RJS - EVIDENCE ACT -2011-2021 ALL QUESTIONS of - RAJASTHAN JUDICIAL SERVICES

In this video, We have provided you, with all the questions and their answers INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT - which came in the PRE exam papers of Rajasthan Judicial Services from 2011 -2021, FULLY discussed with Provisions.
This will be helpful for you in the Upcoming exam of RJS 2024.
I hope you will like this video.
If the video is not clear, please play it in HD.
#rjs
#rajasthan
#rajasthanjudiciarypre2024
#rjspre2024
#rjspre
#rajasthanjudicialservices
#law&gk
Twitter - / lawandgk
Facebook - Law & GK
Telegram - @lawandgk t.me/lawandgk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: The answer key discussed is only suggestive. We take due care and attention (Good Faith Section 52 IPC) while suggesting the Answers. However, you are also advised to refer to the provisions of the law.

Пікірлер: 29

  • @kaynatdayer1569
    @kaynatdayer15692 ай бұрын

    Thank you so much .... Your efforts valueable to us .🙏🥰

  • @mamtakaushik2752
    @mamtakaushik275215 күн бұрын

    Please provide mains question subject wise

  • @srishtijain1105
    @srishtijain11052 ай бұрын

    Extremely helpful, Sir

  • @jayatishrivastava854
    @jayatishrivastava854Ай бұрын

    THANKUUU SIR ❤

  • @ChandarMohan-gl9oq
    @ChandarMohan-gl9oq2 ай бұрын

    Pls pls all subjects k Pyq daal dena ek bar subjects wise ❤

  • @sonalyadav28
    @sonalyadav282 ай бұрын

    sir rhjs ke questions bhi include kro please

  • @youtt
    @youtt2 ай бұрын

    Sir please make vedio of Sexual harrasment of women at work place act

  • @Sheph03
    @Sheph03Ай бұрын

    15:15 answer should be 2. Refer - state of raj v. bhup Singh case.

  • @lawandgk

    @lawandgk

    Ай бұрын

    ok. thanks for informing.

  • @kaynatdayer1569
    @kaynatdayer15692 ай бұрын

    Year 2017-18 Que no. 52 Ans will be 4 coz 164 ke statement ka cross examination nhi hua h coz she died . so not admissible in evidence but corroborated and contradiction u/s 157 and 145

  • @lawandgk

    @lawandgk

    2 ай бұрын

    Pakla narain swamy v Emperor. - last statement given by victim, can be treated as DD. No need to cross 164 statement in this case. 145, 157 and 158 comes into picture when they the person is alive. Pls refer Section 33. it perfectly applies to the question.

  • @amanraj5982

    @amanraj5982

    Ай бұрын

    Although Rajasthan has considered it inadmissible ..​@@lawandgk

  • @samantrai2208
    @samantrai2208Ай бұрын

    Sir please provide subject wise video of Raj apo and Raj jlo previous year subject wise

  • @lawandgk

    @lawandgk

    Ай бұрын

    JLO k papers are already thr. APO k will do it after haryana mains.

  • @MayankSharma-rh7uw
    @MayankSharma-rh7uwАй бұрын

    Ques 47:- C is correct option, section 121 says he may be examined as witness to other matters which occurred in his presence whilst he was so acting. Plz read & check before uploading the video

  • @lawandgk

    @lawandgk

    Ай бұрын

    Kindly chk your facts and concepts. My answer is correct. It’s trick question based on concept of 121. I know what I am uploading. Sometimes mistakes can happen but not on this.

  • @MayankSharma-rh7uw

    @MayankSharma-rh7uw

    Ай бұрын

    @@lawandgk only for "his own conduct" while acting as such Judge or magistrate special order required. Read the last line it's clearly mentioned, there's no trick.

  • @lawandgk

    @lawandgk

    Ай бұрын

    @@MayankSharma-rh7uw read the question, it is clearly mentioned, during the course of trail, the judge before whom. now you are saying option 3. Where it is mentioned in the Section - " as a witness"

  • @MayankSharma-rh7uw

    @MayankSharma-rh7uw

    Ай бұрын

    Arre, brother during the "Rape trail" some person persent in court stabs another person in courtroom. So the judge becomes an eye witness. He can be called as an eye witness and no special order is required, because we are not calling him as witness for "his conduct own conduct"

  • @satyamevjayate110

    @satyamevjayate110

    Ай бұрын

    @@lawandgk answer key check kariye sir, c is the correct answer

  • @harshittaank5268
    @harshittaank52682 ай бұрын

    11:20. (3) Ni hona chaiye kya????

  • @lawandgk

    @lawandgk

    2 ай бұрын

    Na

  • @anubhavgarg3908

    @anubhavgarg3908

    Ай бұрын

    Q47 ka (3) hi hona chaie..illus (c)​ of s.121 is on similar facts @@lawandgk

  • @lawandgk

    @lawandgk

    Ай бұрын

    @@anubhavgarg3908 KINDLY READ IT CAREFULLY. It's a trick question

  • @anubhavgarg3908

    @anubhavgarg3908

    Ай бұрын

    ​@@lawandgkplease let me know the trick portion, I still think 3 is the answer. Kindly let me know if I'm missing any aspect. Illustration (c) is clear on this.

  • @lawandgk

    @lawandgk

    Ай бұрын

    @@anubhavgarg3908 now tell me - in illustration c whether it is mentioned ' as a witness". NO. Section 121 says except upon special order of the court to which is superior which means a higher court than his court. Unless his superior order him to give evidence he cannot be compelled. marking option 3 means he can be called as an Ordinary witness and can be compelled to give witness. Understand. if not your wish. you may mark it as you like.

Келесі