The Abrams was highly lauded by the US because its been winning battles against goat herders for 20+ years.

@guytech7310

Ай бұрын

But it lost to the goat herders with its tail tucked behind its legs in Afghan!

@ConfusedTreeLine-hf3gk

Ай бұрын

Totally agree

@amiralsrbani24

Ай бұрын

Looks the Zionist Jews who own the US Military Complex went Biblical on us by naming the tank Abraham! Shear arrogance ! They killed Abraham now !

@YanniEhm

Ай бұрын

Hey. goat herders can be dangerous. LOL

@nevillereimers6336

Ай бұрын

You can puff your chest out when there’s no opposition America is finding out the hard way they are not the biggest and best when it comes up against someone who can give as good as it gets

I'm quite sure that the T72B3 crew played at least 700+ hours of War Thunder LOL

@MZW-xj7vd

27 күн бұрын

Fr especially targeting the very known weak spot of the Abrams, even a tiger 1 can penetrate the area just under the gun ☠️

@Supersaiyanvegeta72

22 күн бұрын

😂 They also got the steam special on PC for the export version T 72 few months back.

@racistlobsterofficial

22 күн бұрын

700 on war thunder gets you to about BR0.00001

@menzbercedes8962

21 күн бұрын

​@@racistlobsterofficialfor me 300 hours of warthunder . And I'm in rank 8

@Jesse-040

20 күн бұрын

Fr

I don't know why people think the Abrams is indestructible and when it is killed, they insult it so much.. Any tank can be killed, no matter the armor, every tank has it's weak spots... Side shots will kill any tank

@michamichaowski8375

12 күн бұрын

Ukraine got the older M1A1 version stripped of all of its most advanced armor and equipment. They are not M1A2 sep V3

@viethoangtruong54

12 күн бұрын

@@michamichaowski8375 It will all be the same, even the merkava, which is among the best of the best gets rekt by cheap UAV and makeshift RPG warheads.

@michamichaowski8375

12 күн бұрын

@@viethoangtruong54 maybe you are right - for them moment. But there is research made already how to counter that threat. Its like a constant competition between the sword and the shield. It never ends.

@rocket870

11 күн бұрын

Yes I know right.. Wait until they hear about the 23 Abrams destroyed in Afghanistan. Nine of which were destroyed by old Soviet era T-62 tanks and RPG rounds. The T-62 has the capability to run APFSDS but mainly us HE or HESH. The Iraqi army had the base model of T-62s with sandbags and other metal sheets bolted to the turret. The Abrams can take and withstand hits from a T-62 all day any day, but the way HE works is that it just explodes and destroys anything in its path. Most of the time only the barrel, tracks, and thermal sights were destroyed by the HE explosion but the tank itself was either destroyed by friendly fire so no tanks could be captured or destroyed by RPG rounds... seven Abrams were purposely destroyed by U.S troops to prevent the capture of their disabled tanks that could easily be repaired in the matter of a few days to a week

@neilas1630

11 күн бұрын

@@michamichaowski8375 yep and thats why in ww2 tanks advanced so fast because it was constantly trying to advance against the opposite side

Crowing roosters 2022 "Ahahaha flying Russian tanks" Crowing roosters 2024 "No tanks are invulnerable"

Russia is not Afganistan, Iraq or other countries where American troops fought with civilians/ It is another level, higher level of war game

@sbrengard

Ай бұрын

Meanwhile Russia is literally fighting drafted civilians with drafted civilians.

@guytech7310

Ай бұрын

Last I recall, the US left Afghan with its tail tucked between its legs to sandal wearing goat herders. The US has become a bully that targets people that simply cannot fight back. When someone punches them in the nose, the go running ans screaming away. As a american, I can tell you that the US gov't is an embarrassment of epic proportions!

@5arnavi9

Ай бұрын

​@@sbrengardIt means that you admit that Ukraine no longer has soldiers

@mr.r1178

Ай бұрын

​@@sbrengardLike every major war

@toddflynn7156

Ай бұрын

​@@sbrengardWrong, there's no draft, it's volunteer only.

Men those tactical shovels are nastyyyyy

@jnishar

Ай бұрын

they are very lucky to have shovels.. In germany they only have broom sticks!

@user-xe8zj6rc3o

Ай бұрын

@@jnishar 😛

@iceman3577

Ай бұрын

imagine if us or germany havee H&K tactical shovels ... in 1 days russia loose the war but they only have m1 abrams and leo :( @@jnishar

@nemiw4429

Ай бұрын

​@@iceman3577they havent yet used: hypersonic shovels, shovel satelites, T-Shovelty5 Tank, Shovelsub[marine], shovel allround attack & defense weapon made from stalinium with Stalins mustache.

@iceman3577

Ай бұрын

western stuff : chucle im in danger" @@nemiw4429

sending 1 insanly large expensive tank out into a field is a terrible idea

@krazykilljoy7180

10 күн бұрын

They don't necessarily have many options U.S only sent 31 along with their dwindling numbers they gotta make due with what they have and in the grand scheme of things they are using them in a smart way for the most part

@Krystina-UA

10 күн бұрын

We got the tank for free, thanks to US taxpayers 😅 We know how to fight but we have not much choices. Unfortunately material gets destroyed in a war, or do you believe...just roll out some tanks and the war is over? 🤣

@theholypeanut473

10 күн бұрын

You act like the US cares about the tanks cost

@mariobgvoynov2041

9 күн бұрын

They dont send it alone?

@gernhard.reinholdsen

9 күн бұрын

Maus.jpg

Guys tank is a tank, it is not indestructible no matter which nation produced it

@Eagle-eye-pie

14 күн бұрын

The irony being it wasn’t a tank that was destroyed.

@BelugaChonky

12 күн бұрын

Weren't saying that a year ago

@Eagle-eye-pie

12 күн бұрын

@@BelugaChonkywho wasn’t?

@krazykilljoy7180

10 күн бұрын

And people wonder why U.S heavily invested in aircraft and a navy to support it

@RendezvousAtFox-ft2eh

10 күн бұрын

Yeah they are making a big deal out of them destroying an abrams using "only" 1 shell, although pretty much ALL tank duels ends with who gets the first round on target. Real life isnt battlefield 2042 where a tank will take multiple hits. For the most part, tank combat can be reduced to tactics, and what tactics one can use deoends on the tanks abilities like speed and manouverability, aswell as how the battlefield looks and other supporting army branches aswell. DefenseTV is very pro-russian, and along with the majority of their fans, heavily biased in russias favor.

Did the Russian tank ask for the Abrams' preferred pronouns?😢

@NKomarov

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@mays9185

Ай бұрын

Now that's funny and I'm a American 😂😂😂😂

@user-xh5pc3wd2m

Ай бұрын

its a shetank

@lordyemeth

Ай бұрын

yup, it's was/were

@brentsrx7

Ай бұрын

Ok, that's funny. Are you Russian?

The crew probally active 500% booster

@superspies32

11 күн бұрын

They also forget to buy Universal backup.

@sim51m

10 күн бұрын

they forgot to attack the D point

@roo1871

10 күн бұрын

@@sim51m Hahahahahahah hilarious finding these comments here. Was not expecting this when I came to the comments on this video

@atomalfa7883

10 күн бұрын

war thunder moments

@nomad5195

7 күн бұрын

The 500% SL from that will probably just cover the repair costs 💀

For the record gents, the vehicle at the start of the video is not an M1A1SA supplied by USA, that is infact an M1150 ABV, also supplied by USA, which is based off of the chassis of an M1. So take this with a grain of salt.

@terra7869

15 күн бұрын

I was just about to mention that. The lack of the barrel and the openings on the roof gave it away right away.

@JamesStreet-tp1vb

15 күн бұрын

You'd better take EVERYTHING Russia says with a grain of salt

@josephriley7560

15 күн бұрын

Better yet, just assume everything Russia says is a mountain of bull shit because it usually is.

@vast9467

13 күн бұрын

it’s an abrams without a gun

@bonkabinkleton8288

13 күн бұрын

@@vast9467 and without the armor, its just a shell, probably doesnt have much for composite armour other than enough to stop chemical penetrators

If you look you’ll notice the tank doesn’t have a cannon. It’s not an M1A1 Abrams, it’s an Abram’s conversion into either mine clearance or something similar for engineers.. not sure why this is so impressive to people

So a tank from the soviet era destroyed the hollywood's best tank lmao

@user-wu7ul7lb8j

Ай бұрын

Оскар обратно 😂

@haldakcze420

Ай бұрын

@PabloM11111 ...take your pill and get along with the truth, bro 😄

@lightworker2956

Ай бұрын

@PabloM11111 Random internet users who provide zero proof (i.e. you) aren't very reliable sources of information.

@Faeku_urSelf29

Ай бұрын

​@PabloM11111Keyboard Clown 🤡😅

@DanielCallahan-dd9yk

Ай бұрын

The Abrams is technically from the Soviet era too, lol. This is another Russian media lie. All the Abrams taken out so far in the Ukraine have been from drone drops in the open hatch or direct hits from artillery directed by drone.

I was an M1 Abrams crewman back in the early 90s. We trained in tank platoon and company sized units, 4 to 16 tanks, supported with Bradleys and ground troops and air/artillery support. The problem here isn't necessarily the M1 Abrams, but tactics. You don't send in 1 tank to battle. You need a whole team. Sending 1 or 2 tanks out there is suicide. This shows lack of experience with Ukraine military command...

@adamelestratega

24 күн бұрын

Its not a lack of the Ukraine command, its just the fact that in the war in Ukraine doing so its suicide and impossible for the Ukrainians, who developed hit and run tactics due to the fact that they cant get that many tanks into a single battle

@1991pavlik

24 күн бұрын

😂😂

@diopmamad

24 күн бұрын

Have you forgotten about Bradley Square. If the US army with your tank platoon was deployed in Ukraine it would be destroyed the same way. Fighting Irak is not the same as fighting Russia

@user-cl2ov1zf3u

23 күн бұрын

Так как вы думаете что будете воевать так не будет) самолёты в небе кружить сколько захотят и прикрывать танки не будут ) или если ты ранен ты не позвонишь по раций и не вызовишь вертолёт ты будешь ташить раненого в зелёную зону (ну или первую помощь в красной) где ему уже окажут помощь если смогут)

@user-ix7pj8zb8x

23 күн бұрын

Так это американцы ж их учат воевать и что делать. Ваши инструктора.

Sir, that is a mine clearing vehicle. a M1150, this thing is running M1 Abrams *Classic* armor. it's not meant to be fighting a tank much less anything at all.

@TomasFunes-rt8rd

4 күн бұрын

This is known as "stupid use of military assets."

@nuketown2321

2 күн бұрын

i know, im looking for the barrel on it and i dont see it and everyone in the comments is hating on the "abrams"

Why is Russia bragging about destroying a M1150 ABV? It had no main gun, it was a mine sweeper vehicle.

@Soichy2

14 күн бұрын

Well, its armor is the same as the version with a gun. Moreover, it was better protected, since it did not have ammunition that could detonate if it hit the tank.

@slingblade313

14 күн бұрын

Because there have been several M1A1/M1A2 or whatever stupid version of Abrams destroyed so far, it's just the M1150 was the FIRST spotted and destroyed.

@piotrmalewski8178

14 күн бұрын

For the same reasons the West and Ukraine is bragging about destroying Russian tanks. It's propaganda issue, and I'm growing to believe nobody takes this conflict seriously. Putin has failed to announce general mobilisation which annuls the strenght of his army and makes use of his tanks according to the doctrine they were designed for, impossible! On the other hand, Ukraine is refusing to conscript men under the age of 27 while in WWII countires would officially conscript men of 18 years of age, and often as young as 16 or even 15 to fight.

@linvydasb.7875

13 күн бұрын

@@Soichy2 "its armor is the same as the version with a gun" Yea but having armour and no gun doesn't win u a 1v1 battle. Abrams has blow out panels if the ammunition some how detonated. The video provided no proof that a T-72 destroyed M1 Abrams, Which googling is a Abrams tank with a cannon. So I can conclude that this channel is full of shit, and its content.

@B-52H

13 күн бұрын

​@@Soichy2those are modeled after the M1a1s from the 90s we never gave them any modern tech abrams

why are people acting like the M1 is invincible? its a tank, and tanks can take out any tanks, thats war.

@akyukon

Ай бұрын

It's because Americans think they are superior to other countries and their technology is superior, invincible. The US military excels at long distance air strikes against 3rd world countries and the government uses this success as a propaganda weapon.

@isu152stalin2

29 күн бұрын

Because they watch too much hollywood that involves the Abrams, that's why. Only fax here

@ishikaorimura6803

28 күн бұрын

Thank you!!! You are the only person with a brain in this comment section.

@southerndragon4933

28 күн бұрын

Your one of the few to point that out. But it's most likely those that like one faction over the other faction.

@ishikaorimura6803

28 күн бұрын

@@southerndragon4933 one sided over?

"Russia discovered that shovels fits really tight on tank cannon, might be more effective than anticipated" -The Telegraph.

@non9886

Ай бұрын

but these shovels are extra forged. they can cut us steel as butter...

@WarAuthority

29 күн бұрын

The shovelFS is the greatest tank round ever created.

Gaijin right now is happy AF

@madrazo8567

20 күн бұрын

True

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

7 күн бұрын

lol

@v3lk052

5 күн бұрын

And 1 bradley still can destroy Russian tanks xd

Ok guys--export Abrams and Bradley APV’s do not have the same armor protection as the American models! 😂

M1 Abraham are effective in Hollywood movies.

@briangriffith3985

Ай бұрын

well, they were asked for by an actor🤷🏾‍♂️

@thomasmusso1147

Ай бұрын

​@@briangriffith3985 And one who was supposedly a comedian at that. Now that's a joke .. 😏.

@queiston774

Ай бұрын

Strike

@danilalekseevic9436

Ай бұрын

As russian i can say that abrams is good tank , but it was fighting towards t55s , t62s and some export versions of t72s with old shitty apfsds.

@smyers820gm

Ай бұрын

WTF IS AN M1 ABRAHAM 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Don't worry Canada will send another 13 billion while it's seniors are going to food banks and watching tv with blankets on them

@krabby4456

28 күн бұрын

FJT

@Wolfwolveswolf

26 күн бұрын

Yes- the Luciferian System, which Rules the west.

@rigel1176

23 күн бұрын

That is exact what happened in Germany also ......

@twasb2000

18 күн бұрын

@@rigel1176 Well Germany is on Putins list of territories to recover and countries to destroy, not an easy decision for the Germans

@iamblight707

18 күн бұрын

Ugh. So many Russian bots

Yeah fighting a war hardened army with access to modern equipment is not the same as fighting peasants in flip flops armed with rusty AKs 😅

@absinth2k1

12 күн бұрын

During the First Gulf War, which occurred in 1990-1991 after Iraq invaded Kuwait, the Iraqi army was much better equipped and one of the largest armed forces in the world at that time. The military was still operating under the considerable financial and material investment made during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s. Here's an overview of the Iraqi military equipment during the First Gulf War: 1. **Tanks**: Approximately 4,500 to 5,500 tanks, which included a large number of Soviet T-55s and T-72s, along with a smaller number of more advanced T-62s and some French-made AMX-30s. 2. **Armored Vehicles**: Around 2,800 to 3,000 armored fighting vehicles, including BMP-1 and BMP-2 models. 3. **Artillery**: More than 3,100 artillery pieces, with a robust array of field artillery, self-propelled guns, and multiple rocket launchers, including heavy systems like the Soviet-made SCUD missile. 4. **Aircraft**: The Iraqi Air Force had roughly 700 aircraft, more diverse and capable than in the Second Gulf War, including advanced fighters like the French Mirage F1 and Soviet MiG-29s. 5. **Air Defense**: A dense network of air defense systems, featuring a mixture of Soviet SAMs (surface-to-air missiles) such as SA-2, SA-3, and SA-6, and more sophisticated systems like the French Roland and Soviet SA-8. 6. **Naval Forces**: Though smaller and less significant, the Iraqi Navy had several missile boats and patrol crafts capable of laying mines and conducting coastal defense operations. Iraq's military during the First Gulf War was well-equipped with large quantities of heavy equipment and a variety of systems, reflecting heavy investments during the 1980s. However, despite this formidable arsenal, the Iraqi military was quickly overwhelmed by the technologically superior and better-trained Coalition forces, leading to a decisive defeat. The effectiveness of the Iraqi military was hampered by outdated tactics, poor strategic planning, and the superior air power and precision-guided munitions of the Coalition.

@Cubewuse161

12 күн бұрын

​@@absinth2k1 My guy is so thoughtful that he can give a detailed analysis of Iraqi armed forces, yet he didn't hear of the events in between 2001-2021🤓🤓🤓

@user-nb1nx2rm8x

12 күн бұрын

​@@absinth2k1иракские танки даже т 72 были отстоем потому что это были первые экспортные версии данных танков у которых на момент войны броня была уже слабой прицелы были значительно хуже

@philipp-mauricederleh7010

11 күн бұрын

Yeah .. and destroying a M1150 ABV (which can't shoot back because it has no gun, like you see ) is not the same as destroying an Abrams 🤔😂😂

@galatian5

11 күн бұрын

Ukraine was fighting peasants in flip flops armed with rusty AKs? Or do you mean Russia has been doing that most of their career?

Lmao that's not even a real Abrams, this variant doesn't even have a fucking GUN on it. Its merely transportation. That's like shooting a T-90 with no turret towing a trailer and Ukraine broadcasting videos being like "we killed the BEST Russian tank with an AK-47". The amount of people in these comments talking about "goat herders" clearly don't know how fast the M1A1 cleaned up soviet T-72s in Desert Storm is just fkn gold lmao

@erraldstyler

10 күн бұрын

iits a minefield clearing vehicle on a Abrams hull. M1150 ABV

@quocthang7959

6 күн бұрын

In Desert Storm, M1A1 destroyed only T-72M (export version for third world countries), this version don’t have laser range finder, night vision, computer, composite armour, modern APFSDS round… Soviet Army’s T-72A/B are very different

@godofhate4167

6 күн бұрын

@@quocthang7959 Russia's armor makeup doesn't matter against the long rod of the US DU APFSDS, and in Desert storm, they used the M829A1, which was able to defeat all types of Russian armor during that time. Now the US has the M829A4, which properties are still classified, but we can assume the performance is far superior than the A1, A2 and A3 variants since the M829A3 was "theoretically" (and I say this because its classified) able to pen 400-700mm of RHA and the US specifically designed its ammunition to have less velocity because the Rod has such a thick diameter therefore more kinetic energy. Its kind of hard to deny the billions the US puts into ballistics and technology compared to Russia, which is currently nailing roofing tin in the shape of turtles to the roofs of their MBTs. No one can tell me Russia has better tech after seeing that.

@quocthang7959

5 күн бұрын

@@godofhate4167 no, in 1996 US’s test, M829A2 can not defeat the T-72A frontal armour with Kontakt-5, even at 1000m. If Iraqi have T-72A instead T-72M, the result is very different. You can google to read this test

@user-lg8rh7sm2g

3 күн бұрын

@@godofhate4167 Have you ever wondered why a Russian drone for 500 dollars has already destroyed 5 Abrams for 10 million each? The billions invested by the US government mean nothing when most of it is stolen))

A tank is a tank, no matter what kind of fancy technology you put into it its a giant metal box on tracks. Leopards, Challengers, Abrams, T-64s, T72s, T, 80s, T 90s, They're all good tanks, but they arent invincible. Enough explosive power can take any of them out.

@etzwei7994

Ай бұрын

Yup, something ignorant people refuse to believe since it doesn't align with their worldview and opinions.

@N4CR5

Ай бұрын

Yup I saw a IED made of ANFO (few gallon jugs of it) make an abrams literally go flying, I think A-stan. The crew survived but had serious injuries. They are well put together but not invincible.

@Cesko_Plny_Fialovejch_Zmrdu

Ай бұрын

Abrams does have any fancy technologies, USA just refuse to talk about it so people assume its made out of some sort of alien technology

@petrikchamula1670

Ай бұрын

yeah, i really hate when someone thinks their countires weapons are the best and dont have respect for foreign tech, all of the tanks are diffrent but they´re all incredible machines altho with weaknesses, many complain about russian tank turrets flying but they refuse to believe that one well placed rpg will ruin an abrams, the crew will live but not without serious injuries

@miletello1

Ай бұрын

Exactly….this simply shows the Russian crews are better which isn’t a surprise to anyone…Ukraine isn’t using good tactics.

fought against an extremely weak army in Iraq and then insurgencies hahahaha This is the history of the M1 Abrams, Now is the first time they pit him against a real army. In short, this tank's history is more media-related than practical.

@xrazzr1

Ай бұрын

its like punching a kid and claim that you are the strongest mf ever and then getting suprised by getting punched back by a big dude

@aidboo1054

Ай бұрын

United states armed forces relies on combined arms. Abrams was not meant to fight completely alone, or with just a little support. Just like how 2 Bradley’s managed to knock out a t90’s optics once it was all alone. And just because movies like showing this tank doesn’t mean it’s history is media related, I’d say Russian tanks are more media related with how much they are shown on tv over there

@mdmubin832

Ай бұрын

@@aidboo1054 mybe u didnt go through the info fully...bradley just managed its escape....t90 was destryoed by the drones...yes the bradley damaged it enough

@kurfsolb

Ай бұрын

Army of Iraq had only old soviet tanks and on top of that, they had only practice training ammunition. So americans had it pretty easy over there. But against equal enemy, they are not so great.

@andrzejd5301

Ай бұрын

@@aidboo1054 funny as fuck salty much Abrams is a pieces of shit like any other tank it will be destroyed 🤣

They are literally export versions, my dads abrams survived a shot to the side rpg-7 in a Abrams the Bradley with them absolutely teared up that building, he says they train in this type of terrain so also the crew sucked and they travel in big groups

The Russian AI narrator can’t say the word Abrams 😂

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

7 күн бұрын

It's AI?

@KK-gr9df

7 күн бұрын

@@user-bu7sr1bo6n Yeah…it’s a computer generated voice. Some words get mispronounced. This is a Russian video.

@remipast3347

7 күн бұрын

@@KK-gr9df Video made by a bot for a bots in a comment section, lovely, ruzi propaganda is some kind of a joke

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

6 күн бұрын

@@remipast3347 lol

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

6 күн бұрын

@@KK-gr9df oh ok

As a Russian, it is difficult for me to understand the surprise at this event. Once upon a time, when I asked ("why we are not building new tanks?"), I heard an answer from one of the Russian military engineers who said: - "It is much easier, faster and cheaper to create countermeasures for any modern tank than to build a completely new one."

@DSillius

Ай бұрын

The Abrams is a fairly old platform, they are being upgraded a lot. But the 'Abrams' showed in this video are 90's Variants and are not the latest Abrams'. Considering the Abrams platform dates back to the 80's, but is still getting upgraded to this day by the USA. One more thing, its the Crew, not the Tank. (thanks for reading if you did)

@Greeknext1

Ай бұрын

@@DSillius Man, I understand you love your country and all that, but partly people are right, this tank for the first time in the history of its existence ended up on a real battlefield where it will not crush and blow up shepherds with AK and RPG-7, which is older than the Abrams , but will fight with other tanks and professional military personnel ready to clash with him. And as practice shows, the vehicle did not show ANYTHING that could distinguish it as superior in any way to other tanks. But this is exactly how you positioned it from the moment of its creation. And I think that’s exactly what the public is laughing at.

@DSillius

Ай бұрын

@@Greeknext1 ???, i know damn well that the abrams can be absolutely demolished by super cheap weapons.. its still the crew and not the tank.

@ronaldgagne8364

28 күн бұрын

@@Greeknext1 Close to 8,000 Russian Tanks destroyed. Only 3 Old American Tanks with inexperienced crews. Nothing to laugh at. Unless you're laughing at the Russians being sacrificed for the benefit of billionaires.

@BHShaman

28 күн бұрын

Yea, like Ukraine is swept the field of Russian Tanks with cheap drones. Guess Russia got played by their own advice.

The round used to destroy the Abrams was a shovel.

@blazini

Ай бұрын

Armor Piercing Discarding Shovel Rounds

@korencek

Ай бұрын

I thught it was a "jar of pickles".

@slewone4905

Ай бұрын

Russian shovels sure dig big holes.

@r0mi44

Ай бұрын

sharpened

@manmin517

Ай бұрын

And armour piercing hammer😂

Is everyone forgetting that the M1's being sent to Ukraine are the stripped down versions? They don't have nearly as much protection or current upgrades.

@ThamMalaysia

6 күн бұрын

Most of the kids commenting here know little about tanks.

@jamesmann7449

4 күн бұрын

What about the latest v2 and V3 versions that were blown up in Afganistan and Iraq in the mid 2010s?

@xJaBar4x

4 күн бұрын

They weren't meant for urban warfare. Nothing is indestructible.

@monpetitpeid3582

4 күн бұрын

So you are saying US purposely sent joke tanks to the front line, ensuring Russia victory ✌️. Time you wake up from slumbering sleep 😴 💤 🤔.

@xJaBar4x

4 күн бұрын

You are obviously uneducated. The US sent tanks that did not have components that could be compromised and allow the Russians to steal our advanced technology. Please inform yourself before commenting on the big boy stuff.

Did they thing that the Abrams was indestructible? Everything can be destroyed.

$4 million Tank vs. $500 drone 😂

@gunmasterx1164

Ай бұрын

You wouldn't be able to destroy an Abrams like the way you can with Russian tanks thanks to its blow out panels.

@YugoslavGamer

Ай бұрын

@@gunmasterx1164 The temperature inside the crew compartment raises to at least 55°C in best case scenario. This alone makes blow out panels useless.

@gunmasterx1164

Ай бұрын

@@YugoslavGamer That was in Iraq and Afghanistan.

@gunmasterx1164

Ай бұрын

@@YugoslavGamerand how does heat make the blow out panels useless, they're designed to deflect the explosion away from the crew, not the heat as well.

@korencek

Ай бұрын

@@gunmasterx1164 Russian anti-tank weapons spray molten steel on impact at very high speed, causing internal weapons to detonate. This can penetrate anything. Blow-out panels work only against tungsten penetrating explosive core.

Да ваш Абрамс только против людей в тапочках может чувствовать себя хорошо.

@alexy.3512

Ай бұрын

You got it! 🤣

@user-hn1ph6ry8l

Ай бұрын

Не-не - надежнее против босоногих. А ну как тапками закидают насмерть?

@user-er3rv4bj9q

Ай бұрын

Если взглянуть правде в глаза, Абрамс действительно более совершенная в плане защиты машина чем тот же отечественный Т72Б3. Но, как водится, это не делает его неуничтожимым, позиционное превосходство нашей т72йки позволило уничтожить грозного врага в лице Абрамса

@tastethecock5203

Ай бұрын

обычный ОБТ, в противостоянии с другими ОБТ будет решать то, за кем первый выстрел.

@coraddo280

Ай бұрын

🤣😂

Sure, but look at how the Abrams still has it's turret lol

@josephriley7560

15 күн бұрын

And crew probably survived and didn't get turned into confetti like the Russians do.

People forgot that this is real life, there is no such thing as an Invincible tank

This is why they didn't want to use the Abrams until they had nothing else to send. The images of piled up leopards and Bradley's was already embarrassing enough

@karlrasur8356

Ай бұрын

and what about those piles of russian equipment ? that is not embarrassing ?

@elacme626

Ай бұрын

suure, they destroyed 3 Leo's and 2 Abrams and now you dimwits are cheering. While ruzzia lost 3000+ tanks 🤣🤣🤣 Also bradley destroyed the mighty T-90 And bear in mind, the Abrams crew survived the attack of T-72 but if a Abrams were to hit a T-72 the crew will be minced meat

@DSillius

Ай бұрын

Totally not like they sent the first variant of an Abrams that isnt even in service anymore to ukraine right?.

@Horxy

Ай бұрын

what the hell is actually happening here lmao? as if Russia isn't losing their modernized versions aswell. There's destructions on both sides but when I look at every single video either they're all on that side or the other.

@josephkush1032

Ай бұрын

@Horxy russian tanks are the fraction of the price and use a lot more protection against drones.

These comments are silly. No one has ever said that an M1 Abrams is invulnerable to enemy tank rounds. The video shows drone footage of the knocked-out M1 but does not make clear where the round hit. Of course a Sabot round can disable an M1 if it hits in the correct place. A single M1 crossing open ground is vulnerable to enemy tanks. Anyone with any knowledge of tank warfare already knew this. A force of Abrams being deployed and operated correctly by well trained crewmen is another story. It is not a perfect tank, and no one has ever claimed that it was but it is a very capable tank. These comments need to calm down.

@Ekzomira

29 күн бұрын

Every one talks them up to be invincible so equal talk of how good they are means equal talk of their destruction

@RePlayBoy101

27 күн бұрын

all of these comments just shows how low most peoples intelect and critical thinking is ... this is also why regimes prosper ... the dumber the population is, the freely the regime acts

@neudaiz

26 күн бұрын

Not to mention the actual video of the "M1 Tank" that the T-72 knocked out is clearly not actually an Abrams. They add in the OTHER 3 destroyed Abrams to confuse but look close. No barrel. It's a recovery vehicle or some other utility vehicle.

@OhTheGeekness

26 күн бұрын

@@neudaiz oh right. I noticed that the barrel seemed to be missing but I assumed it was something with the video or that I was looking at it wrong or something.

@UrielVentris1984

26 күн бұрын

@@OhTheGeekness oh that makes sense then its a recovery vehicle made to look like an abrams

Im from germany; our tank experts never claimed that a leopard solves all problems and its still vulnerable, but if used under the conditions of a war of combined weapons it can exploit advantages; better shelter, faster target acquisition, greater range, user-friendlyness. Tanks are, due to the circumstances, frequently used as a kind of close support position under conditions of trench warfare und uncleared minefields.

@nikolamma

16 күн бұрын

Ah ja Deutsche…. Alles auf papier aber in praxis ….

@user-dy3im4zg1z

2 күн бұрын

Good answer. ''Panzer-Stukas'' stiff "friendship", inferior air force of enemy, not modern or inadequate enemy tactics, mechanized artillery, mechanized infantry to protect tanks from RPG's f.e., A/A defense for UAV's, concentration of all armour etc. in only one zone, a very good scouting-preparation for the field's nature [not forests, or rivers, or ''tsernozem''-mud fields etc., this is the most significant preparation for armoured tactics...] KOSTAS TRENT

I dont see an abrams i see a m1150abv, but in any case had it been an abrams and the roles were reversed you would've had a disabled t72. getting the first shot off in any armored engagement is a huge advantage

5 танков Абрамс уничтожено, все которые выползли из укрытий. Горят лучше Леопардов

@JohnDoe-gk5xj

Ай бұрын

Russia ❤️

@renex8434

Ай бұрын

How many T-tanks have been destroyed?

@sebastianlup

Ай бұрын

​@@renex8434including those with fresh Z paintings?

@jozefhorvat3625

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂👍👍👍

@allex_lyric

Ай бұрын

@@renex8434 Any tank can be destroyed. Over these two years, Western propaganda has said a lot that T-series tanks are very bad and are easily destroyed. This video just shows that Amrams is no better. About Leopard and Challenger - the same thing, you can destroy any of them, and YES - even with a shot from a T series tank. T series tanks have a variety of modifications, T72 from 1989 and T72B3 from 2010s - these are two different tanks, despite on the same metal body.

Leopards, even the first ones, actually performed better than Abrams and Challengers. Pure heavy, old, obsolete marketing.

@slewone4905

Ай бұрын

Nato war games , THe Russians always win. I thought it was an excuse for the military to ask America for more money. I think Leopards tend to win tank competition.

@kirilld6206

Ай бұрын

Germany depends on land forces to survive. US was never good at tanks, britts from time to time (vikkers 6 tonns, Centurion, Chieftain). Maritime powers rely on sea and after WW1 also Airforce. It explains why japanese also didn't have great tanks while they actually could if they wanted to.

@mariosmatzoros3553

Ай бұрын

​@@kirilld6206The U.S has had good tanks (such as the Sherman jumbo, Calliope, m26 Pershing ect.) and still has ... The Abrams sepv2 isn't in Ukraine, they were given only older versions.

@kirilld6206

Ай бұрын

@@mariosmatzoros3553 Sherman isn't a good tank at all, any version. Same goes for pershing, chaffee etc. Just look at the height and speed of those m3, m4, they were good only because of hundreds soviet divisions on the east lol. And total air superiority as well. But sherman was comfortable, yes. At a huge price in specifications ofc.

@markdavidson1049

Ай бұрын

@@kirilld6206 What the fuck are you talking about???

Nothing is impervious to anti-armor missiles. In any conflict, the enemy always gets a vote.

werent export abrams the ones without the DU layer in the armor composite?

@caronbicep6476

10 күн бұрын

Yes they were m1a1 not too confuse with m1a1HA(heavy armor) so they weren’t equipped with DU armor, also these are 40 years old.

First of all that T72 was upgraded and fully modernised. Second, the crew is one of the best on the front. And the last, there is a video from a drone where you can see the battle and can hear drone operator loudly shouting to the tank crew: You have cripled it with the first shot, it's smoking..

@blazini

Ай бұрын

Why everytime the Russians kill something someone has to cope and say they basically used magic? It only took 1 hit from a 50 year old tank that was rebuilt 3 times to kill a Super Abrams. Maybe we're just fools for thinking that since we spend 4x as much on a tank that it's going to be any good.

@stephanebiazo9341

Ай бұрын

Link please

@DesertStateNevada

Ай бұрын

@@stephanebiazo9341 Imagine asking for a link when you know clearly youtube usually deletes comments with links in them, so then you can say "oh you didn't post a link, this means its not true" lmao This was old news, a drone destroyed the Abrams, AFTER it was abandoned. What you don't hear is that the Abrams already destroyed 100+ russian tanks.

@uroskostic8570

Ай бұрын

Give us link

@DesertStateNevada

Ай бұрын

@@uroskostic8570 Imagine asking for a link when you know that youtube will delete comments with links. And then you can screech "oh you didn't post a link this means its not true" lol

Abrams fuel mileage alone makes them a meme.

@slewone4905

Ай бұрын

Please don't tell me they drove it to the front line. If they did , they would probably beg Russia for some gas.

@brianpayne4549

29 күн бұрын

Yeah, it drinks gas, like a lot of people smoke cigarettes, BUT, it has the record to back it up.

@Amsfootboy79

29 күн бұрын

Record like what? Like they said against goat herders, 1960s Iraqi tanks and oh that’s right nothing else. Also see what the Yemanese did to a few Abrams in their fight with Saudi Arabia. You’re argument “Abrams tank the best because Merica“, isn’t a valid one.

@DavidHolguln-vi2wj

29 күн бұрын

@@slewone4905 Like Russia Was Begging Ukrainian Farmers When They Invaded Ukraine At The Beginning Of Putlers 3 Day Military Operation???

@brianpayne4549

28 күн бұрын

@@Amsfootboy79 the gulf War would give you a good rough estimate.

Abrams got that 500% booster on 💀

When you are unable or unwilling to utilize combined arms tactics to maximize your lethality against your opponent and instead choose to operate in single units, you set yourself up for failure.

It is not about the size of the shovel but how well you shovel with it

@gunbuckybucketman4578

Ай бұрын

Is this a new Russian's idiom?

@BorisBollokov

Ай бұрын

@@gunbuckybucketman4578 yez

@vitiay7209

29 күн бұрын

That's what she said )))

@narsofficiel2646

27 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂

I think the era of the tank is coming to an end for all sides.

@nemiw4429

Ай бұрын

Nah just different. Either more armor. Maybe even little muclear reactor cuznuts.gona.weight 700000 tons. Or less armor, but with drones.to.find targets. Actually K-51 Germany Panther tank...

@yous2244

Ай бұрын

Nah, just changed tactics, they definitely will make anti drone defences for tanks.

@bonaanayaga

Ай бұрын

I think Russia has it figured out with the T50s as field artillery the let them fire missles from there turrent

@zedeyejoe

Ай бұрын

They said that in 1919 as well :)

@nihilistzero8066

Ай бұрын

nah russia is about to deploy prometheus systems for their tanks.

The M1 Abrams got destroyed. But then another M1 Abrams came by and destroyed the T-72 launching it's turret into orbit 🌍

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

7 күн бұрын

really?

@phaidros100

7 күн бұрын

It was not an Abrams.

@multigameswithryan9215

7 күн бұрын

this is not even an abrams tank, it's an M1150 ABV

@rosszografov614

6 күн бұрын

It's wonderful to have dreams...but for obvious reasons, that is all western supporters have..all delusional...all a game for little boys, escaping adult reality: The Russian Federation Victory 🇷🇺💯💪🎖️🌍🌏🌎🇷🇺♾️💝

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

6 күн бұрын

@@multigameswithryan9215 frf

Imagine spending millions of money just to lost it to low cost weapons lmao

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

7 күн бұрын

ask russia why there t72 are being taken out by 30 dollar drones...

M1 A were involve in wars where the enemy used stones to defend themselves. Never in actual war against another tanks 🤔🤔

@JohnDoe-gk5xj

Ай бұрын

True indeed

@RealNotallGaming

Ай бұрын

YEP!

@gunmasterx1164

Ай бұрын

uh Battle of 73 Easting against the 4th most powerful military (at the time) in the world?

@johnm8015

Ай бұрын

Both the Iraq Wars where the Iraqi army had T-72s??? What the fuck are you saying? Oh you’re an actual Russian bot. What’s it like living off 13k USD?

@rreno496

Ай бұрын

@@gunmasterx1164 don't waste your time trying to educate these tools, they're riding high on their anti-American drivel, let them enjoy it while they can.

The Hollywood props versus real battlefield tanks and the Abram driver name Biden 😅

@Aceclimb84

Ай бұрын

And how many of them real Battlefield tanks have been lost so far what's that a couple thousand they some real Battlefield tanks ! Lol stop its a tank just like all the rest of them they're all meant to kill each other , this entire War is so stupid ! It doesn't matter if it's a Russian tank a Western tank they all go boom and they all go pop but the Russian ones really pop straight up

@slewone4905

Ай бұрын

THat is a lie. It didn't get lost on the way to the front line.

@Theinitedstatesofamerics12345

Ай бұрын

It’s the M1A1 design and the crew has only been trained for a few weeks.

@magnum6763

19 күн бұрын

@@Theinitedstatesofamerics12345 weeks???? you think these guys got more than 2 days of training?

@UnderpaidGuardD9

16 күн бұрын

​@@magnum6763 I'm sure the dang ukrainians get sent alone with their one fucking tank and nothing else

"Oh no we lost 3 tanks, better spend a trillion dollars taxpayer money on a new tank project"

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

7 күн бұрын

They were working on the abrams x program before any abrams were even being considered sent to ukraine.

Most tanks can destroy other tanks Who see 1st win.

@JamesSmith-bo3po

Ай бұрын

New line😅😅😅😅

@theidiotictroublemaker2281

Ай бұрын

Leopard 2 shot a t80 and it did nothing to the t80. The t80 shot back and the leopard crew was sent to god.

@Nellis202

Ай бұрын

@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 Really ? Is there footage of it ? I’m not doubting you , but I haven’t heard of it .

@garytobin5120

Ай бұрын

Nothing has changed the old axiom…if you can be seen, you can be hit, if hit, you can be killed. This applies to any tank on any battlefield.

@ZETA14.88

Ай бұрын

@@garytobin5120 an important tank doctrine is withstanding the first shot and react accordingly, not getting one shot in direct engagement

So the Russians retired the Abram tank series in just 2 weeks of battle,,?? 😂😂😂😅😅

@user-se6xn7tu5o

Ай бұрын

👌🏻

@VIPER276

Ай бұрын

2 years into the war running around to only get destroyed in 5 min in it's first battle 🤣🤣🤣

@The_Prince_Of_Crows

Ай бұрын

Last week there was an article titled "The End of the Abrams Era..." in a major media publication in the US. I forget which one(Washington Post or The National Interest maybe) but the message was received in the west. 😂😂😂

@legrandfromage6450

Ай бұрын

@@VIPER276 well at least it got farther than the ones that sank in the mud past the axles.

@legrandfromage6450

Ай бұрын

@@The_Prince_Of_Crows the Us hasn't developed a new tank model in about 40 years. The ones they have are designed for cruising around on desert hardpan, not soft agricultural land, where they quickly bog down. They are also huge gas-guzzlers.

Also yall gotta realize that the abrams in combat are the older ones from 20 years ago, not chemically composite armored new generation tanks.

Why would anyone think that Russian spokespersons would state the truth?

Rest in peace to the M1 Abrams tank's legacy

@pa008

Ай бұрын

What legacy..?

@mabvutophiri5422

Ай бұрын

@@pa008 haven't you never heard that American weapons are invincible

@user-by3zo7yu9e

Ай бұрын

​@@mabvutophiri5422let me correct that they're invisible on the battlegrounds cause they aren't there

@timothyseeger5296

Ай бұрын

You mean Rust in Pieces right 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@user-by3zo7yu9e

Ай бұрын

@@timothyseeger5296 that's a good one🤣🤣🤣🤣

Inform yourself, its already more than 10 abrams destroyed confiremd filmed.

@user-lf2jh2ru9f

Ай бұрын

It become yesterday news......

@Theaverageazn247

Ай бұрын

why are you shocked? if soviet era goat farmers can light abrams in yemen, why wouldnt modern russian AT weapons do the same?

@ArchangeZ

Ай бұрын

Well this video seems to be made around time where 3-4 were confirmed destroyed. Got uploaded today.

@user-wh2bn6rk8q

Ай бұрын

They just rely on a proof where destroyed tanks are visible clearly, there are more episodes stay invisible when drones couldn't take a picture or a video of them

@Submerjer

Ай бұрын

Actually, 2 to 3 thousand have been destroyed, according to the Russian MOD. This includes 47 destroyed by Putin himself (of which 8 were destroyed with his bare hands with moves he learned from Steven Seagal).

T-72B3 cost a fraction of what any Abrams variant in service. Roughly 500k USD in 2011. It'll be a lot less now, seeing the production has ramped up 10x

Why don't people here in the comments understand that it's not about the destructibility of a tank, but about the probability of survival of the crew. I've never seen an M1 Abrams cooking its crew or trying to send it to the moon. It's harder to replace a well-trained crew than it is to replace a tank. And in almost all videos that show footage of the destruction of Western vehicles, the crew survives. What cannot be said about Russian pressure cookers. In every possible version, I would always choose a Western tank.

M1 Abrams is a zero vs the Rus Washing Machine and Shovel.

@Azercharty

28 күн бұрын

Don t forget the mighty log at the back of it

@nialpollitt3410

26 күн бұрын

It's turret is also a fantastic low earth orbit vehicle.

@lmeza1983

13 күн бұрын

Tungsten shovels apparently

The famous Abrams fought against disarmed Iraq, unarmed or armed with AK 47s Talibans. The Abrams have now really engaged in a hot front and it's just a "tiger paper".

@DavidHolguln-vi2wj

Ай бұрын

What The Hell Is A 'Tiger Paper" ??? Someone Doesn't Have Very Much Schooling, Maybe This Is A Goat Hearder Texting.

@Stubbino

Ай бұрын

@@DavidHolguln-vi2wj They mean paper tiger. Can you speak the same language as them?

@slavUKR

Ай бұрын

​@@DavidHolguln-vi2wjww2 german tank Tiger 1 were thought as a formidable one...but the armor is 100mm front, which can be easily penetrated if not angled correctly

@ameernasruddin5669

29 күн бұрын

​@@DavidHolguln-vi2wj Paper tiger mean someone who appears powerful or dangerous, but is actually weak or ineffectual.. bcuz tiger is powerful but it's actually just a paper so it's weak

@KaiserHooray

16 күн бұрын

@@DavidHolguln-vi2wj Look at this clown capitalizing all his words in the same sentence.

Also, what is shown in the video is not exactly an M1 Abrams, it's some sort of mine clearing vehicle or another type of specialized utility vehicles based on M1 chassis. It has no main cannon.

Try that shot again against a properly upgraded Abrams. The ones sent to Ukraine aren't using depleted Uranium armour and are not likely using the most updated iterations.

похоже что распиаренная западная техника не предназначена для долгосрочного боя , тем более на украинском чернозёме .

"American weapons are made to be sold - Russian weapons are made to win." Learn this!

@garyg736

Ай бұрын

I have been saying that for years US makes weapons for profit while Russia builds weapons that need to be built

@markbulley1179

Ай бұрын

lolz! Aren't they all?! Besides, the Abrams Ukraine have in a basic form and not latest gen which would annihilate at T72 along with a Challenger 2 & 3 which is far superior. Not mention, NLAWS and Javelines make a mess of your much lauded T72 also. Pop goes the weasel.

@gunmasterx1164

Ай бұрын

Russian weapons are not winning in Ukraine

@vk67new67

Ай бұрын

@@markbulley1179 _"which is far superior"_ lolz! Good joke but you needn't be a clown here.

@culer

Ай бұрын

​@@markbulley1179 that is true. I wouldn't share my best variation of any weapon with anyone

So they are proud of destroying a 70s tank with a 70s tank that got modernized?

@gregorteply9034

8 күн бұрын

Yes.

@Your_Local_Gore_Enjoyer

7 күн бұрын

yeah, because the western media are always saying how the Abrams Tank can be a "game changer" and can easily destroy Russians Tanks

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

7 күн бұрын

80's but yeah

@_Igor_Popkov

6 күн бұрын

Is it the Russians’ fault that in 50 years you have not been able to make a newer tank?

@_Igor_Popkov

6 күн бұрын

Why shouldn't Russians be proud of destroying Nazi tanks? Especially those whom the enemy himself considers the strongest, most protected and formidable? And is it the Russians’ fault that in 50 years the United States has not been able to create a new tank? America believes that its tank is adequate to modern warfare - so why shouldn’t the Russians be proud of the destruction of this equipment?

I am pretty sure a lot of Abrams tanks were lost to Improvised Explosive Devices in both theatres of conflicts

its not the tank its the crew . Doug McGregor warned that sending tanks to people not trained and well practiced would be a deaths sentence .

@ComradeRick

Ай бұрын

Ну они же еще и самолёты хотят отправить, точнее уже все решено, учат и ждут момента.

@lmeza1983

13 күн бұрын

You need to realize most of the "hight tech" stuff is being operated by mer- cenaries

The depleted uranium was stripped from the tanks & the main gun is still a 105mm not a 120 mm.These 31 Abrams are the plain old M1A1.

@alexlo7708

29 күн бұрын

No, the Chobham armour is standard. US only pull off reactive armour as an excuse, had the tank being easily destroyed by Russia. By the way, the Ukrainian adding their reactive armour to the tank. Nevertheless, the M1 had gone in one hit.

@ellisgoulding

27 күн бұрын

you can also clearly see that this is a m1150 assault breacher vehicle, with no main armament.

@Macias78ful

25 күн бұрын

@@alexlo7708 Why would they need an excuse? It isn't the first time an M1 has been lost in combat. That version as old as it is has a 7:1 K/D ratio against the T72 going back to the first Gulf War.

@alexlo7708

25 күн бұрын

@@Macias78ful They really need an excuse. Ukraine war is a real battlefield. It isn't kindergarten for the US like Iraq war. Some news reported most Iraqi T72s were destroyed by close air attack, not by tank duel. By the way, this M1 has the newest record of 0:1 K/D against the Russian T72b3. It was killed in one hit. Completely killed that all tank's crew couldn't escape.

@Macias78ful

25 күн бұрын

@alexlo7708 The battle of 73 Easting helped end the Cold War buddy. It proved that Russian gear can't hold up to American gear. It's true even today, which is why France is now the number 2 exporter of weapons. As for the battle of 73 Easting, within the first 30 minutes, about 50 T72 are destroyed along with about 25 APC. By the end of the battle, 160 T72s and 180 APC were destroyed at the cost of 1 Bradley. It was the last major tank battle of the 20th century. But you're right. The US makes war look like it's going against kindergarteners. If the US invades Ukraine, we're in Kiev in a matter of weeks and would be dealing with an insurgency. An insurgency is what Russia has to look forward too but they can't beat the Ukrainians who are using 30 year old hand me down tanks. Sit down, son, because your hero Putin knows the US would rock the Russians. His only defense is to remind the world that Russia has nukes every few weeks.

One T-72 modified... agains single Abrams: whel you got to be a Ballie Dancer!

how can you be sure that It was killed in 1 shot? Russian propaganda cannot be trusted lol

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

7 күн бұрын

fr

@alexsem1756

7 күн бұрын

what is you resources, stop watching fake news

@Lordchippingtonreal

6 күн бұрын

Speaking from my small experience from tanks, as military personal you are required to atleast count how many rounds you had before leaving your BOP or FOB. So the russians probably would find it really hard and stupidly petty to try to lie about how many shots were fired. plus an anylist with the tank's corpse photos could look for any entry wounds the tank may have suffered. if theres more than one entry wound then that means it wasnt 1 shot. if its more, then more were shot.

@user-bu7sr1bo6n

5 күн бұрын

@@Lordchippingtonreal do you think they really took it out in one shot?

@artenio164

5 күн бұрын

@@user-bu7sr1bo6nif any tank is penetrated it will be destroyed 95% of the time. So there is nothing special about this really

I'm tired of the phrase 'game-changer' whenever the West introduce another 'firewood' into the Russian stove.

@mutantos6778

Ай бұрын

It's a game changer for M1's legend :P

@StrataVision

29 күн бұрын

isn't it what the media says? they say stuff like that to grab more attention

@KaiserHooray

16 күн бұрын

The West is all about marketing.

It was a reflex missile shot from the barrel from 7 kms away with the help of drones, also it was a T72-B3M tank 2023 model.

@nemiw4429

Ай бұрын

7km?! Source?

@trade1713

Ай бұрын

It is not a standard shell, it's guided missile. This is the very reason Russians installed this capability in their tanks. ​@@nemiw4429

@MrCshx

Ай бұрын

@@nemiw4429 He is misleading you. It was 2024 modification with specially build version for that exact task - T72-B3M FMREP (for Mother Russian and Emperor Putin). And shot has been done right from the Kremlin square. But don't worry Russians have only one of it's kind

@slavUKR

Ай бұрын

​@@nemiw4429warthunder

@fernandojohnsen7639

Ай бұрын

Dude 7km wtf. it was around 700 Meters

The superiority of the Abrams is on its ability to spot the enemy tank first and at greater distances. If the Abrams is spotted first, it is as vulnerable as any other tank.

People act like the Abrams is immortal. Its not. In fact its over 30+ years old and we needed to upgrade years ago.

Calling the T-72 an Abram killer is a stretch. But any tank modernized can be lethal. The real Apex predator of tanks are drones and artillery shells. But yeah a while ago before they got introduced, the Western media was reporting that these tanks should be able to stand multiple hits from Russian tanks ... I guess not.

@mutantos6778

Ай бұрын

Maybe they were reffering to the hits from coaxial 7,62?

@mctony0965

Ай бұрын

Well the Abrams do have a major weak spot on the front it’s the neck of the turret since it’s huge spot like the video said they shot it between the turret and the hull of the tank. You pretty much kill the hole crew in there

@koiyujo1543

27 күн бұрын

as aamerican gen z it's like people think the abrams is invincible when it's not, tanks are actually pretty vulnerable machines in warfare if are not under infantry protection. The media and such potrays that the T 72s or the T80 or T90 would have a hard time penetrating the tanks armor, yes on the front armor, but the weak spots like the turrets neck or the sides or rear are very much able to be penatrated even by a T72s cannon even if it seems outdated it still is a very capable weapon this shows for the first time finally we are seeing abrams actually being destroyed and being knocked out, it doesn't matter how advanced your equipment is what matters is how you use technology against tanks like the t72 against more modern ones.

@magnum6763

19 күн бұрын

frontally it can withstand hits yes, but this seemed to be from the fucking side. side shots are death sentences for literally everything. just an edit, i noticed a comment saying its a ABV and looked at the video again, and yeah its a damn recovery vehicle. Those have stripped armor to allow for the extra weight, cutting into both the front and side.

@erraldstyler

10 күн бұрын

@@mutantos6778 they were referring to the enemy commanders handgun

The M1 tank is not invincible. No tank is. But I’d rather be in an Abram’s than any other tank in current use.

@jsilvess7722

17 күн бұрын

Those blow out panels are pretty amazing

@agreenandscaredtube6078

10 күн бұрын

have you considered the Leopard 2 A7?

Try to take on an M1A2 SEP V3. They got these Abrams because we don't really use these ones anymore.

The first one to put effective hits on target usually wins the fight. But I also noticed how the turret is still attached to the hull, and the blowout panels appear to have functioned properly. It’s possible even that some members of the crew could have survived this hit. I’d say that’s markedly better performance than most if not all of the T series tanks I’ve seen.

he US military-industrial complex makes objects ten times more expensive and not more efficient than those of Russians in almost every field. The poverty in the United States is appalling, given the cost to the State of the defence budget. It is a permanent attack on the citizens.

@user-ox1pl3po9k

29 күн бұрын

US weapons are very expensive but usually good. Russian stuff is cheap because they don't give a shit about their soldiers. They'd rather have ten cheap tanks than one really good one. Which is often a good strategy. But again, they don't give a shit about how many men and how many tanks they lose.

@absinth2k1

12 күн бұрын

A US worker earn 10 times more then vasily.....thats the reason 😂😂😂

the point is the following: the Americans will always explain their loss as a lack of extra protection, this reminds me of March 27, 1999, when the Serbian army shot down an invisible F-117A, the Americans' answer was due to a malfunction, which is a notorious lie, as well as the other two that were hit, one landed in Zagreb (Croatia) and the other in Tuzla (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

@Slaktrax

Ай бұрын

And by an old Soviet era SAM IIRC(?)

@ceu160193

Ай бұрын

@@Slaktrax Yes, because that old Soviet era SAM had optical targeting, so whole "radar stealth" thing didn't really matter.

@dejanpavlovic9748

Ай бұрын

Zbog obaranja F 117A srbi su se izvinili, nisu znali da je avion nevidljiv...

@monpetitpeid3582

Ай бұрын

​@@Slaktrax A 1956 S200 missile against US stealth fighter 😢😢😮.

@monpetitpeid3582

Ай бұрын

​@Slaktrax Putin did say they would look very beautiful burning.

If the M1 that got destroyed in one shot was just a M1 and not the M1A1 then it's easy to take out with modern rounds. The tank doesen't have the depleted uranium armor that the M1A1 has nor the 120mm. If they had a M1A1 then it'd be a different story, one M1A1 could easily wipe out 5 t-72s without even getting shot.

@gabecollins5585

15 күн бұрын

I wonder how it would be if it was an m1a2

@galacticmarshin4510

15 күн бұрын

@@gabecollins5585 abit better (if it was a American crew), the performance gap between the A1 and A2 is about how well the crew is trained.

@gabecollins5585

15 күн бұрын

@@galacticmarshin4510 That’s a huge deciding factor as well.

@galacticmarshin4510

15 күн бұрын

@@gabecollins5585 I looked further into the tanks the US sent to Ukraine and found out that they are A2s with their depleted uranium armor stripped out, making it a M1 with a 120 and nothing else added to it….

@erraldstyler

10 күн бұрын

Keep dreaming. An Abrams will not take 5 shots from a T72, nor will any other tank in the world.

Duh, they were driving the abrams straight when it identifies as a they/them.

I’ve been a tank engineer for eight years and never once heard any body this brainless in the comment section.

@ellisgoulding

27 күн бұрын

yeah dude for real this comment section is just ruski bots and idiots, i'm losing braincells just reading this shit.

@VoidWalker2047

22 күн бұрын

They’re just coping for the loses on the Russian side. It’d be a waste of time trying to explain anything to them

@JANFU_Nova

21 күн бұрын

welcome to the unwashed masses! enjoy your stay.

@niXity9000

20 күн бұрын

It is just literally a basic russian propaganda video, lightly masked as something else

@gamerdad9870

18 күн бұрын

sounds like you made a Disston Tank

Don’t hear about T72’s now usually T80’s and T90’s

@swiftusmaximus5651

Ай бұрын

the T72B3 is vastly upgraded like a F15 A and a F15 E. The updated t72 fire control system is about as good as the Wests and Rooskie ammo may be superior?

@canon5dmk336

Ай бұрын

Here the subject is that the « best tank in the world « is open like a beer can. 😂

@user-wu7ul7lb8j

Ай бұрын

А завалил т72, снаряду пофиг абра с или миркава😂

@zedeyejoe

Ай бұрын

Well the T90 is a re-badged T72,

@swiftusmaximus5651

Ай бұрын

@@zedeyejoeA T80 is a T72 with a turbine engine because the M! has a Turbine. Now they are re powering them to diesel . The t90 is a lil bit bigger tank. The modern fire control systems, the ammo that can get thru all tank armor and superior numbers is what counts . Yes the M1 is tougher but if hit properly they go down with 1 shot too

fun fact: the abrams doesnt have its full armour

Abrams sent to Ukraine was like giving someone a laptop with Windows Version 3

@vovak4735

Ай бұрын

DOS version 😂😂😂

I remember a US Tank Commander interviewed during the end of the Iraq invasion. Paraphrasing "It was a turkey shoot, if the Iraqi's were in our tanks and we in theirs, we still would have won" A tank is only as good as it's crew. All a Tanks job is, is to protect the crew as much as possible, not be 100% invulnerable. And I'm not an American making excuses, I'm English.

@828enigma6

25 күн бұрын

Thank you.

@MrTeddy12397

20 күн бұрын

Challenger 3 sucks lmao

@alexandrosgrivas4406

14 күн бұрын

not at all he iraqis had experienced crews in iraq technology played the biggest role the abrams had way better opitics and could spot iraqi tanks over way bigger distances usually the shot at them with the coaxial machineguns to give the iraqis a fighting chance also americans had night vision and the iraqis didnt

I'm surprised there are any T-72s left.

At first I thought the Abram’s tank just got ammo racked and activated the blow out panels but smoke looks like it’s pouring out of the frontal armor too.

The ability to adapt on the battlefield wins battles, not old men that can't climb stairs

Of course an opposing force will always say they took out a superior tank. All tanks are not indestructible. The one thing that counts is who will survive the impact and fight another day.

@dennisrichards7994

Ай бұрын

Nope , nobody brags more than the yanks , wait till that f 35 piece of crap tries it in Ukraine !!!

@theidiotictroublemaker2281

Ай бұрын

Yeah they wouldn't make a big deal out of it if it weren't for Americans saying it would eat Russian tanks like in Iraq 😂😂😂😂. For example Russia captured French amx10 rc and destroyed Ceaser artillery also, they destroyed challenger 2 ect... But didn't make a big deal out of it like with Abrams solely because the Russians wanted the Abrams dead.

"suggests that the lack of confidence in the Abrams.". Odd to claim this.. considering how many T-72's have been destroyed and you want to claim that the loss of three M-1's is a complete lack of faith in a weapon system? This is the same type of thinking that the Press of the world is claiming tanks are now obsolete due to the Ukraine war...

they shooting apfsds rounds with more than 450mm armour penetration,flying with a speed more than 1500 m/second any tank can get destroyed by these types or rounds

While his voice does sound real, some pronunciation sounds very much AI and clumsy.

@majesticscope6782

Ай бұрын

Yeah Ukrainian bot thinks

@hectorthewellendowed570

Ай бұрын

it is an AI voice for sure. Just feed it script and record it.

@VIPER276

Ай бұрын

It's not a AI you can hear him breathing at time.

@konstantins4984

Ай бұрын

That’s a real person, I saw his interviews

@damondiehl5637

Ай бұрын

You can hear him taking a breath between sentences. Most AI voices don't do that.

It doesn’t matter how the Abrams was destroyed, it is important that Abrams is not a problem for the Russians!

@rgp8038

Ай бұрын

No weapons are a problem with Russia.

@smitbar11

Ай бұрын

Be interesting to hear how many of Putler's Russian tanks have been lost, plenty! But the Russkies and this propaganda channel will conveniently fail to tell you that!

@user-ud2fc3hj9o

Ай бұрын

Putin told you right before sending your equipment that Abrams, Leopards, Bradleys would burn faster than that paper with the agreement on the transfer of NATO equipment to Ukraine ...))) Does history teach Western countries nothing?)) Every 100 years, a Russian soldier has to repeat to another Hegemon (Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Hitler...Biden?) A historical lesson:Russia is never so weak that it can be conquered ...)) Brave soldiers of the "United Europe" have already come to us on the best tanks at that time, changing the course of the game, as they would say now: Tigers and Panthers, with black crosses on the sides ...))) With the best aviation in the world-Luftwaffe ...))) If you try to forget about the result of that trip, now in the era of Thermonuclear weapons and hypersound, it can be easily and quickly recalled ...))) So the result, NATO superweapons, "capable of turning the tide of the game": Javelin, Bayraktar, Leopard, Hymers, Abrams, Challenger, Patriot-all this is thrown into the trash ...))All samples of these weapons are already in Kubinka and are being carefully studied by our engineers ...)))) There is still the last most terrible weapon that has not yet been seen in Ukraine and which can really turn the tide of the war-you need to call John Rambo!!)))

@anatoleondulet4881

Ай бұрын

I was told that it was a "wunderwaffe", I was fooled ?

@ScottishGamer4632

Ай бұрын

But losing half their tanks to a small country is a problem💀