The fact it flew into space, did a flight and then landed UNMANNED is outstanding.

@fork9001

Жыл бұрын

@@Exposer247 You believe the American STS didn’t fly either?

@fork9001

Жыл бұрын

@@Exposer247 I know how this ends. “… Therefore the earth is flat because…”

@WarhammerWings

Жыл бұрын

@@Exposer247 Get a life, plebian. Or slither back into the ooze you squelched out of.

@dnewbury52

Жыл бұрын

Actually an unmanned flight is considerably simpler than a manned one. No crew means no concerns for environment, water, food, oxygen and guaranteed live return.

@ImieNazwiskoOK

Жыл бұрын

@dnewbury52 In that regard yes. However it demonstrated that it didn't necessarily require crew.

Мои родители проектировали станок для производства термоплитки Бурана, мама очень гордилась, что за все время полета отвалилось всего 6 плиток.

@user-oo7xy9el7l

Жыл бұрын

мы просто обязаны все восстановить и никогда больше не допускать рыночников до принятия решений.

@andreus5113

Жыл бұрын

@@user-oo7xy9el7l рыночники на луну высадились, а в россии при олигархическом правитильстве не рыночная, и даже не плановая экономика

@0verJlord

Жыл бұрын

​@@andreus5113 Приватизация👍

@Leo-eh8hm

Жыл бұрын

@@user-oo7xy9el7l Эти рыночники на луне были, запускают космические телескопы и новейшие спутники для исследований других планет в то так ещё и делают новейшие ракеты о которых россия мечтать только и может и вряд ли когда нибудь догонит США.

@user-yw7kd8ch5v

Жыл бұрын

​@@Leo-eh8hm автоматические станции СССР на Венере были 8 раз, с 60х годов. А пиндосы луну сняли в Голливуде.

Мужики. Я после окончания МАИ попал в этот проект. Да, был салагой (молодым специалистом), но многое из ЭТОГО видел и участвовал. И ГОРЖУСЬ!!! Более глобальных проектов моя страна больше НЕ зналана. А жаль.

@pbtyo

9 ай бұрын

пиздовал бы ты лучше в совхоз продукты питания стране давать, что б не приходилось в очередях за всем стоять

Это было 32 года назад - сука 32 года назад! Без суперкомпьютеров и крутых камер и вообще всего, что есть сейчас, они смогли сначала запустить эту махину на орбиту а потом посадить в полностью автоматическом режиме! Эти люди опередили время - я плачу с одной стороны от гордости за них и с другой от того, что все это исчезло. Мне сложно представить, где бы была российская космонавтика если бы их наработки и опыт передавались все 32 года. Где был сделан поворот не туда? Почему все это просрано, и как обидно что время упущено!

@oboltustraharius1138

2 жыл бұрын

Это было сделано при коммунистах, даже без суперкомпьютеров, а сегодня суперкомпьютеры есть, но они используются, чтобы через распознавание лиц отлавливать коммунистов в метро, как Обухова на "Партизанской". В РФ сейчас классический банановый латиноамериканский режим, и как бы нам Соловьев не рассказывал про героическое противостояние Америке, Путин - проамериканский сукин сын.

@icior2010

Жыл бұрын

30 лет назад появилась новая эпоха, компьютерная эра, ссср пролетал над ней как фанера над парижем, пришлось развалиться иначе страну ждало ужасное отставание от мира.

@alextrunin4927

Жыл бұрын

@@icior2010 ты болен, какой лютый бред!

@icior2010

Жыл бұрын

@@alextrunin4927 ракеты самолеты это технологии 50-70х потом началась новая эпоха, электроника компьютеры, ссср в неё не попадал. в конце 80х на западе были персональные спутнковые телефоны, в ссср использовали таксофоны

@user-yj6dh5ln3d

Жыл бұрын

@@icior2010 ты дурачок что-ли ? Всё было в СССР, но не для всех . Огромные деньги уходили на оборону и содержание других стран , поэтому и созрели предпосылки для распада , Америку это ожидает в ближайшем будущем .

It's a real shame that after the collapse of the Soviet Union the shuttle was abandon and left to rot.

@alexkomarov5672

3 жыл бұрын

Its very expensive about 6x times of Soyuz launch cost

@shujixiesi

2 жыл бұрын

@@alexkomarov5672 Still... If the space shuttle could be built on a mass scale like T-34, maybe humans could live on Mars by now... Or at least such a masterpiece of science and art should be kept in great condition so when the country is better in finance, it could be utilized in the future.

@astrakboat

2 жыл бұрын

@Sid agreed, useless, same as american shuttle. russians just had to copy western stupidity....ie concord. And who can forget: kzread.info/dash/bejne/oah62amse7u1c84.html

@RobSchofield

2 жыл бұрын

Hmmmm.... higher orbital load capacity, better aerodynamics, higher percentage of recoverable components from the launcher: engines with higher thermal efficiency than the RS-25, automated launch/orbit/land system shown to be accurate on first flight within 25m of the planned stop line, and less than a metre off the runway centreline? Oh, and all this without true FBW or GPS.... far, far superior to the US shuttle, and only one part of a modular launch system that could put bigger loads into LEO and GeoStat? Yeah, definitely a crap copy with no purpose.

@slordmo2263

2 жыл бұрын

@@RobSchofield Hey, guy.... it's always easier to follow your 'big brother' into the unknown.... as far as I'm concerned, having an 'unmanned' test flight, for a 'man rated' vehicle, was an 'incomplete' mission in my book... and hmm...about 7 years after the US had been flying the shuttle. As far as the 'landing' of the ONLY launch, it had to go around twice before it landed, because of some 'wind shear' problem?? The real tragedy is that the standalone 'Energia' heavy lift vehicle wasn't continued to help launch parts of the ISS years later....it would have helped...just saying....

It's almost more amazing to me that this was a fully automated orbit, flight, and landing. No crew!

@metatechnologist

2 жыл бұрын

It's because they knew it was unsafe.

@threehead99

2 жыл бұрын

You do know there were multiple automated test flights of Gemini and Apollo missions? It's not that amazing.

@threehead99

2 жыл бұрын

@@auronoxe you do realize that every Shuttle landing was automated, right? If the pilot did anything the flight computer knew was wrong, it ignored the pilot input and stayed to the program.

@auronoxe

2 жыл бұрын

@@threehead99 I don‘t know. Wikipedia tells that the Shuttle was equipped only since 2006 with an auto pilot. But it was never used. Quite possible it offered „assistants“ like the one you mentioned.

@threehead99

2 жыл бұрын

@@auronoxe Wikipedia also has flat earth pages. The only non automatic part of the landing was deploying the landing gear.

Как же грустно что это был его единственный полёт

@clawham

Жыл бұрын

На самом деле прекрасно - всего 6 плиток отвалилось - напомню колумбии хватило 4-х но из кромки крыла чтоб убить опытнейший экипаж и наделать шуму на долго. а этот буран да был крутым но мегадорогим и не менее опасным. увы. факты таковы что большой корабль летающий в атмосфере не может выходить в космос и назад - шаттлы остановили изза того что они мегадорогими выходят если перед каждым полетом каждую запчасть проверять а если не проверять - будут аварии и катастрофы.

@634alexey

Жыл бұрын

@@clawham Все отдавали себе отчет о стоимости полетов, а значит задачи, которые Буран должен был выполнять и перспективы, того стоили.

@clawham

Жыл бұрын

@@634alexey ни одного полета для выполнения какихто задач кроме "можем повторить" он не выполнял и не выполнил. ну да..смогли...повторить чтото похожее на шаттл и оно вродебы якобы даже слетало кудато один раз чудьм не сгорев - 6 плиток отвалилось. достижение...вместо пары городов отстроенных до уровня европейских - один раз пульнуть куском железа вникуда ради ничего. как и с лунной програмой высадки человека..к тому моменту как разродились повторить - уже никому это было и не надо. так ещё и не получилось нихрена :)

@634alexey

Жыл бұрын

@@clawham " пульнуть куском железа вникудаа ради ничего" - столько информации и всё впустую... знатно вам мозг промыло, сочувствую

@clawham

Жыл бұрын

@@634alexey ну да он же выполнял много полезных научных оборонных и туристических миссий сделал 100500 открытий которые обнаровованы в журнале сайнс и по которым докторские дисертации позащищали добрая дюжина докторов наук? ой нет...пульнули надорвав пупок один раз поняли что мегадорого и бесполезно и все на свалку.

Какие же раньше крутые у нас были инженеры и ученые, на такой примитивной электронике создать такой сложный проект, браво!

@Jackerst27

2 жыл бұрын

Какие бы минусы не были у СССР, но инженеры и учёные были тогда самыми лучшими в мире, а щас всё импортное, и своего ничего толком не производим... И родину продали, и это очень грустно...

@pavelpisarenko8350

2 жыл бұрын

@@Jackerst27 это правда! Были уникальные люди!

@alexresqw

Жыл бұрын

@@pavelpisarenko8350 и сейчас есть просто их мало

@user-jn3cg7jt9t

Жыл бұрын

Кто вам сказал что в те времена электроника была примитивная? Ноутбук в 89м был, правда только у военных, причём не иностранного происхождения,это либерасты после развала Союза все почти похерили, кроме остатков ВПК, а так все китайское, позорище, одни понты остались

@meytv5691

Жыл бұрын

@@user-jn3cg7jt9t как назывался ноутбук?

first and ONLY orbital flight. unmanned as well. this is a cool upload--THANKS

@Rafa-rm3ev

2 жыл бұрын

the earth is flat too

@TeeJayyzx

2 жыл бұрын

@@Rafa-rm3ev huh?

@Deproelior

2 жыл бұрын

Arguably superior to the shuttle

@piotrd.4850

2 жыл бұрын

This was literally 80s technology at best - and first time, ad hoc put complete mission profile on totally new system. It was 2nd flight of Energya and 1st of Buran. Compare it to series of RUDs by SpaceX xD

@bogdog999

2 жыл бұрын

@@Deproelior Nonsense. The version of the Soviet shuttle that flew was just a shell. It had no life support systems inside to support a crew. No galley, no sleeping quarters, no toilet. That would have come later had the program continued. A second vehicle was 90% finished when it was cancelled. The U.S. shuttle could have been automatic landing, but we preferred a live pilot.

This is amazing. I've never seen all of this great footage of the Buran's mission before. It saddens me that the program would not continue after this. 😥

@RedLP5000S

2 жыл бұрын

@@acbulgin2 thanks for the great insight. Yeah, most of America's engineering/scientific breakthroughs were achieved by "borrowing" the scientists or engineers from other nations. It's quite laughable really.

@navad108

2 жыл бұрын

I didn't realize they flew it around with the normal jet engines so many times. I think they said like 20 flights?

@doiron12

2 жыл бұрын

@@RedLP5000S Since the only true Americans were Native ones and everyone in American came from other countries your comment is quite laughable really.

@mikev2066

2 жыл бұрын

maybe it will continue in the next season of "For all mankind" :)

@cesare8270

Жыл бұрын

@@RedLP5000S What, do you think America copied Russia on this? It was the other way around, Russia copied the Space Shuttle. also why am i replying to a year old comment lol

I simply love this amazing and powerful shuttle Buran and launch rocket Energija, both names are mighty! I feel great pride! Greetings from Czechia, stay safe and be healthy!

@postergmail6202

Жыл бұрын

Mighty names. Useless vehicles.

@andreschablechable8118

Жыл бұрын

@@postergmail6202 ja ja ja cuando eres el ingeniero de la estupidez y la ignorancia. No hay vacuna a eso!!

@9.5.9.5

11 ай бұрын

@@postergmail6202 how

Fantastic video. I gained an interest in Buran after living in the Arabian Gulf for many years. In Bahrain was what seemed to be a Space Shuttle parked on the Manama corniche. I just assumed it was some kind of mock-up, perhaps built for children's "Space Camps". I later discovered that it was actually 'Buran 002' - which by a convoluted series of events had ended up stranded and unwanted in Bahrain!

@Emophiliac2

2 жыл бұрын

That was the Buran test vehicle, which is now in Germany.

@Nik_TheAstronaut

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, the Buran 002 (OK-GLI), used for testing the automated landing of Buran. It is now in Speyer, Germany at a museum.

@joekeira

2 жыл бұрын

Are you same Annie who worked at the British Consulate?

@petrnovak9952

Жыл бұрын

@@Nik_TheAstronaut SSSR mělo sedm demostrátorů při vývoji kosmoplánu Buran (OK-GLI) byl vybaven proudovými motory, ale byl neschopný letu na oběžnou dráhu, sloužil jenom pro testování letů klouzavým letem. NASA při vývoji raketoplánu měla pouze jeden demonstrátor Enterprise.

Crazy to see how colorful the inside of the assembly building is compared to the rotting hulk it is today.

Не знаю, как нашёл этот ролик. Красивые кадры, которые я ещё не видел. Спасибо!

@user-iv2cj2ww9x

2 жыл бұрын

Я тоже эти кадры не видел.

@goodideagood1903

2 жыл бұрын

Почти все кто участвовал в программе Буран, имеют это видео...

@madeinukraine6087

2 жыл бұрын

Это рандомный подбор ютуба чувак

@floks700

Жыл бұрын

Сука, только ленивый в Союзе их не видел. Или ктото из деревни без телевизора. Вы, похоже циплята годовалые 😂😂😂

15:47 - "Это большой вклад в ту Перестройку которая проводится в Нашей стране". Люди все еще верили в будущее, они не знали что больше Бураны летать не будут.

@user-bf9rh8ml9i

2 жыл бұрын

Илон Маск без всяких перестроек построил ракеты кои покруче всяких буранов/челноков и т.д.: государства такого не делали, а частник - сделал

@sddndsiduae4b-688

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-bf9rh8ml9i даже в США Маск без сотрудничества NASA не смог бы добится того чего он добился, что касается СССР/РФ то тут ЕМУ прямо сказали - все ракеты военные технологии, мы не понимаем о чём Вы собираетесь договариваться молодой человек (а значит что частникам без друзей в погонах с волосатыми руками космосом в рф заниматься нельзя) мало того до перестройки (о которой собственно речь) в ссср частников не было (если не считать частниками тех кто ремонтировал свои квартиры и строил маленькие домики на садовых участках) - никакую компанию, строющую по сложности чтото сравнимое с орбитальными ракетами они создать не могли.

@fate-no

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-bf9rh8ml9i Дурак ты, батенька. На этого "частника" пол омерики горбатится, даже не всегда осознавая это. Глубже смотри на явление.

@user-bf9rh8ml9i

2 жыл бұрын

@@fate-no и все довольны, все хорошо зарабатывают, все обеспечены и шмотками, и продуктами, и автомобилями, и даже, домами! На улицах чисто - можно белые кеды не мыть месяцами, так что не я дурак, а вы, коли пишете такое

@fate-no

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-bf9rh8ml9i Дык, уезжай на ПМЖ в "благословенную". Кто держит-то?

When I was a teenager in the late 1980s my Dad suscribed to Time magazine. They always kept up with the Soviet space program. Those were the articles I would read first.

@IvorMektin1701

2 жыл бұрын

Aviation Week at my house

@andrejrockshox

2 жыл бұрын

@Ken Mason you are joking. nice one.

@xSir1uSx

2 жыл бұрын

@Ken Mason American propaganda

@user-ze8ze3lj4v

2 жыл бұрын

@Ken Mason My God. Where do you get this nonsense from? I am always shocked by the propaganda in magazines and films about Russia and the USSR. This is about how to study the history of the United States using Torontino films.

@bigal1863

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ze8ze3lj4v Or maybe spelling at the Tarantino academy for r-tards?

The Cosmodrome is a cool name.

@trololoev

2 жыл бұрын

like if Kreng use it ;)

Преклоняюсь перед мощью полёта мысли , волей в достижении результата и инженерным талантом нашего народа. Прощальный аккорд Советского союза. Трагедия и гордость людей, создавших это чудо. Спасибо им.

@gign_141

2 жыл бұрын

Все еще впереди!

@siniyden

2 жыл бұрын

спасибо им за что? За то что их проект ограбил страну?

@red_star1

Жыл бұрын

​@@siniyden ограбили страну Горбатый, Ельцин и их окружение. А данный проект был рассчитан и выполнен плановой экономикой без ущерба для граждан.

@kinio7876

Жыл бұрын

​@@red_star1 hahahahahah durak

@red_star1

Жыл бұрын

@@kinio7876 hihihi dolboeb

Просто до изжоги доводит желание уничтожить до 10 колена предателей разрушивших мою родину. Я ведь помню эти кадры по телевизору. Мне было 11 лет.

@AlexR860

2 жыл бұрын

Неужто так назад в СССР хочется? Соскучились по дефициту и очередям в магазинах?

@Alisher88888

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlexR860 дефицит был создан теми же предателями.

@siniyden

2 жыл бұрын

@@Alisher88888 дефицит в сове было всего и всегда

@user-nn6xo5vm1o

Жыл бұрын

дешевые советские понты. а толку ноль! и где сейчас этот мусор?! на свалке! пхахахаха... клоуны советские!

@nullsubs

Жыл бұрын

@@siniyden а сейчас всего много но купить вы ничего не можете. И сидите гадаете что же произойдет завтра - может очередная оптимизация, а может война

Kind of funny how they had 'The final countdown' from "Europe" playing at the end.

@zeom76

2 жыл бұрын

I remember that song and music were popular in the Eastern block. It was also the official music during the Mediterenean Games in Syria (1987 I think).

@Polymathes

2 жыл бұрын

Even stranger is "Sumer is icumen in", a Medieval rota, played at hyper tempo.

@lorenzopinto7948

2 жыл бұрын

At 8:00 and 11:50 you can hear an italian prog piece: "Amore Grande, Amore Libero" composed in 1975 by "Il Guardiano del Faro" (Federico Monti Arduini)...🤣

@oboltustraharius1138

2 жыл бұрын

@@Polymathes It's Soviet synthesiser version of this canon, was released among other electronic reworkings of classic music pieces in 1980 on "Metamorphoses" vinyl.

Люди, спасибо всем за добрые комментарии к прекрасному видео и за тёплые слова в адрес создателей уникальной системы Энергия-Буран. Довелось поучаствовать и в разработке, и в строительстве. Правда, тогда мы просто ездили на работу.

@Dark_knight1980

7 ай бұрын

Огромное уважение вам и вашей хорошей работе по созданию отличной машины, товарищ 👏 👍

Это видео вызывает очередную гордость за СССР! Очень рад, что хоть немного застал этой страны! Вот это были люди!

@OlegSimonenko

2 жыл бұрын

в чем гордость? в том что все воровали у запада с опозданием на 10 лет и делали подделки? І том что все изобретатели бьіли заключеннгьіми и сам королев которьій запустил гагарина в космос тоже сидел а кинохронику снимали не о изобретателях а о вертухаях и о пропагандонах..

@user-iu8ki1uo6n

2 жыл бұрын

@@OlegSimonenko зато сейчас не воруют. Летают на советских галошах.

@user-bf9rh8ml9i

2 жыл бұрын

тот, кому своим нечем гордиться - начинает гордиться государством

@user-oq4uj9vf6j

Жыл бұрын

@@user-bf9rh8ml9i своим государством, без которого всё начинают "осваивать" чужие.

@user-bf9rh8ml9i

Жыл бұрын

@@user-oq4uj9vf6j иди китаю поклонись

Art and Science at its best. I love Buran. It should get the respect it deserves

Love the weird soviet space background music 😂

@skunkjobb

2 жыл бұрын

Me too but at 16:48, it was the Swedish song "The final countdown".

@Hyperious_in_the_air

2 жыл бұрын

sovietwave. some of my favorite music since it makes me nostalgic for a spacerace future that never happened.

@dmitrilebedev8635

2 жыл бұрын

You can find this album searching KZread for "Eduard Artemyev - Metamorphoses" (my comment with a URL was deleted from this post earlier). But his "Moods" disc is better.

@lorenzopinto7948

2 жыл бұрын

Actually, the music that is heard at 8:00 and 11:50 is ITALIAN. 😉 The piece is called "Amore grande, amore libero" (Great love, free love) and was composed by "Il Guardiano del Faro" (The lighthouse keeper) stage name of one of the first Italian virtuoso of the moog: Federico Monti Arduini, in 1975... 😉 You can find it on KZread, it's an amazing instrumental prog piece...

@goddam3606

2 жыл бұрын

@@lorenzopinto7948 and what about 13:47 to 15:04 ???

Фантастика, даже с высоты сегодняшнего времени...

@user-rq2lw5hw8b

Жыл бұрын

Не даже,а именно для нынешнего времени

случай, когда прошлое значительно круче будущего.

@demkad3629

Жыл бұрын

АГА АЛИСА ВЕРНИ МЕНЯ В ПРОШЛОЕ

@user-uy5wp4pn9t

Жыл бұрын

Это точно.

5:14 hardware in the loop testing. 1400 landing scenario tested with various failures. Environment modeling computer used motors to apply modeled loads on aero surfaces. 😎 7:43 final landing system was tested by multiple automatic landing of Tu-154.😎 8:50 countdown computer noticed component failure and stopped countdown on 29 October, saving mission.😎 10:54 20000 parameter is being monitored on ascent. 😎 14:53 precise landing only 1.5 meters from designated point😎

@EgorAfonin

2 жыл бұрын

Им надо весь ролик перевести)

@hrissan

2 жыл бұрын

@@EgorAfonin ну обратились бы я бы перевёл. А так я перевёл несколько роликов про космическую технику и выложил у себя на канале, но получил страйки за нарушение авторского права😾, пришлось убрать.

@EgorAfonin

2 жыл бұрын

@@hrissan не справедливо!

@Phenx

2 жыл бұрын

@@hrissan thats so bad :( wish I knew russian to understand what is being said in the video

Знали бы они когда докладывали Горбачёву об успехе, что именно Горбачёв остановит программу.

@siniyden

2 жыл бұрын

дак не тянула страна эту программу

Спасибо за а видео, спасибо всем кто принимал участие в этой грандиозной работе. Но сейчас без комка в горле смотреть на это очень больно...

@TheKostyan4eg

Жыл бұрын

Больно смотреть. Сколько людей старалось, надеелось....

@user-oc6so8er2s

Жыл бұрын

А зачем вообще это делали? Какой смысл? В итоге даже богатые американцы отказались от своих дорогущих шатлов. А сейчас вообще Маск придумал возвращать секции ракет назад на Землю, сделав их многоразовыми

@alexanderyashin9114

Жыл бұрын

@@user-oc6so8er2s Смысл заключался в следующем: 1 Для выполнения задач в космосе и из космоса нужен мощный носитель и наши умы инженеры его сделали; 2 Энергия могла помимо Бурана выводить на низкую околоземную орбиту и более крупные сигменты будущих орбитальных станций стыковать их на орбите и продолжать дальнейшее освоение космического пространства (заниматься научной работой и т д ) ; 3 Сама система Энергия - Буран толкнула науку и технологию далеко вперед* ведь сколько было создано нового в материаловедении* системе управления ЛА* в технологии и производственном сегменте сколько вдохновила людей эта программа* у человечества реально могла осуществиться мечта увидеть землю с высоты 200 км; 4 Возвращать с орбиты на землю КА в будущем уже не имело смысла ремонт мог пройти непосредственно на орбите и т д А про Иллона ничего не буду писать это вся его затея просто пшик и не более

@user-oo7xy9el7l

Жыл бұрын

@@user-oc6so8er2s пфффф, подрастешь - поймешь.

@vp6087

Жыл бұрын

@@alexanderyashin9114 Які ваші, урка? Яким ви боком до виробів українців Корольова, Глушко і Лозіно-Лозінського?

Он прекрасен! Наследие великого народа!

@pavelky3237

Жыл бұрын

Даже и это не смогли сохранить как памятник

@user-ex8qx2vr5v

11 ай бұрын

Наследие великого народа, прежде чем писать такое подумайте хоть не много тем что осталось в голове, только и говорите о каком-то величии, это было сделано в союзе, без союза лучше скажите что вы сделали...

An amazing display of aeronautical engineering. Thanks so much for posting. Although my Russian language is a little rusty, it is interesting to hear it. Too bad that due to economic situation at the time, the entire reusable orbiter program was cancelled. It could have been used to hoist up heavier and larger loads to the ISS that took the US shuttle more trips with less cargo. Excellent orbital test flight. Not many go as planned on the first attempt.

@joe92

Жыл бұрын

It's an amazing display of industrial espionage.

@flonkplonk1649

Жыл бұрын

⁠​⁠​⁠@@joe92 hmmm, the NSA and CIA are known to be the largest industrial espionage agencies ever existed..

@goodgood9955

11 ай бұрын

Copied from NASA.

@flonkplonk1649

11 ай бұрын

@@goodgood9955 "copied" just because of the look?

@ClonedOriginals

10 ай бұрын

@@goodgood9955 The same NASA that was run by fascist German "immigrants" 😇

A beautiful machine, fully automatic flight was an amazing feat, no one had done it with a space shuttle before. Buran even had some parameters better than the American space shuttle.

@XenoghostTV

Ай бұрын

The 100-ton payload claim is absolute bollocks. The Buran's cargo bay visibly wasn't anywhere near the size required to outperform the Shuttle's in cargo capacity.

@MiG-25IsGOAT

25 күн бұрын

@@XenoghostTV lol what are you talking about? you just listened 100 tons and then you say the buran lifted that, 100 tons was the payload of the *Energia alone*, with buran, indeed 30 tons

@904jagzsuck5

7 күн бұрын

Too bad that like any Russian endeavor It never saw fruitation. The Soviets were masters of building ONE of a high tech item, but never having the money nor infrastructure to mass produce. Soviets haven't mass produced anything with success since the T34.

I wasn't aware it ever flew. So good to see!

@tednelson5277

2 жыл бұрын

It was an un-crewed flight and made 2 orbits. November 15, 1988

@JamesNoBrakes

2 жыл бұрын

They also put turbojet engines on it to do flight testing, there are vid segments from that in this video.

@zeom76

2 жыл бұрын

I remember it. It did, fully automatic flight.

@HeidenLam

2 жыл бұрын

@@JamesNoBrakes Finally somebody

@6:34 I never knew the Buran could be fitted with 4 jet engines and flown like a regular plane. @8:30 wow...look at that rig to rotate the whole thing vertical.

@manuelbeltranvalle

2 жыл бұрын

That part made my jaw drop. This is possible because there were no main engines on Buran.

@threehead99

2 жыл бұрын

@@manuelbeltranvalle but because of Soviet espionage yo get the plans for the shuttle, there are still mounts and holes in the air frame to fit the main engines onto the orbiter.

@ljubomirculibrk4097

2 жыл бұрын

You thought the Soviets where amatuers? They did industrial espionage just like the rest no more no less, US did to. But they had good engenieres

@threehead99

2 жыл бұрын

@@ljubomirculibrk4097 no one said the US didn't. Acting like the Soviets had made something incredible and never done before by stealing is what Soviet apologists don't understand.

@vitalegvitalegov

2 жыл бұрын

Initail design was to mount 2 atmospheric engines from Su-27. While U.S. has airfields all around the globe, USSR had no, and the only chance to fly to the USSR territory in case of accident was to use airplane engines. Though before the first flight those engines was not ready and they were dismounted. And for developing a landing sequence (including autopilot) there were just added 2 additional engines. So pilots could takeoff from the ground, without need to use some bigger plane, like Boeing 747 in American programme.

Настоящие технологии по последнему слову техники тех времен!

@aur485

2 жыл бұрын

да и по сегодняшнему.

@MlLKMAN

Жыл бұрын

Copied from America

@user-jn3cg7jt9t

Жыл бұрын

@@MlLKMAN Концепция челнока, остальное свое, это теперь либерасты довели, что все китайское

@user-fw5vz8wq3m

Жыл бұрын

​@@user-jn3cg7jt9t и чем это "своё" было лучше американского ?Америкаские ускорители возращались на землю двигатели первой ступени возращались вместе с челноком ,тупой и дорогой савецкий косплей как и вся совковая техника и наука🤮

@ovgogolev7453

Жыл бұрын

@@user-jn3cg7jt9t а в Китае правит коммунистическая партия. Слава Коммунистической партии Китая! Позор ЕДРу!

Столько сил, денег, труда!!! Создали отличный корабль и все это пошло прахом, коту под хвост! Обидно до слез!

@doom2d

10 ай бұрын

часть технологий, созданных в его производстве ушли в военную авиацию. Да и инженеры, всё это создававшие потом ещё где-то работали и применяли накопленные знания. Так что какое-то наследие у проекта всё-таки было.

@gargantuan-wb1br

10 ай бұрын

​@@doom2dну он верно написал, всё пошло в прах. А если что то ещё и на военные нужды, то это даже в минус.

Чувство стыда сейчас, вместо чувства гордости тогда.

@meytv5691

Жыл бұрын

холодильники Саратов производятся в китае.

Pity Russia did not continue the Buran program. The engineers and Russia deserved the success of the Buran concept. Thanks for sharing.

@Youchubeswindon

2 жыл бұрын

Russian engineers hated the stolen shuttle designs, and could make head nor tail of the reason it was designed like it was, kremlin and military thought the shuttle was a weapon, engineers thought it was stupid. Shuttle was a travesty of politics, committee thought and non-direction kept alive through pride. The Russian engineers made considerable changes to make Buran and they ended up with what exists in this video, but after landing they convinced the leaders of what they had already realised it was way too expensive to launch, could not be rapidly refurbished, was surpassed in cargo lift by other rockets and surpassed in human safety potential by soyuz. The only thing the US shuttle was any better at than anything before was on-orbit repair, but is massively worse on every other metric due to compromise caused by Nasa fighting for budget. Buran tried to resolve some of these issues but lipstick on a pig, and you still have a pig. Nasa knew before the first launch how bad shuttle was compared to the initial proposals, Airforce supported first few launches, and sort of gave up, doing only a handful of launches over its lifetime rather than the proposed 10's per year, and everyone realised it was a dead duck well before it killed it's first crew. Shuttle / Buran looks like an awesome idea, and millions where inspired by it, but it was a fundamentally flawed design. I am glad that they gave up on Buran, but would have preferred them to develop one of the early shuttle concepts (DC3), which still used the piggyback design, was smaller, and had glide recoverable fuel tank / first stage, and used it as a dedicated hls as replacement to soyuz.

@AM-zk7pj

Жыл бұрын

Because it was simply not practical.... They choose what was better for their needs

@netyimeni169

Жыл бұрын

Russia was barely able to continue exist at the time

@purple.requiem

4 ай бұрын

​@@Youchubeswindon another redditor pseudo intellectual who just wants to piss on the glorious Soviet legacy.

«Да, были люди в наше время, не то, что нынешнее племя!»

@iachelovek-ib8rw

Жыл бұрын

"богатыри не вы"

@user-uo6nd4pl5m

Жыл бұрын

Буран 'внес большой вклад в пэрэстройку' меченой гниды, а его будущие пилоты - космонавты так и не увидели впп , как увидел ее робот пилот Бурана

Уважение,радость,гордость за создателей-конструкторов,всех участников проекта,за Советский Союз,государство!

Это был красивый космический корабль. Как жаль, что его никогда не использовали регулярно.

@sidhantseth007

2 жыл бұрын

indeed

@socium2000

2 жыл бұрын

Его бы использовали, но тогда шли в другое "светлое" будущее.

@sidhantseth007

2 жыл бұрын

@@socium2000 USSR would have to eventually collapse. It would been a better counterbalance to US than China.

@socium2000

2 жыл бұрын

@@sidhantseth007 Коммунистическая политически-экономическая система, это то с чем человечество всей планеты придёт к светлому будущему. А Капитализм, это то, что обогатит нескольких людей планеты.

@valdemarvaldemar4725

2 жыл бұрын

@@socium2000 вам срочно к врачу.

Buran is a real masterpiece of engineering. Shame she is sleeping in a garbage.

13:36 - background music playing during Buran landing is taken from Soviet vinyl of 1980 "The Metamorphoses" which were collected electronic reworkings of classical music pieces, this specific composition is synthesiser version of "Sarcasms" for piano by Sergey Prokofiev.

@bee2k01

2 жыл бұрын

What about the music at around 7:59?

@ORMA1

Жыл бұрын

​@@bee2k01 kzread.info/dash/bejne/mH-Gl82ylqathLA.html Regards👋🇮🇹

@dmitrilebedev8635

10 ай бұрын

@@bee2k01 Must be something by Eduard Artemyev. There are collections of his recordings on KZread (I don't post a link, because such messages often get deleted)

@nhhfdyhvdfghh

4 ай бұрын

Спасибо!

El Buran fue increíble, el único transbordador capaz de aterrizar de forma automática sin pilotos

@JIUNnF

10 ай бұрын

А сегодня дети беспилотниками убивают других детей.

Automatic landing 40 years before SpaceX!

@jshepard152

2 жыл бұрын

Not powered landing. Not remotely similar.

@neplatnyudaj110

2 жыл бұрын

Planes were landed automatically since 60s.

@jshepard152

2 жыл бұрын

@@neplatnyudaj110 Planes don't travel six or seven times faster than a rifle bullet, nor do they leave earth's atmosphere.

@neplatnyudaj110

2 жыл бұрын

@@jshepard152 Point being? Once the orbiter survives reentry, it's just a (pretty crappy) plane.

@stargazer7644

2 жыл бұрын

The first Space Shuttle could also land itself. The landing gear deployment was the only thing that needed a human, and that was done for political reasons to require a pilot be on board. After the Columbia accident they even automated that switch so that an orbiter could be land itself with no one on board in the event of a crew evacuation.

Просто представьте какой объем работ проделан, сколько затрачен ресурсов. Сейчас олигархи кровососы соревнуются в размере и стоимости яхты на народные деньги

@denizzzka

2 жыл бұрын

"Буран" и Чернобыль это как раз из ряда тех вещей, которые похоронили СССР

@sportford75

Жыл бұрын

Царь то хороший , а бояре у нас плохие, царь то у нас не знает что бояре грабят воруют врут и вывозят из страны триллионы рублей, он и зарплату то СВОю не считает, ему приносят чемоданы а он складывается в тумбочке. 😂😊😮 Страна непуганых идиотов.

Как будто это было вчера. Посчастливилось и старт и посадку наблюдать

Unfortunate they didn't continue their program. It's a very interesting bit of history that would surprise most people I think. People who never knew, and still don't. Nice footage.

Great video, would be nice to have a translation. I was particularly interested to see the jet powered trainer / test article, also the horizontal stacking.

@cplcabs

2 жыл бұрын

Just press the translate button then settings and choose which language you want. Its easy.

@skunkjobb

2 жыл бұрын

@@cplcabs I did and it works OK. Of course not a perfect translation but at least so you can understand most parts.

@cplcabs

2 жыл бұрын

@@skunkjobb yeah, auto translate still has a way to go

The video has made huge progress since that time.........Imagine this Buran flight with today's images....

Его полёт был первый и единственный, как печально

Подобное было возможно в той - ВЕЛИКОЙ СТРАНЕ! В современных владениях удельных князьков-воров, нечто подобное создать нереально. Слава Советской Стране!

@dooshman13

2 жыл бұрын

в США такие шатлы летали с 1981-го года...причём летали регулярно....может дело не удельных князьях,а в рабском умишке дебилов советских?

@alextrunin4927

Жыл бұрын

100%!

@MrSuiting

Жыл бұрын

Абсолютно точно! Вывод? Нужно все менять опять!

@sportford75

Жыл бұрын

Царь то хороший , а бояре у нас плохие, царь то у нас не знает что бояре грабят воруют врут и вывозят из страны триллионы рублей, он и зарплату то СВОю не считает, ему приносят чемоданы а он складывается в тумбочке. 😂😊😮 Страна непуганых идиотов.

amazing footage. tragic the orbiters were not preserved. a loss to all humanity

@MrTomasekk

3 жыл бұрын

Not quite true. Watch this: kzread.info/dash/bejne/X6VrvLiRf7iZm7A.html

@vmfox2152

2 жыл бұрын

...or just visit the musuem in Speyer (germany): speyer.technik-museum.de/en/spaceshuttle-buran

@jenrichardson1941

2 жыл бұрын

Options, go to Baikonur in Kazakhstan or a museum..

@904jagzsuck5

7 күн бұрын

Really? What exactly have you lost due to this? Are you not aware that the US had a shuttle program FAR more advanced that actually FLEW COUNTLESS MISSIONS?

Артефакт развитой цивилизации. На кадре, где 3М разворачивается с Бураном на спине, дыхание перехватывает.

Excellent & informative video. Great camera work, thanks, Ted.

I did not know this footage existed. Thank you for posting. Would have loved to see at least one crewed mission.

@user-oq4uj9vf6j

Жыл бұрын

С экипажем он не летал. Но не исключается на перспективу: остались 4 летных корабля (степень готовности: один -- 100% (Буря), второй 50% (Байкал), остальные примерно от 10 до 30%). Один на Байконуре, три на Тушинском заводе и в Жуковском. Есть еще полноразмерные летные (но только в атмосфере) макеты (один из них - на ВДНХ).

This program should not have been scrapped. What a magnificent achievement in spaceflight. A true heavy cargo spaceplane.

@ftswarbill

Жыл бұрын

*You talk like it was their original Idea and that they didn't steal 100% of it off the USA. They couldn't steal everything and it went belly up. Russia is a terrible country unless you like corruption and Communism.* 🤔

@Rubensgardens.Skogsmuseum

Жыл бұрын

Rumours say that NASA tried to revive it.

@ftswarbill

Жыл бұрын

@@Rubensgardens.Skogsmuseum *Utter horse shit.*

@bradstewart7007

Жыл бұрын

Our death trap of a shuttle probably should have been scrapped, though. It's fascinating to watch a new golden age with the NASA-SpaceX partnership.

@624radicalham

Жыл бұрын

Here's a copy and paste from another comment addressing your comment .. Russian engineers hated the stolen shuttle designs, and could make head nor tail of the reason it was designed like it was, kremlin and military thought the shuttle was a weapon, engineers thought it was stupid. Shuttle was a travesty of politics, committee thought and non-direction kept alive through pride. The Russian engineers made considerable changes to make Buran and they ended up with what exists in this video, but after landing they convinced the leaders of what they had already realised it was way too expensive to launch, could not be rapidly refurbished, was surpassed in cargo lift by other rockets and surpassed in human safety potential by soyuz. The only thing the US shuttle was any better at than anything before was on-orbit repair, but is massively worse on every other metric due to compromise caused by Nasa fighting for budget. Buran tried to resolve some of these issues but lipstick on a pig, and you still have a pig. Nasa knew before the first launch how bad shuttle was compared to the initial proposals, Airforce supported first few launches, and sort of gave up, doing only a handful of launches over its lifetime rather than the proposed 10's per year, and everyone realised it was a dead duck well before it killed it's first crew. Shuttle / Buran looks like an awesome idea, and millions where inspired by it, but it was a fundamentally flawed design. I am glad that they gave up on Buran, but would have preferred them to develop one of the early shuttle concepts (DC3), which still used the piggyback design, was smaller, and had glide recoverable fuel tank / first stage, and used it as a dedicated hls as replacement to soyuz.

6:38 I love the idea of using jet engines to propel a shuttle

@christianbenzinger770

2 жыл бұрын

That was only for Flighttest. The Buran was much more Safer den the US Shuttel. First the have NO Dangerus Solidfule Booster. The can Abbort the Engine everytime. Up to Mach 1 The Have Ejectorseats for the Crew. AND The Buran can Land without any Pilot! The first and last Flight was VOLL Automatik with no one a Bord. The Buran in my Eyes had be the better Shuttle.

@Bad666Moon

2 жыл бұрын

@@christianbenzinger770 saying it was safer than the us shuttle is very speculative with almost no real data to back it up. While the space shuttle obviously had some catastrophic failures, there’s no real way to know or prove the Russian version was better or worse because of it’s very limited amount of flight time compared to the us shuttle.

@xponen

2 жыл бұрын

@@Bad666Moon we can extrapolate from Soyuz, the design from that era that still work. The thing is Soyuz is safe because it had abort options, and Buran has those too, which don't exist in Space Shuttle, meaning if the launch fail (ie: like Challenger) there's no fatality (ie: using ejection seat or booster shutdown) and the excuses in politics that cancel Space Shuttle is going to be minimal, and Buran can launch without cosmonaut, meaning if it fail to re-entry (ie: like Columbia) after deploying a satellite won't be a big news.

@christianbenzinger770

2 жыл бұрын

@@Bad666Moon You're absolutly right. But more security has been thought of than with the US shuttle. And in principle it is just a further developed space shuttle since, as is well known, the plans were stolen. Solid bosters are too risky in my opinion. Liquid thrusters can always be turned off. You could certainly have retrofitted ejection seats on the US shuttle. But there is also the danger that they can be accidentally triggered in weightlessness. In addition, they are only helpful for the first few moments at the start. But they have just given a little more thought to security.

@ZaHandle

2 жыл бұрын

@@christianbenzinger770 Fun fact: The first space shuttle had ejection seats too bad that one is only for ground use

Absolutely amazing : a fully automated flight; far more advanced than anything at the time. It is very very sad that this was abandoned after the great success 😪😪😪😪Love from India!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

@edwardmartinez9459

Жыл бұрын

You guy's forget the USA built them and worked them the cost was to high.

@ftswarbill

Жыл бұрын

*They blame the cancellation on the economic downturn of Communism but the fact was that they couldn't copy everything, Their lack of technology made them mothball this stolen Idea, India also steals a lot of technology and suffers much more failures than most as we have seen. Don't get me wrong, at least they try. There is a reason why companies like SpaceX will always dominate and always be in America.* 😃👍

@MSM5500

Жыл бұрын

"far more advanced than anything at the time" Bullshit you say, babu. At that time the US had a Space Shuttle program fully up and running for 10 years already, where as the "Buran" program was just a "cargo cult" prototype at a very crude stage. The Buran program was a failed attempt of Soviet regime to showcase their capabilities and advantage which didn't exist. Soviet regime got hernia from this and other useless demonstrations they did to the world yet collapsed and passed away as expected. The Buran project is just a pure example of a simulacrum where symbols substitute the real sense of things.

@ILSRWY4

Жыл бұрын

The American Shuttles were fully automated too and if need could land fully on their own. In fact they were (and still are) the most advanced and complicated machines ever built.

@joe92

Жыл бұрын

Not more advanced than anything at the time.

ан-225 мрия создавалась далеко не как транспортное средство для бурана и топливных баков, основное назначение перспективного самолёта - программа "молния", т.е. взлёт прямо с летящего самолёта на максимальной высоте.

@Gibraltar000

2 жыл бұрын

Мрия никогда не создавалась как стартовая площадка для запуска космических аппаратов, для этих целей были начаты предпроектные разработки Ан 325 а так же исследования в создании нового челнока так как сам Буран не мог самостоятельно взлетать по причине отсутствия разгонных двигателей...

@Gibraltar000

2 жыл бұрын

Кстати на видео не Мрия а ВМ-Т «Атлант» ,но он был узкофюзеляжным поэтому и было принято решение о создании широкофюзеляжного самолёта

@dendevis4331

2 жыл бұрын

@@Gibraltar000 я знаю что это вм-т и не говорил, что на видео находится мрия.

Это история которую ни кто и ни когда не вычеркнит!! Аплодисменты всему человечеству👍 СССР это мошь☝️ Америке спасибо за вызов🤝

До слёз...😢

Buran is when you let someone copy your homework but he does it so good the teacher suspect you of copying him

@flynnpury

2 жыл бұрын

lmao nice the buran wasn’t good bro.

@ZaHandle

2 жыл бұрын

@@flynnpury somewhat better than the space shuttle still not the best

Incredible.....fascinating to see a jet powered test version....Never heard of this development.

Gotta love the state-approved version of “the final countdown”

@christopherneufelt8971

2 жыл бұрын

They resurrected Lenin for the VideoClip!

@RideAcrossTheRiver

2 жыл бұрын

I hope Europe got a royalty!

@MomentalnoVMore

2 жыл бұрын

@@RideAcrossTheRiver i think no ^_^

@dmitrilebedev8635

2 жыл бұрын

There was no single & monolithic "state" in the USSR, it was as everywhere: lots of state agencies, with their own agenda and people's tastes or sense of what's "appropriate". There were no formal bans on any kind or title of foreign music, just approval/disapproval to re-publish locally, which was decided by art approval boards. By 1988 such boards were not working, for Perestroyka policy (started in 1987). Most of video editors or anyone at the age of 15-40 were fond of Western music, no matter what was their ideology. The most ironic example is "International Panorama" TV program (search KZread Международная панорама 1988), the most distilled anti-Western propaganda, yet its intro music was American rock.

One of the Burans (with the jet engines) used to be in a park on Sydney Harbour about 20 years ago. No joke, I used to eat my lunch underneath it. Edit: its name is OK-GLI

What a fascinating find - thanks for posting this historical document.

Amazing! Good work on bring this back!

@user-xz8ys9kb9g

3 жыл бұрын

Еслиб катастрофически неграбелся буджэт страны мыбы былеб вкосмосе .

@hipnotycznaegosymulacja9569

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-xz8ys9kb9g www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/790210-space-shuttle-endeavour-console.html Space Shuttle Endeavour USA vs. Russia Buran pl.depositphotos.com/181120302/stock-photo-girl-looks-at-cabin-of.html 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

@liondecka9062

2 жыл бұрын

Russia, and China, our copy and paste nations 👎

@shoora813

2 жыл бұрын

STS is a piece of garbage for niche use. Unfortunately, Soviet decided to make proportional response - with the same niche use. Simply because originally STS had military purpose as well as civilian. By the way, STS was actually used by Pentagon in several missions.

@shoora813

2 жыл бұрын

@@liondecka9062 This exactly why NASA is now copying soviet Spiral spaceplane. And F-35 is based on MiG-1.44. And illegal copies of AK-47 still produced in US of A, but not in Russia (after 1974)

13:40 - Сердце сжалось от этих слов :(

@lapistaoftheparadise4627

2 жыл бұрын

What the fuck are you saying

@EgorAfonin

2 жыл бұрын

@@lapistaoftheparadise4627 "... и вот сейчас мы видим посадку Бурана, с места будущих пилотов"

@comand8398

2 жыл бұрын

@@EgorAfonin Мне кажется он не понял, при чем тут сердце, и почему оно сжалось

@ivanovolgovich1382

2 жыл бұрын

"не видать мне новых джинсов и колбасы" - подумал диктор

@EgorAfonin

2 жыл бұрын

@@ivanovolgovich1382 , зато сейчас с синтетичечкой колбасой 40 сортов и в ддинсах, которых на пол года хватает, но уже не диктор....

Вот такие вот галоши были. Зато теперь колбаса у всех есть. Жаль, не из мяса.

@user-bf9rh8ml9i

2 жыл бұрын

из мяса!

@user-kc5qb5sg7m

2 жыл бұрын

колбасы и тогда было полно

@siniyden

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-kc5qb5sg7m за которой ездили в москву

@user-kc5qb5sg7m

2 жыл бұрын

@@siniyden долго ждал знаменитого "ЗА КОЛБАСОЙ НА ЭЛЕКТРИЧКЕ" )))) еще ты забыл туалетная бумага телевизор пол года в очереди и ну допиши сам ))))

@user-kc5qb5sg7m

2 жыл бұрын

@@siniyden а вспомнил 10500 трилиардов расстреляных в ГУЛАКе))))НКВД репрессии голодоиор))))

Another amazing achievement. Pulling it around with basic equipment, barge, tractor, transport on small jet not much bigger than shuttle, and then it flew to space. I never knew that.

2:50 Typical Russian take-off: "How much runway we have left?" "None" "Hokay, rotate"

@Hyperious_in_the_air

2 жыл бұрын

the state paid for all the runway, so you use all the runway!

@frodosadventures8757

2 жыл бұрын

I think it is so sad that it only flew once, before the whole program was canceled. All that hard work, money, all that use of incredably smart minds, which all came to nothing. Even more sad is the fact that the first flight was such a raging success, it was all done automated, and in some ways it was possibly better than the US shuttle . Then the shuttles and boosters were left abandoned, and mostly destroyed when the hanger collapsed. So sad, it all should be in museums!

@JOEM747

2 жыл бұрын

@@frodosadventures8757 The two Burans are still okay, it's the energia rocket where the hangar collapsed.

@dmitrilebedev8635

2 жыл бұрын

There's a whole half a kilometer left.

@dumpsterstu4474

2 жыл бұрын

That takeoff was crazy as well. Like did it blow up was it OK? WAS IT A TINY NUCLEAR 💣 oh no there it is.

Низкий поклон советским специалистам.

Какие светлые и счастливые люди! И это всё исчезло и никогда ничего подобного не будет...

@alextrunin4927

Жыл бұрын

когда-нибудь будет... Но нам не суждено это будет лицезреть.

@eliaslorsen2941

Жыл бұрын

@@alextrunin4927 Не будет, мозги массово уезжают за границу. Население замещают приезжими, порядка 1 млн в год.

I love how Russians seem to always think outside the square

Amazing document of space race from Cold War. Historic

@toomanyhobbies2011

2 жыл бұрын

Take it with a grain of salt, this is just Soviet propaganda.

@MomentalnoVMore

2 жыл бұрын

@@toomanyhobbies2011 Buran Energya is real product, not propaganda.

@scienceium5233

2 жыл бұрын

@@toomanyhobbies2011 flatearther detected

Sadly this orbiter was destroyed in 2002 when the roof ceiling collapsed where it was stored in Kazakhstan. Meanwhile the other 2 prototypes are still there stored in Bikenor launch facility in Kazakhstan where they have been left to rust. Buran could have replaced NASA's space shuttle soon after it was retired. Buran could have been used to transport essential supplies to the international space station.

It’s amazing that Buran had in theory more capabilities than the space shuttle.

Great flight! Film I'd never seen before. And - THE FINAL COUNTDOWN! EPIC!

It was a time of advanced civilization

Love the B-52-style Мясищев ВМ with the 4 Turbojets.

for people using the CC subtittles: Buran means Blizzard in English. That's why the auto-translate keeps saying Blizzard this blizzard that.

Буран, спроектировали и построили в Москве в Тушино, на ТМЗ (скоро там вместо завода, всё застроят домами-человейниками). Вывозили его из цеха и везли по широкой улице Лодочная (специально расширяли в 80х, чтобы Буран отвезти до причала и погрузить на баржу). Главный конструктор; Глеб Лозино-Лозинский, жил недалеко на улице Свободы 61к1. Он есть в этом видео на 15 мин.19 сек. До сих пор, никто из верховных и местных властей, не установили на доме памятную табличку в его честь.

Just so you know, the thumbnail is AeroBuran, not Buran. Look it up, very interesting craft in its own right.

When I was in Moscow in 2005 one of them was on display in Gorky Park. It was playground equipment. Literally. Ladders up to the interior and slippery slides down to the sand. Interestingly their shuttle could carry a heavier payload to a higher altitude than ours, and was much cheaper to operate. Whether it would have done so safely is something we'll never know, but ours failed catastrophically 2 times out of 135 flights. A horrific safety record. And if we're being honest with ourselves our shuttle never once did what it was designed to do. Nor COULD it even if we'd wanted. It was sold as a reusable vehicle to place communication satellites and to retrieve them for repair. But geosynchronous-orbit comsats are 24,000 miles up. Our shuttle could only manage 500 or so with a heavy payload, thanks to bloated engineering. And by the time it flew the cost of comsats had dropped to the point that servicing them was no longer needed. They're just thrown away. That left our shuttle as a massive make-work project and political boondoggle in search of a mission. Remember all those "secret military missions" it did for a while? Those were just spy satellites. Congress forced the Air Force to use the shuttle instead of their own proven rockets in order to justify its continued operation. Other payloads, such as the Hubble, were inefficiently designed to fit into the the shuttle's cargo bay. ("All the eggs in one basket"......horribly expensive and unreliable.) And now.....we're begging rides from the Russians, using their 1960s technology. 'murica!

@ksmashgamer5748

2 жыл бұрын

The United States now primarily uses SpaceX Crew Dragon and upcoming Boeing Starliner for LEO astronaut travel?

@jerromedrakejr9332

2 жыл бұрын

@@ksmashgamer5748 The United States has extended the agreement with Russia on the production on the US soil and use of Russian RD engines until at least 2030, with the estimate that by then they will be able to start the production of domestic engines, so America will have to rely on the Russians for at least another decade.

@stargazer7644

2 жыл бұрын

Ok, someone has to call you on your bloviating. The payload limits and cost to operate were never demonstrated because the Buran never flew a single operational flight. The original cost projections per flight for the Shuttle were pretty rosy too. 2 failures in 135 flights is hardly a "horrific safety record" in spaceflight. Spaceflight is dangerous. Soyuz has had far more failures over its history. The Shuttle absolutely did what it was designed to do. Whether that design was the best one is up for debate, but the shuttle launched many satellites, and it brought two of them back for repair. It repaired satellites in orbit as well. It built a space station. It performed countless long duration science missions. Shuttle was never intended to fly to geosync orbit, I don't know where you got that idea. You might as well complain that it didn't fly to the Moon. The Hubble was inefficiently designed? Based on what? The design of the Hubble was based on those military spy satellites. Perhaps you've been living under a rock for a while, but America has always had multiple vehicles to launch spacecraft into orbit, and we've had manned launch vehicles for nearly a year now. Soon to be multiple manned vehicles. Did you bitch this much during the gap between Apollo and the Shuttle too? But what do you expect from someone who can't tell a real spacecraft from a model in a park.

@stargazer7644

2 жыл бұрын

@@jerromedrakejr9332 One US rocket uses Russian RD engines, the Atlas. We have other launch platforms.

@zoom112358

2 жыл бұрын

@@jerromedrakejr9332 There is a not insignificant geopolitical, social, and technical benefit to using those engines. Cooperation between Russian and American space enterprises has been a hallmark of peace for the past thirty years. It's not a bad thing to play nice. It helps everyone not wake up dead in the morning.

Вот поэтому нас разрушили, разъединили, а теперь лбами сталкивают! Какая же мощная, сильная, развитая была моя Родина....СЛАВА СССР

I remember it well, what a shame it never flew again.

Love to see if Russia reveive its Buran shuttle program again.... amazing technology achievement in that time.... bravo russian engineers and cosmonauts.....

@624radicalham

Жыл бұрын

Here's a copy and paste from another comment addressing your comment .. Russian engineers hated the stolen shuttle designs, and could make head nor tail of the reason it was designed like it was, kremlin and military thought the shuttle was a weapon, engineers thought it was stupid. Shuttle was a travesty of politics, committee thought and non-direction kept alive through pride. The Russian engineers made considerable changes to make Buran and they ended up with what exists in this video, but after landing they convinced the leaders of what they had already realised it was way too expensive to launch, could not be rapidly refurbished, was surpassed in cargo lift by other rockets and surpassed in human safety potential by soyuz. The only thing the US shuttle was any better at than anything before was on-orbit repair, but is massively worse on every other metric due to compromise caused by Nasa fighting for budget. Buran tried to resolve some of these issues but lipstick on a pig, and you still have a pig. Nasa knew before the first launch how bad shuttle was compared to the initial proposals, Airforce supported first few launches, and sort of gave up, doing only a handful of launches over its lifetime rather than the proposed 10's per year, and everyone realised it was a dead duck well before it killed it's first crew. Shuttle / Buran looks like an awesome idea, and millions where inspired by it, but it was a fundamentally flawed design. I am glad that they gave up on Buran, but would have preferred them to develop one of the early shuttle concepts (DC3), which still used the piggyback design, was smaller, and had glide recoverable fuel tank / first stage, and used it as a dedicated hls as replacement to soyuz.

The most fascinating part of the video is that they attached modular jet engines to it and it was able to take off and fly under its own power. To my knowledge, they never did that with the American space shuttle.

Sad to know it sits abandoned and rotting away now. Great video coverage of this.

@max-pd3oo

2 жыл бұрын

The blizzard (buran) from the video was blown up during repair work roof in his garage, the tool fell from a height on his oxygen tank and an explosion occurred. it was be full destroy Right now there are two burans left, these are just models and not flight samples. Russpace say that a new "blizzard" is already being built and it will be better.

When mom buys Megablocks instead of LEGO.

@ecurb10

2 жыл бұрын

Ahaha...that's good!🤣

@nucleardonuts7028

2 жыл бұрын

@@SkyInfirmaryЧувак, инженер ты хренов, подучи английский

@ropersonline

2 жыл бұрын

And then the Megablocks assemble themselves all by themselves, which a somewhat distant relative of LEGO doesn't do until decades if not generations later.

@vilmospalik1480

2 жыл бұрын

they get the space shuttle

@julianmccallum8812

2 жыл бұрын

Underrated comment

It's a real shame that it was abandoned due to collapse of the Soviet Union. They should revive the program, it would be much mora advance with modern computers and new optimizoation algorithms and ai. It would be useful for building space stations or reparing the ISS:

@executivesteps

2 жыл бұрын

Every segment of the ISS that was built by Russia was launched on an expendable launch vehicle. Why would you need a shuttle to deliver any part of it.

@xponen

2 жыл бұрын

@@executivesteps if you look at picture of Space Shuttle docked to MIR Russian space station you'd find Space Shuttle is as large as a space station. A Space Shuttle can carry big component for a larger space station.

@TheJer1963

2 жыл бұрын

They are still setting in a hanger in Russia now. Pretty much is free to go in it too. People have pretty much stripped everything of them now. There is a video here on KZread showing 3 kids going in the hanger then going aboard one of the shuttles, really bad shape.

@Doggeslife

2 жыл бұрын

That would take many billions in rubles they do not have for spending on it. It's not the powerful Soviet Union anymore.

@bertramspielt

2 жыл бұрын

I saw an original Buran, the only one in the western world, on display at the tech museum in Speyer / Germany. Amazing, to see this thing in reality. Getting into the fright compartment, getting a view into the cockpit and see the structure through a small hatch. Also on display are some downsized prototypes, one burned from the reentry after a spaceflight. The whole exibitions is spectacular many original items from NASA, Roscosmos, ESA and China. For fans: must be seen. The museum tryed to get a US Space Shuttle, but didn't get it - because they show the Buran. America don't want the US one in the near of the Russian shuttle... This museum is connected with a second one in the near, the tech museum in Sinsheim - famous for the TU144 and Concorde on display.

это ведь всё ещё единственный полностью автоматический полет

@vitoattwood7847

2 жыл бұрын

уже давно ракеты летают в полностью автоматическом режиме

@themarsoff

2 жыл бұрын

@@vitoattwood7847 и приземляются сами на указанный участок да?

@Regenerator_

2 жыл бұрын

Ага, конечно))) Загугли "X-37"

@user-bf9rh8ml9i

2 жыл бұрын

@@themarsoff да, посмотри как фальконы от спейс икс не то чтобы в заданном участке, а в заданной точке +-2 метра от размеченного на экране кампуктира центра

@Alisher88888

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-bf9rh8ml9i после выхода в космос? И не сравнивай. 40 лет прошло

so sad with such a great shuttle & booster system they did not launch at least a few more, sending people up with it and actually using the payload compartment would have been so nice to see.

Holy crap that tiny aircraft carrying Buran! I had no idea there was another plane, much smaller than the Ukrainian Antonov An-225 Mriya, carrying Buran.

@ljubomirculibrk4097

2 жыл бұрын

That is not a tiny aircraft, its a strategic bomber

@joyl7842

2 жыл бұрын

@@ljubomirculibrk4097 tiny compared to Mriya

@dmitrilebedev8635

2 жыл бұрын

An-225 completion was delayed, so M3 had to be adapted.

@sundreev

2 жыл бұрын

An-225 was completed before the collapse of Soviet Union so it is "soviet", not "ukrainian". The whole USSR (literally) was developing and building it.

@jerromedrakejr9332

2 жыл бұрын

Did you intentionally emphasize that the Antonov An-225 is Ukrainian or is it a "sincere" mistake?

Science, space exploration, peace, cooperation, friendship, mutual respect, medicine, art, sports, literature etc. Those are the things humans should focus on.

這台太空梭居然可以由地面起飛,太厲害了

@user-sc2je5ke1m

11 ай бұрын

Нет. Но он может самостоятельно садится. На автопилоте.

Юра, мы всё про*бали.....

To all USA pro who thinks Buran is a failure, just keep in mind that the Space Shuttle couldn't be Automated.

@lapistaoftheparadise4627

2 жыл бұрын

And isn't as safe.

@atanasapostolov2731

2 жыл бұрын

@@lapistaoftheparadise4627 there is no data whatsoever that backs this claim.

@jesusramirezromo2037

2 жыл бұрын

@@atanasapostolov2731 Buran didnt have SRBs, or an external foam covered tank Thus, It lacked the two critical points that caused the destruction of 2 shuttles

@atanasapostolov2731

2 жыл бұрын

@@jesusramirezromo2037 That does not mean it was safer. Buran was not a exact copy of the shuttle. It was different structurally therefor you can't just say it was safe due to the 2 things that took shuttles out were removed. I am not saying the Buran was unsafe or a failure. I am saying that there is no flight data to back up the claim that it was safer. We simply don't know as it has only flown once compared to the hundred something shuttle flights.

@cms9902

2 жыл бұрын

And your point is? The whole point is to send people into space to do tasks, that no Buran could ever do. Buran cannot build an ISS, cannot connect different stages and pods together, make external repairs, deliver parts and assemble and so on.

Момент взлёта , как птица феникс рождён из огня!Низкий поклон всем причастным к его созданию от дворников до саго главного человека в этой длинной цепочке

@bradclooney69

9 ай бұрын

Like a massive ejaculation into space