To study Islam @ The Knowledge College go to the link below t.me/joinchat/5NFvJnCtiVplNjc0

@user-ox8zu9zr3q

2 жыл бұрын

Brother Imran you should be just and remember that you are accountable for every word you utter

@ImranKhan-iq3rk

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ox8zu9zr3q i am and if you try and defend people who are injust you remember your going to face your creator with your words, deeds and actions, I'm happy to speak against your masters

@user-ox8zu9zr3q

2 жыл бұрын

@@ImranKhan-iq3rki I praise Allah that you are .....may Allah reward you .....it was just a reminder from me to you .....most of the major scholars that i sit with the like of sheik Salih Alusaymee Asheik Muhammad Ali Aaadam Asheik Abdul Kareem Alkhudeir all of them i never heard them talking the way you talk about the ottoman empire and i sat with or listen to hundreds of hours of these scholars

@phenomcollege4188

2 жыл бұрын

You said "how could the prophet praise kuffaar"? If I quoted you right, do you have any evidence that Muhammad Faati had the belief that Allah was in the creation? This wrong aqeeda you accuse them of, was it all of them that had it? Be fair and factual for God's sake!!

@phenomcollege4188

2 жыл бұрын

I would advise those taking knowledge from you to be very open-minded

Imran it wasn’t Pakistan nor Arabia that brought Islam to my country or Bosnia but it was the Turks elhamdulilah. They may have had their faults but that doesn’t overwrite their spread of Islam in Europe

@mahirarubaiya3052

Жыл бұрын

and do not forget they are almost the only one who stand up in europe

@user-ue4fh5mv9s

11 ай бұрын

"spread of islam in europe" are you joking ?! hardly anybody in the balkans practise islam and they will when they can take break from drinking

@Fekir.61

10 ай бұрын

This is the way we speak of our muslim brothers right, I have many bosnian friends that are great muslims arent there established mesjids there aswell, watch your mouth @@user-ue4fh5mv9s

@shabazali1356

10 ай бұрын

wrong answer muhammed al qasim bought islam to subcontinent im sindh it spread plz learn knowledge and not from ertrugul real knowledge

@TheMonotheist1744

10 ай бұрын

Spread of shirk and bidah more like

In 1917/1918 we lost Palestine because of this mindset. People thought it was better without the Ottomans(Turks) and side with the brits for independence. The rest is history

@PokemonDude880

2 жыл бұрын

Well that’s one example. But then you could look at Mecca, and how it’s much better off without the ottoman influence

@user-gx1oz9sm6l

2 жыл бұрын

@@PokemonDude880 Really? Saudi government is letting singing, dancing, alcohol seep into the Haramayn and soon they will place all these things near The holy kaabah...

@PokemonDude880

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-gx1oz9sm6l they haven’t touched Mecca or medinah though. And all they did to those 2 places were destroy the tombs and shrines that the ottomans put in place, therefore they literally made it better than when the ottomans were there.

@suluklu

2 жыл бұрын

@@PokemonDude880 brother what are you on about . They had Halloween parties in mecca hotels . Did you know ottomans started building hajj railways which was meant to be from istanbul to mecca and expenses were covered for old and poor people to travel?? But it was sabotaged by some arab tribes under the command of lawrence and later handed to british which they used it to bring down the ottomans by transporting troops and ammunition .. in 2018 haifa to riyadh section is sold to israil by saud family to be revived and still 16 ottoman steam trains are in use from syria to jordan .. saying mecca is more glorious and a very profitable business project under sauds is true but saying its better and easier for the whole ummah would mean you are clueless brother .. in ottomans time Hajj became a hub where pan-Islamic and anti-colonial ideas could be exchanged across the Muslim world.. under ottomans it was a totally different place .. it even had an indian Sharif and a Malaysian imam now its too much politics and business ..il advise this book for you Imperial mecca (micheal christopher low)

@PokemonDude880

2 жыл бұрын

@@suluklu who told you they had Halloween parties? Turks?😂😂. Trust me the destruction of shirk is more important then not having a railway. Do you know umrah and hajj is free? The only cost is the private companies that fly people or the companies that own hotels, none of that money even goes to the Saudi Arabian family

I am very sad to see this kind of preachers talk and misguide people, it breaks my heart.

@Kratos-iq4zb

2 ай бұрын

Yes very sad and very misguiding. He should stick to talking about Deen. He has no knowledge about history therefore should shut his mouth.

@stamanakert06

2 ай бұрын

so can you tell me, is grave worshiping permisible in islam?

@habuub.hamza8400

Ай бұрын

this guy is not a trustable scholar and those like him are after fitnah may Allah protect the muslimeen from their fitnah ameen!

@habuub.hamza8400

Ай бұрын

no muslim worships a grave ya jahil, open ur eyes get out of ur wahhabi environment and read history and islam, our Prophet saw even said visit my grave after my passing. And praying FOR them and reading quran etc and sending the blessings to them aint worshiping them men. Wth is wrong with u wahhabis

The Ottomans killed their brothers but the Saudi "Rulers of Tawheed" didnt? If i recall one of the Saudi kings was shot by his nephew/Uncle (forgot which)

@fahadb8611

2 жыл бұрын

King faisal (r.a) was killed by his nephew

@Yusuf.Ilyas.17

2 жыл бұрын

That's case is totally different - because it wasn't a legal ruling to do so, but a paid Killer. But in Ottoman Empire it was legislated by Muhammed Fatih to kill brothers, even Babies to save the Rulership

@unloved1827

2 жыл бұрын

It was one occasion, plus the one who killed the king was influenced by the west Nothing comes close to this atrocious ottaman empire; imagine ordering your children to kill each other 😭😭😭

@ovvsterancebaileysr3221

2 жыл бұрын

He was killed by his nephew because the faisal sentenced his nephews brother to death and his nephew got "revenge" on him

@yasseraltamimi6171

2 жыл бұрын

@@ovvsterancebaileysr3221 where did you get that from? he was outside the country for a very long time, and this happened after King Fisal cut off the gas from the west in 1973 in a protest on them supporting Israel and he said the famous say ""You are the ones who cant live without oil. Our ancestors lived on dates, we can easily go back and live like that again.""

The most important thing that Ottoman Empire did was to stop possible christian crusader attacks for over 623 Years and defended the Islam till 20th century. Without Ottoman Empire, maybe Arabs would be Christians or under controll of European countries now. Thats the most important contribute they did for Islam. Sad that he died in young years, I am sure Rom was not a Dream and possible with this great Leader.

@murthe-wise535

Жыл бұрын

These bastard arab madkhalis and neo salafi arab nationalists are evil they don't know what they did. I'm now an anti madkhali and neo salafi. This sect is made by arab rulers to protect their kingdom

@shuiwahlee5836

7 ай бұрын

Would be better if they were Christians

@arag-cusub

4 ай бұрын

How could u said that

@sedat7155

2 ай бұрын

Seljuk Turk helped Abbasid khalipha against Fatimid dynasty

I don’t know who this preacher is, I never listened to the “naseeha” he’s been giving because this ain’t no naseeha. He definitely doesn’t know much about the Ottoman Empire and all he does is preaching hate. The Ottoman Empire and Dynasty ruled over 700 years which is a significant periode of time and within this timespan of 700 years they’ve ruled over Eastern-Europe, Constantinople, Anatolia, Caucasus, Syria, Hejaz, Quds, Egypt, etc. They were also the rulers of the Mediterranean and the Black sea by the help of the famous Admiral of the Ottoman Navy, Khair-ad Din Barbarossa (Rahimahu Allah). The Ottoman Empire has done a great job and many beneficial achievements for the Muslim Ummah. They’ve brought Islam to Europe. You can compare the golden era of the Ottoman Empire with America today, every vassal state of the Kafir was paying annual taxes to the Ottomans because the western world and their leaders were terrified of them and didn’t want any trouble. Muhammad (Mehmet) Al-Fatih which conquered Constantinople, Selim I which saved Ahli Sunnah from the Shia’s by conquering the Holy lands, Suleiman the Magnificent which conquered many European lands and many more (may Allah have mercy upon them). Back then we had real men which fought in the name of Allah and kept the Ummah safe, now we have men like this preacher which does nothing but preach hate towards a mighty and well organized Muslim Empire.

@blackflag6976

2 жыл бұрын

There are good things and bad things about the ottomans. We should accept the faults humbly and not blindly follow and support it.

@AzimZicar

2 жыл бұрын

@@blackflag6976 exactly, this is the issue with a lot of salafi brothers nowadays

@LB-eh7sr

Жыл бұрын

you’re over glorifying the ottomans . Yes they were great at their peak but that doesn’t mean they didn’t have faults. What brother Imran said was also true he’s not making stuff up. We’re unbiased and accept the bad and the good.

@suluklu

Жыл бұрын

@@harithdanial141 true none of the Islamic empires were perfect . But this video is pretty politic rather than historic

The more this guy speaks (No ustadh or sheikh), the more I realise how little he knows. He is so misinformed and paints a whole group with the same brush. Yes no one is perfect and people make mistakes but doesn't mean they are all wrong. Plus inside the ottoman caliphate rule, there were people who were making them look bad to tarnish their name. But this guy is a curse affecting the youth and brainwashing them with falsehood. But the truth will always prevail under these lies.

@706taohid8

2 жыл бұрын

Don’t curse It can come back to you if he is not deserving of It

@MuhammedDenix

2 жыл бұрын

Yes maybe we shouldn't curse, but most of what Sherif said is pretty much valid. It's precisely because of these types of people that we have problems like Isis to deal with. Innocent young Brothers and Sisters think these kinds of people know a lot but in actual fact they know absolutely nothing. They feel as though their life before that point was without purpose and look in the wrong places. The rest is pretty much self explanatory. No doubt the Ottoman empire did have its errors but who doesn't? Even Rasullullah sallallahu allay he wa sallam was admonished in the Qur'an see surah Abasa as an example so what's he gaining by doing this video? It's worth it to refute some of the things he said. 1. The sunnah of the Ottomans was to kill their Brothers when the Sultan came to power. Yes it did happen, but the reason for this was to prevent people from fighting each other and to prevent Sultans from coming to power who could otherwise really do some serious damage. We're not talking about the President of a country or a family man looking after his family. We're talking about one huge geopolitical entity that covered huge sections of the earth. Governance is not a fruitcake, you know: especially not in a huge empire. You have to make tough decisions whether you like it or not. 2. Lands like Syria, Palestine etc were safe because of the Ottomans. Perhaps had they not taken those regions they could have even been Christian to a great extent Allah forbid! You know, it's said that when the English wanted to make kids behave in school, they would say "the turks are coming!" which just shows you how dedicated you have to be when governing your empire for you to have that kind of reputation. 3. The ikhwan al-muslimeen causing problems? The Brother doing this video seriously has to have a good understanding of how politics and military affairs work. Yes the Ikhwan do have there problems, but if it wasn't for them the Syrians wouldn't have had the capability to fight Bashar Al-Assad may Allah destroy him completely in this world and in the akhirah. While there are plenty of problems in opposition territories it's still better than Assad's security forces, who routinely rape and torture there prisoners. You know, I read an article once that said Hafiz, the father of Bashar, would make female recruits of his army stab puppies in order to show their loyalty to him. What did the other Arab countries do? Absolutely nothing! Saudi, Ejept, Jordan etc have the ability to put boots on the ground and fight Assad's forces plus the Shi'a rafidda. Instead, the Saudis say to Bashar that if he doesn't get support from Iran then they can quieten things down for him. Finally people should not rely on the internet for knowledge. Instead, read trustworthy books by people who are known to be trustworthy.

@786x29

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly I'm not the only 1 that thinks this, His Dawah Actually His voice, expressions and more so his bullshit really annoys and angers me!

@al-quran8349

2 жыл бұрын

Brother, the same scholars who you look up to most likely say the same thing as brother imran did here, yes no one's perfect but who misguided does one have to be to not only innovate but also introduce new laws and say its the law of Allah, that's lying about Allah and the quran etc. And the ottoman empire wasn't a caliphate, they gave rulership to their sons when a caliphate doesn't do such thing only if the son is most capable of the position. Plus they called themselves sultans, they wasn't known as Khalifa's.

@doctorsnuggles3299

2 жыл бұрын

You know what's the worst, this guy is part of an -islamic- college and they even get pay for their misinformation. He is just repeating, like a parrot, the saudi agenda which is to slander the ottoman empire as much it possible

The Prophet صلي الله عليهِ و سلم praised the one who would open Constantinople for the Muslims, and that was the ottoman general Muhammed al Faatih, may Allah bless him, forgive him and accept his good deeds ameen. So they have a great history and no cheap fake scholar's view can surpass the commendation of our beloved Prophet صلي الله عليهِ و سلم

@youtubeaccount9289

2 жыл бұрын

He clearly said this is for the end of times

@fatesgamers6586

2 жыл бұрын

Brother just a little mistake, I think you missed that, Sultan Mehmet Al Fatih is not Caliph. At that time mamluk Caliph is present.

@sacredinclinations

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks

@ae3172

2 жыл бұрын

@Fawaz Shaikh You're just wrong bro top to finish. 😂😂😂

@osman7240

2 жыл бұрын

The conquest of constantinople will take place in the ahkir uz zaman. In the end times.

Assalamu Alaykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, I'm not one to usually comment on KZread videos, but felt I had to on this one. Firstly, to our Brother Imran, I want to let you know that I love you for the sake of Allah my brother. I've personally benefited through watching your videos, may Allah give you and your team the best of both worlds, Ameen. Secondly, I'd like to address some of the points our brother Imran made in this video, particularly those which I feel require further elaboration and detail. InshaAllah, I will do my best to reference everything I say to Sunni Salafi sources, and I seek refuge in Allah from speaking based on my own whims and desires. بسم الله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله There is no doubt that the Ottoman Empire had mistakes, and those mistakes are not something we should sweep under the rug. Brother Imran, if you make a video highlighting all these major faults - such as unpraiseworthy Sufism and royal fratricide - wouldn't it be fair to mention the khair which Allah gave the Ottomans the Tawfeeq of achieving? To put it in context, would it not upset you if someone in the Dawah scene whom you look up to made a video highlighting all the faults of (insert any modern Muslim country you love) without giving them their fair share of deserved praise? You spoke of the Sufism and Shirk that existed in their societies, why not mention the efforts made by some Ottoman RULERS to combat Shirk? Let's speak of a movement after Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah which: - Opposed the practice of seeking the intercession of the dead at grave sites, which they labeled as KUFR - Opposed Ilmul Kalam - Opposed what they saw to be kufr in their society - including vows/sacrifices to stones, trees and tombs - Opposed what they saw to be Bid'ah in their society - including group Dhikr and dancing and innovated grave visits - Put emphasis on enjoining good and forbidding evil - Emphasized the importance of following the Qur'an and Sunnah - Gave importance to the books of Shaykhul Islam and Ibnul Qayyim I must be talking about the movement of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab right? Wrong. The movement I am referring to is none other than that of Imam Kadizade Mehmet, May Allah shower him with mercy. They were very influential throughout the 1600s. By Allah's permission, Imam Mehmet held posts at both the Suleymaniye and Ayasofya Masajid, whilst Imam Al-Ustuwani (another significant personality of this movement) took positions at the Ayasofya, Blue Masjid and the Fatih Masjid! Those who know Turkey and it's history will be able to appreciate how significant an achievement this is. On top of that, the Sultans of the time (May Allah have mercy on them) were receptive to this blessed Dawah. Imam Mehmed Vani was appointed as teacher to Sultan Mehmed IV and his son. Vani managed to persuade the Sultan to forbid Sufi dancing rituals and innovated grave visits, and even demolish a Bektashi Shrine! This is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to efforts within the Ottoman Empire to combat innovation, I will stop here as I don't want to overburden the readers. To read more about this movement and it's link to the blessed da'wah which emerged from Najd - academic.oup.com/jis/article/26/3/265/709610 (Shaykhs Abd al-Haqq Turkmani and Jalal Abualrub were involved with the creation of this essay) To read more about general efforts within the empire to establish tawheed - Page 42 in this PDF download.salafimanhaj.com/pdf/SalafiManhaj_HajjiHussain.pdf My brother Imran, You spoke about the Ottomans as being invaders and killers of their own brethren (in blood and religion), Isn't it fair to speak about the glory Allah granted to to this Ummah at the hands of this very same empire? Who destroyed the Crusaders at Mohács? Who brought the banner of Islam to the gates of Vienna? Who fought the Rafidah to the east of their border? It was the Ottomans! You have your opinion that they were not a legitimate Caliphate, and that they did not claim to be one till the proclamation of a French historian. In accordance with my desire to stick to Sunni Salafi sources, I will suffice myself with a clear proclamation made by Shaykh Uthman Al-Khamees who holds a different view kzread.info/dash/bejne/gYZ6qLptg8jLZrw.html. You are entitled to your view of course, but in matters such as this would it not be befitting of someone of your stature to demonstrate that it's not the only view within the scope of Salafi Scholarship? There is so much more that could be said, but I will end with this: My dear brother Imran, you are our Salafi brother whom we love for the sake of Allah. Please be careful about overgeneralising when speaking about such a large group of Muslims - the Ottomans lasted for over 600 years! If someone were to hear about the Ottoman empire for the first time through this video of yours, Billah A'layk would you be satisfied with the impression and information you have given them? I actually believe that there is a need to speak about some of the issues you highlighted in your video. To give an example of my reasons for feeling this way, the rise of Turkish Drama Series have made so many Muslims who don't know better revere the likes of Ibn 'Arabi (والعياذ بالله). However, please remember that as Salafis, we have to strive to be balanced in everything we do. Allah will hold us accountable for what we speak. As someone whom Allah has blessed with a large following - especially from the youth - you need to have precision and fairness in your speech at all times. I will stop here, this is nothing but an advice from the heart to a dear brother. You don't know the effect your videos have had on myself (by the permission of Allah). May Allah bless and honour you always Habibi. May Allah unite us all upon Tawheed, and allow us to witness another Islamic Golden Age. Any good I have said is from Allah, and any evil is from myself and Shaytan. وصلى الله على نبينا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه وسلم EDIT: Reposted because my comment keeps getting deleted!

@zemphz

2 жыл бұрын

bara'allahu feekum for this balanced take

@yasingorgulu7635

2 жыл бұрын

Mashallah

@tamjidulathar4097

2 жыл бұрын

Wa 'alaykum assalaam wa rahmatullahi wa barakaatuhi

@LB-eh7sr

Жыл бұрын

Very well constructed comment. May Allah bless you

@omarhassam7574

Жыл бұрын

Jazakallah for being truthful

The problem is that Muslims of today are so easy to brain wash with these series.

May Allah keep turks always within the fold of islam.

Its quite obvious that a digressed wahabi cannot praise sunni Ottomans. These are blind followers of ibn Abdul Wahhāb who in his sectarian heat also blamed Syyeduna Adam of comitting shirk in his book Attauheed !!!

@user-dz2vn8yv1b

2 жыл бұрын

Prophey Adam committing shirk? You whaat?

@tawhidmedia2895

2 жыл бұрын

By Abu Shaja'ah. MiAW CLAIMED PROPHET ADAM (AS) FOR SHIRK: REFUTATION: The Shaykh believed that Adem ('Alayhi Salatu wa Salam) committed minor Shirk, not Shirk al-Akbar. That's why the chapter where this Hadith is present is named: "Every name which leads to the service of other than Allah is prohibited." Nor did he make Takfir of Adem ('Alayhi Salatu wa Salam) therein, rather places words of praise after his name. As for the authenticity of the Hadith, the correct view is that it's weak. Ash-Shaykh al-Mujaddid had a mistaken Ijtihad for which he will be rewarded In Sha' Allah. Imam at-Tabari and a few other 'Ulama mentioned it as well, are the opponents of the Shaykh going to attack them too? Wallahul-Musta'an! And Shaykh wasn't the only one who accepted this view, others like Ibn Abi Hatim did

@rightbeliefs-747

2 жыл бұрын

@@tawhidmedia2895 you started out with wrong argument.... Ibn Abdul Wahhāb didnt mention anywhere that Seyyiduna Adam committed MINOR shirk. He simply shamefully mentioned that he committed shirk FIL ITA'AT. You again did a jurisprudence blunder by saying that giving wrong verdict (fatwa) of Shirk as ijtihad will give him reward!! Educate yourself on Ifta principles... Instead of blindly following/defending such sects, you should accept right beliefs and develop a habit of calling a spade, a spade.

This man needs to learn how to study history before opening his mouth. There's a comment below @musa which is very civil and points out the discrepancies politely, but the way this man disrespects and slanders my ancestors prompts me to deconstruct this talk. Notice how people who know even the basics of academia cite their sources and accept opposing opinions do exist. The excellence of the Islamic Scholarly tradition is made a mockery of by this guy. The reason for fratricide at the level of the Sultan's family was to prevent civil war and internal strife. Such action thus saved the empire from collapse many times and thousands of lives that would have been needlessly lost. The majority of the scholars at the time agreed with this premise, and in fact the practice of fratricide itself was outlawed by Sultan Ahmet I (1590-1617) and replaced with imprisonment of the younger princes who posed a rival threat. Importantly, this practise occurred throughout the Golden Age of Islam, and across the Western world for the very same reason. Since the Wahabbi movement has never led a functioning empire that hasn't been under the protection and control of the British Crown, they wouldn't be able to understand the wisdom needed to run a powerful Islamic Empire. Then comes the 'ground breaking discovery' that this donny has found. Even if the Hadith is referring to a future conquest, that does not negate the legitimacy of the Ottoman Khilafa. When the Ottomans conquered the Mameluk Empire in 1517 under Sultan Selim I, they claimed caliphal authority, and if anyone has read the history of WW1 in the Arabian peninsula, then they should know about Fahreddin Pasa, general of the forces stationed in Medina. When the Wahhabi movement decided to jump into bed with Lawrence of Arabia and destabilise the Muslim world, they tried time and time again to break down the Ottoman defences in Medina. Fahreddin foiled their attempts for years, and would see the Prophet (PBUH) in dreams whilst he would busily be planning the defence of the city. When he eventually surrendered due to lack of food and other resources, he and his soldiers returned home to be hailed as heroes. Muslim Empires fought amongst themselves all the time, you would have to be naive or totally ignorant to think otherwise. But a Muslim group colluding with Kafir to destroy the incumbent Khilafa for their own political and economic gain? The honour of that participation in history lies solely with the aforementioned sect and their sick ideology. Ibn Wahhab did takfir on the Ottomans to further consolidate the lie that the Saudi's should be the rightful protectors of the Holy cities. He had to justify killing Muslim's to grab power, and so the only option was to make them all non-Muslims. It really is that simple, and the British Elite supported and oversaw the entire process, laughing themselves silly over a nice Sunday Roast. And then this imbecile goes on to ask a question which I hope after some reading he will retract.. 'How can the Prophet (pbuh) praise Kuffar'. He slanderously calls us a people who used to worship graves, and I say us as a Grandson of the Ottomans. He then contradicts himself later and says Ibn Wahhab didn't do takfir on all of 'them' - who is this 'them'? The Ottoman rulers? The Scholars? The 100s of ethnicities that lived in the Ottoman lands? According to his embarrassing argument, the entire Ottoman Empire and all it's Muslim subjects across 600 years were Kuffar because 2 scholars out of many hundreds of major Scholars that operated throughout this period of time made very questionable claims - oh and everyone worshipped graves but only Dawahman knows this through his secret sources. People Like Sultan Abdulhamit I, the man who constructed the Hijaz Railway that connected Cities across Anatolia to the Hijaz; the lion who refused the advances of the Zionists when they attempted to purchase the land of Zion. This is just one example of the many Heroes of the Ottoman Era who defended Islam and the Muslim people that this ignorant buffoon has decided to deem a 'non-believer' because a couple guys he doesn't even properly understand said something that could be tantamount to Kufr. Then there's a wild story about how the Ottomans - again he fails to say who and under who's command - killed Ibn Wahhab's grandson? No evidence, and actually exposes the entire point of this talk. It's to protect Wahhabism from it's own dirty history by conjuring up a grossly distorted and false imagination of the Ottoman Empire. He didn't address the criticisms of the Wahhabi movement, he simply said 'what about them'!!? Those are some playground tactics, avoiding answering by accusing the other party. To say the circumstances in Syria and Yemen are the Ottoman's fault is actually banter. No my friend. Syria and Yemen were created by the British and French colonisers after Wahab and his traitor friends decided to work with them to make some money and gain some power. The dictators that followed were all propped up by the west to maintain control in the region. And Then we have the Saudis bombing the life out of Yemen and refusing to help a single Syrian Refugee, despite them being neighbours. So the situation we see is in actual fact largely the fault of Ibn Wahhab and his traitorous movement. Period. The man from the Najd has brought a legacy of corruption, humiliation, Western subservience and ignorance to the region. This plastic scholar is totally Bereft of Knowledge and self-contradictory. How anyone can learn from people like this makes me seriously concerned for the future of our Ummah. We need to be reading primary historical texts and thinking critically when trying to understand why the Islamic world is in the state it is today, and thus how we can begin to remedy the issues we face. Not pinning it on the Ottoman Turks and praising the most ridiculous, scandalous excuse of a nation to be the 'guiding light', when we know full well what the evil political and military reality that underpins Saudi ideology looks like. For further reading: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fratricide#Ottoman_Empire en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Caliphate

@tee7697

2 жыл бұрын

Well said

@tariqaslam1853

2 жыл бұрын

Salaam bro, this guy is way off. Wahabbi najdi slayer has a vid about him.

@laith09

10 ай бұрын

May God protect us dear brother in Islam. Just the other day, I heard of two university friends in Canada saying that we are shirk for kissing the black stone. If they studied the religion, they would find evidence that the companions did kiss the black stone because they saw the prophet do it. Such extremist views to make our blood and money halal spawned the so-called false ISIS. I am an Arab from the Levant with family in Turkey. I cannot just write off 500 years of peace and tranquillity in our lands. If you note history carefully brother, Sultan Mahmoud II sent Ali Pasha to defeat the Wahhabis because of the slaughter and killings of Muslims horror stories that reached the Sultan and their false, deceitful, infidel creed spread by the sword (even resembling what ISIS did to Syrians - my Syrian mother’s family are a testament to that). Abdullah bin Saud was beheaded in 1819 and his head was hung on a spike for 14 days in front of the Ottoman palace as a revenge of the horrific Muslim blood spilled. It cannot be emphasized enough that the Ottomans protected our religion from within in a controlled manner preventing fitna while being at threat from Napoleon, Europe, Russia, and others. And then someone as slanderous as this in the video dares to takfir the Ottoman Empire along with all its precursor empires (including Mamluks and Saljuks) and its people both then and their descendants (us). I can go on and on, but know this, the creator of this whole universe is not a creature, i.e. the creator does not resemble any of the creations in any shape or form. God does not exist up or have a physical hand (as claimed by a Wahhabi I met). God does not exist in a place nor does time pass on him. This was the creed of our Ottoman Sultans and the good empires before them.

@taimurahmad

8 ай бұрын

Watch knowledge north on ottomon

Salam ma laykum may allah bless and ease the sufferings of the ummah and may allah protect the people of palestine and Afghanistan and Lebanon and may allah protect the masjid al aqsa from the oppressors and may allah unite the ummah upon the quran and sunnah and may allah have mercy on all those that have passed away before us and may Allah have mercy on us when we pass away and may allah cure all those that have a sickness and a disability and that have corona and may allah grant them a cure that leaves no aliment and may allah protect the muslims from hellfire and may allah answer all our prayers and duas ameen

@mehmetemintatl1678

2 жыл бұрын

Aha you Arabs are like that 😜😜😜 Did you say a word about East Turkestan? Do you know what's going on in East Turkestan? Uyghur Turks, who were 65 million, are now 35 million The Chinese state is committing a major genocide But for you only Arabs are important to us, from now on there will be Turks. Handle Palestine yourself 😜😜😜 Of course, if you can, you couldn't beat 6 states. 😂😂😂😂

@hasan623

2 жыл бұрын

@@mehmetemintatl1678 May Allah punish Ataturk

@snpddl8540

2 жыл бұрын

@@mehmetemintatl1678 Are you addressing the original commenter ?

May Allah bless the ottomons and grant them janah.

Let's compare ottomans who ruled for 623 year's and ale saud who have been ruling for for 90+ year's let's do comparison and see if this man still runs his mouth he thinks Sufies are behaving according to what he thinks is wrong books can easily be fabricated to make some one look evil by the way I'm Sufi we don't worship grave's we worship ALLAH and ALLAH alone the follower's of Ale saud who themselves we're trader's who worked with the British empire to over throw ottoman empire these guy is trying to make them look like saint's same old tactics to divert attention

@aaliyah3037

2 жыл бұрын

Okay so why aren't you sufis zealous about following the Caliphate Rashidun but get emotional when someone says anything about the ottoman empire? It has been narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: The Caliphate will remain among the Quraish even if only two persons are left (on the earth)

@fahadb8611

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaliyah3037 but today saudi give bayah to america and uk

@johnanderson4710

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaliyah3037 no Quraysh can be the caliphate and the ottomans were a caliphate

@aaliyah3037

2 жыл бұрын

@FAHAD b Peace treaties exist in Islam. Go study the life of the prophet upon whom be peace.

@johnanderson4710

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaliyah3037 peace treaties with people who kill and bomb Muslims along with exploiting them? Show me where it is allowed

This roadman doesn't know history lmao

@wolfteam5219

Жыл бұрын

This road man knows his not making any sense that’s why he keeps ending his gibrish with does that make sense does that make sense. Complete t..t

The amount of emotional comments is crazy, may Allah guide this ummah

@bbqquid3152

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂 its funny it’s sad though

@quandaliousdingle-r3b

2 күн бұрын

This video was made based completely on emotions ngl

Check the history of Saudi Arabia.

@user-dz2vn8yv1b

2 жыл бұрын

90 years of haqq in the making 😂

@ovvsterancebaileysr3221

2 жыл бұрын

They have great history alhamdullilah for the house of saud

@Ryan-lf6ds

5 ай бұрын

​@@ovvsterancebaileysr3221from a$$ rimmin to c*cksuckin, great history for bedouins. 🤣

Knowledge North channel has really good series on the “reality” of Ottomans

Do you have any idea what ummayads would do? How thry stopped non Arabs from converting to Islam

Yet allah chose to glorify them while leaving certain others feeling salty about it

i dont get it, we are in the end of time though? it defo was him mentioned in Hadith

يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓا۟ إِن جَآءَكُمْ فَاسِقٌۢ بِنَبَإٍ فَتَبَيَّنُوٓا۟ أَن تُصِيبُوا۟ قَوْمًۢا بِجَهَـٰلَةٍ فَتُصْبِحُوا۟ عَلَىٰ مَا فَعَلْتُمْ نَـٰدِمِينَ O believers, if an evildoer brings you any news, verify ˹it˺ so you do not harm people unknowingly, becoming regretful for what you have done. So many lies in this video that people should be reminded of this ayah in Surah hujarat.

When are you going to tell about Lawrence of arab?

Quick questions if you know the answers....What did Prophet (PBUH) tell about Najdis ? What is happening in Saudi today is permissible in Islam (Movie theaters, concerts and guessing pretty soon Salman will open pubs too) ?

@tariqaslam1853

2 жыл бұрын

Bro they got halal alcohol, check wahabbi najdi slayer.

@tataoma9976

2 жыл бұрын

No one says it’s halal

@tariqaslam1853

2 жыл бұрын

@@tataoma9976 Tell Mufti Assim Al Hakim. He said he is proud to drink it too. Saudi Najdi jokers.

@verilyze

2 ай бұрын

Man our whole ummah is filled with jokers before kaafir we need to contain these munafiqs

3:15 I didnt know there was an "ottoman race" hahah

So what's the video '91 years since the destruction of the ottoman empire' about then? Its on your channel and you class it as the last legitimate khilafah. Care to explain please bro?

Nowadays nothing is surprising anymore from scholars avoiding talking about real matters in order to save their wealth to an average person trying to forget their own brothers and sisters suffering abroad. There is literally no one who should be praised except Allah and the messengers

@mikailshakes4514

2 жыл бұрын

That's why we don't take knowledge from most Saudi scholars

@aviadeloi498

Жыл бұрын

Well said

Saudi Arabia is opening tourism for non muslim. Free music and disco, Halloween and beaches and you are criticing The othman. You will never dare criticise the Saudis because it where yoy get your funds from Bin Salman Stop double standard

@user-dz2vn8yv1b

2 жыл бұрын

You can't say one word against MBS for bringing in belly dancers but you can criticise an entire empire who doesn't agree with your aqeedah. 😂😂😂

Waaleikum salaam warahmatullahy wabarakatuh

Literally just 1 of the Ottoman Sultan killed his brother. And that was also just for the sultanate because it could've gone into the wrong hands it is a wrong thing but you cannot blame the whole sultanate for it. And Muhammad Fateh never passed any rule like this, it is clear in the history. First of all, Ibn-Ul-Arabi didn't say ANYTHING that this guy is talking about, second if he even did he never meant it that way. People use other's word and describe it in their own way to make it feel like that the one who said it is WRONG. Like stop provoking. And about the hadeeth of Prophet about the conqueror of Constantinople, you literally said it your self that it could be ANYONE of the conquerors so this doesn't mean the hadeeth is about the conqueror of the person who did it before sultan Fateh or after him. It could be anyone who conquered it. They never invaded Muslim lands, they wanted the control on it so that they can have an Islamic rule on the lands because even at that time people couldn't stick to the rules of Allah (S.B.W). They extended the Empire not to invade and destroy the Muslims. And yes they were the Khalifa of Islam because the whole Muslim world would look up to the Sultans of the Ottoman Empire whenever there is harsh time on the Muslims. You did mention when they did something wrong, but you never mentioned how many times they helped Muslims of India, and Arab and a lot more. There wasn't a single Islamic country or empire in power at that time so they wanted to have more power to bring Islam into the recognition of being powered so that people don't deal any damage to Islam. You don't explain things the right way you just tell them. And yes it was a Caliphate. Because the every rule was according to the rules of Islam. And talking about people worshiping the graves, that wasn't the Sultans themselves. Those were the people who didn't have their thoughts cleared about Islam, and that's not the mistake of the Sultans. They always fixed the problems and did what they thought was right (and it was actually right) they did everything for Islam. You are the onw creating problems inside the head of people's mind by manipulating your fake thoughts in people and conveying the message that the Ottomans were wrong and describing their actions in a wrong way you are creating problems.

And how does this talk benefit ummah?

you said the ottomans killed their brothers which is true but it wasn't because they were scared that the will take over them but it was to prevent throne fights after their death btw it stopped in the 17 century

Ok, so what happened to the Caliphate after 1258? Did it stop to exist?

So according to this guy, the scholars, the ulema, the saints, that lived during the 600 years of ottoman rule were all wrong. So he knows better? WHAT A JOKE!

These are forged lies Dawah man!

@Brwa2005

2 жыл бұрын

oh,why are calling him liar? the answer is you turkish people if someone saying the truth about turkish history you guys are calling him liar you guys are listening to lying not the truth

@Ondoo3332

Ай бұрын

​@@Brwa2005i'm kurd but this guy is a liar.

Salaam, citations would be much appreciated here. Looking forward to the detailed lecture(s).

@RighteousnRich

2 жыл бұрын

Coming very soon Inshaa’Allah

@webots125

2 жыл бұрын

وعليكم السلام

@stoic.ascent

2 жыл бұрын

Also a Haloween lecture as saudis are wearing Dracula masks and carrying Pumkins

@doctorsnuggles3299

2 жыл бұрын

@@stoic.ascent In the case of saudi it's not allowed to speak about the rulers 😉

@user-dz2vn8yv1b

2 жыл бұрын

@@doctorsnuggles3299 these madkhali buffoons seriously want people to believe the salaf never spoke out or rebelled against the leaders. What kind of salafi washing of history is that? 😂😂😂

I’ll give you more hadith Tell me where are you from .I’ll tell your country history . Let talk about your country on ottoman time

I got you brah . I always asks people about it.

The intro is too long akhi

May allah forgive you brother i disappointed

You guys teach fusha arabic ?

@omarchikh6635

2 жыл бұрын

He should learn it first to be able to teach

@doctorsnuggles3299

2 жыл бұрын

@@omarchikh6635 This guy has no qualifications to teach the people. U know what's the worst, he is part of a "islamic" college.

@omarchikh6635

2 жыл бұрын

@@doctorsnuggles3299 amazing times

He sounds like mosad agent

Auzubillah this man rlly be hurting this Ummah with stuff like this man

@aaliyah3037

2 жыл бұрын

Good. The ummah should wake up. Sufism is a deviant sect

@eyessmile6173

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaliyah3037 u just said good ab hurting the Ummah. U have lost the plot

@aaliyah3037

2 жыл бұрын

@@eyessmile6173 Carra de Vaux's (may the curse of Allah be upon him) overall conclusion is that it is only by destroying the inner unity of Islam that European colonialism can achieve its goal of complete domination. In this spirit, he makes his formal proposal: "In a word, we must segment Islam. Then we can take advantage of its heresies and [Sufi] brotherhoods." If implemented carefully, these policies would "weaken Islam, make it restless, numb it, and render it forever incapable of great awakening."

@aaliyah3037

2 жыл бұрын

@@eyessmile6173 Maybe go research some works of the colonial orientalists then you'd know that sufism is being promoted by the disbelievers to weaken islam from the inside. And deep down you know there's a huge difference in aqeeda and manhaj between the ottoman empire and the caliphate Rashidun (companions, who we are commanded to follow). The ummah can only be rectified by calling people back to the correct understanding of Islam.

Moreover the person and the army about whom the Prophet Muhammad PBUH had made praising comments cannot do any big sin and must be good Muslims in general. The scholar seems to be prejudiced. The extremist on both sides those who unnecessarily criticize both Ottomans and Musleh Abdul Wahab are wrong. It doesn't seem appropriate at all to support or get support of British to topple the Islamic Khilafat whether by the Arabs or by the Ottomans. It were the Ottomans who went upto Vienna in Europe. Islam expanded during their times.

@owaismansuri8831

2 жыл бұрын

He's not a scholar.

ottoman defended islam for 700 years. ottoman worship Allah.

Allahu Akbar that’s all I can say after watching this

How does that prove it wasn't the ottomans the prophet was talking about?

@Inspire2786

2 жыл бұрын

You did not provide sufficent proof for your statement, you rushed through it to cover your lack of proof

@osman7240

2 жыл бұрын

Sheikh imran hosein brother check him out

@osman7240

2 жыл бұрын

@@Inspire2786 check out the the conquest of constantinople by him.

@jabedrahman9266

2 жыл бұрын

@@osman7240 that man hates turks yet licks Russian boots 😂😂 he's not the right man for hadith interpretation. Whereas I've been listening to dawah man since 14 (23 now) I don't agree with everything he said here because historically it's not very accurate but he is very knowledgeable.

@itookurmomlastnight6089

2 жыл бұрын

@@osman7240 murtad "Sheikh"🤣

Alhamdulillah for Salafiyyah. No emotion is dalil to me. Only Naql is dalil to me.

@hakksrr1043

10 ай бұрын

Nothing is dalil to you! Your 'sudur' had became stone, no emotion, no naql, nothing to understood by you.

As a salafi brother this is severely inaccurate and bias. They attack the ottomans but never said anything about the other caliphates like the ummayids and the abassid that spread to African that killed and enslave and murdered many Africans Muslims and non Muslims from them under the disguise that they was spreading Islam but was enslaving them unjustly but when they went to Asia that wasn’t the same case with lighter skin people like the Indonesian, and they said they accepted Islam by the nice manners of the Arab traders and hood character but when they went to Africa and the Shem region the enslave Africans and Israelites

To be clear He is not saying that the Ottoman empire is all bad But The Ottoman Sultan was overthrowed by the Committee of Union and Progress They did so many bad things in the name of the Ottoman Empire They secularized the goverment They overthrew the sultan They caused the liberalism and wihdatul wujud(ibnul Arabi) to spread And they murdered Armenians

Also there no longer exists constantinople.. its now istanbul so ur theory is out there You either disbelieve the hadith or you accept the fact that Muhammad Fateh opened constantinople by God's grace

@al-quran8349

2 жыл бұрын

Not really, the hadith means the AREA of constatinople Alot of people have no knowledge on the ottoman empire, but because they held the flag of Islam they defend without knowledge, yes they held Islam for the Muslim may Allah grant them forgiveness, however for you to say the prophet of Allah praised Muhammed fateh is like saying the prophet praised an innovator, and if you say the prophet praised an innovator you've attributed one of the worst things you can

@shiney94

2 жыл бұрын

@@al-quran8349 You don't even understand what innovation is If people like you existed during the time of the prophet then there would be no islam as you would stop progress by saying its innovation Do you know who the prophet ridiculed in hadiths? It was the bedouins Why? Because they were ignorant and ready to cut the heads off people for simple disagreements That is what wahabism is It is a cancer of islam; and it needs to be stopped See how you guys say 'enocurage the good and forbid the evil' This is a commandment of quran; and hence we need to forbid the evil which is wahabism The religion that hijacks the beauty of islam and uses its name to commit attrocities and to ruin peoples lives and to remove hope from a believer. May Allah (swta) keep us away from such hypocrisy

@mehmetemintatl1678

2 жыл бұрын

@@al-quran8349 Look at me Arab!!! I'm Turkish, I don't talk to Fatih Sultan Mehmet Khan Not, I wouldn't make Fatih talk about any Turkish Khan. How are you infidel? You would like it if there was a cross in Istanbul But already Tonyukuk said my vizier is good (Göktürk) my vizier The Turk has no brother and friend other than the Turk. 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇺🇿🇰🇬🇰🇿🇹🇲🇭🇺🤘🤘💙💪💪 We don't need you anymore

@al-quran8349

2 жыл бұрын

@@shiney94 @ShineyM it's not an innovation to tell people what their doing is an innovation, yes I'll admit some people are to strict and too hard and too extreme when it comes to forbidding evil no doubt your right in that sense akhi, however it NEEDS to be said that what people are doing is wrong, Wallahi I'm no wahhabi, I'm a person who follows what the hadith say and not what 2/3 scholars say, I go by the ijma' of the companions and their students. yes when it comes to forbidden evil and encouraging good it has to be done In a respectable manner and brother thats hurtful to say, Wallahi if I lived during the times of the companions my lips would be sealed and my ears would be open and my heart would be wide, I understand you meant no harm my brother but be careful in the wording, may Allah reward you akhi and give us all an understanding especially me since I'm worst than all of you here.

@al-quran8349

2 жыл бұрын

@@mehmetemintatl1678 brother I don't understand and I'm no Arabic ikhwani but may Allah reward you for your intentions but brother I advice you be careful in wording, some people have soft hearts and some things which you said can be hurtful for some people.

I swear by Allaah ﷻ you lied regarding Syria and Yemen, As Shaykh Sulayman Ibn Sahman (one of the imams of the najdi dawah) said: And fitnah is Kufr, and if the people of the village and the valley were to fight until they all died, then this would undoubtedly be better than setting up a taghut that rules in contradiction to the Shariah of Allaah ﷻ, that Allaah ﷻ sent His Rasuul ﷺ with.

Sultan Mehmed was a just ruler and promoted sharia and tolerance of the people of the book and when his janissary military pillaged Constantinople mehmed never ordered for this to happen and he even felt guilt at this point if mehmed lived longer he would have fulfilled his destiny to becoming Qaiser e rüm

This guy wallah if ever i have a chance id make sure you doesn't see the next day

@mysticminority9060

7 ай бұрын

So you would kill a muslim?

I respect this brothers passion but again it seem like his knowledge and akeedah is insipired by abdul wahab who once again has lead one of the main extreme views on Islam. May Allah give u guidance and me too.

@macdadibnomar

2 жыл бұрын

Mohammad ibn abdul wahab was a great scholar and was very misunderstood. The scholars know him only for his good. Btw Imran(guy on the video) made an entire video on who Mohammad ibn Abdul Wahhab was and misconceptions of him

@macdadibnomar

2 жыл бұрын

Ibn othaymeen,sheikh Othman al khamees and many more bear witness on the goodness of Mohammad ibn and al wahhab and have said the evils said on him are false accusations that have no legitimate proof

@SoggyBiscuitPro

2 жыл бұрын

Abdul Wahhab is an extremist because he condemned Shirk and Bid'ah ?

@unloved1827

2 жыл бұрын

Cry

@iamjustaguy12345

2 жыл бұрын

@@macdadibnomar ibn abdul wahabb was strongly condemned by many scholars of his time

He said people who follow salfism go far😂 like which ones iv'e never heard of any. However the world remembers names like Ibn al arabi who was dubbed "shaykh al akbar" tbe greatest of all shaykhs. I can't believe people like dawah man are still talking about sects and division rather than finding ways to set aside differences and bring the ummah together🤦‍♂️. Doesn't the quran say "Hold on to the rope of Allah and do not be divided amongst yourselves".

@syafiqmalek8313

2 жыл бұрын

ibn arabi from sufism invented wahdatul wujud stuffs, he is not shaykh al akbar, if they really want to unite, come back to the way of sunnah

@ViralSportsTV397

2 жыл бұрын

Dawahboy UK very own DIY scholar

@al-quran8349

2 жыл бұрын

The qur'an also says command good and forbid evil, the only problem with issues and the main problem is aqeedah, when the aqeedah is right so is everything else in deen. Brother the prophet said there will be 73 sects of my ummah which will all go to jahannam except 1. Meaning one GROUp will go to jannah so people focus on their aqeedah since they want to get into jannah.

@al-quran8349

2 жыл бұрын

And that's the issue, yes the qur'an says don't be divided amongst yourselfs but it's also other groups who are trying to divide the ummah, for example shia say don't follow sahaba etc, warning against evil one must do since its Islam not mathematics.

@amsakkejha3827

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah exactly. Hold on to THE ROPE OF ALLAH and be not divided. You people advocate holding on to EACH OTHER and have nothing to do with the rope of Allah.

But sultan abdul hamid and Osman Gazi may Allah grant them Jannah did great service for Islam

The Ottomans are going to return and re establish the Caliphate and I hope you live to see this

@LutiMikodi

Ай бұрын

Will they have blue and pink hair 😂 your country in becoming pro LGBTQ. Weaklings

@SlaveOfAllah1000

Ай бұрын

Stop being delusional . Just take a look at turkey. So many athiests

@TheMonotheist1744

Ай бұрын

Sure once you pay the Saudis their money back can’t even clear your own debts mate

The language being used by some brothers and sisters in this comment section is shocking. There’s nothing wrong with correcting or disagreeing with the brother. However, we will all be held accountable on the day we return to our Lord. So please refrain from using such disgusting language.

@murthe-wise535

Жыл бұрын

He and his neo salafi and madkhali creatures are bastards! They are made by Arabs to protect their leadership. These two sects must be banned from the Muslim world. This guy's video has opened my eyes

Asalamu’alyakum Akhi are you able to do a episode on this topic as there’s much to discuss. However, yes you are right there were many bad aspects of the empire which were brushed on the sun. But you can’t take anything away from the red 🍎

Does that make sense

He is In a room with no one In there lol good actor this guy

This is what you are doing MR.SHEIKH Tawriya: New Islamic Doctrine Permits 'Creative Lying' Perhaps you have heard of taqiyya, the Muslim doctrine that allows lying in certain circumstances, primarily when Muslim minorities live under infidel authority. Now meet tawriya, a doctrine that allows lying in virtually all circumstances-including to fellow Muslims and by swearing to Allah-provided the liar is creative enough to articulate his deceit in a way that is true to him. (Though tawriya is technically not "new"-as shall be seen, it has been part of Islamic law and tradition for centuries-it is certainly new to most non-Muslims, hence the need for this exposition and the word "new" in the title.)

Really looking forward to this series Inshaa Allah, we hear so many good things about the Ottoman Empire I had no clue about the things you mentioned in this video, I can't wait Inshaa Allah

@mok1982

2 жыл бұрын

He's lying, why don't he bring evidence

@Name-jz4fb

2 жыл бұрын

Mo K the audacity of accusing a Muslim of lying, you should be ashamed of yourself

@mok1982

2 жыл бұрын

@@Name-jz4fb 🙉🧐🤣

@mok1982

2 жыл бұрын

@@Name-jz4fb also the audacity of making takfeer on the whole ottoman empire is shameful.

@Name-jz4fb

2 жыл бұрын

Mo K you be will held accountable for what you said

There's a hadeeth where prophet Adam pbuh was presented his children and he saw one he really liked (David pbuh) and the angel told him that is one of your children from the end of times. So how can imran in this video say sultan muhammad al fatih is not from the end of times hadeeth, the hadeeth mentions a second conquring.

This person has the creed of the people who gave our holy lands to the crusaders with their own hands by backstabbing their fellow muslim brothers. We still living the pain of that mistake in Palestine. Brothers never make the same mistakes our grandfathers did. This is fitnah. And they were not worshipping the graves this is a propaganda.

People like this self proclaimed scholar want us to forget our sense of community and our history. They work for the enemies of this ummah.

@blueberrycoy

2 жыл бұрын

He is not a self proclaimed scholar. If you want to correct him on something you disagree with, you can kindly do so without calling a brother in Islam an enemy of this ummah. May Allah guide us and him.

@doctorsnuggles3299

2 жыл бұрын

@@blueberrycoy So its ok for -dawah- man to defame the ottoman empire but not for someone else to critisize him❓ #doublestandard

@aaliyah3037

2 жыл бұрын

No sufis work for the enemies of Islam

@user-dz2vn8yv1b

2 жыл бұрын

@@doctorsnuggles3299 #standard. All excuses for Saudi's liberalisation but iron fist for everyone else.

@user-dz2vn8yv1b

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaliyah3037 british amnesia

Every Empire had had to kill the brother what does better of their Empire you don't know Muhammad talked about Mehmet fatih❤

They allowed that law to avoid civil war which thousands will die

Wow horrible. A lot of double standards my brother, and you can't make takfeer (takfeer!!) on the entire Ottoman Empire wow, they did so many good even though some of them made mistakes. What about the atrocities committed by Saudi? By Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab? One exemple, Saudi organized A CONCERT in the holy land... when will you address that? Disappointing

@syafiqmalek8313

2 жыл бұрын

alhamdulillah syeikh muhammad ibn acdul wahab help delete the ottomans

@shiney94

2 жыл бұрын

@@syafiqmalek8313 That bastard did not delete anything except he has forbidden jannah for himself Because jahanam is the place of munafiqs

@itookurmomlastnight6089

2 жыл бұрын

@@shiney94 astagfirullah repent to Allah for slandering the big Ulema in this modern time, not suprised if you're a Barelvi or naqshabandi

@hasan623

2 жыл бұрын

@@shiney94 Fear Allah, for He might forbid you paradise for the words you have uttered.

@hasan623

2 жыл бұрын

@@itookurmomlastnight6089 As-salamu aleykum, I'd advise changing your username

I am a scholar of Middle Eastern History, in fact I am working for my PhD in “Geopolitics of the Near East” - So, while I don’t disagree with much of your theological points (as I am a fellow Muslim myself, who is also against much of the past Ottoman rule in regards to the way they handled Islam) … But either way, I would like you to debate me (lets record it) if you think Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab was a good man and a good representation of Islam - because through my YEARS of studies, I will tell you historical facts about al-Wahhab that will make say “o, I didn’t know that”, just like your telling your students right here in this video - And trust me, you don’t know all of it, though you may believe you know the “ins and outs” of al-Wahhab - Much of the information, or in other words, many of the manuscripts and other historical artifacts pertaining to this very particular subject you would need to be a scholar in this very field of history just to be able to dig into the still thriving and living facts of the situation, thats always put away for MA scholars or higher in various University libraries (which I find ridiculous by the way Nd unfair, as I think all information should be available to the public - its sad that they make parts of academia a “members club” if you will)… Nevertheless, it is not the type of stuff that you can find just on the internet, unless you subscribe and pay for some academic databases for various journals and see who has written works on these subjects (and obviously check the author before going further, because many scholars may have a bias against our din, our religion, whether they are right or wrong, they usually will use stuff like this to make our entire faith “look bad” as a whole) But 1) I hope and assume you can read Arabic fluently - and if so, I would hope you already read his main treatise/manuscript that is online for free - and then 2) if your bright enough (which I am sure you are), I would like for you to dig deeper and show me the two ahādith that were COMPLETELY fabricated…. Then next, tell me what al-Wahhab said Muhammad (saw) said in his letter to Munzir (which was a complete lie…. but I bet Abd al-Wahhab did not know the letter was still alive during his time period for people to see for themselves) - because yes, he lied on our very own Prophet - changed his words DRASTICALLY in one spot, that changed the whole context of what he was saying- and yes, 97% of what al-Wahhab mentions, I agree with tbh - but his three most radical stances just happen to be the three “coincidental” areas that are 100% made up THEN - since I am a “Historian” - rather than a scholar of Islam itself - I will tell you 100% facts on the atrocities he help to commit that he justified since they were in “his” mind kafirs - in fact, he historically in his own very words said if anyone does not believe those controlling the Hijaz region are Mushirks (OR even if they were “undecided”) then he called Takfir on them as well, not just those deviating…… it goes deep with him and his gang, his pal Sau’d, etc. - Trust me - don’t look up to that man - don’t believe me, then lets debate - and not on “theology” but rather the “history” of al-Wahhab Remember… “actions speak louder than words” - and Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab at-tamimi was the epitome of proving that statement when it came down to the real grit of things

@TheGEOPOLITICAN

2 жыл бұрын

@@rahatahmed6188 unfortunately it is his name …. Because sure his first name (birth name، his ism) is “Muhammad” …. but is Nasab in full is: ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab ibn Sulayman ibn Ali ibn Muhammad (ibn Ahmad) ibn Rāshid So, to say thats “not his name” indicates you simply don’t understand the basic fundamentals of an Arab and Islamic name via heritage - between the first name (the Ism obviously) to the Nasab to the Laqab, etc… Now is it his fault that his name is attached to one of Allah’s (swt) name/attributes ? no - but to say its not in his name is both nonsensical and fallacious - or just straight ignorant

@jabedrahman9266

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheGEOPOLITICAN brother do u have Instagram where I can message u to learn more? I'm interested in learning bro

@doctorsnuggles3299

2 жыл бұрын

Im also interested in ur study about the wahabi movement

@tariqaslam1853

2 жыл бұрын

@@rahatahmed6188 So if someone is called Rahman he has to change his name too? I want to learn too.

@macdadibnomar

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheGEOPOLITICAN no your wrong you just proved you are ignorant his name isn’t “al wahhab” it’s “Abdul-wahhab” there is a huge difference. One saying he is “al wahhab” and the other saying he is the servant of “al wahhab”

Man said the prophet Ali mentioned it

U boys dis sheikh nazim

@TheMonotheist1744

Ай бұрын

Without a doubt you are not suppose to like kuffar

I think you should be just

Who killed the famius journalist Jamal who support Israel.

@ok-km4bw

2 жыл бұрын

Dawah man Khabees man

He would of got slapped up if man said that infront of me lol someone send him Riyadh

Muslims don't invade Muslims but Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi was Great because he invaded Muslim territories Great Logic 👏

@TheMonotheist1744

10 ай бұрын

No he didn’t lol

IMAM Abdulwahab was not perfect either. Only prophet mohamed was perfect.

We are striving to Seek for the truth everyday, JazakhAllah for this upload.

@outofservice5438

2 жыл бұрын

"The truth is more worthy to be followed"

@phenomcollege4188

2 жыл бұрын

Confirm things before believing them. Don't be gullible. He has made some unsubstantiated claims. Be careful

@youtubeaccount9289

2 жыл бұрын

@@phenomcollege4188 bro use your brain what is the worse crime to Allah? Shirk? Yes it is and the ottomans were full of that

@aaliyah3037

2 жыл бұрын

Sufis hate islam

@aaliyah3037

2 жыл бұрын

@Salman Siddique Carra de Vaux's (may the curse of Allah be upon him) overall conclusion is that it is only by destroying the inner unity of Islam that European colonialism can achieve its goal of complete domination. In this spirit, he makes his formal proposal: "In a word, we must segment Islam. Then we can take advantage of its heresies and [Sufi] brotherhoods." If implemented carefully, these policies would "weaken Islam, make it restless, numb it, and render it forever incapable of great awakening."

Some wahabis were khawarij rebelling against ottoman khilaafa

@mohammed9w553

Жыл бұрын

Hahahahaha , it's the ottoman empire that allied with the french and the british to destroy the first saudi state , they are traitors and murtads , shame on you for defending them. Mohammed Ibn Abdul wahhab being an agent of british is a lie made by them to hide their own betrayel with the french and the british.

@mehmetibrahim1227

11 ай бұрын

​@@mohammed9w553what about Lawrence of Arabia?

@mohammed9w553

11 ай бұрын

@@mehmetibrahim1227 What about him ? That happened a 100 years later with Sheriff Hussein and not with Saudis. I'm talking about the first Saudi state and its wars with the ottoman empire and specifically Mohammed Ali Pasha , the ottoman empire received help from the french and the british in this war and then they called Mohammed Ibn Abdul Wahab an agent of british to hide their own betrayel.

@mehmetibrahim1227

11 ай бұрын

@@mohammed9w553 lol I don't say that Muhammad bin Abdul wahab is agent of British I'm saying about betreyal and with the help of Lawrence you guys literally sold Palestine to Western . In ottoman empire they never sell any Muslim land and if you guys really believe in hadiths and then why don't you all end monarchy rule in Arabia? Is monarchy a Islamic rule ? Hell no Monarchy is not from Islam it from Persians and Romans . And when imam Hasan A.S and give leadership (caliphate) their were some conditions like leadership will be on shura ? Why don't you follow this ?

@TheMonotheist1744

10 ай бұрын

@@mohammed9w553 ibrahim ali pasa brought his masters with him when he came to kill the people of diriyyah they were french, British and Italians lol

Truth, huh? In the afterlife, you will see the truth, no worries. And you better watch out where you are

جزاك الله خيرًا، الله يحفظك أستاذ.

@user-dx8eh2vc5r

2 жыл бұрын

@@Musa-sg8ih الله اكبر

@turkishmauser1174

Жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/Z4Gp3NaBqbWzqaQ.html

You are not a scholar man.

@blueberrycoy

2 жыл бұрын

I don’t think he ever claimed he was a scholar.

@muammar1353

2 жыл бұрын

@@blueberrycoy he hasn't

@suluklu

2 жыл бұрын

@@muammar1353 he sounds like a paid agent :) pin pointing events to spread hate.. do you hear him ' look at these people (turkic ppl) ' wow man his burning with hatred god guide us and this clown too

this guy has never been my cup of tea and this video further solidifies why he isn't

May be he is right but no one can't ignore the fact that ottomans did many good things for Islam and they had many good sultans like Sultan Abdul Hamid second and guys this world is grey the era of rashiduuin is gone and if thinks a ruler to be like Hazrat Umar it is not possible

Yes please. Would love a video on detail on the real history

@staticshock9788

Жыл бұрын

Yeah don’t trust this guy. He is preaching the Wahhabism Dawah which is riddled with false beliefs. They follow MIAW instead of direct companions of the Prophet. Zaynul Abideen. Abu dawood, imam Ahmad, imam Jaffar As-Siddiq. These are the true salaf. These people come over 1400 years later call them selves salafi but would never quote or accept what the direct companions of Rasulallah SAW. They follow, MIAW, ibn taymiyah, and the likes.

Salaam Too many mistakes to be taken seriously.

I would rather follow the ottomans than the Saudi regime any day. What has saudi done for palestine. Because of Saudi wahabi ideology the whole muslim world is disunited. The ottomans were great.

@TheMonotheist1744

Ай бұрын

Hurrems? Armenian genocide? Diriyah genocide? Music? Get out of here

brother wearing an Arab dress but has an Indian accent

I've watched all 5 seasons! Learned a lot about ottomans, and I'm learning in school about these empires and I stumped upon this question the other day of how is it halal to kill ur brothers as kings just to eliminate competition? and write now here, u are questioning too!! Im shocked and cant believes this!

@user-dz2vn8yv1b

2 жыл бұрын

It isn't halal. No empire was perfect.

@nightblades6239

2 жыл бұрын

The ottomans did what they did to stop the civil war no one is claiming it to be halal rather it was done to stop another ottoman civil war that has happened in the past

@excel5586

Жыл бұрын

I agree it’s not halal but if your brothers are causing fitnah and the empire is In danger because of them then it is permissible to kill them

@ardakaraca9099

8 ай бұрын

many Islamic scholars have approved the killing of brothers to ascend to the throne

Funny how its a tawheed issue but some in the comments dont get it. Whatever good you do dont matter if you come with SHIRK. If you see ppl emphasizing tawheed, then know thats the dawah of the prophets and if you see ppl taking tawheed as something light and are deep in shirk, that's falsehood.

@mikailshakes4514

2 жыл бұрын

What sort of Shirk ?

@hamzaali4983

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikailshakes4514 the grave worshipping, supplications to saints, saying Allah himself is present with his creation and is everywhere etc

@mikailshakes4514

2 жыл бұрын

@@hamzaali4983 Saying God is everywhere is the belief of the jahmiyya not the Sunnis and the act of supplication is not directly asking for them rather it is a path

@hamzaali4983

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikailshakes4514 i meant supplications to DEAD righteous ppl is shirk. Asking them for help and seeking refuge in them due to their status.

@mikailshakes4514

2 жыл бұрын

@@hamzaali4983 Do you have proof ?

Previously with the Ottoman only Salah in the masjid and tawaf of the Kabah was the commom pratice. Thanks to saudi and abdul wahab, we can now party in jeddah. Are you coming for the next concert? You have the potential to perform as a clown

@ytvidentvidytent1777

2 жыл бұрын

@سلفي ومتبع Know where and from whom you are taking your knowledge.Zanadiqa seriously. Stop listening to this clown.He should rename his channel jahalah session.

@johnanderson4710

2 жыл бұрын

@Warrior 92 Saladin never made pilgrimages what’s ur point?

Why you referring a word sunnah to some kind of ruler …Sunnah is only act that comes from prophet (pbuh) …

Myself being of turkish descent i would really like to watch the series because we just hear good things about the empire. Time to listen from another perspective and confront some of theese things the ottomans did

@turkishsalafi9819

2 жыл бұрын

Allah senden razi olsun. Finally someone that doesn't love the Ottomans over and above the kitab and Sunnah. The Ottomans no doubt gave safety and propsperity for the Muslims in the dunyawi lifestyle, but their manhaj and aqeedah destroyed peoples Tawheed. It didn't start after the Tanzimat, look at Kanuni Sultan Suleiman bin Selim, his right hand mufti Ebu Suud efendi created a new code of law "the Kanun Laws" to rule with OTHER THAN THE SHARIA. Only an ignorant Muslim would look at the ottomans and believe they were on the haqq. Muslims have become desperate, this desperation is resorting into us thinking with emotion, not with kitab and sunnah which is reason.

@KGD564

2 жыл бұрын

@@turkishsalafi9819 to love or hate or bring critic over the ottomans my Knowledge is too little akhi. So i would be glad to watch the upcoming series

@turkishsalafi9819

2 жыл бұрын

@@KGD564 I don't hate the Ottomans, I simply hate the people who defend them blindly. MIAW was correct in his aqeedah and he didn't do something unislamic.

@KGD564

2 жыл бұрын

@Dhuku turk dont wants to be ruled by a kurd is true. The ottoman leaders dont wanted to be ruled by their own brothers. Crazy

@KGD564

2 жыл бұрын

@@UltimateFreekickerzdok yanee demek istiyorsun ki Bazi osmanli sultanlar kendi Kardeslerini öldürtmediler? Hocalar bile Söylüyolar

May Allah reward you and grant you more beneficial knowledge

@mikailshakes4514

2 жыл бұрын

May Allah also guide him

Basically We are surrounded by hypocrites sauds and ottomans one is destoying the sacred land One was commiting shirk

Did he or did not start it of. 🙄

@Solo786i

2 жыл бұрын

Unsure form the very start