NASA. Are we going to keep on using SpaceX vehicles?. Nah thats way to cheap, we've got this throwaway behemoth thats took years to build cost billions and we're super excited to watch it burn up on reentry.

I spent last night explaining to my 7 year old that the last time we went to the moon was 50 years ago. She was absolutely blown away by that. I was in “dad tears”, just because she was finally interested in something I was telling her lol.

@rustyfolts3298

2 жыл бұрын

So you lied to her.

@NotH4llow

2 жыл бұрын

@@rustyfolts3298 No , the last time a rocket was sent to the moon was 19 December 1972.

@coldeb8911

2 жыл бұрын

@@NotH4llow Just ignore these childish attention seekers Jessica, they're just trying to get a response and cause an augment, get a reaction, just like those flat earth fruitcakes. Ignoring them drives them mad because it deprives them of the attention they crave.

@coldeb8911

2 жыл бұрын

I still remember it to this day...over here in the UK.. was enthralled by all the missions after...looking forward to the next mission in 2024, imagine how much better the images are going to be this time ...Marvellous 😊

@georgehenry76

2 жыл бұрын

@@coldeb8911 I was born in 76 so I missed that, but I did see the challenger explode in grade 5. Or was it grade 4? Meh…

I was embarrassed for nasa in the first 30 seconds of the video when he said the rocket has been in the works since 2011 🤣🤣🤣 meanwhile starship is 3 years in starting from nothing. No rocket, no base , not infrastructure. And yet it has flown multiple times. And let's not even get into cost!

@gstatockok4142

2 жыл бұрын

LOL

Brilliant as Usual nice job Elderfox

In the era of reusable launchers, it's a travesty to see most of that gigantic hardware thrown away after each launch including the SMEs intended to be reused many times.

@vimalramachandran

2 жыл бұрын

Reusability makes sense only if there are several launches, like dozens or hundreds of them. Otherwise investing in reusable tech doesn't make financial sense. SLS is supposed to fly only a few times in the short term. NASA is primarily not a rocket manufacturer, they build rockets only when no suitable alternative is available in the market. If SpaceX Starship comes online, then NASA will happily stop building SLS and buy rides on Starship like how they do with Falcon 9 now.

@111danish111

2 жыл бұрын

This is a partially reusable rocket assembly just like Falcon 9 and several others.

Always wanted a video on this topic.

thanks Elderfox for great visuals, your voice soo engaging

this channel should have more subs

your voice is so memorizing.

@D_Marrenalv

2 жыл бұрын

Don't you mean "mesmerizing"?

@gstatockok4142

2 жыл бұрын

@@D_Marrenalv LOL

interesting, keep the videos coming

Nice job

This would have been awesome in 1981, unfortunately it's 2021.

Nice

Video on the planet Mercury and any missions carried out or planned for it pls?

What a venture to the ⭐✨!!!

Lunar base for science (wink).......mining for metals is probably #1. Strategic advantage #2.

@junkerburn2341

2 жыл бұрын

Scientists around the world: this is awesome! We'll be able to do so many tests in order to better humanity! governments: *heavy breathing down scientists necks* thats a nice moon base....would be a shame if we pulled funding if you didnt do a few favors for us...

Second most powerful rocket… (StarShip)

if the starship system works as intended, this will be such a waste of money, if they continue the program...

@leverman7517

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, they are doing it with leftover tech and old school fuel. Musk is designing new tech and fuel no one thought would work. And "No part is the best part" thinking! Building the future instead of re-building the past...

@honestmstk9790

2 жыл бұрын

The starship is just one of musks endless promises which he will never deliver.

@gistsc

2 жыл бұрын

Musk will end up replacing this system in a few years. With Boeings continuing failures and huge waste of taxpayers money, congress will not be able to justify this one and dune waste of cash. I predict Space X will end up doing all of Artemis from start to finish.

@MrChiefsmaster

2 жыл бұрын

@@honestmstk9790 do you mean like the first ever landing orbital rocket, that now is accountable for flying 3/4 of the worlds space flights? Or like Tesla that now is the most valuable and biggest EV company? And do you really think, NASA is so stupid and is selecting a fake design for their artemis mission?

@junkerburn2341

2 жыл бұрын

@@honestmstk9790 yeah, lotta people dont realize that Elon Musk in reality, is a SALESMAN. Not the brilliant scientist people think. Dudes a tool, But hes a marketing genus.

$2Billion a launch? geeezus...........

SpaceX in trouble?

I wonder if this rocket comes equip with a pink lighter

Too bad that NASA are effectively being dwarfed by SpaceX when it comes to rocket development. They're making no actual progress with their recycled rocket that isn't reusable. It's pretty much already obsolete at this point. Delays on delays on top of more delays, years late and will probably be beaten by Starship at this point.

This information is now outdated. They scratch that Gateway mission. Now they plan to send astronauts into space on the SLS rocket and then the astronauts will board Starship that will already be in orbit prior to SLS's mission and just use the Starship as the lunar lander instead and the return to Earth as well.

NASA leads the way.

This is the greatest channel

King

Ich frage mich ja immer wo die das ganze Benzin herbekommen und wie das alles da rein passen kann.

N1 SLS will never hold the record as the largest most powerful rocket, starship will be flying way before SLS. It will also do it much cheaper and be 100% reusable.

@junkerburn2341

2 жыл бұрын

I feel like NASA will be using both N1 SLS and SpaceX tech together tbh, .....they made the damn thing, might aswell use it too.

@shaneboardwell1060

2 жыл бұрын

Nah.

I thought the StarShip was the most powerful rocket ever built. Neither has flown, so if you are going to label the SLS the most powerful, then the StarShip has to be labeled as well.

Honestly, I know Artemis is much more advanced and safe than apollo, but it feels so underwhelming that it can only get the orion spacecraft to lunar orbit

Too bad that last week, they just pushed the first launch of the SLS to as late as Summer 2022. Space is hard...

@ronaldwoofer5024

2 жыл бұрын

nasa is finished, they never had any money to be relevant to begin with. its sad that spacex comes out of nowhere with all these advances so quickly. funny how that works huh? money = space

@_mikolaj_

2 жыл бұрын

Except they didn't? NET is still 22 december 2021, NASA never annouced further delays. But of course, everyone preffer to listen mr burger with his mysterious sources, who said himself he won't trust NASA on info. Hmm, then where did he get his number from? His anus? Beacuse idk where else could he find it

@ronaldwoofer5024

2 жыл бұрын

@waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in the red lmao, they get all the funding they need, they can be in the red all they want they will still operate

Nov. 2021 launch ain't happening. It's delayed to 2022.

AYO WTF

🎧 Podcasts? 🎧 Does this creator have a podcast on Google or can anybody recommend any good Podcasts along this or any other interesting genres? Any will do. I'm very open and broad minded. Many thanks 🙏😉

It appears that the US is not thinking about the space program. All they have to do is send fuel cylinders to the moon. Then all our trips will start from the moon cutting out the gravity drag of earth. Once on the moon, we will go far.

Looks like a step backwards, instead of forwards. A one use rocket that takes years to manufacture.

@WEKS87

2 жыл бұрын

Depends on your point of view I guess; right now the USA has nothing, so anything, from nothing, is a step forward.

@saintpaul9012

2 жыл бұрын

@@WEKS87 True!

Elon Musk Starship is no. 1

Its out of date before it launches if it does.

Nobody use gallons in the space industry. Use metric tonnes instead.

Elder Fox reveals what American (aka human kind) can achieve given time and the resource. Real miracles on the ground and in space make our lives more fulfilling, enjoyable, safer and longer. Thank you Elder Fox for the detailed narration of NASA's next big achievement.

@TONY19021965

2 жыл бұрын

The real miracle would be to better use $18 Billion to feed starving people, house the homeless, find cures/treatments for diseases, and provide medical care. No let's forsake the real need, and go to space, so we finally get rid of God.

@jerrysinclair3771

2 жыл бұрын

@@TONY19021965 Thank you for reading my post. So, you would put a half-million engineers and scientists who contribute much in taxes and donations to many great causes? Then we increase the unemployment roles with unemployable skills. Plus, many of the cures and treatments we benefit from were quantified in outer space. NASA's mission is to make life better for mankind, not worse. Also, it was Jesus who rebuked an Apostle when he said, "The poor you will always have with you. (Matthew 26:11).

@TONY19021965

2 жыл бұрын

@@jerrysinclair3771 Whatever makes you feel better buddy. No matter how you try to justify it, it does not cash-out the same. And you're right Jesus said that you would always the poor. But how does that justify spending $18 Billion (money we do not actually have) to go to the moon, AGAIN? To what end? Most scientists are either atheistic evolutionists, or theistic evolutionists; neither of which give a flip about what The Scriptures say. It's nice that you do, and I sincerely appreciate that, but your formula does not workout to fixing the afore mentioned ills. They have not in the past, and they won't now! These expenditures serve only to put the nation into further debt. Besides that if you believe the Bible, consider this: "The heaven, even the heavens, are the LORD'S: but the earth hath he given to the children of men." Psalms 115:16 How about we concentrate on doing what we can & what needs to be done right here on EARTH, the place that God actually gave to us to live on, and care for?

..... SLS really means Single-use Launch System. Don't see how this is any better than the Saturn 5 other than 18% more thrust. We are still throwing away everything but the boosters

@Jay-ho9io

2 жыл бұрын

We are not presently capable designing a system that is reusable for the distances that the SLS is expected to cross, and the masses it is expected to lift. It was never meant to be revolutionary, but is an iterative innovation.

Can you do face reveal

Yes after spending 15 billion dollars and 5 year late to launch I would think they could build a rocket SLS is a complete disaster 1 billion dollars for each launch . Space x will launch 150 tons of payload for a few million . SLS should be canceled and move on

One word... Starship

@louielouie6259

2 жыл бұрын

One word... meatloaf.

@godofthunder6259

2 жыл бұрын

@@louielouie6259 two words.. Im hungry

@godofthunder6259

2 жыл бұрын

@waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa juast wait another 2 weeks.. Ill be back at this thread...

@louielouie6259

2 жыл бұрын

@@godofthunder6259 Lol!

@TONY19021965

2 жыл бұрын

One word, NUTS!

100% obsolete

All that money to do again what was done 50 years ago....Whooopeeee!

@TONY19021965

2 жыл бұрын

BEST COMMENT YET!!

@TONY19021965

2 жыл бұрын

@waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Oh boy, lets go to the moon on a long term mission, where there are absolutely no viable resources to sustain human life whatsoever! Sounds like the stuff that kids say when the play "make believe", except it doesn't cost $18 Billion to play "make believe"! Are you people actual adults, living in the real world, with jobs, and families, and genuine responsibilities??🤔

@TONY19021965

2 жыл бұрын

@waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Yep, I'm just as stupid as you, pal! No one needs to re-spend that kind of money to develop 2 way RF microwave satellite enhanced communications networks. Communication, defensive, and atmospheric satellite development, deployment, and maintenance is not the humongous waste of money that going back to the moon (oh, that's right we've done that already, & didn't go back, because it is such a humongous waste of money!), or going to Mars is going to cost! As far Afghanistan & the Taliban is concerned; we were actually fighting for something substantial until Sippy-Cup Joey got into The Oval Office, showed his chicken butt to Moscow, and made kissy face with the Taliban! At least my conscience is clear, I did not vote for that idiot savant! So, no I'm not at all happy about that waste of money either, and I've made my grievances know about it, on the appropriate forums for those issues. But at least its initial intention was to fight to save human lives, and promote liberty, unlike revisiting the moon, or attempting to go to Mars! By the way, I so do love your screen name. It is so very appropriate, just saying..... TTFN.

why not put payloads on 2 Saturn's spending billions on sls. well space x is here no worries but billions lost

why build a rocket that is long and round? understand that you get in more fuel etc, but why not try to make a racket that is flat and round instead and has more space for passengers etc ?! its not impossible to build, I just think everyone is locked in that the function that a rocket has today is comfortable with it and we know how it works ...

@Jay-ho9io

2 жыл бұрын

The larger the rocket, the more absolute mass it has, the more fuel it has to have to escape gravity. After a particular point, the diminishing returns become so great that you cannot have enough fuel to get enough mass off the ground. While it is important to think outside the box, it is also important to understand that a great deal of very intelligent and very innovative people have been involved with spaceflight since the 50s And a great deal of what appears to be thinking outside of the box is simply coming up with an idea that has already been discarded after being fairly thoroughly explored.

This video proves the earth is flat

@TONY19021965

2 жыл бұрын

And little green men live on Mars too!

I'm having poor fellow human tears at the idea of $18 Billion to fly rockets with virtually no benefit, other then to prove that there is no God, while millions starve to death, are plaqued with diseases, and are homeless! Nice job guys. GO TEAM!

@ksnreddy2552

2 жыл бұрын

What will they achieve by showing no god. Are you a flerf?

@TONY19021965

2 жыл бұрын

@@ksnreddy2552 What do think that proving exclusively, if it were possible, that there is no God, will do for those who do not want to answer to Him? And what, exactly is a "flerf"? It does not seem to appear in any dictionary that I have looked for it in.