If Ginger went to Field of Dreams he’d have problems with the corn in the outfield & the lack of modern amenities.

@CoachJim4UM

Жыл бұрын

When he finds out there is no upper deck he’d have a heart attack

@NoName-zb1gm

Жыл бұрын

No windows!!

@MichaelCohen23

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣

@VianoMusicAcademy

Жыл бұрын

It’s missing a retractable roof

@monexpo86

Жыл бұрын

He prob never been to any of these parks in person

The stadium is basically brand new after the renovations they just finished a few years ago. There’s even a video about it on the Cubs KZread channel.

@thetrooper5065

Жыл бұрын

This dude has never heard of the 1060 Project that renovated all of Wrigley Field a few years ago

@pahwraith

Жыл бұрын

The concourse, clubhouse and bleachers are new. But main grandstand seating is exactly the same as when I was a kid 30 years ago. They rebuilt a lot but not everything and it shouldn’t be rebuilt. Its fine the way it is. If you dont like it, take the el train 30 minutes soutb and buy a sox ticket and feck off.

They already renovated Wrigley Field. They're done.

The Cubs ownership just renovated Wrigley a few years back. They made a new dugout, lifted the stadium, opened the concourses & changed the scoreboard. I don't think Wrigley needs anymore renovations. It's perfect the way it is. 😊

@popmusic244

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, the ownership worked with the neighborhood and the city to totally renovate the entire stadium. I think it was either National Geographic or NOVA did a 1 hour tv show on the renovation of Wrigley Field

@jeffkorell6576

Жыл бұрын

I think they need to go to a more cantilevered design to hold up the upper deck the way all the newer stadiums are constructed. That way, they can get rid of those poles that hold up the upper deck that block a lot of the views of game on the field.

@Maxpankewycz

Жыл бұрын

I agree with you, I was just there for a tour, its a ball park to watch a baseball game at and drink some beer. They don't need the modern amenities to get people there for people to not watch the game.

We’re lucky to have Wrigley. They had to essentially reinvent to wheel to make it structurally stable as part of the renovations. Not long ago the consensus was that it couldn’t be saved.

@ldfreitas9437

Жыл бұрын

If only Seals Stadium had the architecture to have added a second deck. Candlestick never would have been built. Maybe Bay Meadows Racetrack south of San Francisco down the Peninsula half way would have become the home of the 49ers way back in the late 60s.

I think Wrigley Field is fine the way it is now. If you "modernize" it by taking away the pillars and adding luxery boxes, 1) it'll ruin the stadium and 2) there's no room to build any of that. Compare old Comisky to new Comisky. Both have around the same compacity but the new stadium is more massive. You can't have the upper deck right on top of the lower deck without pillars. The pillars can't handle the added weight of luxury boxes and there's no room in between the decks for them. The concourses are crampt enough as it is, so taking away more space from them isn't an option either. The only way to make this stadium "modern" is to remove huge amounts of seats and have whole sections of "luxury suites" or "party decks" or what have you. It won't work.

@ldfreitas9437

Жыл бұрын

You're correct. I've pointed this out to people I've gone to Oracle Park with, as it sort of is like Wrigley. The upper decks there are set way back, barely hanging over the lower deck, not like at Wrigley where the second deck overhangs over half the lower deck.

@Maxpankewycz

Жыл бұрын

I agree with you. I was just there for a tour, I don't think anyone want to change anything and the reno they just did was to make sure its structurally sound and will last another 100 years. They have 4 club sections with bars under the stands, they did this so people would be out watching the game and have suites and patios. also the bleachers in the outfield are GA so that's a fun atmosphere

I'm very unclear as to what is being proposed here, if the seating configuration stays the same what advantage is their to changing the sectioning? Is this just an aesthetic thing, do people think smaller sections look better? And modernizing the exterior? The entire aesthetic beauty of Wrigley Field is that it has preserved the jewel box ballpark architecture of the 1910s and 1920s. This is like arguing that exterior of the Chrysler Building or St. Peter's Basilica needs to be modernized, it's baffling. Their value is in their preservation. Any renovations should be focused on the following: maintaining structural integrity, restoration of aging/weathered components, visitor comfort, amenities (food quality, bathrooms), and accessibility. The aesthetics should, as much as possible, be preserved. Same goes for Fenway and Dodger Stadium.

@Maxpankewycz

Жыл бұрын

agreed. They just did all of that in their renovations and they restored historical elements.

They redid all of Wrigley . I don’t think you understand - have you ever been there ????

You have no idea since you have never been there. the seat are perfect and the just renovated this.

They aren't going to change the upper deck without changing the entire structure that supports the upper deck itself. they spent a ton of money redoing the support beams 8 years back because they were badly rusted at the foundation.

Sometimes it seems like this guy has no idea about what’s he’s talking about especially concerning stadiums that he’s never been to. Also he’s way to obsessed with the batter’s eye.

Apparently you didn't realize that the 1060 project happened. That whole lower bowl was already rebuilt. Everything was shored up and redone. There is a video out talking about what they did. It's over an hour long, definitely worth the check out.

A dump? Wrigley Field a dump? The upper deck at Wrigley Field puts you closer to the action than many ballparks' expensive terrace seating and corporate suites. Most people go to ballparks to watch baseball, not to evaluate their architecture. Modern ballparks make the cheap seats more expensive and further away from the field. The Cubs are able to make a handsome profit while preserving a good fan experience. Don't fix what isn't broke. Thanks for the new English word "reconfigurated," though.

@jonathanphillips-yakym3646

Жыл бұрын

Exactly I started laughing my brains out when he said wrigley is a dump bc of the upper deck in his last video 😂 like damn they just got done putting in almost a billion in and around the stadium and completely rebuilt the support structure of the stadium

@jonathanphillips-yakym3646

Жыл бұрын

Maybe if he reads some comments he will actually find out what the 1060 project was all about they didn’t just redo the outfield

@mgmeo

Жыл бұрын

This fool never reads his comments, he just cranks out bullshit hoping to make $25 a video

@gabrielsandoval7331

Жыл бұрын

When you compare it with the seating of modern stadiums yes, wrigley does have a dump type feel. Let’s not get butthurt about it. He’s not saying to make any material updates to Wrigley. Just a cosmetic upgrade.

@jonathanphillips-yakym3646

Жыл бұрын

@@gabrielsandoval7331 I’m not trying to sound butthurt. Maybe it’s because I have so much information about what they did with wrigley in the last decade and a half. They did a lot more than just redo the outfield seating and add wrigleyville. Also you can’t consider redoing the upper deck a “cosmetic” change as you have to essentially rebuild the stadium to make sure it’s structurally safe for a “split upper deck” they put in a brand new foundation over the course of the 2010s to make sure it’s structurally safe now. As if anyone knew how much of an actual dump wrigley was before the ricketts purchased the team. It was in bad shape. The stadium would literally sway left to right. When they dug up foundation pieces they found out the old supports were so bad that there were almost no concrete left in the ground. They put almost a billion into the 1060 project and right now it’s probably a top 5 park for amenities and things to do. There’s a documentary on the 1060 project it’s a really cool video and a awesome learning experience into what all they did and the efforts the rickets went through to renovate wrigley vs finding a new neighborhood

I went to Wrigley for a game for the first time this week. Using the word ‘dump’ to describe it in any capacity is a war crime. I walked the whole stadium. Everything looked beautiful, clean, well-maintained. The renovations were as advertised. The seating bowl and second deck were outstanding AS IS. So the sections aren’t divided like a modern stadium? Why do they NEED to be?! These are changes no one is asking for. It’s like going back to A New Hope and having Gredo shoot first.

@TN-we3zt

Жыл бұрын

In my long response, I tried to be as polite as possible. Listening to this again and hearing his characterization of parts of it as a "dump" is an outrage. It really leads me to question why I even took so much time responding to this garbage. It's amazing how someone can spend over ten minutes repeating the same non-sensical platitudes.

You need to do your homework before spending time on video production. 1) They rebuilt clubs and redid lower areas recently. 2) they also redid upper areas and added new walkways and bathrooms etc 3) most importantly Wrigley is a historical landmark and you can’t alter it much

Some things are better left untouched

@chriskay1449

Жыл бұрын

Somethings, including Wrigley, are best blown up and started over from scratch.

@creedencebakken2686

Жыл бұрын

@@chriskay1449 L

This guy really hates upper decks

Dude can’t go one video without complaining about upper decks it’s honestly a little hilarious

@michaelreich2312

Жыл бұрын

"Just a wall of seats out there"

@michaelreich2312

Жыл бұрын

Stadiums should just remove all seating altogether and install drinking rails

@tklalmighty

Жыл бұрын

Out of spite, they should just remove the lower deck entirely and turn the upper deck into a real wall of seats going all the way back across the street.

@adanalyst6925

Жыл бұрын

@@michaelreich2312 this is making me laugh so much, my roommates are wondering what’s up

@timothynoder8889

Жыл бұрын

All he ever does is bitch about the upper decks

The design is old, but the stadium overall is pretty much new. It was rebuilt to pretty much look the same for a reason and they aren’t going to rebuild it again after only six years.

You cannot be serious in comparing the costs between refurbishing the Rogers Centre and Wrigley Field. That is not comparing apples to apples. One is a stadium built in the late 1980s and most likely follows many of the modern construction methods. The other was built in the 1910s and need much more effort to bring it up to modern standards. Refurbishing any structure old as that is always going to cost more than the modern equivalent. And given that they just spent 750 million a few years ago on the outfield improvements and other things around the ballpark, you're not going to see anything change for the forseeable future. Mr. Ricketts is pretty rich, but not stupid rich (relatively speaking). The Cubs need to see some return on that investment before spending big bucks on another.

No leave Wrigley

Well considering the cubs just put almost a billion into the stadium and around the stadium I doubt it will be in our lifetimes. If ever. But I kind of find it odd you don’t like the cubs seating but you liked commiskeys seating and they are basically the same type of upper deck stands.

Guys a joke!

The Ricketts clan just spent in excess of $350 million to renovate and restore Wrigley Field. They brought everything up to standards and added many amenities. I thought addressing the upper deck was part of "The 1060 Project."

@DaSixtyNiner

Жыл бұрын

Over eight hundred million

@RickO4404

Жыл бұрын

@@DaSixtyNiner ... It cost that much? I thought when they first proposed this, it was said to be $350 million. My goodness, they paid $895 million for the Cubs when they bought the franchise from the Tribune in 2009.

@2838Steve

Жыл бұрын

Without a cent of tax money unlike the sox😊

@RickO4404

Жыл бұрын

@Steven McKinney ... Yes. The Ricketts' paid for everything without any tax money involved.

@nochey78

Жыл бұрын

@@DaSixtyNinerit was $550 million to be exact… not a small sum..

They did renovate most of the grandstand. They kept the outer facade.

@jonathanphillips-yakym3646

Жыл бұрын

Yup. 1060 project brought new life and updated the stadium by a great margin. What’s even crazier is they did all that while still playing in a construction zone for almost a decade

@Rockett16

Жыл бұрын

I think he knows that. He just wants people to comment, and he does this in every video.

@jordanking6939

Жыл бұрын

​@@Rockett16 Wrigley field already modernize the facility. If they build a new ballpark all together, it's no longer Wrigley field.

@adanalyst6925

Жыл бұрын

@@Rockett16 dang DG is bigger brained than I thought

@TN-we3zt

Жыл бұрын

​@@jordanking6939 Exactly. He constantly talks vaguely about "modernizing" the park but if his advice is followed, the park will lose its charm.

They just rebuilt the wrigley lower bowl

Being a Tigers fan I can appreciate what you Cubs fans have in Wrigley. I still miss Tiger Stadium to this day. Comerica Park didn’t even come close to replacing it. Keep Wrigley!!!

No way Ginger!

They shouldn’t rebuild it and they just did that massive renovation! Go watch the video about it!

Don’t touch Wrigley it’s perfect

You mentioned the lower bowl needing work. They just completely gutted the lower bowl a few off-seasons ago. The concrete is new, the clubhouses are new, and the foundation of the pillars were restored. As for the upper deck? They added more restroom and concession locations for better convenience. They also had a restoration project on the press box. As with the exterior, they removed the concrete panels and chain-link fencing, and installed a wrought iron facade as its replacement along the terrace level. Also, they installed terra cotta roofing to the street-level facade. The wrought iron and terra cotta facades were put in as a nod to what the ballpark looked like in the golden age of baseball. So as far as “modernizing” the upper deck, or any other areas of the ballpark, it feels like they’ve already done most of the work. The way the upper deck is configured is perfectly fine for me and I don’t believe anything else really needs to be done. The only other thing I can think of for the upper deck is the upkeep and maintenance on the health of the concrete structure itself. But as far as any expansion, I’m not sure how that would happen. Unless they build vertically, due to the limited space they have with the ballpark’s surroundings to expand outwards, or horizontally. I mean, if you build vertically, you’d also be building horizontally as well, if you’re adding more seats and going up a slope… if that makes sense. Edit: You kept referring to “the outfield”, those seats out there are actually called “the bleachers.”

@TN-we3zt

Жыл бұрын

This video seems like a spur-of-the-moment job that was not well-thought out at all. There is nothing but a repetition of the need to "modernize" without any articulation of what that means.

Wrigley is perfect the way it is how many times do people have to say that?

Something tells me this guy hasn't been to or done significant research on almost all of the venues he talks about. A lot of his opinions on these venues come off as unpolished, somewhat lacking in both context and research. Start with Dodger Stadium. At 0:50, the idea of taking out any seats would never be a consideration for the Dodgers because of the nature in which the stadium was built. They have an agreement with the Chavez Ravine neighborhood that caps their stadium at 56k seats. To decrease the capacity would be to decrease the Dodgers' leverage with the neighborhood. To wit, every single renovation in that stadium's history has maintained that capacity. Now to Wrigley. Splitting the upper deck at Wrigley would be a significant investment. There's basically no concourse for the upper deck and that would have to be built anew; you basically go up there from the lower deck and you're already at the cross aisle. It's not even worth comparing costs between Rodgers Centre and Wrigley. The construction concerns of the two venues are obviously different. You also couldn't do much with the lower bowl, given how shallow the slope of the bowl already is and how close to the bottom of the upper deck the last row gets. I'm also pretty sure people complained about the video boards.

@donkraemer50

Жыл бұрын

I don't mind the video boards. I do wish I would have visited before they were installed though.

@tklalmighty

Жыл бұрын

@@donkraemer50 Yeah, I mean they took enough care in my opinion to make sure it wasn't too dominating in the outfield, but it's the same battle they had when they were the last team to install lights back in the 80s.

@adanalyst6925

Жыл бұрын

Dang! I always wondered what the legalistic reason Dodger stadium had to be 56,000. Now I know :)

Do your research before talking. They didn’t just renovate the outfield. They also renovated the lower bowl.

This sort of thing worked out well for Soldier Field!

Fenway still has some bad seats especially the seats at the right field pole where the seats are facing center gruel instead of home plate. Wrigley and Fenway both have poles that result in obstructed views.

Careful…Chicago is very jealous when it comes to Wrigley Field.

7:26 those seats on the foul lines were re-angled for better viewing as well.

@GT1004

Жыл бұрын

Yes other stadiums have actually copied those seats’ angles

No just leave it Alone

@eddieannis9867

Жыл бұрын

It just got redone in 2015 though now no more bashing on our wrigley Field

HELL NO!!!!!!!

Reconfigurated?

@TN-we3zt

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

What the Cubs did with Wrigley Field is beyond amazing. I grew up at Wrigley and Comiskey. Back in the days, it sucked, now it is perfect. Not outdated one bit. Putting in those scoreboards, lit off a bitch fest. The Cubs almost moved to Rosemont because of the complaints over the boards. The brick idea is a fad. Wrigley never had a brick exterior. As for the Sox, move to the burbs. Guaranteed Rate Field is a disaster.

@RickO4404

Жыл бұрын

Right. The owners of the rooftop clubs located across from the ballpark on Waveland and Sheffield Avenues were all angry about the new video boards blocking the view of the field. The matter went to court, but the Ricketts family won. They wound up buying most of those rooftop clubs; in order for the team to realize a significant portion of the revenue from those rooftop seats.

They would have to tear the entire stadium down to reconfigure the seating. The reason the previous renovation was over a billion dollars was because they pretty much rebuilt the entire superstructure of the ballpark. Plus a major renovation would probably remove the federal landmark designation.

They spent lots on the entire stadium’s structural

Ginger Wrigley field is *perfect* just like it is bro

It'd be hard to do this and improve it. Wrigley is already the gold standard for section design. Maybe bringing the upper deck closer but it's already the closest.

No leave it alone……..however if the owners chose to renovate it…….It would be double edged sword for one your replacing a part of baseball history and get backlash for it and possibly have wrigley lose its national landmark status. but on the other hand it will need to be rebuilt sooner or later as the stadium will age beyond repair if not given proper maintenence before it becomes an issue ie(ceeling falls on fans etc.) but what they should do is rebuild it in the form of a brand new upper deck but with an identical design to the original upper deck thats up to building codes and safety standards Tldr just rebuild it in an identical design

@jonathanphillips-yakym3646

Жыл бұрын

People don’t realize the cubs just got done putting almost a billion into and around the stadium basically rebuilding the supports and everything at wrigley there is a documentary about it it’s very interesting

So Dodger is 'legendary' but Angel Stadium, which is 6 years younger is...?

@thescott7539

Жыл бұрын

five years younger. Big A doesn't get the love because people forget just how old it is due to the renovations it's gone through. In other words, depending on your age, you grew up with a much different ballpark.

Wrigley is so beautiful now after the renovations, you have to go to understand

They actually did renovate the lower bowl as apart of the 1060 project.

Doubtful as that’s part of the historic charm they preserved during the renovation. Having said that I was at game 3 of the 2015 Lcs and my view from the pitcher’s mound to home plate was completely obstructed by those damn pillar’s. I doubt it’ll happen but I wouldn’t lose sleep over its removal.

While we are on the subject of Chicago, the Bears are going to be looking for a new home. Looking forward to hearing from you about that.

The Cubs just renovated Wrigley with the 1060 project look it up there's a whole documentary about it. They found rust on supports so your whole thing on a new upper deck won't happen. Wrigley is fine the way it is. Don't go and say it's a dump or try to modernize it.

Modern Looking Design.??? The old design is why tourists go there.

It's a National Historic Landmark, as is Fenway. They CAN'T make major renovations without making sure the historic stuff remains. And, the F line is the workhorse of the upper deck and got fixed in 2015, it's not going to be removed or fixed.

I don’t think it needs a thing. Wrigley is fine. I don’t think it’s getting anything either. The Rickets Family just did a 10 year long 1021 Project. I don’t see them tearing back into that thing at this point.

You've obviously never visited Wrigley or ever heard of Project 1060

Ginger discovers that landmarks are supposed to look old. That's the whole appeal of Wrigley. The fact that its a preserved relic of history frozen in time.

You have no idea what you’re saying. It just had a beautiful renovation. Lower and upper Deck renovated. Gorgeous too.

I said the same thing years ago, keep the outfield and make the rest more modern. Not that hard, wouldn't change a thing.

In 2016 the lower bowl was renovated, outfield, clubhouse, fan clubs, fan areas, etc. Wrigley is fine the way it Is. The sight lines in the lower bowl are fine. Not every stadium needs to be perfect. This guy is nuts. It's like saying fixing the seats at fenway that Don't face homplate down the line.

They are NOT putting a roof over Dodger Stadium. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Dude, Wrigley had a major renovation to the lower bowl within the last three or four years. They tore it all out and built new locker rooms, training areas, etc. underneath the seats. This channel is so pointless.

They already renovated the lower deck as part of the recent renovations. The brand new concrete is very noticeable. Also no need to mess with the upper deck. The 300 level has some of the best views in the park.

WE NEED A BAR IN THE OUTFIELD ... instead of just going to the cubby bear across the street

@MikeNapoli1989

7 ай бұрын

Same. They should remove that ugly old scoreboard in center field

@MichaelMike8988

7 ай бұрын

@@MikeNapoli1989 NO they need to remove the new TV and move it across the street the new score board also

@MikeNapoli1989

7 ай бұрын

@@MichaelMike8988 not gonna happen buddy

@MichaelMike8988

7 ай бұрын

just make it bigger and work it in with the rooftops then shut off the streets for a black party during the games . @@MikeNapoli1989

So just seeing this video for the first time...the upper and lower deck were both renovated (increased room in the concourse, added bathrooms and concessions). Is he asking to push the upper deck back or something? Only other work that's being done right now is the roof is being redone.

They already did a complete renovation of the upper and lower decks. 2015 to 2019. You complain too much. What I will agree is they should've built a new stadium in 2015 to 2019.

The Cubs did renovated lower bowl it's was done in massive renovation projects to Wrigley you clearly don't know what you are talking about here. You are also basically calling Wrigley a dump and Wrigley is no way a dump

You should make a video on baseball stadium in Puerto Rico like San Juan has Hiram bithorn alot of legend played in the ball park

Dodger stadium was built almost 50 years after wrigley.

Wrigley is perfect how it is my guy

If the Cubs were to add another deck they would probably play at Comisky Park for a year. That would be really weird but that is probably what they would do. Also, I don't see the Dodgers ever playing in a domed stadoum ever. The weather is way to nice there and never any rain outs.

They had to renovate the stadium because they had to fix the F-posts, I do agree that they to replace the roof. Having to fix the F-posts took alot of time and money. They had deal with the rooftoppers.

Thought they redid the lower bowl??

A dome in Los Angeles is never going to happen. First, like you said, Dodger stadium has another 20 years left (at least). What they’ll do next is put an overhang to provide more shade to the fans. It would be great to develop some of the land around it to small commercial such as restaurants etc. But even if they ever choose to build another stadium they are not going with a dome. The fans will quickly crucify this idea.

@tklalmighty

Жыл бұрын

Never mind that a dome is probably completely infeasible on that land with that stadium

@snoop11080

Жыл бұрын

Sofi stadium

@gabrielsandoval7331

Жыл бұрын

@@tklalmighty Well I'm talking about a new stadium. Clearly you can't add a dome or overhang over Dodger Stadium.

@tklalmighty

Жыл бұрын

@@gabrielsandoval7331 fair enough. Frankly all three of these ballparks have at least 20-30 years of play left anyway

@gabrielsandoval7331

Жыл бұрын

@@snoop11080 Apples to oranges because: 1) LA hasn't had a NFL team in decades. So it's not like they're chipping at a tradition for a storied franchise; 2) we all pretty much get that a newer stadium invites other events like the Superbowl, World Cup, Olympics etc. Again, the Dodgers have played in an open field forever and people here are big fans of warm nights at the ballpark. I don't know why anyone would consider taking that away...

I completely agree about Wrigley Field. You can't have beams obstructing views and you need club seats and luxury boxes and press areas etc. I would think something like Target Field in Minnesota or Oracle Park in San Francisco with the Wrigley touches like lights and overhang would fit, look, feel, and be more comfortable. Got to get rid of the pillars.

@wildsmiley

Жыл бұрын

Target Field and Oracle Park are 21st century ballparks. Wrigley (and Fenway) are from the early 20th century. Despite renovations, they always will be. Or always SHOULD be.

@ikehammett5160

Жыл бұрын

@@wildsmiley I don't disagree with you. Are you against them putting lights there? New video boards, changing out the seats and renovating restrooms? Old Yankee stadium recieved a huge renovation in the 1970s, you can still preserve the historic look and feel but make it a more pleasant experience. I'm certain even the fans back in the old times complained when they sat behind a beam. Just like the outfield renovation they can make it look really nice.

They don't need to change it it is fine the way it is

Dated? Well, yea it’s over 100 years old. And looks perfect all things considered.

With all due respect, can you please be a little more specific on your suggestions? What, exactly, do you mean by "more modern?" What, exactly, is dated by the seating bowl? Practically every park opened since 1992 incorporates retro features, albeit with modern facilities. What, exactly, is renovated Wrigley Field missing with respect to modern amenities that can be added without detracting from the charm of the park? (Contrary to what you assert, the charm of the park comes from more than just the outfield bleachers and the ivy on the walls.) Have you actually been to Wrigley Field? Are you familiar with the ballpark and the changes that have happened there? What, specifically, is so outdated about seating in the lower bowl? The seats were all realigned in the mid-1960s to face toward the infield. The seats--including in the upper deck--are very close to the field. The fans have a great view of the action. If you want concessions, there are plenty of those below the lower bowl and, for fans in the upper deck, there are concessions that have been added outdoors and behind the upper deck (similar to Camden Yards). You make brief mention of "splitting the upper deck" with no explanation or example for the viewer to understand what you mean. Your reference to additional luxury boxes and a renovation of the press box is similarly vague. Finally, your frequent references to the need to "modernize" the seating bowl (without describing what that means) provides no clear imperative for such a drastic renovation other than your belief that Wrigley Field looks outdated. Likewise, your comments on Dodger Stadium are similarly misguided. Why does Dodger Stadium need a retractable roof? Entire seasons are played there without rainouts. There are plenty of other ballparks with more oppressive daytime heat. Have you ever endured the humidity in Chicago or Washington, DC in the summer? I'd like to know what prompted this video. I've seen nothing to indicate anyone is thinking of the renovations you discuss. I suppose this was prompted by your own assessment of trends. In that vein, your emphasis on a "modern" look to include the latest external design features has led you astray. Contrary to your assessments, Wrigley Field has been modernized sufficiently to attract the modern fan and earn sufficient revenue without detracting from its charm. Were your proposals to be implemented, Wrigley Field would no longer be a historic landmark. It would be no different from most MLB parks of the last 30 years. It would no longer be Wrigley Field except in name only. This proposal is even more misguided than the renovation of Soldier Field. That renovation, ill-thought as it was, was the result of an untenable effort to keep the tenants playing in the same location. Wrigley Field faces no such situation it is a fully serviceable major league ballpark. Undertaking these proposed renovations will shorten the life of Wrigley Field by taking away its charm.

Tear the dump down. Move the cubs to Nashville or something.

Nah it's straight. No improvements needed for a while nor soon.

Configurated?

Guaranteed Rate Field Ging.

No. If you keep updating, at some point, you end up questioning what's left of the park that opened in 1914. Rogers Center is more dated than Wrigley, honestly. And Wrigley never had a brick exterior, so why add one? Leave the Friendly Confines alone. You want to make it less friendly.

I doubt they'll add a roof to Dodger Stadium. They have one rainout every 10 years.

@ddddirge

Жыл бұрын

Not that type of roof I think what he mean, the grandstand roof probably... 🤔🤔🤔

Not everything needs to be modernized or retrofitted. Wrigley Field is iconic. That would be like modernizing Graceland.

Why tho? I don’t understand what having a new deck would do

I swear he says he hates the split section all the time then says “split section it” 2:20 They already renovated it. Leave it alone

They don't need to change these stadiums

Sounds just like a New Yorker

Was just there on saturday and sat upper deck first base. Theres literally nothing wrong with it at all.

I’m sick of this obsession with rebuilding/remodeling stadiums. Newer does not equate to better. Quite the opposite usually.

Dude how hot do you think it gets at Dodger Stadium lol nobody out here has ever talked about adding a roof here or ever will. Its in the 90’s in the day during summer and occasionaly 100 plus during a heat wave maybe but nobody is really bothered or not up for going to a Dodger game in the day its not like its Arizona out here

I wouldn't be opposed to having the upper deck "modernized" where you can get rid of the pillars in the lower bowl and the upper deck. If they could do that and keep the same exact look that would be awesome. I'm not sure what you mean by reconfigure the lower bowl. You kept saying that but you never expanded on what needs to be done. Side note: Dodger stadium is awful. I don't know why you kept talking about it like it was fine. That POS needs to be torn down and thrown into the ocean.

@alexlackner1945

Жыл бұрын

Reconfigurating actually...

Dude You have NO IDEA what you’re talking about,, The cubs re-did the lower bowl and added 3 major clubs underneath the seats, now the upper deck is another story, but the lower bowl was given a major major overhaul about 5 years ago

2:49 Combined-ing?

If Depressed Ginger got to design his own ballpark, how long would it be before he started calling it a dump?

@wildsmiley

Жыл бұрын

10 years at most

No Wrigley doesnt have to "modernize". Can always update behind the scenes but don't make Wrigley modern

There is a reason Wrigley Field consistently ranks in the top five of all MLB Parks. Seeing a game there is an experience that only Fenway and Dodger Stadium can even come close to. Plenty of multimillion dollar “modern” stadiums that have come and gone in Wrigley’s lifetime. And plenty modern stadiums have difficulty filling seats. Wrigley Field is averaging 96% of capacity this year. Attendance was over 40,000 today. Chicago loves Wrigley Field just like it is. Your opinion is baloney. Wrigley Field is iconic. No one cares what you think. Lol

This is the most casual take I’ve ever seen. Complains that Wrigley seems dated, well no shit Sherlock it’s over 100 years old, and you’re making it seem like oh it’s fine and all I’d just completely redo and change the structure of half the stadium to make it look more like Sox park on the other side of the city from what you described. Plus the poles weren’t placed to purposely be a nuisance for fans, but is called support and removing them would require drastic changes to hold up the second deck, which I’m not a legal expert, but Wrigley is a federal landmark and can only be touched so much as well. The seating configuration is more odd, but it’s cause it’s “dated” as you most brilliantly figured out, but remember it’s not surrounded by parking lot, it’s jammed in the middle of a neighborhood they only had so much room to fit so many seats in. Another final note is dodger stadium is the 3rd oldest yes, but should not even be mentioned in terms of age with Wrigley and Fenway, two completely different ballparks in completely different eras, when Wrigley and Fenway were built the Empire State Building wasn’t built for another 15 years just about, and then compare where design was by the 60s. I suggest specializing in one or few things instead of trying to cover everything with casual light informed takes