I really enjoy Samsung's camera this year but there's one thing I prefer on almost every Vivo phone which uses vivo's chips, which is the low light HDR, it just makes every tiny light look alright and controlled while maintaining the overall bright look of the night mode I tend to like

The Vivo suffers from excessive local contrast enhancement, which creates contrast and saturation in detailed areas but causes gradients and curves to appear weirdly crushed. There was also annoying jello in the Vivo video, which reveals a rolling shutter. Today that should be considered a rookie error in the design of a quality phone camera. Samsung's focus wasn't as consistent as Vivo's. That was surprising. Esp for the zooms. Samsung's fake Bokeh had more reliable object detection, but Vivo's did a better job of looking like a real large lens - Samsung's is a simple gaussian blur. Vivo also seemed to have better noise control. Whether that was due to actually gathering more light, or by superior AI noise reduction - that would require more detailed testing. However that AI noise reduction seems to be responsible for the weird beard inpainting. More training required. So if you want higher video resolution, get the Samsung. If you don't care about that, get the Vivo.

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

Valid and more technical analysis there. Thanks

@linuxgeex

Жыл бұрын

@@GadgetsBoy There's two tests I'd like you to add, if you're interested. Both are low-light tests. The first? Shoot the Moon. I'm finding that the new cellphone cameras are refusing to focus on the Moon, and/or they completely blow it out so there's no detail, just a yellow/white disc. The second? Find a light garden without ambient lighting and shoot a model with the lights behind them when the sky is dark. Again I'm finding modern phones struggle and blow out the lights, esp when there's a person in the scene. Cyan Yellow and Magenta lights in particular end up white with a pale colour fringe. An example from your video would be the stoplight tree. The lamps were partially blown out by the Vivo - the centres were white where they should have been vibrant red/yellow/green. The Samsung didn't blow it out, but suffered from hazy edges due to internal lens reflections. The Vivo's coatings made it a hero for that challenging scene. Maybe the internal reflections affected Samsung's PDAF?

@Phoenix56801

Жыл бұрын

r/iamverysmart just kidding 😂, this a detailed comment, love it

@RJGURRI

Жыл бұрын

@@linuxgeex how would u rate vivo x90 pro vs xiaomi 13 pro vs pixel 7 Pro for camera including video too

@omarreid7222

Жыл бұрын

Just buy a dslr man lol

It's swapped your facial hair for someone elses 🤣🤣🤣

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

loool picasso

Very unfair comparison since X90 Pro Plus should be the real rival for S23 Ultra but I'm really surprised to see that also X90 Pro is better than S23 Ultra in almost every situation. Not in zoom shot of course.

This guy makes my day everyday. Good vibes. Positive face. I'm happy 😅🙂

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

😄😄 thank you

Have said these 3 years in a row.. since X70 pro came out up until now Vivo X90 Pro, no phones in the world can beat this monster in low light, its just the best in the world, 3 year in a row. I have used X70 Pro and X80 Pro, and i have compared to other flagships like S22+, iphone 13 Pro Max, Google Pixel.. nothing came close in low light performance,period

@rajanbgmiyt

8 ай бұрын

I had the x70 pro plus currently using the OnePlus Open....x70 pro plus is best in terms of cameras

Those portraits at 13:10 are really great. Pretty incredible that phones can take pictures like that tbh.

What s about zoom, who s more sharper in photo zoon x100 and video x15 zoom?

Great comparison! However, the X90 Pro is a mid-tier flagship like the S23/S23 Plus. The X90 Pro Plus vs S23 Ultra is a more complete comparison.

Superb comparison.. How do u rate xiaomi 13 pro vs vivo x90 pro vs pixel 7 Pro for photos and videos That is the big question

Surprised to see that the x90 pro holds great even beats S23 Ultra on photos . Imagine the x90 pro plus .

@adyady3099

Жыл бұрын

i have both x90 pro+ and s23 ultra and vivo is a clear win, in indoor and low light even zoom looks better on vivo

@Vendettanino

Жыл бұрын

@@adyady3099 i know . Its obvious

@RJGURRI

Жыл бұрын

@@adyady3099 bro iam trying to zero in on which to. Buy.. My budget is till x90 pro price.. I have heard the only diff x90 pro has is it doesn't have the pro plus multi zoom. Periscope lens and a lesser processor...everything else in the camera is the same.. is that true..?? The only other options iam considering are xiaomi 13 pro and pixel 7 Pro.. What r ur thoughts

@adyady3099

Жыл бұрын

@@RJGURRI x90 pro+ all the way, better camera, cpu, better display etc. Xiaomi's software sucks.

@RJGURRI

Жыл бұрын

@@adyady3099 I was talking abut x90 pro as in India we want get the plus version.. That vs the pixel 7 Pro..

Good job overall, I think X90 Pro sensor size is good for some cases but in general S23U is more balanced and flexible camera setup overall and more consistent.

Excellent and very fair comparison...I prefer VIVO...

Samsung is over sharpening again, don't like that - Vivo in for the win here 👍

Thank you

5:29 crazy that s23 can read the tire size. Just zoom in on the wheels.

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

Oh yeh, I didn't even think about doing that lol

Ordered Vivo X90 Pro plus for me and my gf few days ago. Prefer the vivo's design and the price is better at least where I live (Thailand).

Could you compare both their 4K and 8K footages?? And in low light too..

I think the Vivo colours are better than the Samsung. As a owner of the S23 Ultra, I would not be too disappointed, since most photos can be adjusted in editing unless really blurred. Hopefully there has been updates since this video to adjust any issues. A couple of important things I did, is a case, screen and lens protection, plus I carry a lens cloth. Great comparison video.

Respected sir /mam... I m from india and I want to purchase vivo x-90 pro plus from China along with one of my friend out there... Should I go for it?? Will it support Indian 4g/5g bands? All Google Play android services? Or any thing else which can't be accessed over here in India in x-90 pro plus? Will it come with international warranty? If any software issues can I check the service center in India ??? Can I have all android updates whenever released??? Iwll it be unlocked for Indian 5g bands ????Plz guide me fully so that I can buy this x-90 pro plus from Vivo China 🙏🙏🙏

Which is the best about battery life?

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

S23 ultra

Dude this wasn't close the vivo blew out all the colors. Also the ultra is just so much more flexible

S23 ultra or the vivo x90 pro?

@MarvoloRiddle

Жыл бұрын

S23 ultra for me. Vivo is great though, especially at night. Except the front facing camera.

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

Definitely

@neilmcguinness4422

Жыл бұрын

I will gladly take one of each thank you.. Both are incredible devices, but I would be concerned about data protection on the Vivo.

@winther5

Жыл бұрын

Vivo x90 Pro Plus:)

@eclipsexoxoxox

Жыл бұрын

x90pro plus for the great camera, the s23ultra as a rounded phone with a good camera

Is the x90 Pro the global version or Chinese import? Just wondering re the smoothing of skin/hair and if that plays a part. When is the x90 Pro out in the UK?

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

Global version.

1st of all, comparison is bad, should be the + version of vivo, 2nd, i have both s23 ultra and x90 pro+ and vivo is a clear winner in 8 out of 10 scenarios and im not talking only about camera, vivo has bigger fingerprint sensor, face unlock that works flawlessly , faster charging time etc..

@xxyyxx2861

Жыл бұрын

Chinese slaves trying hard sell😅😢😂

You must be comper the vivo x90 pro plus not the pro

Vivo is better for camera use but the Funtouch os ( Global version ) is very very very bad

@deanjuno9072

Жыл бұрын

Chinese OS is Great TBH Origin OS is way up ahead than Funtouch

should actually compare to the pro+??? Samsung is mostly over sharpening anyway though. also the 1-inch will make things more burry automatically anyway, providing more depth of field because of the bigger sensor size making natural blur without using portrait mode. Portrait mode is all fake blur for any phone.

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

Unfortunately po + is not global

You should record in 4K on Samsung while it's possible, it doesn't have to be fair.. I'd also like to see how 50 mp pictures from Vivo compare to 200 mp from Samsung. Why not to match the best quaity out of them? Cheers

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

4k was recorded on both. Only 200mp and 8k wasn't compared as those are pointless comparison when one phone doesn't do it.

@Ciezarowy

Жыл бұрын

@@GadgetsBoy I ment front facing camera, you said 1080 on both because Vivo can't shoot 4K. Nvm, they are very close in terms of quality and color reproduction

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

Sorry thought you meant the main camera. I still believe it's better to keep them the same otherwise no point in comparing apples and pears

@Ciezarowy

Жыл бұрын

@@GadgetsBoy great comparison anyway :)

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

Thank you 😊

Vivo is best in Android camera right now

Vivo x90 pro the champion in low light

Vivo 🔥

Peace be upon you. Regarding the vivo x90 pro plus phone, which was announced 3 months ago, is the version now available in the UAE global? And if it is Chinese, how can I get rid of annoying Chinese ads and applications?

Bro compare it with pro plus of vivo

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

It's not global

literally, vivo paint hair in your face and head that you dont have...xDDDDDDDDDDDDD

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣

Vivo is good but software sucks. Samsung will give an overall better experience

Comparing at 1080 p instead of maxing out the 4k capability of samsung "to make things fair" is like comparing a Ferrari driving at only 10kph to a bicycle "to make things fair" in a race.

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

They were both 4k? Did you watch the video? I didn't compare 100x space zoom as it was pointless, 8K and 200mp photo.

@chea23

Жыл бұрын

Yes. I am talking about tthe front camera. Did you watched the video?

@chea23

Жыл бұрын

You can jump to 18:30 for your reference. Just to make sure you watched it correctly.

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

Lol thanks. I didn't realise you meant front cam. Still no point comparing apple and pears

@chea23

Жыл бұрын

Yeah. Especially if you don't know that you mention that in the front cam comparison. Lol! Comparing apples and pears should have not been compared in the first place if apple has to adjust to match the pear IMO. 🤣

Iphone noob...

Because the front camera of the Vivo V27 Pro already supports 4K60fps video recording, I'm sure the Vivo X series released this year will do the same! So, I hope the Vivo X series launched this year will carry the specifications below Vivo X100(?) Pro/Pro Plus BODY Build Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame SIM Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) DISPLAY Type LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) Size 6.78 inches, (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio Protection Corning Gorilla Glass Victus PLATFORM OS Android 14, Funtouch 14(Global), Origin OS 4 (China) Chipset Qualcomm SM8575 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 MEMORY Card slot No Internal 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM UFS 4.0 MAIN CAMERA Quad 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, gimbal OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, Dual-Pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 72mm (telephoto macro), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, Dual-Pixel PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/1.8-4.0, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, Dual-Pixel PDAF, OIS Features Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama Video 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960fps, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 4K60fps), gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video SELFIE CAMERA Single 12 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), Dual Pixel PDAF Features HDR Video 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS SOUND Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers 3.5mm jack No 32-bit/192kHz audio COMMS WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct Bluetooth 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD Positioning GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS NFC Yes Infrared port Yes Radio No USB USB Type-C 3.2, OTG FEATURES Sensors Fingerprint (under display, 3D Sonic Max), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum Messaging SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email, IM Browser HTML5 BATTERY Type Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable Charging 100W wired fast charging 50W wireless fast charging Vivo X110(?) Pro/Pro Plus BODY Build Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame SIM Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) DISPLAY Type LTPO5 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) Size 6.78 inches, (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio Protection Corning Gorilla Glass Victus PLATFORM OS Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), Origin OS 4 (China) Chipset Qualcomm SM8650 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 MEMORY Card slot No Internal 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM UFS 4.0 MAIN CAMERA Quad 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1.0"-type, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, gimbal OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 120mm (periscope telephoto),1/2.0", Dual-Pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 64 MP, f/1.6, 72mm (telephoto macro), 1/2.0" Dual-Pixel PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.8-4.0, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/1.55", Dual-Pixel PDAF, OIS Features Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama Video 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960fps, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 4K60fps), gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video SELFIE CAMERA Single 12 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), Dual-Pixel PDAF, OIS Features HDR Video 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS SOUND Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers 3.5mm jack No 32-bit/192kHz audio COMMS WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct Bluetooth 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD Positioning GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS NFC Yes Infrared port Yes Radio No USB USB Type-C 3.2, OTG FEATURES Sensors Fingerprint (under display, 3D Sonic Max), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum Messaging SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email, IM Browser HTML5 BATTERY Type Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable Charging 100W wired fast charging 50W wireless fast charging

Vivo is often too bright in what supposed to be dark, it looks very artificial and unnatural. Samsung oversharpened and oversaturated which can be a problem because there is no REAL raw mode in s23. Both phones are expensive to photo quality is mediocre.

bigger sensor >>> gazillion megapixels if u have a functioning brain

@GadgetsBoy

Жыл бұрын

Is that how you speak to your mum?

@marztenacity9444

Жыл бұрын

Gazillion megapixels with proper software >>>>> bigger sensor useless 😂 only a noob go for bigger sensor. Even huawei will obliterate the bigger sensors phone out there 😂

@srztf

Жыл бұрын

Its not only about the 1" sensor lol.. the software processing of the vivo here is amazing. They had been doing it since the Vivo x70 pro series with their dedicated image processing chip called V1 (for x70), V2 on their current X90 Pro. Its hardware + software perfect combination duo that made its camera brilliant