Dee and Dum in the 1933 version are the stuff of nightmares.

@mr.mcmeme2638

3 жыл бұрын

They look like one of the monsters from “little nightmares”

@IBM-vw4fv

2 жыл бұрын

Search up 1933 Humpty Dumpty since he was in the film but not the video

@nathancruz9172

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed, they’re.

@kazuma_matata1707

2 жыл бұрын

@@mr.mcmeme2638 you mean the twin chefs?

@videogamelover2006

2 жыл бұрын

So is the Cheshire Cat

wtf, I didn't know there was an old live action version

@buckdancer8916

2 жыл бұрын

Several starting 1903

@shippslouco4759

2 жыл бұрын

Sim, mas a original do filme de 1951 foi o live action que aconteceu somente para os produtores, com Kathryn Beaumont interpretando a Alice

@stabadaisy2

2 жыл бұрын

Buck Dancer yep first adaption was 1903, first ‘full length’ adaption was 1915.

@videogamelover2006

2 жыл бұрын

Same

@matthewfarmer336

2 жыл бұрын

Ya there was

I've seen all of them. 1931, 1953, 1988, 2009, 2010, and all the newer ones after that with Johnny Depp as Mad Hatter. They're all pretty cool in their own way

@darreylhenderson702

3 жыл бұрын

Don't forget the 90's Disney Channel show "Adventures in Wonderland'

@kendra6000

3 жыл бұрын

What about the one that was made in 2016

@Munchausen45

3 жыл бұрын

Don’t forget the 1999 version! I feel visually it’s more faithful to the novels and includes more characters from Through the Looking Glass. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_in_Wonderland_(1999_film)

@buffysummers5828

3 жыл бұрын

The 1985 one with the giant Jabberwocky puppet will always be my favorite.

@nironwing8897

3 жыл бұрын

2010 is the best

Interesting how Disney's Alice character is so similar in attitude to the 33 version. Also what stands out is how iconic the Disney music is compared to the earlier one. So many great little themes.

@WitchKing-Of-Angmar

2 жыл бұрын

The 1951 music.

@belebbb

2 жыл бұрын

It is like Disney made it on purpose, the cartoon version of the live action film. Now they are doing the live actions of the cartoons. But this adaption is better and more faithful to the “original” than the modern ones 😂

@cynthiakeller6149

Жыл бұрын

The 1933 one is the most faithful. The Disney one is sanitized

@GageTheMatewielGurl

Жыл бұрын

Not really since Alice seems pretty different in the 1933 version

@summerxforever

10 ай бұрын

@@GageTheMatewielGurl0:49 they did the same position

Fun Fact: One actor who made it into both of these versions was Sterling Holloway, who played the Chesire cat in '51 and the Frog footman in '33 even though that isn't in this video.

1933 seems like it was the Avatar of it's era. So many practical effects done so right so early in cinema.

@davidmartinez-fe3zr

2 жыл бұрын

Wizard of Oz was only 6 years later.

The rabbit in 1933 is just a furry.

@pepijn1539

3 жыл бұрын

shut. up.

@fargokatie

3 жыл бұрын

@@pepijn1539 say that again or you will get the fist

@haziqhakim5995

27 күн бұрын

He's also a furry in the 1903 verison.

I didn't know that movies in 30's had fascinating visual effects for its era

@AcmeRacing

2 жыл бұрын

Check out what Buster Keaton was doing in the 20s in Sherlock Jr.

I like both. But black and white movies absolutely have my heart, they're fascinating to watch.

@Iera_Thaumaturgy

2 жыл бұрын

Same

1933 was clearly a huge inspiration for D artists in 1951. Same with 1946 La Belle et la Bete french film for 1991.

@MisterMoncivais

2 жыл бұрын

"Inspiration" 😂

In the 33’ one i love how the bottle says not poison like ah yes I’ll drink this mystery liquid that wants me to trust it’s not poison 😂

@scotpens

2 жыл бұрын

It's a visual shorthand for Alice's inner thoughts in the book: It was all very well to say “Drink Me,” but the wise little Alice was not going to do that in a hurry. “No, I ’ll look first,” she said, “and see whether it’s marked ‘poison’ or not.” For she had read several nice little stories about children who had got burnt, and eaten up by wild beasts, and other unpleasant things, all because they would not remember the simple rules their friends had taught them, such as, that a red-hot poker will burn you if you hold it too long; and that if you cut your finger very deeply with a knife, it usually bleeds; and she had never forgotten that, if you drink much from a bottle marked “poison,” it is almost certain to disagree with you sooner or later.

1951 of course! I was pretty Suprised to see that the 1933 one for the Walrus and the Carpenter was animated....and pretty darker then the Disney one.

@victorbjorgman2002

3 жыл бұрын

Also was Animated by Harman-Ising.

Both versions are good imo and I loved how the live action versions from 1933 and 1915 had costumes that look very similar to the ones in the original novel. My personal favorite is the 1955 and 2010 remakes.

The 1933 version is- nightmare fuel. Still amazing though. The combination of animation and real life is ok but- man those special affects seemed like something that wouldn’t have been available until the 40s. Ok but the caterpillar saying "WHO ARE YOU-" in the 33 version genuinely terrified me.

@MBM1117727

2 жыл бұрын

Even in the 20s some movies had pretty amazing special effects. Check out Ben Hurr from 1925.

@WillowSerpine

2 жыл бұрын

The caterpillar, and EVERY creatures/people in this movie are truly terrifying !

Bro, the 1933 one is fucking trippy as hell

@brandonspain12345

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe like the book it's based on...

@rosalyncarnes7037

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

I woke up one night when I was a kid and the tv was on amc and the 33’ version was on. That was creepiest movie I’ve seen and it was made for kids?!?

I definitely like the older and spookier versions best! Way more enchanting and closer to the actual story! Most def prefer the 1933 version!

Why is Alice always so calm when she’s literally falling down a hole leading to what, the middle of the Earth? Likeee-💀💀💀

@thewkovacs316

8 ай бұрын

dodson went out of his way to make alice a marysue

@ThW5

5 ай бұрын

Because she is dreaming.

@haziqhakim5995

27 күн бұрын

She's more calm in the 1933 Verison.

1951 is pure magical.

@bobbyflay2234

2 жыл бұрын

It's all so beautiful to look at too. Amazing,fluid animation

@gambler942

2 жыл бұрын

What about 1933

@angeloma4666

2 жыл бұрын

@@gambler942 a bad trip in a good way

@NEEECOOO570

2 жыл бұрын

Yep

The 1985 2-part made-for-TV movie of Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass is arguably the best adaptation ever made.

In many parts I prefer the 1933 version, such as the "Drink me, not poison" part. Hahaha. I've always wondered how Alicia could be trusted to drink that without knowing if it was poisonous or something, now it makes more sense.

@ejay1118

2 жыл бұрын

In the book, she thinks to look for a label marked "poison," because if one drinks from a bottle marked "poison," it's bound to disagree with one sooner or later. In Disney's version, she actually says this out loud.

1933 special effects seemed ahead of their time

@mattkennedy6115

2 жыл бұрын

The whole movie is triptastic nightmare fuel but I applaud the studio for doing their best with the technology that was available at the time

1933's Cheshire Cat is so cool looking!!!! I'd love to have one that looks just like him...

@ScionStorm1

2 жыл бұрын

Makes me think of American McGee's Alice.

@scotpens

2 жыл бұрын

In the 1966 Hanna-Barbera "hip" animated version, the Cheshire Cat was voiced by Sammy Davis Jr.!

1933 version is a masterpiece.

@PedroHenrique-xz4rs

Жыл бұрын

Sim

Charlotte Henry who played Alice also played Bo-Peep in the Laurel and Hardy masterpiece - March of the Wooden Soldiers. Wonderful actress!

@TheAnubis57

2 жыл бұрын

Yes it was a pleasant surprise to to her 2 wonderful fantasy movies.

O de 1933 é um verdadeiro pesadelo e o de 1951 é um verdadeiro clássico da Disney!

Demasiadas secuencias fílmicas idénticas a la versión de 1933 en la película de 1951, debió haber puesto en los créditos el nombre de Norman McCleod porque no es una adaptación del libro de Lewis Carrol lo que hizo Disney, sino una versión animada de la película de 1933.

@michellelopez7880

2 жыл бұрын

¡¡No sabía eso!!, waaa que buen comentario aclaratorio

@El1000Toritos

2 жыл бұрын

@@michellelopez7880 No creo la verdad

Hmm, never noticed how Lewis Carroll's name is misspelled in the title card of the Disney version. Surprised no one has fixed that.

@SlapstickGenius23

2 жыл бұрын

It’s a funny old typo.

@MrParkerman6

2 жыл бұрын

*Misspelt.

@agerard6297

2 жыл бұрын

The DVD commentary notes this and digitally adds the L.

I love the 1951 version, best movie ever but I’m pretty sure I’m the only person in the world who likes ‘33

My jaw genuinely dropped in horror at the sight of tweedle dee and tweedle dum. Idc if this was 90, 100, or 1000 years ago, who would approve of this ghastly rendition? Who I ask?

The 1933 version looks SUPER CREEPY! Total NIGHTMARE FUEL!

@izzatfatima442

4 ай бұрын

Watch 1903 and 1915 version

During the making of Alice in wonderland (1933). Producer 1: Hey, the director we hired just quit some weeks ago and we can not find any replacement. Producer 2: Don't worry, I know someone who can help us, he is known in the industry as H.P. Lovecraft. Thus, Alice in Wonderland (1933) was born 😂😂😂

the twins give me the creeps

@friskydreemurre6516

3 жыл бұрын

Same- and it was supposed to be for children?

Interesting how.much structure Disney lifted from the 33 version. Dee and Dum were never in the original Wonderland book, but were in Through The Looking Glass.

@SlapstickGenius23

2 жыл бұрын

They’re both ensemble dark horses in many adaptations of both books.

@TerrickTerran

2 жыл бұрын

when Disney was doing the movie, he told his people to use through the looking glass as well though they only ended up using Dee and Dum and Walrus and The Carpenter.

The 1933 version is terrifying 😳

1951 was the one I watched as a child it was my favorite❤️

the 1933 version is more trippy and surealistic.

I can't decide if that flamingo in 1933 was a real, live one or a real dead one and that scares me...

@dukep9750

2 жыл бұрын

I think they use both. Plus rubber ones.

The Tweedles will now invade my nightmares.

1951 best

1933's best Alice film ever.

@She.lovesGod

3 жыл бұрын

Nah I like the 1951

@fargokatie

3 жыл бұрын

@@She.lovesGod me too.

Ummm I love the 1951 movie but 1933 looks incredibly interesting

you have to wonder if Disney just used the imagery from the 1933 version, it's so similar

People complain about no originality and that all they can do is remakes but they've been doing it for almost 100 years.

I remember this movie and it's on Disney plus but it's my first favorite Disney movie along with Mary Poppins. I read this book and it's also a live action movie on Disney plus.

Gran trabajo! Saludos desde Argentina! 🇦🇷💙🤍

The old live action Alice in wonderland was released in 1933, Walt Disney Alice in wonderland was released in 1951,Alice Through a looking glass was released in 1998,the game called American McGee's Alice was released in 2000 and new live action of Alice in wonderland was released in 2010,Alice madness returns was released in 2011 and the last one Alice Through the looking glass THE NEW ONE was released in 2016.

51 is better in my opinion. The first one I actually saw was the Hello Kitty one, in 1993, but I watched it when I was like 5 - 7, then I saw the 1951, out I was on KZread, and the first scene I saw was the doorknobs scene and the scene where Alice flooded the room with her tears.

@ScrewCRGMymomrocks1997

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe I should add the massive gigantic nuclear explosion sound effects to it.

Pete’s Dragon( 1977 and 2016) Side by Side Comparison

1933 cat is my sleep paralysis demon

2:16 Growing and smal but 1951 disney, version best

I’ve seen some Alice in Wonderland Versions ,1903,1910,1933,1951,2010 1951 is actually really beautiful 1933 is a nightmare but I still love it 1903 is only 10 minutes long so I can’t rank it (😅) 2010 is different but I love it as much as 1951

That's pretty impressive vfx for a film from 1933.

I didn’t know this existed! Omg I gotta watch the 1933 version!

I didn't even know the 1933 one existed.

The Disney version is good, but being more family friendly it is no where near as striking and surreal as the 1933 version, i've always prefered the original. Folk tales are meant to be dark

Cheshire cat is creepy in both versions

2:15 That Growing effect was really good for the 30s

극장판 이상한 나라의 앨리스의 대모험 (1933) VS. 극장판 이상한 나라의 앨리스의 대모험 (1951)

Re turbio la película del 33 😐

@sergioosorio5115

3 жыл бұрын

es lo especial de la de 1933

@bibianabedolla9168

3 жыл бұрын

De echo el creador era un pedofilo

@el_mismisimo_sr.x

3 жыл бұрын

@@qp9613 Se llama Norman Z. Mcleod, pero no estoy seguro de si era un pedofilo

@hamishmacfleetwood5229

2 жыл бұрын

@@el_mismisimo_sr.x he was talking about Lewis Carroll author of Alice’s Adventures Under Ground manuscript and the Alice books 📚 Alice’s adventures in Wonderland and through the looking glass and what Alice found there and the nursery Alice a shortened version of Alice’s adventures in wonderland with things explained by the author ✍️

@El1000Toritos

2 жыл бұрын

@@el_mismisimo_sr.x no no se refiere a Norman se refiere a Lewis Carroll

"NOT poison" how convincing

if they made a new version of that story today Alice would be black and a lesbian. the oscar insured 😂

どっちも可愛いわ

Omg didn’t know Alice had more adaptations I thought only Pinocchio did WHAT XD Probably because I’m a Pinocchio fan due to my pfp but still XD I love Alice In Wonderland so much and never knew this help.. XD

@DisneyFanatic2364

2 жыл бұрын

I mean it's a popular story that is public domain, same as Pinocchio.

@haziqhakim5995

Ай бұрын

I mean is a popular story. What did u expect?

I haven't read all 422 comments, but must comment that both versions owe a lot to Sir John Tenniel's original illustrations. New illustrations are out there, but a lot of us grew up with Tenniel. He also penned cartoons for the magazine Punch.

It's cool to see this. I have seen them before, but I actually grew up with the 1985 version. The actress who plays Alice and I are 2 days apart in real life! I remember my teacher made a little quiz for us after the 2 day TV movie aired, and then we read Alice in Wonderland in the classroom! Those were fun times! You know, I wonder if teachers today do projects like that-it makes learning fun! In fact, my high school history teacher was just as creative. In 1989, we did a report on social studies using Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire" as a reference. I probably wouldn't have retained the info half as well if it didn't become a fun project to learn with a catchy new tune and relating it to our studies

Wish i could watch the full movie to see how scary it is.

@supervixen404

2 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure it’s on here somewhere

The 193x one is terrifying

I didn’t know this existed but wow 🤩 the graphics are far way more realistic than today’s stupid CGI 😱 for 1933 it looks timeless

THEY USED A REAL FLAMINGO FOR THE CROQUET?!?!

Geez the oyster thing, I forgot how dark that was

the cheshire cat looks like something out of Pet Semetary....

8:05 the 1933 version..imagine seeing THAT as a kid! Scary as hell!!

10:45 The End A Paramount Picture A Universal Release A Walt Disney Production Made in Hollywood, U.S.A. Distributed by Universal Pictures and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.

Alice in Wonderland (1933/1949/1951/1955/1966/1972/1973/1982/1983/1985/1986/1998/1999) side-by-side comparison

Esta pelicula de 1933 parece una pesadilla y la pelicula de Disney de 1951 es una animación muy magica

My favourite was the musical version with Fiona Fullerton as Alice, Michael Crawford as the White Rabbit, and a cast of many more distinguished British celebrities

@TheMouseAvenger

2 жыл бұрын

And Peter Sellers as the March Hare! ^_^

I will concede that Disney's version had the more memorable musical score and some dashes of visual brilliance, but overall, the 1933 version is my favorite. As a sidebar, I haven't seen anyone mention the brilliant, but sadly neglected, 1972 version with Fiona Fullerton as Alice.

for the 30’s the 1933 one isn’t bad, some of the make-up is off putting to say the least, but not bad for the times.

1933 is different than the 1951 film, it’s because the drink in the 1933 makes her grow while the 1951 makes her small, and the cookies in the 1933 makes her small while the 1951 makes her grow

@kiddo7627

2 жыл бұрын

I noticed that as well. In every adaptation I’ve seen, and I’ve seen a lot adaptations, the Drink would shrink Alice while the Food would make her grow (Except for the Rabbit’s carrots in the Disney version which shrunk her for some reason)

Tops is the book of course. Then the Disney cartoon Then the 1985 and 1998 miniseries versions. "Drink Me Not Poison". That's exactly what a poisoner WOULD write on a bottle! The animated movie and the 1985 versions are the only ones that get it right. The Queen of Hearts IS NOT The Red Queen. They are two separate characters.

There is also a version from 1903 if anyone is curious

Alice did not have to listen to her history lesson at all. Her sister made a mistake by teaching her a history lesson during summer vacation. Alice had a very good and sweet time bonding with Dinah and sleeping with her together while she was dreaming about Wonderland.

Damn the live action one looks creepy

We can do anything while working with each other...

1933 is my favourite but yeah poor flamingos however it was the time back then can’t blame ‘em

Both of them are nightmare fuel in my book

Surprisingly few differances.

Well this only makes me more interested in the 1933 version!

i didn't know there was a movie that disney's alice in wonderland was inspirade/based on... I thought they made everything based directly from the book, i'm actually kinda surprised... Btw, movies from this age didn't use CGI much, so most of the characters just look like something straight from my nightmares edit: i just find out there's another one from 1903. LIKE... THAT'S EVEN MORE TERIYFYING, search that up, the images are just creepy

@ejay1118

2 жыл бұрын

As they didn't have "computers" at all, they couldn't have CGI, now could they? They would sometimes use a black screen the way we use a green screen today to superimpose the character over some other background. But for the most part, it was "practical" effects or nothing at all.

In other versions except Walt Disney where Alice enters a kitchen to a cooks mad commotion and just when she thought she liberated a crying infant from there the baby gradually turns into a pig. What will Lewis Carol say?

@Dr.LongMonkey

2 жыл бұрын

I always thought Disney’s Alice In Wonderland was missing something

7:16 It's amazing how the cat from the new remakes it's so inspired by the 33.

Uts sad to think that the Disney one was considered a failure. When the art work is so beautiful. The 1933 looks beautiful too, a masterpiece in his time. And we can see how heavily influenced the Disney one.

Is no one gonna talk about the flamingos!?

9:44 wait is that a real flamingo in the 1933 version????

@GottagitchaGROOOVEon

2 жыл бұрын

It was. 🦩😔

Fun Fact: there was going to be an 1939 animation of the story, but it never happened, due to possibly being too dark and gritty.

I prefer the Disney version of Alice in Wonderland (1951)

1933 I really hope those poor Flamingos were not real, because they look quite real.😢

even though nothing is exposed during the drink-me-eat-me scenes, ?how'd Disney get away with Alice in very unladylike poses (knees apart)?

The door scene was different. 33 has doors open to the right. 51, left. Didn't think it was