

@BadmaOchirov50

2 жыл бұрын

Он один раз слетал в космос в автоматическом режиме...

@jesusramirezromo2037

2 жыл бұрын

Buran 1 Energia 2

Cool now put them in ksp

And the buran shuttle can take off......

While I like the Buran, I'm gonna be honest there that reminds me of the N1

@hugoflores5806

2 жыл бұрын

Its just soviet liquid propellant thechnology. From below it looks more like a soyuz

@odess4sd4d

2 жыл бұрын

mOaR EngInEs

....both of them....

Buran is very underrated

Нужно бы снова восстановить буран, мрию, «каспийского монстра» и других и создать корабли даже лучше.. Все были рады развалу СССР но только спустя время многие начинают понимать что мы потеряли на самом деле😊

Буран - гораздо более дорогая система без многоразовых двигателей.

there is only 1 reality and in this reality the Shuttle flew 135 times with humans on board and the Buran flew 0 times, there is no competition here, everything else is fictional

@energiam880

2 жыл бұрын

That's lovely, but this isn't really an ego-measuring contest. It's just my artwork But thanks for your expert opinion anyway. However, think it's probably best if you kept them to your self :)

@fixpontt

2 жыл бұрын

@@energiam880 my comment refers to the delusional commenters below me not your modelling work

@BadmaOchirov50

2 жыл бұрын

Неправда, Буран один раз слетал в космос в автоматическом режиме и он был явно лучше вашего шаттла

@jerromedrakejr9332

2 жыл бұрын

If you already insist on formalities: Buran had one mission. Buran's safety record is 100%. Shuttle's safety record is 98,52%. Buran has 0 losses, Shuttle has, how many, 14 lost lives? So far, 24 astronauts in American missions, 5 astronauts in Soviet and 1 astronaut in Russian missions have died.

When the space shuttle failed why didn't the United States buy the Russian space shuttle the Buran?

@BadmaOchirov50

2 жыл бұрын

Буран не российский, а советский космический челнок

@LadyNightFury1

2 жыл бұрын

I've heard that the NASA actually considered using the Buran after the Columbia disaster. But the only Buran that ever flew to space was destroyed by this time. All the other orbiter that never got completed got their components used for other projects, scrapped or abandoned.

the soviets only had to fly it once to realize the basic design was far too expensive, impractical, and dangerous to be useful.. it took 30 years for the US to finally resign to that

@doodleboi7034

2 жыл бұрын

Seriously, US does not Accept anything.

@RideAcrossTheRiver

2 жыл бұрын

Shuttle did more than any spacecraft ever did. It was a total loss to retire that capability.

@peabody3000

2 жыл бұрын

@@RideAcrossTheRiver anything shuttle ever did could have been done far more safely and cheaply, with other systems

@RideAcrossTheRiver

2 жыл бұрын

@@peabody3000 What other systems?

@peabody3000

2 жыл бұрын

@@RideAcrossTheRiver systems that were and still are in use today.. soyuz, atlas, etc.. and to flip the question, what did shuttle ever do that those systems can't?

tau.

Buran was better? It flew two orbits, just 85,000 km, just once, and unmanned, almost 40 years ago.

@Sentinelvs

2 жыл бұрын

Collapse of the Soviet Union stopped Buran progress. That is really sad :(

@kentershackle1329

2 жыл бұрын

Ya missed more, abt BURAN: all was done Autonomously. On way back, it senses flight line was a bit off, so flew over the airport and made 2nd attempt. Landed and even parked on its own, at the designated parking lot. 😂 Shes wayyy better.

@RideAcrossTheRiver

2 жыл бұрын

@@kentershackle1329 Yeah, sure, no, it didn't. Also, pilots fly better.

@sqiush2876

2 жыл бұрын

I will with you

@jerromedrakejr9332

2 жыл бұрын

@@RideAcrossTheRiver WHAT "it didn't"!!!???? Buran did not fly on his own and made second approach when landing? Of course it did! You know nothing and it is obvious that you are obsessed with American superiority. You are nothing more than a complete waste of time ...

I'm the only person that commented because I understand what does feel that you didn't have comments I feel an empty inside... and nice video 👍🙂

Buran can get to the moon, so its better. By a lot.

@sqiush2876

2 жыл бұрын

Shush

@zeebas1014

2 жыл бұрын

Roblox king The great why? buran is superior in a lot of ways

To be Honest, Energia was way more complicated and Better than The space shuttle

@PandoraPantam

2 жыл бұрын

Neat part is, it was less complicated, that´s the main reason why it was better

Buran has a lower percentage of returned parts. The number of engines on boosters speaks for this. The Chinese, when they copy Starship, will do the same.

@jesusramirezromo2037

2 жыл бұрын

Wich was actually an improvement The shuttle was MORE expensive to repair, than just use an expendable rocket The soviets made engines more powerfull and as efficient as the shuttle's, but far less complex and cheaper to build The Shutle engines where also dead weigth in orbit

Буран -- наша гордость и боль. Ну могли же такое - великая страна была СССР!

@desertedgoatgaming

Ай бұрын

Unless you disagreed with a dictatorship or were "lesser race" according to Stalin at which point you were tortured, gulaged and/or killed ... kinda sounds like another Nazi Germany with a Hitler in power when you think about it like that.

Buran was never used in a real mission so there is no comparison.

@BadmaOchirov50

2 жыл бұрын

Он вообще то один раз летал на орбиту Земли в автоматическом режиме и вернулся оттуда на аэродром, сомневаюсь что ваш шаттл был способен на это, так что глупости не пишите, раз не в курсе всего...

@jerromedrakejr9332

2 жыл бұрын

Every space flight is a MISSION!

@yurakondratuk253

2 жыл бұрын

@@BadmaOchirov50 и толку, что он слетал? Мкс строили шатры, а не бураны.

@BadmaOchirov50

2 жыл бұрын

@@yurakondratuk253 тут под этим видео некоторые писали что он вообще не летал, поэтому и написал что он всё таки разок слетал, а причём тут строительство МКС? Речь вообще не о нем.

@yurakondratuk253

2 жыл бұрын

@@BadmaOchirov50 у шатла был автопилот,на сколько я знаю. Так что приемущество автопилота очень спорное. Буран не стал рабочей лошадкой в космосе

They also stole the shuttle

@BadmaOchirov50

2 жыл бұрын

Никто ничего не крал, это собственная разработка СССР

BURAN .. THE BEST !!!

Cool graphics!... I am amazed the Soviets copied the Space Shuttle.. it was done with Soviet spies 👍

@jimmy950we5

3 жыл бұрын

The design for the NASA space shuttle were made public, and the Soviets observed and improved from the Americans design.

@allgood6760

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimmy950we5 Space Shuttle 2.0..👍🇳🇿

@jimmy950we5

3 жыл бұрын

@@allgood6760 Indeed

@nopas77

3 жыл бұрын

The Energiya Super heavy rocket can take off over 100 tons into the space. Space Shuttle it is not a rocket at all. Energiya can fly without Buran. Surprise! Can the orange fuel tank fly without Space Shuttle? Definitely not. Yep, Soviet engineers was copy body and wings, like Formula One copy your family van :) four tires, steering system, drivers chair, pedals on the floor, engine. Obviously if you do not see deeply than F1 and van are same thing. And Buran was completely automatic space craft from 1988! Think about it. Soviet Union can do it. And now nobody have it and can`t make system automatic landing. Maybe soon. Maybe. Buran touch down in automatic mode without engine with hard crosswind making its own decision due to the changed weather for additional maneuver. When Columbia have disaster and Space Shuttle program have been closed (NASA?) think about resurrection Buran. But they don`t do that after counting money and effort. Well, Soviet Union build it, others can`t repair it. Ahhh! One more I just remember. The fuel for Energia was oxygen and hydrogen. Energiya is first from series super heavy rocket for Lunar expansion. I understand you, you are offended that this system was not created in your country and not your engineers. But right now, it's just a history. Relax.

@pixel6698

3 жыл бұрын

The Buran was a heavily improved Space Shuttle. It fixed many of the Shuttle's fatal flaws and could even land automatically. The Energia rocket which the Buran would launch on could even fly without the Buran, allowing for much heavier payloads.

Soviet technology is best

Totally UNUSEFUL!

СССР USSR 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 США USA 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎

@albertandearthie7138

2 жыл бұрын

nooooooo

Такую страну прое#бали