Compare news coverage from diverse sources around the world on a transparent platform driven by data. Try Ground News today and get 40% off your subscription: ground.news/broeydeschanel

@2nd3rd1st

2 ай бұрын

That's how you do a good ad-read. Make it a narrative, make it relevant to the presenter and interesting to follow. And don't make it Better Help, those despicable frauds. A+

@maliharamadhan6716

2 ай бұрын

random but what camera do you use? I love the quality and im thinking of making videos and I want my videos to look like this!!

@mikeydflyingtoaster

2 ай бұрын

@@2nd3rd1st ooh, do go on! I have always thought something seemed a little off about their ads but I guess I put it down to some of the happy customers (sorry, I misspelled ‘paid actors’. Must be more careful in future) being annoying and overly perky to this jaded toaster

@mikeydflyingtoaster

2 ай бұрын

@@satansclaw11 presumably without a ‘K’ sound at the end? Or is it like Van Gogh? A sort of guttural G/K sounding consonant?

@mikeydflyingtoaster

2 ай бұрын

@@chcowley Waugh is hell

Rich tiktokers dancing through their fancy homes suggests Fight Club levels of misunderstanding the movie.

@BE-fw1lr

2 ай бұрын

I mean, is it even a misunderstanding? The movie is hardly anti-rich considering it portrays the rich family as mostly nice and the person trying to kill them as an insane greedy incel.

@tonystonem9614

2 ай бұрын

They didn't misunderstand anything, flexing wealth and anti poor is the moral of this shallow movie 😭 I thought it'd be deep but ig it's just saying if u encounter a scholarship student make sure to lock your doors up tight, most likely a diabolical and depraved person. His gross scenes worked well tho for the shock value, every one was curious abt the movie cus of it

@tonystonem9614

2 ай бұрын

The director is a woman who grew up mad rich😭 who's father was jeweler for Elton John and madonna, she went to school with princess kate Middleton and then she went to Oxford. We can't really expect a good movie abt class consciousness from someone like that

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

@@tonystonem9614 it was a great movie, this needs to be my final comment but this video and this creator is so critical it pisses me off

@mirellatorrisi1397

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ft3vt6se3nI’m open minded even to criticism as long as well substantiated. As an Australian that loves film, it was a romp. it was meant to be fun. On reddit in particular something I noticed acutely was that Americans didn’t get it. They don’t get the sense of humour or the cinematic references, and I hate to spoil it but there are so many reference points in this film, to English cinema, not American cinema. Sometimes films are made for different markets and if you didn’t like it, that’s okay, but it inherently doesn’t make the film, shallow or ineffective.

"The implied film is better than the actual one" describes exactly how I felt about Don't worry darling

@fruzsinna04

2 ай бұрын

soo true! some movies could have been so great… if only..

@heehoopeanut420

2 ай бұрын

Ugh, yes. I did not really care for that movie at all. I really loved saltburn, tho.

@MsPatricia666

2 ай бұрын

100%

@FileCode1459

2 ай бұрын

yes that's very accurate, that was another fast-food movie

@somestrangehandle

2 ай бұрын

​@@FileCode1459 "fast food movie" is such a good description of it.

All the “shocking” stuff in Saltburn just feels juvenile. Like, just superficially gross without making me feel disturbed on any deeper level. It feels really safe

@Apostrophe4035

2 ай бұрын

That’s exactly how I felt about Poor Things

@Batchall_Accepted

2 ай бұрын

It's like something out of a Garth Ennis comic book. Just shock value for the sake of it And it feels even more pointless after he reveals it was all an act, so why do all that weird shit?

@loupiote2315

2 ай бұрын

​@@Apostrophe4035poor things wasn't gross for shock value like saltburn is, it was gross to enhance how weird and disgusting the world is from a newborn's pov

@anotherhuman3221

2 ай бұрын

It's brutalism is supposed to lure you in. Actions that are socially taboo or disgusting, but the movie fails to make those scenes coherent within the story. It feels like misplaced tonally beats. They reek of a body horror genre, but such horror can only do well if there is character to pair it up with. It brings meaning to those scenes, makes you want to watch them again and understand the emotions, even through fear or disgust. With Saltburn I only felt the urge to fast forward. Edit: spelling

@All-ze9cl

2 ай бұрын

it's disturbing and gross, but it doesn't seem that bad compared to some much more disgusting stories with deep meaning behind the disturbance.

Something that I think is also a symptom of the TikTok-ification of movies is that literally every single character has to be impossibly hot and clean. I'm kinda sick of it. No one looks like a person, everyone looks like they've been put through an instagram filter that gives them the same face. All for viral hotness. It's off-putting. Imagine someone like Philip Seymore Hoffman in Saltburn, lol. An amazingly talented character actor with a non-commercial face just seems like a thing of the past.

@tonimashdane33498

2 ай бұрын

flawed, complicated, deeply ugly characters have been rebelled against by a terminally online crowd ever since kevin spacey’s abusive behavior turned audiences off from watching american beauty and we’ve suffered because of these people.

@vision_is_augmented1213

2 ай бұрын

@@tonimashdane33498 Huh, haven't thought of it as a direct result of controversy, that's an interesting take. What's also weird is that casting beautiful people for specific roles completely makes sense. Like Don Draper. But it seems to have become an overshadowing trend to make every piece of media look like something between a La Mer commercial and an episode of Hannah Montana. Netflix is especially egregious. It's like we want everything to be smooth and agreeable and disconnected from reality now.

@purpleberry3564

2 ай бұрын

I don't think it's a TikTok problem that has been a problem in a lot of stories not wanting characters that aren't conventionally attractive characters to be important characters sometimes that can lead to problems like the storytelling being confusing because the story is telling something else but the looks of the character contradict it. Examples of that are a lot of video game women characters or the ugly high school nerds.

@haveagoodday7021

2 ай бұрын

Its especially angering when a character who's supposed to be ugly, but looks just as pretty as the rest of the cast.

@joyc.e.7511

2 ай бұрын

​@@haveagoodday7021I agree, though that's existed long since social media

I think saltburn suffered because of the director's blindness to her own privilege. She's a part of the upper upper class, and the tale of a middle class person lying about their finances to steal the wealth they covet is a nightmare of the elite, a scary story they tell each other. She can't reflect deeply on class, homoeroticism, or race because she doesn't want to lose her access to her privileges, and so her film is just as shallow.

@tonimashdane33498

2 ай бұрын

This is why Bong Joon-ho makes the best "eat the rich" movies.

@shirley444

2 ай бұрын

Agreed. This is the same woman who is close to the delevingnes and went to public school (public schools in the uk are high fee paying private schools) who also won an academy award for her first film. The upper class can’t write about the middle or working classes because they never once seen them as equals

@mvximillivn

2 ай бұрын

i wouldnt even call Barry Keoghan's character middle class, rather lower upper class. personally i think theres nothing really to discuss about saltburn. imo its just a fun, goofy lil movie that has nothing to say. however a conflict about lower vs upper upper class (with the middle and lower classes being completely absent) makes it slightly more interesting

@jwt-nu3ei

2 ай бұрын

​ @mvximillivn His character is middle class. Upper class in the UK = the peerage, gentry and hereditary landowners (worth a read - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class_in_the_United_Kingdom#Upper_class). In fact, reading her bio, Emerald Fennell herself is upper middle class.

@ultralord8919

2 ай бұрын

@@tonimashdane33498 Such as Parasite where the rich family literally does nothing wrong and the rich father gets murdered out of the poor father's own insecurity.

IMO Saltburn is not an Eat the Rich movie - it's a Fear the Poor (and the middle class) movie. It's not a movie About the rich For the middle class - it's a movie For the rich About the middle class. That's why, in this movie, the wealthy aren't horrible (and their horribleness is their naivete born from privilege), whereas the inflator is horrible for no apparent reason - the reason isn't necessary because the poor and middle class are always a threat to the rich regardless of their reasons for being so. It's a cautionary tale to the wealthy to distrust the middle class. But with enough familiar references and aesthetics as window dressing to confirm the middle classes assumption that they are the target audience (since they are in almost every case of popular cinema). Understanding that Fenell hails from the wealthy elite class makes it clear that she is writing about what she knows. So from the lens of Fear the Poor the entire movie makes so much sense.

@1000huzzahs

2 ай бұрын

Damn. You nailed it.

@Laura-gd4ku

2 ай бұрын

I think its simply not a political movie at all.

@kostajovanovic3711

2 ай бұрын

@@Laura-gd4ku and that would be false, no matter the movie

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

@@kostajovanovic3711 oh for gods sake, many people and movies are apolitical. Being apolitical is not a “privilege” either it’s literally a choice. I’m a gay man and I’m probably center but I don’t pay that much attention because it’s boring to me lowkey lol. I do love Obama and am sick of people calling him and George bush war criminals, like get over yourself. A few other republicans I love are Jared Kushners and Ivanka Trump, they seem lovely and Ann Coulter who was HILARIOUS at the Rob lowe roast and the roasts about her were so ctuel and personal, it was appalling like they actually didn’t like her and thought she was a bad person My parents voted for Trump and some of you think we should cut them out of our lives, enough already

@Maggie-vt8wp

2 ай бұрын

u act as if emerald’s family comes from the same league of landed gentry as the characters of the movie. i’m sorry if u think that the rich people are somehow sympathetic or meant to appeal to the audience. the film is a story about the corrupting capacity of power and wealth. oliver for all intents and purposes would’ve become a normal person if he wasn’t so fixated on this type of wealth that you can’t naturally gain. the cattons are cold and callous and utterly uncaring of any of his real or fake experiences. in the end, he’s as soulless as the rest of them and it isn’t a cautionary tale to the elite, it’s a cautionary tale about the cyclical tale of corruption that is so intertwined with power

My friends and I did Saltburn then The Talented Mr. Ripley as a double feature and while I finished Saltburn going "okay that was an okay movie, that made me laugh, the visuals are good, I'd say it's fun" after I watched the masterclass that is Ripley, I realized how poorly constructed Saltburn actually is. I love this deep dive of a video and you've made me appreciate Talented Mr Ripley even more!! This video has inspired so many ideas for my own screenwriting project too, so thank you!

@ldeen7897

Ай бұрын

I want to be friends with you. Also going to do this suggestion because I don’t want to watch Saltburn but having something to directly compare is going to make it better

@ModernPict

Ай бұрын

Ripley will always been in my top 5

@kalisworl

Ай бұрын

Its incredibly unfortunate she made basically a worse copy of the same story

@sleepyssyd

Ай бұрын

i did the same thing and felt the same way lol

@henryofskalitz5212

Ай бұрын

I really didn't feel anything for Mr Ripley, Actually, I felt so little, I had forgotten I had watched it at all and had to re-watch it after Saltburn and seeing people compare them, and even now I still say Saltburn is the better of the 2.

On a shallower note, watching old movies makes me miss their lighting. Sometimes things that look good are fully visible...

"the implied film is better than the actual one" GIRL I PASSED OUT

@thehumanwiII

2 ай бұрын

Yeah this is pretty damn spot on, I liked how the film was *made but still lacked a lot and didn’t really accomplish much.

@henotic.essence

2 ай бұрын

The ads sold it, the movie made us feel ripped off 😂

@arthurb6882

2 ай бұрын

why did you pass out

@OsloTime

2 ай бұрын

Hahaha. She told no lies!😂

@wildmarjoramdieselpunk6396

2 ай бұрын

Agreed.

“… which films are good and which films LOOK good.” Bam. You nailed it.

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

Same fucking thing, it served its purpose and movies are subjective

@Sing_A_Rebel_Song

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ft3vt6se3ndude get a life. You’re replying to literally every single comment here. It’s pathetic

@MsLazykat

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ft3vt6se3nThe purpose of a film is to tell a story. If that story is told poorly, it did not serve its purpose. And chill, it seems like you can't handle a differing opinion. Movies ARE subjective, so separating a film that "is" good from a film that "looks" good is perfectly within someone's right.

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

@@MsLazykatnot at all, you chill. It’s the same thing and it’s a damn good movie and told a great story

@shortyrags

2 ай бұрын

Funny that Poor Things gets so much love when I believe it essentially commits the same cardinal sin to a much worse extent.

for a erotic thriller saltburn has zero rizz

@Winter-Alpha-Omega

Ай бұрын

For real! I was waiting to feel conflicted or like I was there, sexy and attracted to Jacob Elordie. The film has 0 rizz, indeed. It's so muted and eh.

I’m curious if the class differences between Minghella and Fennell also influence why Minghella was more interested in dissecting class dynamics. Fennell comes from high society herself- her 18th birthday was even documented by Tatler. I personally feel like she was never really willing to make the Cattons truly contemptible or dissect class dynamics because it would mean dissecting her own privilege, and frankly nepotism, in an unflattering way. She fell back on “it’s not a commentary, it’s a love story,” to further distance herself from dissecting her own privilege and class. Saltburn also lends an interesting perspective of how the upper classes view the lower classes, rather than the other way around. You get the impression, through Fennell, that the upper classes believe that society’s issue with them is solely due to their lifestyle being coveted, rather than issues of inequity. Not saying it isn’t coveted, but that the upper classes want to believe that’s the only true complaint and desire, when it’s not. It’s like Fennell was told this her entire life and she made a film based off of an upper class assumption.

@user-hz6fj9xy4y

2 ай бұрын

> I personally feel like she was never really willing to make the Cattons truly contemptible or dissect class dynamics because it would mean dissecting her own privilege, and frankly nepotism, in an unflattering way. That's just silly though. There are decent rich people and there are rich people who are complete pyschopaths. How they are portrayed in one movie isn't going to change the world.

@Y-E-R-I

2 ай бұрын

​@@user-hz6fj9xy4y im sorry but the ultra rich are 100% bad and on purpose. no one can be a billionaire and be a good person at the same time

@wormie1312

Ай бұрын

@@user-hz6fj9xy4yno one said it’d change the world, just that in order to write critically about class dynamics, she would have to analyze her own position within those class dynamics. otherwise, it would fall flat on that axis, which it did.

@shane_rm1025

Ай бұрын

​@@wormie1312Perhaps she did just that, but within her own worldview.

@shane_rm1025

Ай бұрын

What is the difference between the rich's lifestyle being coveted, and inequity? Unless you're saying its not that the poor want to live like the rich, but that they want the rich to live like the poor?

To be fair, the joke about southern English people not knowing where Liverpool is, is actually a common joke in British comedy circles. Catherine Tate was making that joke 15 years ago.

@jalapenofarts

2 ай бұрын

So, it's just another unoriginal thing Fenell did.

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

@@jalapenofarts Emerald is a fucking GENIUS and brilliant and lovely and is very original

@RSB1949

2 ай бұрын

Honestly had no idea.

@comparethequeercat

2 ай бұрын

@@jalapenofarts No, it's just a representation, albeit somewhat exaggerated, of the geographical/class divide within the UK.

@leonardsl6667

2 ай бұрын

There's actually a variant of that joke in the Bible: "And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?" John 1:46 Shakespeare gives us another variant: Casca: "Those that understood him smiled at one another and shook their heads; but, for mine own part, it was Greek to me." Julius Caesar, Act 1, Scene 2

I don’t think I would have minded Saltburn as a fun thriller so much if it didn’t constantly seem like it was trying to say something. They put so much almost commentary into it that it tricked people into thinking it had more depth than it did.

@jw-ob1wv

2 ай бұрын

I pointed out to my friends that the first half Saltburn was clearly trying to introduce themes of desire, class, and a good old fashioned English stately-home mystery, but then proceeded to give up all this in the second half. All they could say in response was "your expectations were wrong going into it, it's just a fun thriller". Soo annoying how Saltburn fans refuse to see how shallow it is

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

@@jw-ob1wv it’s not shallow in the slightest and your tone is condescending and like it’s an “objectively shallow movie” it’s fine to not like it but stop acting like movies aren’t subjective.

@Emelia39

2 ай бұрын

I was actually kind of relieved it wasn’t a class commentary type movie (not that I’m against that, it’s just there were several movies the year before with the exact same type of approach) and liked the SPOILER Twist that he wasn’t actually poor but after that it felt like they didn’t know what to do with the movie at all. I’ve seen a lot of interpretations of it and frankly I find them to be a bit grasping at straws in terms of the plot’s coherence. There were themes, sure but part of media literacy is critiquing whether a film achieved its commentary, not just that it felt like there was commentary there. The Idol was supposedly about sexual liberation but I’d say most people would say it failed miserably on that mark.

@mrdad-zl9zl

2 ай бұрын

And then when none of it added up or made sense came back in with the lol its just a silly trashy thriller it's not that deep lol! What? Then why did they take the time to include so much symbolism? The problem is it didn't go anywhere meaningful or connect back in a way that's satisfying. Its just there

@Sing_A_Rebel_Song

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ft3vt6se3nyou are part of the group they were talking about.

This movie came off to me like the director watched talented Mr ripley and was horrified/ sympathized with Jude laws character and said, “I need to correct this”

I think the biggest reason they wrote the film to take place in 2006/07ish was due to the pre-emergence of the social media era where it wasn't a given that everyone had facebook, myspace, etc. It would've made Oliver's background history a lot harder to track and a lot easier for someone to just take him at his word, especially since his surface level demeanor is diminutive and honest. I actually found that filmmaking decision pretty clever. I honestly thought Saltburn was fun; but I agree with a lot of your criticisms and was wishing for more of Oliver's backstory.

I actually think Saltburn is a movie for the masses disguised as something more ‘alternative’. Even the ‘disturbing’ scenes that caused it to go so viral are not particularly shocking for anyone who has seen any film out of the mainstream. Not to mention the plot is predictable and simple and the foreshadowing is glaringly obvious. The fact that everyone and their mother has seen it is also testament to that. It’s got the bones of an ambitious indie film that’s then been watered down and chopped up into bite size pieces so that the viewer will feel smarter without doing any work. An ambiguous ending might’ve saved it a little but it was so cut and dried that there wasn’t anything left to ponder.

@Larsvontreebar

2 ай бұрын

yup you solved it, way to go.

@user-we8dn5ub9z

2 ай бұрын

@tinker_belle41 I agree to an extent. I don’t think they were particularly meant to be that shocking in terms of them being the most “disgusting” and “gross” thing ever but that’s how people took it, and she had to know they have the added value of being shocking. However, while sexy, they are also supposed to be confronting/daring and raw and graphic and Emerald definitely knew that when including them. I would argue the whole film is built on shock factor, if not the graphic imagery, then the plot twists. Emerald even said herself the idea was built around the idea of someone licking a plughole. And that’s kinda the problem with it because it doesn’t go beyond the plughole so to say. It’s a beautiful, haunting image but it can’t carry a whole film and she must’ve known that because she added in a whole other component about class and wealth and greed, and thats where it becomes messy and loses its message in my opinion.

@user-dj7zs2ng3c

2 ай бұрын

Could be a gateway for all the people experiencing the "shocking" movie to watch more unconventional and actually disturbing movies. Since mainstream popular movies right now are generally especially terrible I take comfort in this even if it's only slightly outside mainstream.

@samuelsmith5400

2 ай бұрын

“Indie film” has become a genre in the since that a movie with massive budget can copy an old book or film beat for beat and they can just apply “alternative cinematography” to make it look more indie and “aesthetic” it’s pretentious for the sake of, it’s the same as an adult cartoon being crude for the sake of “adult”

@WheresMyInhaler

2 ай бұрын

Iv never heard of this movie untill now

My hot take on Saltburn is that it would have been much better if it ended after he f*cks the grave. The last act retcons the first two somewhat; it plays much more as a story about obsessive love than as this ‘infiltration’ narrative.

@coralflorist

2 ай бұрын

I agree. It makes the scene where he drinks the bathwater and fucks the grave as played just for shock value. If his whole plan was to get all their money and he wasn't actually obsessed with Felix, why do all of that then, like, what was the point?

@d.f.4830

2 ай бұрын

@@coralflorist Exactly!

@VictoriaClerici

2 ай бұрын

​@@coralflorist he was obsessed with Felix. When he realised he could never get him, he decided to take his place out of this sick want him/want to be him mindset. That's what I interpreted at least

@pfblack

2 ай бұрын

you're thinking too hard. consider bill hicks' take on basic instinct

@Scynthor

2 ай бұрын

This is solidified to me because I thought Keoghan did a fantastic job, All the way up until the 'revelation' scene. He's incredible at playing naturalistically, feeling like you're watching a real person who's not on camera- so monologuing exposition as an 'arch' villain I didn't feel was playing to his strength. Movie looked good tho!

One take I saw from someone was that the “shocking” scenes for which the viewer is meant to feel disgusted - I.e., bathtub,, grave, “vampire” hook up - should be juxtaposed against the scenes in which we feel “social disgust” for Oliver - ordering his eggs over easy only to send them right back bc runny yolks hurt his tummy, no one remembering his name while singing happy birthday, the awkward as hell karaoke song.

@ilovebooks49

19 күн бұрын

why?

I get the comparison on a surface level but ultimately I just feel like these are two different films in tone and intent. I think the fact that the fam in saltburn isn't "evil" and is just vapid is part of the point. Flelix being normal is part of the point. Because it's still a commentary on the desire of money and class that exists, and I feel it actually works better when the rich people are functionally neutral. Saltburn for as much as it does on the surface have in common with Ripley is telling a completely different story.

@Chinky111987

Ай бұрын

Agreed

I think the main issue with Saltburn is that Oliver isn't tragic; you never feel his regret or conflict. He seems SUPER satisfied, if annoyed he had to kill people to get it. Tom is still empty and hollow at the end, realizing that nothing he achieved could have made up for how he got it, Oliver is just annoyed that he had to go through so much work to get his house; he is not trying to fit in, he is trying to increase his own status, for himself, rather than others. It's really weird; like the moral of the story really is the "middle class wants the bag" and literally nothing else

@VerasAmbience

2 ай бұрын

If thats what you took from the movie then youre stupid. It’s a story about desire and obsession

@HitchcockBrunette

2 ай бұрын

Why do you have to feel his empathy? He wanted something, driven by desire… and he got it.

@normalguy246

2 ай бұрын

i think your mistake is in insisting that oliver must represent a larger societal group, or that this story has to be saying something about class, when i honestly dont think the director was thinking too hard about that. this is a work of almost fantastical fiction, and sometimes films are intended to be viewed as just that. i think the film is definitely saying something, but that "something" can be interpreted in many ways, which i actually like a lot more than if this film had tried making a singular, heavy-handed statement about #society or whatever

@luistijerina

2 ай бұрын

Oliver is a monster. He’s the consequence of the aspirational culture the upper class keep disseminating and promoting. It’s like a fable, where an action has extreme consequences. The best comparison would be Asami in Audition. She’s an hyperbolic consequence of misogynistic culture. She just happens to be a psychopath and the protagonist let her into his life due to his unrealistic expectations of women. Something similar happens in Saltburn. The premise of Saltburn is solid. The execution, not so much. It’s a little too sympathetic to the rich that it almost sounds like a cautionary tale. To be wary of the lower classes.

@charleneking7262

2 ай бұрын

The difference is this is a satire. It is intentional that there is no real way to feel at the end. Oliver is completely ambiguous. It goes back to Farleigh's the "creepy little doll factory they make Olivers in." Where you are left not knowing what to feel. The anti-hero of Oliver is ultimately that he is a protagonist AND antagonist, for no other reason than that he 'won', or did he? feeling. And then you're left empty, stunned, confused. Practically every frame and dialogue of this is a clue or a reference that this is nothing that it seems. Suspenseful almost sinister music in odd places. Oliver's mostly clumsy, lucky cleverness....

when i saw saltburn my first thought was it must’ve been manufactured in a lab for tumblr gifs & web-weaved collages…. beyond the aesthetics saltburn is so empty.

@stasiaramirez2755

2 ай бұрын

facts

@strangersbyethelcain

2 ай бұрын

same 😭 i gave up at 40mins it felt so empty. read the spoilers and it didn't change my mind

@Catfood430

2 ай бұрын

That doesn't mean people can't enjoy it for what it is. I wasn't exactly a fan of this film either after watching it, but there's something oddly nice about the 'experience' of Saltburn. Maybe it's just the simplicity, the escapism it offers. I think the problem here is that it got the aesthetics of an A24 film, and suddenly everyone's expecting it to be this deep, philosophical masterpiece. Can't we just enjoy a visually pleasing, maybe mindless flick sometimes? It's funny how aesthetics can mess with expectations. It's like people expected a revelation just because it looks pretty. Yes, Saltburn might be lacking in substance. But maybe we all need a reminder that not every movie has to have life-altering storytelling. Sometimes, the general 'feel' of a movie can still be meaningful if it hits you at the right moment in life. Like a melancholic song. Or even Tumblr gifs.

@briannarose2439

2 ай бұрын

⁠@@Catfood430 A film doesn’t have to have “life altering” storytelling BUT this kind of film that emerald fennel was trying to create should have some form of substance. The pretty looking aesthetics actually make the lack of substance stand out more and make the experience of watching the film more frustrating in my opinion. It’s empty calories. When looking at tumblr gifs I have a completely different set of expectations than going into a film with the hype being so high and everyone saying how it’s such a thought provoking movie with deep themes…

@MrSandman_0981

2 ай бұрын

So you're implying that tumblr girls are stupid?

thank you for articulating why I had such a tough time enjoying this movie. Oliver isn't a person, he's obviously "sociopathic" from the beginning, and the twists undermine anything interesting the movie might have said. The final twist - that he planned it from the start, means that even the location doesn't matter. It doesn't get to have a "getting lost in the world of the rich" vibe, because its not there, oliver's never intoxicated or allured, he's entirely driven from the beginning because he's just a cipher for thriller villainy. He has no motivations beyond "what's the most fucked up way I can maximise my power in this moment" - which leads to dull reveals and moments which just leave you saying "why"?

@henryofskalitz5212

Ай бұрын

He didn't plan it from the start, our narrator is a compulsive liar. We discover this in the movie. Why now are we believing his final monologue that he planned it?

@danielklein5829

Ай бұрын

@@henryofskalitz5212 the movie doesn't use surrealism at all, the stuff we see at the end is known to happen. If we can't believe anything we see then its entirely pointless anyway nothing in the movie matters. That's not a defence of the movie its just quite damning that its best defence is "nothing fucking matters"

@henryofskalitz5212

Ай бұрын

@@danielklein5829 How does the main character being a lier suddenly equate to nothing mattering?

@danielklein5829

Ай бұрын

@@henryofskalitz5212 you're using it to say that we can't trust any of the images on screen, which means nothing matters. Its facile to defend the film by saying we can't trust anything that happens in it

@MegamanStarforce2010

Ай бұрын

it's definitely not planned, there's so many points where he's plainly uncomfortable and making things up on the spot. he first flattens his tire because he wants an excuse to talk to him and spend time with a dude he clearly likes. every following action he takes is also things done in the moment and not in service of some higher plan. the end twist isn't even really a twist, it just confirms what you already know about each scene. that he's a sociopath with no morals that's been trying to get what he wants at every turn. initially the man he loved, and over time the power he craved. there's no "this was the plan all along" to be found here and any implication of that is just oliver's ego-trip and justifying himself after losing the love of his life to nothing but himself.

Thank you so much for this brilliant video essay, it's amazing to see my uncle's work explored so thoroughly. Just wanted to let you know that Anthony was from the Isle of Wight, not the Isle of Man! It's a similar small coastal place though, and you're right about his other background information. Thanks again!

@ninipanini11

Ай бұрын

Amazing that you commented!! Are you also in the film business?

@picahudsoniaunflocked5426

7 күн бұрын

Minghella died too young. I really appreciate the television work he did with Jim Henson in Henson's later stuff. I vividly remember Juliet Stevenson in one. His work on The Storyteller is among my favourite works ever put to screen. May your uncle rest well.

@luizaminghella6785

7 күн бұрын

@@picahudsoniaunflocked5426 The Storyteller is absolutely a top notch project and I wish more people knew about it! Thank you X

As someone who adores The Talented Mr. Ripley i really appreciate how you broke down all the things that film does brilliantly and what Saltburn fails to do. It's a film that thrives so much on shock value and flashy aesthetics without adding anything of substance in the writing.

It's funny how Minghella wasn't afraid of depicting the rich as terrible people but Fennell, consciously or not, couldn't. Then people say the directors class plays no part in it 😅

@JunLo-tu1sz

2 ай бұрын

on the one hand i understand where you'r coming from. on the other hand, by ur measure, Parasite isn't a good class critique. and i think the danger of painting the rich as all terrible brings up a different problem. It implies the issue of class is that terrible ppl get rich, and not the system and culture that makes ppl so harmfully rich. Rich ppl are normal, diverse, and complex like you or me. And we should still eat them.

@BE-fw1lr

2 ай бұрын

@@JunLo-tu1sz No? Regardless of his current circumstances, Bong Joon Ho grew up working class.

@grmgt

2 ай бұрын

@@JunLo-tu1sz Oh, ofc individual rich people can be good or bad just as anyone else. It is the b#urg3oisie as a class that needs to be eliminat3d. But I'm talking specifically about Saltburn, where Fennell fails to actually make the rich family look bad, she just says she is doing it, but it shows a more empathetic picture of them all the while d3m0nizing a middle class person lol (making Oliver look like a random leech and not a complex character like Tom in Mr. Ripley). So i agree with your last paragraphs, it's not a moral choice, but Fennell puts in those terms and fails to deliver, that's what im commenting on. PS: Censored some words that i think are the ones making the all mighty algorithm delete my reply (which i had made more than 30 minutes ago).

@JunLo-tu1sz

2 ай бұрын

@@BE-fw1lr Oh no no I was referring to the fact that the film portrays the upper-class as "nice" while the poor are ruthless crabs-in-a-bucket, and that despite on the surface portraying the rich more favorably, the nuance actually improves its critique of the bourgeois class.

@JunLo-tu1sz

2 ай бұрын

@@grmgt Ah I see what you mean! Yeah, the film clearly fails to meet the 'scathing eat-the-rich critique' label that the movie has endlessly marketed itself with.

I don't know I think that this is a misinterpretation of the film. I think the point was that it wasn't all planned, the original plan was just to get Felix to like him, and once that spiraled out of control, it became a rich-eating murder plot.

This was brilliant, so glad the algorithm brought me here! 🙂 (Also, that Schwartzbaum line about Damon is just [chef's kiss])

“Ghost of a better movie” is suchhhhh a good way to describe this film

@stephenhawkins9476

2 ай бұрын

I'm stealing that phrase!! 🤣🤣

@user-xf4hn1cc2p

2 ай бұрын

@@stephenhawkins9476 kkkkk me too

@unhhgcrxexhjvuvujchcrzwzwz7956

2 ай бұрын

God I swear there’s a lot of these “ghost” films lately

@McDonaldsCalifornia

2 ай бұрын

Spoooky

@all-caps3927

Ай бұрын

So is it worth watching the talented mr Ripley then?

The fact that the concept of the entire movie began with the idea of slurping bath water tells you pretty much everything you need to know about the movie.

@anotherhuman3221

2 ай бұрын

Yes and no, this visual evokes strong feelings, but in more body horror style than this watered down thriller. Sometimes great ideas come from one strong image/ feeling but unfortunately not in this case

@Arthur-nr5ci

2 ай бұрын

@@anotherhuman3221 While true. The way I'm interpreting it is that she had a notion that would be shocking to film, and everything else that followed was devoted entirely to that theme.

@_noctivagus_

2 ай бұрын

Belle Delphine 😍

Nothing better than finding a new channel you whole heartedly enjoy and repeatedly agree with. Feel like part meerkat, part bobbing dog. This video has articulated and itched a scratch I’ve had since watching Saltburn. This shamefully includes never watching TTMR…. Yes I know, it’s top of the watchlist now. Love from Manchester, UK!

Saltburn isn’t about the middle class wanting more. Some characters that are villains simply are just villains just because. The scene with Oliver and Venetia when she’s in the tub reveals this perfectly and lays it all out to the audience. She compared him to a moth just wanting to consume. Oliver is obsessive and lustful, he just wants to consume his very desires. Keywords: obsession & consume. That is the reason. That’s the “why”. He saw what he wanted (Felix & Saltburn) and took it. Everyone else dying and leaving Salburn was simply a means to the end while Oliver had fun doing it. The only thing Oliver felt bad about was getting caught. There is otherwise no remorse or shred of shame. This is very well done if you ask me, everyone is used to the villain always needing a deep reason, needing to do what they do so the audience can sympathize or make sense of it but the truth is some villains are simply just evil and have no redeeming qualities.

It's important to know that Farleigh did NOT try to steal their stuff, in the revelation scene it shows that after Oliver sleeps with him, he uses Farleigh's phone to contact Sotheby's, thus framing him. Farleigh was innocent.

@AnikoMikes

2 ай бұрын

People MISSED that???

@erikadlloyd5586

2 ай бұрын

Justice for Farleigh

@almostawesomeali

2 ай бұрын

for me, Oliver being able to "seduce" Farleigh (what reads on film as assault but I sincerely doubt Fennell meant it that way) was so egregious, he was distrusting of Oliver from the start! WHY would he fall for his attempts to seduce him! it makes no sense, justice for Farleigh.

@fatterperdurabo42069

2 ай бұрын

​@@tinker_belle41realizing that someone is trying to scam and deceive your friend isn't being possessive over your friend's wealth

@Eyecyou64

2 ай бұрын

Sometimes gay people have sex with each other even if they don't like each other ​@@almostawesomeali

See when I watched Saltburn I took it as comedy/parody of a movie like Ripley. I thought the emptiness and shallowness was on purpose. I laughed at scene of the family sitting at the dinner table grieving over Felix and trying to eat breakfast. That seemed so ridiculous! The movie was ridiculous! Especially with the over the top ending where everything was revealed in a mustache twirling montage. But after seeing interviews with Fennel, I am no longer convinced it was intentional. Or even a comedy. Fennel was trying to make a movie with more depth without recognizing that her material came from the shallow end of a kiddie pool. Edit: seems like there is still some debate from the comments if the dark comedy elements of the movie were intentional or not. Either way, it is a ridiculous movie whether intentional or not.

@kathleneoloughlin

2 ай бұрын

it's just Ripley if he won in the long run, which was a thing I didn't know that I wanted apparently

@ShinoTheTank

2 ай бұрын

I actually think you’re right, I was laughing at a lot of the scenes due to the ridiculousness of it all.

@mynameis9683

2 ай бұрын

yeah i was absolutely confident that it is meant to be funny

@xHal1

2 ай бұрын

Well, it was supposed to be a dark comedy, over the top, and absurd.

@joyc.e.7511

2 ай бұрын

Was it really not meant to be funny? That's quite sad, then.

You inspired me to watch Mister Ripley for the first time- that rowboat scene is going to live rent free in my head forever- first film I've watched in a while that really felt substantial, thank you for this!

I think Saltburn is effective on something that it wasn't set to be: Depicting a selfish useless person, that is well aware he isn't going to be someone by talent or uniqueness. Just as the music video of Murder On the Dancefloor, the dancer knows she is by far the less talented, and therefore she will only win by eliminating her competitors. The director is crazy if she actually thinks he is relatable just by the fact that we all know the feeling of desiring to ascend to someone's class and privileges, that's as far as it goes, at least for me. I did enjoy the movie, but after sitting on it for a few days, i now think i enjoyed the beauty of some scenes, that to me looked like paintings, and the royal like color palette.

Wow you hid a seminal Talented Mr. Ripley video essay in this one about Saltburn. Well done, Brooey.

@Emi-rr6ph

2 ай бұрын

What's seminal about it?

@davidgoeller5843

Ай бұрын

@@Emi-rr6ph Yeah I agree with the take but that's a weird adjective to use

Anyone else feel like Jacob Elordi’s attractiveness kind of carries the fanbase’s interest in the movie?

@caleidozkopie8344

2 ай бұрын

Yes lol

@tonimashdane33498

2 ай бұрын

lol they have the mindset and critical capacity of me as a teenager hahahaha

@hlmitchel

2 ай бұрын

Anyone else feel that your superficial obsession with what you think is "attractive" is why part of the reason why this entire trash of a movie appeals to the new social media class?

@caleidozkopie8344

2 ай бұрын

@@hlmitchel go take a chill pill my dude

@DepthUnchecked

2 ай бұрын

@@hlmitchel Fuck off, the guy is clearly physically attractive

Good work, & well done for partnering with Ground News - difficult to get objective news currently

ive been listening to the podcast for around a year and had no idea there was a youtube channel- i finally have a reason to use the app more again

euphoria and saltburn are like the split screen videos that have soap cutting or subway surfers gameplay beside a story that’s not interesting on its own to keep one’s attention

@Kaelllinn

2 ай бұрын

I was just going to make that Euphoria comparison.......Literally eggs in the same basket.

@briannarose2439

2 ай бұрын

I would argue at least season 1 on Euphoria had some story substance to it. Particularly with Rue’s character.

@mrdad-zl9zl

2 ай бұрын

​​@@Kaelllinn yes, and unfortunately they both have the teen and tween market locked in loaded to argue with *everyone* who's critical

@Tea_Noire

2 ай бұрын

Euphoria doesn't try to pretend it's a deep commentary on society or anything tho, it knows its a silly teen drama and goes all the way with it. Saltburn is just pretentious and tryhard.

@mollusckscramp4124

2 ай бұрын

I'm lost- why would soapcutting of all things _increase_ anyone's attention span? 😂

Why did they shoot the party scene like a Netflix mini series

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

It was brilliant

@CHESSZILLA

2 ай бұрын

it was dog shit, such good cinematography in this film, there were moments where barry was flooded with blue liight which was a motif of the film, and im sure they are trying to cover up for the fact they cant afford to throw a billionaires party, but it looks taccy and it felt likeso many other party scenes ive seen in shit films. it felt like the fall of the house of usher which was a shit tv series, phoney television shiteness. the cheap lasers and discos lights were bad and they should have stuck with blue lighting, more reserved rather than tacky. the film felt like it was made for tv and then edited into a film like a lot of these semi small budget breakaway successes do feel like. because they score high with test audiences before marketing even gets a hold and they are given the much more risky and expesnive chance to go to cinema. the story remained good but the party scene let them down and lets not forget talented mr ripley was a complicated and brilliant film and this is dance music and the little shit getting away with it conseuence free, hardly exploring the larger themes at play in the stories it borrows from. watered down gen x propoganda shit. one of the best films of the year, thats not saying much. infinity pool was great@@user-ft3vt6se3n

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

@@CHESSZILLA this was a brilliant movie by a sensational director

@nicholasmaniccia1005

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ft3vt6se3n "Nuh uh," is not an opinion, liking it regardless of flaws is...

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

@@nicholasmaniccia1005 absolutely not, you can dispute “flaws” it’s not “objective quality”

I think another thing which people miss all the time is the fact that Oliver (saltburn) desecrates Felix grave not out of love but out of powerlessness. He's spent the whole movie totally dominating and manipulating every character with the exception of Felix who vehemently rejects him upon learning he lied. Felix was the only character Oliver had no control over so he 'rapes' the grave as his final and fruitless attempt at control..

Thank you for a fantastic incisive review - and thank you for calling out the shenanigans. I love your line as well that (some) viewers have lost the ability to distinguish between films that “look good vs films that *are* good” (I am paraphrasing but your comment is beautiful)

The tone was all over the place and full of pastiches. It baffled me too when she said The Talented Mr Ripley wasn't a ref. I could also see influences of The Shining and The Killing of a Sacred Deer. Saltburn analogous to the Overlook Hotel, and the miniature maze model foreshadowing them falling victim to Oliver in this case as Fennell mentioned vampires...? Perhaps it might have worked if it was straight up horror. Even magical realism. I think she was more focused on style and wanting to subvert expectations than crafting a coherent story.

@fayexibe

2 ай бұрын

oh yes it's like the shining with the person (oliver) taking over the place (saltburn). there needs no reason for why he is a psychopath but the reveal of how everyone dies is anticlimatic. and unbelievable - almost like he have strange powers like in sacred deer the satire and humor would still work even but it's just conflicting here

@L.p.e.

2 ай бұрын

@@fayexibe Yup I found the reveal unnecessary. Even as a satire, the ending did not feel earned. It felt like what she intended did not translate for many as what they perceived, like this video pointed out - the implied film vs the actual film. Like Fennell's previous film, she liked a clean ending. For this one, the last act really didn't work for me. If she had set it up well and left it up to the audience to make their own conclusions...

@vaibh4vi

2 ай бұрын

not seeing the talented mr ripley as inspiration is crazy bc i remember watching the talented mr ripley right after saltburn and there being similarities in the dialogue, up to line by line similarity!

@L.p.e.

2 ай бұрын

@@vaibh4vi Right? I really thought she was doing a satire or even parody of TTMR. She just said nope and people are just bad, period. ?? He's a vampire. He's smart. They're dumb. ??

@mummyjohn

2 ай бұрын

nothing wrong with being more focused on style and wanting to subvert expectations than crafting a coherent story, for the record.

I LOVE a media analysis of The Talented Mr. Ripley in the year of our Lord 2024. I truly was never the same after watching that movie.

@ChangedMyNameFinally69

2 ай бұрын

Better than the books from what I'm seeing, seems like Highsmith actually identified with Ripley and agreed with his actions, if her self-loathing and Antisemitism is any indication

@Missjunebugfreak

2 ай бұрын

Same! I watched that film 6 years ago for the first time and that ending stayed with me for months. It's such a great film.

I would argue that Minghella actually leans MORE into the gay serial killer stereotype than Highsmith (even though it is unintentional). By drawing Tom's sexuality out of ambiguity and depicting him as a furious, scorned homosexual who kills a man because he doesn't reciprocate his feelings, he turns Tom from a callous, materialistic psychopath, as he is in the book, to a raging gay incel. Class is at the forefront of the Ripley book, while sexuality is at the forefront of the film. This creates a stronger association between Ripley's sexuality and psychopathy. Book Ripley is a critique of the American Dream pushed to its extreme, a novel far more similar to the film Parasite than Minghella's adaptation. It poses a warning about unchecked ambition and materialism. Tom never sees Dickie as a person, because to him, a person is a sum of their parts (nice shoes, nice watch, nice clothes), so by keeping those and wearing them, he never mourns Dickie, as Dickie still exists in his mind. Book Tom is the personification of America - puritanical and judgemental when it comes to sex, callous and desensitized when it comes to violence. “Tom laughed at that phrase 'sexual deviation'. Where was the sex? Where was the deviation?” Meanwhile, in the context of the scene, he's just bludgeoned a man to death.... Tom, I think we can see where the deviation is. And I've always seen him as more likely asexual than homosexual. He doesn't belong anywhere - not in their heteronormative society, nor even in the queer community that he'd left behind in New York. Marge writes, “All right, he may not be queer. He's just a nothing, which is worse. He isn't normal enough to have any kind of sex life, if you know what I mean.” Tom has no identity, not even as a gay man. Nowhere that he truly belongs.

My favorite new descriptor of something that you could enjoy but we won’t be talking about in ten years time: it’s a fun romp.

living in London, I feel like I've met hundreds of Emerald Fennells. Nepo babies with a basic knowledge of an artwork, using that art form to comment on a class system they have only ever benefited from. Not anymore talented than anyone else, but just richer and with daddy's producer friend to help.

@jwt-nu3ei

2 ай бұрын

I'm convinced it's a Public school thing. I grew up in privileged circles in the Home Counties, but I went to a Grammar School. When I got to university the difference between the Public school kids and the rest (even just 'mere' private school types) was notable. They have a completely unreasonable degree of self-assurance about them. It's often innocuous, but I think it's actually pretty potent because it often manifests in simply having no inhibition. I used to think they lacked self-awareness, but in reality I think they just don't give a fuck.

@user-ft3vt6se3n

2 ай бұрын

Oh please she made it on her own and she is a genius 🙄. Get over yourself

@nutsack

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ft3vt6se3n?

@kaeg.7800

2 ай бұрын

​@@user-ft3vt6se3n Emerald Fennell, is that you?

@GT-wo2oj

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ft3vt6se3n the daughter of a Eton educated multimillionaire jewellery designer and an author, who were friends with Dukes and Barons “made it on her own”? Are you fucking thick? I’m guessing you’re not British as anyone who’s from here knows how it works. Its just reality that shes benefited from extreme nepotism.

Saltburn is proof that if you have beautiful cinematography and ~vibes~ then writing doesn't even matter all that much.

@trinifernandez8870

2 ай бұрын

You forgot the most important part: cute white boys and homoerotic subtext

@simont390

2 ай бұрын

I think that rather depends on what you mean by "matter"

@tonimashdane33498

2 ай бұрын

Use a much better movie that demonstrates visual storytelling over writing, frame it positively, and then I might agree.

@jUQMtDmf

2 ай бұрын

And that's supposed to be a bad thing? Go write a book then. Cinema = Visual. I prefer movies with just the right 'vibes' sometimes, and there's nothing wrong with that.

@levadamusic

2 ай бұрын

Films are not books, thinking that the image does not tell a story is not understanding that cinema is about image and composition, the image is the content

Great analysis- my first video of yours but you’ve got a new sub! I didn’t know why I felt so dissatisfied with the ending!

I rewatched The Talented Mr.Ripley the night right after Sultburn because of their similarities and how I felt so unsatisfied with Sultburn. You incapsulated my thoughts and feelings on both of them so much better than I could and added perfect context and examples to everything. AMAZING video.

Saltburn will go down as one of the most overrated movies I have ever seen

@MENACE-km6bd

2 ай бұрын

It was the Euphoria of movies -- looks great but IS NOT. When finished it, I was so confused. I thought, "Why do I feel like I wasted my time? It was a good movie ... Right?"

@ciudadanakane8743

2 ай бұрын

"barbie" is number 1

@enterthevoidIi

2 ай бұрын

The movie is great and you just wanna be special by criticizing something that many people like 😂

@kostajovanovic3711

2 ай бұрын

​@@enterthevoidIiand many people dislike

@squidthing

2 ай бұрын

​@@enterthevoidIiIs the concept of other people having different tastes completely new to you? Do you think people are faking when they dislike foods, music or movies that you like? What an insanely main character take lmao

Tbh I was legit disappointed by the characterization and plot of farleigh bc he had a lot of potential I’ve actually read 2 articles that stated that saltburn would’ve worked better if farleigh was the lead or it was centered around his POV and I agree I think he best embodied what Emmald wanted Olivier to be with morality, identity, sexuality, social class status etc while adding in the dynamic of him being a biracial American and the fact that he’s a blood relative of the Cotten family. The unique intersectionality coupled with the great portrayal of Archie Madewke would’ve worked but I feel emerald just don’t got the range to go there.

@hlengiwemasuku4161

2 ай бұрын

100%

@vernonchow2032

2 ай бұрын

This is actually where I think Fennel tricked me. The scene with the tutor where Farleigh hadn't done the reading and coasts on the tutor having had a crush on his mother, is what got me to sympathize with Oliver, to the point where I was he had given Felix's bike a flat. As a mixed blood gringo, albeit without a hot mom, I actually like the idea of someone whose grandfather was probably English working class offing the Toffs more than it being a distaff cousin like Farleigh. But I prefer the way the progressive stack functioned in the 1920s to the 2020s. Also, no one ever mentions that "having sex with mother earth" is how Celtic Kings sealed their possession of the land. I find this preoccupation with desire without issue between two-legged animals tiresome. Minotaur!

@je67tbd

2 ай бұрын

Couldn’t agree more! In watching this review I realized the better story would be about Farley and him possibly usurping the wealth from the family, or at least focusing on the interactions and social politics of being biracial within an old money English family.

@Kevin-rg3yc

2 ай бұрын

@@je67tbdright I realized this when first watching the movie and the scene where farleigh and Felix are discussing the family’s undercover racism and how they give support to his mother I thought a second “why isn’t farleigh the lead? Why is this just a short monologue?” This question really got me more by the end of the movie, as aspiring writer I just randomly decided to started conceptualizing a whole fan fiction sequel for farleigh lol

i really loved saltburn, but i read it as a story of what happens when we completely lack empathy rather than the "eat the rich" narrative that fennell intended. as you say, the cattons are kind of annoying but aren't inherently terrible people. felix shows oliver so much kindness throughout their time together, and while he is still incredibly privileged and a bit tone deaf, he's also like 19 years old and has lived in a bubble his whole life, he hadn't had the time to unlearn a lot of the biases he'd absorbed through his upbringing. oliver takes advantage of him and his family thinking that they'd be awful spoiled rich assholes, and yes they're far from perfect but i think he is so wrapped up in his own assumptions of who they are that he can't see any of the good they do possess.

Glad this video exists. What got me through a full viewing of Saltburn was waiting for it to do or say something more, as it felt like it was meaning to for the entire run time. Unfortunately though, it did so in a way that wasn't through building of anticipation but it was something that happened in my head as someone who loves films generally and so I made my own expectations. When it was over, I felt like I had just been released from a two hour long office party story.

@all-caps3927

Ай бұрын

It was hard to see initially due to the Oxford aesthetic which instantly has people thinking it’s a movie about class when this isn't the case and this is due to the poor framing of the movie. There isn't homosexual love in a regular form, in fact there's no love at all in a traditional sense. There is a deeper love for power and greed, Oliver loves Felix for everything he stands for : power, money, sex, social status. That is what Oliver is in love with, and I pass this off as a fact about the movie because it IS: the director herself said that this is a love movie more than anything, and many critiques of the film saw this as a cop out rather than actually realising the film has very little to say about class and falls flat on its face in that element. Before Oliver's story unfolds I’m very sympathetic for his character - until you realise the darkness within. The Cottons are terrible people, so to see suggestions that this is 'a film about the rich for the middle class' is ludicrous because that implies that the audience makes the assumption that every middle class family is coming for their wealth and power which is absolutely insane within any constraints of reality. This is not a film about wealth or class at all for me, and I say it once again : the film falls absolutely flat on its face when it addresses class because there is no one to root for, no good nor bad guys from the the upper or middle class representatives in the film respectively. In fact Oliver in the UK would actually be considered to be Lower Upper class, especially as someone from Liverpool who is without a doubt Upper class in the context of their upbringing. It is a film about greed and lust and an endless desire for more: Ollie could've happily lived his life as part of the Liverpool upper class but that isn't enough for him. I've seen many people make this comment already - but initially Ollie tries his best to make it into the Upper class the 'proper' way- by working hard and going to Oxford. But that interview scene serves as a slap in the face to him - he realises that Farleigh got into Oxford by mere hereditary status. So from this scene he realises the only way to achieve his desires of having power and status is to get there the unfair way, and act as a cancerous parasite. The film in my eyes serves as a critique of the cyclical structure of the upper class, and how they're all terrible people in the context of salt burn. Every scene was grim, whether it included upper or upper middle class people - because it conveys how everyone at the top is terrible: and as soon as the current owners of salt burn die there is someone just as dreadful to replace them. This meaning takes a lot of time to understand, and that is where the film falls short - and I agree the point about the confusion of the viewer whilst watching it. But the fact that some people left that cinema thinking this was a critique of the middle class genuinely shocks me, I mean how distasteful and spiteful do you think directors can get : genuinely you sound like a bunch of conspiracy theorists, I saw a comment that said 'she makes movies like this to keep her privilege as part of the upper class' - Seriously?

@armyofmeh

Ай бұрын

@@all-caps3927 hypothetically, I wouldn't be upset with or think that a movie couldn't comment on class without having someone to root for. Aholes exist on a spectrum after all. Ultimately for this film, regardless of what it was or wasn't going for, I just didn't enjoy it much and was exploring the meaning while watching to make it less of a waste of time in my head.

@all-caps3927

Ай бұрын

@@armyofmeh fair enough, I think the aesthetic of the film is what the majority of people took away from the film, it was beautifully shot and some great actors were involved albeit in a flawed plot.

I wouldn’t call Barry Keoghan “Up and coming” he’s been at this for 10 years 💀

@dannygillespie6614

2 ай бұрын

True, but how many people genuinely knew of him before Banshees?

@kumarvikramaditya9636

2 ай бұрын

​​@@dannygillespie6614I mean he was in *The Killing of A Sacred Deer*, so was definitely known to a substantial horror/thriller nerds.

@firstlast9846

2 ай бұрын

@dannygillespie6614 *ALOT* he was in Love and Hate before that and was known as the “Cat Killer” for years cos of his role, 71 he was great in, Dunkirk.. he’s been known of for a WHILE

@div._.

2 ай бұрын

this omg. yorgos lanthimos' favourite boy

@grmgt

2 ай бұрын

I think she means that only recently he's become a major actor. Think of it like the grammys best new artist, some nominees have been in the game for years but were only nominated the year they got popular.

As I finished the film, all I could think is: Congratulations, Fennel, you made a movie that perfectly encapsulate its protagonista: Shallow, bizarre and awkward. It's like an alienated Glass Onion, but without the fun of having the obvious story unveiling.

@all-caps3927

Ай бұрын

Was there no obvious story unveiling for you? I feel most people disliked the movie out of spite for how obvious the story was - due to the demographic who watched the film most likely having seen Mr Ripley or any other movie referenced in the video.

The thing about commenting on class is having the eye and actually understanding the mentality of the class. If you aren’t poor and never had a real relationship with one, you won’t understand the shame of putting back groceries when you realize you can’t afford it at checkout. Saltburn is written by a wealthy person without empathy for the poors to have a complex relatable protagonist

I have to tell you - I truly think you're a genius and one of the best film critics on youtube. I just found your channel and I love your takes. Thank you for putting into words my problems with this film!!!

Loved the way you broke this down and managed to change the way I view the film entirely. I've never seen more than a few scenes from 'The Talented Mr. Ripley' and only knew the general plot, so it wasn't obvious to me that this movie leaned on it so blatantly. But I think the fact that I didn't make the connection speaks volumes about what 'Saltburn' really is because the movie still managed to give me this mysterious feeling of emptiness the whole way through. Like I was hungry and seduced into believing that I was going to be fed at every turn, but then I was just given ice to suck on instead. It's like the performances, plot and cinematography were all carefully designed to get the audience salivating, but then there is no real return for the appetite it builds because there really isn't much underneath. It's artsy and beautiful looking and the story hooks you enough to keep you invested as a viewer, but those qualities basically trick you into liking it because it's really just trying to pass itself off as a unique and exciting film the whole time.

@chalkedlines8960

2 ай бұрын

"Like I was hungry and seduced into believing that I was going to be fed at every turn, but then I was just given ice to suck on instead." You managed to formulate a single sentence that perfectly illustrates life during late stage capitalism.

@emmaplover3228

2 ай бұрын

I like this, and I agree, it is wasn’t satisfying enough after the build up, even though I enjoyed it visually

@kaseygrace1396

2 ай бұрын

I completely agree with this, I felt the same watching it in theaters. However, I can kind of let it go because it serves as a perfect metaphor of the exact conditions in the movie and the "draw" of the Catton family. The movie is enticing and seductive and beautiful but ultimately unfulfilling and shallow, just like the lifestyle of the family and the whole appeal of Felix and Saltburn.

@JacquelineDeWitt12

2 ай бұрын

@kaseygrace1396 Yes, you are totally right and I think that's actually a great point! There is a 'full circle' quality to the movie's design where the story itself and the style in which the story is told are one in the same. They complement each other and work together to make something that is both alluring, but empty. So it works literally and symbolically, which is definitely very cool. The movie actually becomes a lot more enjoyable when you look at it as being more self-aware than it seems. So it fools us in that way too lol.

@eb5x_789

Ай бұрын

​@JacquelineDeWitt12 that's such a good point it almost makes me like the movie 😂

I have been clocking sooo many pieces of media lately that just drip with "written by a former tumblr user" energy. it's like you can just tell when somebody started out writing fanfic in 2005. filled with nothing but aesthetic scenes meant to be desaturated and reposted in gifsets

@tfoxx17

2 ай бұрын

You say that like it’s a bad thing 😂

@ashwini2215

2 ай бұрын

i get you 100%. i liked saltburn because it was horny as a wattpad fanfic would be. i literally even told my lover months ago how i felt like the director was a former tumblr fangirl

@schmourt

2 ай бұрын

@@tfoxx17 I can't decide if it's bad or good lol. on one hand I love that people who Get It are making media now but on the other hand sometimes it's bad lmfao

@maxsommers6843

2 ай бұрын

Then there's the literal adaptations of Wattpad fics, as well.

@franknfurter5336

2 ай бұрын

can I get euphoria for 500

"When I look at Saltburn I see the ghost of a better movie" - Subscribed

i loved this video so much, however i was so engrossed in your Mr. Ripley recounting that at some point when i remembered this juxtaposition was supposed to go back to saltburn i had to pause the video and sigh/groan because i reminded myself of saltburn

In Patricia Highsmith’s defense, the mixed takes on the book’s queerness make a lot more sense in the context of the Tom in the book, who is defined almost entirely by a sense of deep emptiness. All through the book the abusive narcissist aunt who raised him looms in his psyche and the book points to Tom’s lack of self as a kind of echoism (the flip side of narcissism often found in children of narcissists). I get the impression Highsmith felt critics and audiences were projecting a much stronger sense of self and identity onto Tom than the lack of identity she saw as his defining characteristic. Like there’s clearly queer stuff going on with Tom, but there’s so much more going on psychologically than just the closeted sexuality people latched onto. In the book there’s no one closet for Tom, he had to suppress his entire self

@MaHa-um5sv

2 ай бұрын

yeah, a denial of his identity, which he becomes a master at. He moves through the book like a shark - the very beginning he's being chased, and kind of HAS to leave the US.

@bcs815

2 ай бұрын

@@MaHa-um5sv “moves through the book like a shark” perfect description!

“The ghost of a better movie” YES. Thank you for summing up perfectly my feelings on this movie.

I am so glad other people felt it too, the empty promise that was Saltburn. It promised so much with its visuals and yet fulfilled non of its promises contextually.

I would call the mom’s callous comment about Pamela’s death pretty “bad”. And you see the change on Oliver’s face the same when they can’t remember his name singing happy birthday to him.

You kept saying that Farley tried to sell their stuff, but part of the twist was that Oliver framed Farley for that by stealing his phone after basically assaulting him. Justice for Farley.

@clockwork_mind

2 ай бұрын

Yeah this kept sticking out to me. At first I thought it was just intentionally wrong as a framing device for the part of the video where the twist is finally mentioned, but even then it makes little sense, and I now would actually believe that she totally missed that, considering just how much of this movie she seemed to have missed.

@juliab9709

2 ай бұрын

A LOT of people I know make this mistake to the point I think it must be just that the viewer is exhausted by the time this is revealed and just don't care lol

@iFruit96

2 ай бұрын

@@clockwork_mindthe point she makes still stands

@Its_Chimerical

2 ай бұрын

Then she shouldn't be making the video in my opinion@@juliab9709

@planetofthegapes

2 ай бұрын

"She" didn't even fully grasp the movie, lol.

In addition to making great points about how much Saltburn sucks, this video is a lovely tribute to the Anthony Minghella. Really shows how talented and insightful he was. Since he is sadly no longer with us, this video helps keep his work alive and hopefully exposes him to new people who can appreciate his films

@ninipanini11

Ай бұрын

It definitely did and I will for sure check out the talented mr. ripley!

So glad someone else immediately felt Ripley half way through the film! I only watched it for the first time a few months ago and was blown away so when I watched this, the chasm of emotional depth between the two movies was glaring

Farley didn’t try to sell the items, he was set up by Oliver. Re-watch the movie.❤

Huge agree on most points! The only thing I disagree on is how I read Oliver's final monologue. The movie, while deeply flawed, did actually do a decent amount of footwork trying to convince us that Oliver is an unreliable narrator who tends to lie. Therefore, his final gloating monologue strikes me as discordant with his previous actions (wanting to kiss Felix, the grave scene, the bathtub scene); it makes me think that his actions are purposefully out of alignment with his words and this is him almost "saving face." He's trying to convince himself that he's this conniving villain who wanted to assume Felix's identity, rather than this pathetic lustful man who just wants his straight bestie to love him. The director for all of her flaws did emphasize the obsession and lust aspect of the film, and if you chose to view his monologue and "victory dance" as mournful and deceptive, it at least provides a little more clarity into Oliver as a character. Was this super clear in the film? No. Of course not. But given Oliver's clear obsession with Felix, it's not a stretch to think that Oliver is at least in that way similar to Tom Ripley --and that Felix would still be alive if he reciprocated Oliver's feelings.

@abbyc.4458

2 ай бұрын

Ooh I like this take.

@EarlofSedgewick

2 ай бұрын

Isn't this reinforcing the "gay serial killer" then? Victim-blaming the straight man for not being homosexual, and painting the homosexual character as inherently deviant because they don't fit into society? There are a couple negative responses to Brooey's analysis, and they center on Oliver just being a weak, cowardly homosexual who takes apart an otherwise good family. This seems to be a conservative lens of Mr Ripley, that there are parasites amongst us, and they tend to be the sexually deviant people, rather than an analysis of what the experience of viewing yourself as lesser-than does to a person. I'll be interested to watch both films, perhaps in one weekend and compare the two. Perhaps the problem is the same, but framed from above in one, and below in another.

@Batchall_Accepted

2 ай бұрын

Honestly if they had done it that way, and made it pretty clear that he's actually in denial at the fact that he's stuck with no one now, permanently living a lie, it would have been really impactful. Almost like him getting his comeuppance

@riveranalyse

Ай бұрын

​@@Batchall_AcceptedYes! I don't think he was motivated by wealth, he just wanted a companion. I too wish they'd done it this way, emphasising his victory is hollow.

As a middle clas northern Brit who moved to Oxford in my 20s, new levels of class were revealed to me. Saltburn did a great job of needling at the carefree ignorance, arrested development privilege and cruel snobbery it is possible to witness any given day if you hang around the wrong Oxford pub or coffee shop long enough. I don't believe Oliver really had his plan from the start, despite what he might be trying to convince himself. I think he was obsessed with Felix, but that translated into a scorched earth policy from over exposure to the contemptible dopes in Felix's circle, and realisation that Felix was never going to be his. That isn't to say Oliver isn't a psychotic creep. Also, Saltburn is very funny, the funniest thing Minghella ever made was Cold Mountain, but I'm not sure that was intentional.

@gavriloking5637

2 ай бұрын

Did you watch this video?

@betawolf9044

2 ай бұрын

​@@gavriloking5637don't know about Op but I did. But what exactly of their comment is in conflict with the video? It is just a different view one may have on the film: it not being about imitating Ripley but as an absurdist satire of aristocratic Oxbridge snobbery.

@planetofthegapes

2 ай бұрын

Saltburn can be summed up as "Arseholes meet A Monster". Or it could be seen as a House of Cards-style version of Wuthering Heights: a lower class man rises through the ranks of a rich family, and destroys them.

@dope8878

2 ай бұрын

@@planetofthegapeshe’s not lower class at all. Thats part of the plot, he’s basically rich himself and wants to be more than that

@earhearthush-up5549

2 ай бұрын

Yeah I’m actually kind of shocked that people aren’t picking up on that. I think it’s made almost obvious in two ways: During the middle section of the film, his seduction of venetia and his reeling back from it when Felix expresses disapproval is super clumsy. It’s not at all a calculated chess master move, it’s more like him throwing shit at the wall to see what works, backtracking when he realizes he makes a miss step. Then finally at the end what we think is just him narrating to the audience or to himself his diabolical plot is him talking to the mother before he also clumsily kills her. Like he has to say it out loud in order to convince himself “uh yeah.. I planned this all from the start!! Totally..” In a sense although it is derivative of Talented Mr. Ripley, Theorema, Borgman and dozens of other works that follow the “Mysterious Stranger” archetypal story structure, it does at least attempt to deconstruct it in that sense. I think the media and fans are giving it too much credit, and this video too little.

It is very telling that the first movie that Emerald Fennell, who had a super upper-class upbringing, makes about "eating the rich" or class in general is not that good at examining class. It kind of makes me concerned about her viewpoint of middle and working class people considering how she portrays both sides.

great video, just what ive been missing these past few weeks. Gonna check out the pod as well!

24:27 Your English correspondent confirms his posh credentials by thinking that Nottingham is in the North, rather than the Midlands. Unironically hilarious.

@085cur1ty

2 ай бұрын

seriously that guy was ridiculous

@alanpennie8013

2 ай бұрын

His point was that nobody knows where Nottingham is. It's in that nebulous nowhere place sometimes called The East Midlands.

@aeddiefarmer

Ай бұрын

He's also not correct that posh people are only in the south- if you go to the landed gentry level they are all over the country, because they own the land.

@likeawestern335

Ай бұрын

Nottingham is in the North

@likeawestern335

Ай бұрын

​@aeddiefarmer true but the spread is more south-centric regardless of it overall spanning the whole nation

SHAKING THE TABLE!!!

This was SO well done!! Also perfect timing as I rewatched Talent Mr Ripley this week haha

your podcast is the only thing making me look forward to the start of each week! I knew your voice was familiar!

Farleigh didn't steal anything. He was framed by Oliver, surprised that wasn't pointed out. I also see the Korean movie Parasite as an inspiration.

@Scynthor

2 ай бұрын

Me too, n i aint even seen it

@MushiePuppet17

2 ай бұрын

It may have been an inspiration, but is kind of an odd inversion. was way better and played with similar themes in a way less confused way.

@marocat4749

2 ай бұрын

and that parasite tackles a lot korean issues like them having to lie and network to get jobs and, imitate what makes life in south korea suck apearently.@@MushiePuppet17

While I can understand why the movie made an impact, especially on younger adults due to the more "shocking" scenes going viral and the casting of two popular young men who people thirst over online, as well as its better qualities in the form of the acting and cinematography, I agree with you. Its main success was with people who were unfamiliar with the movie's inspirations. and that it's derivative of older, better works with not much cohesive or interesting to say of its own.

my biggest issue with Saltburn was Oliver's motivations feel non-existant even after the reveal

I love your points about the cinematography and I think a lot of your previous points about surface level borrowing from other media fit the shot composition perfectly. A lot of the shots draw back on cinematography from other famous movies but miss the meaning and reason for those dramatic, iconic shots.

“Mom I want the talented mr ripley!” “we have the talented mr ripley at home dear.” “but mooooom-“

Me: Saltburn is just Call Me By Your Name with a higher body count and Euphoria filter. My brother: Right, basically just the gay version of Call Me By Your Name.

@crakhaed

2 ай бұрын

Am I misremembering that film or wasn't that about a gay relationship between a teenager and an adult? Or I'm missing the joke

@xHal1

2 ай бұрын

@@crakhaed I think that's the joke.

The worst part of the film was how they explained the ending, frame by frame, as if it wasn't blatantly obvious that Oliver killed Felix, and the director thinks the audience is too stupid to figure it out

5:33 "When I look into Saltburn, I see the ghost of a better movie." Bars

I think the problem with Saltburn is that people went into the film expecting it to be a criticism of the upper class when Emerald Fenell, an upper class woman, is not able to separate herself from her wealth enough to serve that. Instead, Saltburn is a criticism of the upper middle class and the way they co-opt the voices and struggles of the lower class to cosplay poverty in order to take up the spots reserved within society for those of lower status thus perpetuating a society where money and opportunities only transfers from one rich person to another. As someone who has grown up with Olivers, this film doesn’t ring untrue to reality. Is it a film with impeccable commentary that adds a lot to the conversation? No, but it also shouldn’t be judged as a film attempting to look at the problems of the upper class as that isn’t what it is about.

@angelsunemtoledocabllero5801

2 ай бұрын

You say this as if it was a good thing. "I think people were expecting this movie to be a criticism of nazis but because the director is a nazi is actually a criticism of jews so everything is fine." Is a reactionary movie for the Brexit era that just tells us to fear the poor. If you want a film like what you are describing just watch The King of Comedy or Nightcrawler.

@angelsunemtoledocabllero5801

2 ай бұрын

In any case if you dont want a movie about class then dont put tons of references in the movie about money. Funny Games is a good example of a movie that is focused on rich people but because the director didnt want to talk about class in that particular movie he left all the references to class out.

@dalilaescayola9826

2 ай бұрын

⁠@@angelsunemtoledocabllero5801thats a whole new sentence, pretty lazy response

@angelsunemtoledocabllero5801

2 ай бұрын

@@dalilaescayola9826 The irony of "pretty lazy response" being a pretty lazy response.

@dope8878

2 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@angelsunemtoledocabllero5801this isn’t the same at all. First, this kind of statement is a straw man. The upper class are not nazis and the upper middle class are not Jewish people. It’s a terrible, ugly analogy to make in any regard. A similar more accurate analogy would be “I think people were expecting this movie to criticize nazis, but because the director is a nazi, it’s actually a criticism of the klu klux klan.” But in either analogy, it’s sort of a straw man that exists to shut down the other argument before you care to listen.

I agree with a lot of the points in this video. I thought of Saltburn as a "fun movie" and less so as a "high brow film", which made watching it a good experience rather than a disappointing one. If I had gone to the theater seeking another Ripley, I would have enjoyed the movie far less. In particular, the point about the rich characters not being that bad: I found Farleigh and the nerdy boy at the beginning to be the most dislikable characters. And I think this shows a clear failing in the script/directing, if they were going for true class commentary. These characters are NOT the over-the-top rich ones who are portrayed as the morally bad in Talented Mr. Ripley or similar films. They are the ones who are (upper) middle class, perhaps seeking a way in similar to Oliver. So it seems overall in Saltburn, the main moral failing is NOT succeeding in being rich like the Cattons. Oliver succeeds and is thus portrayed as a sort of hero, gloating in his win at the end. Yes, the film is fun to watch in many ways, but if serious class commentary was the goal, Fennel fell hopelessly short. Also, I think the phenomenon described here is more a "tiktokification" rather than a "tumblrification", as it makes movies more about sound bites, montages, and shock value rather than substance. This is what people seek with our post-pandemic 10second video attention spans. But I'm still on Tumblr in 2024, writing essays about obscure television, so who am I to talk.

@samryb

2 ай бұрын

OMGGGGGG do you have a PhD in PsychoAnalysis?!!!!! Can you help me?!

@laurd11

2 ай бұрын

@@samryb 🙄

I met a girl who adored this film, she concistently tried to signal to me that she was posh but randomly stated 'i don't care about that stuff'. It's a red flag film.

I don’t know how we’re supposed to root for Oliver - I knew he was manipulative from the beginning and not loyal to his friends. But then when everything comes out, I just feel pure disgust which just gets stronger and stronger. I want him to face justice, not feel compelled to understand why he does things.

I wonder if her being so derivative of talented Mr. Ripley has roots in English/British elitism. Seems like she wants to be known for major classic English works but acts unawares about a seemingly popular American movie/novel. Could be a stretch but it’s highly unlikely she hasn’t seen the movie and thus could influence her 😅

@jziffi

2 ай бұрын

The Talented Mr Ripley was directed by an Englishman, so not sure that holds up!

@toomuchinformation

2 ай бұрын

She has but downplayed the comparisons.

@Abcdefg-tf7cu

2 ай бұрын

​@@jziffi Patricia Highsmith is American

@jziffi

2 ай бұрын

@@Abcdefg-tf7cu Of course, it's an American novel and film. But I'm not sure the idea that an English director would feel conflicted about crediting an American film when the director of that American film was also English holds up. To the degree that she may be playing down comparisons with TTMR it's probably because she doesn't want people to think she's ripping it off.

@stevecarter8810

2 ай бұрын

Yeah, American cinema is so globally dominant it doesn't make any sense to sweep some of it under the rug just because of national pride. It's much more likely she wants to minimise the chances of viewers making this connection for fear of getting dismissed as derivative.

This kind of reminds me of a video I saw recently on the recent trend of prestige "race-based horror", or more specifically, horror about American anti-black racism, and how a lot of it was well-made, but ultimately just cynical art made for the consumption of a white audience, precipitated by the success of Get Out. This kind of cynical coattail riding of prestige trends in filmmaking have started to stick out to me more over time.

@baintreachas

2 ай бұрын

What was that video called, if you remember?

@DorkN313

2 ай бұрын

> a lot of it was well-made, but ultimately just cynical art made for the consumption of a white audience it's basically movies for white "anti-racist" people to masturbate to themselves over how they're not racist, unlike those other racist "anti-racist" people. same with Saltburn. no thoughts, no theme. just a movie for middle class people to masturbate to how they're so against the rich, while doing absolutely nothing

@seamusthatsthedog4819

2 ай бұрын

Blacksploitation 2: Electric Boogaloo!

@Batchall_Accepted

2 ай бұрын

What you're saying makes sense but I'm having a hard time coming up with any examples of the top off my head. What movies are doing this?

Moral of the Story: As a Rich Person not only should you fear poor people and black people, but you should also fear middle class people and mixed race people! Perfect analogy for the for the current widening wealth gap sweeping the western world and the returns to racism/fascism. I don't think the director even realises how sick she is.

@babypeach370

Ай бұрын

if that is what you got out of this movie, you really need to rewatch it again and actually think about what you are seeing. ive never seen anybody miss the point of a movie so bad.

@betadine497

Ай бұрын

@@babypeach370 Please enlighten me. What is the "point" of the movie? Do a bit of research into the director and watch some reviews of the film for more insight. I am not saying it is the "point", that might have not been the directors intention, but rather her unconscious bias coming out in full force. The film is LITERALLY about a lying/psychotic middle class boy wriggling his way into the lives of the elite/ richest people in England. The only other bad/negative character is a black guy that is doing the same thing, manipulating and trying to maintain his position in that family. The elite family are made out to be angels, loveable, dopey, accepting, relaxed. It is the definition of 'Punching down', if you have ever heard of that phrase. WAKE TF UP AND GET OVER THE TUMBLR AESTHETIC, COS THATS ALL YOU ARE SEEING! and lemme guess you are under the age of 20 and from America

“I think she set the movie in 2006 so we could get the MGMT montage” that’s an accurate burn, but it’s also represent the whole decision making process in this movie, which is just series of lazy and shallow cliches.

"Elsbeth is callous about Carey Mulligan but I think that's more a testament to a fraud friendship than anything" ok girl but the consequence of her callousness and prejudice because she thinks Pamela's lying is that the poor girl gets killed lol that's PRETTY F*CKING BAD in my books, she was in a seriously dangerous situation and Elsbeth only saw her as a form of entertainment she had grown tired of. Also we are explicitly told about how dismissive she is of the fact, that's insanely cruel, not just rude. I think you're underestimating just how bad these people were.

@likeawestern335

Ай бұрын

They're bad, but the film never actually villainess them for it. It's not just the characters playing it off as if it doesn't matter, the film plays it off as if it doesn't matter. Its a film by a rich posh person where the rich posh people are bad, but not as bad as tbe creepy middle class person looking to take all their money from them

@all-caps3927

Ай бұрын

agreed

@all-caps3927

Ай бұрын

@@likeawestern335 I think you've completely missed the point of the movie which I initially did as the majority of the audience were coerced into thinking this was a movie about class when it isn't and it's very hard to see that as a result of the Oxford aesthetic we are conditioned to at the start. It is a movie about love and obsession and the endless desire for more and more, and highlights the fact that Ollie's love for Felix wasn't just at the surface level of gay love but rather a love for everything he stood for. The failure of the movie for me was due to the fact that the wrong aesthetic was chosen to convey the ultimate message, and it took me a while to actually understand what the message of the movie is and I think the movie itself gets confused with this narrative too. there are no good characters or ones to root for, and it becomes very apparent throughout the subliminals of the movie that the rich are absolutely horrible for no reason, despite the fact you somehow fail to recognise this?

@likeawestern335

Ай бұрын

@@all-caps3927 no, death of the author. Whatever interpretation your deride from the money is true and the money has many elements of class warfare in it which it fails to capitalise on. Therefore saying it fails in doing so is completely valid.

@likeawestern335

Ай бұрын

@@all-caps3927 also, that's just your interpretation of the movie you're trying to pass off as fact. Yes the movie has elements of obsession but there's no love. No one in that movie loves anyone. If you've gone into that movie thinking somehow Oliver loves Felix I feel you've accredited a sympathetic element to his character that simply isn't there. Hell, even the family he visits don't love eachother. Oliver is a middle class parasite who worms his way into this family and makes himself irreplaceable in a toxic relationship and kills off any anyone who gets in his way. He's a cancer killing the rich, however the film doesn't know how to frame it properly or even know what it wants to say itself so it also paints Oliver as the villain more so than the rich elite giving this sort of boogeyman vibe from Oliver. Be careful rich people, the middle classes want to steal your fortunes. If the movie were to end at the death of Oliver, the death of the symbolic character the love and obsession is supposedly built around then maybe I'd believe your interpretation, but there's a further 45 minutes after that devoid of any love, only obsession for Oliver to elevate his status and take their fortune ( his obsession clearly set in the class element there). Hell, that last 45 minutes actively say "hey audience, in case you couldn't tell Oliver never loved or cared for Felix, he just wanted the money". And even if your interpretation was true, would the fact most people didn't get that and you actively didn't get it on first viewing either not show an incompetence from the film makers POV? Would it not show an inability of the director to get their point across?

Like all your videos, I love this review, even if I disagree. However one big thing that I think the video and people in the comments may be getting wrong: Oliver's monologue at the end revealing what he did and how he did it. I think this scene purposefully uses the visual tropes of "the mastermind revealing their meticulous plan" as a sort of misdirection. In the reality of the film, Oliver didn't ACTUALLY know from the start that the end result of his involvement with Felix would be him owning Saltburn. Him putting the screw in the tire wasn't "Step One of my Nefarious Plan". What we are really seeing is a montage of him being opportunistic at every chance, of him leveraging Felix and his family's sympathies whenever he can to his greatest benefit. He's an impulsive and manipulative narcissist, not a Bond villain. So the scene is framing Oliver the way he sees himself--as this suave genius villain. It is using a well-worn trope we are so familiar with to undermine our own assumptions about what information is actually being conveyed. Ultimately, all the class critique is window-dressing. The real point of the movie is that there are emotional and psychological whims that can ferry some people from drinking someone's bath water one day, to ending their life in cold blood the next.

@clockwork_mind

2 ай бұрын

This was a really cool take I had never considered! (And I'm glad I found it under this video that I can barely watch, because it feels so out of touch with the film.)

@ryansabin2618

2 ай бұрын

Great comment

@kaseygrace1396

2 ай бұрын

wow you just completely changed my opinion on the ending. Thats why theres so much emphasis on the "I didnt love him, I wasnt in love with him" bit. We learned without a doubt that Oliver is a liar, especially to the viewer, so of course the end monologue implying this was his master plan the whole time is a lie too. I "get it" now I think, lol. Thanks :)

@juliadandy6019

2 ай бұрын

THANK YOU! Totally agree. Very much disagree with most points here in the video. Ripley is for sure a better movie, but most of the points kinda miss here. Amanda The Jedi I think had a great review - that the movie us much more about Oliver being in love and in denial about that really.

@sweetestpotato4392

2 ай бұрын

Yes thank you! And so far this review ignores that the butler is shown looming at the funeral, and the butler always suspects Oliver. So the ending is not only “the reveal” as this review claims. Your take is more aligned, but instead this review and many commenters are taking Oliver the liar at his word which was the same deadly mistake that others made.

Just found your channel and I thoroughly enjoyed this take! There’s way too much self-congratulation taking place in cinema today; movies getting praise for being “right” without actually doing the work of fleshing out the conflicts of their protagonists. I’d love to see you do a review of Poor Things! It came up short for me on a lot of levels but i have a hard time articulating the problems i have with it from a cinematic perspective. Subbed!