That “ I’m used to what 6 inches looks like” joke flew over peoples heads. 😂

@natureredux1957

16 күн бұрын

How so, The FroKnows, that is like his Standard Joke since like forever. He should get in contact with yTuber Sarah-n-Tuned because both of them have been Stuck on the very same JOKE.

@davidsr9719

15 күн бұрын

Used to what 6 inches looks like….😂😂😂😂

Really appreciate how objective & honest your reviews continue to be. Especially with characteristics that may be subjective. It never feels like I’m watching a commercial (except for the Fro Pack segments 😛)

What about rf full frame- ahhhh 😭 Edit: I think it’s great how Canon finally let sigma make some rf glass and I think this is a good start. I am just hoping the rf full frame glass comes soon because I just picked up the R6 Mii within the past year and I’ve been looking for some more affordable (unadapted) zooms. Like the holy trinity zooms (16-35mm f/2.8, 24-70mm f/2.8, 70-200mm f/2.8)

@77dris

16 күн бұрын

Adapt. I have mostly Sigma Art lenses on the R6 II and they are fantastic. The Sigma 50 1.4 is 99% as sharp as the RF 1.2 version, costs 1/3 the price, and actually focuses 2x faster than the native Canon RF 50s (both of them). And even with the adapter it's more compact than the RF .. and you still get full 12/40 fps.

@kaydawgy1999

16 күн бұрын

It's coming..... In 2032

@zegzbrutal

16 күн бұрын

@@kaydawgy1999 stop complaining, Sony E took more than Canon RF-S for the first AF 3rd party. For 2 years is nothing, photography isn't about chasing latest gear.

@kaydawgy1999

16 күн бұрын

@@zegzbrutal I'm not complaining. I'm just letting you know it's coming in 2032

@GiuseppeFontana.

16 күн бұрын

😭😭😭😭

I'm hanging out for a Sigma 150-600mm for RF. My 2 favourite lens are the sigma 135mm f1.8 and 40mm f1.4. Absolutely amazing image quality.

I love how the AF works on Canon, I have a Nikon Z5 and I'd love to have an AF like that one! Great job Jared.

Looks good as a walk around lens on the R7. Nice and compact. The only RF lens I have thus far is a TTArtisan 35mm F0.9 - which is of course manual. I have been picking up EF L lenses for a steal and although they are a bit more bulky, the quality is just next level. EF 100-400 L is ii, EF 500 F4 is mk1 - and a ef-s 10-22 all for under$2600 altogether. EF 24-70 F2.8 L vs this lens? You know, with my speedbooster that EF “26-77 F2.0” still looks more tempting… just more bulky

Buenos Aires doesn’t sleep just to watch your video!

Would this lens work on a Canon R8 full frame for video if shooting in APSC mode?

@kevindiaz3459

16 күн бұрын

Probably, it will with other crop sensor lenses. However, the cropped modes will probably be the only modes available as the camera will grey out the non-crop modes when an APS-C lens is attached. Can't say for sure until they are available and people can try it out. In the past, crop lenses from Sigma could be used on a full frame and didn't change anything, but those cameras were not intended to have crop lenses on them so that is likely why there was no crop mode. I feel like it's more likely to be the other way, where the camera is made to be able to use crop lenses and it auto detects them and places the camera into crop mode, limiting what you can do with video modes.

@zegzbrutal

16 күн бұрын

The lens image circle is too small for FF use. I tried with Sony a1(ofc the e mount variant). This lens can be a good video lens for R8 despite the crop

@Mathieu_Matheow_Benoit

16 күн бұрын

Yes but you will be down to about 9.5MP in crop mode

@petrpohnan875

14 күн бұрын

Find the answer in your R8's user manual.

saving up to buy this one for my R10! super happy with the price!

That would be a great combo with a R10 body-only

Going to wait for those sweet full frame Art lenses.

@marijam1924

13 күн бұрын

did they said anything about making those in near future?

@thegrumpycanadian274

13 күн бұрын

@@marijam1924 not yet. But at least this is a move forward.

I have adapted Tokina 11-16 2.8 on my R7 and am very happy with the results.

Bro… damn good shots. Seriously ❤

Thank you!!

When length is a problem, consider converting to metric for that instant 2.5 X multiplier bonus.

599 USD WOW Just wow im buying it right away now and the r7 too i buy them both just now ty Jared

Pre-ordered this for my R7 yesterday when I saw the 7/11 release date. For events I'll use my EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II, but this will replace my EF nifty-fifty for walk-around use. (Sold the RF-S 18-150 kit lens last year to help pay for the 24-70 - only bought the kit because the body wasn't being shipped by itself in any real quantity two years ago.)

10/10 Content Bro

The Thats what she said killed me the 'im used to what 6 inches looks like' ended me 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

not surprised this one is pretty good sigmas old 17-50 dc os hsm is excellent, still got mine

@cousinvinny5066

12 күн бұрын

Same here. Also, the old one has IS and looks to have the same if not better IQ!

@lliamarden8560

12 күн бұрын

I have that too and was wondering how much of an upgrade this would be?

@catrinh4

4 күн бұрын

Do you guys using on mirrorless? I want to buy 10 20mm dc but lil afraid to not work well

That looks like a really nice kit lens.

Cannot wait for them to actually start releasing for the full frame bodies. Need an alternative for their 70-200 2.8 Sport.

@77dris

16 күн бұрын

Get the EF 70-200 2.8 L IS III. I got that and use it adapted on the R6 II for hockey and it NEVER misses and is 99% as sharp as the RF version. But it cost me $1500 less (new) than the RF version.

@user-oo7dw4qw4b

16 күн бұрын

@@77dris was planning on getting one of those but it's still quite pricey for me rn. Was deciding whether I should just get a new Sigma 70-200 2.8 Sport or a used EF 70-200 2.8 II since they're pretty similar in price points from where I'm at. Was leaning on the used EF since it's slightly lighter and smaller than what Sigma offers but damn that Canon RF version is so tiny but way over my budget right now haha.

@justinburley8659

16 күн бұрын

I'm looking to get their DSLR version which is very competitive with modern mirrorless, but it's very heavy.

This would be a great lens for taking to places like Disneyland while using your R10. Not too heavy, nice and small, nice and versatile! If I wasn't going with my R5 and a 50MM f/1.2 this time I would be getting this lens today! But I have a few shots that require that monster. But next year? This could be coming with me on my R7!

@starbuk138

15 күн бұрын

I'm curious about someone who plans their Disneyworld shots! What do you have planned?!

@swistedfilms

15 күн бұрын

@@starbuk138 Well, there's all the normal things: friends and family, the castle, the "Partners" statue, little details like the graves while waiting in line for Haunted Mansion, that sort of thing. But specifically I'm taking the faster prime into the line at Star Tours in order to get a clear shot of C3P0 and R2D2. 3P0 moves and it's a low light situation so I need a fast lens and something that can handle a higher ISO so I can get a shutter speed of at least 1/200th. Now, I don't need that beast in order to get shots of the costumed characters like Snow White. An f/2.8 would do just fine for that. But I'll have it so I'll use it! There's also the stationary props in Galaxy's Edge like the Millennium Falcon and the costumed characters there. When I go to Fantasy Land I'll lean on the railing at the Tea Cups and do a shutter drag to get some motion shots, and do my best to do the same at the merry-go-round. There's a shop on Main Street that sells crystal knick knacks and I like to go in there and get shots of those with really shallow depth of field. And because it's shiny crystal you get a LOT of bokeh balls! I can't wait to see what it looks like with an f/1.2! Are you going there soon? I'm getting the Genie+ service so the park photographers can take photos of me and my family.

I bought Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 EX HSM for my 90D last year second and it's outstanding. Probably just tweaked it a little to fit the RF mount, which is a brilliant move and not costly

@cousinvinny5066

12 күн бұрын

I think this is based on other versions (i.e. for different mirrorless systems) of it and not the old Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM which was released over 10+ years ago. In any case, I still have the latter and will continue to use it with an EF-RF adapter since this new one has no IS and the IQ improvement doesn't look to be significant (if any). That being said, the new one is much lighter and more compact (and doesn't need an adapter).

@willemdebeer2507

12 күн бұрын

@@cousinvinny5066 definitely agree with you that is smaller (the latest version), but for the price difference. Will also stick with the old version and buy the EF adapter when I upgrade. That being said most new cameras have IBIS whereas back when the first version of the 17-50mm was released many cameras did not have IBIS. 500D, 600D, 70D ext

@cousinvinny5066

12 күн бұрын

@@willemdebeer2507 Currently, for Canon EOS R system, the R7 is the only APS-C body with IBIS. R100, R50, and R10 are all without IBIS unfortunately ☹️

Honestly, I would prefer a retrain of the "18-35 1.8 ART", but this is is a nice start. In fact, with advancements in tech I can see them making it a 1.4

I have this lens for my Sony ZV-E10 and I'm really happy with it. Small and a good all-rounder. For my R6II I have no choice and have to buy RF lenses or use the adapter. But the adapter makes the old lenses bigger and it's annoying to have to use it in addition... I'm not a pro and I want cheaper options for my loving camera. I want to use a native 24-70 or 70-200, but not for over 2k what I have to pay for canon lenses!

I use this lens on my X-H2, its fantastic!!!

I'm currently using an adapted EF-S 17-55 f2.8 on my R7, and they are a great combo for low light event shooting. While the size and weight of this lens are definitely appealing, I'm not sure that's enough. I'd be giving up IS and 6mm (x 1.6) of zoom range. Change my mind.

@cousinvinny5066

12 күн бұрын

I don't have the EF-S 17-55mm f2.8. However, I have the Sigma old 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM that I am using with an adapter and agree with you for the most part in light of the lack of IS with this new Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 lens.

Seems like a good lens for video!

Would it be any good on an R8 set a smaller sensor ?

I’d like to add another request for a serious comparison between this lens and the old sigma 17-50 2.8. Like others, I use this lens adapted, and could use sober advice on whether it’s worth switching. Thanks!

I have it too! Love this lens or my Canon R50!

Hey Jared...please upload the comparison video of nikon z6iii vs sony m4 vs r6 mark ii

Can you do a comparison with the Sigma EF-S 18-50mm f2.8 using an adapter? I would like to know how much difference between the legacy Sigma lens vs the new RF mount one.

@cousinvinny5066

12 күн бұрын

Pretty please, Jared!

@catrinh4

4 күн бұрын

Please want to see how sigma dc works for R (apsc) line

Hi Jared. I have a r7 for events, weddings and concerts. I use a ef 24-105f4, would this lens be better for my r7 instead of 24-105f4? In terms of focus my 24-105 dont miss.

@zegzbrutal

8 күн бұрын

The reach will be shorter, so it really depends if you are use the tele or wide end more.

I would love to see a teleconverter that can be used with the RF 70-200s

Ha! Fro said “it’s not me using the R3 or something better…”, something better? Do you have the R1 with you? I wonder… 😁 All best!

@silbay

14 күн бұрын

Gee a lot of the other big Canon names have "slipped" and implied something over the last several weeks, so I vote yes he does

Please test : Does it force 1.6 crop on fullframe body RP, R6, R8 like Canon's RF-S and EF-S ? Or can you shoot FF with vignetting and select other aspect ratio? Please test and confirm?

Hey Jared, do you happen to have any online course we could benefit from?

What about the old 17-55 f2.8? It's clearly THE contender and if you already have the adapter it is a cheaper (albeit heavier) alternative. Now is it worth upgrading to for people like me that still use the 17-55? It's still my best lens and I can't justify upgrading just for the weight savings. 600 is still not cheap for such a restrained range

@stotes57

15 күн бұрын

This is what I want to know too. I love the 17-55 on my R7. And it has IS too.

@cousinvinny5066

12 күн бұрын

I don't have the EF-S 17-55mm f2.8. However, I have the Sigma old 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM (a more affordable alternative to the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8) that I am using with an adapter and tend to agree with you especially in light of the lack of IS with this new Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 lens.

@buckeroonii

9 күн бұрын

the OS is terrible on my old 17-50mm with the R7. smaller, no adapter, better stability (is it?!) and will be brand new (my old sigma is pretty rough these days), I'm in!

Hmmm R3 or something even better. Jared is playing with the R1 or the R5ii. Nice code!!

good I would gladly have this + primes on dx

Game changer for Canon. The Canon R100 with the Sigma 18-50mm is a great setup for a great price.

@zegzbrutal

8 күн бұрын

Yes. Even though some enthusiasts on the Internet will get crazy by hearing the name of R100😂

really want to see this vs the sigma 17-50 2.8 for the efs mount

It looks really cool my only question is, am i doing the math bad. A full frame lens like the rf 100-500 on a cropped sensor would be the equivalent of a 160-800 mm, but this lens is already an rf-s lens, so it is aimed at this mount. At full frame, technically it would be 18-50/1.6= 11-31 no, if i count correctly.

I am saving up to get this sigma lens to pair with my R100 camera. I've seen nothing but positive reviews of this Sigma lens.

What about a comparison between this lens and the infamous EF SIgma 18-35 1.8 Art lens?

How strong is the vignetting if you use this lens at full frame? Will it be suitable for shooting with Canon R5 RAW 5.2k with crop factor?

@zegzbrutal

8 күн бұрын

From my experience with the e mount version, it's good to use

Finally third party for Canon. Wonder what the future holds for full frame world… Sigma 50mm and 85mm 1.2 would be fantastic, maybe even 1.0 or am i dreaming. 😅

On full frame guys just crop the sensor to 1:1 and you can use the APSC lenses, I have a Ttartisan 25mm and works perfectly.

Hey Jared, where's Kitty at?? Haven't seen them in a while 😢 I hope they're all right. Love your videos, bro. Keep up the great work. 🤙🏽

I have this lens for Sony to carry with me during times where I won't bring my full frame kit, like when I'm working. It can stay in the truck and I don't worry as much about it

Do you have access to the 10-18mm f/2.8 in RF mount? I have the X-mount version on my FUJI X-H2 and want to get it for my partner's R50.

@zegzbrutal

8 күн бұрын

The Sigma 10-18 RF will be out around Q3. If Tamron 11-20 RF-S comes out earlier than Sigma, you can get that

Whats it like filming video?

Canon - I’d upgrade to another mirrorless FF but I’ve waited long enough for lenses - hello L MOUNT ALLIANCE.

Can this work with my canon R6 Mark II

This is nice RF lens for crop sensor but seeing that I'm currently using the Canon EF-S 17-55 2.8 on my R7 that I picked up for $200, I don't see any reason to change over. I'm waiting to see the other RF lenses from sigma and Tamron though

@cousinvinny5066

12 күн бұрын

Agree. (I don't have the Canon EF-S 17-55 f2.8 but am using the Sigma old 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM (a more affordable alternative to the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8) with an EF-RF adapter on my R7.)

Basically 29-80 4.5 ff equivalent.. not bad!

I'd love to see some of the Sigma Art series lenses on Nikon Z mount, without any stupid limits.

Those of you with an R10 would you say having EF mount L lens would be a way to go until you can afford the RF mount L lens?

@arrowhawk6324

15 күн бұрын

That's what I'm wondering. I recently got an R10 and use my old ef-s 17-55mm f/2.8. To me this lens sounds like Sigma's version.

@RaheelZahir

15 күн бұрын

@@arrowhawk6324 I have an EF 24-105 f/4 L lens from canon I’ve take a few pics so far not a lot of time but from what it seems it’s doing a better job than my t7i with kit lens so I don’t know if EF L lens can be substituted for RF L lens then I’m totally on board

@arrowhawk6324

15 күн бұрын

@@RaheelZahir I believe there are adapters out there that go from RF lens to EF mount.

@RaheelZahir

15 күн бұрын

@@arrowhawk6324 yup i have it for my R10 and the lens

How is it different from canon 17-55 2.8 Is Usm? If I have the canon, is it worth the change to the sigma for the R7? Is a comparison between these two possible?

@HwL01

16 күн бұрын

It is smaller, lighter, does not need an adapter, a newer architecture in AF mechanism, better light controls (Less CA, less flare), and like most Sigma lenses it is sharper.

@zegzbrutal

16 күн бұрын

that EF-S 17-55 is old, Sigma wins anyday

@JakeAussie-bs3lx

6 күн бұрын

​@@HwL01no IS is a shame though

Do you think we will see RF lenses from Sigma with IS in the future?

What that external monitor you have on that R7?

@stepheneckert4006

11 күн бұрын

Atomos Ninja V

Nah 😅 that L-mount alliance wasn't done properly... put some motivation into it Jared ( as a teacher at school would say)

Do you think it’s worth buying for Canon RP?

@zegzbrutal

7 күн бұрын

No, APS-C lens is not feasible on full-frame

That would be good for Z mount DX.

Whats the name of the gear hes using at the game the one that has a screen of what hes shooting at?

@stepheneckert4006

11 күн бұрын

Atomos Ninja V hdmi recorder

I will settle for a 15-45 f/4, so long as it's compact(ish) and lightweight. Until then, my new 'travel camera' - Canon R10 - will stay at home. Come on Canon. What else is a small, crop-sensor camera for if it isn't travel? Mind you, for giggles I took the R10 with me to shoot a motorsport event recently and it was pretty damn good at it. So much so I left the 7D2 in the car.

I also wear a magen David, ❤

Can I buy a Canon R8 and this Lens?

The bit that I struggle to understand is why a lens designed for crop sensor cameras such as the Sigma DC range is, would be affected by that 1.6 crop factor. I understand that say, an RF50 on an R7 gives you that 1.6x factor, but this particular lens? I'd love for someone to explain to us newbies how a crop sensor lens on an APS-C body still has the crop factor? Why call it an 18-50? Why not a 29-80 lens?

@flbjr7024

16 күн бұрын

"Second class citizens don't get measurements for them" - Fullframes

@jordhall

16 күн бұрын

Field of view is a characteristic of the sensor, not the lens. The lens is an 18-50mm whether or not it's on a full frame or crop camera. However, the image circle for this lens doesn't cover the full sensor of a full frame camera, so the crop factor allows you to understand the equivalent focal length in 35mm terms. Again, crop factor is a characteristic of the sensor so the lens focal length doesn't change just because it's designed for crop sensors. Hope that helps.

@chiranjiviacharya13

16 күн бұрын

I have always asked that question myself. But i guess it is to make it easier to distinguish between the lenses of full frame and apsc. Because there were some 28-300 for full frame also. And when you see 18mm-xmm, you can tell that it isn't for full frame. If it said 29-80, you might get confused if it is for full frame or apsc.

@Hodenkat

16 күн бұрын

Exactly! Why would we still need to do the crop factor calculation on a lens specifically designed for a Canon APS-C (X1.6)? Even more messed up is the R7 will show you're at 18mm when you are all the way zoomed out. So is it lying? Is it 18mm or is it really 29?

@jordhall

16 күн бұрын

@@Hodenkat as I mentioned, it's not the lens that has a different focal length on a crop body. The focal length is the same no matter the sensor. The field of view, however, changes based on the crop factor of the sensor. So on an R5, the lens is indeed an 18-50mm. Factoring in the crop factor for crop lenses has always been a thing and always will be for consistency.

I wish a lens maker would come out with an affordable-ish 14-40mm F2.0 zoom for crop bodies. 18mm is not wide enough, and F2.8 is not fast enough.

thinking about trading in my sigma ef lens 18-35mm art lens + 50mm rf lens for this - the art lens is very very nice but man way to bulky and heavy and then save up for the 70-200mm rf lens =/

But how is it on a camera like the R50 or R100?

@zegzbrutal

8 күн бұрын

Simply lovely

Come on Sigma/Canon, get your asses together and give the people Full Frame lenses.

did anyone used it yet on full frame? If so, how is it? Is there a lot of vignette?

"R3, or something even better" does it mean what I think?

Ordered mine at 1am just as this video popped up on my phone.

Sony A-Mount had a 16-50 2.8 that was super, super sharp and incredibly versatile.

P.S. I see so many "experts" announcing/pretending that this is , quote, "the very first officially licenced lens for RF mount" .. or "the very first 3rd party RF lens " ... blablabla... Hello ??? FACT : Yes , IF you really need autofocus. Yes, they are "licenced" . Yes some of them have IS ... But there have been many 3rd party RF-mount lenses out there , licenced or not, for fullframe and aps-c , from various producers , for several years now.... I have a few of them... all in RF mount : 50/0.95 , 35/0.95 , 25/0.95 , 28/1.2 , 10/2.8 , 7.5/2.0 .... . No AF. No IS. No L, No Zoom. Just plain beautiful manual basic prime but ultrafast lenses. And VERY affordable... I LOVE Canon cameras, I have a dozen of them and I prefer them for their colour science and menu and other stuff... but they are not always best with lenses... YES I have many Canon lenses but I also have and still will buy other brands for lenses... open your mind and dare to explore options..

I have this for my a6700. It’s very sharp if you stop down to 5.6 or 6.3.

Canon knows that the RF-S lenses are not selling, that’s why the allowed signa to make these. We aren’t going to see full frame third party lenses till canon release all their first party lenses….. probably another 2 years

I wouldn't normally call a kit-style lens for APS-C bodies an important lens, but a Sigma on a Canon RF mount body is a step in the right direction! Thanks for the review, Jared!

Wondering how this will look on an R5

@froknowsphoto

16 күн бұрын

Bad

@aaronjonellhall1937

16 күн бұрын

@@froknowsphoto even in crop mode you think so?

I'm still confused as to why an APS-C lens for Canon would be marked as 18-50 when the crop factor would make it a 28.8 to 80mm? Even the internal display shows zoom focal lengths as what they are marked on the lens. Why are we still doing these crop factor calculations? Why not make it 11.25mm to 31.25mm and then call it an 18-50? So messed up. I have both the R7 and R6-ii so buying APS-C lenses doesn't make sense for me. I want to be able to share lenses between the two. Nice option even at that price. It's a f/2.8!

@froknowsphoto

16 күн бұрын

Simple, people think in full frame terms. No one things in oh, this is an 18mm. Cause it’s not.

Umm I am a bit confused. Since this lens is DC for crop sensor Canon RF mount cameras, why does it have a 1.5x crop? Shouldn’t it still be 18-50 mm on the R7 as it was designed for crop sensors? I get that full frame lenses on crop sensor cameras have a 1.5x crop.

@jordhall

16 күн бұрын

Field of view is a characteristic of the sensor, not the lens. The lens is an 18-50mm whether or not it's on a full frame or crop camera. However, the image circle for this lens doesn't cover the full sensor of a full frame camera, so the crop factor allows you to understand the equivalent focal length in 35mm terms. Again, crop factor is a characteristic of the sensor so the lens focal length doesn't change just because it's designed for crop sensors. Hope that helps.

@okaro6595

16 күн бұрын

The crop is the property of the sensor. All lenses are marked with their actual focal lengths.

@kamezu

15 күн бұрын

⁠@@jordhallDoes it mean that with this lens on a crop sensor body at 18mm the field of view will not be equivalent to that of 18mm with a full frame lens on a full frame body? I had the impression that if I use a lens that is made specifically for crop sensor cameras (meaning it doesn’t cover the full 35mm sensor on full frame) on an APSC body like the R7 at a certain focal length, the FOV at this focal length will be same as that of a full frame lens on a full frame camera. Is this incorrect? I get that if I use a lens designed for crop sensors on a full frame camera, the lack of sensor area coverage results in the 1.5x crop (same with exceeding sensor coverage when using full frame glass on crop sensor bodies)

@jordhall

15 күн бұрын

@@kamezu see how complicated it gets when you try to make all these exceptions? It's very easy. For every lens, the focal length is the same no matter what camera you put it on. The field of view or full frame equivalent focal length depends on the crop factor of the sensor. 18mm is 18mm no matter what. You use the crop factor to understand the field of view for that camera specifically.

I have this lens in e mount for my sony A6600, and it is a cracking little lens. I also own a canon R7 which I use for sports, motor sports, airshows, and wildlife using big EF telephone zooms. However if I want close up shots or want to do portrait I have to take my A6600 with me as well just because of the lens. Best example of this is the zoo which I take 2 cameras with different lens on because canon being profit hungry shites do not make a decent walk about lens for their RF APS-C cameras, thanks canon.

i hope they let sigma make RF Art lenses

Nice hint he's trialling the R1. "on an R3 or better"

2:57 nah bro thats 8 inch

Something even better from r3 is r1? )))))

These small apsc lenses on large-mount cameras look so awkward. Could be a deal breaker for some.

@mavfan1

16 күн бұрын

Only a fool would care

3:37 "R3, or something even better...?" Mhm, what would be better than the R3 in the current Canon lineup? MAYBE an R1? sus...😂

woah

Viltrox 27 & 75 when?

Sigma 18-35 ART VS Sigma 18-50 DC DN

Sony for sure creating a mess for themselves. Posing limits very anti competitive. Neat little lens Sigma

bruh i just bought the canon ef 17-55 no way

❤❤❤❤

Ahhhhh, why does the GEAR don't matter crowd always hang out at every Canon Release.