Russian $100B Aircraft Carrier Admiral Kuznetsov Is Ready For Action With New Capabilities Next Year

Heavy aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov may enter service with Russia’s Navy in late 2024, Russian Aircraft Carrier Admiral Kuznetsov Is Ready For Action With New Capabilities Next Year
Citing some unnamed sources in the Russian Ministry of Defense, the recent report stated that the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov would be armed with the latest weapon and new sensors,

Пікірлер: 397

  • @TheyLive2024
    @TheyLive20245 ай бұрын

    Will it still carry its own tug boat as in the past?

  • @RIchardDavidson007

    @RIchardDavidson007

    23 күн бұрын

    lol

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144
    @wintersbattleofbands11443 ай бұрын

    $100 billion? US carriers cost a fraction of that. Maybe that's all the money they've wasted on it and its repairs.

  • @samempstreet379
    @samempstreet3799 ай бұрын

    She gets a new tugboat next year 😂😂😂😂

  • @RIchardDavidson007

    @RIchardDavidson007

    23 күн бұрын

    lol

  • @abeldyer8316
    @abeldyer83164 ай бұрын

    This video is biased. You never showed the accompanying tug boats which is the carrier’s first line of defense!

  • @shannonalaminski2619
    @shannonalaminski26195 ай бұрын

    😂😂😂 The real question is are the seagoing tugboats ready to follow it out to sea so they can tow it back, again, after it breaks down again.

  • @stanleymax4388
    @stanleymax43889 ай бұрын

    You don't know what you're talking about. Even the biggest US carrier only cost 12 billion.

  • @perryjoejimbob
    @perryjoejimbob9 ай бұрын

    The Russian Navy, a running joke for 200 years. Kuznetsov biggest joke ever.

  • @perryjoejimbob

    @perryjoejimbob

    9 ай бұрын

    Sail into Black Sea so it can join the Moskva.

  • @Jmpd1117
    @Jmpd11175 ай бұрын

    Russia will need 36 months or more to bring the crew and pilots to true battle standards, effectively delaying it’s deployment until 2027 at best.

  • @puff9536
    @puff95367 ай бұрын

    The thing puts off so much smoke you can see it on the other side of the planet 😅

  • @916medic
    @916medic10 ай бұрын

    $100 billion is wrong. An advance Nimitz class carrier cost the US $13 billion. Not $100 billion. I think you mean $10 billion or $1 billion.

  • @johnchapman6013

    @johnchapman6013

    9 ай бұрын

    I thought that , also .

  • @edwardsmth3

    @edwardsmth3

    9 ай бұрын

    @@johnchapman6013 Think better, could be.. this machine is more than an aircraft carrier. its a combination of Battle carrier + Frigate . (Lesser convoy, Full combat ready)

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    $100 billion for a frigate? Then they're really dumped too much into it. @@edwardsmth3

  • @LazyXog

    @LazyXog

    5 күн бұрын

    Watch this. Your best aircraft carrier up in smoke within seconds. Stop bragging. kzread.info/dash/bejne/hqierLSPipS-ZJs.htmlsi=HST0gXvfzFUOF4jp

  • @melgross

    @melgross

    4 күн бұрын

    @@edwardsmth3it’s a small piece of obsolete crap. It’s not even close to being a “heavy” aircraft carrier. A heavy aircraft carrier weighs around 100,000 tons. This weighs 58,000 tons. The only reason Russia hasn’t scrapped this junk is prestige. Without an aircraft carrier, Russia’s navy wouldn’t be considered world class.

  • @tmilholin7552
    @tmilholin75529 ай бұрын

    will it sink at sea trials is the question?

  • @d.b.1176
    @d.b.11767 ай бұрын

    What's new for 2024? It will become a submarine.

  • @undertaker21-18

    @undertaker21-18

    5 ай бұрын

    🤣🤣🤣🤣👍

  • @oscare.quiros6349
    @oscare.quiros63493 ай бұрын

    Improved and modernizsed Tagboat too! 😂😂😂

  • @moseskk2022
    @moseskk202210 ай бұрын

    Большое уважение к России за производимое ею оружие 🇷🇺🇷🇺🙏

  • @hercg1967
    @hercg196710 ай бұрын

    Hope they replaced the diesel motors, Having its own tug is crazy..

  • @btolsen
    @btolsen9 ай бұрын

    Love the BS. Old footage of Floating Firewood.

  • @red_red3743

    @red_red3743

    3 ай бұрын

    Americans pls tame your ego,your economy is not number 1 anymore and after dedollarisation we will see how much aircraft carriers US is going to REALLY afford lmao

  • @brokensun100
    @brokensun1004 ай бұрын

    The question should be asked, "Will it need to be accompanied by a tug", as it used to be?

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    We'll see. It's supposed to be getting a new propulsion system.

  • @TonyChan-eh3nz

    @TonyChan-eh3nz

    2 ай бұрын

    @@wintersbattleofbands1144the corpse of kuznetsov spinning in his grave does not count, nor does a bottle of vodka

  • @melgross

    @melgross

    4 күн бұрын

    @@wintersbattleofbands1144sure. We’ll see.

  • @RyanBabiesChannel
    @RyanBabiesChannel4 ай бұрын

    Russia's aircraft carrier admiral. Kuznetzov scrap it to junk

  • @rago8594
    @rago85949 ай бұрын

    And it is equipt with $100billion tug boats😂😂😂

  • @v-tube3417
    @v-tube341710 ай бұрын

    Hope Russia sorted out the smoke problem.....All that black smoke emitted is saying to the enemy,here we are!!!

  • @johnchapman6013

    @johnchapman6013

    9 ай бұрын

    New engines . New everything .

  • @robertofelipe95
    @robertofelipe959 ай бұрын

    Is that the one always blowing up smoke that everyone laugh at ?!!

  • @kodulau3548
    @kodulau354810 ай бұрын

    100 billion!! Are you sure?

  • @lucasholy7821

    @lucasholy7821

    10 ай бұрын

    Rubls

  • @derikuk2967

    @derikuk2967

    10 ай бұрын

    Ten cents + plus the resale value of the metal is about all an aircraft carrier is worth. What a complete waste!

  • @alanfan8941

    @alanfan8941

    28 күн бұрын

    Maybe if you add up the three or four full rebuilds that this hull has undergone, along with the upgrades and revisions. You also need to consider how long it has sat in dry dock. Then you have to add in the towing cost, once from the eastern Mediterranean and once from the English Channel. Then there is the cost of the sunken floating dry dock to take into account and the fines that Russia incurred from the oil spill from this ship off of Great Britain. All in all, they probably could have scrapped this ship and built two new modern ones for what they have spent trying to keep this one operational. It is truly an unlucky ship. I wonder if they have done anything about crew comfort? Serving aboard this ship is considered to be the worst duty in the Russian Navy considering how often basic systems such as heating, air conditioning, and fresh water production break down.

  • @matrixmodifiersgroup5596
    @matrixmodifiersgroup55969 ай бұрын

    Thanks for presenting

  • @plasmarun544
    @plasmarun5446 ай бұрын

    Oh this should be fun to watch, Mayday/Mayday we have lost our propellers.... No answer.....US navy comes to help, takes it back to the US.

  • @kuidezso8465
    @kuidezso846510 ай бұрын

    All lewell upgrade ❤ Old & New Army & Class Congratulation Russia ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @gordonallen9095
    @gordonallen90954 ай бұрын

    The world largest floating LEMON. With the time and money already spent, they could've laid a keel for a NEW modern carrier and been in the completion stage by now. Moree good rubles after bad.

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    Except they lack the knowhow to build a better one. You have to engineer things like keeping your pipes from freezing into the design before you build it. They can't. Because of corruption, stuff is simply "done," not done right.

  • @bampie1
    @bampie19 ай бұрын

    Compared the US carriers this is an embarrassment it belongs in the 20th century it is a relic from another time

  • @jerry4251
    @jerry425110 ай бұрын

    Why don't they get rid of that piece of garbage it's old They have problems with it Why don't they just build a new one they build everything else

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    This ship was actually built in Ukraine. Yup.

  • @melgross

    @melgross

    4 күн бұрын

    They have no money for one. Repairing this is the only way they can have a carrier.

  • @backaboki1926
    @backaboki192610 ай бұрын

    Rusia Strong WOLD! 💪💪💪

  • @thomasgellos1732
    @thomasgellos173210 ай бұрын

    The Navy engineers must be honored to work on this Beautiful Carrier that has a historical significance to it

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    They love a challenge, apparently.

  • @sidensvans67
    @sidensvans6710 ай бұрын

    Awesome . Slava Russia 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @Sandhushah-qw2pq

    @Sandhushah-qw2pq

    9 ай бұрын

    Is that real 🤔

  • @greyghost61

    @greyghost61

    8 ай бұрын

    Will it fall apart again 😂

  • @SDM496
    @SDM49610 ай бұрын

    100 Billion dollars worth aircraft carrier? Lol😂. Did you want to write 100 billion rubles worth?

  • @Rob_F8F

    @Rob_F8F

    9 ай бұрын

    Makes the Gerald Ford at only $13B a positive bargain! 😂😂😂

  • @melgross

    @melgross

    4 күн бұрын

    Probably. That seems right.

  • @NorthernMafia8
    @NorthernMafia89 ай бұрын

    😂😂😂 the trash boat that needs a tug to follow it everywhere

  • @redstar8226
    @redstar822610 ай бұрын

    Can't wait to see it in action against Ukraine

  • @lemokolyon

    @lemokolyon

    10 ай бұрын

    If it is based on Black Sea. I would think it is North of Russia. I d k...

  • @MaxCroat

    @MaxCroat

    10 ай бұрын

    @@lemokolyon It is a part of the Northern Fleet, yes. Besides, it would be no use against Ukraine. It is a ground war primarily, there is literally no reason to put their only aircraft carrier in danger.

  • @lemokolyon

    @lemokolyon

    10 ай бұрын

    @@MaxCroat 👍that's common sense.

  • @davidmullens6927

    @davidmullens6927

    10 ай бұрын

    It would have to be towed anywhere. Organise a reserve crew also as this ship has killed more Russians than anyone else

  • @MaxCroat

    @MaxCroat

    10 ай бұрын

    @@davidmullens6927 It certainly has had major issues in the past. Apparently, they are overhauling the whole ship, including the propulsion system which was the most problematic part as far as I know. It remains to be seen whether or not the issues will be fixed when the ship is recomissioned.

  • @FunteX
    @FunteX16 күн бұрын

    Russia asuring that tugboats, and trainingwheels never go out of ashion . . . 😂😂😂

  • @AM-cw1kp
    @AM-cw1kp3 ай бұрын

    It really speads heavy black smoke

  • @lahdahnowens7490
    @lahdahnowens749010 ай бұрын

    WoW, this is a serious moving weapons platform....🎉🎉🎉

  • @timrutkevich3222

    @timrutkevich3222

    10 ай бұрын

    It is, there are missiles, guns, as well as aircrafts

  • @lahdahnowens7490

    @lahdahnowens7490

    10 ай бұрын

    @@timrutkevich3222 It just might have tactical nukes in those silos also. But you didn't hear that from me.🤔

  • @timrutkevich3222

    @timrutkevich3222

    10 ай бұрын

    @@lahdahnowens7490 it could, but tactical nukes also need special storage and specialists to service them. I highly doubtful that this platform would have used for them

  • @franciscruickshank8794

    @franciscruickshank8794

    10 ай бұрын

    $100 BILLION ? WHAT A LOAD OF BOLEX ! THE NEWESTUSA RUBBISH CARRIER COST $11.BILLION ! PLENTY TARGETS FOR CHINA !

  • @user-ic9tl3rv1k
    @user-ic9tl3rv1k10 ай бұрын

    Russia must get this right.

  • @timrutkevich3222

    @timrutkevich3222

    10 ай бұрын

    This is result of cooperation between Russia, China and India. All of them have the same class ships, they were all contracted in what now is Ukraine, and had to find out solutions to service and modernizing them without factory support

  • @MH-df6zx

    @MH-df6zx

    9 ай бұрын

    The only problem is that it rarely moves on its own and when it does, it's by using a tug that's always sailing with it or at least that how it was done. After the refit maybe it'll work but I doubt it, it's a floating rust bucket peace of crap, Russia should have designed and built a new aircraft carrier or a new aircraft carrying missile cruiser instead of slapping money at this rust bucket

  • @E.Johansson

    @E.Johansson

    9 ай бұрын

    @@MH-df6zxyou’re right. The fact that it uses a diesel engine instead of a nuclear powered one also show how obsolete it is.

  • @MH-df6zx

    @MH-df6zx

    9 ай бұрын

    @@E.Johansson it can use a diesel engine though I think it's a boiler but I think the least it could do is work, any propulsion that works would be a great step forward. But I doubt that this rust bucket will do anything other than commit suicide and sink on itself just to relieve itself of its miserable life

  • @headcold7970

    @headcold7970

    5 ай бұрын

    Russia must get war machine right? Russia must get Russia right.

  • @thierryk5381
    @thierryk538110 ай бұрын

    100 billions $ carrier dont exist, nk one has the money to build it..fake title

  • @antoninagarkalna1444
    @antoninagarkalna14449 ай бұрын

    Crimea - unsinkable "aircraft carrier" of Russia. Sevastopol from the very beginning of its Russian existence was built by sea fortress. It is one of the world’s three best anchoring stations (also Sydney and Singapore) protected by powerful coastal batteries. Crimea was historically Russian after huge sacrifices during the Russo-Turkish Wars, the Crimean War (1853-1856) and the Great Patriotic War. The heroic defense of Sevastopol has forever entered Russian history as an example of unprecedented valor and courage. And now Crimea with all its bases is an unsinkable aircraft carrier of Russia, it is necessary to protect the southern borders of Russia. As Konstantin Frolov- wrote in his anthem of Sevastopol during the Crimean War: “As long as Russian Sevastopol is Russia - Russia will know no shame”.

  • @NightshadeX85

    @NightshadeX85

    5 ай бұрын

    Yeah, how is the Moskva these days ?

  • @v-tube3417
    @v-tube341710 ай бұрын

    Dont know about 100 Billion dollars but welp donr Russia!

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance462710 ай бұрын

    Obviously not as affective as a US carrier, but still a powerful warship that will need to be dealt with! Personally don't think the Russian navy need aircraft carriers, due to their foreign policy. Unlike the US, they are not obsessed with world domination by force!!!

  • @ttjuicer5916

    @ttjuicer5916

    10 ай бұрын

    Admiral Kuznetsov will soon perform underwater operation anyway...

  • @Scorpio69

    @Scorpio69

    10 ай бұрын

    @@ttjuicer5916 dont worry they have plenty of modern weapons very effectively to oparate above water.dont you think? Unless you live in jupiter.

  • @ttjuicer5916

    @ttjuicer5916

    10 ай бұрын

    @@Scorpio69 yea but they are incompetent to operate them + ukrainians have plenty of neptuns & drones :) i know u are ru fanboy but anyway nobody will win this war...

  • @user-nj5si7ms5l

    @user-nj5si7ms5l

    10 ай бұрын

    ​@@ttjuicer5916Помечтай шакал ,идёт полная модернизация ,чтобы уничтожать не только Украину,но и НАТО!

  • @user-cg3iv8wq5d

    @user-cg3iv8wq5d

    10 ай бұрын

    Почему он должен держать в тонусе США в мировом океане, чтоб американцы не чувствовали себя неуязвимыми и безнаказанными.

  • @veyanrealty1
    @veyanrealty19 ай бұрын

    Due to newest technologies Aircraft carriers become such an easy target for . . example . . hipersonic missiles.

  • @NightshadeX85

    @NightshadeX85

    5 ай бұрын

    Nope, the hypersonics have had a very poor PK and hit rate. Older Pat batteries managed to take several out. Very much doubt hypersonics are going to breakthrough Aegis Defence systems. Might want to read up about actual western Naval ship defence systems. ECCM missiles and SM-6's along with the track radars are far more sophisticated and able to deal with hypersonics.

  • @veyanrealty1

    @veyanrealty1

    5 ай бұрын

    @@NightshadeX85 Ok thanks. I´ll look into it !

  • @BoiStudio

    @BoiStudio

    4 ай бұрын

    Due to recent developments, hypersonic missiles are unable to sink US carriers due to the AEGIS system.

  • @garyhall3919
    @garyhall391910 ай бұрын

    the title looks like a google translate result

  • @gmundenat
    @gmundenat2 ай бұрын

    Who comes up with this nonsense? That ship was outdated 20 years ago.

  • @fifi23o5
    @fifi23o510 ай бұрын

    Where did you find that figure? $100B??? Get serious,

  • @innerlight7018
    @innerlight7018Ай бұрын

    The Kuznetsov is not a aircraft carrier, it's a heavy aircraft cruiser.

  • @TankMasterGo
    @TankMasterGo28 күн бұрын

    100 billion? That number is quite exaggerated

  • @Hbmd3E
    @Hbmd3E10 ай бұрын

    Mc Gregor just pointed out that these are useless in future war as battleships became obsolete " too easy to destroy "

  • @stuartemmanuel3735

    @stuartemmanuel3735

    10 ай бұрын

    Just like the US carriers too.

  • @julwiezdeghorz5089

    @julwiezdeghorz5089

    10 ай бұрын

    Carriers are useless ss in a nuclear war that will last less than an hour.

  • @wolfswinkel8906

    @wolfswinkel8906

    10 ай бұрын

    US Navy has a lot more of these "obsolete ships".

  • @Hbmd3E

    @Hbmd3E

    10 ай бұрын

    @@wolfswinkel8906 I guess they are use full in bombing weaker people

  • @lordfedjoe

    @lordfedjoe

    9 ай бұрын

    ​@@Hbmd3Eexactly!

  • @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd
    @MarkLandrebe-ef5ydАй бұрын

    What an EMBARRASSMENT, for the World to see !!

  • @alekseyef1714
    @alekseyef171410 ай бұрын

    👍👍👍

  • @thewedge8823
    @thewedge88237 ай бұрын

    Please change the engines so there's no more black smoke!!!

  • @maluti7491
    @maluti74919 ай бұрын

    It's a floating scrapyard, even after its supposed refit. A pile of junk.

  • @Hbmd3E
    @Hbmd3E10 ай бұрын

    better get lasers and miniguns + small rocket systems, on the deck for the drones and hypersonics ?

  • @tsclly2377
    @tsclly237710 ай бұрын

    hope it went nuclear.. get rid of that stupid diesel.. and every tube should be AA/defense related...

  • @6.6.12

    @6.6.12

    10 ай бұрын

    А ты не знал ,что Kusnezow hat 2 Atom Reaktor +2 Gasturbinen .Kuznezow Kriegt Raketen Kaliber ,Raketen Onix P 800 +8 Raketen Zirkon.

  • @Chunkylover.

    @Chunkylover.

    10 ай бұрын

    Kuznetsov literally has 8 CIWS and 24 anti air missile launchers. That's x3 of what the USS Nimitz has.

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    Not very effective in dry dock, or if they don't work. They don't work on Russia's other ships... @@Chunkylover.

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    That would be a completely different animal. Not something you just swap in.

  • @Rob_F8F
    @Rob_F8F9 ай бұрын

    Why are there so many reversed images of the Kuznetsov and shots of the UK Queen Elizabeth class carriers?

  • @nusplus3985

    @nusplus3985

    6 ай бұрын

    all those animated and photoshopped images made because of lack any real images of non-ruined kuznetzov - reality is so far from all those glamour fotos...

  • @matthewgibbs6886
    @matthewgibbs688610 ай бұрын

    as lonf as they got rid of the pos propulsion system

  • @frankward8003
    @frankward800310 ай бұрын

    Hopefully they upgraded the tug boats that always sail with it.

  • @d.b.1176

    @d.b.1176

    7 ай бұрын

    You spoiled the surprise 🤣🤣🤣

  • @HenriHattar
    @HenriHattar5 ай бұрын

    100 billion rubles maybe! If thiis thing ever gets into service I will have a sex change!

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    I think your weenie is safe.

  • @lakkchina
    @lakkchina10 ай бұрын

    Not a single picture of the after restore carrier

  • @JoeBLOWFHB

    @JoeBLOWFHB

    10 ай бұрын

    It was restored to look like shyt to fool her enemies into thinking she is still a turd factory run on farts and vodka belches. When called to battle she'll have 40 ARMATA 15 hypersonic flying tanks. And she'll be commanded by an angry bear in a ushanka....It will be glorious 😢

  • @optic_wt

    @optic_wt

    6 ай бұрын

    Because its never gonna be fixed, even if they modernize it the ship is too old

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    That's because it's not done. Supposed to be this year (2024)(that'll never happen).

  • @MarkjosephValentin-pr9eu
    @MarkjosephValentin-pr9eu3 ай бұрын

    Good job again Russia.

  • @Josh3B
    @Josh3B3 ай бұрын

    And the use of mazut as fuel? The crew never having fresh water? I mean.... sensors and latest SAMs are great and all, but how about that tower of thick black smoke everywhere you go?

  • @karjuska
    @karjuska2 ай бұрын

    maybe you can, maybe not, it's not more likely unless they make it a submarine

  • @jeanschaeffer4225
    @jeanschaeffer422510 ай бұрын

    SORRY,,,,,, THERE IS NO PLACE,,,,,FOR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS.. ANYMORE,,,, WE THINK ,,,,,CAN BE SUNK TOO,, EASELY ,,, THOSE DAYS,,, RIGHT WRONG,,,, GREETINGS FROM ASIA

  • @rapture1949
    @rapture194910 ай бұрын

    Sorry 😂..... it's a total disaster 😂

  • @viciarcado4096
    @viciarcado4096Ай бұрын

    No, it will not be ready.

  • @JerryCans101
    @JerryCans10110 ай бұрын

    Awesome does it still have its own Tugboat

  • @KyleRoberts-fj7fj

    @KyleRoberts-fj7fj

    10 ай бұрын

    Will find out soon hopefully that tug boat has some big fire extinguishers cause you know all too well a special fire will start on it ...

  • @alpialpiansyah4086
    @alpialpiansyah40865 ай бұрын

    Sudah di tempelkan ke cahaya raksa'an nya.

  • @henkstersmacro-world
    @henkstersmacro-world10 ай бұрын

    👍👍👍🇷🇺🐻🇷🇺👍👍👍

  • @SzilaspogonyLivin
    @SzilaspogonyLivin9 ай бұрын

    Kuznetzov isn’t an aircraft carrier but heavy aviation cruiser. Great boat she is.

  • @samempstreet379

    @samempstreet379

    9 ай бұрын

    Its a barge

  • @matthewdopler8997

    @matthewdopler8997

    9 ай бұрын

    Graceful as an alcoholic at Octoberfest. It even needs a babysitter (a tug boat) to follow it at all times.

  • @kaiser_landschaft7941

    @kaiser_landschaft7941

    8 ай бұрын

    What a nonsense. This is a terrible seaside unit.

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    It's a joke. The whole world knows it.

  • @chrisweber7460
    @chrisweber74602 ай бұрын

    I think we will never see this ship in open water! To rusty! This ship is only good for destroying dry docks! Anyway: this ship belongs to the Ukraine! What Russians don't steal! 😉

  • @atanasvasilev3228
    @atanasvasilev32289 ай бұрын

    Is that 100billion rubles? Cuz USD - that cannot be truth. US modern nuclear carriers cost 14 billion.

  • @tonyso9637
    @tonyso96379 ай бұрын

    Real party has not started yet. It is still a warm-up play-time. “Party” without Admiral Kuznetsov is no party. The world ain’t see nothing yet. Party will have fun in 2014. My 1-man opinion.

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    Um, that was 10 years ago.

  • @marklayman1305
    @marklayman130510 күн бұрын

    $100B?

  • @joeblowe3180
    @joeblowe3180Ай бұрын

    What a pile of garbage this thing is. How many decades is it going to be towed around and lodged in port. Lmao

  • @RyanC143
    @RyanC1439 ай бұрын

    Russia aircraft carrier are broken

  • @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo
    @HanabangIrawan-nu7uoАй бұрын

    No , this aircraft carrier , not for use again , will become museum ......russia have plan build very big aircraft carrier , name Shtorm .....

  • @satharauv5555
    @satharauv55559 ай бұрын

    🤑Russia is poor country do you believe?

  • @nusplus3985

    @nusplus3985

    6 ай бұрын

    of cource - they do not have even toilets at home, not speaking of warm water or some more sdvanced civilization achievments as roads, gasification or kindergarten - more than a million kindergartens shot down in last twenty years. more than 200 000 plants shot down, destroyed, looted and ceasing to exist - even the non-roi plants from soviet era. and no coincidence all of this happening during another drugdealing kgb-officer in power. kgb as usual.

  • @BinarySounds
    @BinarySoundsАй бұрын

    Is it ready for action yet? 😂😂😂😂

  • @jackwalker9492
    @jackwalker94923 ай бұрын

    Coal powered and thermal from onboard fires. Teaming up with the mighty Moskva. Back up oars.

  • @mac2626
    @mac26269 ай бұрын

    Glory to the Admiral Kusnetsov and her Glorious Tug Boats.

  • @Rob_F8F

    @Rob_F8F

    9 ай бұрын

    Slava Tugboats!

  • @user-bm9nd6yk5h
    @user-bm9nd6yk5h3 ай бұрын

    Et bientôt au fond de l'eau ? Comme 15 autres navires Russes depuis le début de la guerre ...😏

  • @billcouch8308
    @billcouch83085 ай бұрын

    A piece of junk, as all Russian (Soviet) ships are see 1905 VS Japan.

  • @district5198
    @district51989 ай бұрын

    Russia needs to mass produce project 23000E shtorm and project 23560 lider class.

  • @Rob_F8F

    @Rob_F8F

    9 ай бұрын

    Friend, the Kuznetsov was built in Nikolayev, Ukraine SSR. The Russian Federation does not have a shipyard big enough to build the Shtorm.

  • @district5198

    @district5198

    9 ай бұрын

    @@Rob_F8F Very familiar and once ALL of Ukraine is brought back to mother Russia, they will again have a ship yard big enough.

  • @Rob_F8F

    @Rob_F8F

    9 ай бұрын

    @@district5198 At the actual rate of progress for taking ALL of Ukraine, the plans for Shtorm should be filed away, then the design for the generation after Shtorm should begin, then when that design is completed, it can also be filed away, and work begun on designing the generation after that. Perhaps when those plans are complete, then Russia can rebuild the shipyard that it will have completely destroyed in the process of capturing it. Maybe Putin should just ask Xi to build one for him. Xi would be willing to do it in exchange for getting Russia Far East in payment.

  • @district5198

    @district5198

    9 ай бұрын

    @@Rob_F8F Russia has strategic partners that are more than capable to cooperate and have the capability to build multiple aircraft carriers at once, as well as destroyers

  • @Rob_F8F

    @Rob_F8F

    9 ай бұрын

    @@district5198 Perhaps Russia's strategic partner, India, will sell Russia the INS Vikramaditya (the old Баку). 🤣🤣🤣

  • @deanhankio6304
    @deanhankio63049 ай бұрын

    1:25 shows truth: black smoke ! This ship is a floating trash. Russia does not have a practical aircraft carrier.Not even one !!

  • @alpialpiansyah4086
    @alpialpiansyah40865 ай бұрын

    Surga badan nya.

  • @8NP4iN
    @8NP4iN10 ай бұрын

    Hahaha yooo 100B Please recheck numbers American versios the most expensive cost 12 Billion each So its impossible the russian version costs 100B Its much smaller and less capable in comparisson

  • @Rob_F8F

    @Rob_F8F

    9 ай бұрын

    Maybe their reputations are reversed. Russia is the big spender. US makes cheaper versions. 😂😂😂

  • @FrancesSanchez-gw7lt
    @FrancesSanchez-gw7lt10 ай бұрын

    NICE ONE

  • @selimemini4503
    @selimemini45034 ай бұрын

    VAŽNO MORE ALBANIA IMA AJRDRUM MORE HERVACKO NEMA ZAŠTO IDE NATO EWROPA VI PAKERI ĆUVA EWROPA MORE HERVACKO DA PERA GAQE

  • @michaelrussell4254
    @michaelrussell42549 ай бұрын

    Haha what a load of scrap😂😂

  • @jasonshenton7680
    @jasonshenton768010 ай бұрын

    a 100billion????!!!!???!!!??!! £10 more like...lol

  • @bojanpalink5471

    @bojanpalink5471

    10 ай бұрын

    Since Roman Times Romans had names for all nations only anglotards were called perfidius Albion

  • @lordmalvada8212

    @lordmalvada8212

    10 ай бұрын

    @@bojanpalink5471 Lets hope she has the same skill as the Moskva submarine class...... ( too soon ? )

  • @bojanpalink5471

    @bojanpalink5471

    10 ай бұрын

    @@lordmalvada8212 Let's just hope that those fleeing the country will be like the Americans who fled the Taliban in flip-flops

  • @lordmalvada8212

    @lordmalvada8212

    10 ай бұрын

    @@bojanpalink5471 Oh please. They left when they choose too unlike the Russians who were defeated and ran away.

  • @d.bruckner3459
    @d.bruckner345910 ай бұрын

    There were two different ( other countries flags shown , ON THE VESSEL , and different countries aircraft ! I call this video BS !

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    Filler footage.

  • @hapitpalag8401
    @hapitpalag84013 ай бұрын

    fuel old tires😆

  • @navigatorx1013
    @navigatorx10139 ай бұрын

    ROFFL............. The thing is a floating campfire. Kuznetzov will be back in dock soon enough. РОЛЬФ............. Справа в плаваючому багатті. Кузнєцов незабаром повернеться на лаву підсудних.

  • @PakCikBawang-sv9qo
    @PakCikBawang-sv9qo9 ай бұрын

    Russia had only one ACC 😅

  • @user-ig8ew8qz8n

    @user-ig8ew8qz8n

    9 ай бұрын

    So what ?🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @KuatTheePhu

    @KuatTheePhu

    8 ай бұрын

    @@user-ig8ew8qz8n So make more AC

  • @nusplus3985

    @nusplus3985

    6 ай бұрын

    @@KuatTheePhu impossible - no brains no skills, and if given budget money - imediatelly stolen in offshore palaces. so no aircraftcarriers. such is life.

  • @asdf42042
    @asdf42042Күн бұрын

    ready for action. Yes. Tug action. There is no way the Russian navy is capable of operating this aircraft cruiser. China has the exact same ship but does not have the same problems as the Russians. It's clearly the Russian incompetence that ruined this Ukrainian-built ship.

  • @robertofelipe95
    @robertofelipe959 ай бұрын

    Evening the Chinese are building new aircrafts carriers .. can’t the russian afford to build new ones ?? That one is a piece of junk !!

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144

    @wintersbattleofbands1144

    3 ай бұрын

    They can't, and they don't have the knowhow even if they could afford it.

  • @EdCUSA
    @EdCUSA10 ай бұрын

    $100 Billion? Are they making it gold platted? LMAO! Clearly proves Russian cant make shit. A brand new US super carrier is just under $13 billion. Modernization of an existing aircraft carrier is a waste of money, just asked the USN trying to extend the USSN Kennedy life cycle. Hull fatigue will keep the Kuznetsov in port most of the time.

  • @jaigi2

    @jaigi2

    10 ай бұрын

    Russians invented metallurgy, remember cryogenic engines?

  • @EdCUSA

    @EdCUSA

    10 ай бұрын

    ​@@jaigi2ok. then why they are paying for something they can get for free? Ohh I know is going into Putin's pockets. Well played Putin.

  • @J.B.29

    @J.B.29

    10 ай бұрын

    I think it's in rubles. If so I think that's 1.3 billion in u. s. Dollars

  • @lordmalvada8212

    @lordmalvada8212

    10 ай бұрын

    @@jaigi2 They also invented Transformers. Look at the Moskva, Now a Sub.

  • @micamika8844
    @micamika88449 ай бұрын

    Russia's arms industry is good very good Slava Russia !!!

  • @greyghost61

    @greyghost61

    8 ай бұрын

    Russia can barely run 1 aircraft carrier 😂

  • @kaiser_landschaft7941

    @kaiser_landschaft7941

    8 ай бұрын

    ​@@greyghost61These people create their reality because they do not want to accept that the Russian army is a backward shit.

  • @dutchsailor6620

    @dutchsailor6620

    6 ай бұрын

    @@greyghost61 ...that was build by Ukraine. Slava Ukraine!!

  • @nusplus3985

    @nusplus3985

    6 ай бұрын

    after stealing their biggest ship ever, none shot given in 30 years of posessing, and just one battle tour made, and five own airplanes shot down dead plus one own helicopter shot down - very good, but for others, not for you, hehehe...

  • @user-mn5tv4gb8s
    @user-mn5tv4gb8s9 ай бұрын

    Vamo Darcho Jandreoski Pegasus Galactica 7 Roboterchen - 1976 godina Bronx mjusik neka pushtil Pezo