Shah Bano Begum case, 1985 | Landmark Judgment | Law Guru

Shah Bano Begum case, was a controversial maintenance lawsuit in India, in which the Supreme Court delivered a judgment favouring maintenance given to an aggrieved divorced Muslim woman. very important case law in the field of law whether it is CLAT, LL.B Entrance, LL.M Entrance and Judiciary. So must watch.
Notes of the video
lawguruoffic...
PDF Notes of the video :- lawguruofficial.blogspot.com/...
Subscribe our KZread channel and get more knowledge of different laws on a single platform.
Law Guru
/ lawguruofficial
Like our Facebook page
/ lawguruofficial
Follow us on Instagram
/ lawguru_anuragrishi
Subscribe us on Telegram
t.me/lawguruofficial
Go to our Website (for more notes & Videos)
lawguruofficial.blogspot.com/
There are some more videos related to different topics, must watch
Legal Reasoning (Part 3)
• Legal Reasoning (Part ...
Legal Reasoning (Part 2)
• Legal Reasoning (Part ... ​
Legal Reasoning (part 1)
• Legal Reasoning (part ... ​​
National Commission for Women (NCW)
• National Commission fo... ​​​
State Human Rights Commission (SHRC)
• State Human Rights Com... ​​​​
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)
• National Human Rights ... ​​​​​
American Convention on Human Rights
• American Convention on... ​​​​​​
European Convention on Human Rights
• European Convention on... ​​​​​​​
Collective Rights | Third Generation of Rights
• Collective Rights | Th... ​​​​​​​​
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
• International Covenant... ​​​​​​​​​
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
• International Covenant... ​​​​​​​​​​
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
• Universal Declaration ... ​​​​​​​​​​​
Human Rights & United Nations
• Human Rights & United ... ​​​​​​​​​​​​
Introduction of Human Rights
• Introduction of Human ... ​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Cyber Crime Full Lecture
• Cyber Crime Full Lectu... ​​​​​​​​​...​

Пікірлер: 969

  • @fastacademy3195
    @fastacademy31952 жыл бұрын

    I salute to Shah Bano who was belonged to a conservative society at that time even she was not educated but she had raised the voice against injustice for the maintenance

  • @dr.arulshah5811

    @dr.arulshah5811

    2 жыл бұрын

    Don't try to make ISLAM is wrong!!! But here's really this shah bano, was good women till the end, & never married or had any other wrong relationships! So her ISLAMIC WORLD says that her husband must pay all her expenses & give equal rights in property, likewise the ARABS do, thanks.

  • @leospeaks3974

    @leospeaks3974

    2 жыл бұрын

    It seems like Allah favors higher caste Muslim men. He hates women and lower caste Muslim men. He loves perverts.

  • @fastacademy3195

    @fastacademy3195

    2 жыл бұрын

    Of course it's a peaceful religion, what's going on now a days in society , who is doing?

  • @fastacademy3195

    @fastacademy3195

    2 жыл бұрын

    If Islam is not peaceful religion then UAE, SAUDI ARAB INDONESHIYA, MALESHIYA TURKI these countries should involve in terriosim ,why they are peaceful

  • @leospeaks3974

    @leospeaks3974

    2 жыл бұрын

    Some countries just fund and support terrorism and look peaceful.

  • @raginimudaliar6925
    @raginimudaliar69252 жыл бұрын

    Very nicely explained. She needed money to maintain herself at 62.

  • @logicrulzz8791
    @logicrulzz87912 жыл бұрын

    Me being an Indian Muslim agree 100% Triple Talak was a non religious event made by Humans. Not by the religion itself.

  • @asnfhtmlzxsje274

    @asnfhtmlzxsje274

    2 жыл бұрын

    Ha ha ha and that is why it was furiously supported by muslim personal law board.

  • @freedomforever8168

    @freedomforever8168

    2 жыл бұрын

    totally agree, manmade laws can never withstand the common world laws on maintenance.

  • @Hello-db7yz

    @Hello-db7yz

    2 жыл бұрын

    Chutiye apna knowledge dene ki yaha kya jarurat thi ? Kisi ne pucha tuje ?

  • @noorsana4635

    @noorsana4635

    2 жыл бұрын

    Ali Thug It's not religious ofcourse it is a customary Muslim law but it's not followed properly. It's a long debate anyway.

  • @sanatanihindu3089

    @sanatanihindu3089

    2 жыл бұрын

    Made by maulanas

  • @jyotigirdhar9677
    @jyotigirdhar96772 жыл бұрын

    Shah Bano needed maintainans for herself not for her five children because in 1975 her children would be settled as they all were possibly in ages 30 to 40 years. So the speaker shouldn't be using this term. At the same time it was good and right verdict given

  • @ayazshakeeb

    @ayazshakeeb

    2 жыл бұрын

    ur point is also valid👍.

  • @satyajeethimwan8132

    @satyajeethimwan8132

    2 жыл бұрын

    You're right.

  • @mohammedyusuf3646

    @mohammedyusuf3646

    2 жыл бұрын

    Jyoti girdhar.. Kya Shah bano Ke bachhey APNI aged maan Ki dekhbal nahien kartey thhey Kya....???

  • @prisha88

    @prisha88

    Жыл бұрын

    @@mohammedyusuf3646 jb husband ne sath ni dia to bcho se umid ki ja skti h kya ?

  • @pacificviews2796
    @pacificviews27962 жыл бұрын

    Well explained in short. I wanted to know about this quite old case as this is taken in discussion at various forums of media.

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @dipakhalder5179
    @dipakhalder51792 жыл бұрын

    हर धार्मिक अंधता बेगुनाह लोगों के जिवन में समस्या लाता है चाहे कोई भी धरम हो।

  • @michealangelo1397
    @michealangelo13973 жыл бұрын

    Nicely and shortly managed to make understood the viewers....thanks

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    thank you so much for your appreciation.

  • @iqbalpatel3660
    @iqbalpatel36602 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for knowledge

  • @lisandeka4627
    @lisandeka46273 жыл бұрын

    Really nicely explained... Thank you to make these types of short and precise explanation of various laws and cases👍

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for your appreciation.

  • @DineshSharma-xm2vu

    @DineshSharma-xm2vu

    2 жыл бұрын

    Also thank you for understanding one liner god bless us all

  • @anandita369

    @anandita369

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@DineshSharma-xm2vu Kya Inse Achha ...bhi ? kzread.info/dash/bejne/fIaouMuHopXTdso.html

  • @Paperhooman
    @Paperhooman2 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for this video. It helped me in my civics assignment

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much.

  • @laybaafroz5782
    @laybaafroz57822 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for explaining this 🙏🙏🙏

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @Eliza7489
    @Eliza74892 жыл бұрын

    Excellent man! yu explained it so well.its my 1st video of yours which m watching nd i subscribed your channel within 10 scnds.

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for your appreciation and welcome to the family.

  • @manisidhu1149
    @manisidhu11493 жыл бұрын

    Thank you sir

  • @sdmolichannel8950
    @sdmolichannel89503 жыл бұрын

    It is so easy to understand sir .. thkank you so much sir ...

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    your welcome

  • @mohamedali-qv9ww
    @mohamedali-qv9ww Жыл бұрын

    Superb sir, explaining the entire background that is the correct way of teaching. U did that.. Thank u for the good lecture

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for your appreciation.

  • @ShwetaSingh-im6el
    @ShwetaSingh-im6el3 жыл бұрын

    Well explained... Thank you so much 😊

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for your appreciation.

  • @digital945

    @digital945

    2 жыл бұрын

    hi

  • @muzaffarmehdim.d.2471
    @muzaffarmehdim.d.24712 жыл бұрын

    Thanks, nicely explained, I appreciate & commend India's Supreme court for protecting divorced Muslim women's legal rights.

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @dnyaneshwarbharti5698

    @dnyaneshwarbharti5698

    2 жыл бұрын

    You should fight against islamik laws

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@dnyaneshwarbharti5698 But I am not an activist, I am an educator.

  • @mrinmoyr760
    @mrinmoyr7602 жыл бұрын

    Nicely explained in short. Thanks 👍

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @MyView965
    @MyView9653 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much sir. The explanation was very much understanding

  • @chintakgurjar8426

    @chintakgurjar8426

    2 жыл бұрын

    Get out from the cult of Islam. Watch Adam seeker and other ExMuslim KZread channels. Save yourself and save humanity.

  • @ashutosh7509kumar
    @ashutosh7509kumar Жыл бұрын

    ek number sir bahut acchi video banai hai sb smjh me aa gya

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @anshukumari1932
    @anshukumari19323 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much sir 🙏❤️❤️🙏

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    your welcome

  • @dishapiplad7546
    @dishapiplad75462 жыл бұрын

    Thank u sir....very well explained 👍✌️

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @AliMohammed-zw2gv
    @AliMohammed-zw2gv2 жыл бұрын

    there is no divorce if say three time, that is wrong still count one,thats why responsible,duty towards childre is stil there?

  • @surbhisingh7094
    @surbhisingh70943 жыл бұрын

    Well explained sir thank u 🙏

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    Our pleasure

  • @LawLecture
    @LawLecture4 жыл бұрын

    Awesome.... Bhut hi Ache se smjhaya h Apne sir ji👍

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    4 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for your appreciation

  • @beautybrightskin2303
    @beautybrightskin23032 жыл бұрын

    i Really appreciate indian judiciary for this commendable step....

  • @ambrishdixit3667
    @ambrishdixit36672 жыл бұрын

    Thank you very much for explaining this very properly

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @dr.shoaibahmad6170
    @dr.shoaibahmad61702 жыл бұрын

    Basic information of Shah Bano case👍

  • @myholythought6247
    @myholythought62473 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much Sir

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    your welcome

  • @mohanbhagat5287
    @mohanbhagat52872 жыл бұрын

    "हम दो-हमारे दो " के विज्ञापन ( advt) टीवी पर, थिएटर में फिरसे दिखाने चालू करें... 🙏🇮🇳

  • @freedom4mic
    @freedom4mic2 жыл бұрын

    Bahut acha explain kertay hain ap itni mushkil terms asaani say samjh a gayin hain.

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Shukriya.

  • @antimbalasen2287
    @antimbalasen22872 жыл бұрын

    बहुत रोचक और ज्ञानवर्धक जानकारी 🙏

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @navoditsahara5721
    @navoditsahara57212 жыл бұрын

    बहुत अच्छी तरह समझाया। धन्यवाद। अगर इस पर हुए राजनीतिक बवाल पर भी कुछ चर्चा करदेते तो और अच्छा रहता।

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Actually wo politics ka mudda hai, wo law ke student ke exams me ya fir unke course me nahi aega.

  • @PRINCEG1647U_GAMER
    @PRINCEG1647U_GAMER2 жыл бұрын

    Ur teaching is very good 👌👌

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    thank you so much

  • @VINODKUMARAUTO
    @VINODKUMARAUTO2 жыл бұрын

    Well explained, chhoti si video m sab kuchh samjha Diya thanks 🙏 sir

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome.

  • @indrakumar8529
    @indrakumar85292 жыл бұрын

    Excellent Explanation my dear friend.

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much

  • @poojasenjit9960
    @poojasenjit99602 жыл бұрын

    Thank you 🙏

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @becorrectandruleeveryone3154
    @becorrectandruleeveryone31543 жыл бұрын

    Awesome and very neet explanation

  • @ujjwalabaviskar6154
    @ujjwalabaviskar61542 жыл бұрын

    Very well explained .good job .👌🏻💙💙

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much

  • @rajeshvisani3597
    @rajeshvisani35973 жыл бұрын

    Yes. That's the nice style of presentation 👍

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for your appreciation.

  • @animalloverthekaithz1426
    @animalloverthekaithz14262 жыл бұрын

    Bro I watched your video only once and I became your Die hard fan. After all super explaination.

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for your support and appreciation.

  • @user-co6nl2id3m
    @user-co6nl2id3m2 жыл бұрын

    Married in 1932 having 5 children 3 sons more than 40 years old all children could not maintain their mother after divorce from father.

  • @deepshikhashikha1812
    @deepshikhashikha18122 жыл бұрын

    Amazing explanation..👍👍

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much

  • @kusumkapila
    @kusumkapila2 жыл бұрын

    I think you also need to explain what happened after, regarding the controversy.

  • @GamingMaster-ev2qk
    @GamingMaster-ev2qk Жыл бұрын

    explain in very simple. and i clear this case from your video. thnku sir

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    Жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @SunitaAggarwalStories
    @SunitaAggarwalStories2 жыл бұрын

    आपके बताने का तरीक़ा ख़ासा अच्छा है कि कानून जैसी पेचीदा बातें आसानी से समझ आ जाती है...

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for your appreciation.

  • @abdulrazzaksayyed6139
    @abdulrazzaksayyed61392 жыл бұрын

    Some of MUSLIMS didn't know what is Islam. First thing when you marry you have to give a good amount as meher.2nd things The divorce is not valid 3time one time. 3 difference time you have to choose according to quran suraha al bakhara.3 you can't ask meher back.4 .the person who's children with wife he have to give maintains every month. Above all Islam teaching humanity. The ex wife don't have any income the ex husband have to help with financially. In quran not written any were not take help from ex husband.

  • @abidabeguma4083

    @abidabeguma4083

    2 жыл бұрын

    Exactly

  • @ravindranathmishra8172

    @ravindranathmishra8172

    2 жыл бұрын

    No comment

  • @exxtraagyaanofficial10m36
    @exxtraagyaanofficial10m362 жыл бұрын

    not only wife, there were kids involved. so how dare he not pay?🙄

  • @harensurroch5281

    @harensurroch5281

    2 жыл бұрын

    men....

  • @AmanKumar-gq7li

    @AmanKumar-gq7li

    2 жыл бұрын

    Even the last child would be above the age of 30 and others were more than 30 or 35.

  • @atgwiuz

    @atgwiuz

    2 жыл бұрын

    Muslim

  • @DeshVarta.
    @DeshVarta.2 жыл бұрын

    Good explanation

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @mangomango6730
    @mangomango67302 жыл бұрын

    Excellent work.Maaloom hou raha hy k ap ka hard work shaamil hy.keep it up.

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much

  • @mangomango6730

    @mangomango6730

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@LawGuruOfficial wellcome

  • @jayantasen3567
    @jayantasen35672 жыл бұрын

    Very nicely and simply explained . Please let us know more about this brave lady . What happened next onwards and how is she now ? Her name should have been remembered respectfully all over the world at least on the Woman^s day . Please let us also know about the shameful role of our Prime Minister of that time . Thanks .

  • @irfanahmed73

    @irfanahmed73

    2 жыл бұрын

    That, judgement was overturned by an Act of Parliament. Later, Shah Bano, now dead, refused to take that money because of the controversy surrounding the case. Despite the Act, muslim men are now made to pay alimony if claimed. The difference in perception is because in muslim law, marriage is a contract.

  • @kushagraagrawal2548

    @kushagraagrawal2548

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@irfanahmed73 ya but it doesn't matter whether you are a hindu muslim christian or sikh Everybody will have to and should abide by the law and act accordingly

  • @irfanahmed73

    @irfanahmed73

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@kushagraagrawal2548 You have perhaps not heard about Shariat Application Act, 1937.

  • @kushagraagrawal2548

    @kushagraagrawal2548

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@irfanahmed73 somewhere I heard india is a secular country too As a citizen people themselves have some responsibilities and duties They should abide by the law which is made for everybody No single citizen in india is special Every citizen is same and every citizen is special The law should be same for everybody

  • @RajKumar-jg5qz

    @RajKumar-jg5qz

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@kushagraagrawal2548 Right 👍 bro

  • @leospeaks3974
    @leospeaks39742 жыл бұрын

    Small minds small hearts. It was a shameless act. Someone who served and cared for your for years you threw her out of home at such age. Such horrific

  • @zedg2323

    @zedg2323

    2 жыл бұрын

    Just like narendra modi

  • @leospeaks3974

    @leospeaks3974

    2 жыл бұрын

    Narendra Modi and his lady were victim of child marriage. His wife never claimed in court nor was slaved like Shah Bano. She instead stood on her feet.

  • @zedg2323

    @zedg2323

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@leospeaks3974 You can write as much as u want sir Truth never changes

  • @indianbyheart2075

    @indianbyheart2075

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@zedg2323 modi Apani biwi ke sath rahe hi nahi Kabhi To aage ki baat banati nahi Tum katwo ki nafrat samaz sakta hu. Lekin haqiqat ye hai ki Tum logo ko nafrat ke sath hi jeena padega abb hindustan me

  • @mad_in_2020

    @mad_in_2020

    2 жыл бұрын

    Leo this is the reality.

  • @raghunathreddy6661
    @raghunathreddy66612 жыл бұрын

    Good explanation sir.

  • @preetgollu8458
    @preetgollu84583 жыл бұрын

    Excellence explanation........

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @priyanknanavati496

    @priyanknanavati496

    2 жыл бұрын

    Hii beautiful

  • @amitakumar1708
    @amitakumar17082 жыл бұрын

    किसी की दूसरी बीवी बनने से पहले हर स्त्री को याद रखना चाहिए कि उसे भी ज्यादा उम्र के बाद पति उसे छोड़ कर किसी और को फिर से पत्नी बना लेगा।

  • @raghunathreddy6661

    @raghunathreddy6661

    2 жыл бұрын

    For muslims only.

  • @sonakhan4091

    @sonakhan4091

    2 жыл бұрын

    Right

  • @ashrafulmakhlukat418

    @ashrafulmakhlukat418

    2 жыл бұрын

    Are kam akal ladki kya admi budha nahi hoga kya

  • @nabihasan58

    @nabihasan58

    2 жыл бұрын

    Jo muslim ladki aisay baat bole ya to mabaab islam nahin parhaya ya english parhkar western ban rahi hai saadi kya hai inkay liye

  • @kasshu.azhar.adv12

    @kasshu.azhar.adv12

    2 жыл бұрын

    And few people can leave their wives to become prime minister...

  • @zindagigulzar8509
    @zindagigulzar85092 жыл бұрын

    Patni divorce ke baad legal nahi thi bachhe to legali issi ke the...fir maintenance kyu nahi dena chahiye?????

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    bilkul

  • @jufsrdaghyijfrazdsfujngfgo2153
    @jufsrdaghyijfrazdsfujngfgo21533 жыл бұрын

    सन 1978 मैं 25, 200, 179.80 & 500 रुपए मतलब आज के कितने रुपए हुए?? यह देखने के लिए कौन सा फार्मूला इस्तेमाल करना चाहिए?? 1978 में रुपए 25 मतलब आज के 2,148 रुपए!! और 179.80 रुपए मतलब आज के हिसाब से 15,448 रुपए के बराबर थे!!

  • @jaglanempire9031

    @jaglanempire9031

    3 жыл бұрын

    Watch the concept of time value of money, in the business Lecture, it's a topic of account subject

  • @ManpreetKaur-zt3sq
    @ManpreetKaur-zt3sq3 жыл бұрын

    It's incredible explanation 👌👌👌❣️❣️

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    thank you

  • @vswarup
    @vswarup Жыл бұрын

    Mr Rajiv Gandhi's action permanantly alienated me from congress

  • @nidhitanwar3573
    @nidhitanwar35733 жыл бұрын

    Nice explaination 👍

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    thank you

  • @mohanbhagat5287
    @mohanbhagat52872 жыл бұрын

    #समान_नागरिकता_कानून कितना आवश्यक है, देखो मेरे हिंदुस्तानी भाईयों!!!! 🙏🇮🇳🚩

  • @shaarminakhter1538

    @shaarminakhter1538

    2 жыл бұрын

    WTF?

  • @Smartlawstudy
    @Smartlawstudy2 жыл бұрын

    Very beautifully expalined

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much

  • @jasssingh5706
    @jasssingh57062 жыл бұрын

    thanks for indormation

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @jitendrapatil3276
    @jitendrapatil32762 жыл бұрын

    Nice explanation. But i was expecting Rajiv Gandhi role in your video.

  • @radconsultants6767
    @radconsultants67672 жыл бұрын

    My big Salute to Shah Banu, a brave Lady of an Indian Muslim who dares to oppose Triple Talak. Once again my big salute to that brave lady.

  • @amitakumar1708

    @amitakumar1708

    2 жыл бұрын

    Brave lady का दर्द का कारण भी उसका पति ही है, जिसे सिर्फ देह से प्यार था, न कि शाह बानो से, स्त्री कब समझेगी कि पुरुष को सिर्फ देह से मतलब है, न कि स्त्री मन से । पुरुष के लिए स्त्री सिर्फ देह है न कि इंसान

  • @jane-ew2jh

    @jane-ew2jh

    2 жыл бұрын

    Tripple talaq not there in quran pls girl gets dowry before hand flat car money plus maintainance so no alimony tats y divorce made easy

  • @yasminfer9392

    @yasminfer9392

    2 жыл бұрын

    You need to know how talaq given in islamic religion because people are not aware of it.

  • @immafav2353

    @immafav2353

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jane-ew2jh try to fix halala first, dowry is illegal in India and punishable by law

  • @mrityunjaytiwari6224

    @mrityunjaytiwari6224

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jane-ew2jh well fgm is not in india.?........

  • @sargamsingh8775
    @sargamsingh87753 жыл бұрын

    Thank u so much

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    your welcome

  • @dhanashreeabdar3817
    @dhanashreeabdar3817 Жыл бұрын

    very nicely explained..

  • @youtubtroll337
    @youtubtroll3372 жыл бұрын

    She is a Lion.... real Lion God bless her soul.

  • @yagyabasnet4712
    @yagyabasnet47122 жыл бұрын

    Beautiful though India shortages to have a uniform civil code.

  • @DeepakSingh-sf9jw
    @DeepakSingh-sf9jw2 жыл бұрын

    Excellent 🙏🙏🙏

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @ghanshyamtiwari0076
    @ghanshyamtiwari0076 Жыл бұрын

    bahut acche se samjhaya apne thankyou 👍

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    Жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @pushpapatil2319
    @pushpapatil23192 жыл бұрын

    You explained very well sir 🙏🙂 Please you make all land mark cases video of all subjects it's very much helps to law students 🙏🙂 💖 ly Dhanyavad 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    thank you so much for your appreciation.

  • @annu2292

    @annu2292

    2 жыл бұрын

    Tumhi kutun?

  • @luminous6810
    @luminous68102 жыл бұрын

    I heard a lot about shah banu now I know about the history of her .

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    You will not get that much details in any other videos.

  • @IloveonlyHairyCat
    @IloveonlyHairyCat Жыл бұрын

    Thankyou sir for very clear and perfectly explained .I reached her just to do my assignment on Any gender based violence 🤣🤌👍so in return I will keep supporting ur channel 👍♥️♥️

  • @pallavipriyadarsini4389
    @pallavipriyadarsini43892 жыл бұрын

    Subscribed wow so dtailed and easy language explained

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much

  • @abidansari9041
    @abidansari90412 жыл бұрын

    Very good explain shahbano case.

  • @smith00793
    @smith007932 жыл бұрын

    Sir this is a case of 1985 and you're saying Supreme court held this judgement in 1981. How's that possible?

  • @surjeetchauhan1
    @surjeetchauhan12 жыл бұрын

    Our law is shameful thing Jisme kisiko b insaaf nahi milta

  • @ramachandranayak7300
    @ramachandranayak73003 жыл бұрын

    Best your teaching

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    your welcome.

  • @hasinanagmakhatoon6960
    @hasinanagmakhatoon69602 жыл бұрын

    Bahut khub.. Be continue 🙏🎯🌹

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @hazratmohammadsabkeliye
    @hazratmohammadsabkeliye3 жыл бұрын

    अपना और दूसरों का वक़्त बचाने के लिए शुक्रिया

  • @nadeembutt4307
    @nadeembutt43072 жыл бұрын

    As per Islamic law a husband is bound to support his wife after divorce , if she does not get married again, and as far as children are concerned it is his responsibility to support them in any case.

  • @abm1188

    @abm1188

    2 жыл бұрын

    Plz refer the source again brother, husband is liable to support only upto Iddat period, once iddat is over both will b separated and husband will not pay any amount to the wife. As far as children are concerned, it's duty of father to do all expenses, mother is not responsible to spend on them.

  • @suju2112

    @suju2112

    2 жыл бұрын

    .

  • @atgwiuz

    @atgwiuz

    2 жыл бұрын

    Trying to portray filthy desert cult as good, not gonna work here

  • @sunitadwivedi8042
    @sunitadwivedi80422 жыл бұрын

    Very nicely explained

  • @utkarshsingh_rajput
    @utkarshsingh_rajput Жыл бұрын

    Tq for this good explanation

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    Жыл бұрын

    Your welcome

  • @yunushmahammad3787
    @yunushmahammad37872 жыл бұрын

    Nice information 👍👍

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @ikhyati
    @ikhyati3 жыл бұрын

    👌👌👌

  • @miadodson1938
    @miadodson1938 Жыл бұрын

    Great video, really enjoyed it, it is very well laid out with good English translation for non Hindi speaking audience ...I will be following your channel - Divorce is pronounced as De-vorce, not Die vorce

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for your appreciation, and thank you so much for your advice.

  • @sahsamar6420
    @sahsamar64202 жыл бұрын

    Even the last child would be above the age of 30 and others were more than 30 or 35. How can a person will be allowed to be given maintenance charges for children. Maintenance must be allowed for wife only.

  • @lemlematta229

    @lemlematta229

    2 жыл бұрын

    Her children will use the money for their wedding 🙏❤️ Good for you my lady

  • @tittoantonyadam6276

    @tittoantonyadam6276

    2 жыл бұрын

    True

  • @ks3394
    @ks33943 жыл бұрын

    Wow that was so unbiased n clear

  • @mamtadhiman5437
    @mamtadhiman54372 жыл бұрын

    Nicely explanation

  • @sangeetasundar33
    @sangeetasundar332 жыл бұрын

    In this case one congressi leader told let them be in gutter

  • @chintakgurjar8426
    @chintakgurjar84262 жыл бұрын

    Nullification of tripal talak law was necessary. Govt did the correct step. Now time to abolish polygamy

  • @nisacreation

    @nisacreation

    2 жыл бұрын

    Can you please tell me how to ban polygamy ?

  • @ssal9276

    @ssal9276

    2 жыл бұрын

    Polygamy isn't a problem, triple talak was and now it is gone

  • @chintakgurjar8426

    @chintakgurjar8426

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@nisacreation law can be made for it.

  • @chintakgurjar8426

    @chintakgurjar8426

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@ssal9276 polygamy is immoral in 21st century. Look at the male female ratio in India.

  • @nisacreation

    @nisacreation

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@chintakgurjar8426 its not easy no one going to help

  • @ranibhatia748
    @ranibhatia7482 жыл бұрын

    Aise husbands koi kasar nahi chhodte wife aur baccho ki zindagi barbaad karne mein. Aur aise cases bahut normal hai desh mein. Thank God supreme court ne maintenance ya alimony ko leke aacha judgement diya. Ab saari wives ko kuch to protection mil gyi. Thanks our supreme court 👏❤️

  • @Vkhawani

    @Vkhawani

    2 жыл бұрын

    Supreme Court ne to judgement de diya wife ke paksh mein, par uske baad jo politicians aur doosre logon ne, jinko ki is judgement se takleef ho rahi thi - jo Shahbano ke aur unke jaisi women ke khilaf kiya, wo bhi pata karna zaroori hai.

  • @imranshahzad1613
    @imranshahzad16132 жыл бұрын

    Excellent explain.

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @zameerqureshi6817
    @zameerqureshi68172 жыл бұрын

    Excellent explanation....

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @asloobhindustani8667
    @asloobhindustani86672 жыл бұрын

    Justice Y B Chandrachur had referred one verse of Quran و للمطلقات متاع با لمعروف حق علی المتقین This line is in para 2 of Quran، acceptable to all muslims

  • @simplifylearn..
    @simplifylearn..3 жыл бұрын

    Nice explanation sir....🙂🙂

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    thank you for your appreciation

  • @simplifylearn..

    @simplifylearn..

    3 жыл бұрын

    Keep it up sir✌✌😊

  • @roshaniraginisaha47
    @roshaniraginisaha473 жыл бұрын

    Very impactful video sir

  • @LawGuruOfficial

    @LawGuruOfficial

    3 жыл бұрын

    thank you so much

  • @salehafaisal8793
    @salehafaisal87932 жыл бұрын

    No if a man gives divorce to his wife in Islam then he has to pay a specific amount In terms of maintenance Muhammad Ahmad Khan was exploiting the oslam law and jurisdiction

  • @sweetykankani
    @sweetykankani3 жыл бұрын

    ❤️🙏❤️🙏

Келесі