The reason why the Sejong's price is low because Korea has the world's No. 1 shipbuilding industry for a long time, has excellent infrastructure, has a lot of experience in building ships, and has jointly purchased Aegis System, which accounts for most of the total price, with Japan at a discount. And three additional ships have already been built, and six new destroyers that localize everything from radar and propulsion systems will be built from next year

@RyzenRTX89

5 ай бұрын

Love and respect for South Korea form India🙏🏾

@kennethferland5579

3 ай бұрын

The US should buy these ships (or a modified version of them), doing for Cruisers what it did with the Frem Frigates from Italy. Our allies have better surface warship designs and the production capacity to make them rapidly and afordably which our own industry lacks due to the collase of the US shipbuilding industry. Their is neither the time nor money to try to revive that industry and the navy is serious about replacing the fleet it needs to tell congress to drop it's insistence on domestic production.

regarding Sejong, Long story short, something about the design's specifications have always seemed off to me, and finding the original Flight III Burke study cemented those doubts. The 128-cell Burke study ballparked the design's standard displacement at 8957 tons. That concept was 550ft long overall, which is 5.5ft more than KDX-III, and the flush deck definitely adds to its volume (and thus displacement), but it's also 10.25ft narrower than KDX-III. Given the ship should be larger than the 128-cell Burke (the wider hull will mean more deck area and hull volume), Sejong the Great should not be some 1307 tons lighter than the former if all else about the designs were the same. Which, of course, leads to the conclusion that all else between KDX-III and the 128-cell Burke is not the same. KDX-III uses the same radar, propulsion plant, most of the same weapons (Sejong has more), and has the same aviation facilities as the 128-cell Burke, so those are mostly out. Technological advances from 1989 to the late 2000s would cause savings in weight for these systems, yes, but with these key items all being the same or better on Sejong that the Burke study, it’s likely this was leveraged to make the former more capable rather than lighter. The displacement gap is not likely down to consumables (fuel, food, ammo, etc.) capacity either, as comparing the loaded displacements yields a fairly similar 1293 ton difference. The Korean ship does have a much lower complement of 300 vs. 363 (the study says 393, but that includes a growth margin), but I've never known accommodations 63 people to cost that much additional weight. If anything, trends of automation tend to show the opposite: a higher level of automation adds weight but saves space, while more crew requires greater space but reduces weight (at least until the larger crew necessitates additional shared facilities like bathrooms and mess halls). All that process of elimination really leaves only one candidate the Koreans are possibly cutting corners on: survivability. Redundant systems, watertight bulkheads, systems separation, shock isolation measures, and deliberately-inefficient system design to minimize single points of failure (among other measures) all add weight. Applied across the length of a 510ft ship, that becomes a lot of extra weight compared to civilian construction standards. Still, quantifying how much worse 1300 tons’ less of subdivision is for Sejong the Great's survivability is can't be done without a detailed set of blueprints. TL;DR The Koreans are likely skimping on survivability, which is why they can shove so many weapons on KDX-III for relatively low displacement. Building a Sejong the Great equivalent ship to USN standards would result in a large, 4-figure displacement increase over Arleigh Burke, likely to about 12000-13000 tons loaded.

@Kenny-yl9pc

2 жыл бұрын

Your reasoning makes sense and sounds right to me and if you consider the low price tag it may relates to your assessment of corner cutting in regards to survivability and such..

@juoh3285

Жыл бұрын

Sejong the great is larger 11,000 tons its almost the size of a cruiser

@zebraman1437

11 ай бұрын

@@juoh3285 7,650 tons standard displacement. 10,600 tons full load. It is not as big as you think

@donfully

5 ай бұрын

this makes even more sense once you consider sejong flight ii displacement is even greater but with less cells. I think they realize having more cells don't justify cutting those corners

Thanks for video about my country's ship Ship-launched variant of Hyunmoo-3 missile is called Haesung(which means sea-star)-2. Also ROK Navy has AW159 ASW helicopters too. Though they are for frigates, Sejong class can still operate them when it is needed Since Sejong class are KDX-3 Batch-1, KDX-3 Batch-2 will soon be developed, and I expected that they will be one of the best Aegis destroyer in the world

@jacobbaumgardner3406

2 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't be surprised if they field the Spy-6 baseline 10 used on the new Arliegh Burke Flight III. Looking forward to it.

@xavierng1951

2 жыл бұрын

I have a feeling another size increase will happen to accommodate more localized content like the K-VLS, which is actually larger than the Mk.41, cell to cell. The US Navy may want to rope in the Koreans for their Ticonderoga Cruiser replacement program. They could conceivably provide the information needed to finally see a new class built and the Ticos to finally retire.

For those that think that Koreans are no good at building warships on my opinion they are a better and reliable than the Chinese. Korean Hyundai heavy industry made the two Multi mission frigates a Jose Rizal Class Frigates of the Philippines. It is such a good Warships that even Chinese don't dare anymore to come near to the EEZ of the Philippines after the arrival of two frigates that is named BRO Jose Rizal and BRP Antonio Luna. Hyundai of South Korea are also building the two new Corvettes for the PHILIPPINES that is heavier longer and bigger than the frigates. What I like about Koreans is they always know what is their costumer wants the Koreans able to adjust depends what their costumer needs. Just because it's Asia doesn't mean it's not made with quality. PHILIPPINES is buying warship in Korea the thing is Korean Warships are cheap yet very reliable..

@andrewzheng4038

2 жыл бұрын

Korea building warships shouldn’t really be a surprise to anyone - before China’s reforms and opening Japanese and Korean commercial shipyards were some of the most productive in the world. Kitbashing some NATO standard weapons onto a hull isn’t that technically difficult

@reneabrea4123

2 жыл бұрын

Huwag kang mag yabang..putragiz pilipino ka..

@kevinalcanzado974

2 жыл бұрын

Hyundai indeed is the biggest shipbuilding company in this hemisphere, good propolio of warships will able the customer to pick which is the best for them, best regards from philippines

@luhutpenganutsaksijehovah1947

2 жыл бұрын

Bullsh1it, they made a broken unlicensed submarines, even cant repair it as product guarantee

@user-kc1tf7zm3b

2 жыл бұрын

What total bullshit, Luna. The Chinese Navy can always brush aside the Filipino Navy without breaking a sweat. The Chinese have motivation, focus and money to achieve their strategic goals. The Philippines have paid a heavy price ever since they demanded the Americans leave their military bases 30 years ago in 1992. The Philippines only have themselves to blame for the predicament they find themselves in.

To Be Honest, this ship is so good looking, not only that it looks sleek but its also sexy👌♥️

@Andy-zs7bw

2 жыл бұрын

You have a poor taste

@turcenoarthurjamil4364

2 жыл бұрын

@UC7p0Byij0IdKsLaNARogK-A and so do you

This ship is literally at least 3 times as potent as a British type 45 while costing less. It really shows the ripoff of the British tax payer and betrayal of British defence needs. This has 128 vlc, a type 45 has 48. This has a towed sonar and the type 45 being an air defence destroyer as we're told has none. With over twice the vlc air defence and cruise missile capacity and anti submarine sonar and rockets it is at least 3 times as potent.

@abcdefgh-hz6pk

2 жыл бұрын

Why ppl compare directly ships strength with amount of vls , in real case scenario this ship will be beast if is able to launch third of its vls before being sunk

@sadasasdas8467

Жыл бұрын

@@abcdefgh-hz6pk cry more🤣🤣🤣🤣

brooo this ship is in my fav game modern warship

@hymenbreaker6100

2 жыл бұрын

tier 2 ship lmao🤣

@luxtergaming9789

2 жыл бұрын

Also mine⚡️

@awangkumohamaddanishakhtar8437

2 жыл бұрын

Same bro

@Kuromorimine

2 жыл бұрын

Modern warships game pro 500000%

@maclarens532

2 жыл бұрын

@@hymenbreaker6100 SHUT UP

Will these ships carry essm? Plus will they carry the abm version of the standard missile like the more recent burkes do?

Burke class destroyer definitely inspires a number of navy to build their own aegis Destroyer!

@schandler4530

2 жыл бұрын

you called this inspire? It's just a re-use of existing technology

It would be amazing for the US to repeal the Jones Act and purchase 30-50 of these ships. That would get the price even lower, and likely spurs South Korea into purchasing more of them as well, which boosts the US' overall efforts in the Pacific and East Asia in particular.

Canada, AUS and UK should have bought a bunch of these.

@kookie175

Жыл бұрын

They can't. because they'll won't be able to rip their country men's tax payers money.

If you wonder how the hell South Korea built this warship that is no less sophisticated than the latest Arleigh Burke-class destroyers yet more heavily armed and bigger in size and yet... cost less than $1 billion, and they only built 3, as we know for so long that weapons program becomes more expensive if economy of scale not put into use. And now the question is how the hell latest Arleigh Burke-class destroyers cost $1,85 billion per ship to make...? The answer would be $1,35 billion of it alone is pure profit for defense companies and the rest is the real cost to build it.

@dwwolf4636

2 жыл бұрын

US requirements that parts manuf./construction happens in as many states as possible to spread the gravy. Plus an in-efficient US procurement system. And SK baseline salaries are lower.

@dwchen1

2 жыл бұрын

@@dwwolf4636 like Donald Trump said to Boeing about the ridiculously overpriced new Air Force One program : "We want Boeing to make money, but to that much money". It is showing the legendary inefficiency of US military industrial complex where defense companies had so much lobbying power for so long to keep military hardware procurement overpriced.

@anguswaterhouse9255

2 жыл бұрын

He says it in the video dude 1:36

@anguswaterhouse9255

2 жыл бұрын

He says it in the video dude 1:36

@tubarlog

2 жыл бұрын

Korea has the biggest, most efficient and cost effective civil ship building industry in the world, which enables them to make ships in general cheaper. Korean workes get paid less dollars then American. And as the video said, they only used full developed technologies, which the borrowed from other countries. Zero experiments.

Great missile shields for US vessels against Chinese missiles!

@BeeOppresion

2 жыл бұрын

Mak kau hijau

@lucisleesion8824

2 жыл бұрын

day dreaming

Can it support the impact of an oil carrier (as the arleigh Burk!, "accident" tested), aerligh Burk was in the size of those ships that survived nuclear attack test by the US Navy

Could you also do a vid about the brand new JS Maya class destroyers from Japan?

@aroopgohainbaruah5216

2 жыл бұрын

Maya class is my fav

@MESSI-10000

2 жыл бұрын

The *Maya* of Japan have Mexican names 😭

I like this video because its interestyng

It'd be unsurprising that Sejong's increased weight was fueled by the desire to surpass the weights of Japan's Kongou & Atago classes which were in service that time...

@jacobbaumgardner3406

2 жыл бұрын

Your thinking is on the right track, but for a different reason. The greater size is required for the rolls Royce generators, which give it greater efficiency, but also takes up a lot of space.

@noirbeck

8 ай бұрын

That's your error. Since Korea is in an environment where it cannot build as many destroyers as China or Japan, it must equip each destroyer with as much armament as possible. This is the reason why we are trying to build the Arsenal ship.

It's been a while since I watch this much good content in military category. Good Job!

WOW. NICE VESSEL.

Your videos are very good, but if you put them in Turkish subtitles, it could be much better.

This ship is my dream ship in modern warships

@Andy-zs7bw

2 жыл бұрын

Because you love k drama?

@arnelplayz

2 жыл бұрын

@@Andy-zs7bw no i don't watch k dramas in Modern Warships Sejong the Great is a monster in tier 2 with 2 missle launcher with torpedoes no kidding itz a monsters and it had 20% more gold and cash for each fight Sejong the Great is too powerful but it cost 4,500 that's why i am saving gold to buy this ship.

@eagol

2 жыл бұрын

you must be a happy guy as your expectations could be easily fulfilled.

@arnelplayz

2 жыл бұрын

@@eagol thanks

@Balaji_G

Жыл бұрын

Its a really good ship but you will be dead before you even know in order to not to die its should be played defensively... But its a really good ship

Looks like an Arleigh Burke class

@romell06

2 жыл бұрын

Because its designed is based on arleigh burke its using Aegis combat system

Try to make video on type 058 Chinese zumwalt

@fqeagles21

2 жыл бұрын

It Doesn’t exist for now

remember, this ship was made cheaper due to thea fact that the shipbuilder in korea applied new technique to build the ship in a more efficient make. South Korea is the best ship maker in the world

@user-ss7qs4ps1i

2 жыл бұрын

South Korea is no where near China in terms of ship buildings efficiency

@user-zc7rb8eb6n

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ss7qs4ps1i sorry but in terms of quality, china is nowhere near to South Korea. Don’t you know why South Korea recaptured world’s largest shipmaking country surpassing china? It’s becasue of quality. China’s ship is cheap, but builted so poorly that so many minor errors happen

@user-ss7qs4ps1i

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-zc7rb8eb6n 人要会认清现实，韩国这种小国要怎么跟江山万里的中国比较。还有，你这个战舰的科技都是来自80 年代前的，韩国根本就没有自己建筑战舰的技术。下次张口是注意点知道不，吧证据拿出来，中国制造的工业船只至如今都没发生过意外。

@user-ss7qs4ps1i

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-zc7rb8eb6n While ships made in China had never suffered from problems, a "made in Korea" ferry Sewol sank because of poor weather killing 299 people. In China, no ships have sank just because of a simple bad weather, and you here claiming south korea having better ship building quality is just hilarious. China currently leads in ship building quality, technology, speed, quality and tonnage. What does south korea lead in?

@michaellim4165

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ss7qs4ps1i LNG

Sejong the Great class destroyer Is not a destroyer it’s a cruiser. Destroyer types in certain countries like USA, Korea, China and to a point Japan are cruises not destroyers. Its becoming a problem where it’s losing it intended purpose of being a screening ships for capital ships and turning into something else. The littoral ships didn’t turn out well. They were a cross between corvette and frigate why don’t navies learn. Same for frigates navies are getting confused on intended purpose of the difference between frigate and destroyer. Destroyers are a screening ship and frigates are a anti sub multi purpose vessel.

Wich one better? This one or Js Ashigara?

I recomend we must have 3 units of this sophsticated warship for external defense. Protection of small warship

Make a video about Vishakapatnam class destroyers 🇮🇳

@rohitb5834

2 жыл бұрын

this channel does not cover Indian equipement , no matter how good they are or how awesome supersonic missiles they carry. dont waste your time, leave a dislike and move on.

좋은영상 올려주셔서 감사합니다. 모든 분들에게 행운이.....

@daveyponderosa9549

2 жыл бұрын

👍👍

This is the best battle ship in the world.

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

Has an inferior radar to Type-055, inferior anti-ship missiles and is less stealthy (not really relevant).

@a15bionic59

Жыл бұрын

@@definitelyfrank9341type 55 radar isnt proven, even so the type 55 can only have 112 max missiles and sejong has 128. Chinese ashm are equally as easy to intercept than korean ones.

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

@@a15bionic59 Type-055's radar has been used on Type-052C and Type-052D since 2002, what do you mean it isn't 'proven'? There's a big difference in anti-ship capabilities, dude. Korea's SSM-700K C-Star has a range of only 180+ km and only travels at subsonic speeds. China's Yj-18 has a range of 220-540 km (range depends on missile trajectory), and cruises at subsonic speed but speeds up to mach 2.5-mach 3.0 in the terminal phase.

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

@@a15bionic59 The radar of Type-055 is just a Type-052C/D's radar but improved.

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

@@a15bionic59 Mark 41 VLS is also substantially smaller than the Chinese GJB 5860-2006 VLS.

Make video on vishakhapattanam class destroyer 🇮🇳India's biggest stealth destroyer

Proved $925M cruiser or Ahead of its time $1B+ Frigate? Which one is better?

This is the possible future destroyer warship in the Philippines in horizon 3, now we have 2 new frigate, 2 new corvette and in Horizon 3, we need at least 2 new destroyer Sejong type destroyer warship.

@Andy-zs7bw

2 жыл бұрын

You better hope that's not gonna happen

@lilsai1713

2 жыл бұрын

Philippines can't afford destroyers, better to have fleets of frigates instead

세종대왕함이 최고의 이지스함인데, 생긴게, 쌈 잘하게 생겼잖아... The comments were erased by Google kids.

Hey make a video on INS Visakhapatnam please.

@_SaptakDatta__Sci

2 жыл бұрын

@Austin Carr oh really? Then explain me how it is " too under armed" mr. know all?

@rohitb5834

2 жыл бұрын

this channel does not cover Indian equipments, so usually i come over , leave a dislike and go on. lol Never the less, Vishakapatnam is hell of a beast, probably among the Top 5 in the world.

@marcb551

2 жыл бұрын

@@_SaptakDatta__Sci INS Vishakapatnam is definitely a really powerful warship, especially with the powerful MFSTAR radar and BrahMos. And please ignore that batsoup. They get triggered when they havnt spread any new diseases for a while. Greetings from USA

@abcdefgh-hz6pk

Жыл бұрын

@@marcb551 vishakha only purpose is anti ship and it exels in that plus considering brahmos er has already been tasted ( 700 to 800 km range )

It is a must have warship for the Philippine Navy,,Philippine Defense Department must acquire this kind of warship, it would be a great addition to the defense capability of the Philippine Navy.

@RyzenRTX89

5 ай бұрын

Love and respect for Philippines and South Korea from India🙏🏾

You missed the 4x4 box launchers

@GoldMind_Clod

2 жыл бұрын

Lol hahaha modern warship

Railgun battleships powered by fusion reactors are the future

@joedirt861

Жыл бұрын

Maybe. Reactor powered ships incorporate many safety measures that don't mesh with a combat gunship designed to take punishment. This is why a nuclear powered Iowa is a silly idea.

Bet ko to for Philippines

lol the strongest is not type 055 as it’s classified as a cruiser instead of a destroyer😂

I hope by 2032, Philippine navy has 3 units of this kind of destroyer. 8 improve daegu type class frigate and 10- 12 HDC 3200 Corvette. THE JOSE RIZAL CLASS BE DOWNGRADED AND RE- CLASSIFY AS CORVETE TO COMPLIMENT TO THE HDC 3200 CORVETTE. THE PN SHOULD ORDER LIKE DAEGU CLASS FRIGATE BUT BE IMPROVE TO 4,000 TONS.

@Andy-zs7bw

2 жыл бұрын

So you want your navy to put too much eggs in 1 basket

@justinviper7149

2 жыл бұрын

Missiles brahmos is final deterent against enemys warships OFCOURSe the submarines procure still ongoing it depend on budget. MRF is not practical of course we need that but very expensive 50 MRF is just enough because the true deterent interceptor is surface to air missiles like Spyder, David sling, Akash and for anti -ballistic David sling and arrow 2 the Philippine military slowly procure this type of interceptor: ten battery of Spyder, ten battery of Akash or KM-SAM, 5 BATTERY OF DAVID SLING, 5 BATTERY OF ARROW FOR ANTI BALLISTIC MISSILE BUT THE OFFENSIVE WEAPONS IS 10-15 BATTERIES OF BRAHMOS. 3-5 SQUADRON OF MRF IS JUST ENOUGH BECAUSE WE CANNOT MATCH THE NUMBER OF MRF OF ENEMYS AIRCRAFT BUT IN DEFENSIVE PURPOSE WE INVEST IN SURFACE TO AIR MISSILE INCLUDING WARSHIPS IT SHOULD BE 16-32 SURFACE TO AIR MISSILE.

@justinviper7149

2 жыл бұрын

@@Andy-zs7bw 4-6 submarines for Philippines is enough but we need more anti submarine helicopters.

@Andy-zs7bw

2 жыл бұрын

@@justinviper7149 Sejong destroyers means putting almost of your eggs in 1 basket

@justinviper7149

2 жыл бұрын

@@Andy-zs7bw sejong is cheap compare to contemporary, I mean it's affordable 47 bilyon pesos for 1 destroyer compare to USA worth 1-2 billion USD for 1 unit. OFCOURSe Phil. navy is acquiring more of hdc 3100 corvettes. I know the Phil. govt cannot afford for destroyer as of this moment limited budget but in the future if economy will encrease destroyer is possible. Destroyer is complete package of air defense and cruise missile, her weapons and missiles equivalent to 3 frigates. That is why I said just 3 destroyer but corvettes & frigates are continue purchasing.

That is a lot of missiles. It could be argued to be an eggs in one basket situation.

Bro i live on Kauai!!

They need to build a cruiser.

Dear Sir and Madame. I am a germ ret navy officer. I know many poor Men from Thailand, that would love to work in your lovly country ! If anybody knows an employer or a job please please let me know. I can garanty their integrity. Thank you very much

Dapat may isang distro yer lang sa Pilipinas

055 says hi😉

What 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳in MODERNWARSHIP there is also what the hell bro 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳🗿🙏🏽

If $923million convert to Philippine peso is cost 47.8 billion pesos per unit

Type 055 said hi

Is the goalkeeper a human?😁

Daftar kapal perusak terbaik di Asia Sejong the great class (Korea) 055/renhai class (China) Maya class (Jepang) 052D class/luyang lll class (China) Kolkata class (India) Atago class (Jepang) Lanjutkan 👇

@aroopgohainbaruah5216

2 жыл бұрын

Vishakapatnam Class (India). The three Sejong Class, Type 55 and Maya Class are the best.

@rohitb5834

2 жыл бұрын

Vishakapatnam Class is in the house too noww , slightly better than Kolkata Class.

@yrkim3018

2 жыл бұрын

Jeongjo the great class from Korea is just launched with even bulkier and bigger than Sejong. it is more than 12,000t full load

Where is maya class destroyer ?

Indonesia can buy this, rokn allow indo buy this destroyer

Seria un destructor y una mejor opción para Perú el almirante Miguel Grau.🇵🇪

Our deepest respect to both South Korea, and North Korea. Hoping for peace and prosperity for both.

it just looks like a copy of an alreigh burke class

If the South Korean Navy and the Japanese Navy fight, Japan will lose because Japan will have higher performance and occupancy and the number of ships held by Japan is more overwhelming.

@Poppop-ut3gh

Жыл бұрын

Wow, Japan navy must be dumb as hell! losing with all that advantages 😮

Basically its a Korean version of a Arleigh burke class?

Qua manh tau tac trien lien luc dia moi vung nuoc xa bo:

join the Arleigh Burke hull design bandwagon

Yo8 forgot 16 harpoons

这年头 韩吹是真的不多见 大家且珍惜吧

@leadertom8543

Жыл бұрын

多得是，失踪大王日常第一，习惯就好

This is only popular because of Modern Warships.

someday philippine navy have like this most fightr ship...

@user-jg9qr9is3f

Жыл бұрын

글쎄 ~~ 얼마나걸릴까 시간이 니가 말한것이 1년전이고 지금도 구입하지못했는데 경제가 좋아져서 꼭 구입할수있기를바란다 브로 ~

I may think it's a great Destroyer, but the Japanese, the Chinese and the Russians might disagree with it being "the best".

@rohitb5834

2 жыл бұрын

yes, and the Indians with their BrahMos Anti ship missile will be " Sure play Russia,China and Japan" , then we will talk lol

@sadasasdas8467

Жыл бұрын

Except there is no other destroyers in Asia that comes close though.. You need to focus on the facts instead of agenda..

@brianfoley4328

Жыл бұрын

@@sadasasdas8467 There's no agenda, just facts. We know the Chinese believe their newest Type 055 is the best (not that I agree), the Japanese are rightly proud of their Atago class Destroyers and the Russians (well maybe I shouldn't have included the Russians)....regardless of what anyone believes about their Destroyers or which one is best...it boils down to many factors...crew capability, Command & Control and national policy all have a role. Remember, it's not the glove, it's the player.

@sadasasdas8467

Жыл бұрын

@@brianfoley4328 They both dont come close though in comparison. The most similar one is Arleigh Burkes and even that the Sejong carries way more. The Japanese Atago is pretty much a watered down version of the Arleigh Burkes in terms of capabilities and Type 055 is pretty much junk along side anything Russia has. What we learned over the past 6 months is that big mouths love to brag and over-estimate their own capabilities. However I do agree that execution is whats most important despite how good the weapon is..

@Maluda_Tech

Жыл бұрын

@@sadasasdas8467 bold of you to say type 055 is a junk lol 😂😂, It’s a junk but America copied it as a similar design will be their next ddgx warship

its free market, export economy permits SK affording hi tech arms. An economic lesson the North Korean ideology dismissed.

Woah woah I respect this ship but I wouldn't say this was the "best". A bit too extreme

@sadasasdas8467

Жыл бұрын

No other destroyer in Asia comes close though...

失踪大王号吗？

There has never been a better time than now for a country to ignore and violate any and all treaties and agreements with the US.

@neilbaird2789

2 жыл бұрын

@David Moore because we aren’t going to do a damn thing about it.

an outdated sea mine sank south korean ships in one hit..

If something is korean that means it's usa technology

Too much eggs in 1 basket... But good as prestige ships. Hopefully it won't get attacked like what happened to USS Mason. Just 1 error, & even that will be crippled by a single cheap cruise missile

*laughs in anything Japanese AEGIS and Frigates

Surely one top in Asia, how dare compare with paper spec one..

Yo siempre pense que una de las marinas mas poderosas del mundo era la de Japon

@gomipajgd125

Жыл бұрын

If the South Korean Navy and the Japanese Navy fight, Japan will lose because Japan will have higher performance and occupancy and the number of ships held by Japan is more overwhelming.

Antti ballistic defense interceptor......missille

@r_ic7

Жыл бұрын

phil need this warship

It's a good destroyer i play with it in MODERN WARSHIP MOBILE GAME😅

It even bested the latest Arleigh Burke

how about 055type？

👍😎🍺🍩🚢

+15 social credits

Not a foreign jerk, but domestic one where others and myself must stop video to lookup, to compare other ships, how long in feet 169 meters is. Just so creator can feel smug at his audience insuring fewer future views.

Dapat 4 na destroyer na arliegh. 2 otago puede na malakas na yan plus 30 to 35 corvette OK malas na yan navy Hindi na tinag at matibag

Probably better than the Chinese rust-buckets.

how does it compare to the Type 055

@sadasasdas8467

Жыл бұрын

its not even worth a comparison.. Thats why its called the best destroyer in asia

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

​​@@sadasasdas8467 It has an inferior PESA radar compared to Type-055's superior and more sophisticated AESA radar, Sejong carries far less powerful anti-ship missiles and is less stealthy (not really relevant).

however this ship's anti air is pooooor, but it has lots of missile slots and torpedo launcher which makes it strong

@logicinjector5402

2 жыл бұрын

? Do you realize those VLS cells are mainly filled with Anti-missile/anti-plane missles?

何でも詰め込んだコンビニ艦でした‼️船はバランスが大事のイメージ覆す結果に‼️

@razor1uk610

2 жыл бұрын

@Huang Jianhao Don't worry, the slandering comment poster is either PRC, DPRK or is one of those few racist-mindset Imperially ultra-far-right Japanese, who are living in the past surrounded by lies and ignorance

@kevinalcanzado974

2 жыл бұрын

@@razor1uk610 what did he said I don't understand japanese

It is just scrap, because it has the technology of the Arleigh Burke class destroyer, the destroyer that was hacked and rendered useless by Russian fighter planes from the Soviet era, that is, it is only a destroyer that cannot be compared with its competitors, in addition to this technology supposedly classified American is just selling smoke, because the rival navies already know it very well, this explains why it was hacked and rendered useless by obsolete Russian electronic warfare planes, I don't even want to think what their most advanced fighters would do, in short it's just False advertising of Lockheed Martin, to generate more sales to foolish countries. With respect to South Korea, it is not really a naval power, since it does not manufacture its own propulsion technologies, but it is technology borrowed from other countries such as the United States through General Electric and the United Kingdom through Rolls-Royce, this It allows these countries to control the economy and military production of South Korea in case of military and political disagreements, creating geopolitical dependency, this about the best destroyer in Asia is just sensational news and Fake News.

A nice copy of a Burke

世宗大王，不是大帝

No its not.

Maya, 055: Am I a joke to you?

Indian Visky class is the most powerful ship in Asia

🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭👊🤝

this is the baddest warship on the planet - if we're talking youngest...surface combatant. the baddest oldest warship has to be the Kirov. and, if we're going ancient-baddest, it would be HMS Victory. if baddest means WWII baddest, still floating, the American battleship...USS Missouri...i don't even know if it's still floating. the baddest warship of all time? - Yamato or Musashi. not the Bismarck. Scharnhorst was pretty bad. the Hood was just plain bad. the biggest warship of all time? - American Super-carriers. most lethal warship? - nuclear submarines attack and/or ballistic.

世宗大王，帝跟王不一樣

🇮🇳❤️🇰🇷

type 55 renhai is better

@canda8350

2 жыл бұрын

that's destoryer is not aegis combat system. do not compared with aegis system.

@luhutpenganutsaksijehovah1947

2 жыл бұрын

@@canda8350 lol 055 system are comparable with aegis

@canda8350

2 жыл бұрын

@@luhutpenganutsaksijehovah1947 Are you kidding me? it is possibal to comparable with Aegis? Aegis has been developing it for over 20 years.

@luhutpenganutsaksijehovah1947

2 жыл бұрын

@@canda8350 so as chinese developed own LR radars series for 20 years, maybe much a bit backward because US already put AN/SPY aegis in ships more earlier. Aegis and chinese H/LJG-346, both from its size and power generation need for the radar are comparable, so as the power emitted and the range.

@MiG23ML

2 жыл бұрын

@@canda8350 aegis is not that good

AB class on steroid