"Tell him about the shadow, Bill!" "I SAH UH SHADOE."

This is the funniest thing lmao "I saw a shadow"

@Yal_Rathol

7 жыл бұрын

UGSETH2 my laughter comes from the fact that shadows is how we find exoplanets. if a star suddenly dims out in the sky, that means something blocked it. if it does it again and again in a rythm, that means orbit. which means _there's a planet there burnie_.

@xXAscendingPhoenixXx

7 жыл бұрын

^Triggered.

I don't know why people think Burnie cares about science. After all he's Burnie Burns: Atom Smasher

@waterwind2266

3 жыл бұрын

@TheVoiceOfTruth Aww is the little Trumpette cranky? Drink your kool-aid, you'll feel better you immediate danger.

The way Burnie says: "It looks like a dog!" Still brings a smile to my face

@135mikerules23

7 жыл бұрын

Jesse Potma Thanks, I think?

@135mikerules23

7 жыл бұрын

Jesse Potma happy to help

@rparker069

7 жыл бұрын

"it looks like a dawg"

I can actually see Church making this argument on Red vs Blue

@kyletanking

5 жыл бұрын

Then Simmons’s or tucker try’s to explain it

@Defectum138

4 жыл бұрын

Kyle Tanking definitely Simmons. He’s the nerd

It rains diamonds sideways! Or was it glass. Glass diamonds?

@matthewmac5787

6 жыл бұрын

i think it was rain glass sideways and it was made of diamonds to the core

@defrozendonut8715

4 жыл бұрын

matthew mac two different planets one rains glass sideways cause of the high amount of silica in the atmosphere the other is a planet completely made of diamond

Matt: fanfare Burnie: no fanfare

this is why Burnie isn't a scientist lol

@thevideogamenerd100

7 жыл бұрын

Well, he is a scientist in Immersion but that still doesn't count lol

@kittygamer797

4 жыл бұрын

Burnie Burns adom smasher!

@user-mz1bi4xz6r

3 ай бұрын

He’s not wrong though, lmao. They don’t know shit. Speculation is speculation.

@cobalt6014

2 ай бұрын

@@user-mz1bi4xz6rwe don’t know anything for sure even our vision isn’t for sure so that argument isn’t really valid

Salty Burnie is the best Burnie.

Burnie either doesn't understand the length of our solar system, or he doesn't know how long a light year is.

@pforgottonsoul

7 жыл бұрын

isn't he also the one who said electricity is bullshit? i think he just has a grudge against science.

@EwenVRC

7 жыл бұрын

patrick watkins well his parents nun and a ghost

@jonathanhart54

7 жыл бұрын

patrick watkins I thought he said airplanes are bullshit

@deathab0ve

7 жыл бұрын

I don't remember him calling electricity bullshit and that is a real big reach for Burnie to say. He may have said it jokingly. Also Thicks he doesn't need to know the length of our solar system. We have been told galaxies are X light years away. We also know the solar system is round So if something passes X that means the it must be outside the solar system or else we would be colliding with another galaxy.

@thicks7454

7 жыл бұрын

Mike Sico I interpreted his rant on NASA's number of planets in our solar system as him thinking that the new planet was discovered *in* our solar system, to which I made the comment, because Burnie also stated that the planet was 150 light years away, which would undermine his argument if he thinks that NASA is claiming this planet is in the sun's orbit.

I like astronomy, I like Burnie, I have mixed feelings about this

Thank you for all your hard work in uploading recently! Just came home from a really shit day to 4 of these and it made me so much happier. Keep doing what you love as it is changing countless viewers live's for the better daily!

Seriously though, I'd like to dig down to that Happy Meal layer.

NASA only has the budget to observe 3% of the sky.

@Dorianin1

6 жыл бұрын

Nope, that's just how much the deep field observations have covered so far. In that 3% we've discovered thousands of planets.

@zonalklism

6 жыл бұрын

That's because the sky is bigger than the ground.

@TheNinthGenerarion

4 жыл бұрын

Drosta Dorianin not just thousands of planets, but billions of trillions of galaxies made of billions of stars each likely have at least one planet but likely more than that, usually around 4-10 planets

“It looks like a DOG” why does Burnie sound like Danny Devito?

I watch this EVERY TIME a new exoplanet appears

Where can i find that rvb posters in the background??

The nice thing about a planet 130 million light years away is that it doesnt move (releative to us in any meaningful capacity. It takes a million years for it to move an inch in our sky), and it doesnt get stuck behind things... planets in our solar system do

Burnie doesn't understand science.

@4blanton

7 жыл бұрын

Lucas VerBeek okay, explain the exact process of which NASA finds out what an extremely distant planet is made up of. I'm just really curious (this is not bait).

@SaintBigfoot

7 жыл бұрын

That is a very long and complicated process with many seperate facets. The NASA website can explain it better then I ever could.

@Dirtyblue929

7 жыл бұрын

I know next to nothing on the subject so the best I can offer is a potentially-misinformed layman's version, but... Basically because light is, technically, a form of radiation, they can use spectrometers to measure the light that the planet is reflecting. By comparing the results to known elements on earth, they can determine the basic elemental makeup of the planet. From there it's a matter of applying astrophysics, geology, and all that other bullshit to the data in order to form a basic idea of what conditions on the planet are like - i.e., they take baby steps, putting the little bits they can directly measure into equations that let them predict what they can't directly meausre. So, while Burnie's right in that there's no way of telling RIGHT OFF THE BAT if the planet has a surface of magma that flows in weird circles with a layer of carbon underneath, they can EXTRAPOLATE that it does based on the information that they CAN tell off the bat.

@IrulewithLucas

7 жыл бұрын

Dirty Blue Based on the light they're receiving, there's no way for them to make such a detailed report. They aren't physically seeing this planet, just finding it based on changes in arrays of light passing through (color distortions, shadows, etc.). Them being able to conclude it's a planet covered in lava with a layer of carbon underneath can not be reached through simple spectroscopy. The only thing that would make sense here really is if they were able to determine its covered in a "lava-esque" substance and that in order for that to be possible there must be a layer of carbon underneath, yet that still doesn't make much sense (at least to me, I'm not a chemist though)

@chase5833

7 жыл бұрын

I mean it's a pretty simplistic report. They're basically saying molten surface with carbon layering on the interior. The flow of the lava can then be determined by thermodynamics and examples of lava flow on earth. Also, something cannot be "lava-esque". Lava just means molten rock, there is no one specific makeup of lava

1:06 Wait... is that Space Kid from Camp Camp?

Wasn't Burnie's dad a physicist?

@Lazyspaceout

Жыл бұрын

Yes he was

Burnie: I don't understand this thing so I'm gonna talk shit about it.

I'd love to see Neil DeGrasse Tyson as a podcast guest with Burnie.

@TheYoshi115

4 жыл бұрын

You do know he's not a real scientist, right?

@defrozendonut8715

4 жыл бұрын

Josue' Tapia who Tyson or Burnie cause Neil is a astrophysicist

I don’t know how anybody could make an observation like that when the light that they are seeing to see that planet is 150 years old it took 150 years to get to them

Bill looks like space kid from camp camp

damn you went ham today

Who else notice that the nasaguy#2 looks like Space kid from Camp Camp? (Sorry for my bad english)

Oh Barbara why?

@moemillion1

5 жыл бұрын

Zero_Kent I was trying to find this comment

@NerdOnTheStreet

2 ай бұрын

Burnie: Goes on a rampage in favor of defunding NASA. Gavin: "Why would Barbara do this?"

"Not never" there is a 0% chance that we will ever go to that fucking planet

@TheEssentialHughJazz

7 жыл бұрын

Even if we could we wouldn't want to because it's COVERED IN LAVA

@Yal_Rathol

7 жыл бұрын

ProbablyInsane "we" as in anyone alive today? yeah, no. "we" as in humanity? I wouldn't be so certain. generation ships are a possibility.

@brandonparnell6160

6 жыл бұрын

ProbablyInsane We have if you count dozens of probes

@Ghilliebandits

6 жыл бұрын

Well Ftl travel is still theoretically possible with the use of gravity well manipulation. So if we somehow did manage to achieve said technology in our lifetime then it is entirely possible.

Bill looks like space kid.

i like that one of the scientists is space kid

You know what would be a twist, what if that shadow that Nasa claim they saw was one massive alien ship

Boi you work fast

@scheissetreppenwitz369

6 жыл бұрын

What do you mean?

God I miss Burnie!

Burnie, I love you man, but God you have literally no idea wtf you're talking about

@asia246222

7 жыл бұрын

lvn nvk I could techno babble at you, but I think I've got the perfect metaphor. Without using a mirror, tell me what the tip of your nose looks like. It's right in front of your eyes, so it should be easy, right? Easier than describing your toes, which are much further from your eyes by default. But you can look at your toes in a way you can't with the tip of your nose. That lack of distance is a problem, not a benefit. That's what it's like trying to use the same tech we use to examine exo-planets with on our own solar system. Hope this helped! :)

@Luissv72

7 жыл бұрын

*****​​ we can't see the planets near us because there's no light around them, we can't see them. There's light going off of planets hundreds of light years away because they have their own stars. The key is light

@Yal_Rathol

7 жыл бұрын

lvn nvk exoplanets are located when they pass between the star and us, interrupting the light in a semi-regular pattern. that light is how we measure what they're made of, what color they are and how much mass they have (gravitational lensing is a whole 'nother kettle of fish, so unless you really wanna know, we'll leave it be). this technique doesn't work so well when you're closer to the star than the planet you're trying to see. you have to point your telescope at the sky and hope you get a lucky shot of light bouncing off the planet and at you. this is why mercury, venus, mars and jupiter were the first planets discovered, because venus and mercury are between us and the sun, mars is super close and jupiter is stupidly big and bounces a lot of light.

@rayd2kill839

5 жыл бұрын

@@Yal_Rathol That's one of the reasons NASA scientist's came up with as to why we are unable to see the planet 9 they keep saying is real. I could be wrong about this but they hypothesized that it had a huge orbit and is so far away that it reflects hardly any of the suns light, and that due to the huge orbit it takes a very long time for it to come close enough to reflect enough light to become noticeable.

@lyinsroar9637

5 жыл бұрын

that's why it's funny lmao

i fund it funny in general that people who don't understand the sunject matter will usually belitle it as useless or insignificant

Obviously, there are 13 planets: 1. Mercury 2. Venus 3. Earth 4. Mars 5. Jupiter 6. Saturn 7. Uranus 8. Neptune 9. Pluto 10. Lucifer 11. Metis 12. Kaminatsuki 13. Jupiter 2 And of course, there's also our Sun's companion star: "Nemesis". Is anyone gonna get the reference? Unfortunately, probably not. (Source: kissanime.ru/Anime/Gunbuster-Science-Course/Special-006?id=40517)

Funny enough, NASA announced that there is in fact a 9th Planet in our Solar System. Planet X as it is currently known as for the moment.

next up: burnie explains how magnets work Burnie: Who gives a shit. They're magic.

Bill looks like he might be related to Space Kid.

#BurnieForNASACreative

Lmaoooo my boy does not understand astronomy at all

I grew up with 9 planets . but now it's 8 😧

@scheissetreppenwitz369

6 жыл бұрын

A lot of people did.

@ElPayasoMalo

5 жыл бұрын

They fucking HAD to define planet to exclude Pluto. They had found a tenth "planet" called Eris beyond Pluto, and then they discovered like thousands of similarly sized "planets." The only way to fix this was to define the word "planet" to exclude really small bodies like Pluto, because who wants to remember a thousand word mnemonic? How long can you stretch a sentence about your excellent mother getting pizza? Screw that. I'd have have eight names to memorize than thousands.

@LeonGun8

5 жыл бұрын

They still found evidence that the influence of a ninth planet exists (but have yet to find it). But yeah, now you have one new thing to learn at school: dwarf planets.

@TheNinthGenerarion

5 жыл бұрын

ElPayasoMalo the actual definition says that it needs to be the largest celestial body in its orbit, and Pluto’s moon Charon is barely smaller than it to the point that they orbit each other while going around the sun, every dwarf planet shares its orbit with other similar sized objects

Awwwe. It’s space kid

my fav person here is Bill

NASA discovers water on the fucking moon this week

Why don't they hire you to do this and pay you for it lol.

He realizes that exoplanets that are close to their stars are brighter than the most distant objects in our own solar system?

Damn Hembo, slow down man

@scheissetreppenwitz369

6 жыл бұрын

What do you mean?

@joshchen8679

2 жыл бұрын

@@scheissetreppenwitz369 I think Zeal Zest mean Hembo is upload too many, too fast.

Nostalgia :-/

@DUBUND3AD

4 ай бұрын

Facts

@TazyBaby

3 ай бұрын

Do you think it’s that everything actually is worse now or that we just viewed it through rose colored glasses at the time?

@MadScientistGuild

3 ай бұрын

@@TazyBaby well for rooster teeth it’s worse hell it’s over. For the rest of us it doesn’t matter if it’s better or worse the past is an immutable point in our timelines it has all the joys or sorrows bound to it already so tho our past cannot change our perception can. So even the darkest days of our past can offer us comfort. But yeah corporations grip over us is much worse now a days.

Bernie, it took years to find Pluto. And we knew it was there because a small dot moved a cm in the 1920s. Space is huge and planets move fast.

@brandonparnell6160

6 жыл бұрын

Ethan Steffek The first photographic evidence of pluto was in the mid to late 90's

@matthewmac5787

6 жыл бұрын

also light moves in time it's not instant when we see a planet far away were seeing it as it was a thousand year's ago close up it can take hour's or minutes to see them

My Science teacher actually brought this up and I so badly wanted to say something for Burnie but I couldn’t 😔

I also get the fact that any new exoplanet discovery is amazing. Like every new earth-like planet sounds awesome with new life probably there but at this point in time, we dont have the tech to reach there fast enough or to even make it at all to be absolutely sure. So until NASA gets some better funding or they manage to collaborate with other organizations, i bet we wont be going anywhere any time soon.

Burnie are you fucking serious right now? That's how NASA can tell what's in other planets

*Bernie makes hypothetical situation in which NASA dosent know the amount of planets in our solar system* * Proceeds to use said situation as an actual point in the rant*

@relic5752

5 жыл бұрын

Not a hypothetical, actual debates as to the existence of a ninth planet

This is the same guy who paid 200 bucks for a plastic triangle to stick on his forehead

VIVA LA PLUTO!

And this is what scientific ignorance sounds like.

burnie science pls

I miss church. he's somewhere but isn't here right now.

Still get annoyed at Burnie just being dense and thinking he’s right because he doesn’t understand concepts.

@amitkenan3878

Жыл бұрын

i know right. Church is an exact copy of him

@maxhowlett9661

8 ай бұрын

I think he understands, his point is that it's pointless and borderline meaningless when you actually think about it. This stuff is so far out there, so far away that it just doesn't matter to the average human.

This man created Red vs. Blue, everyone.

@scheissetreppenwitz369

6 жыл бұрын

Technically....

wow america right?

Hahahaha even though burnie is wrong, I ACTUALLY dont care. He makes it so damn funny it still makes me cry of laughter everytime 😂

So painful to listen to this lol. I love you Burnie, and you're hands down my favorite content creator on the internet. That aside, in this particular situation, your inability to grasp the science behind it is NOT a valid argument against it.

@websterri

4 жыл бұрын

No its not. They have talked about this before and they totally understand the science behind it. What he is saying is that 1. Its stupid that they make such a big deal out of such hypothetical nonsense and, 2. That they waste so much time and money on things that could never matter to us at all, especially since we have so much to figure out about things at "home".

@intoxigamer3617

3 жыл бұрын

@@websterri Nope, you're deliberately changing Burnie's words to make him sound less dumb in this case. Not gonna work. Anyone can just scroll up and listen to his words again.

@websterri

3 жыл бұрын

@@intoxigamer3617 Bullshit. Maybe you should open your ears and take your own advice.

@supergirl7717

3 жыл бұрын

@@websterri I agree with you

@TheGenericDavis

Жыл бұрын

​@intoxigamer3617 How does knowing the elemental makeup of the planet allow them to interpret what is going on underneath the surface of said planet? Because I've normally only heard spectrometry used to project what the atmosphere of these planets would be composed of.

Doesn't matter if it's uneducated, still funny!

I know I’m going to attempt to work at a Home Depot in Austin but like... how many are there? Does RoosterTeeth have a specific Home Depot they go to? Will I see them? Who will show up and would I recognize them? Oh well. Either way, I cannot top my dad shaking Chuck Norris’s hand. Everyone in my house but me has met a famous person but me! “You need to go out more.” Like I’m going to see Leonardo DeCapreo(?) in our driveway.

I am concerned for humanity because of the comments from this video. Burnie isn't saying that NASA IS A HOAX! He's saying that the people at NASA should worry about deciding the number of Fucking planets in the Solar System before it researches a planet that we will most likely never reach.

@matthewmac5787

6 жыл бұрын

well you have to remember that light only travels so fast and while we can see a planet far away as it was a thousand year's ago thing's in our solar system takes hour's to get to us and is closer so it's harder to angle the Hubble telescope to catch it while planet's far away we have to keep it only focused in one place and magnify the zoom to catch the whole solar system in that area

@gagejohnathan9641

2 жыл бұрын

@@matthewmac5787 so basically the informations already out of date by the time it reaches Hubble.

@matthewmac5787

2 жыл бұрын

@@gagejohnathan9641 the more you learn about the universe, the more you realise the speed of light is horrifyingly slow. If I remember right it takes light around 4 years to reach the closest star too us Alpha centauri.

People are getting mad at Burnie because he "doesn't understand science". It's not that he doesn't understand it. It's entirely aside the point. The fact that there was a controversy for years about what the planetary terminology for Pluto is makes all of NASA's search for planets outside of the Milky Way seem absurd. Let's figure out our own solar system first before we move beyond it.

@xXAscendingPhoenixXx

7 жыл бұрын

You're the only one in the comments that gets it. Its pretty sad.

@RedshiftButterfly

7 жыл бұрын

I don't think Burnie was talking about Pluto. There is evidence to suggest that there is another planet (a real planet) within our solar system. But we haven't found it yet. It's actually a lot easier to find extra solar planets than it is to find local ones. This is because we've found all the ones close to the Sun, whereas the extra solar we're detecting are usually close to their star, and we can use the star as an observation tool. The further out you get (and the smaller the object), the harder they are to see. There will be many objects around these stars that we are not yet detecting. It's perfectly logical that we're learning about other systems before we finish learning about our own. Besides, studying other systems can provide useful insights into our own. Also the Milky Way is our galaxy. You might want to edit that part out. Detecting extra galactic planets is beyond us right now. But yeah, Burnie isn't an astronomer. No need to get mad about it.

@Mezuzah87

6 жыл бұрын

That's quite a bit of stupid you got there, congrats.

@Dorianin1

6 жыл бұрын

Moron. There was no controversy about Pluto, it was controversy about what would define a planet. Based on the new accepted definition, Pluto was not a planet. I lost a ton of respect for RT because of this blatant display of utter ignorance. Incidentally, a planet must A) be large enough to become a sphere from it's own gravity, B) orbit the barycentre of the containing system, and C) have swept it's orbit clean of debris in it's orbit. Pluto, Ceres, Haumanake, etc, do not meet C. And yes, a great deal of information can be gathered by knowing an exoplanets orbit, size, and proximity to it's star. Including some gross details of it's interior composition. Fucking ignorance. Stick to video games, because it's what you understand. Rant over.

@puglystudios94

6 жыл бұрын

Looking in on a solar system is a lot easier because you can actually see the planet casting a shadow, while we can only see darkness.

I have to agree with Burnie here. I mean it's gonna be decades or possibly centuries before we could have space travel to even visit these worlds. Nobody here on Earth currently (except maybe small children/babies) will be around to see it. So what's the point?! XD

@Yal_Rathol

5 жыл бұрын

two things. 1, studying exoplanets allows us to learn about our own solar system. for example, we've seen planets and stars with accretion disks, that tells us that our theories of how the planets, moons and solar system formed are correct. 2, there might be aliens, and if there are, they might be beaming out messages that we can pick up and learn from. if an advanced alien species is out there and it's beaming it's scientific data into space like we are, we could jump forward decades by studying their information and learning from it rather than having to come up with every idea ourselves.

@SynchronizorVideos

2 жыл бұрын

@@Yal_Rathol You forgot one: 3, Space stuff is cool.

idk why burnie was saying that about that planet ?

To be fair, it is odd that NASA can detect the composition of exoplanets 100's of light years away, but we still aren't sure if there's a "Planet 9" that's bigger than Earth that orbits in the Kuiper Belt. I mean that "Planet 9" would be millions if not billions of times closer to us than some of the exoplanets they're documenting.

@matthewmac5787

6 жыл бұрын

well you have to remember that light only travels so fast and while we can see a planet far away as it was a thousand year's ago thing's in our solar system takes hour's to get to us and is closer so it's harder to angle the Hubble telescope to catch it while planet's far away we have to keep it only focused in one place and magnify the zoom in

@kalen1702

6 жыл бұрын

matthew mac True, the exposure is an issue, it just seems like we should be able to at least detect proof of another object that close to us by other means. Especially since we can detect minor gravitational anomalies over much greater distances, ya feel

@matthewmac5787

6 жыл бұрын

yea but with all the other planet's in our solar system and the 2 asteroid belt's most other thing's in our solar system is hidden behind a bunch of static and billions of rock's they think there is a planet and there calling it planet X (yes i know a very complex and interesting name that must have taken hour's to name)

@LeonGun8

5 жыл бұрын

They have detected proof, they just can't find it. This proof was detected over a century ago in fact, but they stopped looking once Pluto was found because they thought Pluto WAS the ninth planet. Then they found more tiny planets like Pluto and went "well shit, it wasn't Pluto" and the search began again.

Burnie using the logic of "I don't understand this, that means NO ONE can understand this!" Doesn't try to educate himself, he gets a question in his head and because he cant answer it with the knowledge he already has, he declares it un-answerable and never tries to learn how this discoveries are made, which is information that EASILY available, especially for someone like Burnie. This is just like when people say bullshit like "if evolution is true, why are there still monkeys?! Why aren't there new Neanderthals?!" and they think they just destroyed the argument for evolution.

@t.c.thompson2359

2 жыл бұрын

Also, people need to stop saying "scientists" as a catch for all scientific disciplines, guess what idiot, the people that study deep space are NOT the same people that study the oceans, and the study of space has ALOT more funding that the study of the deep ocean, so it is going to get discoveries more often.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson, please own this fool!

hopefully Burnie isn't one of those Flat-Earth people

@Yal_Rathol

7 жыл бұрын

Jonathan Pascual he isn't. he just has no idea how spectrographic analysis works or how we detect planets in and out of our solar system and how those have _NO FUCKING CONNECTION GODDAMMIT_.

@jonathanpascual5353

7 жыл бұрын

i can't tell if your mad at me or burnie but ok! besides i was only making a small joke

@Yal_Rathol

7 жыл бұрын

Jonathan Pascual i'm mad at burnie, and i'm mostly joking too.

I mean, NASA would have more funding than having said writing department if we...y'know, *gave them funding at all.* But I think I'll just avoid THAT potential landmine.

Hmm... I understand the skepticism, but there is actual science behind the claims NASA makes. Burnie is surprisingly arrogant, which is weird because he is usually so informed.

@gr33nriver77

7 жыл бұрын

Space-Man Ew anime garbage

You guys do realize he’s just clowning, right? Everybody is triggered and suddenly has a Degree in astronomy. 🤣🙄

@MrHotSalsa

5 жыл бұрын

People just want to feel smart on the internet. Burnie is just wildin'.

@LeonGun8

5 жыл бұрын

I do wonder if he actually is though. This is the same man who raged about how Austin is the only city in the world with constant construction. Beause obviously the poor citizens of Austin are the only ones who have ever suffered the blight known as poor construction policies and unending city projects.

@deviloframadi4045

5 жыл бұрын

LeonGun8 Are you trying to be a douche? I can’t tell. If you don’t like Bernie, why watch his videos? This is all just in good fun.

nasa isnt bullshit.

Gavin is right Planet X is coming very slowly but it's still coming

NASA: we found this planet that's made of pure diamonds! A chunk will devalue all diamonds we sell here in earth! Me: that sounds amazing! Tell me about how are your plans for colonizing the moon or mars coming along.

@brandonparnell6160

6 жыл бұрын

Fuyu_Seishin12 To bad they only have 54 million dollors a year in there buget 1% of the USA's total buget maybe move that up to 2% maybe and a few other programs while your at it

@Dorianin1

6 жыл бұрын

Diamonds aren't rare on Earth. The price is artificially inflated through stockpiling and careful management of mining rights.

@Ghilliebandits

6 жыл бұрын

Planetary landing for nasa have been entirely halted do to the loss of interest a few years after the Cold War. Funding dropped and government support dwindled. NASA budget is nothing compared to what it used to be. That’s why private companies are shooting for it. Hell the past 10 years has been a mass exodus of nasa researchers to these private companies assisting in the research of said technology.

@gundampeacekeeper

6 жыл бұрын

Well they can’t do much when they have a tenth of the budget that we had to go to the moon dipshit

@gundampeacekeeper

6 жыл бұрын

Fuyu_Seishin12 they would honestly love to

How does no one understand that he's complaining about NASA's integrity when they're trying to show us these ridiculously detailed and convoluted planets so far away but they can't decide on what is a planet or not. He didn't need any science for that just the facts that NASA can't focus on cementing what's in our solar system before trying to look at fancy planets

@matthewmac5787

6 жыл бұрын

the thing is though you have to remember how bloody huge our solar system is and we have a giant layer of asteroids surrounding our outer edge so its hard to tell close up (in our galaxy way anyway)thing's but it's easy for thing's far away since with how fast light travels were seeing planets how they were probably a thousand year's ago those planet's probably don't even exist anymore while in our solar system were seeing thing's how they were hour's before so it's hard to tell

He has a point

@screenname_jpeg1478

7 жыл бұрын

KasHxJay He doesn't know the science behind how they find out all of that stuff. There really isn't a point

@Yal_Rathol

7 жыл бұрын

KasHxJay no, he doesn't. because he doesn't understand the disconnect between the media reporting nasa discoveries and the actual papers written on them. he also doesn't understand spectrographic analysis or gravitational lensing, meaning any point he might have is lost due to him not knowing what he's on about.

@brandonparnell6160

6 жыл бұрын

KasHxJay If he did have a point is don't make any sense to us

@Dorianin1

6 жыл бұрын

His point is he appallingly ignorant about anything that isn't video games.

and yet Burnie is the kind of person who would get super triggered at a climate change skeptic smh...

@thewerewolff7248

5 жыл бұрын

Zach Thomas I mean cause those people are idiots. Climate change is happening on earth it’s easily proven. Not easy for NASA to show that what they’re saying is true since it’s on whole other planets

I think everyone is taking him wrong. I don’t think he’s saying it’s bullshit what nasa is saying about the planet. I think he’s more annoyed that nasa knows all that about a planet so far away but they don’t know what’s going on in our own solar system. Maybe idk lol

@LeonGun8

5 жыл бұрын

He's still totally off-base if that's the case. It's harder to see what's closer to our star than planets in other star systems. That's why NASA sent the Voyagers to take pictures of the solar system and currently worked on sending a solar probe to the orbit of Mercury to observe the Sun and learn more about it.

I mean, to be honest, there's way too much BS in the general astronomy field. To say that you can tell that a planet is clearly raininh diamonds in a sideways position, or to talk about the core of a planet that you said the atmosphere is too thick and dark to see through- there's something amiss. And yes, I am saying that scientists aren't right all the time, and that there's alot of exaggeration in the descriptions. They are human, and to a lesser extent, in a business. You can say "Well, you're not a [insert job here]," but that's like saying that someone who hasn't worked as a mechanic isn't possibly able to question the summary of their report. Alot of mechanics lie for more things to charge on, and many know this without being a mechanic.

Can we all agree that both are true: (a) NO ONE on the RT Podcast has ever demonstrated a firm grip on high school levels of science in any field and (b) the majority of "science" that filters down to the popular culture from government institutions is an even mix of myth, guesswork, lobbyist marketing, overstatements, and watered down half facts? In this case Bernie is simultaniously totally off base and strangely on to something.

@LeonGun8

5 жыл бұрын

The news tend to water down the "science"and only read the highlights. Understandable since this kind of reports are hundreds of pages long.

Does Burnie realize that an exoplanet is outside our solar system therefore the amount of planets in our solar system hasn't changed and he just isn't aware

@waterwind2266

4 жыл бұрын

You've totally missed the mark - that is not at all what he said. He said it's ridiculous that they can supposedly know so much about a planet thousands of lightyears away, but apparently know so little about our own solar system.

@lmlrenzomcmeme2861

4 жыл бұрын

@@waterwind2266 mad

@waterwind2266

4 жыл бұрын

@@lmlrenzomcmeme2861 Excellent rebuttal, you must have spent hours crafting that.

@lmlrenzomcmeme2861

4 жыл бұрын

@@waterwind2266 took you long enough

Y’know, the people that say Pluto isn’t a planet are idiots. I mean, there’s a reason it’s called a dwarf PLANET. Giving it the “dwarf” in name doesn’t make it any less of a PLANET. Unrelated, I know, just figured I could say that real quick.

@LeonGun8

5 жыл бұрын

Er, it may have the name "planet" on it but it's a different beast altogether. Dwarf planets are small rocks of ice that orbit the sun. There's hundreds of dwarf planets in the solar system, which is why Pluto went from being our "ninth planet" to being "just one piece of rock amongst hundreds of similar rocks".

Wonder if Elon Musk is gonna shoot Burnie’s Tesla into space as payback

Third?