Some youtuber's craftsmanship is so awesome that they don't need commentary and you're *best* among them

@Ken1704

4 жыл бұрын

The process is more fascinating to me than the ultimate product.

@glocx627

3 жыл бұрын

Lol u see Description?

@glocx627

3 жыл бұрын

Lol face palm

@glocx627

3 жыл бұрын

High moments

@whatman6199

3 жыл бұрын

I dont think he made this bro Ive seen them on other channels

You inspire me to go out into my freezing work shop rather than just keeping warm watching KZread

A small reflector around the back of the bulb would have both increased captured heat energy while blocking some of the wind that was taking away the heat.

@anthonydunn729

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly! There's no way a fresnel lens on a good day wouldn't put out more energy than that. Cool set up tho

@letsplayrandomstuff6266

5 жыл бұрын

cool setup to make usage of the sun for a sterling engine. but right, i was thinking something similar. i would consider a few optimisation in terms of energyloss. Moreover Energy is not equal to voltage. the interesting part is "how much power does it produce?".

@-7-man

5 жыл бұрын

The 1k odd people who disliked this probably worked on the hubble space telescope.

@dazzershell

5 жыл бұрын

Geologysts used umbrella and broken mirror pieces to make "giant spherical mirror" sun collector for cooking without fire. Solar power from 1 square meter is near 1kW, it was effective to boil water.

@Cesar-ey7wu

5 жыл бұрын

maybe cooling the other side would help, too

Your thinking (as demonstrated through your work here) exhibits extraordinary levels of creativity and precision.

Legend build mate, all your projects are engineering at it’s finest. Well done

$500 in materials, $800 in Shop Labor an $3000 worth of tools to build a machine that can almost power a single LED. That sounds like something I would do too.

@shinigamilee5915

3 жыл бұрын

You nailed it! I have no idea why anyone would build a Sterling engine. It's as if practical science is no longer available for purchase and you have to build a shed with Covid price-gouged lumber and you're proud to say you don't even have a yard or tools.

@roadster241

3 жыл бұрын

@@shinigamilee5915 Swedish Gotland class submarines are equipped with additional Stirling motors drive. In this configuration, the period of residence underwater was increased to many weeks. Science? Yes..

@Patrick-tf1ri

2 жыл бұрын

Covid lockdown fever!!!!

@filthycasul1804

2 жыл бұрын

@@shinigamilee5915 cuz some people enjoy it. it's like watching youtube when you could be out working and earning money or w/e. sometimes it's nice to just do stuff because you enjoy it, not because it's practical :P

@corruptedcalculator703

Жыл бұрын

Then don’t built it dumbass

Man, lathes are so freaking cool.

@thetaai8262

5 жыл бұрын

they will get you fucked up pretty bad if used improperly though

@liggerstuxin1

3 жыл бұрын

thetaai same with any powerful tools.

The unit is so impressive, and watching your craftsmanship blew my mind. I’d buy a scaled model from you for my yacht 👍

Love to see how far this could be scaled up as the Sun is an almost infinite energy supply

@dercncplaner

23 күн бұрын

already done and is available. But you need helium to fill inside and it escapes.

I like all the work you did. I am a machinist as well. Recommendation: Make a larger bracket for the lens that mounts to the extruded aluminum frame rather than the engine.

A nice bit of blue sky engineering there, well done, well executed and many things learned in the process.

Another work of detailed art! Thank you Johnny. Has anyone made usable from these mini engines? Keep up the good works mate. Greatest new year.

Super Hero! Your super powers: the details.

@raminatazade5376

6 жыл бұрын

:D

@angrydragonslayer

6 жыл бұрын

glaz main?

@dusanobradovic752

5 жыл бұрын

angrydragonslayer DETAILS

"I need a power hacksaw"... Sounds like you just decided on your next project: NITRO HACKSAW!

@johnnyq90

6 жыл бұрын

Haha this one must be reliable, so not an option. What I'm planning though is a micro nitro chainsaw ;)

@mrquicky

6 жыл бұрын

Perhaps just get a bandsaw instead?

@user-po6hn9id1t

6 жыл бұрын

JohnnyQ90 αεροτουρμπινα

@Twinfire

6 жыл бұрын

Bosch Nanoblade has the bar and chain for you.

@MangalSingh-mb3sf

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks

The craftsmanship is outstanding! Satisfying to watch and you should be proud of yourself, it amazing.

That thing that spins the metal is so satisfying

@MikeTrieu

5 жыл бұрын

Are you referring to the lathe?

Instead of Fresnel Lenses I suggest you use a parabolic mirror, you can do it with a plate satellite dish and little mirrors

@JustAnotherAlchemist

6 жыл бұрын

+1 Read my mind; was thinking literally the exact same thing the whole time I was watching this. MythBusters did one exactly the same way when they did the roman death ray myth. It didn't work for them, but I always thought it would work great with some fine tuning. On a side note, rear projection TVs have biblical sized Fresnel lenses in them.

@GordonGarvey

6 жыл бұрын

tornadotyphoon it's been researched as an alternative to solar cells in NASA

@Anvilshock

6 жыл бұрын

Search for "space blanket parabolic" on KZread.

@duanecjohnson

5 жыл бұрын

You mean like this? www.redrok.com/electron.htm#mrea2001 redrok redrok.com

@leonardbrucerussell4208

5 жыл бұрын

tornadotyphoon ni

thanks for posting. excellent work. some thoughts for you and your subs. it is convenient to load a stirling engine, by using a STEP-UP mechanism to drive a small motor. in order to achieve highest output efficiency from a low-torque engine, the engine MUST have a mechanical advantage, over the load. in other words, reduction gearing; NOT step-up gearing. note that, even where output torque is high (motorcycle or car engine), the system is designed so that the engine ALWAYS has mechanical advantage over the load; via sprocket and chain or the reduction gearing, within a differential. thanks, for demonstrating a way to retrofit a desk-top engine; making it suitable for quality, output power experimentation. with the the inclusion of reduction gearing in the system, the final component needed is a suitable, purpose-made, pma. the optimum load that the engine should experience, is determined, in part, by the need for loaded speed of the engine to be 85 percent of its un-loaded speed; 85 is a guesstimate. resistance can be varied, in the coil circuit, as a simple way to match the load to the engine, initially. one aspect, of an efficient pma design, is that the generating coils MUST be correctly made. in general, a generating coil should consist of thirty to thirty-five turns, of 14 - 16awg magnet wire. (a generating coil can be made using smaller wire, by winding multiple strands 'in hand', into a single conductor of correct gauge.) if a greater length of smaller wire is used to make a generating coil, the internal resistance significantly limits output current (amps). power equals WATTS. watts equals volts TIMES amps. cheers

This is a piece of Art..!! Well done Sir...!!!

This is huge. Thanks for sharing this project with us.

Dang. You are so good at everything...

@mofkarim

4 жыл бұрын

steelavocado even doing nothing?

Im high right now and the first thing that popped up in my mind is how this looks like a sweet glass vaporizer. This moment is a dream come true. I'm actually observing something cool that works.

Extremely high quality build! Fantastic craftsmanship, really!

The great thing about this video is that it shows that anyone with minimal skills can build this with just the basic tools, parts, equipment, and materials lying around the shop. My 12 YO son and I built this very same model and it only cost us 50 man hours and $300 in tools and materials to prove that a $50 Stirling engine made in China, and bought on Amazon, can be powered by a solar lens.

The machinist always wins.... I wish I knew one to make an eccentric shaft for my 3 rotor

@mrono1910

6 жыл бұрын

SLF496x go to an local engineering school They will probably do it for you for free I know we did when i were in school And it was free btw because they looked at jobs like that as learning

@magnuswf

6 жыл бұрын

What's an eccentric shaft? And by 3 rotor, do you mean rotary car engine or what? Just curious

@SLF496x

6 жыл бұрын

Magnus Frederiksen an eccentric shaft is the rotary engine equivalent to a crankshaft

@magnuswf

6 жыл бұрын

SLF496x i thought so. Thx

@lyteyearz5810

5 жыл бұрын

I was born with an eccentric shaft. 😏🤷‍♂️

Johnny!! Forgive me, I don't wanna be "that guy".. but seriously no gloves while working with spinney things. I'm lucky I still have a hand. It happens quicker than you'd ever imagine. Brilliant work per usual!

@aomanchutube

5 жыл бұрын

@Newbie Failmaster yeah this is part of day one training. No gloves, no jewelery, no long sleeves.

Amazing Lathe skills! This concept is genius and more efficient than conventional solar panels

There is a great community on this thread. I see a lot of comments about the efficiency and stating it would be better to just use a solar panel. In this case yes it would be, but that was not the point of this project. Nice work on what this engine is and thanks for the video. If people want better efficiency, then an engine that is designed for the purpose would need to be used. This engine is basically a toy or demonstration tool. It is not designed for efficiency. It is not designed to run continuously for a long time (it would wear out relativity quickly due to poor lubrication and bearing design). A better engine would cost more than PV panels though so there would need to be other reasons to bother. The main reason I see to create solar stirling is the ability to store thermal energy and use that energy after the sun is down. We don't have a good low cost electric energy storage medium (though batteries have improved significantly). There could be a small total efficiency gain as well, but the cost of such an engine wouldn't be justified over competing technologies.

You make Wonderful things, that is so fantastic absolutly amazing!!! You are a Genius!!

I love the way you make things elegant and more elaborate than they need to be.

The entire world should be powered by A Solar Powered Stirling Engine...

You had something that worked .... And then to change one bit meant there was no going back. Its cool how you kept going to get the final result... Fantastic

I’d love to have your skills to do this kind of thing, it’s an art form in itself.

Amigo, o seu projeto ficou fantástico e com um excelente desenho. Parabéns! Rio RJ Brasil

Ohne Zweifel weit mehr als ein Handwerker - ein zauberhafter Universal-Künstler 🍀🙏🏼 Danke!! 🙋🏻

Whether useful or not, I really enjoyed watching the energy of the sun turned into mechanical movement and electricity. Solar panels convert solar energy to electricity more efficiently, but as a teacher, it gives me joy and inspiration to see the process with moving parts. Well done!

I dont really know english terminology of engines, but that thing you painted black (hot side?) ideally should be handled diffirently. In order to increase performance of sunlight, you must project light onto absolute black body that is hidden in absolute white body. That way heat will go away less quickly due to the fact that white body radiate less "radiant energy" (as we call it in my contry) and more "radiant energy" is absorbed by absolute black body. Long story short, paint place that lit by sunlight black, shadow side must be painted white, and in order to create model of absolutely black body you must place the surface a little bit lover that other "hot side's" surface in order to catch radiation reflected by surface by walls of said surface difference. Model of absolute black body presented in wikipedia's page named "black body"

Using a decade resistor, you can determine the maximum power point(useful watts at various loads). Then you can change gear ratio's or even motor/generators and maybe eventually get it to do something useful, like power a radio or charge a battery. You really want solar tracking on that bad boy or you would have to re-adjust the lens way to often. Also, using carbon black to coat the inside of the tube would likely be more effective. Great job by the way.

@zachreyhelmberger894

6 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/iH9lvNRyoqu2caQ.html

@jordanjacobson6046

5 жыл бұрын

You cant paint the inside of the tube, or put anything in it. The displacer, which is like a piston, but loose fitting, or with holes in it to allow the working gas to pass through/around, is located in that tube and uses it as its cylinder. Painting the inside would create too much friction. also, you couldnt do anything with the empty space at the end of the tube because a stirling engine needs the displacer to not go all the way to either end of the cylinder.

@mojoblues66

3 жыл бұрын

Assuming a 0.2x0.3m Fresnel Lens and 20% efficiency, the max output would be 17 Watt.

@truthseeking3818

Жыл бұрын

Ahhh yess.. Another brilliant KZread Scientist with his notions on things he truly does not even understand the system of. Wonderful!

I watch ALL your videos my friend but I have to say that this one is my favorite by far. You're just one creative son of gun! Thanks for uploading all that you do! God Bless you and your family.

2 vids = WINNING =) Another awesome creation my friend. Thank you for sharing mate

Not 1... BUT 2 VIDEOS!?!! HELL YES Edit: anyone who is better at the math then I am, willing to try and take a stab at seeing what efficiency that is getting?

@andrewmalaty8

6 жыл бұрын

We need to know the current as well as the voltage. Power in watts equals Voltage times Current --> P=VI, also the area of the Fresnel lens is needed. Some assumptions need to be made. A general agreed upon number of watts per square meter on earth is about 1000 W/m^2. Also if we assume that the lens is perfectly focused on the Stirling engine then its just a matter of dividing the output of the engine by the input from the area of the Fresnel lens.

@jerryguerra348

6 жыл бұрын

Andrew Malaty would you also need to figure the type and amount of fuel used to heat the lens? Than subtract that from the total out put of the generator? On the first video Sterling engine. Im not a electrical engineer. Just a mechanic.

@andrewmalaty8

6 жыл бұрын

I'm not sure what you mean by "heat the lens". If you are looking for efficiency of the system with solar power as the input then all you need is output/input. In fact the power from the sun is much higher than 1000 W/m^2 but a lot of energy is lost in the atmosphere. at the surface of the earth its close to 1000 W/m^2 on a sunny day. if we know the input which is the amount of power hitting the Fresnel lens, and the output which is the voltage times the current, we don't care about whats happening in between (as long as no more energy is being inserted into the system). Edit: Also not a electrical engineer, just a mechanical engineering student in final year.

@jerryguerra348

6 жыл бұрын

Andrew Malaty in the first video, the Sterling Engine has a lens tube on the head of the engine. There is a fire the heats the collector to heat the air to run the engine. There has to be a fuel that is used to create the flame. The cost of the fuel, the amount of fuel burned and the wick burn rate expended to maintain the flame are all part of the energy expended to create the voltage or current to power the LED. All that information is needed to figure out the coefficiencie of the system. Is the energy expended to power the generator for the light greater or less than the amount of power the LED uses to light up?

@andrewmalaty8

6 жыл бұрын

I was discussing how to calculate efficiency of the system he built here in this video not the one in the previous video. For a flame powered system you would need to know the energy that is released from the chemical reaction of the fuel burning and compare that to the energy that the system produces. It would be interesting to see how the efficiency of these two systems compare.

I liked, very nice. I think that will be a lot more efficient if the solar collector (glass part) will be painted in the inside instead of the outside. That way the hottest surface of the glass will be inside instead outside... more heat to your machine and less heat lost to the outside air.

@joshuawhite3411

5 жыл бұрын

You can't do that because the piston would rip all of the paint off when the machine is in motion if it is painted on the inside.

@TheRealMrMagic

4 жыл бұрын

@@joshuawhite3411 if done proper the piston should never touch the walls of the glass bulb.

@MrCh0o

4 жыл бұрын

I'd rather mention the fact that the glass would reflect a good amount of the light had it been painted on the inside.

Damn wow I bow to the patience you have

Это первый Стирлинг, от которого я вижу пользу). Минск приветствует вас!

Excellent video! I wonder if you'd achieve greater heat absorption with the paint layer on the inside of the reciever? Or maybe even a non-painted section on the front of the tube for collection and the rest covered in aluminum foil to reflect all focused light for higher absorption ? Overall a beautiful experiment and look forward to more!

Would you think that building a sort of solar collector, where you use mirrors to focus higher amounts of sunlight at a specific point, would allow for a design that might produce a bit more torque? Are there pretty low limits as far as what can be accomplished with this kind of engine?

@shinigami-man5727

Жыл бұрын

If a focal lense where to be used it could produce a much more efficient output and could potentially be used in circuit with others. Using a fractal prism and focus lenses could possibly produce enough focused solar radiation to operate several at once. In theory of course.

Brilliant engineering and craftsmanship. I'm just fascinated by this. Subscribed!

I wonder how much energy a design like this could capture on a bigger scale

that little tap at 4:08

Tudo feito com uma grande dedicação ;)

Perfect and amazing energy-generating desing!!!!!

That person is a better designer than a builder.

Ok, so considering the square footage of collection and the lens, head, mechanical, and generator losses you probably have a max of 3-3.5w to play with. If you can spin the gen head faster you can essentially better match the impedance of the system and alongside a shroud around the Stirling head you could very well get your output power to the level where a boost converter could charge a phone. I personally would replace the generator head with a 12v DC motor that has strong cogging. Anyway, with a few tweaks you just might be able to pull 10w out of that rig.

@stopthephilosophicalzombie9017

2 жыл бұрын

What is strong cogging? You mean the gears are metal?

@AtlasReburdened

2 жыл бұрын

@@stopthephilosophicalzombie9017 I mean it in the sense that when you try to turn the shaft by hand you can feel that it doesn't want to leave it's current position, but once you get it to move it jumps to the next position. This means that the either the rotor or stator is an arrangement of strong permanent magnets. Being 3 years ago, I dont remember why I used that terminology instead of just saying "permanent magnet 12vDC motor", but it may be that the channel owner was using a salvaged motor and might only be able to identify the permanent magnet type the the feel of manually turning the shaft.

If the generator can give good power, and just the voltage is not high enough, it is not a big deal. You can increase the voltage with some circuitry.

@chrisbraid2907

4 жыл бұрын

Heard of the Joule Thief ? Good circuit to get the most out of batteries, might work here ....

Man, your a champ on that lathe.

That is some very nice work, Johnny.

hey man, your work is an art!

Brilliant work, just incredibly creative design and awesome engineering skills. Great stuff :)

You are not an engineer, you are an ARTIST man ! That is a piece of Art !! Contact some museum or auction house.

Very beautiful ! Great work !

The dude just likes lathhing and milling.

@m8die319

5 жыл бұрын

Lathhing lmao! u mean turning?

Guys if you interested, these are the materials that I used: -Stirling Engine Model: goo.gl/2dobPN (8% OFF Coupon: 6d7da4) -2020 T-Slot Aluminum Extrusion: goo.gl/C6eqDV (15% OFF Coupon: MC15) -Full Page PVC Fresnel Lens Magnifier: goo.gl/aH5VVc (10% OFF Coupon: elec) -Brass Hinge: goo.gl/rmuz6k -Motorcycle Telescopic Pole Flagpole: goo.gl/7c7zP4 (12% OFF Coupon: BgAuMotor)

@amnesiacmyx

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks for this. Does anyone have any videos about, or recommendations for a good hobby lathe for a beginner?

@MyHandleIsGood

6 жыл бұрын

I like the idea of using a Fresnel Lens, although this is a very inefficient solar motor.

@danielbrackett6280

6 жыл бұрын

JohnnyQ90 can you give that to one of your subscribers(me)

@aToast3r

6 жыл бұрын

JohnnyQ90 you better make videos like these for therest of your life, i look forward to each new video and always love them

@thomasdiamond5231

6 жыл бұрын

super video inspirational in so many ways

You the best! Good to see a clever person doing something constructive.

My 12 years old kiddo said to write this for you: "mister, you could make a curved lens to avoid having to focus the fresnel lens when the sun moves". Dang. I guess he got that from his mom...

awesome!

Great video. I noticed you painted your little test-tube-thingy black on the outside - but it's not likely to be a good conductor of heat. I think it'd work better with an unpainted tube, with something black-metal inside.

@jordanjacobson6046

5 жыл бұрын

Except the test tube is the displacer cylinder so there is no room to put something in. It needs the bit of empty space at the end to even function.

one of the most aesthetically pleasing solar stirling engine builds on youtube. kudos to your hardwork. what if you built a bigger stirling enginer using your lathe? larger bore, more cc bigger generator motor.............. just wow.

Such exacting work, a pleasure to watch.

I wonder how comparable the efficiency of a solar panel is to this as far as size to power output

@giovannicesaramorim9adigan961

3 жыл бұрын

This is way cheaper than any solar cell.

@ellayararwhyaych4711

2 жыл бұрын

@@giovannicesaramorim9adigan961 SO didn't ask about cost, but the solar panel is much cheaper than this elaborate fabrication. To correctly answer the question, a panel same size as the Fresnel lens would produce about 10 watts at a modest 15% efficiency, whereas the theoretical efficiency of a Stirling engine is 40%, but then subtract the frictional losses, the lens and focus/heat transfer. I would be surprised if the Stirling engine shown can generate more than 1 watt of power.

@giovannicesaramorim9adigan961

2 жыл бұрын

@@ellayararwhyaych4711 Stirling engines have 40% efficiency, accounted with friction, and thermal losses are not even close to being the largest loss, as boilers can go up to 90% efficiency.

Hi JohnnyQ90 I was wondering where you get your aluminum and brass round stock for making parts on your lathe. I have a foundry that I use to melt down aluminum into cylinders which works but sometimes the stock will have very tiny gas bubbles that formed when it was cooling making the surface full of very tiny pot holes even after they are machined into a perfect cylinder. Thank you, Chris

@lockpicker7964

6 жыл бұрын

zombiecorp101 if you cool it down slower and vibrate it a little it will get the gas bubbles out

@zombiecorp101

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks :)

@chrisevil7012

6 жыл бұрын

try adding oxygen scavengers (materials which capture oxygen and precipitate out to the surface, forming slag), and flux to your ladle during melting to remove other dissolved impurities, as they don't 'burn off' in the heat, enough will dissolve into the melt to cause lots of problems down the road. and as lock picker said, a controlled cool will solve a lot of internal porosity problems. your flux and oxygen scavengers should handle the rest of the problems. best of luck with future ladles of aluminum.

Good work. Have you thought about flipping the cold side away from the heat source and adding a divider to keep the heat away? This would increase the differential temp and efficiency.

I have commented on using a Fresnel lens as well. After a few robotics and programming classes I was thinking about having the Fresnel lens track the sun, and also adjust the focus. I don't know how hot too hot is, but I've seen Fresnel lenses produce 3000 degrees F. They actually melted glass, metal, rock, etc.Granted they were huge lenses, but still. I had one that melted lead, and torched a 2x4 instantly, after putting it under the concentrated beam. If the Stirling engine was big enough, it could be geared down to perform some sort of work.

How much load can it take before it stalls? You have to draw power from the generator for it to offer mechanical resistance, multimeters are designed so that they have as little influence on the circuit as possible while taking a reading. Put a variable resistor and current meter across the generator and dial up the resistance until the engine is at the edge of stalling, note the current, then disconnect the resistor and measure that value. I^2R = power.

@Max_Chooch

2 жыл бұрын

I've always wondered weather or not charging a typical USB device would stall a small Stirling Engine out, and if so, how big would it need to be/how much fuel it would need to make charging a device actually practical.

i wanna be like you one day

@anthonytreen6253

6 жыл бұрын

Adrian G.Skillz I am envious of him but also inspired!

The project is wildly cool, but there’s something hilarious to me about the clips where your hands are shown and it’s slightly sped up so you move at inhuman speeds lmao

Você é um craque no torno, sensacional profissional 👏👏🇧🇷

10/10 What about amperes amount?

@Desrtfox71

6 жыл бұрын

This. We need a small sample load, and current measured at the same time as voltage. Voltage alone is pretty well meaningless. Still, it's probably the most interesting Sterling I've seen on KZread.

what is better solar panel vs this ? and i feel like that glass gonna break soon lol

Great video really, but i got a tip for you the technic for any hand saws is to use the full length of the blade, less moves, less energy, quicker cut. ;)

This concept needs to be refined and upscaled! Great work!

Maybe next time consider using a parabola/dish so that the sun always reflects onto the same focal point.

@luisenriquegallegosguerra8298

6 жыл бұрын

David Riley look the Z10 but don't use Stirling engine

I like how the camera focuses late like that.

Perfect to watch when blazed.

@SailorDaniel

4 жыл бұрын

1. Sits here watching this thinking "what F@#* am I doing and why did I just watch this all the way through?" 2. Reads your comment 3. Realizes I'm doing exactly what I should be expected to be doing right now. Nothing to be alarmed about. Thanks. May your blazes be blessed.

So beautiful engineering thank you sir

Beautiful work, but how do you track the sun?

@stacase

3 жыл бұрын

That's what I was wondering.

@smallblockchevy1022

2 жыл бұрын

A computer?

We need more of this improve it by Bigger generator Bigger wheels Bigger Lens

Its like a work of art, splendid video, it has too many hard work and effirt.

Hahaha, all those fancy power tools, and yet you're stuck cutting aluminum rail by hand with a hack saw?? That's great lol. You have so many tools that I wish I had, but in this case, I think I have one you need for a change! lol

coat the outside of an airship in heat collector panels and use stirling engines to generate electricity

any possibility of a sterling engine powered bicycle? edit: 1.5 volts, hmm probably not.

@mylesmcarthur642

4 жыл бұрын

but what is the amperage.

You need a mill more than you need a power hacksaw. That whole project was cubic clever. I liked all of it.

I’d take this over any solar panel any day! This wouldn’t lose efficiency a decade later.

All of that work for 1.5 Volts, looks like you need to do it all over again and make a larger version so it can actually do some work.

@Desrtfox71

6 жыл бұрын

Besides that, we need to see the current with some sample load. the voltage says basically nothing, by itself, regarding the energy this produces.

@snaprollinpitts

6 жыл бұрын

still, it ain't gonna be much?!

@Desrtfox71

6 жыл бұрын

snaprollinpitts indeed.

@virDAT

6 жыл бұрын

Because multimeter had set DC voltage aganist AC voltage.

@maelgugi

6 жыл бұрын

Or buy a solar panel and install it on the lens frame :D

That looks great. Did you fabricate the cylinders and pistons yourself, or is it part of a kit?

@johnnyq90

6 жыл бұрын

Yes, it's a ready-to-run stirling engine :)

So crazy how you make these things! so frickin cool!!!

Надо сделать так что-бы площадь нагрева была больше ввиде перевёрнутой пирамиды из металла, чёрного цвета! И идентичную холодную часть поставить на землю, прикрыв её от солнца! Солнце греет, земля охлаждает! Нижнюю часть можно поставить в тазик с водой, либо закопать! Но тогда Стирлинг нужен аппазитного типа!😊

I think the cost to large.. And need to monitor angle of sunlight.. The best choice is using solar panel..

@ThuanDuong-pv3xu

5 жыл бұрын

The cost to get 1 mW from Solarr stirling engine is too expensive, I agree you . But we have knowledge

I wonder what the power output is on this, compared to a solar panel the same size as the lense? Be interesting to know if the loses are more or less when converting solar energy this way?

@HrushikeshNaik1650763n73

6 жыл бұрын

1man1van loses would be obviously more. You are converting radiation energy to mechanical. After that you convert it to electrical. For such a small system it is not at all economical

@iamthetinkerman

6 жыл бұрын

Hrushikesh Naik yes, but solar panels don't use every part of the light spectrum. This way of generating could potentially make use of more energy thus making the system more efficient.

@iamthetinkerman

6 жыл бұрын

Hrushikesh Naik you try boiling some water with a solar panel compared to boiling it using the rays from a Fresnel lense, see my point?

@HrushikeshNaik1650763n73

6 жыл бұрын

1man1van quick amazon search yielded this result solar panel 1m x 0.5m rated at 18V and 5.1 Amps. That is 91.8 watts. Although radiation energy available on earth surface is 1000w/m². We are able to effectively convert only (91.8 x 2 = 183.6 W/m².

@HrushikeshNaik1650763n73

6 жыл бұрын

1man1van now for fresnel lens. The heat absorbed in water is a topic to be researched

Beautiful work!

This will be my son's school project.. Great video