We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

The shade would be worth something if Rolex actually sold watches.

@2steaksandwiches665

Жыл бұрын

This. Rolex is simply a tangible commodity investment. It’s not even a watch anymore.

@renatoazevedo9514

Жыл бұрын

😂

@hunterstrawberry4220

Жыл бұрын

💀

@Futokuko

Жыл бұрын

Don’t worry, The collapse of Chinas middle class will soon allow for list free purchases as the grey market gets flooded.

@ocb05

Жыл бұрын

@@2steaksandwiches665 not even a worthy investment anymore as well

ahhh Omega!!! a brand that is both More Swiss and British than Rolex has ever been, a brand that has been both to the moon and the deepest part of the planet... and a brand that is a staple in the Dirty Dozen. Long Live Omega

@Tacteyecool

Жыл бұрын

Maybe if we actually been to the moon it would be cool

@SB-Kiwi

Жыл бұрын

​@@Tacteyecoolthe moon is flat

@reza313_

11 ай бұрын

@@SB-Kiwi and the Earth is dodecagon

@famts3716

9 ай бұрын

@@TacteyecoolAHSAHSHAH

If I ever need a deep sea watch to strap on to my deep sea submarine, I have options.

“Strenuous award ceremonies” It’s a miracle the poor guy survived those.

@Apex-rl4fb

Жыл бұрын

F

@michaelriera6277

Жыл бұрын

Typical celebrity rubbish.

@Strideo1

Жыл бұрын

He played it safe and never made any jokes about Jada Pinkett Smith.

Falling into a swimming pool is all that most dive watches will ever need to survive. I imagine Omega will win this tool-waving contest, because it will actually be able to be purchased in stores.

@almac9203

Жыл бұрын

The Omega is also wearable whereas the Rolex is a dinner plate.

The Rolex Deepsea Challenge has so much writing on the dial, it looks like the backside of a Speedmaster Professional 🤣

@wristroll_vlad

Жыл бұрын

They should instead start putting the date you were added to the waitlist… for certain models this might be a fun (and more impressive) fact than some stupid shit about divers attaching watches to submarines

@juicedupjunkie2324

Жыл бұрын

Original gas escape valve?

@TheAbysswalker

Жыл бұрын

@@juicedupjunkie2324 That's part of it. But just to summarise: ORIGINAL GAS ESCAPE VALVE 👑 ROLEX OYSTER PERPETUAL DEEPSEA CHALLENGE SEA-DWELLER 36090ft = 11000m SUPERLATIVE CHRONOMETER OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED SWISS MADE RING LOCK SYSTEM It's personal preference, of course, but to me it's just not pleasing to have so much writing on the dial. I prefer a clean look.

@kevinbarnbrook4728

Жыл бұрын

Or just a backside?

@bobotmeister

11 ай бұрын

@@wristroll_vlad good one 😆

Every Rolex watch should have the words 'challenge to get' on tbe dial, the way things are going 😂

@almac9203

Жыл бұрын

The challenge is getting to the top of the wait list!

@elrockerchido

Жыл бұрын

sickest Burn ive read so far! Kudos mate

The deepest scuba dive is around 330 meters, so the depth arms race is a bit daft really. I guess if you accidentally drop your watch overboard on your yacht, and mount a multi million dollar recovery operation, from the sea floor 1000s of meters below, it'll still work. So that's good.

@scurvyseapups

Жыл бұрын

😆😆😆

@TripleDDDD

Жыл бұрын

As well every diver uses dive computers, way more features like depth gauge, decompression levels, fast ascend warning etc. Some use a watch as a backup. And there i prefer a Gshock or a Casio Duro.

@LanguagesWithAndrew

Жыл бұрын

I really dislike dive watches with any more than 300m of water resistance because every additional meter of WR means additional weight and thickness THAT I NEITHER NEED NOR WANT. I was so disappointed wiht Omega's new 6000m line - some of the color combinations are gorgeous but the weight and thickness due to the ridiculous WR rating they have just absolutely ruins them.

@almac9203

Жыл бұрын

@@LanguagesWithAndrew the Omega Ultra Deep is only slightly thicker than the Rolex Deep-sea but goes way deeper. The thickness is very reasonable given the insane WR. The Rolex Challenge has crossed the line into ridiculous.

@hochspannunglebensgefahr5339

Жыл бұрын

That not the point.

I just bought an Omega Seamaster 300m Diver Chronograph last month. It's super chunky at 17.5 mm thick but I have to say I would never ever ever get a watch thicker than that

@dendee

Жыл бұрын

Whuch one you got yourself ? I have the white dial and love it

@billiondollardan

Жыл бұрын

@@dendee black dial and yellow accents regatta

@almac9203

Жыл бұрын

The Ultra Deep is only slightly thicker at 18.1mm and is good for 6000m.

@deepseadweller687

Жыл бұрын

I'm happy with my Planet Ocean 600 and Deepsea James Cameron 126660. That enough.

@alexyu6928

8 ай бұрын

I have been wearing my Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph for 23 years (before Co-axial time) and the watch had gone diving in Hawaii, swimming pool, hot tub, sauna and steam room in the gym. The most depth it had dived down to was about 50 feet and that was all I could take. These super deep dive watches are for people who appreciate a fine piece of craftsmanship and not particularly for everyday wearing. The Rolex is a very pretty watch and Omega is a watch you can actually buy any time without a ridiculously long waiting list as the Rolex, and Rolex price their watch out of reach for most people me included. By the way my 23 years old Omega had it first service two years ago and it is now running at about 1 and a half second fast per month, yes month not day. My Rolex Datejust two tone runs about 5 seconds fast per day. Not locking Rolex it is just my situation.

Rolex taking fight to the shops: “Sorry, it’s for display purposes only 😂🙃

As someone who literally just made the decision between the Planet Ocean and the DeepSea Dweller... The PO wins hands down.

@DebmalyaSinha

Жыл бұрын

please tell me you got the Ti one? its gorgeous and something people might actually wanna wear.

@Dasani31

Жыл бұрын

I have a PO gmt too. Great watch. And I enjoy the open caseback

@alfieakaronaldog

Жыл бұрын

The PO doesn’t win, but it is a fantastic watch (in Blue 😎).

@alfieakaronaldog

Жыл бұрын

@@Dasani31 It’s just a three hand and Chronograph these days isn’t it? GMT Dive watch sounds niche.

@DampRaccoon

Жыл бұрын

@@DebmalyaSinha what a ridiculous comment 😂

And Sinn have made a watch that'll go just as deep and, crucially, is wearable! Also doesn't cost stupid amounts.

@michaelriera6277

Жыл бұрын

This is simply incorrect. Nice try,

@michaeleccles3336

Жыл бұрын

@@danbarrett3347 it is water resistant to as deep as it is possible to go on this earth - so it'll go 'just as deep'. The fact it's quartz is irrelevant (but I actually think divers watches are better being quartz) and obviously the use of oil is the reason it's wearable.

@michaeleccles3336

Жыл бұрын

@@danbarrett3347 didn't need to go to the website, I already knew all of that information having previously owned the watch in question. Thank you for pointing out the bleeding obvious though. Its amazing how irate people can get about something like this. My original message simply said that Sinn made a watch that could go as deep and was actually wearable and much cheaper. All of those things are correct. If you don't like quartz, don't think it's a like for like comparison etc etc, that's another argument entirely. Who are you anyway the 'Rolega' marketing minister for idiotic watches?

@michaeleccles3336

Жыл бұрын

@@danbarrett3347 oh dear.... I started this with "that is simply incorrect"? Might want to check who's name is next to that comment Dim... I mean Dan. The water resistance is how many metres? The deepest part of the ocean is how deep? I'm sorry, I don't see the contradiction 🤔 I do, however, see that you concede it can go as deep in a later paragraph after claiming it can't. Finally, and I didn't realise I was talking to an eleven year old ('haters'? Really?) I'm pretty sure that a subjective opinion is still allowed in these times. I'll qualify that opinion by saying that yes, I think a watch that is made for the wrist and measures 28mm deep is idiotic. Rolex and omega are only doing this for one up man ship over the other. Its marketing bragging rights by the two largest and largely most boring watch makers in Switzerland. They've done it so the accountant with the seamaster can justify his purchase over the accountant with the sub in they pub on a Friday night. ".... Yes, but omega hold the record for deepest dive..." Neither of whom have subjected their watches to anything deeper than the bath. Making a watch that functions at eleven thousand metres under the sea is idiotic. (in my opinion) The sinn is completely different - I agree with you here - as it is made to be as hard as nails. This watch will outlive you in any of your adventures. It's built to be tough as old boots and actually used. It is a functioning tool watch and not a marketing wet dream. I don't know who the chap was referring to when he said 'that is simply incorrect' but he was incorrect. You were correct in what you said and so was I. Can the Sinn go to the deepest part of our ocean without letting water in? Yes. Is it affordable? It's not cheap but it's much much much more affordable and attainable that the rolex or omega. Is it wearable? It's big but it's not crazy big.

The new Rolex has a HE valve while the Omega that went to the bottom did not, doesnt that say something about the difference in build quality - that the Rolex was not built so as to prevent gasses from penetrating the case like the Omega was. Same with the Omega 2000m Ultra Deep vs like a Rolex Sea Dweller...

So both watches have a feature that 100% of their owners will never use.

As a diver i find it quite funny with these dive watches. Since most divers nowadays use dive computers. Way more features like depth gauge and decompression levels. And 90% of (non tech) divers never reach deeper than 40 meters. Off course I like dive watches and have a Seiko Diver. Never used it for diving though.

@leomarsic289

Жыл бұрын

it's true, we're all crazy, I have sd34 and jc deepsea, and for diving I use seiko mm300

A minute repeater .... No one in rolex can think about a minute repeater ..

@bloodymarvelous4790

Жыл бұрын

Because it's the most annoying complication in the history of wrist watches. Who wants to hear the incessant dings from a watch because the asshole wearing it would rather count the chimes than look at the dial to see what time it is?

@diavalus

Жыл бұрын

They got stuck at cyclops, jubilee bracelets and superlative.

@GeneraLigma

Жыл бұрын

Whoaaa easy there...that would involve actual innovation...Instead, here: have this dinner plate of a watch with a lower depth rating than the one we already made in the 1960's lol.

@ES-tr5no

Жыл бұрын

They would have to find someone to make it for them first and then they would claim to be the inventor of that type of watch.

This Rolex is the Halloween version of the divers: the size, 50 x 23 makes it suitable for Pro bodybuilders ONLY. I was not happy about Omega Ultra deep's size and price, nor James Cameron's version weight on wrist, but those models are now in comparences so attractive and must haves. Panerai and Hubblet are now officially challenged by Rolex, not Omega imho!

@aboner2551

Жыл бұрын

Flavor Flav would wear it round his neck.

I honestly love this Podcast, if you can call this, nowadays i am to busy to keep up to all the watch stuff. But i watch every episode of this show. its entertaining and keeps me kinda up to date and still shows me more and new watch brands. Keep it up.

Interessting to see that Rolex really released a 50mm wide and 25mm thick unwearable behemoth just to beat Omega for the depth rating😅 At least Omegas Ultradeep is wearable and at a reasonable price🙃

@almac9203

Жыл бұрын

Any regular brute can wear the Ultra Deep whereas you would have to be Shaq to wear the ridiculous Rolex. That Rolex is crazy.

@joelburke289

Жыл бұрын

They’re really not to be thought of as regular watches.. more like showpieces of the tech. Historically too, the challenge is the production model of the 2012 unit, coaxed on by JCameron himself to compete against Omega.

@almac9203

Жыл бұрын

@@joelburke289 Omega could also produce an unwearble 11000m beast. The problem is it wouldn't be a watch but a trophy. Rolex should have produced something to beat Omega but kept it wearable. 50mm by 23.5mm is crazy. I would have to strap that to my leg!

“Pull your socks up!” - lol

Whilst I’m typically more of a Rolex fan than Omega, for me the Ultra Deep wins here. More interesting & colourful dial. The inner ring ‘..gas escape valve…’ on the Rolex serves only to shrink its main dial imho. Plus, the watch is twice the price of the Omega. Both pieces are too thick & big to wear (for 99% of us) anyway. Technically impressive but everyday useless. This is just the two brands playing tit-for-tat at a game no one plays ;-)

@bloodymarvelous4790

Жыл бұрын

The dial size is the same as every other Rolex dive watch. It's not shrunk, it's just not sized up. The inner ring serves to prevent the watch from buckling under the extreme pressure at 11,000 meters due to the pressure difference between the air in the watch (1 bar) and the water outside (1,101 bar).

@KeepingWatchUK

Жыл бұрын

@@bloodymarvelous4790 At 2000m down (circa 200 atmospheres) the pressure would be so great a human diver would be crushed anyway. So the extra 9000m is pointless. Thus, that ugly inner ring, which gives impression of a shrunken dial, is simply useless for any real purpose. As I say, technically impressive but for everyday use out & about the watch is simply too big, too thick & too ugly. Will no doubt be a hit for collectors/investors/flippers but I personally buy to wear all my Rolex and so prefer them to sit modestly on wrist & look nice! Just my opinion 👍🏻

@KeepingWatchUK

Жыл бұрын

@Jay M our local swimming pool must be lower down on the list re council upgrade to such depths. We have to settle for a few meters, sadly. Even my 300m diver panics as I relax on the side 😆

@KeepingWatchUK

Жыл бұрын

@128-192 And you lost yours by liking your own comment 😂

@RickyRicon2023

Жыл бұрын

wo wo wo ... Planet O ultra deep 45.5mm and 16or18mm thick right... it is big and thick but it is possible to wear... the challenge with 50mm and 23mm it is a old soviet's tank haha

I agree with Fed. If it ever gets deep enough to need that rating I’m not going in to get it back! 😂

I will probably get ‘The Call’ for the Challenge announced yesterday, before the UltraDeep(Sea) that was announced early March 😂

Meanwhile I'm over in the corner eating paste with my Tudor Pelagos

Not as deep in capabilities as Omega but as good as that Sea-Dweller, I'm quite a fan of how nice the Bell & Ross Hydromax 11000m is to wear. Sadly doesn't seem to get much credit amongst deep sea divers.

Ah. The Invicta homage.

The opening line regarding how deep has someone gone is funny because I always wonder why we spend so much on deep divers watches (myself included). I’ve never dived. But even those who have likely don’t go frequently enough to justify a 6,000M divers watch. So we buy them basically because they look cool and in the event we go in water that’s deeper than a swimming pool.

So the Rolex deep sea challenge watch didn't actually go to the depth they have rated it to? Omega ultra deep watch went deeper? If this is the case, are we saying that Rolex has released a higher depth rating you can buy? that is a strange move by Rolex but interesting.

@notsafefortorque9060

Жыл бұрын

you can't buy*

@chriszivoder2650

Жыл бұрын

@@notsafefortorque9060 oh yea that's right, well in theory lol

The 2022 Rolex Deepsea Challenge would be the first production Rolex in Titanium, right?

@stiggeltime9182

Жыл бұрын

Correct

@Atombender

Жыл бұрын

@@stiggeltime9182 That makes it even more desirable. And no one's gonna wear it, considering its size (50x23mm).

@kuongsam2314

Жыл бұрын

Made up of unobtainium.

Great video guys!

So Omega has gone to the moon and to the bottom of the ocean? Hehe Rolex must be kicking themselves...

@ES-tr5no

Жыл бұрын

Get ready, Omega is ready to go to Mars too.

@jcmuscle123

Жыл бұрын

But is harder to actually find a Rolex for sell on the ad than actually going to the moon

@stevewalters6003

Жыл бұрын

Bulova also went to the moon.

@joelburke289

Жыл бұрын

Rolex went to the bottom both on 60s & 2012, short maybe by 10-20 m. Difference is insignificant, plus Challenge rated for 15,000m. Rolex hardly kicking themselves. Omega only wishes they had Rolex brand mystique and cache.

@ES-tr5no

Жыл бұрын

@@joelburke289 rolex has never actually gone all the way and touch the very bottom of the trench. You know, touch the sand that’s down there.

Loved this video! As an owner, I'm a huge fan of the James Cameron Deep Sea. This new watch not so much. I would never be able to wear it so I see no reason in owning it. Plus, there is no chance of me obtaining it so it doesn't really matter. I do appreciate it for what it is though.

Watch makers are obsessed with depth which is mental considering it’s owners don’t take the watch any deeper than a hot tub

Why don’t they just put one on the end of a piece of string and drop it off the side of the boat until it hits the bottom. Surely cheaper than going down in a sub

@ES-tr5no

Жыл бұрын

The Omega Ultra Deep did hit the bottom.

All hail Invicta! 😅🤣🙃 (Rolex is after you)

Interesting to make a watch with a depth rating you can only test by strapping it to the outside of your submarine. Not much use for a wristwatch of any brand if only sub can wear it.

It would be interesting if someone made a watch that could go down to the Marianna Trench and space, kind of mastering pressure at both extreme ends. Omega perhaps - Speed-seamaster moonwatch ultra deep?

"...job a Hoodinkee.." I died

Couldn’t they just dangle one on a piece of string till it hit the bottom?

@ES-tr5no

Жыл бұрын

The Omega did hit the bottom. Set there for a day before they could retrieve it and it was still keeping correct time. So, how can you go deeper?

I can't stand watch manufacturers simply dumping in the same small dial of a standard model like Planet Ocean or Deepsea into a much larger case with an ultra broad bezel but tiny dial and crystal. Don't they look lopsided and odd? They should have fitted a bigger dial and crystal with the matching proportions than to cut costs from making a new dial. You mean you are ok with the non-proportionate dimensions of case, bezel and dial?

When are you guys going to review the most popular Rolex currently in AD’s? It’s something called an “Exhibition Only” 🤔

the rolex is more jewelry while the omega is more of a tool watch, imo, especially in titanium. car people would call it a "sleeper".

Idk what’s happening this year but there are alot of interesting and new watches getting released i hope i can one day start my own collection

@GGOWO

Жыл бұрын

😊

Lol, just wear a hockey puck.

I want one with a jubilee band and in platinum so it's way heavier!!

@vincent67239

Жыл бұрын

YES

I'm glad these watches exist because i'm always swimming around the bottom of the mariana's trench.

Did you know, your 300m watch and 11000m water resistant watches have about the same odds in keeping water out? Neither will ever reach depths that will reach their depth limits, however, both are just as likely that their owners forgot to screw back the crown before entering water.

What is the use of the bezel at 11,000m?

Rolex is trying to outdo Invicta

It is bloody cool though… If you’ve had a hard on for the original challenge, this is a production unit. Only thing is, the dial is boring, no date, no pretty gradient like my deepsea blue. If they include in the next round, I might be in trouble :-)

@almac9203

Жыл бұрын

You would rock a 50mm by 23.5mm watch?

@joelburke289

Жыл бұрын

@@almac9203 yes, as a showpiece, not regular watch. Even the deepsea gets weighty after a while and I have to cool it.

Thanks for making fun of these ridiculous watches and well done to Tom for pointing out just how pompous James Cameron can be. I hope the chief got a good price 😂

Do you plan to cover the c1 bel canto ?

I’m going to bear this in mind for my next trip to the bottom of the Mariana Trench

@bloodymarvelous4790

Жыл бұрын

This watch comes with an 11 kilometer piece of string, and a boat ticket to the Mariana Trench so you can test it out. If the watch fails, Rolex guarantees they'll replace it for free, complete with a new boat ticket. You will need to reuse the string though.

Cameron... I get it. The "earning it part", then he lost me with the slapping on the indigenous chief part. That REALLY was HOODINKEE LEVEL EXTRA!

What would be interesting now is to see them taking the actual production watch out there, not a proto.

That price is so typical for Rolex, it is way too much for a titanium watch and yet it "works" in Rolex logic as it is their first production titanium watch. Yes I know the yacht master, but that was not a real production series.

There is something of the "not quite" about Rolex isn't there. Not quite the first to the bottom of the ocean. Not quite the first to the top of Everest. I don't think they quite had the first GMT (Glycine Airman). I don't think they quite had the first dive watch (fifty fathoms). Just a thought.

Yeah but the Planet Ocean 6000 is 45mm vs the 50mm if the new Rolex. Also is 18.1mm thick vs the 23mm of the Rolex. It's kinda wearable..

I honestly get the feeling that Rolex has run out of ideas. First, a left-handed watch nobody asked for, and now this. As a technical exercise, it's fascinating. However... its size makes it impractical to wear, and being the first production Rolex in titanium (hell, just being a Rolex in general) it's going to be next to impossible to get at retail. Plus, at this stage, it's claiming a mantle that it hasn't even achieved yet - at least the Omega Ultra Deep can actually claim to have been to the bottom of the ocean. It's also ugly to boot (or should that be, Das Boot?)

The fact this is even a competition for a watch that that will never be worn that deep by any human, is absolutely pointless.

In order to be able to purchase this watch, you need to present your SCUBA certification. Or, at least, I'd like it that were the case so it doesn't end up in a safe somewhere, never to ever come in contact with ocean water.

@aaddy5157

Жыл бұрын

I'm a PADI open water scuba diver. I'm licenced to dive down to a maximum of 18 meters below sea level.

@Goodbutevilgenius

Жыл бұрын

​@@aaddy5157 you're almost there, just 11 more kilometers

I wonder how Rolex manages to keep the gasses out of the case at such depths...

Would love Invicta to bring out a 70mm watch to put this contest to bed.

In this era of high technology and not to mention diving computers, Rolex is looking a bit silly. I suspect they are trying to keep people buying their stainless steel subs that realistically are only worth worth 3K. If they had precious metal cases then that would be a different matter.

Rolex and Invicta collab finally!

Wow my 50 meter watch still works after swimming

This is a brill video. Watchfinder creating some brilliant content.

Joe Biden was asked about this as he is a Rolex owner, he replied… “ I have two words to describe this watch- way too big!”

They do but only if you give the AD manager a large brown envalope

The difference between Rolex and omega: Omega holds the world record for deepest dive watch in the world and makes a wearable production model that looks really cool and has new materials in it. Rolex makes a production model of their deepest dive watch which looks ridiculous and can’t be worn 😂 however because it is in production, people think it’s the deepest watch… they just want people to think they hold those records when in reality they don’t

@bobotmeister

11 ай бұрын

its a novelty really... the thing is getting one even if you have the money.😅

I live in Switzerland, been to Rolex dealers in Basel, Zurich and Lucerne. Have never seen a submariner in person, is this brand real?

I had to laugh at James Cameron saying he gave his watch away to an indigenous tribe leader. How is that leader going to get it serviced? Could they afford to have it serviced, even if they were able to? A gesture of pure symbology, little practical value, lol.

At this rate, I'm sure there's a market for a future Omega Coremaster 1500 Kelvin

Felt a bit like it was an ad for the starfish watch (aka Rolex) - until the very end. Burn indeed.

Pretty sure they made it to the bottom but the place they landed just wasn’t the deepest part of the trench, I could be wrong but I think that’s right isn’t it?

It's been decided that Sylvester Stallone will be wearing that in Rambo XVI down to the Mariana Trench directed by James Cameron

Wow, my sarcasm-o-meter almost broke!

What will dealers refer to this one as? The Unit? The Chonk?

7:21 Is this the return of bevelled lugs to the oyster case?

Well done, mates. You handle the absurdity of it all with wit.

5:43 no way Cameron dropped that cheesy ass line lmao, what does that even mean "to earn a Submariner"??

@Goodbutevilgenius

Жыл бұрын

Means you and your party must slay at least twice your number of Omega ADs before you are allowed to have one.

My friend got a sea dweller as a gift and it is a massive chunker of a watch, he doesn't even like wearing it because of the size and weight

I want to see a deep sea version repped by Captain Quint!! Arrrggg!

My wife was reading over my information about my sub and said wow they tested your watch’s waterproofing to that depth. If your watch is 10ft below the water surface it fell off your wrist.

I might have seen that Cameron's Submariner selling on E-Bay.

It’s the kind of watch that if u drown into the abyss, the rescue team will find a compressed decompose body but they still can retrieve a perfectly working Rolex 👍🏻

.... damn , I need one rated at 11,005M .... just have to wait for the next version ............

the original was rated to 12000m and had a date, this one is only 11 and no date... what gives Rolex?

Who thinks that the Ultra Deep 75th will be a futur collectible. I own a JC, yet it’s tempting to collect the Summer Blue too. Isn’t the “Omega was there” a very cool 😎 thing ? Otherwise, should I go all the way to PloProf ?

the submarine to go down is cheaper plus you probably can get one

The Challenge has no use: it is purely academic. No diver would survive such ambient pressure.

I work in Dialysis. There is water and other liquids everywhere. My Omega 9900 never lets me down.

Wait, wait, the rolex almost made it to the bottom of the trench and didn’t the Omega set on the floor of the trench after it fell off the arm of the sub and it set there for a day until they were able to find it? Can’t get any deeper than sitting on the very bottom of the trench. So how can they beat Omega when Omega has already been there.

@jesstotten5571

Жыл бұрын

I don't think the Omega actually fell off, the expedition it was a part of carefully mapped the bottom of the trench and they went into the deepest part of it, something that neither Trieste nor Cameron's trip felt a need to do. The hosts have it right that if Rolex wants the title back they will probably have to go back with shovels and a bucket. I'm sure they can come up with some halfway plausible justification involving science, but time will tell.

@ES-tr5no

Жыл бұрын

@@jesstotten5571 an arm on the sub had to be detach and the Omega set there for 24 hours before they could back and retrieve it, but the Omega did touch the bottom. View the link. kzread.info/dash/bejne/qIN8xbqDiJvdedo.html

@garyboyle695

Жыл бұрын

Just Rolex doing what Rolex do best, claiming firsts that they never actually achieved.

Unfortunately the only Rolex AD currently taking orders on the Deepsea Challenge is located in The Lost City of Atlantis.

This is all very wonderful but.... The deepest a human has ever dived is 332.35m (1,090ft). The difference between the Rolex and Omega is with Omega you won't have to go on a 3 year waiting list to get one.

@almac9203

Жыл бұрын

The Omega is also a wearable size whereas this is a dinner plate.

@vincent67239

Жыл бұрын

Actually,

Excellent podcast guys, pity you can't buy a Rolex unlike the Omega's. Think you should have mentioned that in the chat. Great content and banter as always, can't wait for part 2. 👍⌚🤣

@alfieakaronaldog

Жыл бұрын

Do you know anyone who has managed to buy that Omega then?

WHAT IS THE POINT! A lot of figures that no one will use or even need, and a an unwearable case. Who would buy this, and if so, why

That's adorable video, would you please compare both to the gigantic Extreme Blancpain Fifty Fathoms X Fathoms?

Taken the fight to Omega in the shops!!!! If you could get a Rolex in a shop!