The media will not go near this.....Rational thought.

@Charles-nt5bt

5 ай бұрын

Malcolm x spoke about this kind how much did he paid or getting paid

@r.walker7986

4 ай бұрын

Its bnot brational, its what byoun want to hear... "A 2019 study by Princeton University political scientists disputed the findings by Fryer, saying that if police had a higher threshold for stopping whites, this might mean that the whites, Hispanics and blacks in Fryer's data are not similar.[24] Nobel-laureate James Heckman and Steven Durlauf, both University of Chicago economists, published a response to the Fryer study, writing that the paper "does not establish credible evidence on the presence or absence of discrimination against African Americans in police shootings" due to issues with selection bias" Depending on what data you choose to analyze, you can get whatever outcome you want...

@onba7726

4 ай бұрын

Well, they did but by propping up sexual abuse allegations. Ones that were never reported to police, only to the collage.

@r.walker7986

4 ай бұрын

@@onba7726 They were not abuse allegations they were not the kind of allegations that the police could do anything about, they were inappropriate behavior claims he basically admitted to and tried to chalk up just joking or innocent but it was exactly what it was reported as.

@onba7726

4 ай бұрын

@@r.walker7986 And how do you they were all true? Were you there? The articles I read all made it sound like abuse, so he was smeared. I did know he admitted to some of it in the form of jokes but not all the allegations. Now-a-days 'inappropriate conduct' is tamer then the s* us high school girls used to say to each other as jokes anyway. Plus, the investigation was apparently conducted by the fraudster Claudine Gay and she's know to persecute her political enemies. Regardless of how true the might be it's got nothing to do with the validity of his research.

I admire his honesty. Thank you.

@Charles-nt5bt

4 ай бұрын

He did not do a thorough research so everybody got an opinion just white guilt

@bigantho1557

2 ай бұрын

It’s crazy how people can not accept truth. Cause they are so damn hateful and love hating.

@clrussell3962

10 күн бұрын

​@@Charles-nt5btso the Black Harvard Professor didn't know what he was doing to do a "thorough" research paper?

Showing this in my college comp class today since we are discussing research ethics and confirmation bias. Thanks all!!

@VioletJoy

4 ай бұрын

👏 👏 👏

@prior_floridaman4870

4 ай бұрын

How’d it go?

@drunkenrage8996

4 ай бұрын

​@@prior_floridaman4870 probably bad

@joshpisawesome

4 ай бұрын

hero

@r.walker7986

4 ай бұрын

i hope you showed the criticisms of his research and why people have an issue with it as well..."A 2019 study by Princeton University political scientists disputed the findings by Fryer, saying that if police had a higher threshold for stopping whites, this might mean that the whites, Hispanics and blacks in Fryer's data are not similar.[24] Nobel-laureate James Heckman and Steven Durlauf, both University of Chicago economists, published a response to the Fryer study, writing that the paper "does not establish credible evidence on the presence or absence of discrimination against African Americans in police shootings" due to issues with selection bias"

Claudine Gay should have researched her own data before just fanning the flames.

It takes strong minds to conduct proper research. Well done

This needs to go viral ... spread it around cause media has already suppressed this for 8 fricken years. He redid the research twice ... twice with same results !

@pauljensen4773

4 ай бұрын

He did it twice. He redid it once.

thank you Bari! Thank you Roland!!

Good for him!! Honest ♥️🇺🇸!! Thank you for your hard thought provoking words and work!!

Imagine being upset because the results of a study were not as negative as you thought they'd be! Insanity!!!

@jimstephens9900

5 ай бұрын

With artificial intelligience Harvard academic types will be novelties

@Nick-cz7nv

4 ай бұрын

It's called liberalism

@r.walker7986

4 ай бұрын

"A 2019 study by Princeton University political scientists disputed the findings by Fryer, saying that if police had a higher threshold for stopping whites, this might mean that the whites, Hispanics and blacks in Fryer's data are not similar.[24] Nobel-laureate James Heckman and Steven Durlauf, both University of Chicago economists, published a response to the Fryer study, writing that the paper "does not establish credible evidence on the presence or absence of discrimination against African Americans in police shootings" due to issues with selection bias"

@kwizzledizzle4513

3 ай бұрын

Did they have evidence to show police had a higher treshold for stopping whites? And in what way did selection bias play a part? Not even saying one is correct and the others aren't, cause I was wondering about a possible 'treshold' for even having interactions with police myself. I do think that those later studies had a specific motive to seek for another outcome, where I don't feel the first was trying to dispell racial bias as a goal..

@bigantho1557

2 ай бұрын

@@r.walker7986Fryer was right. Its all good though. Not the end of the world.

This should have 100 million views

I don't know what I love more about Roland: His commitment to data and the truth, no matter where it leads. His compassion for those living in poverty and fear. Or his sense of humor. He is just such an amazing and wonderful man.🥰

@user-cs4su3ng9l

4 ай бұрын

Definitely the first one for me

This is one of the best presentations I have ever heard. Thank you fine folks!

Thank God theres people that still tell the truth I've pulled and thrown when I was doing something wrong and when I didn't do anything I was honest with them I didn't attack them I even apologized when I saw them at the grocery store in their civies and called them when i need them and during a neighborhood burglar without there is no civility but cause thank you brother for standing for truth and not being apart of the collective blessings favor and peace to you and your family

@Charles-nt5bt

5 ай бұрын

You don't know the truth from a lie

@r.walker7986

4 ай бұрын

the "truth" can bbe manipulated to spell out whatever you want, go read the criticisms of his research....

Incredible courageous man! Real Truth seeker. Good sense of humor also helps! I am in love with his beautiful mind!

When I was young I hung out in a predominately black group, I had one white friend in that group, I used to get stopped regularly, with the group or just walking down the street, my White friend only experienced stop and searches when he was with us, he never got stopped. One time we were stopped in my white friend's car, just me him and an Asian friend of ours, A female Police officer asked if I had been in trouble before I said no and she chuckled and asked if I was sure, I assured her I hadn't but she laughed and said I was lying threatening to check so I told her to go check, a minute or so later she came back looking sheepish and said "it seems you were right". Now being stopped by Police often is not violence, I'm not being shot but it betrays a mindset that many people have and some of those people happen to be Police officers, this happened In London by the way and when I reached 20, it seemed I became invisible to the Police and was never stopped again, I'm in my 50s now. I'm not saying this to contradict his findings just that this is my lived experience of dealing with Police, I watched a documentary that came out in. the early 90s, and after I watched it I concluded that the Police as a group don't like anybody white, black, rich or poor, it seems that they almost look for excuses to show their distaste for the people they have sworn to serve

Wished that you would also include Roland's comments on truth telling the 35 minute mark. It was interesting to see the police accepted the study findings & want to reform on lower levels of force usage.

Thank you

Claudine Gay suspended him. Trashed his reputation.

@Charles-nt5bt

5 ай бұрын

Good

@TimmyTOnTheFly

4 ай бұрын

Claudine Gay isn’t on his intellectual level and she’s a race baiter. That’s why she did that but Roland Fryer will continue to prove everybody wrong 🤷🏽‍♂️🤡💯

@TimmyTOnTheFly

4 ай бұрын

@@Charles-nt5bt @coleenzisa950 y’all some race baiters too. Roland is speaking facts but y’all hate him cause it don’t fit y’all narrative. Y’all are 🤡

@TimmyTOnTheFly

4 ай бұрын

@@Charles-nt5bt you mad cause his studies don’t align with your narrative. Straight 🤡🤦🏽‍♂️

@peterbuild389

4 ай бұрын

you must be miserable ​@@Charles-nt5bt

Incredibly sad.

Only 16,000 views...How is that possible?!

This is insane.

Good for this man speaking the truth.

@Charles-nt5bt

5 ай бұрын

He's speaking of damn lie he don't speak speak for colored floks

There’s absolutely bias in policing.

@hellodarkness5644

3 ай бұрын

Think you might be too stupid to understand this, move along.

Is it possible that the low level uses of force discrepancy you found; be more about behavior and less about race? Perhaps certain demographics are generally more difficult to deal with so they test a persons patience more? Is it possible that could be the factor and not racism, because you implied that it’s racism. I’m asking if maybe there is a different reason why a certain demographic gets treated differently, other than the color of their skin? Is it possible that there is a cultural component that is leading to rougher treatment?

@VioletJoy

4 ай бұрын

That is totally the case. I've seen his research as well as that of Heather Mac Donald. Super interesting.

@ToxicGamer86454

4 ай бұрын

@@VioletJoy What is “totally the case”

@cheeseburgereddie1929

3 ай бұрын

That’s a good question to ask but although I haven’t read his report, I have to assume that to come to his conclusions, he and his team had to factor in unprovoked low level uses of force on both demographics as well as provoked low level uses of force on both demographics, in order to identify a disproportionality. Otherwise, he wouldn’t be able to come to any conclusion of biases.

@ToxicGamer86454

3 ай бұрын

@@cheeseburgereddie1929 You don’t think that people can reach conclusions based on assumptions? Or that they can simply misinterpret the data or that the data itself can be flawed? Based on my own experience and observations it isn’t about race. At least that race doesn’t play near as big of a role as the cultural component. I’m not saying that assumptions aren’t made based on race, but that doesn’t necessarily make the person racist. If I see a group of young blacks dressed in typical ghetto garb and being loud and obnoxious it isn’t racist for me to fear them more than the old white lady out with her walker. 10% of the population commits half of all violent crimes and murders. They commit crimes at several times the rate of whites. To not consider those statistics diluting an encounter is simply reckless. Especially when signs of that violent culture become apparent at the onset or during the interaction. Even among criminals there is a huge difference between the races. I’ve been to prison twice and to the county jail a dozen times. I can say with certainty that black criminals are much more likely to be violent than white criminals. You have to consider that statistical fact when encountering them. To not consider it is foolishness.

Please post the link to the study. Is it blue label and pier reviewed?

There have been articles written about the supposed flaws in his research. The explanations of these "flaws" are so obviously biased. There are key signs to look for when reviewing data or reading an article. The rebuttals show every red flag.

No racial bias yet black people are more likely to have a negative interaction with police?

Self censorship😞

Shootings based off of what you do know you can skew statistics

Only 19k views huh?!?! Interesting...

Huh...you mean there was a narrative that didn't fit all along...go figure. It's just sad that it took an esteemed college professor to crunch the data, put pen to paper, and then get persuaded in the other direction by his peers for something anyone with a high school diploma and a little common sense could have told you all along.

Never trust anyone who uses the guise of "science" these days. It's the new religion. This guy is doing actual science, truth seeking.

2024 and folks still can't handle the TRUTH!!! John 3:19-20, 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed.

Thomas Sowell in the making?

@Harlem1mentality

5 ай бұрын

No Roland Fryer why compare him

@softballbryan

5 ай бұрын

God I don’t know why…. Black… economist…. Studied findings over feelings….

@VioletJoy

4 ай бұрын

I admire Thomas Sowell so much. They both speak facts and data, both things that are sorely lacking in today's society.

Фраер не сдал назад.

phew..brutal

I saw him earlier

Good man and good call on diapers lol

@Charles-nt5bt

5 ай бұрын

Well Malcolm x spoke about about these kinda people 😮

He talks for 3 minutes and I still don't know about what fact is he talking about?

Only 95 comments lol, of course doesnt fit the narrative.

“There is no more lucrative business than fighting for rights that you already have, in the name of oppressions that do not exist, with the money of those who they describe as oppressors”. Thomas Sowell

How many cops are going to say they shot someone because they are black 😂

@SeanShuffler

5 ай бұрын

The same amount of cops that say they pushed up on someone because they’re black…make sense?

@ohiunku

5 ай бұрын

That’s not how this works, what a stupid response. I hope you are joking but you can never be sure. A lot of idiots out there 😂😂

@wowzabooza4026

5 ай бұрын

Read the paper and how the study was conducted, fool.

@esposexy2210

5 ай бұрын

What? How do you think studies like this work?

@jamessmith785

5 ай бұрын

That's not how these studies work. It's all about the numbers not individual testimony of shooters you dunce LOL

So he wrote a paper using data the police departments SELECTED to give him and is surprised academics find this irresponsible?

@BrandyBrandalia

4 ай бұрын

Thats not what happened

@samuelcarrasco3829

4 ай бұрын

@@BrandyBrandalia it is… the data is from 10 jurisdictions in 3 states in the first data set, and Houston in the second data set. There was selection bias as the data he had was data that was willingly given to them.

@VioletJoy

4 ай бұрын

Police have to report everything that happens in each case. Even if we followed the 80/20 rule, that would mean that 80% of the data was accurate. Of course, it's much higher than that. Police departments have to report every death that occurs in these instances. It's not like injuries and deaths can be slipped under the rug. If you look at the cases that have gone viral, there are really only a few. Considering the mass numbers of police interactions with the public, those are a tiny minority.

@samuelcarrasco3829

4 ай бұрын

@@VioletJoy You are saying random things as if the 80/20 was even remotely scientific. If you don't get it yet let me give you a comparison. This data is about as useful as when a police department does a "thorough internal investigation" on themselves whenever they do something wrong. You get it yet?

@takumifujiwara9181

3 ай бұрын

@@samuelcarrasco3829 honestly ppl like you are disgusting you're looking for a narrative and not a conversation. If you really believe what you're saying then that means this guy is a liar so why don't you go ahead and expose him if you're so sure. You're free to write a paper and a study that shows he is incorrect.

it took a lot of courage to publish this