Stunning. I hope in my old age I can attain even 1% of the intellect the amazing Roger Penrose retains at 91.

I have listened to Penrose's lectures on so many topics related to physics, cosmology, consciousness, etc. where he articulates his theories and arguments that even most non-scientists can understand at least the essence of what he is presenting. We are all so fortunate to be living in an era where we have access to such fantastic presentations from leading authorities right in our homes

I love his lectures. It’s like he has so much knowledge that he struggles to get it all out within a confined time limit. Not to mention the transparencies always seem to be out of order which is even more charming. I wish I had him as a professor.

5 жыл бұрын

It s exactly the point! It s not an easy task to formulate this insights which are far beyond experience of audience and don t make it trivial and misleading. Even possibility to meet and discuss these insights with Roger could be privilege for me! Great man, able to step-out from mainstream theoretical thinking, still rooted in best possible insights of modern mathematics. In his eighties! Incredible...

@MadderMel

4 жыл бұрын

We all love Roger !!

@jameshoffman552

3 жыл бұрын

Penrose drawings are the best! Love how he draws the magnifying glass.

@brendawilliams8062

2 жыл бұрын

@ well said

Penrose is a legend and his conformal cyclic cosmology theory is very interesting

@vitalikavlashvili7739

3 жыл бұрын

How do you know it?

@jameshoffman552

3 жыл бұрын

@@vitalikavlashvili7739 - CCC is the only theory that makes sense, without introducing kludges like Inflation.

@dapdizzy

3 жыл бұрын

@@vitalikavlashvili7739 cab she just think so without knowing and thus consider it interesting as he claims it to be on his comment?

@phillynott2459

3 жыл бұрын

@@jameshoffman552 I agree. I don't think inflation happened. It doesn't give the energy required to generate the 1.21 Gigawatts necessary to explain the uniformity of the cosmos.

@phillynott2459

3 жыл бұрын

@@dapdizzy yes

Brilliant, a fascinating lecture delivered in Penrose's charmingly quirky, "absent minded professor" style.

@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885

4 жыл бұрын

He's also licensed to kill - or I mean he is one of 24 of the highest honor in England

I love his style of slides, this should be used more often in science and maybe even in scientific papers. Visualizations and the use of colors, for my brain at least, increase the rate of processing and understanding the information by so many times. Right now, when I'm looking for some new mathematical terms or explanations, I'm using image search first, before wikipedia.

Absolutely amazing . It absolutely blew my mind that so much could be said about dark matter particles .

I wonder what the PowerPoint-slideology experts and corporate identity operatives of my neoliberal institution would say about this presentation : ) Chapeau for the well-deserved Nobel prize, Sir Roger - and thanks for this lecture.

Roger Penrose is like Inception. Amazingly entertaining and I don't understand any of it.

Sir Roger Penrose is too brilliant to keep up with but all the more wonderful for it..!

What a gift to the world! Truly a beautiful and inspiring human being.

A most excellent powerpoint free presentation! Very interesting ideas, did not know about erebons.... wish them a bright future. I am not a theoretical physicist but have been bothered about the breakdown of QM into QFT on small scales and what happens to the cooled down old universe. It is a pleasing thought that perhaps the spacetime metric somehow breaks down doing away with the infinitely small big bang and the infinitely old expanded empty universe.

That man is 87 years old!

@YoutubSUCKZ

3 жыл бұрын

Imagine the speed of his brain at 30!

@jameshoffman552

3 жыл бұрын

The power of genius -- Penrose is as lucid as ever as he approaches 90, and so far ahead of the CW of cosmology.

Very interesting! Thank you for filming and uploading!

in fact if you got the two discussions about infinity here (conformal mapping and entropy maxing) you evidently see that infinity is transcendantal and now you can start reading Kant for a discussion about the issue and then Hegel to see how it is completed/rectified.take care of your health because we have a loong way but seemingly little time

yes it is all about the precision of clocks eveything else in this physcihs (ie this universe) depends on as he says around 21:40. how far can the precision of clock can go? he brilliantly sees it is given by planck and einstein equations and very tactfully suggests conformal mapping theory which means that anytime you can go as far as you want and the horizon is always there. excellent consolation for some engineer oriented sci-techboys.

Blah blah blah...Penrose begins at 6:37

@vanessacherche6393

6 жыл бұрын

thanks, introductions are necessary, but not on youtube :)

@alovelytime

5 жыл бұрын

lol

@PifflePrattle

5 жыл бұрын

Ty

@francessimmonds5784

4 жыл бұрын

Lol..wish I'd seen this comment before I started

@MadderMel

4 жыл бұрын

It was ok , I thought it was a nice introduction .

I love Penrose ! I don't have a clue what he's on about though !

@jameshoffman552

3 жыл бұрын

Conformal geometry sonds intimidating. But listen to Roger describe it in terms of the Escher drawings. Conformal mappings preserve angles, and details locally, allowing for stretching globally.

Fascinating. A master of arts whose intelligence transcends and crosses multiple sciences to humbly reach the minds of those who stop the clock and just pay attention

Lecture starts at 6:35

Thank you very much Penrose,Eu agradeco do fundo do meu coracao,muito obrigada pela informacao.Angola,Portugal.

for the discussion aorund 20:00 I might suggest planck time and plank space as the boundary which one can get as close as to that tenth dimension which is frequency that he mentioned. he is telling it all by the way. he is a magician.

I have a question. If the motion of star(sun) and planets are according to newtonian dynamics. It means there is no dark matter within our solar system. Then why we are trying to detect the so called DM particles on earth???

notice the examplewith clocks around 18:50. it is THE frequency , other universes with other frequencies,

Maybe galaxies end as a particle holding the strong force, which increases in strength with distance, but I'm sure nobody on earth knows how to fully address this possibility without knowing the details involved in describing a galaxy after its existence reaches its final outcome in our shared spacetime. I just think it's a strange coincidence that the largest objects in our universe have created the largest modern day mystery by showing similar behavior to the strongest force in nature. Yea, the force doesn't increase in the same proportions as the strong force, but it does seem to increase enough to remain constant with distance from the center, and it might be worth a shot to explore the possibility that galaxies might be the key to understanding how nucleons formed immediately after gravity broke the symmetry of the initial conditions that held one event that became our universe.

in the poincare group to which it belongs in special relativity is not the absoulte constant thing, it changes. that's why, he says, hawking radiation anyways, Sir Penrose is explaining it ALL from the perspective of materialism so much so that mass disappears ie you leave your body and get the first step into the realm of theology. this is an excellent resource and training for those who cant get to Hegel at their first attempt. others may enjoy. and the other may look for who is Sir Penrose and why he is telling these.

Quite adequate surroundings actually a ccc background, how very weird, with the very great and lovely Sir Roger Penrose.

@roniklinkhamer4031

5 жыл бұрын

In the very beginning only. Wrong observation of me, sorry.

@epajarjestys9981

3 жыл бұрын

@@roniklinkhamer4031 Sir Penrose hacking the universe.

@roniklinkhamer4031

3 жыл бұрын

@@epajarjestys9981 if that's true, I'll put my sunglasses on, so bright the future looks. How splendid he got the Nobelprize, finally.

20:40 mass equals frequency blows my mind.

Eye opener for me ☯️...

Superb.

Penrose is downtoearth physicist. Great!

@dapdizzy

3 жыл бұрын

In my view Penrose is one of those Mathematicians that genuinely see tacit aspects of reality in their everyday life.

Cosmologists worry about information being lost in black holes, and this might imply the possibility that information from a previous universe might be forwarded in the form of our dark matter.

Feel his pain when he says

I wondered if you put previous universes and future ones together it would look similar to a wave and then I wonder what frequency it would have and what information would be obtained by looking at the universe's in that simplistic way, but to do that we would need to know to a certain degree of accuracy at what point does the expanding universe reach it's maximum which would be the peak of the wave while at the point of collapse of the previous and beginning of the new universe would be a trough that would be our bigbang. It would at least give you the frequency at which universes are created, how long each universe exists for, but then what medium would the hypothetical wave exist in? and would it be effected in a similar way to light being redshifted by expanding spacetime? if so every universe that forms would exist for longer than previous ones and if not would the wave be constant, are there other types of them existing simultaneously in higher dimensional spacetime like the infinate photons in our universe and finally why does the 'hypothetical multiverse wave' exist? is it a sort of higher dimentional quantum of energy? Its at least cool to think about these thing's even if its not the right way of thinking about reality.

Roger Penrose, inventor of the triangle

did anyone else notice the weird interruption around 07.00? who asked him to study this issue?

Sir Roger Penrose: 1. he has talked about CCC a lot, in a lot of places. 2. it is his theory. 3. it might be a load of cobblers. Ian Clegg: 1. I have had a think about all this. 2. my own theory is as yet unformed. 3. until anything is proved for sure, I'm with Roger.

I thought the same thing about the early universe-the whole black hole thing…. lol. This is awesome. The only thing I question about his repeating universe scheme is how did it ALL get started. I get really frustrated when people just push the most relevant questions farther away without answering them. So I am doing it. I completely understand why he wants questions from young people. Wonder. Openness. The future. Loved this lecture. ❤️❤️❤️

I think we’re in a sea of dark matter and that all particles like photons and electrons are orbiting undetectable dark matter particles, explaining wave particle duality with their polarizable axial or helical apparent wave properties as they travel depending on the orientation of the orbit, explaining the double slit, uncertainty, etc. The amplitude of waves would be the orbit diameter of the particle and the wavelength would be its orbit rotation speed relative to travel speed. Everything in our universe from gluons to solar systems are in orbit with something and moving as apparent waves as they travel in our expanding universe, yet are particles, and so it seems like this would be the natural first (Occam’s) assumption, no? Does anyone know of any specific experiments, calculations, theories, etc that have disproved this possibility? Thx

@vanessacherche6393

6 жыл бұрын

i like the idea, there is some good idea out there like this one that will be accurate. need to figure out how to test, that's what separates the hypotheses from the theories.

@geoffreytylerpayne

6 жыл бұрын

how would that explain the double slit experiment? In that experiment, the particle seems to go through both slits at once when unmeasured, and one slit when measured (even retroactively) ...are you thinking of it like the dirac sea?

@sanjuansteve

6 жыл бұрын

This guy explains: "#WaveParticleDuality problem ...resolved with #VortexTheory?" kzread.info/dash/bejne/lKSLqMtrdKTQgcY.html

@geoffreytylerpayne

6 жыл бұрын

Interesting theory, but that would make dark matter not "matter." Your theory implies that dark matter travels with photos at the speed of light, correct? This would be too fast to account for way it clumps and orbits galaxies, unless all particles have a corresponding dark matter particle, but then we would observe more energy in the universe, and we are already trying to understand why there isn't less energy due to quantum theory.

@sanjuansteve

6 жыл бұрын

Isn't there believed to be some 30 times more dark matter in the universe than visible matter?

Permutter et al showed empirically that in the near-term, the universe started to accelerate its expansion. This seems entirely consistent with the erebon half life of 10^11 years. As erebons decay, their gravitational hold on galaxies would relax. Is this not evidence that Penrose is on to something?

Penrose's theory that dark matter is a kind of residue of the gravitational waves from the previous eon parallels my intuition that the phenomena attributed to dark matter are the product of very-long-wavelength gravity waves from the previous eon. The faster-than-expected rotation of spiral arm galaxies, for example, are caused by a standing wave vortex or whirlpool in the gravitation field imparting angular momentum to the galaxy's mass, and most evidently to the periphery.

How about conformal stretching - of a jacket?

Dark Matter should be called transparent matter that would be a better description

@dalibosch5028

5 жыл бұрын

Or dark gravity.

Brian Keating & Roger Penrose 🌌🌙🌠

This is a very good theory, but it needs a dual realm for symmetry -- it's probably a dipolar oscillation. One additional comment is that black holes don't destroy angular momentum. This is maintained, and is very fundamental. As a black hole gains mass, it gains more "bits" of quantized angular momentum, which translates to a finer specification of direction. Also, an expanding universe would suggest that our big "black holes" are actually something more like white holes. Let's wait and see if the stars around Sag-A are actually being spun up, or are being swallowed. Time will tell whether our galaxy is a pinwheel firework, or a consuming vortex. Finally, dark matter is becoming less and less relevant as much more regular, previously unseen matter is being discovered all the time. We should wait on speculating until we know how much normal matter we have.

@brendawilliams8062

2 жыл бұрын

Those theories and proofs from just listening to them are over knee deep in math. Interesting, but you have to be leaving the launch pad first. Lol

My idea of the origin of the universe is that matter was formed from energy from an infinite potential (by way of infinite regress) and the matter that was forced to exist coalesced into black holes around the universe along with the surrounding matter which resulted in gravity which slowed down the rate of time and shortened the measure of distance while stretching time and space dragging it into black holes causing the red shift and the apparent expansion more so in the past and causing the vacuum of space along with the fabric of limited time and distance where we are where physical things can take place such as the concatenation of living organisms by whatever was able to make and order living organisms, obviously not by matter itself which cannot ever make or order itself in any sense.

Aspect is key...eons are only detectable as an aspect which comes into being and disappears ...at the moment we are the aspect, detectors, and articulators of it...to a relative degree...aspect and relativity are intertwined... obviously

all he is saying starting from around 26:00 is: are we living the same lives over and over again? of do we have choices to make difference in each eaon? yes, he is discussing free-will on the side. and suggests that: if you agree with his mathematics, he will grant you free will.

the idea that the Universe cannot be a multiverse or that there cannot be parallel universes is just as ridiculous as thinking that our planet is the centre of the Universe.

If this world is closed then all blackholes should open to the same point. Otherwise it is open and you will not exist infinitely, which might make you doubt about certain things.

Why put the intros in? Starts at 6:38

It is all about gravitation he says because that entropi curve is asymptotic as implied by cosmic micrawave radiation errors and is in favor of physical existence as the material world he says. Gravitation, meaning mass. Mass is the most mystical determinant of the current universe and mass is the horizon in the bingbang and in the end of the universe. Yet mass is not stable as implied by special relativity in this world, he says.

Thankyou

Someone should work with Sir Roger to update slides, would be a wonderful experience.

@SantiagoArizti

2 жыл бұрын

3blue1brown should animate them

@phumgwatenagala6606

2 жыл бұрын

He has fun drawing these slides, he is choosing to do something fun and create rather than creating something impersonal and unoriginal. Good for him.

I think Sir Roger is on to something here.

I know he's right just based on that outfit. Damn homie.

@jimgraham6722

3 жыл бұрын

Presumably in far future those ultra massive black holes are guzzling prodigious amounts of space time containing vast quantities of dark energy, I wonder what happens when stuff rains down on the singularity, does it get indigestion and vomit everything back up.

What him say? JUST KIDDING! Very interesting of course!

What I understood is that for this world: God is the infinite projection of anything that might happen, (whatever you may imagine that means)i and is concrete and unchanging, this is as far as we can tell from this theory, God might be beyond that but not less than that. I mean, this is the current physically and mathematically plausable limit that human mind can approach God in this world any possibly in some close neighboring parallel worlds. Thanks Sir Penrose, I find your demarcation plausible.

Really like Laureate Doctor Professor Penrose, but he makes statements with the full forcefulness of law. For example, he says photons phase out and since they have no mass they also have no time. Aren’t the “old” photons older (measured in time) than the new production?

what date was this recorded?

@arthurc.clarkecenterforhum6745

6 жыл бұрын

January 19, 2018-updated in the description!

@EnginAtik

6 жыл бұрын

Also the computer’s date on the bottom right of the screen shows it.

@rebase

6 жыл бұрын

Depends on your frame of reference ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

@djtan3313

5 жыл бұрын

THAT is d question!

@randalmata100

5 жыл бұрын

January 19, 2018

It is very much question for me that the mass of black hole of our galaxy can not be so little (four milion times of the sun ) because with this mass of black hole , the mass of total galaxy can not be kept around it , specially with their centrifugal speed ???!!! Am I right ? Don't think it must check it over again ?

@ethandickson9490

9 ай бұрын

The whole galaxy pulls on itself and centres to the densest point, where the block hole is. As to why stars in the periphery don’t get flung out more often (particularly considering the observed speed) is one of the main reason dark matter is proposed

Sir. Penrose he reminds me Professor Cislaghi, Scuola Europa Milano and director Luchino Visconti,.... Milano North Italy Europe.

I tried for second time calculation of milky way's black holes mass from method of Mr. Newton I find it to be 4.380561×10 to the power 61 kg and if it is divided by mass of sun it would be 2.19 ×10 to the power 31 times of our sun . There must be some mistake in announcing to public 😇😇😇

@dradeel

6 ай бұрын

Have you tried again since your comment? Considering the mass of the entire Milky Way galaxy, stars and planets and all, is 6x10^42 kg, it seems obvious your math was wrong. The mass of Sagittarius A* is 4.3 million solar masses.

@amidaleahmad1324

6 ай бұрын

Here I see some diferent method that you are giving me the mass of stares of milky way but I am considering the speed of sun and centfigule force of the sun to be equale with Newton's law and from there I have reach to this figure . If you have different method I would be glad and appreciated to know from you . Again thanks for condideration .

nice

who else read this lecture as an extremely esoteric content? and notice the weird deride when he talks about Einstein wanting a stable universe?

It's pissing down with rain then !

Erebos is decidely Greek, the name is of IE origin and has nothing to do with Egypt: “in Homer, etc., the place of darkness between Earth and Hades, from Latin Erebus, from Greek Erebos, which is of unknown origin, perhaps from Semitic (compare Hebrew erebh "sunset, evening"), or from PIE *regw-es- "darkness" (source also of Sanskrit rajas "the atmosphere, thick air, mist, darkness;" Gothic rikwis "darkness").”

🖖 cool vid

the biggest trick is smoothing out the bigbang as he says. that is a lot of tiling but also is the only possible solution for finding a tiny miny way to approach God as close as possible without forgetting that you are still not God.

@osmangun2103

2 күн бұрын

it is a LOT of way, if you think about it, yani diyor ki kardeşlik; dünya dedikleri bir gölgeliktir, yani asıl olan çöldür ve o çöl öyle uzundur ki şimdilik yapabildiğim tek şey ancak bir sonra gölgeliğe giden yolu kestirmektir, öyleyse kafanı kaldır gölgelikten az sonra çıkacaksın, çöle odaklan ve hangi yoldan gideceğini düşün. öyle yatmak yok.

Use ECOSIA as your search engine. It plants tropical trees as you search the internet to stop climate change, Put its APP on your mobile, or make it default on your computer. Help it get to 1000,000,000 trees as soon as possible

Anyone after nobel prize?

@saniyatmushratlamim6596

3 жыл бұрын

meh

@tidakada7357

3 жыл бұрын

Nah I gave up on trying to win it years ago already

yes he is right. mathematically yes eaons approach correct at infinity, which with next mathematical trick (which he said cosmologists wouldnt like -good joke for his age-) is the same as in and out of a black hole. all we need is the resonance with the singularity of black hole which is as close as you can get near to what mass is, he suggests.

@osmangun2103

2 күн бұрын

that means get rid of mass and thus physical world as far as you can and approach masslessness, for the initiated. the unitiated first must find-identify himSelf and then the first.

@osmangun2103

2 күн бұрын

after all: what can you expect, if you dont know your self?

I don't understand, is the Universe flat like a cookie? I don't get it, if the Universe is "almost" spiracle then how the hell is it flat? Did the big bang "bang" in one direction? Only certain directions? Did it bang from the bottom? flat? Is it like a round piece of paper? Very thin?

@brendawilliams8062

2 жыл бұрын

A squared plus bsqured equals c squared. The math follows the rule of how a triangle is measured. There are other ways to measure a triangle as in ancient maths but they are mysterious. You have to master the triangle of your eons to master the math.

Unfortunately, all I hear when words like "extraordinary" and "special" are uttered in this lecture, is all the apologists jump out of their chairs and scream "GOD!! SEE?!" - without having any clue about what's shown here...(not that I have any better clue)

Shout out to Sabine's rude comments :)

yani diyor ki, kardeş diyor karadelikleri conformal strutcureda kütlesiz entityler olarak alan bir mapping tasarladım. kafana uyarsa evrenin başında ve sonunda bir karadelik tekilliği var, bu dediğim de sizin bingbangten sonra inflationary period oldu mu geyiğinize olumlu cevap veriyor, yani diyor hem başta hem sonda inflationary periodlu eoanlarla sonsuza diyor. iyi peki bu inflationary period meselesini her boyutta çözer mi? 9 tane uzay-zaman koordinatın her biri mevcut evrenden nerdeyse mükemmelen (ki bunun limiti maddenin limiti- o da einstein-planck tarafından verildi, alınıyor son kalan da bunları 10 boyutlu ve kapalı bir yüzey olarak kursun diye öneriyor.

@osmangun2103

2 күн бұрын

dinleyin hocayı çok acayip şeyler anlatıyor

so..cancel the elephants and turtles and imagine a segmented crinoid ...

@jameshoffman552

3 жыл бұрын

Hmmm, CCC does have its similar appearances to "Turtles, all the way down".

I wanna hangout with Sir Roger

[Big_Bang Theory's Incompleteness]: - continuing - Fourth, [Insufficiency of Evidence] Doppler effects and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) must not be the necessary evidence to support the Big_Bang theory. They may be those that are not inconsistent to explain the Big_Bang theory. The universe can be expanded in the process of suddenly increasing of the amount of total energy of the universe by the energy generated temporarily in various places, and the energy corresponding to the CMBR, despite the generation and disappearance of the new energy, may be maintained at the same level continuously as the average density of the background. (I am surprised that the absolute temperature value 2.725 of this background radiation is very close to the natural exponent (e) value widely used in science and engineering, and am confirming that it can be seen as the balanced value of energy viscous force and spreading force in vacuum or the reasonable density for circulating energy massing and scattering in space of the universe.) Fifth, [Irrationality of Infinite Inverse Estimation] the Big_Bang theory maintains that the universe was in a singular state in the beginning, constantly inversely estimating it based on the rate of expansion of the present universe and the composition ratio of the material atoms that make up the present universe. However, it may be difficult to estimate the entire process by applying it back to the end, focusing on the phenomenon currently observed. It may be unreasonable to say the initial state while applying the limited set of present evidence to the extreme, because the phenomena that are happening now may be one of several cycles that may be repeated, may be transient phenomena or phenomena occurring in a part of the universe, and may continue to be maintained as very stable titration phenomena. Sixth, [Inadequacy of a Single Process] the occurrence of the universe and its progress over time may not be a process. The rivers appear to be a single consistent line from the outside, and groups of clouds formed in the air can be seen as moving while water vapors change only in density, an outer boundary, and spatial location. They look like one beginning, one end, and one intermediate flow. However, practically, the river is the flowing process together with incoming and outgoing of many droplets. It is an overall shape of the sequence of water flowing that water flows from numerous fountains and valleys are combined and flowing water leaks into the ground and escapes in the vapor. The phenomena of the clouds are similar, and the strings and the continuity of life forms are similar. How can we assert that this great universe starts at the same time and progresses in one direction as a process? It can be a complex process in which energy is generated, aggregated, dispersed, and extinguished. Seventh, [Singularity Problem] the Big_Bang theory does not explain at all about the conditions the big bang took place, that is, who prepared so large amount of energy and so big energy density in the beginning (or how those were prepared) or why it broke at that time point. Stephen Hawking says that God does not need to be presupposed to explain the present state of the universe as the Big_Bang theory, but that the occurrence-extinction of the universe can be solved by the laws of physics. But he has not been able to give an answer on how the universe reached to the singularity state and how to deal with the infinitesimal-infinitude problems in physics. (You may refer for this that Roger Penrose, who paired up with Stephen Hawking and enthusiastically advocated the Big_Bang theory, recently introduced the cyclic universe as a solution to the singularity problem of infinitesimal size and infinite density and expanded it.) I take the seven above as proof that the Big_Bang theory cannot be a complete theory that explains the birth and progress of this universe. According to this theory, as the universe continues to expand acceleratedly, the energy density of the universe will continue to fade beyond the present value of background radiation, and the universe will eventually disappear. Including solving this problem, there is a steady state theory as a substitute for the Big_Bang theory. But note that there is no difference in the points that the theory also states that the energy that makes up the whole universe is constant and that the universe repeats explosion and bunching periodically and changes density as a process. The Big_Bang theory cannot solve the multiverse problem naturally. The idea that there is only our universe is very unnatural. The possibility that something is absolutely unique is not general, except for the totality. If there is one in the world of matter, it must be possible that there can be arbitrary numbers at any time. Inside the material world, it is natural that the laws between the condition and the result can be universally formulated and applied by the common properties of matter in the open state. But in other universes whose underlying energy has different basic properties, the mathematical expressions for the same laws and physical constants can be different. And if a universe is based on the energy that is generated and its density changes and disappears arbitrarily elsewhere, there can be any number of arbitrary sizes at any time.

go to 6.33 intro much to long

the biggest assumption (although has some evidence) is that entropi will never max, it is asymptotic for ever. See, that is the boundary of God, as also thought by Aristoteles.

I was sure this lecture was given in the U.S. thanks to the very dumb last question. 'do you believe in global warming?'

@ReesArchibald

5 жыл бұрын

Dude be a bit kinder. That was a woman asking on behalf of her 13 year old child who is unable to talk. Being 13 and in that audience is already pretty damn good! Shows an awesome mum and kid.

@robbie_

5 жыл бұрын

@@ReesArchibald So, let's look at the evidence: we have a mother who's coached her child to be extremely worried, scared, petrified about global warming and as a consequence she takes him to public talks so she can ask a completely irrelevant question about it on his behalf.

@ReesArchibald

5 жыл бұрын

Rob Inson where is the evidence she 'coached' her child about global warming? Pure assumption on your part. It was his question not her's.

A universe of temporal, eternally connected-solid superposition vanishing point singularity, and virtually empty spinfoam space, of differentially relative positioning here-now proportions, ..is a continuous contained environment of phase-states, ..modules of time duration phase-locked to the Universal singularity. So the phase diagrams shown are included in a single diagram of nested virtual timing loops-strings, time-spaced in infinite multidimensional connection. It's difficult to imagine in completeness because it's solid-fluid in constant motion, and a compound of primes and cofactors of time duration, ..phase-locked dimensional states constantly changing around integrated constants. We are stuck with analysing point portions along lines of piecemeal threads, wave-package bands of logical mathematical connection in the QM-TIME principle, in-form-ulation.

I think that Dark Matter are particles(actually electromagnetic waves) of the magnitudes of neutrinos, i.e.,of masses between 10^-35 to 10^-43 kilograms,and of wavelengths between 10^-7 to infinity meters. These cannot be detected or observed optically, being of frequencies lower than visible light range. However, the gravitational( actually electromagnetic interaction)effects on visible matter in their vicinity can be observed. Dark Energy are electromagnetic waves of even longer wavelengths and lower frequencies. Dark Matter and Dark Energy together comprise 96% of the universe, leaving only 4% which are of frequencies and wavelengths within the visible light range constituting the visible universe.

[The laws of energy conservation and entropy do not apply to the entire universe] The law of conservation of energy, which is that physicists assume that there is no generation-destruction of energy but only a transform of state in the isolated system with arbitrary boundaries and some error rate in a physical world, cannot be applied to the whole universe. (Understand that in the physical world you can never create a complete isolation system using energy or matter, just as we can never make an isolated area in the water with water or ice.) // The material is not a primitive, active, and permanent being to be self-generated or to keep existence forever. Material has somewhat active forces, such as universal gravity and electromagnetic force, and various laws created by them, depending on the properties of material itself, but they are only of very limited activity, not of activity of mental level in life, and moreover, never the 100% activity of the most primitive being, God. // Given the very limited activeness of this physical world, the questions of who created such enormous energy and why it was created only once as such amount and at that time, cannot be easily answered. Accordingly, from the characteristics of the physical world such as - finite • imperfect • always changing • temporary • relative • passive except for given property, it is reasonable that the underlying energy is generated at any time from a more active and original being, temporarily exists, and then vanishes. Therefore, it would be correct that the total amount of energy that makes up a universe is never fixed and continues to change with density or external boundary. // (The physical world opens to God, although it is closed on its own.) Fish living in large lakes or oceans cannot feel continuous substituting, increasing or decreasing of water by incoming-outgoing, spring-leaking or vaporing, but always feel that the same water just mixed and shaking while changing in temperature and purity, keeping always the same amount, though the density in the water remains the same all the time.) Of course, the law of entropy does not also hold unless the law of conservation is retained as energy is generated and extinguished all over the universe.

black hole effect on dark matter

Dark matter is the event horizon of the blackhole that we are in.

Copyight 2020 Wardell Lindsay Galaxies are Homopolar Motor Dark Energy =cP this drives the rotation. cP=cmV=ezI V=(e/m)(z/c)I=176Gx1.25uI V=220km/s ! Interspace electrons power the Galaxy/Homopolar Motor. Homopolar Motors are Wattmeter in American Homes!

The universe is made of mathematical tricks !?

@epajarjestys9981

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, it isn't.

dark matter should be called dark gravity

@epajarjestys9981

3 жыл бұрын

dank matter

CCC is missing more than string theories. Penrose blue shift problem is easy to solve. None of you calculated next over probalistic universe. You failed C*D when everything decays into photons and time losses meaning. Use that as a natural cutoff regime. Use the size of the universe when the last particle decays. Put the sister universe next to ours then rewind time to this time frame. C*D complete. Black holes are finite systems. Finite stuff goes in and finite life span. Same with Big bang. Finite system. Both have solution set's and similarities. Though completely different animals. Your missing boundary layers and censorship. Particle families in energy density regime's. Use Schwartzchild for particle mapping and time slices. Kerr for G-flows and hyper surfaces and quantum boundaries. R=0 has rational solutions and virtual QFT solutions with no infinites. Though large numbers. The universe as a secondary cutoff for black holes. The virtual infinites come from the time distortion factor. Eons theory missing fields and compression and solving other things right. Your C*D is incomplete and broken. Go back to black holes and fill in what you missed. Or have students do it for you. After filling in the layers. That shows how big bang inflation has to be non FLT in a vacuum. But can be FTL in mediums. 1st gen neutrinos causing polarization %. Quantum tunneling to a lower energy state. Hawking radiation back up solution. The predictability of where hawking radiation appears. The particle production in gravitational waves in a energy density regime. Calculating boltzmann time bombs. Einstein rules work fine when you look at what the math says and whats going on. Religions have contaminated good science as you and othrts like Mitchio coocoo and sean carol and such. No wonder so many are lost. Bad practices from teachers being passed on. Religious beliefs/delusions influencing science. I used to think human stupidity was infinite. But I assure you it is finite and has sets. Go back to black holes and finish solving for all of the finite system. Why go looking for aliens when humans are already so alien from each other.

I have a theory: dark energy condenses into dark matter , which in turn condenses into visible, ordinary matter:- hydrogen. My theory is supported by the astronomers' recent discovery of a "bridge" of hydrogen spanning the entire space between Andromeda and Triangulum.

CCC rocks!

Roger you are so disorganized. Why not use printed slides? I am sure if these diagram were better printed the whole thing would have been more convincing. The presentation was rushed towards the end which is a shame because it can explain so much that deserve proper consideration.

@phumgwatenagala6606

2 жыл бұрын

He does as he pleases. He probably doesn’t like to sit down and fiddle on a computer to make something bland that’s the same as everyone else’s. He can sit down and be creative to draw these things. He isn’t going to do powerpoints when he enjoys this better, it’s more fun this way and if you don’t like it then who cares, he isn’t here for people’s enjoyment. Go for it roger, fair play to you.

Is empty space white or black? I'm guessing white

@bizo237

6 жыл бұрын

When? Grey question.

Why is no one willing to accept dream work as a phenomenon that embraces quantum physics and reality. Maybe take a look at the collapsed wave theory? 👋 I had a dream outlying my neurosis in my mid-20s. It has taken me 45 years to unravel the meaning of that dream. I have resolved the origin of the neurosis, obtained full consciousness, and proven that life fulfills its deterministic path - at least it can be proven if one looks in the proper places. It's now 2023. I hope your organization is thriving and growing. What an honor to have, Dr. Penrose amongst you. I hope he lives a very, very long life. He, indeed, is in a dream come true 👍 ❤️

CCC is to establishment cosmology as @Tesla is to Legacy Auto.

1:11:58 - ageist much hey?

Thank you for continuing this work linking imagination and science. While Sir Roger is brilliant I must disagree with his cosmology. Every moment , every plank moment in the universe a neutron falls at the speed of light from being a neutron star to being a black hole, and at that same moment that same neutron falls from being a neutron star to being a single neutron emerging at c in deep cosmic void where the energy density is lowest and it then decays into primordial Hydrogen creating charge and thus creating space. The same space that was lost when it fell into the black hole. A continuous flow. The cmb is the very distorted glow of these neutron to proton decomposition from the edge of visible time. Remember that our perception is trapped in a bubble of time because of the curve of space caused by Lambda. No point in space can see beyond this curve this hyperbolic curve of gravity and the vacuum energy.

@austinlevan5885

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao what point are you even responding to? You’ve hardly proven anything other than your inability to avoid compound sentences.

@brendawilliams8062

Жыл бұрын

We all can think with Sir Penrose. He’s calming and it’s good for contemplation of your own mind’s view of an interesting topic.

Oh my god people who we would never know or see who are simply fortunate to be able to announce someone of value really get deluded about their worth. The only reason we are listening to you is to hear you say and here is.........so please stop dragging it out. Six minutes? Really?