Sigma fp vs Bmpcc 4k

Фильм және анимация

Sigma fp vs bmpcc 4k, bmpcc 4k review, bmpcc 4k footage, bmppc 4k review, bmpcc 4k why i sold, bmpcc 4k for beginners, best camera for beginner, bmpcc 4k raw. ump12k, bmpcc 4k braw, bmpcc 4k slow motion, bmpcc 4k vs arri alexa
bmpcc 4k, bmpcc 4k review, bmpcc 4k footage, bmppc 4k review, bmpcc 4k why i sold, bmpcc 4k for beginners, best camera for beginner, bmpcc 4k raw. ump12k, bmpcc 4k braw, bmpcc 4k slow motion, bmpcc 4k vs arri alexa vs sigma fp
pocket 4k vs sigma fp
#sigmafp
#bmpcc4k
jsfilmz
Filipino Filmmaker
Pinoy Filmmaker
Pinoy KZreadr
#jsfilmz
Learn Unreal Engine 4 for filmmaking from scratch!!
Here is another way you can support the channel! Check the description on the list of topics i covered.
sellfy.com/jsfilmz/p/learn-un...
Buy my course from Artstation
www.artstation.com/a/4594804
How to make a movie in Unreal Engine 5 Beginners Edition Sellfy Link:
fpvltjxd.sellfy.store/p/how-t...
How to make a movie in Unreal Engine 5 Beginners Edition Artstation Link:
www.artstation.com/a/7481092
Udemy Link
www.udemy.com/course/how-to-c...
Check out My Linktree for more:linktr.ee/jsfilmz

Пікірлер: 76

  • @Jsfilmz
    @Jsfilmz4 жыл бұрын

    Download link: drive.google.com/open?id=1HjxhVPf-XLe3BwzAN7cP_C_Vd0KpYS8M Sigma fp review: kzread.info/dash/bejne/mI6Gr7OBeKyzgbQ.html

  • @svyat_kap

    @svyat_kap

    4 жыл бұрын

    Parrot Anafi + DJI Osmo ACtion

  • @vlcthefish

    @vlcthefish

    4 жыл бұрын

    Sigma FP vs Bmpcc 6K??

  • @mikemorris3430

    @mikemorris3430

    4 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the review and for sharing some footage. I'm very impressed by the FP. Did you end up keeping it?

  • @fastcars3483

    @fastcars3483

    4 жыл бұрын

    JSFILMZ thank you

  • @mordechaicayson4287

    @mordechaicayson4287

    3 жыл бұрын

    Pro tip : you can watch series at kaldroStream. I've been using it for watching loads of movies recently.

  • @johnwick884
    @johnwick8843 жыл бұрын

    Bra take the mic a little bit to the side....it looks weird when you cover 40% of your face 😅

  • @chitaranjankhuman2692

    @chitaranjankhuman2692

    2 жыл бұрын

    🤣🤣🤣🤣 I felt the same

  • @innstikk
    @innstikk4 жыл бұрын

    I found I preferred the Sigma fp and then I bought a Davinci Resolve 16 license :-) I have two BMPCCs from before so these two companies are my favourites

  • @LWJCarroll
    @LWJCarroll4 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the dl video file....good to be able to have a look etc......as I hope to be able to buy the Sigma FP soon so I get the stills as well.....Laurie

  • @misterdeity
    @misterdeity4 жыл бұрын

    Love the new Bain look!

  • @bobspez
    @bobspez2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for the review and download of cinema dng files. On my older PC Davinci Resolve 16 easily and quickly converted the cinema dng files to 4K .mp4. I noticed there was no audio with the cinema dng files. Does the fp produce a wav. file for audio like the bmpcc does?

  • @Shiznaft1
    @Shiznaft14 жыл бұрын

    Both LP and M4/3 both can be adapted easily.

  • @daanhocks5850
    @daanhocks58503 жыл бұрын

    RAW = RAW and a sensor is linear. a flat LOG profile is something added downstream. So you can't give points to Bmpcc because it has flat profile.. The RAW from the sigma is simply RAW, you can make it Log / Aces / rec709 whatever you want..

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    3 жыл бұрын

    but sigma dont have their own log profile so why should they get a point?Bmd, arri, red have made their own log profile specific to their sensors and they shouldnt get credit vs someone who didnt? im not understanding your logic

  • @daanhocks5850

    @daanhocks5850

    3 жыл бұрын

    JSFILMZ that’s definitely true! I thought you were dismissing the raw as inferior to the log profile of the bmpcc. And that is just scientifically untrue.

  • @bedenegative6450

    @bedenegative6450

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Jsfilmz it doesn't need a log profile... it is raw video. In resolve you just select whatever flat profile you want. You can even use bmpcc 4k as the log profile. It's in the raw tab

  • @DrWNoLs

    @DrWNoLs

    Жыл бұрын

    @@bedenegative6450 Log curves need to be made for the sensor though. It is true that raw has all the same info, but without the software work of making a log that is right for the dynamic range, and then a lut to properly unpack it, it will be a real disadvantage. Even for an ACES workflow, you need proper IDTs that the sigma doesn't have any specific settings for.

  • @bedenegative6450

    @bedenegative6450

    Жыл бұрын

    @@DrWNoLs yea that's true. Though if the curves are sorted out it can be applied retrospectively. I've found the sigma to be very akward. But I am enjoying it.... not sure if I'll sell it

  • @muhammad_dng
    @muhammad_dng4 жыл бұрын

    My dude the sigma looks green as hell in low light, as compared to the pocket which looks pretty normal.

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    4 жыл бұрын

    yes but you can correct those thats why i mentioned if were talking about lowlight as far as seeing in the dark sigma wins. color science p4k wins

  • @MrNoipe

    @MrNoipe

    4 жыл бұрын

    the video creator doesn't know what he's talking about

  • @voradorlinux

    @voradorlinux

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@MrNoipe care to share details/reasons for the basis of that statement? really appreciate it. cheers!

  • @aybee5908
    @aybee59084 жыл бұрын

    Is DaVinci rsolve studio a feature? The colour of the sigma FP looks realllyyy greenish. A mft mount is for sure more flexible when it comes to adapting lenses.

  • @anthonyzeedirector9969

    @anthonyzeedirector9969

    3 жыл бұрын

    Download the raw files. I’ve matched bmpcc and sigma fp easily. Bmpcc has terrible shadows though.

  • @aybee5908
    @aybee59083 жыл бұрын

    Agree. I´ve seen other footage and I have to say it`s pleasing, if you avoid the post sharpening (which is really ugly) and use 12 bit DNG, which causes monster data size. If I used that Cam, I would buy a BM video assist and record ext in BRaw. In that price range, you have to compare it with the BMPCC 6K.

  • @DrWNoLs

    @DrWNoLs

    Жыл бұрын

    the BRAW is very soft on the sigma FP. The blackmagic 6k is significantly sharper because the Sigma BRAW is line skipped big time.

  • @alexdmitriiev
    @alexdmitriiev4 жыл бұрын

    Funny thing that Sigma’s 1080p looks more detailed than 4K From BMCPC

  • @LarsSteenhoff
    @LarsSteenhoff4 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the footage, you know you can import the sigma raw files in resolve with the blackmagic film profile ? If you want to have a flat image out of the box.

  • @punkrachmaninoff

    @punkrachmaninoff

    4 жыл бұрын

    ooh... that shade!

  • @LarsSteenhoff

    @LarsSteenhoff

    4 жыл бұрын

    But I still think importing as rec709 and grading it from there is the better way

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    4 жыл бұрын

    lol of course. thats why i said u can convert it in post to flat.i would use CST to convert instead of just using bmd film though

  • @LarsSteenhoff

    @LarsSteenhoff

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Jsfilmz Any tips on how this CSt workflow works?

  • @FrankieTheOne
    @FrankieTheOne3 жыл бұрын

    bro are you comparing 1080p raw from the fp to 4k from pocket4k??

  • @rajendrabiswas
    @rajendrabiswas Жыл бұрын

    Bothe cameras have good video but black magic can maybe take in my canon ef Len’s

  • @MrLambda48
    @MrLambda484 жыл бұрын

    Its kinda hilarious when you talk about how much sharper the Sigma FP is but the footage of the BMPCC4K looks clearly sharper.

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    4 жыл бұрын

    ur probably looking at the 1080p scaled to 4k. those will be obviously softer but download the files i gave youll see. the sigma is sharp and vivid

  • @MrLambda48

    @MrLambda48

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Jsfilmz The footage arround 3:55-4:00

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@MrLambda48 got cha yea thats the depth of field since it is full frame the dof is thin. the focus point in this shot is the building all the way in the back so the foreground is gonna be out of focus u can see it better with the cndg vs braw file

  • @MrNoipe

    @MrNoipe

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Jsfilmz lmao why didn't you set the apertures to be the same?

  • @paradisefilmslanka

    @paradisefilmslanka

    3 жыл бұрын

    Is it possible to reduce the sharpening on the Sigma? I felt it's too sharp for my taste.

  • @ankera7460
    @ankera74603 жыл бұрын

    nice!

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the visit

  • @Stihl_OK
    @Stihl_OK4 жыл бұрын

    Please tell me the clamp model for the 15mm tube on your tilt cage.

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    4 жыл бұрын

    tilta one bro check out their website i cant link for some reason its made by tilta for the p4k cage

  • @hawkmoon7930
    @hawkmoon7930 Жыл бұрын

    4:35 didnt Sigma add this in firmware update?

  • @sebastian_schanz
    @sebastian_schanz4 жыл бұрын

    5:28 What? I dont think you handled this one right... FullHD should look much sharper on my FullHD screen at home, unless you didn't mess with the focus. Thanks for the comparison though.

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    4 жыл бұрын

    yea no bro focus was on point 120 fullhd really takes a hit on quality compared to native 4k of the pocket ur gonna see the difference

  • @very9000
    @very90004 жыл бұрын

    Hi, tell me, what lens for the initial version to buy for the Blackmagic 6K, so that, of course, not very expensive, but also of high quality? 🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    4 жыл бұрын

    ive had the sigma art 18-35mm 1.8 since 2014

  • @very9000

    @very9000

    4 жыл бұрын

    JSFILMZ thanks 🙏

  • @filmmassa
    @filmmassa4 жыл бұрын

    Sorry but I can’t shake the feeling that you should have had a Bane voice for this video...

  • @bmefilms6879
    @bmefilms68794 жыл бұрын

    Pocket 4k wins!

  • @user-zm3fg4sw3l
    @user-zm3fg4sw3l4 жыл бұрын

    Put the video on the Davinci editing station. I liked the quality of the video from Sigma FP more. This is purely my vision, because in the second chamber I see a lot of soap, although the pictures are very close and only the pros can see the differences.

  • @lomwist2038
    @lomwist20384 жыл бұрын

    original bmpcc still better than 4k and sigma fp... time passes by...

  • @sergioknuf

    @sergioknuf

    Жыл бұрын

    Naw! FP is better!

  • @lukeoldknow6116
    @lukeoldknow61164 жыл бұрын

    I havent used the sigma but from this review and a little bit of Google it seems to me like the BMPCC4K as a video camera wins hands down. I say video camera because no one is buying the pocket for stills so it's irrelevant comparing them (I can take stills on a canon xf305 but why would you). The pocket has the better colour science, better dynamic range, better frame rates, more connectivity options, pro audio connector with phantom power and shoots BRAW which is a dream to work with. I would also argue that a m43 mount is more versatile and because of the smaller chip size it allows for speedboosters as well as straight adapters. While the low light shots might be brighter and cleaner out of the sigma they do have a colour cast and less dynamic range and resolve does a great job of cleaning up the braw footage. The pocket can also be powered by vmount or anything really between 20v and 7.2v which makes it very easy to find external power options. As for additional options it ships with resolve, has shooting modes for anamorphic lenses, stores and uses LUTS, has false colour (not sure if the sigma does) and can be matched with much higher end blackmagic cameras in a production pathway. It just seems a clear winner to me. There is also the price and if you were to compare the closest offering from blackmagic to the sigma it would be the pocket 6k, which I don't think there would be any debate to which is the better video camera.

  • @quinnvictor1058
    @quinnvictor10582 ай бұрын

    I know im a bit late to the game but I strongly disagree with your take on the footage from the sigma fp. A test was done on the sigma fp sensor itself and it has better color accuracy than the Blackmagic Ursa mini even! The way it renders skin tones is incredible, I totally disagree with the sharpness, I just shot a short film with the fp and the image looked nearly filmlike with the way the image wasn't too sharp but still had loads of detail. Speaking of which, the way the sigma retains details in surfaces and textures, makes them look non-existent on the bmpcc 4k. The sigma fp is also a full frame camera meaning you get a full 36mm by 24mm sensor which gives bigger boke and a much wider field of view regardless of the lens. Also not to mention CinemaDNG is the industry standard recording format specifically because you can do ANYTHING with the footage when it comes to color grading, you even get more flexibility and options with your footage in the raw tab in davinci with the sigma. I mean people use the fp as a b cam to arri alexas! Besides input options, touch screen, frame rates, and some rolling shutter, the fp is just better hands down. Oh and one other thing, from all the footage I have ever seen shot on the black magic, there is so much chromatic aberration its honestly distracting. Now keep in mind I have mostly seen this on the pocket 6k so it may be different.

  • @nikilragav
    @nikilragav3 жыл бұрын

    San antonio :))

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    3 жыл бұрын

    Nikil Ragav nope

  • @isart3757
    @isart37574 жыл бұрын

    p 4k still better

  • @kimdicentalevankim7023
    @kimdicentalevankim70234 жыл бұрын

    I can t see your face. I see a microphone

  • @Jsfilmz

    @Jsfilmz

    4 жыл бұрын

    hahahah its a good thing bro im gettin fat. I rather give you guys nice crisp audio than a fat face lol

  • @kimdicentalevankim7023

    @kimdicentalevankim7023

    4 жыл бұрын

    JSFILMZ 😂

  • @escapemetracks
    @escapemetracks4 жыл бұрын

    the sigma footages looks like smartphone

  • @Kurtiskurtical

    @Kurtiskurtical

    4 жыл бұрын

    Probably because you’re watching it on a smartphone. Watch DSLR Shooters review. It singlehandedly changed my whole opinion on the FP.

  • @idontwantahandlewhymustidothis
    @idontwantahandlewhymustidothis4 жыл бұрын

    The sigma looks like mud

  • @Sam-bn7jk
    @Sam-bn7jk8 ай бұрын

    better dynamic range, better color science, flat profile, almost half the price, blackmagic wins again everything.

  • @quinnvictor1058

    @quinnvictor1058

    2 ай бұрын

    A test was done on the sigma fp sensor itself and it has better color accuracy than the Blackmagic Ursa mini even! The way it renders skin tones is incredible, I totally disagree with the sharpness, I just shot a short film with the fp and the image looked nearly filmlike with the way the image wasn't too sharp but still had loads of detail. Speaking of which, the way the sigma retains details in surfaces and textures, makes them look non-existent on the bmpcc 4k. The sigma fp is also a full frame camera meaning you get a full 36mm by 24mm sensor which gives bigger boke and a much wider field of view regardless of the lens. Also not to mention CinemaDNG is the industry standard recording format specifically because you can do ANYTHING with the footage when it comes to color grading, you even get more flexibility and options with your footage in the raw tab in davinci with the sigma. I mean people use the fp as a b cam to arri alexas! Besides input options, touch screen, frame rates, and some rolling shutter, the fp is just better hands down. Oh and one other thing, from all the footage I have ever seen shot on the black magic, there is so much chromatic aberration its honestly distracting. Now keep in mind I have mostly seen this on the pocket 6k so it may be different.

  • @Sam-bn7jk

    @Sam-bn7jk

    2 ай бұрын

    @@quinnvictor1058 after some considerations i'm also thinking about purchasing one for myself, too bad is getting old and Sigma apparently not following up with new models creating a proper cinema camera line

Келесі