Amazing how isabelle manages to convey so much by doing so little, I think that is one of the key scenes, she's trying to keep all her feelings inside, whilst really she knows her barriers are collapsing! incredible performance.

I love how Haneke kept the camera very far away from Isabelle in the beginning (anyone else would have given a close-up to her facial expressions when Walter came in), only getting closer and closer to her as the music transits from Schöneberg to Schubert, and as her psychological defense collapses.

@clan_fraser19

2 жыл бұрын

YES!

Huppert is a supreme actress, I just love her

Isabelle is like living painting. Absolutely enchanting.

So, Op.33b Schoenberg; Prelude Op. 23 no. 5 Rachmaninoff; Schubert D959 Sonata movements 2nd and 3rd

@egornashilov5449

7 жыл бұрын

I just want to kiss your face.

@ZafarIqbal-ex3oh

6 жыл бұрын

afterboring dgj6r9lbv i

@nicolasbouchard454

5 жыл бұрын

thank you so much

@robonick3607

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you.

I really love this movie.

Love this movie!

Mon Dieu ... Quelle scène ! Sublimes tous les deux !

The best Huppert!!!😍😍I love her!!!

A truly wonderful film, with exquisite music and an actress like Huppert who is really brilliant ..!

Un film indimenticabile che fa molto pensare....

Isabelle Huppert est très jolie, et elle joue très bien! bravo :)

It's Rachmaninov Prelude Op.23 No.5 one of my favorite:)

@evaternal

5 ай бұрын

thank you

My favorite movie from Haneke.

Her eyes

i love this film so much

Una grande interpretazione di I.Huppert straordinariamente sexy nella sua doppia vita. Mi fa veramente impazzire!

Esta escena es sencillamente brutal. Y qué decir de la Huppert? Pues que está fantástica, como siempre.

At 2:23 it's Schubert Piano Sonata in A major D 959

Oh and the first piece he plays I think is Schoenberg piano piece op 33b

Rachmaninoff & Schubert -- it is an audition, and he started for the first in the list.

I think it's Rachmaninov, Prelude Opus 23 No.5.

Minute 2:00 it's Schubert. Min. 1:00 it's Rachmaninov

Please, anyone can identify de music at 1:12???????

0:56 is Rachmininoff, now in full scale: kzread.info/dash/bejne/f2yG27l_cZq2g7w.html But hesitate, don´t provoke him with an ice hockey stick, when he´s walking in the park. Otherwise you´ll suffer the consquences: kzread.info/dash/bejne/oZmdmLiLg7Han5c.html

I adore Benoit Magimel - as a actor and as a incredible beautiful men (especially in films from the beginning of this century: 'Fleur de mal' and 'Mademoiselle de honore' of Claude Chabrol and, yes, this film of Haneke very much too). I am so sorry, that he is not gay. Or maybe he is, who know? I think, he have some homosexual side, as a deep, but clear, cold and silent secret, which he never will live openly. Very sad indeed...

@mateopeltier767

2 жыл бұрын

this is such a weird thing to comment

@narizota

2 жыл бұрын

@@mateopeltier767 literally like wtf lmfaooo

@11Garrett11

Жыл бұрын

I agree it would be a sad thing if it were true (as I believe it is true for MANY men because homosexuality is what we are shamed about the most), but if it’s not true and that’s not the case then it’s not sad at all & just your fantasy : )

@user-wu3ly6cl3b

7 ай бұрын

Lol what are you on about 😂

@Max-fb5bm

4 ай бұрын

@@user-wu3ly6cl3bHes on that Nut Pack 💦

Schoenberg 1874, Rachmaninoff 1873, Beethoven? 1770, Schubert 1797. chronological order?

@eraserheadjosefk no it's rachmaninov!

Wtf? Why did he go from Schoenberg directly into the Rachmaninoff like that??? Ridiculous edit. And none of you commentors noticed this?

@gereonrath6601

3 жыл бұрын

Dude it is just a cut. Everyone realizes it.

@djmotise

3 жыл бұрын

@@gereonrath6601 Says every mediocre editor and music consultant.

@gereonrath6601

3 жыл бұрын

@@djmotise You are a son of a bitch. Suck my cock.

@EM-xj8hy

Жыл бұрын

Why are you so stupid?

@jpeg204

Жыл бұрын

It is a jump cut to show the passage of time, how is that so confusing to you? The purpose of the scene is to show her reaction to his playing, not to be a spectacle of the music itself, thus it does a jump cut instead of showing the performance in its entirety because that would be unnecessary, the cut makes perfect sense

God awful scene. The ONLY reason the camera is on Hubert is to avoid showing the pianist who is not really playing what we hear. RIDICULOUS. And the director doesn't think we know this?

@louisxav1091

5 жыл бұрын

The actors really played piano on this film.

@m.l.pianist2370

4 жыл бұрын

The focus of this scene isn't the performance itself but its effect on Erika. We obviously wouldn't be able to see that effect if the camera focused on the pianist's hands the whole time.

@gereonrath6601

3 жыл бұрын

Fucking asshole, fuck you

@isabel8489

3 жыл бұрын

what an idiot.. important thing in this scene is her feeling and anxiety not piano technique

@BuffaloBuffalo-uc6zp

2 жыл бұрын

Well spotted. !