So no one else is wondering how the actress who played Martha nailed Fiona so perfectly despite never meeting her? Maybe by listening to 350 hours of voice messages????!!!

@itsx0aliciadaatea

12 күн бұрын

Exactly

@nics3655

12 күн бұрын

The actress did not nail fiona's ways at all. The accent?.. mostly but not totally, the fat?.. yes, the hair? kinda.. the mannerisms? Not at all.

@lauraspell9749

12 күн бұрын

I was referring to her general lunacy. I thought she nailed it. An English woman faking a Scottish accent isn’t ever going to be 100%, but we saw a Fiona that was trying to not act like Martha I’m sure, and it was still spot on.

@trishbrims

12 күн бұрын

I don’t think she could have possibly nailed her mannerisms if she had never seen her before .. and only going off audio .. she did an amazing job in her unstable personality though

@Ann-qf5vk

12 күн бұрын

Brilliant

But No one named her? Richard Gadd didn't name her, Netflix didn't name her, the only person that truly 'Outed' her was herself.

@annelowe2691

11 күн бұрын

Exactly what I think!

@nicoleferlazzo6591

9 күн бұрын

100% correct

@AdBlu111

8 күн бұрын

She was outed by internet ‘sleuths’ based on the exact words on Twitter, as used on the show, I.e no attempt was made by Netflix to anonymise her. She then started to get hate mail online which then gave her cause to come forward and defend herself.

@havasubooo8840

7 күн бұрын

@@AdBlu111 she didn't have to say it was her when she was getting hate mail...she's the one who came forward...

@DansManCaveUK

7 күн бұрын

They used exact quotes that were easily searched

If anything I think Richard Gadd needs an award for writing with his depiction and story telling. He isn’t saying she’s a terrible person, and he for sure isn’t saying he is a perfect person- I think he has every right to share his story.

@johnmccann5104

11 күн бұрын

I wonder if she will sell a sequel once the whole thing ends......double whammy for Netflix if she does😉🇬🇧

@julest5767

6 күн бұрын

100%

@AdBlu111

5 күн бұрын

Except he cannot prove it is true (convictions, physical assault, sexual assault, harassment of his parents etc), thus he shows Fiona in a very bad way, which is defamation.

@SarahS-zq8ru

8 сағат бұрын

@@AdBlu111 in the series, he never mentions or depicts “Fiona” / the character is named Martha. He and none of the producers have ever disclosed names, so as far as privacy goes, nobody disclosed any real names, nor has anyone confirmed that this woman Fiona coming forward has anything to do with the story. She’s the only breaking the confidentiality, pointing the finger/ doxing herself. The case will cost her more than it’s worth…

For a person with a "photgraphic memory" she forgot quite a bit.

@coop6835

7 күн бұрын

Yes a selective photographic memory 😂

I also believe she's unwell. Sent from my iphone.

@user-jv8wr2mk3i

12 күн бұрын

Asd. I have a stalker who is scarily similar

@africo9104

10 күн бұрын

🤣😅😂

@thevoidisshining

9 күн бұрын

Lmao

@thevoidisshining

9 күн бұрын

She's scary. Snet from my iphnoe

I love how she „din’t watch the show“ but she is watching everything about it.

Fiona is living her best life with all the attention she gets

@zoezwar9911

12 күн бұрын

She’s loving every minute of it!

@HanChap2

11 күн бұрын

And all the fresh meat she can now stalk! And she can blame her new victims by saying they helped everyone stalk her

She had not only 4-6 emails but she also has MULTIPLE Facebook accounts! That IS NOT NORMAL!

@jowallace4986

10 күн бұрын

Not to mention that she appears to have changed her name at least twice

@rsh793

7 күн бұрын

Hmmm it's probably not too unlikely - I have several emails - for work, for business, for personal, for being too lazy to shut them down and tell people ..... same with FB pages - I quickly opened a second one when a knob at where I was working reported one of our colleagues for daring to go out and buy a loaf of bread when she was off sick one day - I mean, god forbid that she shouldn't starve when too sick to work! So I pretty much recommend people have a "friends and family" and a "work" FB page ... The name thing is a bit bizarre - but many folks that age took on double barrelled when they got married - it's not clear if she did or not - and then would drop down to one - or keep their maiden name for work purposes coz it's easier .... I'm not giving her a free rein - and I've got to admit, I'm far too normal and lazy to ever set up an email account to stalk someone from and send that many messages - and holy poo - I'd never send them from a phone - you can tell when I'm writing on the computer or on a phone just from the length - but then maybe I'm just too lazy to put this much effort into doing anything that's mean-spirited and nasty ....(and I'm too nice!) Not sent on my iPhone

You know your doing good when Piers wants to bring you back AWESOME job Andy🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

@Twinkle_Toes88

12 күн бұрын

I’m so happy for you Andy!! Awesome job!! 🎉❤

@littlebobas9656

12 күн бұрын

He looked ridiculous. Shaking his head, throwing his arms up....and you can tell he wasn't aware of any information surrounding the parliamentary committee meeting. He went in very unprepared. He was on a panel with Piers, 2 lawyers and 2 journalists...one of those journalists has been closely covering this subject and knows a lot more than Andy does yet Andy was quite rude about him and his findings.

@maggiebaker6899

11 күн бұрын

@@littlebobas9656 I was excited to see Andy invited back, but rather disappointed in what he had to say.

@rsh793

7 күн бұрын

Yes - I found the total lack of knowledge disappointing really - at the very least he should have prepared himself in knowing the basics - like the UK is not just one country and one legal system and how Parliamentary Committee hearings work - I wouldn't mind so much, but before he went on, I'd mentioned a couple of tiny corrections in his comments before and, whilst I appreciate that no-one has time to read their comments, I wasn't the only one - and it would have stopped him looking quite so ignorant. LOL plus, being asked to be on Piers is rather like being asked to the opening of an envelope - a low low bar ....and one has to weigh up whether or not one wants to lose one's reputation by not walking over it!

Fiona went to Piers for two reasons: 1. She wanted her 15 minutes of fame cause she could have distanced herself and it would have died soon enough. 2. She probably knows she can get money since they wrote “it’s a true story”. I agree with you Andy. She is not a victim.

@Ann-qf5vk

12 күн бұрын

Absolutely

@smoothsailin9351

12 күн бұрын

Which court does it end up in if she's a Scottish citizen, living in England, suing a US entity who's story they bought from a Scottish citizen also residing in England? And who's laws do they get to go by?

@antoinettejulianayzelman6361

12 күн бұрын

@@smoothsailin9351 If you're implying she's a foreigner in England, she's not. England and Scotland are both part of the UK.

@smoothsailin9351

12 күн бұрын

​@@antoinettejulianayzelman6361 I know we can reside wherever but our countries are still separate/independent entities, I just don't know to the degree they'd be separate in this scenario. Like, I'm just really curious which court this would end up in because the issue ties in 3 countries - who's laws the case would go by? Like does it take place where she lives because she's the defendant or does it take place where ever Netflix is because they'd be the respondent? OH! And also, I wonder in which country are any charges relevant?

@flywheel8541

12 күн бұрын

Don't forget the book deal she might be offered.

I hate what a hypocritical world we live in. They’re all saying she’s innocent till proven guilty while condemning Netflix and Richard. Um…hello do they not deserve the same due process???

Well she admitted having 4-6 email accounts and 4 phones…so the likelihood of her having several Facebook and other social accounts are VERY likely. That’s textbook stalker type behaviour. Remember, stalking is not isolated to physical stalking. Stalking through emails, socials, etc is a very real thing.

“I’ll say it if you’re all afraid to!!” 😂😅❤

@Twinkle_Toes88

12 күн бұрын

Perfectly done Andy!! 🎉

Streisand effect. Noone knew who the fk she was until she said so

2 major issues: 1. SHE exposed herself to the mainstream. Most people wouldn’t have thought twice about it. The second she went on the PM interview SHE exposed herself to the world. 2. Even to the layman, it was incredibly apparent in the PM interview she was lying. Idk whether she was lying about being a stalker but she WAS lying in what would be easy answers. It had nothing to do with no media training and everything to do with her apparent narcissism. The questions being asked about her and her mental state are NOT bc of the Netflix series, they are from her answers in the PM interview. Im sorry but that’s completely on her.

She volunteered to go on Piers Morgan therefore she outed herself also who has 6 email addresses I have one for everything absolutely mental

@smoothsailin9351

12 күн бұрын

Not defending her but against my desire to have zero, I've been mandated to have a normal personal email address, a burner email for all the spam/shopping confirmation shite to end up, two work emails (one for each clinic I work at), a student email (having returned to uni), and when I got my phone about 4 years ago it required me to create a gmail email address. I'm sure she doesn't have them in the same reasonable context LOL but reasonable or not it's still mental 🤣where is my freedom to have zero emails! Don't get me started on MFA either 🤣

@smoothsailin9351

12 күн бұрын

it's the 4 phones thing that I found particularly red-flaggy !!

Mark Garagos said that just because she’s stalking and harassing doesn’t mean she’s a criminal (paraphrasing). Stalking and harassing ARE criminal behavior. They are against the law. That doesn’t mean she was convicted but if she sent all of the emails, and calls and tweets, if she followed him and made his life hell, here in the great state of Mississippi, that’s criminal. Maybe not in the UK or CA where Mark is based but most places it is.

@arc8584

12 күн бұрын

In Cali its still illegal, its just hard to get it taken seriously. In fact most stalking and harassment cases are hard to have taken seriously until its too late.

@harryhill8543

12 күн бұрын

shes on a police watch list of stalkers in the uk.

@Moon133.

11 күн бұрын

So true. The burden of proof to prosecute in the UK is so much, so the police know it’s happening but can’t charge. It’s apparently only 1.4% that actually get convicted.

She has mental issues but she is not a victim!! The people that she stalked and victimized are the true victims!!!!! Serial killers have mental issues but no says they are the victims!!!! 🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️

To address the situation, Netflix could simply deny Fiona Harvey's claim of being the real Martha. For Fiona Harvey to succeed, she would need to prove that all the allegations in the show are true for her character. If she managed to do so, it would validate Netflix's portrayal as a true story, rendering the entire debate moot.

@rwaneuin6259

12 күн бұрын

It's interesting to see what Netflix will do. Gadd has not confirmed who the real person is.

@georginafronda496

12 күн бұрын

Thanks for say it. It really is that simple she has to prove it…

@daniellebennett6449

10 күн бұрын

Agreed. I think that is why Gadd and Netflix have not acknowledged she is the real Martha. They can't say anything or she really will have a case.

@BrynSmith76

10 күн бұрын

If Netflixp lawyers say it's not about Fiona. Fiona's lawyers will just argue that Netflix used her tweets to Gadd world for word. They could question them who else could it possibly be about but Fiona, when all the other softer evidence points to it being her as well.

@SarahS-zq8ru

10 күн бұрын

The character’s name in the series is Martha, her (Fiona’s) name is never mentioned, if she wants to claim defamation, she’s the only one publicly declaring that depiction is of her! So in that case, she’s the one defaming herself by associating or taking claim as being a part of the story. Otherwise nobody would have a clue!

They say based on a true story at the end. Thats the disclaimer. Putting it prior to the 1st episode that is a true story is the hook. The fact they’ve said it once is enough.

@Willie.J

12 күн бұрын

Fargo stated at the beginning (This is a true story) and it was a work of fiction.

@AdBlu111

5 күн бұрын

They don’t say “based on a true story” at the end, only that some names, characters, incidents and locations have been changed. Also, the Netflix executive in a UK parliamentary select committee clearly states “this is a true story about a convicted stalker”, also he states that it was not right to change the events (other than names and minor details) because Richard Gadd has a right to tell his story about his experiences. This is Richard Gadds true story.

She said she went on Piers Morgan as she would get a fair hearing. Now she’s complaining 😮

i told you, when Piers Morgan and a few others sided with her that Netflix didn't cover up her identity, I said they've done well to reveal her to warn future victims. People should worry more about the victims, not the offender

Piers says trolling isn't against the law!! It is - and he should know this : The Malicious Communication's Act England 2010.

I’m just watching this now so I know the pole is gone, but I am team Andy on this she is not a victim

Yes to more Andy on Piers Morgan! I really do not believe she has a case. Between the end credits declaring parts of the story were fictionalized and her other past victims speaking up and confirming that she stalked them, it’s not looking good. There was a comment from someone (just making sure I’m not taking credit for this opinion) that said having Martha plead guilty in the Netflix show actually made her look sympathetic. They gave the impression that she had some amount of remorse as she gave her pleas and cried in court. Fiona is proving that she didn’t deserve that soft blow in the end.

Andy so glad you spoke up. Stalkers are bloody dangerous because they don’t think their behaviour is wrong. I think she’s also feeding of the attention.

1:20 I don’t think Netflix should be blamed for people finding out who she is either since it’s HER tweets that outed her

I am with you. All the way. If she doesn’t want the publicity, then quit being out there. She should have never started this. Like Rip said on Yellowstone, “ There’s always a bigger bear”!!!! Don’t dish it out if you can’t take it!!

My man Andy was the only one who was true to his opinion! Other panels were siding with Piers because they are invited! I commented like that on Piers's youtube then he removed it lol😆

@theresemcnamara-

12 күн бұрын

😳 That is really starting to bug me. These great KZreadrs who say they believe in free speech, fight for free speech and then hide anything they don't like! Then they get away with it by saying I never block anyone. ( I just hide there comment). 🙄

@mymai5859

12 күн бұрын

Agree OP...thank goodness Popcorn Andy was on the panel. My thought is Piers is fishing to bait Fiona back on. She won't get interviewed if she think he's against her.

She’s not a victim and I don’t think the show has to protect her identity. If ppl figure out who she was, she didn’t have to come out and say “it’s me!” You don’t want attention, don’t seek attention.

@fairylin5

11 күн бұрын

100%!!

@britfrie

11 күн бұрын

My thing too is, she is claiming its about her but that it's not about her at the same time... I am very confused.

She won't stop stalking. Give her the spotlight. Expose her.

The way Fiona attacks anyone who dares criticise her (alleged) behaviour just doesn't come across like a mature adult's comments- it's how a child/narcissist would respond, instead of dealing with the accusations she just tries to attack the person, in fact all people watching this. I hope she gets help for her sake and potential future targets she could have (if her alleged stalking is as depicted).

She’s really holding on to the conviction scene. I mean, really? Most of us couldn’t careless about that scene, we care about whether or not she stalked him to that degree. I personally find her vile comments regarding people’s appearance, quite frankly, grotesque.

@MJBsays

11 күн бұрын

Yes!! I really disagreed with Piers' statement about that being a tenet of the story. It really wasn't. When it comes to her, for me tenets to the story were the harassment, the stalking, the emails, voicemails and verbal abuse the character was doing. The court scene seemed like the script closing a loop for storytelling purposes.

@generaljo78

11 күн бұрын

@@MJBsays Totally agree. She’s found and/or been told about something she can go for and now she’s taking her harassment to a courtroom. Did anyone actually fixate on that scene or were they more transfixed by her personality and bizarre mood swings?

@MJBsays

11 күн бұрын

@@generaljo78 exactly. The only people who fixated on that are journalists because they want to milk the story. Also, I commented on PU's channel but will say here too, has anyone considered that the court scene was one of the things that were changed on purpose to conceal the true identity? They changed her name, the pub's name, the length of time the stalking went on for, the media used in sending the messages... the court scene & conviction could have just been another thing changed on purpose to hide the identity. Instead just like Andy said there seems to be a lot of selective reasoning going on. They (Piers & co) choose to ignore certain things but not others.

Everyone is always chasing clout. I really don't care what the actress who didn't get the role of Teri has to say. Nava Mau was PERFECT as Teri. She's one of my favorite parts of the show. I see people saying Jessica was too young to play Martha and I highly disagree. Makeup aged her and after seeing the real 'Martha', Jessica NAILED IT. Without even meeting the real Martha. All the actors were spectacular.

Loving you on piers Morgan show! Keep up the good work Andy 👏 xxx

@johnmccann5104

11 күн бұрын

Morgan does have many interesting guests on with the exception of that Iman women who was on the original...... Thankfully he has now banned her from his show 🇬🇧

Never seen anyone get so chuffed about going on the pierce Morgan show

You are so right!! Well done!

We're in a world now, where it will be spun to make out that she's the victim.

Well done on Piers Morgan - you called her out for being completely bonkers. You said what rest of the panel we were thinking but were too afraid to say. Keep it real m8!

My sister worked with her she was sacked after 2 weeks she then started stalking and harassing the boss all the staff had to be issued with safety alarm’s because of her behaviour

I am so tired of everyone tip toeing around this! Well done for speaking the TRUTH! She did the stalking, shes responsible for her own actions, Why are people getting hung about if she was prosecuted? It said in at the end of the episode where she gets convicted, that the real martha DID NOT get convicted, and she HAS had an injuction taken out against her ( but not by RG). Well done !

I am actually glad that this keeps going. I am hoping that laws and police policies about stalking will get taken more seriously. Domestic violence used to not ever get taken seriously - it used to be a private marital issue - where the police would just show up and usually side with the husband and just tell them to keep the noise level down. It wasn't until Tracey Thurman, who was severely beaten by her husband and left paralyzed, was the 1st woman to sue the city because the police didn't take any complaints seriously that more laws were put into place. There are a number of deaths that have resulted from stalking - so it needs to be taken in the same seriousness.

I'm from England, and it's GREAT to see my favourite KZreadrs Andy and Piers together chatting. Being from the U.K we find it difficult to believe this story has got so big all over the world. Piers needed you on there Andy to say the things he'd love to say. I hope you both talk again. I loved this video. Greetings from the UK. sent from my IPhone 😂😂😂😂

Awesome to see you on Piers ❤👏👏👏😎

Fiona H is like: there is no way I still living in this shitty apartment and meanwhile netflix is getting richer with the minute with my stalking story 😂

She wants the attention. She could have deleted Twitter, FB etc. so that she wouldn't be found.

She is crazy and a cleaver liar….a dangerous combo. You Rock Andy!

Good to see you back on Piers. I can’t wait till H&M do something outrageous /stupid (again) and you are invited back as Andy Signore from Popcorn PALACE 🎉❤

The actress that portrayed her was so on point that Fiona made herself look as crazy as the character in the show.

@victorialynnhickman

12 күн бұрын

1

Hi Andy, wow what is wrong with these people? Can you imagine What that poor man went through whilst she was STOCKING him. WHAT A CONFUSED PERSON. ALLEGEDLY

Your interview on Piers was great and you got her backed into a corner of her own making I believe!!!

Well done in your second Piers appearance - and thanks for the refreshing opinions. I also don’t believe she gets to play victim!

Being rude to people and insulting them is never good. Some of the thinks she said to Starmer were not okay - political views are no excuse for attacking someone's family and harassing them! Being accountable is never a bad thing and admitting when you could have done things differently! Thanks for all your work, Andy - and so happy to see you on Piers!!! ❤❤

1.32 am Wednesday 18th May hi Andy I'm Sarah from the UK, fiona is dangerous nuts and she did it all ,she is capable of anything buddy ❤

It is her burden if she's the one who brings a lawsuit against them is it not? To prove she was lied about and financially damaged by it?

@AdBlu111

5 күн бұрын

No, Netflix will have to prove the events depicted are true, otherwise they will be guilty of defamation. The burden of proof is on the side making the claim that is defamatory otherwise how does someone prove that something did not happen? Very difficult to prove a negative.

I'm a 1...uk...I watched piers... totally agree with you why did she admit it was her?? Delete account etc..... I think she's loving the attention!

Andy, FYI, it’s “PIERS”, not “pierce”. Like you’re talking about multiple docks on the edge of an ocean, not like something you do to your bellybutton.

She won’t sue, and even if she does, she’s not getting 💩

@mymai5859

12 күн бұрын

Agree 💯 %. Can you imagine any lawyer dealing with her, when she thinks she's the most intelligent person in the room. She'd never listen long enough to their advice. They'd say 1 innocent word she wouldn't like , then boom - she'd be stalking & abusing them. By the way she's unemployed now, was unemployed when she was stalking Richard 2014 onwards, unemployed 1997 when she was sacked after less than a week - so she started stalking & abusing lawyer Laura Wray who hired her. Nothing against being unemployed. It's that she spouts being a lawyer but has no references from any law firm.

@babs66

12 күн бұрын

But a lawyer has taken the case.​@@mymai5859

Loved you on Pier's show, I completely agree why on earth hasn't she been held accountable for her harassment of many people over 10+ years. Why should people have to suffer her abuse. I really don't understand Pier's stance on Gadd and him villianizing him.

Life goals.... Becoming someone worth being able to talk to Piers.

@sickens-me

12 күн бұрын

Or both...🤔🤣

@sherrywilliams9334

12 күн бұрын

Your on now

@sherrywilliams9334

12 күн бұрын

Love you Andy This is my favorite ❤

@sherrywilliams9334

12 күн бұрын

LOCK your doors

@sherrywilliams9334

12 күн бұрын

Dont hang them curtains 😅😅😅

Hey, hey now... No stalking the stalker.

I think netflix is sitting back, letting her crucify herself as she is doing

The panel was actually boring me. When you spoke it was a breath of fresh air from the same monotonous statements.

@AdBlu111

8 күн бұрын

Sorry that the panel were boring you with logic, facts, and legal considerations, just go back to popcorn planet where you don’t have to worry about such things.

When you came in I laughed my arse off….it was gold, their faces, I swear you could hear crickets for a second and yes she is completely mad 😂

😮😮😮😮😮She victimizes people (still up to her harmful behavior) , uses fear and intimidation to control and attempt to manipulate others, and called herself out clearly looking for what she feels is her piece of the pie. She is dangerous and should be given the appropriate consequences for trying to exploit the law, the media, and society. Stalking is a CRIME!!😮😮😮😮😮😮

I agree Andy. You were the only dissenter and it was frustrating watching this. I will leave a comment on his show on the value you brought to the discussion. We don’t need a panel where everyone agrees. Where’s the fun and point is in that? And you are right!!!

Her behavior on this interview PROVES that she takes no responsibility for anything - even IF she did nothing wrong legally or ethically, we’re all 100% responsible for our relationships with others and every situation we end up in, regardless of whether we caused it or not. _“My responsibility is limitless. My action is limited.”_ ~Sadhguru

Andy I applaud you for standing up and saying as it is. She is La la la and lies all the time. I cannot wait until the court case

Andy, she has 4 phones and 6 emails. 😱😱🤣🤣🤣🇬🇧

I am sure there are plenty lawyers willing to take her case for free.😀

She is only repeating what she is hearing!!!!! I feel no empathy for her. Why is she all of a sudden the victim?!? Being harassed/stalked is one of the ugliest situations to ever have to go through, I assure you!!

Surely if she is suing then surely she has to prove and provide evidence. K x x

@AdBlu111

8 күн бұрын

No, legally the burden of proof is on Netflix to show the principal facts are true, otherwise it is defamation.

Here’s the thing that I know no one wants to hear lol but Netflix did state some of the story has been dramatized. Yes they said it in the credits; however, that might give Netflix some leeway in being legally responsible for what’s in the series. As far as care to protect her identity, meh yeah people found her based on those tweets but she’s the one that came forward. Also her behaviors since coming forward are really unhinged and proves that she’s unhinged. She’s not doing herself any favors to claim that she’s not a stalker 😂

Andy, she is going to come after you; she stalked a temp in office for 20 years, another lady and her family 18month, the lider of the Labour party with 207 emails in 6month 😮😮😮😮

What ever you do, dont offer her a cup of tea 😂

I watched it because of you and I agree with you. I think she’s a menace who’s probably caused trouble for many people and is not a victim. I’ll instruct Piers to have you back as often as possible. X

Imagine if it was true she was never convicted.. but then she gets done by those who were harassed/stalked by her in the aftermath

She gives herself too much credit. It's AH who is the most hated woman in the world, now followed by Markle. If she has never been convicted she has a case, the fact it was so easy to find her helps her case. She seems to have a lot of problems, but so does Richard Gadd for continuously going back for more, and encouraging her. These two need serious therapy.

That lady deserves an Oscar I was engrossed to her character ❤❤❤

"Doesn't give anyone the right to make her out to be a convicted self-admitted stalker" --- Gadd didn't say Martha is based on Fiona Harvey. Fiona was discovered by online "sleuths" and she then committed to outing herself and confirmed it was based on her. There's too much smoke to not be a fire here.

Actually buzzing for Andy watching him on Piers Morgan. Brilliant! Hope to you on there more Andy. You’re smashing it ! 🙌

I agree with you popcorn the reason why Martha gets away with what she gets away with because she’s so coddled

Also, I have a feeling that Netflix has all the evidence, including her being a convicted criminal, but are waiting for something to happen before releasing it. It’s taken over a month for others to come out and say she’s stalked them. In the long run, I don’t think Andy will be eating his hat! 😅

@AdBlu111

5 күн бұрын

Very unlikely Netflix would have any such information that others could have found in the month that has passed.

Good job Andy - so proud 🤓

Great ongoing discussion about BR and kudos to Piers for having you on the show with a nuanced view of what's going down with this person and Netflix - I'm waiting to see the actual facts

I am supposed to believe she is a lawyer? She is failing at 2nd grade spelling! On top of that, if she is as she states, she would not notify via social media her intentions regarding court. Mosy lawyers her age do not act as she does. She is way too immature. When the firm she works for blows then it'll get real serious, they probably don't know about it yet. Not good advertizing that your firm hired her.

@rwaneuin6259

12 күн бұрын

That's right. Lawyers should have way better language standards than the average people She can't even spell simple words. Her sentences have poor grammar, punctuation, construction and quality. More like primary school kids.

@babs66

12 күн бұрын

I think they're typing errors. Only the thick kids did typing at school.

@rwaneuin6259

11 күн бұрын

@@babs66 You mean lawyers can't type?

@lindamassie3708

5 күн бұрын

Perhaps she's a failed law student or maybe a never was law student. She couldn't seem To recall the grades she achieved when asked even though she said she has a photographic memory. We only have her word about being a lawyer. She doesn't seem to have been employed by many law firms if any.

The waiting music while you searched for the screenshot was too funny 😂 also I really appreciate that you didn’t bow down to the panel on piers’ show and held your own and stuck to your opinion! Long time watcher and it’s great to see how far the channel has come 🎉

If she’s been diagnosed with a psychotic condition then can she stand trial or court as she’s not of sound mind and body . They tend to incarcerate these people to secure hospitals . Often they can spend far more time in those hospitals than the crime would have warranted .

Couldn't hear the start.

@jillruben8924

12 күн бұрын

He’s freaking out. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Thought it was me as well.

Meghan ‘stalked’ Harry.. I reckon we should call her Martha Markle now..😂

UK is the same as Australia. Very strict laws around court cases

I think crazy is a word I would not have used!!

@rwaneuin6259

12 күн бұрын

Mentally unwell or mentally ill sounds worse to me.

I’ve been here since the Depp/Heard Trial but put a 2! ❤

Great job, Andy! 😃

I'm just relieved that vile Imarn Ayton wasn't invited back, but you were!

I will make you a hat from fondant/sugar paste, but I don’t think you will get to eat it. 😂🤣😂

Love this, Andy! You are a blast to watch!

That was a great line, well delivered, Andy! 😂

I was more interested in Richard Gadds story line in the show. That poor guy was going through so much anguish with his sexuality. He was so worried about hurting others while hurting himself. When he came clean to his parents and they were so loving. His Dad hugging him finally made me realize his Dad was relieved to tell his truth as well. I hope there is a second season with the family and Richard living his best life!

I’m a fan Andy but please PLEASE don’t let your ego get away from you.