Secrets of the Universe: Neil Turok Public Lecture

Ғылым және технология

How did the universe begin? How did it evolve to what we see now?
In his Perimeter Public Lecture webcast on October 25, 2023, Perimeter Director Emeritus Neil Turok shared his insights into the basic laws of the universe and their surprising simplicity - including his latest work on an alternative to the cosmological inflation model.
Turok is an internationally renowned cosmologist who has collaborated with luminaries such as the late Stephen Hawking. He is the Higgs Chair of Theoretical Physics at the University of Edinburgh, and holds the Carlo Fidani Roger Penrose Distinguished Visiting Research Chair at Perimeter.
Perimeter Institute (charitable registration number 88981 4323 RR0001) is the world’s largest independent research hub devoted to theoretical physics, created to foster breakthroughs in the fundamental understanding of our universe, from the smallest particles to the entire cosmos. Perimeter public events are made possible in part by the support of donors like you. Be part of the equation: perimeterinstitute.ca/inspiri...
Subscribe for updates on future webcasts, events, free posters, and more: insidetheperimeter.ca/newslet...
/ perimeter
/ pioutreach
/ perimeterinstitute
/ perimeter-institute
Donate: perimeterinstitute.ca/give-today

Пікірлер: 499

  • @justaguy6100
    @justaguy61005 ай бұрын

    I spend too much emotional capital listening to the problems of our political landscape. I come to these videos of lectures given by rational, intelligent, intellectually curious people to remind myself that they, and I hope I can say we, still exist. I hope there are enough of us engaged enough to turn the tide of the irrational mobs that will, if they can manage to do so, overrun virtually every intellectual pursuit left to humanity.

  • @marktimothy2380

    @marktimothy2380

    5 ай бұрын

    What a beautiful post. Thank you 🙏

  • @egay86292

    @egay86292

    5 ай бұрын

    you're an emotional capitalist? nice!

  • @justaguy6100

    @justaguy6100

    5 ай бұрын

    Very little return on that, of late@@egay86292

  • @sevengrapes1257

    @sevengrapes1257

    4 ай бұрын

    Lovely!

  • @ej2796

    @ej2796

    4 ай бұрын

    Agreed. I'm glad to see Neil Turok again. I love his lectures.

  • @draxiedru
    @draxiedru5 ай бұрын

    Besides his obvious profound intelligence and curiosity I find Prof Turok to be equally humble and human. So many of the world’s other notable theorists are just so inaccessible and seem insulted when their theories are challenged.

  • @philiprice6961
    @philiprice69615 ай бұрын

    Whether or not Turok is on to something this was a masterclass in presentation and exposition. The students at Edinburgh are so lucky!

  • @deepdusto

    @deepdusto

    5 ай бұрын

    I felt the same, it is immaculate, an example of how to present information. A question though, new to this: for e.g. 11:18s the Cosmic wave background spectrum, Boltzmann curve x-axis is depicted with frequency, whereas the normal (and yet identical curve I find) show x-axis in wavelength. How could the 2 curves be identical when wavelength is the inverse (opposite) of frequency?

  • @ralphstuurman1468

    @ralphstuurman1468

    4 ай бұрын

    Great presentation.Thank you Prof Turok

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546

    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546

    2 ай бұрын

    try learning CIG Theory

  • @randallrutherford1384

    @randallrutherford1384

    18 сағат бұрын

    Turok!

  • @timveseli
    @timveseli6 ай бұрын

    Unbelievable that you can listen to some of the greatest minds in our time. Turok is brilliant.

  • @mitseraffej5812

    @mitseraffej5812

    6 ай бұрын

    Yes, with all that is available via the Internet there really is no excuse for the unabashed ignorance that pervades some Western societies.

  • @-Lotek-The-B0T-ASSASS1N

    @-Lotek-The-B0T-ASSASS1N

    5 ай бұрын

    @@mitseraffej5812 I live in the Southern United States, i know precisely what you mean unfortunately. The silver lining in the situation is that the most ignorant tend to be the loudest, whilst the rest of us are just scratching our heads. Critical Thinking 101 should be a mandatory class in high school. Unfortunately the powers that be really love the uneducated. Gee i wonder who i could be talking about...

  • @mattblack6736

    @mattblack6736

    5 ай бұрын

    I quite liked Turok 2 on N64, great game!

  • @silent00planet

    @silent00planet

    5 ай бұрын

    nonsense science is not near to answering the big questions there is no progress just speculation you might as well ask a sci-fi writer

  • @itzybitzyspyder
    @itzybitzyspyder5 ай бұрын

    I wish I could have caught this live. I'm just a lowly butcher, but science is my first and truest love.

  • @Tagurrit

    @Tagurrit

    3 ай бұрын

    Why is being a butcher lowly? My grandfather was a butcher and he was among the brightest men I’ve known! Besides we all have to eat! Your job is important!!! ❤❤❤

  • @vhawk1951kl

    @vhawk1951kl

    Ай бұрын

    *Whose* science *of_ what*? Why the Uriah Heep act?

  • @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    3 күн бұрын

    What about knives ? Fare thee well.

  • @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    3 күн бұрын

    Me Indian meditation teacher said this: 'Why not ? A butcher can be a saint.' Fare thee well.

  • @johnsiman5063
    @johnsiman50636 ай бұрын

    Turok: “It tells us its secrets.” Recall Shakespeare’s lines: “And this our life, exempt from public haunt, finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks, sermons in stones, and good in everything.”

  • @jestermoon

    @jestermoon

    6 ай бұрын

    Amen 🙏 No gods required or seen in my foxhole for 40 years. 36:35 I love you sir. 36:58 🎉 37:05 ❤❤ WOW? 37:30 37:39 LAMDA 37:52 genius at play 38:17 🎉

  • @stevenpahoulis4649

    @stevenpahoulis4649

    6 ай бұрын

    20:07 20:14 20:15 20:15 20:18

  • @ShonMardani

    @ShonMardani

    5 ай бұрын

    In the formula F=ma, a has a time variable which means F = 0 when time = 0 and Force can not be calculated unless you provide time duration. The parameter a Acceleration is due to the Gravity and Gravity has a set vector / direction, 0 to 180 degree, in other words there is NO Acceleration if there is NO Gravity, and in Gravity direction and Time needed. Force is 0 (zero) unless you give a non zero time.This is what scientists have been hiding and the space time scam is to explain a flawed formula using the gang leader einstein. E=mc2 is also False since you can change the constant 2 to 3 or any other number, it has no effect because E has no Unit. Also all the formulas mentioned as the successor to E=mc2, has the Time variable with the value 0 (zero) which makes all the calculated Forces, Energies and Vectors Zero. Additionally einstein never wrote and published any of these formulas and no other scientist wanted to claim Fallacy.

  • @spiralsun1

    @spiralsun1

    3 ай бұрын

    Shakespeare should have said books in trees and tongues in running brooks. He was incorrect. Thanks for the quote.

  • @vhawk1951kl

    @vhawk1951kl

    Ай бұрын

    To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow, Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying *Nothing*. Also courtesy of that esoteric school that hid behind the name Shakespeare.

  • @danielpaulson8838
    @danielpaulson88386 ай бұрын

    Mind blown. Thank you for making this available for us. What a wonderful opportunity to have access to the worlds greatest thinkers and researchers. Somehow I feel as if we step back far enough, we would see our life emergent from the flotsam of increasingly complex energy waves. Life is freaking amazing.

  • @simonsmedley5434

    @simonsmedley5434

    5 ай бұрын

    Calm down Dear!

  • @danielpaulson8838

    @danielpaulson8838

    5 ай бұрын

    @@simonsmedley5434 Only when lethargy for life experience sets in. I may not get there.

  • @mikaelbiilmann6826
    @mikaelbiilmann68264 ай бұрын

    Love these videos. A lot I still don't understand, but whenever a little piece falls into place, I am so happy.

  • @garystevason1658
    @garystevason16586 ай бұрын

    Neil Turok, future Nobel winner for Enlightenment, aces it in his last answer; reaching so high effortlessly, he can't but take the prize. Thank you for catching me up over the past fifty years. Perimeter is fortunate to have captured a place in your heart. I'm sure you'll be back one day with more stories from the event horizon.

  • @randallrutherford1384

    @randallrutherford1384

    18 сағат бұрын

    Turok trilogy on Nintendo switch

  • @evo1ov3
    @evo1ov36 ай бұрын

    "It would be called Enlightenment." Nice! Distinctly fitting summarization & clear conjunction to the acutely mind-blowing cliffhanger of a lecture. Mr. Turok gave with the Simplicity of Everything at PI in 2015 as Director.

  • @semmering1
    @semmering16 ай бұрын

    I trully love such smart and clever people - thank you for bringing this excellent talk in KZread to us.

  • @Stadtpark90
    @Stadtpark906 ай бұрын

    4:53 talk starts here Edit: Could have needed bookmarks to jump to the new stuff (edit: note to self: jump to 41:26 ; the real bomb gets dropped 57:56). Pretty slow start; even a bit tedious to watch the beginning. 19:30 our model of the universe: Lambda CDM 22:02 promises minimal theory: starts talking about critical behavior and phase transitions; (foreshadowing) 28:09 promises easy solution to the Big Bang; (more foreshadowing) 34:00 smallest and biggest lengths you could even theoretically ever see: introducing Planck Length and Lambda Horizon; (at Planck Length a photon of that wavelength would form a Black Hole, so light can not escape; at Lambda Horizon distance, space expands faster than c, so that this light can never reach us) 38:13 “These are all the laws we know.” - reiterating that maybe there are no more “new particles” (- even more foreshadowing) 39:27 The Standard Model (insert usual picture) 40:31 Three Generations of Particles, but why? (- more foreshadowing) About time we came to the good stuff (- the things I hadn’t heard before) 41:26 right handed Neutrinos (Seesaw mechanism) as good candidate for Dark Matter 43:18 predicting the cosmic abundance of right handed neutrinos via CPT-symmetry; the Big Bang as a mirror 46:29 so: what if right handed Neutrinos are Dark Matter? A stable and heavy right handed Neutrino would imply the lightest normal, left handed Neutrino to be massless! There are measurements underway to constrain the mass of the Neutrino. 48:32 nice side effect: Penrose gets his “conformal Big Bang” 51:47 claim / argument for why the cosmos is as it is: entropic reasoning 57:56 “NO ADDITIONAL SMOOTHING OR FLATTENING MECHANISM IS REQUIRED.” Turok pulling a UNO Reverse on the Inflationists. A true Laplace-vs-Napoleon-move: ”I had no need for this hypothesis, Sire.” 😂 Mic-Drop-Moment 59:01 the problem of mm-scale-gravitational-wave-detectors 1:00:38 The origin of the three generations and structure formation: introducing 36 zero-dimensional-fields to get rid of infinite vacuum energy On second viewing: this seems a little light on the details… P.S.: You plug in a measurement from Particle Physics / The LHC into your formula and receive a value that equals a measurement from Cosmology / The Planck CMB satellite to almost two decimal points. - How does that tell me anything about how you chose your formula? Maybe you chose it in a way that it fits? You introduced 36 new constants of nature for this?? How is that progress? How is this the end of the talk?? This should be the beginning of a talk! Does this count as an explanation? - You could have produced a rabbit from a hat like that, for all I know! Are you sure you didn’t just put in the rabbit in the first place? Forget all the hand movements and the name dropping: what exactly did you do? I just have to admit that I did not understand a thing.

  • @Barnaclebeard
    @BarnaclebeardАй бұрын

    This tab has been sitting in by browser for 4 months, I'm glad I finally watched it. I cannot tell you how relieved I am to learn that Turok finally has cosmology under control.

  • @leftofright
    @leftofright5 ай бұрын

    I love this conversation. I would love to understand how long cycle gravitational waves can be explained within this theory. In my perception. I always figured it never become as a singularity and that the wavelength of light stretched over time, creating the red shifts and make galaxies appear to be travelling away when they weren't. It's been a long journey of trying to figure it all out.

  • @whirledpeas3477
    @whirledpeas34776 ай бұрын

    My main man Neil never disappoints ❤

  • @aclearlight
    @aclearlight6 ай бұрын

    A truly wonderful exposition. So profound yet also very accessible. It takes a true master to make it look this easy. 🖖🌠🌈🛸🦄

  • @msm1723
    @msm17236 ай бұрын

    This is what we all being waiting for since The Astonishing Simplicity!

  • @whtfsh765
    @whtfsh7656 ай бұрын

    As always Neil Turok provided a very informative talk. My only criticism is that the shots of the audience during the talk were rather distracting.

  • @thomasparisi5333
    @thomasparisi53336 ай бұрын

    Live long and prosper Turok 🖖

  • @dm4859
    @dm48595 ай бұрын

    A privilege to sit in on this lecture from home. Thank you.

  • @constpegasus
    @constpegasus6 ай бұрын

    The best lecture yet🎉

  • @Psychx_
    @Psychx_5 ай бұрын

    Finally another public lecture. I've been missing those a lot! And then it's even with Neil the legend Turok himself :D

  • @randallrutherford1384

    @randallrutherford1384

    18 сағат бұрын

    Turok trilogy on N64

  • @warrenmanning7991
    @warrenmanning79916 ай бұрын

    I was watching this during the Rugby World Cup Final to calm my nerves.. We won Prof Turok! 🇿🇦

  • @mitseraffej5812

    @mitseraffej5812

    6 ай бұрын

    And from NZ, we lost. There could not have been a more worthy opponent.

  • @warrenmanning7991

    @warrenmanning7991

    6 ай бұрын

    @@mitseraffej5812 #Respect

  • @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    3 күн бұрын

    @@mitseraffej5812 As long as sport wins - with ethics and joy and exercise done. Fare thee well.

  • @CASHSEC
    @CASHSEC5 ай бұрын

    Definition of Theoretical Physics. A continual guesssing game of how things are,tested, accepted or rejected,including many fudge factors to make the maths work. Though not being able to understand most of Professor Turocks I really appreciate that throughout his talk it is punctuated with "maybe" or is "just theory".

  • @Cat_Woods
    @Cat_Woods6 ай бұрын

    I get that it seems simple to Neil, but honestly, even the stuff I thought I understood ok, when he explains it, I realize, wow, I REALLY don't understand this. No shade. I just think he understands these things at a level I'm nowhere near. (...going to replay it a bunch more times to see if I can get it a bit more)

  • @danielpaulson8838

    @danielpaulson8838

    3 ай бұрын

    Listening to this repeatedly is the right thing to do. I used to work with a guy who could repeat sitcom lines because he watched them repeatedly. We CAN pick how we wire our brains. Even if we don’t start out in life knowing that. What happens to FAUX viewers. They become what they consume.

  • @nowhereman8374
    @nowhereman83746 ай бұрын

    Kudos, thank you Neil and thank you Perimeter

  • @simplenumber
    @simplenumber6 ай бұрын

    I waited new Neil Turok video for like a four month and I smashed that link 20 seconds after it became available. Since I heard it first I trust Neil approach much more than I trust string-theory-multiverse-inflation bad infinity. I believe Astonishing Simplicity is actually the way.

  • @TheMikesylv
    @TheMikesylv6 ай бұрын

    He is definitely on to something, I have always asked why everything looks the same a egg in a pan a hurricane a solar system a galaxy a tornado the pedals on a flower the spiral of shells and so on it says the geometry is simple at the core. Wolfgram said that very simple rules can lead to complex systems.

  • @lynxissiodorensis2319
    @lynxissiodorensis23196 ай бұрын

    Very interesting ideas. Thanks for the lecture.

  • @GeneralSulla
    @GeneralSulla6 ай бұрын

    It's almost like Turok has explained a reduction in soup into its constituent parts that makes the whole dish possible and tasty. No need for magical cooks. Just the ingredients. I like that concoction much better than the fanciful explanations of imaginative, clever theorists. Just a great soup recipe that makes sense. Now the last question was about the cook in a roundabout way. Why did it all happen? I say, why not?

  • @ThomAnno
    @ThomAnno6 ай бұрын

    Always a fenomenaal lecture. Good to know born South Africans are doing well in the USA. Dearest Regards, From South Africa.

  • @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    3 күн бұрын

    Yet - firstly - human being - like all of us. Muddling through - with this meaning - nay, truth quest. Also from SA - now in Germany and imbibing spirituality - from Indian meditation. Hee hee. Fare thee well.

  • @FabianRoling
    @FabianRoling3 ай бұрын

    "Maybe we have time for one more quick question. Is it a quick question?" - "Yes. […long monologue…] What is existence?"

  • @ashleyobrien4937
    @ashleyobrien49376 ай бұрын

    Enlightenment indeed ! I am going to study this further, I really think he's cracked it...

  • @Nomad77ca
    @Nomad77ca6 ай бұрын

    Just Wow. Thanks Neil, amazing ideas. Wondering if this theory has a name yet? Also, just a guess, you mentions a relation ship between having 36 dim0 fields and the 2 groups of 6 particles, seems like those fields might give the particles their 3 dimensions, or something to that effect.

  • @ashleyobrien4937

    @ashleyobrien4937

    6 ай бұрын

    yeah, but more like two groups of two, because each group has two extra that are heavier, e

  • @susanochs1927

    @susanochs1927

    6 ай бұрын

    z

  • @123Ghengis

    @123Ghengis

    5 ай бұрын

    His model has a taurus in it. The "Turok Taurus Theory"... or "T^3" ... ?

  • @jimgraham6722
    @jimgraham67226 ай бұрын

    Canada does this type of stuff very well. Its very well done.

  • @d_wigglesworth

    @d_wigglesworth

    5 ай бұрын

    This is partially thanks to the fleeting success of the Blackberry. Watch the movie: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry_(film)

  • @user-hy9nh4yk3p
    @user-hy9nh4yk3p3 күн бұрын

    Here is hoping - that other thinkers and viewers - grant enough space - for Prof Turok - to continue his original thinking. To bring clarity - in his way - to the thought - in physics research. In simplicity - it is quietly apparent - that essence is realised. ( Hint from Raja yoga meditation) Fare thee well.

  • @Jainhospitals
    @Jainhospitals4 ай бұрын

    simply beautiful, elegant presentation

  • @annier6835
    @annier68356 ай бұрын

    I tried, but felt I could not grasp most of this lecture. I watched it again and felt utterly stupid. So glad there are people like Turok to do my thinking for me! I forgive him for making me feel so mentally inadequate. ❤

  • @ronhudson3730

    @ronhudson3730

    5 ай бұрын

    Here's another takeaway... maybe the lecture was written for a selective audience and not for the average, interested layperson. I conceptually understood most of it, but none of the mathematics and I still fell asleep halfway through. The most interesting part was the very last question - which was answered basically with a "we don't know".

  • @jackdrasmussen5849

    @jackdrasmussen5849

    4 ай бұрын

    Hi, Do not feel intimated by these lectures. Give your self credit for sitting through this. If this lecture re sparked wonder and curiosity like you had as a child, That is a good thing!

  • @modallas8034
    @modallas80346 ай бұрын

    Excellent!!! This man is way too smart. 😮

  • @user-on3mz4pv9s
    @user-on3mz4pv9s6 ай бұрын

    According to the supercomputer Deep Thought the answer to the question of life, the universe and everything was 42 (in Douglas Adam's Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy). At 1.05.12 Neil says the critical exponent from Cern and extrapolated becomes 42!

  • @missh1774
    @missh17746 ай бұрын

    Thank you Neil. Very cool 💛 41:10 is the generation puzzle about the bi-direction spiral of the sphere? 44:03 Each human is born with a piece of that copy. Every culture and interpretation of their copy is so important to balance with how we govern and treat each other. 1:02:32 Isn't this why we have a reciprocal relationship with the moon?

  • @para.llaxed
    @para.llaxed3 ай бұрын

    I have been waiting so long for this. Thanks Neil and PI. ⭐

  • @helderalmeida2790
    @helderalmeida27906 ай бұрын

    I really enjoyed his apresentation.

  • @ovidiulupu5575
    @ovidiulupu55756 ай бұрын

    Beautiful.

  • @zeroonetime
    @zeroonetime5 ай бұрын

    Neil Turok I.S. (Infinity Squared) right on "The astonishing simplicity of Everything". Neil Turok, you have shattered the human perception of cosmic ceilings.

  • @zornu
    @zornu6 ай бұрын

    Turok begins at 4:28

  • @Zgembo121

    @Zgembo121

    6 ай бұрын

    👍

  • @kevindarter822
    @kevindarter8225 ай бұрын

    37:10 Love this talk. Just wanted to add that the Higgs boson can not be seen directly, but only inferred from its decay products.

  • @LuciFeric137
    @LuciFeric1376 ай бұрын

    Love Dr. Turok

  • @Jar.in.a.Bottle
    @Jar.in.a.Bottle3 ай бұрын

    Top notch, thank you Neil and PI. Now to ponder and chew over what I've learned over some snacks. Good science and snacks, a cosmic must!

  • @kevindarter822
    @kevindarter8225 ай бұрын

    The Higgs boson can decay into various combinations of particles, depending on its mass and the probabilities of each decay mode. Some of the most common decay modes are: Two photons (H → γγ) Two W bosons (H → WW) Two Z bosons (H → ZZ) Two bottom quarks (H → bb)

  • @sven888

    @sven888

    4 ай бұрын

    Who knows, maybe there is no decay in the absolute sense.

  • @carparkmartian2193

    @carparkmartian2193

    4 ай бұрын

    The useful information here is that the emitted particles emitted are paired with antiparticles. Though your antiparticleschave not been identified.

  • @akpanekpo6025
    @akpanekpo60254 ай бұрын

    Can someone explain to me why I'm addicted to listening to these geniuses even though I haven't the faintest clue what they're talking about?

  • @randallrutherford1384

    @randallrutherford1384

    18 сағат бұрын

    Ha ha

  • @Benedicte1ful
    @Benedicte1ful4 ай бұрын

    its interesting that ancient Egypt has a story about creation and where “light sees its own shadow.”

  • @kevindarter822
    @kevindarter8225 ай бұрын

    37:10 Only through Indirect detection, which means that the Higgs boson is not observed as a single particle, but as a combination of other particles that result from its decay.

  • @BarisSenturk-nd3il
    @BarisSenturk-nd3il5 ай бұрын

    I'm loving with you Neil, you're amazing human being.

  • @joqqy8497
    @joqqy84976 ай бұрын

    Neil has a sane look at science, physics and the cosmos. I am tired of hearing about string theory, multiverses, bubble universes and infinite inflation.

  • @jameslorman4715

    @jameslorman4715

    6 ай бұрын

    Well said....

  • @TiagoCavalcanti-ji6hu
    @TiagoCavalcanti-ji6hu6 ай бұрын

    Breaking the breaking of symmetry shouldn`t have been seen as so far-fetched. So, the Universe cannot tell left from right in the end, huh. Or in the beginning. The way he sold it (virtually flawlessly) made it sound like it solves more problems than it causes from the get-go. Quite a feat already. Cheers!

  • @ChimbzZ
    @ChimbzZ7 күн бұрын

    Physics eases my mind from the chaos that is life

  • @vagnersantos2048
    @vagnersantos20485 ай бұрын

    I admire so much whoever understands 10% of this presentation

  • @TheBinaryUniverse

    @TheBinaryUniverse

    5 ай бұрын

    Thank you

  • @mrmcphilsconfidential8562
    @mrmcphilsconfidential85626 ай бұрын

    Most powerful application of cancellation I've ever seen. He gave us permission to remove the Nutrino L's!

  • @PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm
    @PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm5 ай бұрын

    Science and the universe are something too sublime for me. Thank you for letting ignorant people like me see more of the universe. I really like this channel

  • @FractalWoman
    @FractalWoman6 ай бұрын

    I think there is a typo at the 46:35 mark. Planck mass is 5 x 10^-8 kg (the minus is missing from the 8).

  • @andymccracken4046

    @andymccracken4046

    3 ай бұрын

    He was saying 5x10^8 proton masses - as in half a billion - which I think means these neutrinos are less than a thousandth of the Planck mass.

  • @FractalWoman

    @FractalWoman

    3 ай бұрын

    @@andymccracken4046 You are right. I thought he was talking about Planck mass here which is 5xe-8. My bad.

  • @user-vn4zo6rc1x
    @user-vn4zo6rc1x4 ай бұрын

    Thankyou for your video at last

  • @gcourtjr
    @gcourtjr6 ай бұрын

    Is the point of singularity non-dimensional? And, if not, wouldn't the two sides of the mirrored universe actually expand into overlapping with each other? If they don't overlap each other, then are there gaps between the two universes that also need to be explained?

  • @danielpaulson8838
    @danielpaulson88383 ай бұрын

    Learning about reality makes my heart soar.

  • @tresajessygeorge210
    @tresajessygeorge2105 ай бұрын

    THANK YOU...!!!

  • @uniquemetal
    @uniquemetal5 ай бұрын

    I live in Oxford England. Thank you for this lecture by Neil Turok. I have mentioned this to many of my friends.

  • @bryanpinto4051

    @bryanpinto4051

    5 ай бұрын

    where you live has to do with what?

  • @uniquemetal

    @uniquemetal

    5 ай бұрын

    @@bryanpinto4051 Nothing at all it has to do nothing at all

  • @garystevason1658

    @garystevason1658

    3 ай бұрын

    That's the magic of the past few decades' technology genius, making it now possible for the entire planet to watch a profound lecture in the middle of Canada soon after it concludes. It's been likely the best ten hours I've spent in the last fifty years. Professor Turok presents the magic so well, it seems intuitive, simple, as it merges into our current view of reality. Yes, we will "understand what the hell is going on" as Neil jokingly summarized Physics' quest.

  • @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    @user-hy9nh4yk3p

    3 күн бұрын

    @@uniquemetal A nihilist - makes his/her case known. There are many interesting and vital - nuances - to the reality and especially - the Real Being. Trying for this meaning - is itself - so rewarding. Fare thee well.

  • @mikecope806
    @mikecope8066 ай бұрын

    Turok, you rock!

  • @johnkean6852
    @johnkean68526 ай бұрын

    Plancks k which looks a lot like Newtons G equation. But that curve is a common damping curve used in many areas of science. Sound getting slightly then quieter for example.

  • @robertwood9984
    @robertwood99845 ай бұрын

    Thank you 👍

  • @mobieus7
    @mobieus76 ай бұрын

    15:10 Why can't there be a Doppler effect from these particles?

  • @Zhavlan
    @Zhavlan6 ай бұрын

    Hello from Kazakhstan! You are familiar with Michelson's experiments. (1881) and its improvements for the discovery of gravitational waves (2015) - And that's only 50%. It is possible to continue this experience; Use "from the gyroscopes two non-circular spools of optical fiber." This device, which is located inside the car, measures: inertial speed in a straight line. (the device does not record the movement of the satellite in orbit). I can share ideas for joint invention

  • @thechipbag6531
    @thechipbag65315 ай бұрын

    I have always thought about, as above so below and the fact that the universe is mirrored in atomic level of matter. What has always resonated with me and my research is the fact that we were taught that the universe is teetering on a knife edge and if one little factor had been out of harmony, the universe could collapse. Extrapolating on this, I have always reconciled the model of the universe as more of a result of SUBLIMATION i.e. Going from a solid directly to a gas state or sometime soon, a gas to a solid. The universe then would be more of a cyclical nature of phase change in my opinion. What do you think?

  • @montevideofoodie2527
    @montevideofoodie25276 ай бұрын

    uau one lecture practically explains every cosmological and quantum mystery there is...

  • @Chris.Davies
    @Chris.Davies4 ай бұрын

    I am rather more attracted to the idea of dark matter simply being nanometre dust particles, and dark plasma in the form of hydrogen ions. We live in a plasma universe, and Occam and Newton agree we shouldn't introduce anything new without just cause. If space is has a lot of dust particles of just a few atom or two in size, then high energy photons could hit them directly raising their temperature to thousands of degrees, which - added together would explain what we call the CMB. Then there is the issue of redshift - which we do not fully understand, and it seems likely there is at least one unknown factor which causes light to lose energy over distance. And if that is true, then dark Energy will simply disappear in a puff of inevitable logic. For, just as LaPlace said to Napoleon, "Sire, I had no need of that hypothesis."

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie95515 ай бұрын

    The question about how we observe the BBT is "bang on" Relativity of 1-0-infinity wave-particle coordination-identification positioning.., holography.

  • @user-if1ly5sn5f
    @user-if1ly5sn5f5 ай бұрын

    Each individual water drop in the body pushes and transfers the energy while changing itself. Like 1 hitting 2 and it transfers energy and not only moves in direction but moves in an evolution. It’s more apparent in macro things because we see it easier. The cascade is why it’s so fast but seems so slow now. We can see the patterns because we are those pieces in a form/pattern. We are grown in real time because of the cascade and patterns of growths in the brain. Cells being grown from the input of reality through the senses in a pattern that connects to the other senses patterns like touch or smell combining. The patterns are consistent and are seen in math, geography, and in life itself as well as the spirals in the universe. It’s kinda weird to think about if you think it’s weird so don’t think it’s weird and try to understand before sending hateful comments. Thank you. We grow in tandem with reality just as our cells and us grow and not just grow as in make bigger but shift in form like a butterfly, superpositioning.

  • @robbatayaki5505
    @robbatayaki55054 ай бұрын

    I did not understand much but I think it was good for my neurones connection building anyway😂

  • @someoneinmyhead
    @someoneinmyheadАй бұрын

    Brilliant talk

  • @rogerjohnson2562
    @rogerjohnson25622 ай бұрын

    15:30 is a very inadequate description of 'ultraviolet catastrophy'.

  • @tokajileo5928
    @tokajileo59286 ай бұрын

    charges are result of exchanging photons. if no photon can leave a BH how can a black hole have charge? if charge is information and no information leaves the BH then how a BH can have a charge?

  • @alexishemeon

    @alexishemeon

    6 ай бұрын

    Black holes can have an electric charge from capturing charged particles over time. Charged black holes are known as Kerr-Newman black holes and are described by the Kerr-Newman metric. The electric field produced by a charged black hole still exists within the event horizon. Information about the black hole's charge is not lost but is trapped inside. The charge is a global property of the black hole. It doesn't rely on exchanging individual photons or information escaping the event horizon.

  • @8cccpeevostokzempf
    @8cccpeevostokzempf6 ай бұрын

    The last gentlemen's question seems to hover around Lawrence Krauss's answer to why is there something rather than nothing which he argues (if I understand corredtly) because "Nothing" is unstamble. "Nothing" being otherwise totally empty packets of Planck-level space which are linfinitesmally energized. Further inquisition leads to speculation with regard to First Causes which Krauss argues converts physics to an environmental science.

  • @erwinvangrinsven9345
    @erwinvangrinsven9345Күн бұрын

    Turok is a great Vulcan star-trek character name 👍

  • @DavidBauer-iv9yw
    @DavidBauer-iv9yw4 ай бұрын

    Spirituality is when you connect to the other side then your side will be a little bit brighter

  • @edvardavagyan409
    @edvardavagyan4096 ай бұрын

    In the description of this short video there is a link to a book that proposes a new model of the universe, describes its shape, structure, the mechanisms of its birth and evolution. kzread.info/dash/bejne/ooF30LZxitStm6Q.html Can’t post the link to the book here directly due to youtube’s restrictions.

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie95515 ай бұрын

    It's always NOW => every day is Orientation Day, first-class of everyone's career throughout life in pulse-evolution.

  • @spacepygmy4443
    @spacepygmy44434 ай бұрын

    Neil turok is the man 🎖️

  • @johnkean6852
    @johnkean68526 ай бұрын

    "Look at the large chunk of data - see what fits - [our narrative, and YOU] learn from that!"

  • @user-if1ly5sn5f
    @user-if1ly5sn5f5 ай бұрын

    31:25 the spread is there but you gotta look at the changes made over the span of the spread, the patterns of change within the spread show you something similar to evolution/change over time.

  • @kashrut18
    @kashrut186 ай бұрын

    Great talk. Pity about the basic problem. How to explain the origin of the Big Bang. Inflation Theory, hmmm, not bad but it is still lacking something. It is not smooth, it just doesn't quite gel. Still Prof. Turok shows a great ability to think outside the box (sorry about the pun). His discussion with Dr Brian Keating last year demonstrated his realisation that some new insight is required to smooth out the complications that have been introduced over the last 20-30 years. String Theory et al. I will stay tuned to hear futher developments

  • @JustNow42
    @JustNow4215 күн бұрын

    It seems actually very reasonable that there are gravity that attract mass and a force that disperse mass in analogi with electric fields. So there may be a connection between these ? Gravity is compressed space where time goes slower and dark energy is diluted space where time goes faster. Now we just need an equation and a Nobel price

  • @KennethiSlite
    @KennethiSlite5 ай бұрын

    Very interesting!

  • @leonhardtkristensen4093
    @leonhardtkristensen40935 ай бұрын

    The lecture is very interesting. I enjoyed listening to it. I do not understand a lot of it and I don't think I ever will. I there fore attempt to think more about what I have learned from my own education in connection with my life long experiences in the electronic field. With that I have come to the following conclusions: E=hf or (hv) where h is a constant and is the frequency tells me that each cycle has exactly the same value. The increasing the value at higher frequency is that there is more of cycles each second. Higher frequencies have more energy in time but not for each cycle. In my module of the universe everything is made out of waves. That is there are no particles just a collection of standing wave's. The observation of particles is just because we can not see what the particles are made of. If any body can tell me how the energy EM waves are actually physically there I am very interested. That is basically what is energy.

  • @0.618-0
    @0.618-05 ай бұрын

    The gravitational waves detected by Ligo are some shockwave travelling through spacetime and matter. According to GR, gravity results from the curvature of STime due to matter density. This LIGO detection is not gravity as we know it on earth is it? Two black hiles merging would result in intense gravational forces, so how can gravity be ejected away from the event horizons merger, waves are eminating in a spiral fashion outward, overcoming the speed of light? What am i missing as it doesnt compute....

  • @lanceburris7850
    @lanceburris785024 күн бұрын

    I am a writer and artist who happens to have a basic education in mathematics, physics, and the history of science. I am not an academic or professional mathematician or physicist. As an artist I have found the current scientific consensus suspect because it is based upon the wrong frame of reference which has led to the misinterpretation of the observational evidence. Unless you truly understand the mechanics of perception, you have no idea what you are looking at. In 1976 I had an epiphany in which I saw the other half of the universe. I began writing books of metaphysical philosophy and developed what I call the Apollonian System which introduces a new coordinate system, new paradigm for time, space, and light, and a new visual vocabulary enabling one to conceptualize a four-dimensional, conscious universe governed by the principles of four-dimensional geometry and the mathematics of the infinite. There are no natural laws, only a conscious singularity and mathematics. There was no Big Bang, and there are no material particles. The Standard Model of Particle Physics is the modern equivalent of counting angels on pinheads since particles are the product of our perceptual limitations. We digitize the perceptual world. Since I am an individual and not part of the academic establishment, I can get no one in the academic community to talk to me. Therefore, I propose to go directly to the public using the indirection of art. I am now in the process of completing a major painting exhibition which allows the viewer to experience an alternative to our culture's current scientific model of reality. Perhaps Professor Turok should read my book titled "Apollonian Coordinate System, the Mechanics of Perception from a Fourth-Dimensional Perspective. Toward a Deductive Metaphysical Science of Conscious Being" which is available on Amazon. It takes a radically different approach to understanding the universe and our place within it if we are to escape from the safe space of the scientific consensus. My metaphysics overturns much of the current scientific consensus by freeing science from the materialist philosophy imposed in the seventeenth century by the Scientific Method. The astronomers studying the images sent by the JWST have no idea what they are looking at. Lance Burris.

  • @kaarlimakela3413
    @kaarlimakela34135 ай бұрын

    Yeah. Pretty much what I thought. 😅😅😅 Seriously, folks. You got simplicity, beauty, symmetry. I almost nearly sort of get it! 😊

  • @bretnetherton9273
    @bretnetherton92736 ай бұрын

    Awareness is the only constant of all experience what could be more fundamental to reality than that? Awareness is known by awareness alone.

  • @ronaldronald8819

    @ronaldronald8819

    6 ай бұрын

    Talking about mysteries. Awareness like the Universe are. I think it is beautiful that we can marvel about mysteries. Is A.I heading for awareness ? ? Could you argue: Awareness is an attribute of the Universe and therefore that the Universe is self-aware ?

  • @ianclarke5404
    @ianclarke54045 ай бұрын

    Marvelous

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397Ай бұрын

    Realy I like this video its interestyng

  • @sonarbangla8711
    @sonarbangla87116 ай бұрын

    True to his traditional 'simple explanation' Turok did a good job, although he himself admits more work is needed to establish what he claims. I would like to mention just one mistake when he tried to explain 'imaginary time'. Imaginary number is a mathematical object and i is defined in VISUAL COMPLEX ANALYSIS by Tristan Needham (page 217) as the ratio of the change in y due to change in x in the complex number z= x+iy, so that change in y(effect) and change in x (cause) implies i=effect/cause. In the context of explaining Penrose's CPT the real time and imaginary time may not have the physical explanation claimed by Turok as thermodynamic and quantum mechanical i. In fact Penrose claimed Higgs field emerged after big bang and at the end of big bang it disappeared (without any proof). Otherwise much of what Turok said made a lots of sense, except vacuum's properties. As for an explanation of quantum universe, it is far from simple, Turok as a theoretician may need to formulate how probabilistic QF transform into deterministic QC, that troubled Einstein as 'incomplete QM'. QM is yet to be called a THEORY, being just a set of rules. Even QC function doesn't have an algorithm, so it fails to qualify for error correcting system.

  • @alienfields959
    @alienfields959Ай бұрын

    Neil has it figured out!

Келесі