Love how you used the Russian Assault Class from BATTLEFIELD4 for the thumbnail on US/NATO side

@methcooker6402

Жыл бұрын

Very western yes

@denixgg

Жыл бұрын

Ура что-то про батлфилд4

@NCRtrooper558

Жыл бұрын

Lol yeah

I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks it was a dumb idea to do us and nato and not just nato

@jkjkman8565

Жыл бұрын

Hahahaha so true

@BOSS_KOTLETKA

Жыл бұрын

Nah its interesting to see how much of the NATO military is us

@johndoe35717

11 ай бұрын

Us and Europe are the same thing

@Moonfitz69

11 ай бұрын

@@johndoe35717they ain’t lol

@johndoe35717

11 ай бұрын

@@Moonfitz69 if we get into a war we are.

Иметь технику в арсенале и уметь ей владеть, это разные вещи😉

@brianmck7363

6 ай бұрын

Thank you for being honest..🤟

@BLNH_C_MACLoM

6 ай бұрын

У нас ни то ни другое

@AntonGermanReal

6 ай бұрын

Russia learned that the hard way

@skritmanoriginal7426

6 ай бұрын

Почему то нацистом владение не помогло от сша и ссср, как и нам не поможет сейчас.

@armyan_mafia

6 ай бұрын

@@skritmanoriginal7426 да, вам, хохлонацистам никакая техника НАТО не поможет)

Русский самолёт стоит 10 миллионов долларов, а американский 100 миллионов долларов. Американская техника стоит в 10 раз дороже русской. Поэтому сравнивать военные бюджеты тут не корректно. Если 154 миллиарда умножить на 10, то бюджет российской армии 1,54 триллиона долларов)) 20% российской армии воюет против 51 одной страны НАТО на Украине. Которые туда поставили техники на 500 миллиардов долларов. Это 3 бюджета российской армии. Плюс 1 миллион смелых украинских солдат. Солдаты НАТО и США давно бы в памперсы наложили. Украинские солдаты, кто бы что не говорил, тоже русские. Жаль что стравили оба народа.

@Mc.Drive14

3 ай бұрын

The Russian army has not advanced since 2014 just against the Ukrainian army without mobilizing the people, not like the Russians 😂Having to buy weapons from North Korea 😂 it's really embarrassing.. Russia is already completely surrounded on all sides 😅Without navies or boats, the Ukrainians wiped out a large part of the Russian fleet. You don't want to see the US Navy + NATO on top of that 😂 That would be too easy ✌️ let’s hope that Poutine isn’t so suicidal

Bear + Dragon vs 30 barking dogs.

@nathanielbradford8974

Жыл бұрын

No bear+dragon vs 29 barking and 1 eagle

@Ohlalatay13

Жыл бұрын

@@nathanielbradford8974 the way france and britain remained strong during history and even today says otherwise

@user-vn7wb9nm6d

Жыл бұрын

NATO dogs 🐕 😅

@maxtaylor9237

Жыл бұрын

Bear vs 1 barking dog doesn't seem to be going too well for you atm haha 😅

@ajas41

Жыл бұрын

russia is beyond joke these days. They cant take fcking ukraine. Imagine Nato vs Russia warfare, withouse nukes cause in that way there will be no russia as well. Russia would get wrecked.

It is easy to understand who the aggressor is if you look at the number of offensive and defensive systems. Someone just wants to protect their country.

@reyne6420

Жыл бұрын

The aggression of the country is regarded not by the number of weapons, but by a violation of the UN Charter

@samjack8300

Жыл бұрын

US and Russia both Attack countrys and Not Just protect themselves

@user-rj9vk9lw8v

Жыл бұрын

​@@reyne6420联合国是谁家的？你是来搞笑的

@reyne6420

Жыл бұрын

@@user-rj9vk9lw8v Read my answer again.....

@amidala1789

8 ай бұрын

​@@reyne6420read his again

May I translate and reprint your video on Bilibili?

Increible Solo 2 Paises Son Muy Superiores a Los Mas De 30 Paises De La Otan, Sin Contar Otros Aliados A Rusia Como India, Iran, Corea Del Norte

@bobjunior1121

Жыл бұрын

dumb comment india not russia allies and yeah luxembourg is comparable to china of course and where did you see russia and china superior ? otan is obviously more superior the quantity of soliders dont make an army stronger

@AntiFurry927

9 ай бұрын

Most nato countries are just small states like Lithuania. It’s really France and Britian + USA/Germany vs China and Russia

@fabiopalumbo2788

6 ай бұрын

Because the union make the force. India will never go with Russia an china, also Brazil. Last year Sweden and Finland joined NATO, next will be ukraine

@user-pi5tz7or9n

6 ай бұрын

​@@fabiopalumbo2788hasn’t the realization come yet that either Ukraine will be a non-aligned state, or there will be no state of Ukraine itself?

@fabiopalumbo2788

6 ай бұрын

@@user-pi5tz7or9n It will be an indipendent state. Nato is just a defensive alliance . If one member is attacked every member join to help. Brazil and India and also china will never be against NATO members for one important reason. They earn a lot of money with the commercial routes for Europe and USA . And also a lot of them are living in our countries. In the case of Brazil, a lot of them are descendants of Europeans.

USA and NATO? Like Europe and France? Or India and Mumbai? NATO and QUAD would be more realistic I think.

@totalnerd5674

2 жыл бұрын

There are talks of Vietnam joining QSD/QUAD, which would be pretty funny because NATO would be allied with a communist country in that scenario

@aheat3036

2 жыл бұрын

😂 India & Mumbai? No!

@10birdss

2 жыл бұрын

“Any country becomes a wealthy country if it is friendly with the United States and Japan, and a beggar country if it is friendly with the Soviet Union and China.” This phrase became a Korea proverb in the 20th century.

@gjovalinmhilli325

2 жыл бұрын

No

@voidwalker9223

Жыл бұрын

@@totalnerd5674 communism? do you even know what communism is? Vietnam is a socialist republic. Far from communism.

Все говорит о том что в РФ и Китае оборонительное оружия больше чем наступательного, в отличие от США и блока НАТО.

@andromeda8013

Жыл бұрын

Да, но толку от этого не много

@alekseyeroshenko8335

Жыл бұрын

Потому что мы никогда не на подали в отличии от других стран,СВО исключение рано или поздно не мы так соседи напали.Не зря сейчас многие бывшие президенты хвалятся что Минские соглашения нужны были для укрепления и накачки оружия Украине!

@andromeda8013

Жыл бұрын

@@alekseyeroshenko8335 ну так по итогу Россия на Украину напала

@alekseyeroshenko8335

Жыл бұрын

@@andromeda8013 а выбора не было,8 лет утюжили Донецк!Мирными соглашениями и не пахло,дураку ясно было что на этом запад и Украина не остановилась бы,любой человек знающий историю понимает что сша и запад хочет видит Россию слабой но этого не будет!

@andromeda8013

Жыл бұрын

@@alekseyeroshenko8335 ты в Донецке был то? Ты хотя бы знаешь где этот Донецк находится? Если бы на Россию хотели бы напасть, это произошло бы ещё 90-х, она тогда бы сдалась без единого выстрела. ВС РФ бомбят Херсон, а ВСУ по Донецку хуярят так, как не было за все 8 лет. Ахуенно помогли 👍

Хотелось бы узнать соотношение гиперзвукового оружия. И количество вооружения Ирана и Северной Кореи.

@488ALEX

5 ай бұрын

А какое соотношение вы хотите увидеть? У России "Кинжал" и "Циркон" - максимально приближенные к полноценному гиперзвуку, у остальных пока в процессе разработки.

@rdxedf5923

5 ай бұрын

@@488ALEX Кстати, Кинжал это аэробаллистическая ракета, но способная развивать скорость гиперзвука и таковой считается, ибо ее невозможно сбить. А вот Циркон абсолютно полностью гиперзвуковая ракета

@user-xx7dq9gt4t

4 ай бұрын

​@@rdxedf5923клоун в рашке не могут создать автомобиль не смеши

@rdxedf5923

4 ай бұрын

@@user-xx7dq9gt4t да что ты говоришь, тот же КАМАЗ, Урал и куча других российских марок вполне успешно делается и потребляется. Идут на экспорт и внутренний рынок. Побольше злись, рагуль, у самого страна в заднице, но главное что там в рашке да?

@brokenfingerz3481

3 ай бұрын

@@user-xx7dq9gt4t ты наверное оттуда, раз тебе есть что сказать(хотя я по профилю уже понял, что ты именно оттуда). Интересно посмотреть, как автомобиль принесёт такой же импакт, как ракета. Есть слово такое, "приоритет". Работает в оба конца, да, не отрицаю. А ещё в рашке не могут создать эксклюзивы Apple, да-да, прикинь

You should make a Nato vs BRICS comparison

@Naixel1

Жыл бұрын

Comparing Nato to BRICS is like comparing an apple to meat, BRICS is not a military alliance

You either count USA in NATO or you don’t but you can’t exactly count NATO & the US as separate unless you’re excluding all the recourses the US brings in.

@whatsallintheinternet4281

Жыл бұрын

He counts both but seperates the USA just for fun. For exxample Nato has 20 000 armored vehicle and USA 10 000. He does not mean that it is 30 000. Did you look everytime the Total number??? haha

@ghostwarrior9569

Жыл бұрын

@@whatsallintheinternet4281 3:24 armored vehicles Usa 45193 , Nato (including USA)115855 . Total 161048 3:37 mrap USA 25700 . Nato including USA 27192 .total 52892. 4:46 total aircrafts Russia 4174 . China 3284 . Total 5458 So finde the mistakes And there I stopped to watch this video

@weiningding3166

Жыл бұрын

Need go back to elementary school for maths! Such a dummy, waste lots of natural resources.

@underground5033

Жыл бұрын

@@weiningding3166 can’t even type a correct sentence, seems like you needa go back to school 😂

@DarlintonDilichi

Жыл бұрын

We don't pray war

You counted USA twice in many charts. NATO figure already included US.

@Wizack_Twizack

Жыл бұрын

Nah. Rather USA then nato then total

@Zeraya86

Жыл бұрын

@@Wizack_Twizack but Usa is part of nato, i don't get why the figures are separate.

@carlazar1233

Жыл бұрын

@@Zeraya86 THAT'S HOW THEY CALCULATING THEIR GDP ,PAPERS ARE HARDEST THING IN THE WORLD IT HOLDING A LOTS IF SHIT

@Wizack_Twizack

Жыл бұрын

@@Zeraya86 but they calculating separately first then adding nato without usa. Usa is obviously the biggest part of nato. But nato without usa is also huge.

@eipi5173

Жыл бұрын

Just showing NATO who their Daddy is.

Interesting video

SERBIA RUSIJA FULL VICTO.....

It's easy to see who is preparing for war, and who is simply ready to defend his country.

That’s ridiculous. X amount for usa. X amount for rest of NATO including the USA and proceeds to adding them together 🤦🏻‍♂️

@pebe1900

Жыл бұрын

we dont need alot we have the skills what the dont have

@MV-tf7ev

Жыл бұрын

@@pebe1900 what u on anout

@jmcglinchey2589

Жыл бұрын

I believe its USA excluded from the nato numbers

@jmcglinchey2589

Жыл бұрын

I stand corrected u r rite

@BlooDstorm-um4rj

9 ай бұрын

Its united states and nato . Should be only nato but he doesnt add them . Nato is nato with usa included in the stats given

Rússia não é o Iraque, a Rússia não está lutando somente com a Ucrânia,ela está enfrentando sozinha a Otan.

Think some of the adding up is wrong and things like frigates and submarines is wrong too...still an interesting video

Very cool videos . I’ll subscribe and like . You make nice comparisons and have great data and put effort into what you do .

@habe2833

Жыл бұрын

The data is really really bad....

@mnpipi3329

6 ай бұрын

How do you know if it is good data when you don't know the source?

If this war was based on such statistics, China would not have to fight the United States in the Korean War 70 years ago. At that time, China had neither air force nor Navy. It actually pushed the United States to the south of line 38. As Chinese, we have more say because we are fighting the United Nations. During the Korean War, the US military carried out the best cooperation on sea, air and land. Türkiye's army is the bravest. , they sacrificed themselves and delayed the attack of the 39th army of China. The second American division will be wiped out. The British are also very brave. In the second stage of the battle on the western front of North Korea, the British army was responsible for covering the withdrawal of US troops after rest, while the South Korean soldiers were the least efficient. At that time, the main tactic of our army was to defeat the North Korea army and surround the US Army from the side. A major problem of the US military is its weak will to fight. As long as their logistics are cut off, this is the surrender of the whole system. The strength of Canadian and Australian troops on the Korean battlefield is relatively weak and can be basically ignored.

@user-lo6ei8ys3i

Жыл бұрын

лухта гэты ваш кітай.. як там уйгуры сябе адчуваюць?

@tom_king390

Жыл бұрын

@@user-lo6ei8ys3i Have you been there?

@tom_king390

Жыл бұрын

@@user-lo6ei8ys3i your usa father say alway right😃

@siberianresort5722

Жыл бұрын

@@user-lo6ei8ys3i If you don't know, it is enough to show that your information is closed and false freedom of speech

@StrategicFooyouAgency-dg8yh

Жыл бұрын

@@user-lo6ei8ys3i I am Uyghur, we live very well, the only bad thing is that affected by the epidemic, the income is not high, last year my family only earned about 200,000 US dollars

Nobody knows who has who or what cause it’s the experience and combat training you need and I hope it doesn’t go this far cause they need to resolve this. Well that’s my opinion each his own!

@5:42 you wrote 2,822 Trainer Aircraft for NATO including USA's 2,661, yet you add them again in total, kindly correct it.

I think it’s not how much you have it’s the quality and how you use it !

@derterex6966

Жыл бұрын

speaking as it is at the moment, unfortunately Russian weapons are superior to all analogues in the world, they cope with everyone in the war with Ukraine, although more than 30 countries are fighting there, they all provide assistance in the form of heavy and light weapons, from machine guns to tank planes . NATO and other countries spent more money than Russia, in this war Russia is the clear winner (

@zlonczekk7088

Жыл бұрын

@@derterex6966 and now you can start to laugh

@dreambim2446

Жыл бұрын

@@derterex6966 Superior my ass.

@thatonelocalauthority2809

Жыл бұрын

@@derterex6966 cope and seethe.

@luftim

Жыл бұрын

Nope.... Its about the economy... US with NATO countries hold 60% of all wealth on planet earth... Money wins wars. Erwin Rommel was a genious field marshel for nazi germany, but it did him little with out any equipment.

it is difficult to know exactly the number of war vehicles and aircraft and warships. etc. all countries keep that information secret

apperently the US coast guard didn't get counted in this, as well as the navy ship numbers are a bit off, they do have patrol boats in the navy and though they have no frigates they have alot of cruisers and destroyers

@jimmyv1753

Жыл бұрын

The thing is. This isn’t really how war works. Not since the old days of lining up and firing at each other. Todays wars are far more complex. China holds the production cards and that will be significant. But they also rely on the us for a huge chunk of their revenue. More than they are willing to step away from id bet which is why they’ve never made a legit step against the us or nato. They tip toe around the edges. The best option for everyone is to stop allowing 2 dozen assholes decide for the entire world that we will all kill each other

@hit47n

Жыл бұрын

Also the US has many machines etc that are not “in service.” Many of these machines still operate, including but not limited to some aircraft carriers.

Total submarines for NATO seemed fishy, I checked it, the figure you posted is not the correct one, as USA have 68 and only adding Turkey's 12 submarines that makes 80, ignoring the ones from other countries.

@vladimirvojak3982

9 ай бұрын

😂

... so much wrong with this, half of the time they add the US and NATO together when it already says including the US and for the Tankers they put the A-10 Warthog for the US...

05:11 United States counts 783. Nato (including United States) counts 1200 Total: 1983 i thought it was including ???

@pok1mon999

Жыл бұрын

maths problem😁😁

@luftim

Жыл бұрын

@@user-ut2qu8ji9z Support your self for ones... Stop migrating and help your own country up.

@jmjm1920

6 ай бұрын

No need to count that US airforce alone ahead both combined😅 the biggest killer tanks is nothing 😊

what about the Destroyers and Cruisers?

Seems Finland needs to be included as well from today on, maybe provide an updated video soon?

@EcoZen24

11 ай бұрын

+10 soldiers

all in all,i hope the world will be peace

Infos in the video are chaotic... in some type of weapons usa and nato numbers are combined in others not. NATO and USA nuclear weapons are over 5900 for example... only USA have over 6000 by itself

@HawkyIO

Жыл бұрын

yeah unfortunately he did many mistakes

where is the data source?

Counting looks a bit skewed but should be a good scrap anyway

Where is hypersonic weapon ? lol 😂

@_jenkins_7775

Жыл бұрын

Так оно только у России есть

Bottom line: let's live together 🤝

@bloodpimpgangster

Жыл бұрын

As you name suggests; Absolute Legend.

I didn't know an A-10 Warthog was a tanker

Man, NATO is GOAT

@Quartusdecimus

Жыл бұрын

Without the U.S. of course they are not so)

@CAB11204

Жыл бұрын

@@Quartusdecimus Still, the British, the French, the Italians, and the Germans have some of the best gdp’s and militaries in the world. So yeah, without the US, it’s a big loss to NATO, but it would still be quite powerful

@thatonelocalauthority2809

Жыл бұрын

@@Quartusdecimus Even without the US factored in, NATO would still outperform Russia and China in every way.

@amidala1789

Жыл бұрын

@@CAB11204 🤣

@_jenkins_7775

Жыл бұрын

Сармат, авангард и ярс так не думают)

the fact finland has more reverses than nato they have 900000 reverses

@CagedMuscle1

Жыл бұрын

a good chunk of those reservists do not live in Finland, in order to keep their citizenship they have to do 6 months training as reservists and be called to war if it ever happens

@johnowl6070

Жыл бұрын

@@CagedMuscle1 Do not live in Finland? Damn... Please tell me the source. I suppose some flat earthers or E.T.s told you that?

@CagedMuscle1

Жыл бұрын

@@johnowl6070 my source is a Finland reservist who completed basic training and is an active soldier, Finland goes to war he gets called back. Have a nice day, bud

@johnowl6070

Жыл бұрын

@@CagedMuscle1 Also, many of the reservists have 8, 9, 11 or 12 months of training plus review exercises to top that.

@CagedMuscle1

Жыл бұрын

@@johnowl6070 agreed, I was just stating the basic training

What about destroyers and battleships?

I think some of your numbers are off, for instance submarines. Your figures suggest the rest of NATO has only 10 subs, but the UK has 10 active attack and missile boats, so do the other 28 members have no subs? Also for some of your data, you counted the US twice in the totals!

@artyom3171

2 жыл бұрын

he didn't you could read it there buddy :)

@blademaster2390

Жыл бұрын

@@artyom3171 i think he meant the sections in NATO reading “(in all 30 countries including the US).” Which to be fair, is true, but also makes complete sense, as the US is a founding member of NATO.

@TheLastCrumb.

Жыл бұрын

@@blademaster2390 along with a number of other founding members

@tomasrazo1815

Жыл бұрын

A lot these numbers are off sadly, just for example he has 12k tanks for Russia in both this video and Russia vs. NATO video. But has 7.5k for this video and 20k+ for the other video? Even if it's just negligence on CC part, misinformation is misinformation....

@_jenkins_7775

Жыл бұрын

Even four Borey-class submarines will be enough for Russia

Military forces are not enough to defend the country, while a country defended by the people is invincible.🐻

@GeoGamingNation

Жыл бұрын

One time England sent military to a place in Russia can’t remember the place but the people beat the soldiers of which there were more

@steviewonder7495

Жыл бұрын

Invincible against 50 hypersonic intercontinental nukes travelling through the edge of space at 16000mph, or 50 nukes travelling 100 feet over the north pole ice from russia to usa under radar at 7000mph. The only thing the invincible people can do is bend over and kiss their ass goodbye.

@artmoney2135

Жыл бұрын

@@GeoGamingNation I don’t remember, it’s a cool trick🤣🤣🤣, remember how 200 football fans from Russia piled on your 1000 at the World Cup, then your journalists and congressmen complained that it was not cultural to fuck all British fans on their own soil and that was 200 against the whole of Britain

@elrojo4379

Жыл бұрын

@@GeoGamingNation 1918 in the artic circle, the USA and England invaded Russia to try and stop the "spread " of communism. The war the USA and England try to hide from history because they got their as kicked LoL.

@GeoGamingNation

Жыл бұрын

@@elrojo4379 ikr

Better compare relatively also, based on GDP (economic power).

In Russia 22.000 tanks

Did ya Saw the AT-10 as Tanker 😂

6:10 Why is there a A-10?

Dear video creator , please consider , you've included US twice when you calculate total numbers of military equipments

Sorry but the picture of an A-10 under "Tankers" kinda made me questions the credibility.

1:32 Dont combine all countries together.. you probably dont know what military rank index is. The lower the score the better. You should have just done the "mean" of all the countries

@johnsolis4171

Жыл бұрын

Do it yourself

@kevinzaswd5867

Жыл бұрын

​@@johnsolis4171 Why? Isnt this video supposed to be informing us of military power? They gave us false information so why should I be doing something they supposed to do be doing for me

В России 22.000 танков

I dont get it. If we have it like that so why is a Proxy war being fought then? just curious

@SESEZA23

2 ай бұрын

потому что ядрён-батон

НАКОНЕЦТО ЧЕСТНОЕ сравнение, 2 страны против 31

I was waiting for that video! Great subject!

Dragon and Bear will SMASH Eagle 🐲🐻🤜💥🦅

The new battlefield game should be based on this

وحدها الصين قادرة ان تبيدكم اقتصاديا وعسكريا بغض النظر عن الدول التي تقف مع روسيا 🇨🇳🇰🇵🇩🇿 🇷🇺🇮🇶🇸🇾🇮🇷

the music at 3:16 is the same music that is used in some animated dragon ball super manga's, and it was always an awesome battle theme....definitely an awesome battle theme here too!

@jbqu3142

Жыл бұрын

The music and voice are annoying and hyper boring!

@CodiakLBJfan

Жыл бұрын

@@jbqu3142 so was your mom

@jbqu3142

Жыл бұрын

@@CodiakLBJfan ask your mom why your dad finish making you while urinating, she knows.

@CodiakLBJfan

Жыл бұрын

@@jbqu3142 umad?

Rev 13:2-3: "And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast."

@Devoni_RU

Жыл бұрын

Всё идёт к этому.

@Tazawar24

Жыл бұрын

Do you know what this means?

Homie i am kinda lost watching this. 4:45 4173 from russia and 3285 from china adds up to 5458? what?

Frigates and Corvettes, give me a break. How about missile launching Destroyers or guided missile Cruisers?

doesn't matter what number each country really has. Its WHO has the most experience in real live combat and training.

@lucasschepp6284

Жыл бұрын

It’s who’s bombs hit harder these day sadly

@529frank6

Жыл бұрын

Its WHO has the lowest moral level and act like a shit stirrer in the world.

@adelnogol6499

Жыл бұрын

​@@lucasschepp6284 bcoz of who's keep spreading and building military base everywhere on other people's land.

@noncekilla8848

Жыл бұрын

Russia

@mnpipi3329

6 ай бұрын

Dream on

fr 2 vs 32 countrys

"data first" thumbnail shows russian soldier from the batttlefield 4 game under US/Nato flag

you forgot anti-rocket and anti-aircraft systems :(

Russia prooved, quantity doesnt mean quality

@user-zf3ov8sv6w

5 ай бұрын

Hahhahahahahahhah news sayd?

@EE-dm9uv

5 ай бұрын

You mean the unit of loss?

@user-ws1mr9en3n

5 ай бұрын

Russian using URSS miltary riserve, dont update technology in ukreine

@ich_bin_Pavel

5 ай бұрын

​@@user-ws1mr9en3nСмешно! Русские производят, и производят новую военную тенхнику!

@Trailbuilders_ru

5 ай бұрын

​@@user-ws1mr9en3nalso as Ukrainian forces, who had a lot of old soviet tanks, artillery and aircrafts. Much more than they had got from western countries. But not old USSR reserves nor new western supplies didn't help them.

The total reserve personnel @2:55 for US/NATO is 610 000 Million. 😂

@Akiskycat

6 ай бұрын

The population of NATO and America IS 990Million how they have an army of 610million?

@AndreyPalpatine

5 ай бұрын

С пенсионерами и новорожденным детьми?

Inventario esta correto????

What if asia vs Nato+Usa?

Russia, China,USA .... Bible Nostradamus... 🇷🇺🇨🇳🇺🇸

That would have been a fantastic video had it not had quite a bit of bad info. Carriers for one. How is Russia ranked that high with one out of commission carrier that may never be sea worthy again?

@brianforrester9670

Жыл бұрын

Not only that, but it's diesel powered. US carriers can operate off our shores, in theory, for decades.

@superplaya8

Жыл бұрын

@@brianforrester9670и что будет делать твой авианосец против ракет типа Ярс и Сармат?

@corbanavar4700

Жыл бұрын

Авианосцы это баржи для уничтожения Россией. Если война то кто даст возможность приблизиться на расстояние эффективности истребителей? Эти корыта только для войны с банановыми республиками. Россия один большой непотопляемый авианосец. Россия не собирается идти на США с кораблями. Для США у России есть Авангарды со скоростью 30000 км/ч. И бюджеты неправильно сравнивать в долларах. Россия за 1 миллион доллар создает оружия столько же, сколько США за 10 миллионов долларов.

@cgmaster

Жыл бұрын

@@superplaya8 быстро идти на дно!)

@user-dy6qf5yd5q

6 ай бұрын

А что авианосец реально может. Он страшен только для банановых республик и ножен только морским державам. Россия сухопутная держава, поэтому авианосцы не в приоритете. А сравнивать мощь России и США бессмысленно. Слишком разные доктрины и подход к вооруженным силам. Те операции, на которые способны США, Россия ни когда проводить не будет и наоборот. Прямое столкновение тоже невозможно. Хотя я могу написать сценарий. Год первый, США уверенно побеждают. Армия России находится в руинах. Огромные потери. Год второй. США захватывают значительную часть территории России. Победа близка. Год третий. До окончания войны остаются считанные дни. Российская армия разбита. Год четвертый США подписывают договор о капитуляции и отдают половину всех территорий, а на против Капитолия стоит памятник русскому солдату. Откуда я это знаю? Да по такому сценарию проходили примерно все войны России. Всегда Россия проигрывала, потом приростала территориями. Вот и сейчас сценарий повторяется. СССР развалился, у нас было поражение за поражением на Украине, а к 30 году новая Россия будет по территории больше СССР.

If you ever fill useless, just remember the USA in this video

@Data first, which data? Why do NATO allies such as Japan and Australia are not represented? And why there is no data on transport instrastructure, like roads, telecommunication, ports or airports? How do you win a war in 21st century without massive global hegemony on those parameters? Where is the economic data?

i tell only that: china how old is she? usa? how old is she like country? , whats mean usa? peoples from africa, europe, asia? whats mean china? they have history? america has history? thats why america will fall. god bless all peoples not america.end

If its including US", then you shouldnt count it together again lol.

нато держится только на сша, в то время как Россия и Китай дополняют друг друга

you forgot the Jp…

Air- USA Land - Russia Sea - China

@mdZomi

8 ай бұрын

Land - India Everything - Russia Propaganda - Usa Fake - China

@chitmyataung732

8 ай бұрын

Sea - USA

@mdZomi

8 ай бұрын

@@chitmyataung732 USA is strong in all if they want oil🙄

@LawrenceJohn-rc5zr

8 ай бұрын

bullshit@@mdZomi

@Alone-fx6uh

8 ай бұрын

​@@mdZomiyah that's why they're scared to send F-16 to Ukraine.

That feeling when you need to compare 30 countries with 2 to win.

@MemeGodAzul

Жыл бұрын

To be fair the US carries hard I mean Taiwan is literally a few miles close to China but they'll lose hard to them as a new born country because all countries suck at invading through oceans except for the US.

@struvrim7637

Жыл бұрын

@@MemeGodAzul china have more factory power than whole NATO, so they can build like 100 aircraft carriers and thousands transport if they want also oficial US says only Taiwan is part of China, so US will start war for what? for internal Chinese conflict? It will be second Vietnam but also China have nukes and no one know how many. Their official data is not changing long time, and it’s impossible. They may have more warheads than Russia+NATO

@MemeGodAzul

Жыл бұрын

@@struvrim7637 I don't know if you regret it what you said & deleted your comment but it doesn't show up. I can read it from notifications only. Claim: "China has more factory power than the entirety of NATO." Answer: NATO includes the US, which makes 18% plus 30 members making around 1% amount to 48% of the global manufacturing per year & growing alongside China at 20%. Claim: They (China?) can build around 100 aircraft carriers & 1000s of transport machines. Answer: Most countries can too but it would take 1000s of years to assemble the resources that they possess, including China. The US alone with thousands of diplomatic restrictions still managed to make 10 of the best nuclear supercarriers +1 modern aircraft carrier. They could build 1 aircraft carrier per 10 to 7 years in WW2, currently faster with their current technology if they wanted to, like by 2039 the US will have 11+ & some at 12% done also only countries that have nuclear supercarriers are US & France with 1. Only 6 nations today possess nuclear powered ships most are submarines in the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, and India. Claim: "US will start war over Taiwan? Why?" Answer: The US wants to recognize Taiwan as an independent nation in fact it had previously done so in a list of independent nations but edited it out quickly before antagonizing China further. The US is a diplomatic business so it doesn't want war but friendly trade/relations but it has to, it will defend itself. The US needs Taiwan more than China & it's proving that more & more but if China goes to war with Taiwan the US & some NATO members will go to war (however if China attacks the US first then the entirety of NATO goes to war). Taiwan proves China can be a better place & shares us ideals so the US sees that as impossible to reject & wants more than anything for that nation to spread to take over current corrupt China as a great nation & allied global power because the current reason that China isn't a global power is because US & allies won't let it now it can without fear if China collapses & Taiwan takes over. Claim: "US will cause a 2nd Vietnam." Answer: The reason the US couldn't arm a large force against Vietnam nor many others is because it's restricted by its politics & treaties as such the US ever united together against an enemy country it would take it out quite easily, I don't think China wants to lose diplomatic business with the US they can't afford to also they would lose significant military power because the US can cut around 80% of it's oil supply dropping it below in 100s in global military nowhere near the 10s where it currently is, yes it's that bad for them & now you know why Russia with a lower GDP is ranked 2nd because they actually have natural oil deposits unlike China which will lose hard against any modern military power ranked in the 100s with natural oil deposits. That's why the US runs the show, it has everything because it's the biggest diplomatic national business. Claim: "China may have more nukes than the entire planet combined." Answer: Most credible sources put an estimate of China's nukes at possessing the smallest nuclear arsenal," implying China has fewer than the United Kingdom's 200 nuclear weapons. Several non-official sources estimate that China has around 400 nuclear warheads. So at best 400 with head canon. Lower than 3000 because China plans to build up to that by 2030 to somewhat keep up with the mutually assured destruction treaty. Anything has a possibility but China's possibility to make it the 1st nuclear power is akin to the possibility of Mexico having a higher chance of having a population of 2 billion & been hiding them for millennias. As well as having a full navy, army, air force & superweapons with their military rank have been 2 globally all along in secret, that's more possible. 1 last thing, L.

@SpeedyLiveClips0

Жыл бұрын

ye but most of the NATO countries have dogshit army so

@ivarboneless999sigma7

Жыл бұрын

Nato has just started investing, soo what u see here is NATO in its sleeping state, but ofc u can compare 1 country( USA ) vs 2 countries, and they are still stronger ... Also as Germanys economy itself is more powerfull than Russian, if they were investing as Russia did... Basically u compare 30 countries that dont give a f... with 2 Tryhards

Love your mathematical abilities..

Want to need Russia, china, India vs USA videos

please make Russia and China vs USA pls pls pls pls

It's not money that wins, but smart military and high-quality equipment, weapons, etc., but judging by the amount of money that affects NATO, they were clearly founded not for protection but for attack! 💪🏻🇷🇺

@suckyourdeadnan4805

6 ай бұрын

Your delusional mate 😂

@poppysquarepants

6 ай бұрын

are you brain dead?

@RESPECT35483

6 ай бұрын

Russia num 1 no Doubt 😮😮

@suckyourdeadnan4805

6 ай бұрын

@@RESPECT35483 💀💀💀

@PresidentsPlayhouse

6 ай бұрын

​@@RESPECT35483no way you said that brother

@Data first could you please mention your sources because there were several mistakes i spotted at least about NATO: Total reserve personnel: 1.1 million Tanks: roughly 14,000 Self propelled artillery: 5,040 Towed artillry: 5,495 Fighters: 3,527 Transport: 1,540 Total helicopters: 8,485 Frigates: 135 Corvettes: 56 Submarines: 144 Patrol Vessels: 298 Mine Warfare: 153 There are also several "total" that sum US and NATO( including US) together

@mnpipi3329

6 ай бұрын

It is so frustrating when people do not state their source. I think a lot of people just pull numbers out of their ass

@chrisq2838

5 ай бұрын

@@mnpipi3329 My source was statista, along with Global firepower

@Cryptos222

3 ай бұрын

И складывал, в Excel :))), сколько будет 2+2*2?

А ODKB ?

You should do: USA,Nato,Australia,Japan,Philippines,South Korea,Taiwan,Canada Arabia Vs Russia, China, India, North Korea, Iran, Belarus, Yemen, Serbia, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Algeria.

@iweryyy

10 ай бұрын

Indonesia, South Africa, the Taliban, are with Russia. And Ukraine is with America. Let there be a video made with all the US allies and the Russian Federation!

@Floppanotofficial

9 ай бұрын

Kazakhstan is neutral, but as a kazakh I support Russia

@user-is6tu3rb7p

3 ай бұрын

Аргентина против России, Казахстан, Индия, Бразилия нейтральны

Россия и Китай сильная держава!

@hju6326

Жыл бұрын

false

@PsevdNN

Жыл бұрын

@@hju6326 true

@singning901

Күн бұрын

Да!товарищ!🇨🇳🇷🇺赞同

Damn... Russia has a really powerful military, even though its economy is not as good as USA. Really great job. USA power is only in the air. Comparing with land and sea, Russia and China has more advantage. Not to mention that you're measuring the economy of two countries against multiple countries. The results are actually great for Russia. They say Russia is exhausting its power in Ukraine, but seeing those numbers tells another story. Also, NATO and USA are also paying a lot of money and resources for Ukraine, so it's actually both sides are facing the same conditions.

@user-xx7dq9gt4t

Жыл бұрын

Армия россии это остатки старого хлама от ссср, которого 80% просто не работает

@abel_underwater

Жыл бұрын

“Land” *looks at war in Ukraine* rightttt…🤭😂 I’m Swiss and don’t pick any side, but even I know the US would smoke both Russia/China in Air, Navy, and Army and it’s not even close. Especially the first two….those two separate branches of American military can only beat each other and alone are stronger than entire militaries around the world. Navy would starve out Russia and China, while AF would send both back to the Stone Age in conventional war, then Army/Marines would clean out both Moscow and Beijing. The amount of tech each branch of US military has is mind-boggling, the supplies they’re sending to Ukraine is grinding Russia to a halt, can you imagine if they faced them for real? The stuff they show is so advanced, I can’t even imagine the alien technology they’re hiding.

@otbcmurda7716

Жыл бұрын

Are you crazy? USA navy fleet is bigger than Russia’s. Russia only has 1 carrier and it’s out dated asf. China compares better tbh

@voidwalker9223

Жыл бұрын

Uh the US has the most powerful and largest navy in the world. Jesus you are not educated in modern warfare are you? US has 11 super carriers and largest and most modern destroyer and cruisers and best subs in the world.

@technoartfest8708

Жыл бұрын

@@abel_underwater You mean the NATO armies that lost in Afghanistan and in Syria .. the ones that IRAN bombed US bases in IRAQ? and wounded hundred of soldiers? The one that IRAN stole their best stealth plane and destroyed their most expensive Global hawk drone.. lol that will "smoke China and RUSSIA" in Ukraine? I don't think so.. NATO not only could not win in Syria , they not winning in Ukraine either ,even with all the weapons and intelligence and artillery and training they gave. NATO is already in Ukraine , giving them help with nearly everything NATO have ,including 20,000 nato veterans volunteers and still is losing. There is no way NATO can win a direct full scale war versus Russia , even less China.. Russia have more nukes than All NATO combined.. enough to send to the stone age NATO. and NATO can't intercept hypersonic missiles . lol So none of that tech is going to help you defeat Russia missile forces , superior submarine force and superior hypersonic missiles and more powerful nukes too. . Just one hypersonic missile ,armed with a nuke , would send 100 to 200 warships ,and entire fleet , of NATO to the button of the sea. So NATO will never dare to fight directly ,a fight they know they cant win. Russia and CHina are too strong for even NATO capabilities.

Was an interesting video but as soon as you made the first mistake at the populations, see ya...

Might wanna double check some of your math there skipper :P

Dude, can u calculate right? Total Aircraft Russia+ China 4173+3285=5458???? I found couple mistakes...

I saw so many mistakes in this one....urrggg

Why "USA and Nato" if USA is already part of Nato? You mean 2× USAs and the rest of Nato or what?

@Leeedy_1

Жыл бұрын

He means USA and *the rest of* Nato

@chiarnustiucenumesaaleg1136

Жыл бұрын

@@Leeedy_1 Wasn't enough to say just Nato?

I laughed when it said leader and Joe Biden picture came up

Ufff si se enfrentan esas potencias el mundo colapsa

🇷🇺🇨🇳

Regardless of who pairs up with whom, the next global war will b fought with strategic bombers, fighters, missiles of all types, and aircraft carriers. Troop numbers, tanks, etc not so important as previous wars.

@Hayabusa-lo6bc

2 жыл бұрын

Short-range ballistic missiles, ICBMs, strategic bombers and elite military units that are incredibly trained are in the 21st century.

@aheat3036

2 жыл бұрын

That’s exactly where the USA & NATO have the advantage!

@gunterodim1535

2 жыл бұрын

@@aheat3036 China will soon be able to simply buy NATO. Or blackmail with sanctions. No one will even fight ...

@whicker59

2 жыл бұрын

@@aheat3036 let's just pray Bundling Biden doesn't hurt us too badly until real american first leadership returns.

@steviewonder7495

2 жыл бұрын

Not so important, just 8 billion peoples lives at stake when tempers flare and 20,000 worldwide nukes come out to play from 16 nuclear countries.

China..Russia and North Korea VS nato ..USA.. Japan.. South Korea and many more countries..this would be tuff

Bruh what is that thumbnail like you couldnt find a pic of an american soldier this is a russin assaulter from the game Battlefield 4