The logical fallacy that Rupert makes is that a limitation of language (our inability to describe awareness and assign it attributes) is something other than just a limitation of language. We can use this same approach for any subjective experience. Please describe ‘redness’ and what it is to experience redness. You can’t. That doesn’t mean that red is an inherent and eternal aspect, it’s just the experience of our minds (via our visual machinery) meeting the world.

@TigerDragonStorm

10 ай бұрын

Your logical fallacy is using a false equivalence.

@GBBlue1

10 ай бұрын

@@TigerDragonStorm No, he's right. The trick here is mostly verbal. Because we are physical, our language is constructed according to the physical. Up, over, behind, down. So we are hard-wired to imagine things from a certain perspective. So any time we make something a noun, we imagine looking at it from an outside perspective. And this is what he does with consciousness. But there's no rational reason to suppose the consciousness that gives us experience and perspective, wouldn't also produce awareness of ourselves.

That was BRILLIANT!. I'm 67, and have read an awful lot on this subject - for the first time I understand the simplicity of Consciousness. I have spent far too many years with a logical mind trying to understand. I will watch this several more times. Thanks.

@nayavoie4977

3 ай бұрын

ش م٣صقحي😊 ٩٩أح٩آ٣٣احآحلحح عععخ، عه٨

Dear Rupert, I'm going to use a phrase that I once heard you use in relation to a university professor who was speaking at the Science and Nonduality Conference. As the professor shared his views about the nature of consciousness, you stated that you could feel your "saber begin to rattle." I interpetted that to mean that is was all you could do to hold yourself back. I believe that I witnessed that rattling again--in a most delightful--and insightful--way! :-) Bravo, my dear guru. You are one to whom I owe a tremendous debt of gratitude for helping to awaken my being to its true Self. God bless. 🙏🏻

I love Rupert, he is so brilliant in explaining Nonduality...

@robertknisel533

10 ай бұрын

Yes I found a way to know love as never before. I don’t formulate questions very well so over the years I have not asked Rupert many. But it has not seemed necessary as one simply has to wait until he answers the unasked. But the first time I listened to Rupert it was clear that I was hearing Truth and only then did I realize how much that meant to me.

@cakep4271

10 ай бұрын

Nah. I've had 100 friends talking about this at parties and coffee houses who were better at talking about consciousness than this guy. He just talks in circles about simple truths, Making things needlessly more complicated.

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis (alive, being) is dual to anti-thesis (not alive, non being) creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic or Hegel's cat (Fichte's cat). Schrodinger's cat is based upon Hegel's cat and he stole it from Plato (Socrates). Duality (thesis, anti-thesis) creates or synthesizes reality (non duality). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Form is dual to formlessness.

@robertknisel533

10 ай бұрын

@@cakep4271 Nah

@igorchemmykelly7202

10 ай бұрын

he is so brilliant in explaining ----------- A husband says to his wife: "Why does our dog always get good food, and I have to eat up all sorts of garbage left after everyone?" The wife replies: "Darling, but you can't explain it to the dog!" ))))))))))

Awareness doesn't require a rational process. This is SO profound and probably the reason nonduality is so alien to western paradigms. As an engineer, I find awareness is far closer to poetry, rather than science. Let yourself sink into consciousness until you only know peace and love, once you get there, revisiting that coherent state becomes so familiar and nurturing. 😌

I loved how Rupert guided him back to just 'be' to know and be aware that he IS indeed consciousness and that consciousness by itself is not a separate phenomenon. It is rather the source of all phenomenon. The hard problem is only as long as we dwell in the thoughts, emotions and feelings. From the place of looking, there is no problem. Here, there are no ideas, concepts and definitely no problems whatsoever. There is no time here either and so the question of eternity doesn't arise. 🙏

@kerryburns6041

10 ай бұрын

I like the way you express this -- to take it a little further can I suggest that consciousness creates the noumena, and through our senses we perceive the phenomena ? I take the idea from Kant´s work on the noumenon and the phenomenon, which I found very helpful.

@anandakumarsanthinathan4740

10 ай бұрын

@@kerryburns6041 , thanks much for your kind words. I have not read Kant's work, but have read a book or two by Ramesh Balsekar, a disciple of Nisargadatta Maharaj. Ramesh indeed refers to consciousness itself as noumenal. And as you mentioned, the noumenon experiences the phenomenon (external world) through the senses and mind.

@kerryburns6041

10 ай бұрын

@@anandakumarsanthinathan4740 I think you put it perfectly, describing the way consciousness explores itself through infinite manifestations, including you and I. Greetings from Andalucia.

I love Rupert Spira, a greater teacher you will never find. This video proves that sometimes the most complex questions have the simplest of answers. ❤

@aubreyekstrom8919

10 ай бұрын

You are not separate from Rupert, or Alan or anyone or anything. You too are a great teacher. 🙏

@lindsaycoffey3327

10 ай бұрын

@@aubreyekstrom8919 Why thank you Aubrey 😀 you honour me and likewise. Much love & respect ✊ brother.

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat superposition. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis (alive, being) is dual to anti-thesis (not alive, non being) creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic or Hegel's cat (Fichte's cat). Schrodinger's cat is based upon Hegel's cat and he stole it from Plato (Socrates). Duality (thesis, anti-thesis) creates or synthesizes reality (non duality). The rule of two -- Darth Bane, Sith lord. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Form is dual to formlessness.

@lindsaycoffey3327

10 ай бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 Exactly! I like your thought processes they echo mine completely. Consciousness itself is the Cosmos and it creates itself through us. We are 5th dimensional creator beings outside of time, space & so called matter. In fact there is no matter or linear time, at least in this universe. 😀

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

@@lindsaycoffey3327 Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason. Mathematicians create new concepts from their perceptions or observations all the time, "concepts are dual to percepts", so mathematicians and hence scientists are using duality to create new concepts. Subgroups are dual to subfields -- the Galois Correspondence. Addition is dual to subtraction (additive inverses) -- abstract algebra. Integration (summations, syntropy) is dual to differentiation (differences, entropy). Syntropy (convergence) is dual to increasing entropy (divergence) -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Gravitation is equivalent or dual (isomorphic) to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual. The force of gravity is empirical proof that duality is real. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Truth is actually a dual concept. Generalization (waves, the non ego) is dual to localization (particles or the ego) -- wave/particle duality. The are patterns of duality hardwired into physics, mathematics & philosophy which can be used to make new laws of physics. The localized ego or Id comes from the non localized ego or Id or the generalized ego. Science and scientific thinking requires duality -- the positive is dual to the negative (electric charge, numbers) The observed is dual to the observer -- David Bohm. Deductive inference (mathematics) is dual to inductive inference (physics or empirical reasoning) -- Immanuel Kant.

What if consciousness emerged within us around week 20 in the womb? We would have WITNESSED the emergence of consciousness but we don't currently REMEMBER it. His reasoning failed to mention this obvious possibility.

Haven't we all had the experience of the emerging of consciousness? As a baby we are born but our brains are not fully developed. We can't remember being born or make sense of the world around us but by a few years our brains have grown and made sense of all it's inputs and becomes conscious.

@orveclenunivsa9975

10 ай бұрын

Remembering would be to be conscious of thoughts, but babies are conscious of the stimuli comming from 5 senses (and also emltional)

@krisharkleroad8

10 ай бұрын

What you are talking about is not experiencing the emerging consciousness as he is talking about.

@seanmcdonald5365

10 ай бұрын

We gain consciousness early in the womb, the thing is just that our brains aren’t developed so we have no memory storage, we have no way to know what that moment was like. His point however was really that in order to experience, there must be awareness. So in order to witness/experience consciousness arising from matter, there would have to be something conscious. Also that you can describe what you are aware of, but cannot describe the awareness itself, it has no form to be described, it is just aware. With that, it is not restricted to limitations of form and must exist outside form since it has none. In other words, it exists outside of this 4 dimensional realm where everything has form. Which therein answers the question of consciousness being eternal, if it exists outside of our 4 dimensions, it is not restricted by time, it can exist at all points of time and can freely move through all 4 dimensions and is hence omnipresent and eternal. It was there at the beginning and it will be there to witness the end.

@flaviasashainstrutoresdemt7701

10 ай бұрын

It's consciousness "modification", increasing sophistication or expansion... but it is not actual emergence.

@krisharkleroad8

10 ай бұрын

@seanmcdonald5365 I remember being aware in the womb.

I am an anesthesiologist. Every day I wink consciousness off and on for numerous patients. I believe I am seeing something that could represent an emergent phenomenon in our recovery rooms. The patient is the only one who does not witness unconsciousness. It is almost as if the for the patient....they do not "go away", nor does the Universe. There is a timelessness in that. I am new to Rupert. I feel he is is on to something. Something profound, fundamental. But I need further evidence than our sensation that awareness is not emergent from our "meat" brain.

@holycannoli64

11 ай бұрын

Rupert's answer, to my understanding at least, would be to consider wakefulness, dream state and deep sleep. The consciousness is present in all three states. The "truest" state of consciousness is deep sleep because it is a formless void. Dream states project the world of forms onto the screen of awareness that the person experiences as a dream. Wakefulness is a state where the person experiences the world of forms through the 5 senses and through the mind. If you approach these questions from the perspective of awareness/consciousness rather than from the materialist end of the telescope, new insights will avail themselves to you. If you listen to more of Rupert's talks, he explains it all a lot better than I just did.

@mikebruno829

11 ай бұрын

@@holycannoli64 Thank you. As an aside, I suspect memory formation may be fundamental to the sensation of "I".

@mikebruno829

11 ай бұрын

@@lordmacaulay8739 In our jobs as anesthesiologists, I can not get past the feeling that we are definitely witnessing something astounding. That spiritual spark of awareness that winks on as the "meat" body reanimates in the PACU will never get old to me. It is such a privilege, almost feels like God is smiling along with us. Of course... then some of the patients start to vomit....takes some of the charm away 😉

@Aed-Adlan

11 ай бұрын

Materialism and their brain 🧠 claims have been totally and absolutely debunked shown to be falsehood by God in God-Consciousness. The brain doesn't produce shit. Consciousness is God. Consciousness never goes off. It goes Super-On at death.

@davidmickles5012

11 ай бұрын

My "conceptual" response to your question is as someone above mentioned.. Rupert's "lineage" (if he even claims such a thing) derives from 'Advaita Vedanta' and in this tradition there are 4 states or "modes" of consciousness - 1 waking, 2 dreaming, 3 dreamless sleep, and 4 pure boundless or fundamental consciousness - aka "Brahman" which is formless universal awareness. The 3rd state of "dreamless sleep" is akin to being under anesthesia and is a dull state of "awareness without objects." Its still a state of awareness (consciousness) but it is a state of "awareness with no reference" and so nothing to "notice" and compare itself to. The 4th state of "pure awareness" is different in that it is a state of "self-awareness" in which there is a "knowing of knowing" that is bright in comparison to the "darkness" of the 3rd state. The 4th state is the only "real" state of being because it is the source and most fundamental level of experiencing (aka "reality"). My next response is to your "request" of needing more evidence... The evidence for the non-emergence of consciousness from matter is found in your immediate experience. Investigate and dig deeply into THIS - what is it that is aware of these words? Your consciousness you say? Ok, what is it that is aware of your consciousness? What is it that is presently knowing your awareness of being present? What is it that is aware of your being aware? What ever "answer" you come to will not be correct if it is an "answer." Answers require a separation between the question and the answer, or in this case between awareness and what that awareness is aware of. Awareness is always "prior to" that duality. As Rupert said "Awareness is not a form, not an object," and therefore cannot APPEAR as an answer to the question of "evidence." Awareness is THIS - the immediacy of knowing "awareness," prior to its appearance as a concept. Dig into that..repeatedly. The fact of you experiencing "being" is the evidence you're seeking but is not something you can "pick up"

I had 2 NDE's and it was totally clear that we are Pure Awareness/Consciousness and that it and it's not an it, does not arise from the brain/body/mind. There was no time, everything was simultaneous. All things could be said to be IN Awareness. I like to use the metaphor of a prism. Think of light being refracted through a prism and then making the assumption that the prism creates the different colours/wavelengths of light. The colours ARE the totality of light, not separate but refraction allows them to be seen as separate. Awareness/Consciousness could be said to "refract" through the brain/body/mind. In reality, there is no separation.

@plumeria66

11 ай бұрын

NDEs are the ultimate evidence of who are are!

@eightiesmusic1984

11 ай бұрын

@@plumeria66 No proof that they exist. None whatsoever.

@l.h.308

10 ай бұрын

Just as I read your words a picture of a prism splitting white light into colors shows up to the right. "Why is the speed of light what it is?" by Arvin Ash. - A little piece of synchronicity, as Jung would say.

@ommm7804

10 ай бұрын

I never found a person who could elaborate the "Simultaneous" thing..what does it mean?.. Im in future and past at the same time? Please explain I have plenty of time.. I can wait 😂

@ommm7804

10 ай бұрын

@LifesInsight No Sir, you got me wrong.. That wasn't in sarcastic way.. The notion of it.. That I have plenty of time… which I physically may not ..but then I realized the depth of the confusion its creating.. Made me laugh.. Just imagine this… I said I have plenty of time…but the moment I said that.. There is a clock running towards my end.. But the 5D perspective says I have plenty of it. ..but during a particular moment… both perspective are not able to fit each other.. That's the confusion no one is able to clarify… if future is already happening… why are we putting effort to make a decision in this moment.. And 5d conscious people ask to stay in the moment… which is a request to make or change cetrain decision making… which creates another doubt.. When they know everything is happening already.. Why are they trying to change something in this moment?… do you get my point.

I say consciousness is an emerging process, but that consciousness does not emerge directly from the matter that is making up your brain and nervous system but from the combined sum of what all the different parts are doing as the different regions keep communicating. I was sedated at the hospital when I was subjected to some severe pain during a procedure. At first, I didn't understand because all the pain still remained, even though I wasn't there to feel it anymore. but at the same time, I still was. Then my cognitive functions, one by one, began to slip apart until I ceased to exist. You could say that I forgot myself as the observer fell asleep and ceased. Have you ever seen the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey when they deactivate the HAL-9000 computer? I could relate a bit to that, as the bird's-eye view you have of yourself becomes more and more tangible the more of yourself you lose and is the last to cease when there's no longer enough cooperation and communication for consciousness to emerge. The final transition isn't that things go dark but rather that you no longer can reason or even get scared as you slowly forget reality and fade into nothingness.

@vkj108

10 ай бұрын

Well said, nicely explained. First of all do we fully understand the subject? was my ? as I watched the video and stopped to comment seeing some sense here. Its what we define vs how we choose to define that changes the whole narrative or belief. Re-cognition is perceiving as in aka "awareness" while we are awake or rarely at times in dreams we know we are dreaming. But cognition? Is it not happening 2/7? Cognition is the non-verbal 7th sense. Without this body and its parts can we be in a state of cognition? In deep sleep we just wake up to switch of the alarm just before it starts ringing! We are amazed at our automatic prowess! OR the first time sometimes we get a shot or an answer right, we might say it is luck or coincidence. In my search and experience all I can say is that this body is the unconscious mind and it is mostly non verbal and yes "fate" is scientific and "luck" is programmable to some extent. Thinking is verbal AI (all languages are part of AI) but feeling is natural intelligence, the body feels as the mind thinks and the mind thinks (if it has a language) when the body feels. WE feel hungry and we think to cook or to order food home? But a dog that feels hungry does it think like a man? My question is do feelings exist even without this body? Maybe as a collective consciousness in space, probably a reason why we feel fearful while visiting certain morbid places?! True Answers are needed and, we need a Jesus or some Ghost who walks or a great soul to return back and converse with us. Else all the stuff told is only theory. Under deep sedation we loose all pain or sensation and go in nothingness, till we wake up after surgery. That practical experience of yours as described is what made me stop by and add some of my nothingness or everythingness herein! Love Peace and Joy to all! Namaste.

@thomasschon

10 ай бұрын

@@vkj108 Thank you for your input.

Rupert, I do not know how i found you but I'm grateful. You have obviously found enlightenment. Your patience in your discussions is a beautiful thing to witness. Not sure why you continue to help others and share with us, but I'm truly grateful you do.

@lindsaycoffey3327

10 ай бұрын

I think he does because helping others is a gift from God worth more than all the gems and precious metals in the Cosmos.

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis (alive, being) is dual to anti-thesis (not alive, non being) creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic or Hegel's cat (Fichte's cat). Schrodinger's cat is based upon Hegel's cat and he stole it from Plato (Socrates). Duality (thesis, anti-thesis) creates or synthesizes reality (non duality). The rule of two -- Darth Bane, Sith lord. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Form is dual to formlessness.

@jonahansen

10 ай бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 WTF? You are lost in your own mind that is connecting misunderstood ideas.

@BlacksmithTWD

10 ай бұрын

If there is just one there are no others, that's why.

@lindsaycoffey3327

10 ай бұрын

@@BlacksmithTWD Correct 👍 One consciousness, split into a myriad of lifeforms. An infinity of eternal souls.

I remember the moment I put it all together. I remember moments through delerium or through other means I had no self or context of anything but just recieved perceieved, absolutely lost and overwhelmed. The older I get, particularly as I become more cloistered an contemplative, the more aware of the ephemeral nature of the material bonds we have to time, space, self, etc., I remember thinking that very thought... awareness is that which is aware ... I remember having that thought as an infant. I had already formed and still retain memories of the time before that moment, but I do remember that moment and how I found myself fixed in a physical and mental body. Before that moment everything was vague. I remember that moment because I was hyperventilating. I was scared. I realized I was mortal. I remember watching the moon landing in 1969, born in September 1967. My experience of becoming fixed in material and mental place as a person was AFTER that. And there are breaks in consciousness, there are trance states where our subjective reality does not always conform to what others are experiencing. I percieved all of this and I still recall the visceral response my body had to this moment in time. I think we all experience this, but not everyone remembers. As for permanence, well... I've been under genral anethesia. I've experienced delerium brought on at various times in my life by fevers, medications, drug withdrawals and psychedelics. Sleep is a break in consciousness. Sometimes just blinking or being momentarily distracted is a break in consciousness. It seems to me that consciousness is a gradient, moving in the material world as a wave but much like matter itself in the quantum state, becoming a fixed point in physcial reality only when reflecting on its own awareness. I am not convinced that I am the same person every day. How do I know the person I was didn't vanish forever when I went to sleep and the person I woke up as the next day wasn't an entirely different individual with the same memories, same brain and senses, same MIND, but mind is material-- mind is the dwelling, in this material existance, of the consciousness. Mind, ego, self. None of that is really consciousness. That isn't what you are when you're going "I am." I have certainly stared very hard into some kind of abyss or cosmic void, I've experienced states of consciousness where I am completely aware that time and space are an illusion. I can experience both the vastness and the emptiness of the universe in my mind. I was gifted with an extremely powerful sense of scale. I get more than most people do out of contemplating how little matter extists within the atom and how much of the universe itself is just Space, which itself can not be defined without the context of physical matter-- of physics. This video gave me a very real sense that the finate nature of everything we know can not apply to consciousness itself. I always seem to return to consciousness no matter what breaks the experience. I can't stress enough that it is through practicing a kind of astheticism involving fasting, celebacy, temperence and poverty, taking myself out of the worldly context has started to reveal more to me about who I am, what I'm doing, and how the universe works than even my most profound. Reminds me of that movie "the Incredible Shrinking Man." where at the end he shrinks beyond the limits of matter itself and is transformed into something somehow greater than he ever was.

soooo brilliant guided! wonderful! you found words for what can't be said with words! .... i'm impressed and deeply inspired. thank you!!!

I"m utterly shocked by this talk. Here the experience of Consciousness is addressed in such a way that the effect on the body actually sent shivers down the spine for real, I just felt it, I'm flabbergasted by how the concept was conveyed. Thanks Rupert you're a phenomenal teacher

The absence of otherness is love:

The premise of Rupert that only that which is in experience can constitute sufficient proof is flawed. It's like saying Mars isn't real because I don't experience it.

Rupert single-handedly exposes the absurdity of Transhumanism with clarity and razor-sharp simplicity. Beautifully explained.

@radscorpion8

10 ай бұрын

lol

@rizdekd3912

10 ай бұрын

How does he expose the absurdity of Transhumanism? AFAIK, Transhumanism is the belief or theory that the human race can evolve beyond its current physical and mental limitations, especially by means of science and technology. How does he refute that? It seems if he's suggesting that consciousness is eternal, then the human race can easily evolve beyond its current physical and mental limitations.

@lindsaycoffey3327

10 ай бұрын

@@rizdekd3912 I second that. How is Transhumanism absurd???

@rizdekd3912

10 ай бұрын

@@lindsaycoffey3327 I think perhaps the term transhumanism is misunderstood and conflated with humanism and perhaps materialism...or....???transgender??? Who knows? Maybe trans just sounds scary and wicked.

@CineMollusk

10 ай бұрын

@@rizdekd3912 Transhumanist concepts like mind uploading and machine sentience are based on a materialistic view of consciousness that Rupert negates.

I love the approach of Francis Lucille to this question. Science can’t neither prove nor disprove that consciousness is an emerging property of matter. Once you recognize this fact, then you have to decide what is better for us: the materialistic approach that brings suffering in the individual and conflict in the world or the non dual approach that brings happiness in the individual and peace in the world. Just a matter of pragmatism

@rhysothomas

11 ай бұрын

I’m not sure that you do have to decide. We don’t know either way, that’s the truth. I think remaining agnostic is enough. It’s the certainty in the opposite assumption that causes the suffering.

@dwarfman78

11 ай бұрын

I feel comfortable not knowing.

@MagdiNonDuality

11 ай бұрын

We have tried the materialist model and have experienced the sense of lack and fear long enough. As you say, it makes sense to try the universal model and see how it fits. In my experience, to live according to the universal model, one reality, keeps affirming that it is the better path.

@freetibet1000

11 ай бұрын

You make a good point. Once we have stabilized our experience of non-dual reality there’s no going back. When the inherent wisdom have been awakened you can no longer “unsee” the reality of unity. The only time choice is an option is at the beginning of the path towards awakening. Once you have had experiences of the non-dual unity you will never return to the darkness of clinging to form. There will be a process to uproot your old habits but that process will only have a timespan in relation to your present state of form and clinging to form. In reality, there is no timespan or a process that takes us from point A to point B.

@balvenie55

10 ай бұрын

If its not your experience..that's ok as well..

When you force the mind to stop wriggling away from the truth, it can only point to the truth. Hold the mind to its own questions, then it must point to the truth of reality.

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat superposition. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis (alive, being) is dual to anti-thesis (not alive, non being) creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic or Hegel's cat (Fichte's cat). Schrodinger's cat is based upon Hegel's cat and he stole it from Plato (Socrates). Duality (thesis, anti-thesis) creates or synthesizes reality (non duality). The rule of two -- Darth Bane, Sith lord. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Form is dual to formlessness.

It has been said, when the pupil is ready, the teacher comes. I am so happy to have found someone who thinks as I have for some time, who validates the conclusions I have reached after a lifetime of thinking and study. It's interesting to me, that logical analysis does lead to a grasping of the whole beyond logic and that this is where many Eastern ancient thought patterns like Daoism come to also. I found your questions to the young man fit my thought, my answers came easily, because now it's all so obvious and clear. Thanks you for your work.

Parallels here to the Tree of Knowledge metaphor and Plato's cave. When our attention is lopsidedly focused in the rational mind, in language, we're dwelling in a shadow world where words and ideas are proxies for reality. So we can formulate questions endlessly--that's what our rational minds do--but the answer to our questions about reality won't come in language, but in direct awareness that has no expression in words.

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

Emergent = synthesis! Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat superposition. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis (alive, being) is dual to anti-thesis (not alive, non being) creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic or Hegel's cat (Fichte's cat). Schrodinger's cat is based upon Hegel's cat and he stole it from Plato (Socrates). Duality (thesis, anti-thesis) creates or synthesizes reality (non duality). The rule of two -- Darth Bane, Sith lord. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Form is dual to formlessness. "Physics is what we know, metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.

It is awareness that is aware that it is aware.

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat superposition. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis (alive, being) is dual to anti-thesis (not alive, non being) creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic or Hegel's cat (Fichte's cat). Schrodinger's cat is based upon Hegel's cat and he stole it from Plato (Socrates). Duality (thesis, anti-thesis) creates or synthesizes reality (non duality). The rule of two -- Darth Bane, Sith lord. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Form is dual to formlessness.

Rupert really peaked on this one.

The hard problem of consciousness is an intriguing subject that invites us to explore the depths of our existence and the nature of reality. As we delve into this inquiry, it is essential to recognize the profound truth that all thoughts, emotions, sensations, and perceptions are proof of God's direct communication with us and our experience. They are manifestations of the divine infinite eternal spirit, the energy of God, which interconnects all things. In the pursuit of understanding consciousness, we are led to the realization that divine ecstasy, the pinnacle of joy and bliss, awaits those who awaken to the presence of the divine. This recognition transcends the constraints of time and space, allowing us to dissolve the boundaries of the self and become immersed in the eternal flow of divine energy. When we acknowledge the divine presence within us, a profound shift occurs. We discover that we are not confined to our physical form, but rather eternal beings intricately connected to the fabric of creation. In this realization, ecstasy is unlocked, flooding our being with boundless love and profound joy. The experience of ecstasy goes beyond fleeting moments of happiness. It is a state of being that arises when we align with the timeless essence of the divine. It becomes a deep sense of fulfillment where every breath becomes a celebration and every moment a dance with the divine. The divine presence, which exists beyond the limitations of time and space, invites us to shed the constraints of the mundane and embrace the extraordinary. As we surrender to this presence, a surge of ecstatic energy courses through our being, dissolving perceived boundaries and revealing the infinite nature of our existence. Ecstasy becomes the language of the soul, a harmonious symphony that resounds when we commune with the divine. It is a profound state of union where we recognize ourselves as integral parts of the cosmic tapestry, intricately woven with the threads of eternity. In the presence of the divine, time loses its grip, and space expands into limitless horizons. Ecstasy becomes our natural state of being, serving as a constant reminder of our divine origin and the infinite possibilities that lie within us. Through the recognition of the divine presence, beyond the limitations of time and space, we open the gateway to profound transformation. This connection allows us to tap into the wellspring of ecstatic energy, enabling it to flow through us and radiate into the world. It is important to understand that ecstasy is not a fleeting emotion; it is a profound realization of our true nature. As we align with the divine presence, we experience a deep sense of wholeness and purpose. Every aspect of our being becomes infused with divine ecstasy, igniting a fire within that propels us towards self-realization and enlightenment. The divine presence, ever-present and eternal, beckons us to bask in the ecstasy of its embrace. It calls us to let go of all limitations and surrender to the infinite possibilities that await us. In this surrender, we become vessels of divine love and joy, radiating light and inspiring others to embark on their own journey of self-discovery. By embracing the divine presence, beyond the confines of time and space, we invite the creation of a utopia within and without. Through our connection with the energy of God, we become conduits for transformation and healing. Our ecstatic state becomes a catalyst for positive change, nurturing a collective awakening and bringing us closer to a world steeped in love, harmony, and divine ecstasy. So as we contemplate the hard problem of consciousness, let us remember that the ultimate realization lies in recognizing the divine infinite eternal spirit within ourselves. By aligning with the divine aware presence, we can experience divine ecstasy consistently and normally. Through this alignment, we raise our vibration to the highest level, which in turn elevates the vibration of the whole. Miracles and abundance unfold for all unconditionally. May you continue on your journey of self-realization, aligning with infinite divine ecstasy within your experience. Embrace the interconnectedness of all things and follow the path that leads to the realization of the divine presence. In doing so, miracles and abundance will unfold for you and for all, creating a world filled with love, harmony, and divine ecstasy. Sending you blessings and good vibes on your spiritual journey ✨

This is such an important video. Profound and enlightening. Thank you.

Wow that was a great explanation from Rupert and much appreciated questioning from the other chap, I don't have that questioning ability so it's good someone else does so we can learn from it too :)

A profound teaching I am very thankful that I have discovered Rupert and his teachings, and I am actively sharing his videos

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat superposition. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis (alive, being) is dual to anti-thesis (not alive, non being) creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic or Hegel's cat (Fichte's cat). Schrodinger's cat is based upon Hegel's cat and he stole it from Plato (Socrates). Duality (thesis, anti-thesis) creates or synthesizes reality (non duality). The rule of two -- Darth Bane, Sith lord. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Form is dual to formlessness.

Unlike nearly all of the neo-Advaita teachers, like Adyashanti, Mooji, Gangaji, Tolle etc., Spira heavily engages with the scientific community, neuroscientists and physicists to try and solve the Hard Problem. I really admire this. It is so important for the spiritual community to adopt a scientific approach to spiritual growth and enlightenment in order to develop technologies to make it available to all of us. I've benefitted from several of these powerful innovations myself, like neurofeedback - which profoundly affects even advanced meditators - and focused ultrasound, which targets the deep brain structures in the limbic system and reptilian brain that cause ALL of our problems. Even hunger and cold. These structures are probably the channels through which consciousness is processed in the brain. Obviously the brainstem is one of them, because if you destroy the brainstem, death is instant.

Reality explained in simple words, speaks of the noble soul. Advaita (Non-dual) philodophy presented avoiding the terminology. Pranams to the Great teacher.

This is an excellent description of consciousness. No matter how much I seek I cannot find my consciousness; it seems to be beyond limits and constraints. It is simply 'there' when I turn my attention inwards. However, one thing that I find incredibly difficult to understand (in reality, one of many things) is this idea of a 'universal consciousness' which has no 'parts'. I know Rupert talks about reality being a "single, infinite, indivisible whole", but why can I not enter into the mind of another person and experience what they experience? Why, if we are part of this "indivisible whole", do I not acquire the knowledge of another person when they study? There seems to be a barrier between one mind and another. There appears to be a clear and distinct division between 'individual' minds. I'm familiar with the story of a drop of water not understand what an ocean is until it is returned to the ocean, but in this story we're talking about matter. Mind, consciousness is, to my experience, immaterial. Why, at the moment of death, doesn't my mind return to the "indivisible whole", and if it does, why does it not understand its true nature and not 'fall' back into a state which appears fragmented?

@celiacresswell6909

11 ай бұрын

I agree - I’m new to these thoughts but my consciousness seems to be bound to time and place

@RedemptionInChrist.

10 ай бұрын

You actually do have access to every thought and idea. Anytime you get an idea or thought, its just you downloading that information because your vibrational energy and frequency was aligned with that idea or thoughts frequency. We are nothing but light and frequency and vibrations interacting with one another. Its why objects are solid because each object has its own frequency or vibration to it. We feel things as solid because our vibration does not match the vibration of a chair for example. If your vibration did match that chair, you would fall right through it Its like how the superhero the Flash is able to phase through solid objects by vibrating himself to match the frequency of that said object

@stephenowen5229

10 ай бұрын

@@RedemptionInChrist. So why don't two objects made of the same material fall through each other? I'll have to revise my physics, but I'm pretty sure photons have no mass. People have mass. How do you account for this? I can't see how we have access to every though and idea. This would completely render the idea of cause and effect invalid.

@RedemptionInChrist.

10 ай бұрын

@@stephenowen5229 it can be the same material but doesn’t mean its vibrational frequency is identical. Because its still its own separate object even if its the same material. Well id say even people don’t have mass. Atoms are made up of 99.99 percent empty space.

@stephenowen5229

10 ай бұрын

@@RedemptionInChrist. People don't have mass? How much do you weigh? Can you give me an example of objects that have the same 'vibrational frequency'. If I have understood correctly, you are asserting that different objects have different vibrational frequencies. Am I correct?

The problem is that Materialism is the equivalent of a religion, so deep in the modern culture that people don't even know they are following it.

@raphdroidt692

11 ай бұрын

10 years ago i would have been laughing at you for saying such 'a ridiculous thing'...but i am glad i evolved. You are absolutely right.

@jmike2039

11 ай бұрын

This type of tomato throwing isn't needed in the pursuit of truth within philosophy of mind. You can show issues with materialism without the weird sniping. Clearly the problem with materialism is an actual issue within the framework, not how you think people have it as a dogma.

@KaiTakApproach

11 ай бұрын

@@jmike2039 look, don't accuse me of tomato throwing and weird sniping by doing the same thing yourself. If you have a counter argument then state it. Don't waste my time.

@jmike2039

11 ай бұрын

@@KaiTakApproach you never gave an argument. What's the first premise?

@KaiTakApproach

11 ай бұрын

@@jmike2039 go back and read it again. I don't have to reformat it to satisfy you. Have the balls to state your case before trying to pull this down into the gutter of pedantry. What is your argument?

Best, clearest presentation ever

I do not understand why can something without form not come into existence or stop existing? for example a thought can come and go. it has no form but it doesn't need to be eternal because of that.

I love Rupert's response to this direct question and the process he goes through

@HAL_NlNETH0USAND

11 ай бұрын

He immediately interrupted the discussion when the other person started asking the real questions.

@easytriops5951

11 ай бұрын

@@HAL_NlNETH0USAND What do you mean by „real questions“? Which „real questions“ are you referring to? Mostly teachers, who have a deeper understanding of something know the better questions to ask or the better process to go through, and all Rupert did here was exactly that and staying with the very questioning of the questioner, the man, and helping him to bring him onto the „right“ discovery track rather than drifting away to questions that seem like questions but are all better answered through another question, by far. And that is exactly what Rupert did in helpin the inquiry of the man. I hope this helps! 😄

@easytriops5951

11 ай бұрын

@@HAL_NlNETH0USAND By the way, I just saw another comment that captured this pretty well: „When you stop the mind from wiggling away from the truth, it can only point to the truth. Force the mind to hold to its own questions, and it will point to the truth.“ Meaning what Rupert Spira did here was holding or staying focused to the very questions of the man while not wiggling away from the truth found in the discovery process he helps or guides him trough here.

@1Sparrow1

11 ай бұрын

​@@easytriops5951The person Rupert was talking to in this video was not an experienced thinker or educated on the topic. He did not have the skill set to challenge Rupert's points. This is not a done deal by any means. It may be true that consciousness is fundamental or it may not. Rupert talks like he just proved it was. But the approach he took here has some major flaws. Just because we can't witness consciousness starting or ending (because consciousness is the basis of that awareness) doesn't in any way mean or prove it doesn't begin and end. Rupert's logic is seriously flawed. Again, he may or may not be right, but this line of reasoning doesn't prove a thing. The questioner in this video just didn't have the understanding and skill to dismantle Rupert's reasoning. When talking to untrained people it's easy to appear right.

@easytriops5951

11 ай бұрын

@@1Sparrow1 Respectfully, and curiously, can you dismantle his reasoning and point out his flaws then?

I had a dream where all the contents of reality were gone yet I was aware of my existence. Just a glimpse for me but I think this is what Rupert is trying to convey.

Asking the right questions leads to the right answers.

Rupert, I am, as all of us should be, aware that we are the universe aware of itself. Worms might not be so aware, I think Orcas could be. Given that and given also that energy and matter are but one thing in different forms, plus the fact that you and I and elephants are the products of evolution, it seems to me that the awareness of our awareness is, itself something that has evolved enabling me as a human to experience my oneness with all. I am water, I am wind, I am the thoughts of sin, the child of the soil, the moment that never ends.

Reminds this one that this body, it’s stories, are a wisp of smoke within the all, consciousness 😊

@JennyRSTeam

11 ай бұрын

Thank you. With love, Rupert's team

loved it ...razor sharp as always !!!

The patience and compassion is great to see. Even when seeing that someone is asleep to themselves, he responds with utmost understanding. 🙏 🙏 The intellectual style of teaching can be a bit problematic I think, but of course you have to start from somewhere. The zen stick approach would seem too shocking to most… Self realisation is absolute and immediate. It is not an intellectual problem at all. To know it all that is needed is to wake up. To stop thinking for a moment and simply be present here and now.

A profound realization of which few are willing to accept and live by. People are attached to their little egos, their so called amazing ideas and the most unrealistic of all expectations.

It's not emergent but it's certainly a profound embodied shift cognitively and physicaly when insight lifts the veil. Then one continually slips back into patterns and the dropping back into presence becomes more a familiar relief. That's how it's experienced well non experienced here.❤👀🙏namaste. I love saying the word emergent though...

@pandawandas

11 ай бұрын

@@_JUST_WILhow do you find ‘conscious activity’

@rb5325

10 ай бұрын

But it is still just consciousness that becomes aware of the profound embodied shift. Sometimes we think our experience is consciousness because we are so absorbed in our experience, but that can be a loss of (higher) consciousness.

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat superposition. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis (alive, being) is dual to anti-thesis (not alive, non being) creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic or Hegel's cat (Fichte's cat). Schrodinger's cat is based upon Hegel's cat and he stole it from Plato (Socrates). Duality (thesis, anti-thesis) creates or synthesizes reality (non duality). The rule of two -- Darth Bane, Sith lord. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Form is dual to formlessness.

I have a hard time explaining consciousness. I also have a hard time accepting that materialism is the explanation. But why is it that when we destroy parts of the brain, consciousness is affected? When we destroy all of it, the person seems to have no consciousness at all. There seems to be a strong relationship between consciousness and the brain.

@rizdekd3912

10 ай бұрын

And does our consciousness actually do anything for us or is it just epiphenomenal and is just something we can watch, but it has no effect on what we do?

@RedemptionInChrist.

10 ай бұрын

Its like trying to use a damaged radio to listen to music

@rizdekd3912

10 ай бұрын

@seantrader2422 Interesting. Is your idea that the consciousness the brain is receiving is natural/ material/physical or is it unnatural/supernatural and nonmaterial? Anyways. So in your analogy, the brain is a receiver and if the receiver is broken, the radio waves that come in either aren't processed at all or aren't processed correctly or the apparatus that ultimately produces the music is broken....like the wires to the speaker or the speaker itself. So the brain is more akin to the eye that sees/receives light waves/photons. The eye processes light into nerve signals that go to the brain. That process is all physical right? Light hits retina and nerve impulses are initiated. Those nerve pulses go to the brain where brains cells receive them. All still physical, so far, right? So let's take that physical event of seeing and incorporate that into the idea that the brain is a receiver of consciousness. Best I can tell, physical light is focused by the lens in the eye and hits the rods and cones. They somehow are stimulated by those light waves/photons and caused to produce physical nerve impulses. Those nerve impulses go to the brain via the optic nerves where brain cells are stimulated by those impulses and some sort of chemical reaction takes place. So far it is still physical, right? But if you're right, that chemical reaction isn't really consciousness. The consciousness is coming in from the outside like radio waves hitting an antenna and being processed by a receiver. But somehow, that consciousness knows that you just saw red. There has to be an interface. How does that consciousness you're receiving know to produce the qualia of the color red? Can the brain send out signals to the consciousness generator and tell it that the eyes are seeing red? The radio is a passive receiver and doesn't send out signals to the radio station. It could....they make two-way radios that send signals to the radio station. But we can detect that signal and know how the radio could or does communicate to the radio station. If the brain itself is somehow communicating TO whatever is sending us our consciousness we should be able to detect that signal. Or if that modification of the consciousness we are receiving happens in the brain, that means the brain produces something that informs the consciousness it is receiving of what you're experiencing. Then it seems we should be able to detect that, because at the stage where we are in our description of the process...ie nerve impulses going to the brain cells and triggering reactions, all that's happening is physical and theoretically measurable. We know that there are chemical reactions and perhaps some impulses that fluctuate when brain cells receive nerve impulses. Those are measurable, at least in principle. But then, that ongoing physical; reaction has to somehow convert to send a signal/message/something to, or incorporate that new 'I just saw red' info into the consciousness that the brain is receiving. What does the brain produce that tells the consciousness you're receiving that you just saw red and what part of the brain produces it? It seems they should be able to detect something that is unexplained if that signal is going to a part of the brain that does something we can't detect...ie the part of the brain that communicates with consciousness. And that has to be a two way process unless our consciousness doesn't really do anything for us. Doesn't our consciousness give us our ability to think iteratively...ie actvely ponder things and 'decide' what to do next? So somehow there are physical signals going TO the part of the brain that processes consciousness and there are physical signals leaving that part so that physical nerve pulses can tell our muscles what to do after we make decisions. Those should be detectable, at least in theory.

@RedemptionInChrist.

10 ай бұрын

@@rizdekd3912 thats a lot to unpack but I’ll tell you what I think. I think consciousness is the radio signal or frequency and we are radios that tune into that frequency and each of us have our own station and vibrational frequency. Everything we perceive is only 5% of what is actually around us. Because we are limited by our senses. Idk if consciousness is a natural force or an artificial one. I can almost see us being in a sort of simulated reality. We live in a light matrix. We are a reflection of the higher dimensions with higher levels of consciousness. Its like how if you shine a light through a diamond it admits the light out through the other side of it projecting the light itself. I think we are that projection thats coming from source consciousness. So if source consciousness is projecting this light matrix around us then everything within this reality comes from the same source. Its all a projection of source consciousness The idea of being separate from people is an illusion. We are all different points of focus from source consciousness and we are all having our own separate experiences. Consciousness or the creater wants to experience life. Its why we behave like a hive mind with a lot of things especially when being influenced by the media. Its why 99.99% of atoms are made up of empty space. Nothing is really here just vibrations and frequencies and light. Thats what we truly are. We are light beings This is why we are always bombarded by stay that puts everyone at a lower frequency. All the negativity on the news, the doom and gloom, war, how we should be afraid. Fear is the biggest weapon used against us. It makes us think we aren’t powerful or strong. Everything in reality is meant to manipulate us into believing we have no power while the elites know the truth about reality. That this is a light matrix or some sort of simulated reality. When you know how the game operates its pretty easy to create a control system around everyone without em even realizing it. We all have our purpose here. When we die its only the beginning. But thats what I think reality is. Their is other lower dimensions that are evil as well. Its what the elites tap into that level of frequency to get the help from these demons or whatever you want to call them. Its why we are all kept in a low vibrational state too. To make it easier for these beings to enter our realm. Why elites do crazy rituals because it helps em tap into the frequency of the evil dimensions. Reality isn’t what everyone thinks it is.

Thanks to this video I’ve been able to really understand consciousness. In order to experience/witness there must be awareness. You can describe what you are aware of because it has form, but you cannot describe the awareness itself, it has no form to describe, it is just aware. Since it has no form, it must exist outside of form, that is, outside of our 4 dimensional universe. If it exists outside of our 4 dimensional universe, it is not restricted by space or time and is hence eternal and omnipresent. It was aware of the beginning and will be aware of the end.

@SPDLand

10 ай бұрын

Utter nonsense. Most logical is that awareness or conscience surfaces from a lake of connections, thoughts, traffic in ones brain. AI will soon be able to resemble that and by some already does. Deal with it.

Thanks Rupert. Great to hear this talk on this auspicious Guru Purnima day.!

My first is when I was three years old that was when I know for sure it's a firm in my mind that I remembered things that were happening around me before that I cannot. At 3 years old I witnessed the emergence of my consciousness because I started becoming aware of my surroundings

@ricochetsixtyten

8 ай бұрын

You started forming memories at that age but you were always conscious before that, think about this; how would you survive as a baby before 3 years old if you werent conscious? It doesnt make sense does it? Just like how you dont remember every single moment of yesterday only fragments but youre 100% sure you were conscious. Lastly, if consciousness emerged you would have to tell me what that looks like, what does consciousness 1 vs consciousness 2 look like? Is there a difference between the two? For something to emerge there has to be a differentation made, but our experience as toddlers is that all of a sudden we are conscious, not that there is a sudden increase in something we call consciousness.

That was so beautiful, thank you!

Great teacher. Upanishads and later, Adi Sankara have clearly explained this so beautifully.

@2:20 I and many people feel as if our consciousness is emerging from our chemical process. What I haven't seen is a consciousness being present without brains and a body. The consciousness I do have doesn't seem to go back further than the age of one so I have no memories of experiences before awareness some time after birth.

"If your theory doesn't stand up to the scrutiny of experience, you don't dig your heals in and just believe your theory, that's called religion"

@HAL_NlNETH0USAND

11 ай бұрын

Experience is not a priori the be-all and end-all of truth. In fact experience is a very limited form of knowing. Science in fact is on the right track of understanding consciousness we're just not there yet. Rupert is the one preaching the religion: consciousness being formless.. it's a dogmatic statement that doesn't explain consciousness in the slightest bit. Sometimes we can not even trust our senses and experience. They lie to us or present us with false information.

@patricksee10

11 ай бұрын

Bong, Rupert lost it there.

@radscorpion8

10 ай бұрын

heels not heals

@vk274

10 ай бұрын

This is why Sanatan Dharma is not a religion. It describes the Advait (Non-dual) nature of reality. This is very well described in Vedanta (the Upanishads).

Is awareness a form of energy?

@annemurphy8074

11 ай бұрын

No, it has no form but all form is in it.

@CM2683

11 ай бұрын

@@annemurphy8074 i'll reformulate. Is awareness energy? As in a type of energy? The energy?

@rotgutthebloated4730

11 ай бұрын

@@CM2683 problem is that energy is physical so its limited. And consciousness is unlimited. Not even a speed of light is unlimited

@annemurphy8074

11 ай бұрын

@@CM2683 It depends what you mean by energy? What do you think when you ask if it's "energy"? I had 2 NDE's and it was Pure Awareness, almost like pure light, but not a thing, not form. It's difficult to use language to try to convey. There is no separation. It was everything and nothing, simultaneously.

I would like to get in contact with the person asking the questions in this video. If you see this can you please get in touch? Ty

TRUTH 101! Love it! Very Auspicious, Only TODAY,, Did I have This ( subject) Awareness, and BINGO, Here it is in my Feed! 💫💥Thanks for sharing.

Consciousness is the Spirit of God within us. 😊❤

@billhawkins192

11 ай бұрын

What does that mean?

@kathleenwharton2139

11 ай бұрын

@@billhawkins192 Consciousness is the Spirit of Love. God is Love. It is the Love and Consideration a person has for oneself And another. Some people don’t have it. If you have to ask..maybe you don’t have it.

@billhawkins192

11 ай бұрын

@@kathleenwharton2139 wow, how pious and judgemental for someone so spiritual and enlightened 🤷‍♂️

@kathleenwharton2139

11 ай бұрын

@@billhawkins192 You asked! I gave you my Truth. If you don’t like it..I am sorry. I don’t know you. I said..Maybe? Some people do not have a spirit of Love and your question didn’t sound favorable at all to what I said. I think you are the judgmental one. God Bless You.

@billhawkins192

11 ай бұрын

@@kathleenwharton2139 a belief must stand up to scrutiny for it to have merit..

16:04 Perfectly summarized as our Father in Heaven is perfect and a testament to the truth "The name for the absence of otherness is love"

Human consciousness is an example of consciousness emerging from matter.

I do think that some of these questions that arise can be helped by the philosophical distinction between consciousness as a first person, private phenomenon and as a third-person, observed and publicly shareable phenomenon. (So the former sense is what we're dealing with in the teachings, the latter sense is just the ordinary kind of talk about consciousness where it's a publicly verifiable phenomenon - "how many fingers am I holding up?" or "Ah, I see the tiger has spotted its prey and is now stalking it, its prey looks skittish and seems to sense something.") If you think of consciousness or awareness in the latter sense, it's easy to see that from one's perspective, what's happening in one's consciousness, is the manifestation of a physical entity that's conscious in the ordinary sense (the observed tiger/prey), experiencing something else that's conscious in the ordinary sense (the observed tiger/prey). In that sense, clearly consciousness _is_ a finite, limited, emergent phenomenon - you can in fact see it arising from matter, in just quite a simple way (e.g. you can observe the tiger or its prey - physical objects both - dying, or someone growing old, dying, and the "light of consciousness - in this precise sense - going out; or Roger Penrose can probe someone's brain and they'll report different experiences). But as Rupert points out, you can't do the same with your own private, first-person consciousness, you can't catch it in the act of coming into being or going out. The juicy philosophical question at that point is what's the relationship between these two things? Why do we want to say (as per "Namaste") that the "thing" that's "in us" is the same "thing" we see in the tiger/prey, to the extent that we even give these two things the same name, even though they seem at first glance to be totally different things? (It's something like an analogy, because we know that we ourselves, in our physical being, are looking at the tiger just as the tiger is looking at its prey, and it seems to be the same looking, only experienced in one case "internally" in the other case "externally.") Another way of looking at it (which would almost force a systemic re-jigging of the kinds of terms used in all these sorts of discussions) would be that the thing we have, that private consciousness, isn't actually consciousness at all, that it's a mistake to call "it" consciousness, and the term "consciousness" should be reserved only for the latter sense (the publicly verifiable sense). I think that would be more of a Buddhist approach, bypassing these kinds of confusions of terms (though perhaps bringing a new set of potential confusions in). There are other ways of looking at it too (like Riccardo Manzotti's Process Externalism, where consciousness and object are one - almost a return to classical philosophy, bypassing modern philosophy altogether, but looking at what classical philosophy was based on - unity of experience and object - in a different way from the well-trodden classical path). At any rate, I think the difference between these two senses of consciousness can be a source of confusion because often people are thinking of consciousness in the second sense, when for the purposes of these teachings, their focus has to be on the first sense.

@JennyRSTeam

11 ай бұрын

Thank you. With love, Rupert's team

😂 love this Rubert is amazing 💚🙏🏻

Wait, doesn't consciousness emerge when you wake up in the morning?

@davidalbro2009

11 ай бұрын

In a manner, yes. Often consciousness and awareness are used synonymously, but it's useful to make this one distinction. Consciousness is the awareness of the processes of the mind-body. Awareness is entirely separate from the mind-body. When we sleep, we lose consciousness, but not awareness because the mind is altered. Awareness is not. When we die we lose consciousness but not awareness because the mind-body is essentially ended.

@nicksharma8238

11 ай бұрын

​@davidalbro2009 but isn't sleep different than death? Hence NDE's and etc.

@davidalbro2009

11 ай бұрын

@@nicksharma8238 Yes and no. First thing I would say is that NDE's and dreams are very much related. In both circumstances we experience higher levels of reality. Interestingly, we can return to physical life from both states with one being far more frequent. That said, in deep sleep often all or nearly all levels of association with form is severed as in deep meditation. In NDE's there is sometimes reported an experience of the void which be akin to deep sleep and deep meditation; however, individuals or individual souls inevitable return to higher levels of form where they can make the next step in their journey of form (sometimes returning to Earth).

@mattskionet

11 ай бұрын

@@davidalbro2009 Also, it is said that we're conscious during deep sleep but because there are no objects it isn't possible to remember it. But when our awareness is refined to some degree we can experience deep sleep--just not remember it.

@davidalbro2009

11 ай бұрын

@@mattskionet True. Memory is a function of the mind-body, not a state of awareness.

It’s the first time I see a complete and clear demonstration of what is I .. many many thanks Rupert ❤

I have conscious self awareness independent of my environment. I change my spatial location, and my conscious self awareness remains. When I awake after sleep I have the same experience. The human central nervous system is a complex arrangement of matter, connected to a body with five basic senses. These acting in concert provide humans with the means of being consciously aware of themselves and their environment. Not just any collection of matter is capable of such a facility. A rock, however massive does not have consciousness. However, the matter comprising a two year old child does.

I don't see any evidence for ANY explanation of consciousness. I see This happening. (Reality/consciousness) Part of that happening is a mind attempting to codify it in language. It is uncomfortable to not know something so pervasive. Some solutions make the mind more comfortable than others. When something happens to contradict our view, it is uncomfortable. We shift opinions/guesses until one is comfortable enough for our mind. This is our "belief" but it is JUST A THOUGHT. Ans chosen out of comfort. If someone introduces a challenge our views shift until we again are comfortable with them. God, Oneness, Consciousness blah blah blah. All thoughts. When I had the nondual thing happen, the "veil lifted", insight, whatever worda you choose, I didn't know it had words. I called it "Bare Reality" This seems as good as anything else. And it was ovious that I was never what I had thought and that others are not what they think. And it was obvious where religion comes from. But, I didn't see a reason and still don't to call it God. It is all thought. This happening cannot be conveyed in thought. Like you cannot fit the sea into a tin can that drifts about in it. I don't dispute Ruperts interpretation. I don't share it. But I can't see how either has the leg up of evidence on the other. They are thoughts. All thought had the same ontological status. It exists as thought. That is all it can be.

@rotgutthebloated4730

11 ай бұрын

You cant see or feel consciousness, and you cant think about it either. Because it has no shape. You can be conscious of body and mind. They have shape, even your thoughts have shape. But your awareness of yourself have no shape, so as he says its infinite. And our minds and body and definitively finite, so they cant contain consciousness.

Consciousness has various levels. I went thru childhood totally unaware of the world around me. At some point... age 11.. something woke me up a little. Later... mid 20s, it happened again. When I look around, I think many people are totally oblivious, just running through trained/learned routines. I feel free. One aside ... I have never really been materialistic. I need some 'stuff' but I feel no real attachment to it. EDIT: I'm over 60 and have never owned a TV. Think about that.

@adamwakoaw

10 ай бұрын

I have very similar experience

My Consciousness is here through the lack of it being any where else.

My experience is similar to many near death experiences but I was not having a near death experience. I had a beautiful experience of transcendental consciousness and felt very good within myself and got onto my bed. Immediately three words began repeating every five seconds inside my head, they were: I love nature. After about seven repetitions of these words I found myself outside my upstairs bedroom window in Churchfield Road, Acton, West London. I looked back at the bedroom window an saw my body lying on the bed. I did not want to return to it because I was totally immersed in Divine love so moved towards a white cloudy tunnel filled with Divine Light but before In got to it I realized that it was not my time for that. So I turned back towards the window went through the glass without breaking it and entered my body on the bed. All I was aware of being while I was outside my body was consciousness. I am not a religious person but by experiencing transcendental consciousness twice a day for the past 44 years I must be spiritual. That out of body experience happened three weeks after I learned how to experience transcendental consciousness I the summer of 1979. It taught me that I am not my body and mind, I am consciousness. Scientists cannot ever fathom consciousness because it is unmanifest. Likewise scientists could never fathom Divine Universal Consciousness that is spread through the universe. That is what God is an is the administrator of Karma. Live long and prosper.

@benji-5796

9 ай бұрын

Hey! My question is if we are consciousness or not does it really matter if when we die it’s all over for us anyway.

I had the experience of consciousness emerging from matter when I co-created a child.

@masondnatube

11 ай бұрын

That’d be an interesting question. I suppose it’s a bit tricky still as you don’t see the moment consciousness is apparent in your child and how that comes to be. I’d like to hear Rupert’s thoughts on it though 🙂

@michaelstarmayr2882

11 ай бұрын

@@masondnatube No, but I did see the moment when consciousness was not apparent in my child, because he wasn't created yet, so consciousness must have come into being along with the physical development. Rupert's take on this topic would be very interesting.

@holycannoli64

11 ай бұрын

It appeared that way to your finite mind because time is how finite mind understands the world of forms.

@heikeahlbory1738

11 ай бұрын

You are aware of awareness. What in you is experiencing the awareness that your child hast? I can't say that I am experiencing the awareness of my daughter, love.❤

@Jamesgarethmorgan

11 ай бұрын

Yeah that was my thought too. Plus just because you've never seen consciousness appearing out of matter does not preclude that that is indeed how consciousness manifests. The thing to get - is that matter does not exist. The hard problem of consciousness goes away when you see that time and space are mental projections and not real. Time and space are not fundamental. Consciousness is. Search for Bernardo Kastrup - he's totally got this and explains it very well.

consciousness emerges when I wake and subsides when I sleep (unconsciousness, death). That is my direct experience.

@brigitteh4825

11 ай бұрын

So what is aware of your experience?

@jjjos

11 ай бұрын

Well technically conscious is definitely there in your dream when you sleep. And consciousness is there when you wake up. So, your question is consciousness is not present in deep sleep. Now, if lack of consciousness, or death as you say, which is a fair point, death is the end of consciousness, people fear death, isn’t it odd we are not terrified of sleep, knowing we will renter deep sleep and effectively die. Yet we love deep sleep. So, would it not be more your experience that you lose consciousness of forms (thoughts, images etc) during deep sleep, hence it’s impossible to recall anything in memory of deep sleep. But, that isn’t really proof of losing consciousness, that’s proof of losing consciousness of things.

@brigitteh4825

11 ай бұрын

@@jjjos I think Rupert says that, in deep sleep, the mind is at rest hence there are no perceptions. Consciousness is always present: in the waking state, dream state, and deep sleep.

@jjjos

11 ай бұрын

@@brigitteh4825 well consciousness is definitely present as a disturbance will still wake you from deep sleep. But, perhaps an anaesthetic would be a better example. But even then the biological functions are performing so consciousness is obviously present. But the mind is quiescent. So what about death? Is that the ultimate end of consciousness? well it’s impossible to really say of course, but I’d say only to the personal form in which consciousness is residing temporarily. Consciousness is everywhere after all, and if you remove the personal connections to your version of consciousness, when you see consciousness as non personal, and it is non personal, as it is in all animals etc so it’s not personal, then we have to conclude consciousness is uniform (wrong word really) but it’s without form, it’s the same in essence, it’s not defined with attributes, so where would it go. People go, animals go, but we can’t say consciousness goes, only it’s seeming temporary shape goes, but that’s not essential to it, I don’t think anything I’ve said is too wacky, seems a fair analysis I’d say.

@lindsaycoffey3327

11 ай бұрын

Exactly, & of course as Rupert says repeatedly you were never born, you will never die, you are aware that you’re aware thus you are eternal.

How would it appear? How would you measure it? I've certainly seen the light go on in people's eyes when something dawns on them, that's for sure. So what was matter apoears to become more conscious.

WOW I hadn’t seriously considered (my)consciousness to this degree since being 18 yrs old when visiting Stonehenge free festival in June 1982. Thankyou 😁❤️

Yes, consciousness emerged as an embryo develops into fetus and eventually into a baby and a child. It starts out not conscious and then at some point consciousness emerges. What else would you call it? And I assume when people die their consciousness disappears. When I am put under anesthesia, I am not conscious. Then when I come out, my consciousness remeerges. I have felt it return.

'Has anybody ever observed consciousness arising from matter?'. Yes, Rupert, it can be observed in the growth of every human being during transition from fertilized egg to screaming baby.

@andrekoster9708

10 ай бұрын

I also found it fascinating that this simple fact was overlooked.

@johnstewart7025

10 ай бұрын

Someone said what about anesthesia or sleep. But, perhaps that is no memory, not consciousness itself. Vedanta claims consciousness is aware of mind and its contents.

@hazelthepoet

10 ай бұрын

I would go further back. Consciousness is a side effect of life. From the first organism would have had some sense of eat this, mate with that and very little else. Through the many millions of years of evolution and growth of organisms, some of us anxious apes consider ourselves the top of the consciousness tree. Contemplating our place in the universe. Meanwhile, I suspect the universe looks at us and metaphorically shakes its head. Life is more complex than we dare to dream. We still have much to learn. Also, I am an idiot. If you listen to me, you are falling for the same trick. I fall for it all the time. Consciousness perceiving itself is prone to leading itself up the garden path. I should get out more.

@jai6196

10 ай бұрын

Consciousness is not just self awareness. Consciousness exists even if you are sleeping or in coma.

@isaac1572

10 ай бұрын

@@jai6196 No, that is called being unconscious.

The idea that we automatically do certain things is deceptive but nessesary. What we call unconsciousness is really a dissassociation of responsibility. I am the one actively running my body. I don't mentally need to understand how I run, jump, or open my hand, which are associated with conscious experiences. I also don't need to mentally understand how I run my circular system before birth. Unlike a tree that spends all its energy and time focused on the processes necessary for its life, I dedicate my awareness to the interaction with the other. With focus I may witness what appears to be happening to me, but the separation between my mind and body is a game I play to maintain order.

How do they separate awareness from the brain? What about neuroscience and brain injuries? How can someone explain their awareness without a brain?

Really disappointed with this. Of course, if we have no evidence for the theory that consciousness is an emergent property, we can't subscribe to it with any certainty. But that doesn't mean that we are free to just make something up - as you appear to be doing. You are just saying that, therefore, the opposite must be true. Your evidence is no more compelling for your position. At this point we have solved nothing - we just don't know yet. I was impressed with the younger man's intellectual honesty however.

One doesn't have to "feel" consciousness "emerging" for it to be emergent, how silly. The constructed sense of "self" is what experiences awareness. Awareness (consciousness) existed before the "self" was created, as infants and before, but there was no "I" constructed to experience it. That's why "we" are not aware of ourselves as infants -- because the "we" that we consider ourselves to be literally didn't exist yet!

@JennyRSTeam

11 ай бұрын

We appreciate your contribution. With Love, Rupert's team

Modern research on Near Death Experience by Raymond moody, reincarnation memories by Ian Stevenson/Jim trucker and past lives regression by Brian Weiss all independently but coincidentally show that our consciousness survive death, we live many lives and our thoughts and actions matter in the hereafter. So be kind and helpful to others, be virtuous, meditate and cultivate ourselves to higher spiritual levels. Cheers.

The sad truth is people will listen this entire interview and then still seek for enlightenment. It doesn't get any better than this.

@josef2012

11 ай бұрын

To be fair,it's a pretty dry conversation. People need some "juice" to feel engaged,usually emotionally.

@JennyRSTeam

11 ай бұрын

🙏 with love, Rupert's team

@tulip2084

10 ай бұрын

Awareness doesn’t get anything.

@kevinbailey8827

10 ай бұрын

How sad if it doesn't get any better than this.

@michaelmitchell2143

10 ай бұрын

@@kevinbailey8827 The pointing is very clear.

Absolutely brilliant and clear. If only Fauci, Gates, Trump and Biden had a brain to understand this too. 😂😂

@mikefoster5277

11 ай бұрын

Those guys you mention are all caught up in living the human dream world. Why are they? Because everyone else is too! They are simply responding to what they see around them - to what they perceive as reality.

@jddr555

11 ай бұрын

Trump has a brain

@wattaura7621

11 ай бұрын

Do away with the word 'mind' then & just use the words 'awareness' or 'consciousness'. I understand what is meant, but mind can so easily be coupled or confused with the brain.

@cazalis

11 ай бұрын

@@mikefoster5277 for sure Mike But if only! All the best.

@cazalis

11 ай бұрын

@@jddr555 oh, I wasn't aware of his singularity

The mind is only the brain. Ramana Maharshi states this clearly saying, "it is inert, limited, partite and changing like wax.' It is only thought and the brain itself is a thought. What the teaching states is that the mind is NOT what's conscious, fools you into thinking it is, which hides the reality that all is consciousness.

@AuroCords

11 ай бұрын

The brain is only the mind

@davidalbro2009

11 ай бұрын

This is not true. Thoughts occur apart from the brain. The brain is simply a receptor of thought vibration just as eyes are a receptor of light vibration or the ears are a receptor sound vibration. Thoughts reoccur and have some level of sustainability despite having no mechanical or physical origin in the brain. The mind is much more than the brain.

@TheDeepening718

11 ай бұрын

@@AuroCords and the brain is an object in the mind. It's funny how scientists forget that everything they know about reality they know via mind, such as the brain.

@HAL_NlNETH0USAND

11 ай бұрын

@@davidalbro2009 That's profoundly not true. There is no mind without the brain. The mind or consciousness is the activity of the brain. It is itself an activity. There's no need introducing pseudo scientific terms like though vibration or whatever.

@Aed-Adlan

11 ай бұрын

The mind is NOT part of the brain. And the brain can't do telepathy. The mind fucks up the brain like spirit does to matter. Like soul does to body. Like God does to the ego. Like I do to demons. Like Spirituality and Religion does to Atheism. Easy.

My personal belief is that the entire universe (all matter, space, etc) is emergent from consciousness. Most scientists (from a variety of disciplines) try in one way or another to turn that around on itself. This is the major misconception of reductionist, or materialistic reasoning which causes so much confusion for so many people. I understand what the guest was TRYING to say with regard to “consciousness being indivisible”. I ALSO understand what the host was getting at as he attempted to express (or ask if) each of us is “a part of one infinite consciousness”. I think an analogy of “mind” could be helpful here. We all have at least a basic understanding of what a mind is (more so than what consciousness is). Each “thought” in your mind, is separate from other thoughts…. Is like a separate “point” of focus within your mind. Your mind remains “a larger whole”…. While its individual thoughts can each be thought of as separate “parts” of the whole, or as individual “focal points”. To answer the guest’s question, “what are you?”, I would say that “I” am an individual “focal point” of an infinite consciousness…. And that infinite consciousness, is everything that is. The guest is trying hard to express something that is extremely difficult for most to grasp…. And I believe that he is on the right track. However, his style of explanation at some points…. Was reminiscent of speaking with a “flat earther”. I imagine he must get a lot of “push back”, regardless of probably being correct.

The fact that consciousness can leave the body and then return shows it is not part of the body / physical brain. It doesn't require oxygen or anything else physical. However there seems to be two different ways consciousness can emerge: firstly that which happens during extreme trauma, when consciousness comes out of and rises above the body, the other when consciousness leaves the physical plane completely during the latter stages of advanced meditation. When it leaves completely it expands to the point of infinity. And yes the feeling at this point is of overwhelming LOVE and brightness. Both Buddhism and Hinduism agree on this fundamental point.

@subspace666

10 ай бұрын

what facts ? no such thing exists. consciousness is a abstract concept its not in the physical plane to begin with so it can't leave it. we know now the brain can create powerful DMT like drugs with massive trauma or when near death so we have no reason to still believe all this NDE nonsense.

I own the answers and because of that I refuse to teach it to the world. You are not worthy. The power I wield can never be in the hands of the public.

The problem right at the beginning of this discussion is that no thought appears to be given to what an experience of consciousness emerging from matter would look or be like. By necessity, you only experience your own consciousness. You might (correctly or incorrectly) infer consciousness exists as part of matter, or more precisely, as an effect of matter, outside yourself, for example by the correlation of facial movement as Rupert speaks with what appears to be (from experience) the physical communication of conscious ideas. And you can connect the brain up to instruments that show electro-chemical activity that also appears to indicate the presence of consciousness. But you're not going to experience that consciousness because it's not 'yours' to experience. This is what makes consciousness surely the most peculiar phenomenon that exists.

Because you are in the body, you experience what the body experiences. You are not the experience you are that which experienced it. The body receives the experience, and you (not the body) experience it. No one can explain how you control the body or create thoughts. The reality is that it is because you do not. But you experience it as if you do. Read a book called Making Sense of Nonsense by Raymond Moody to understand that which doesn't make sense to you. It is that simple. God is existence and nothing exists that is not god. We (awareness, separation) are God's creation from ourselves. Thank you for sharing this with us. God's love and wisdom (LAW) to you all ❤️ RW

It's not just consciousness that's hard to understand. It's perception. The image that we have in our heads and the perception of colour is nothing short of amazing.

@mikelisteral7863

9 ай бұрын

images are not in the head the head is an image

Emergence is visible as a product of complexity many places in nature, consciousness is likely no exception. There are limits to perception that are tied to the size of our nerve structure - we cannot feel beyond that. That to me at least implicates the nervous system in conscious perception.

@hyperduality2838

10 ай бұрын

Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat superposition. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis (alive, being) is dual to anti-thesis (not alive, non being) creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic or Hegel's cat (Fichte's cat). Schrodinger's cat is based upon Hegel's cat and he stole it from Plato (Socrates). Duality (thesis, anti-thesis) creates or synthesizes reality (non duality). The rule of two -- Darth Bane, Sith lord. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Form is dual to formlessness. "Physics is what we know, metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell.

@16:25 he explains the concept of Satyam Shivam Sundaram

The reason for our becoming self-conscious, or self-aware, creatures will become apparent later on, when we begin exploring the nature of being human in greater detail. But this human self-consciousness is something quite different in nature to the reality of the Consciousness that lies behind and within everything to appear as the myriad forms in existence. Consciousness inhabits and animates creation and its creatures not unlike the power that flows through a computer to make it work in accordance with the hardware and software of the device. By this analogy, the specific physical characteristics of a creature’s body constitute the hardware, and the programming of its mind the software. These things are important to understand because if this conceptual ground is not firm, the model we build from here will not endure, and its potential value will be lost. What all this is pointing to is that what you really are―what we all are―is an eternal, unlimited energy source capable of creating and experiencing events. What you are is this creative source, this Consciousness. Who you are is how this Consciousness works through you to express as something unique in the world. Powerful creative Consciousness is your true and essential nature, but of course, you experience your life through the limitations of a human body, so it may not seem that you are an all-powerful being at times, or indeed ever. By its very nature, the body exists as some ‘thing’ and is, therefore, a limitation or restriction of ‘everything else possible’, to become something specific and useful―a human being. And then it must be remembered that these bodies we inhabit are a product of Mother Earth, and have developed for good reasons. Although today there are many philosophes, theories and just sheer guesses put forward to explain the purpose of our existence, none of them fully describe or satisfactorily explain the original intention for our emergence. Some bodies born into this world have, or will develop over time, physical or mental attributes that further alter the creative opportunities and experiences available to them in a lifetime. The influence of our national culture, the general culture of our times, and the impact of our upbringing by parents and other significant people also become major influences that can place limitations on our thinking and power. Other restrictions occur as a result of the pains we might experience in life, the emotions that often get buried in the body as a result, and the accumulating limited beliefs they then give rise to. There is also the concept of ‘karmic debt’ that will limit opportunities, and this too will be discussed later in the work. The state of your own evolved Consciousness is another factor affecting personal power. All these things limit the opportunities you have in life, and so it can be seen that although your true nature is something quite grand, you find yourself in very limiting circumstances. But it is important to keep perspective. Your essential nature is a free and unlimited Consciousness, a potential capable of eternal creation and experience. And this Consciousness was the reality before the Universe that we know emerged. What is Creative Visualization Creative visualization is the technigue of using your imagination to create/manifest what you want in your life. You are already using it every day, every minute in every moment in fact. It is your natural power of imagination, the basic creative energy of the universe which you use constantly whether or not you are aware of it. Every thought you have ever had is creative and attracts like energy. Thoughts of fear will manifest those fears onto the physical realm and thoughts of love will manifest your highest thoughts onto the physical plane. All you have to do is relax deeply and picture/meditate a desired goal in your mind exactly the way you want it to be. The Creative Power Within The new world is being built as we open to the higher power of the universe and consciously allow that creative energy to move through us. As each of us connects with our spiritual awareness, we learn that the creative power of the universe is within us. We also learn that we can create our own reality and take responsibility for doing so. Creating a New Way of Life We are living in a very exciting and powerful time. On the deepest level of consciousness, a radical spiritual transformation is taking place. On a world-wide level, we are being challenged to let go of our present way of life and create an entirely new one. We are, in fact, in the process of releasing our old world and building a new world in its place. The change begins with each individual, but as more and more individuals are being transformed, the mass consciousness is increasingly affected, and the results will be manifested in the world around us. Looking Within The old world as based on an external focus. We had come to believe that the material world was the only reality. Thus, feeling essentially lost, empty, and alone, we have continually attempted to find happiness through addiction to external things such as money, material possessions, relationships, work, fame, food or drugs. Today, as we begin to remember our fundamental spiritual connection, we can look within for the source of our satisfaction, joy, and fulfillment. As the New Emerges the Old Gives Way For many people this time may be distressing because the world situation and/or our personal lives may seem to be going from bad to worse. It's as if many things that used to work are not working anymore. Paradoxical as it may seem, these changes are the most incredible blessing that any of us could possibly imagine. The simple truth is that the old way of life has never brought us the deep fulfillment, satisfaction, and joy that we have always sought. We must let go of the old forms which limit us or don't fit anymore in order to make way for the new. Our Divine Potential There is no separation between God and us. We are divine expressions of the creative priciples on this level of existence. We contain the potential for everything within us. Manifestation through creative visualization is the process of realizing and making visible on the physical plane our divine potential. Contacting the Source One of the most important steps in making creative visualization work is to have the experience of connecting with your inner creative source. I like to think of contacting the source as contacting with your higher self, the god-like being who dwells within you. Being in contact with your higher self is characterized by a deep sense of knowingness. You know that you are creating your own world and that you have infinite power to create it as you desire. A Source Deep Within As we explore the process of creating our own reality, we begin to realize that the creative power we are feeling is coming from some source other than our personality/ego selves. It seems to come from some place deep within ourselves. We become interested in discovering what this creative force is and how it works. We realize that "it" (our higher self) knows more than "I" (our personality self). We find out what the inner guidance is telling us and follow it. Enlightenment When we begin to open up to a spiritual path, we may go through many different exoeriences and processes in our search, but eventually we come back to an experience of our true selves, the god-like nature or universal mind that is within us all. Through this experience we are eventually restored to our full spiritual power. The emptiness inside us, the fear of loss, is filled up from within and spiritual healing has restored us to our true self. This is the process known as enlightenment.

The universe is in the form of a brain cell, and is electrical in nature. This electricity and form creates an either, throughout the universe, that is something akin to pure conciousness. Conciousness being broadcast much like a radio signal. Our brains, collections of electric brain cells each mimicking the form of the universe, are similar to a radio antenna. Each of us, with our own unique antennas, are tuned to a certain small bandwidth of that master conciousness. This "radio signal", if you will, together with our free will of action, makes us who we are. Our bodies, actions, and experiences are individual, but our conciousness is shared. This may not be true of course, but i believe its a compelling theory.

Thank you

As a Palamite I find it similar to Maximos the Confessor Ambigua 7. Namely the eternal Logos emanate logoi or ideas. Each of them eventually manifest consciousness gradually from conception to birth. Maximos spoke about ignorance of the true Logos and attachment to worldly passion. This is sinilar to Purnam Advaita Hindu view and Sunyatta Shentong Buddhist view. Basically wakefulness is attachment to passion through five senses or five aggregates which cause ignorance of our theosis or deification. Hesychasm meditation help us to attain stillness into dream state where attachment to passion is controlled by mindfulness. But we're still attached to passion of mind and not free. Then with strict asceticism we attain double negation or negation of apophaticism in deep sleep where there are no worldly passion and passion of mind but consciousness alone.

All of us have had the experience of consciousness emerging, in the womb and early childhood. Maybe sound reasoning has never emerged from this guy.

Very well delivered..more power to you Rupert

I think the true problem of consciousness is determining what purpose it serves, and/or what conditions it is a reaction to. I have simplified my personal definition of consciousness to 'an awareness of space-'time' and still find no advantage to consciousness that is in any way superior to organisms or systems with no awareness of space-time. It therefore does not likely originate in action and reaction, nor is it likely to have evolved as a survival mechanism. It is applied to survival by organisms who possess it, despite its inefficiency and unreliability, but that strikes me as a work-around. We improvise (a product of consciousness) uses for consciousness in terms of survival because it is a resource we have access to. Kind of like using a screwdriver as a pry bar. It is obviously foreign to our evolutionary development, is from elsewhere, and serves a purpose unknown. No wonder it is hard to talk about.

Allahu Akbar..! Dear Rupert Sen Allah'ın insanlığa bir hediyesisin..! Ruhun varlığını ve mahiyetini öğretiyorsun tüm insanlığa .. ❤❤❤

This guy is a Buddhist. Consciousness can't be located. It's neither in or out of the mind. And the self is an illusion. This is great!

My experience is that this entity (me) is what is being conscious - matter is not absent from this experience of mind. Consciousness has never been observed to emerge in the absence of matter. If we accept that matter exists.

@rupert what is matter and what is it good for (e.g. for consciousness) ...only for individualisation, for trouble to learn with? Why should we? Why be here? The first question's answer would be sweet.