Rick Roderick on Nietzsche and the Death of God [full length]

This video is 4th in the 8-part series, Nietzsche and the Postmodern Condition (1991).
Lecture notes:
I. Nietzsche looks to see what type of person makes particular arguments or evaluations.
II. Greek values are noble but naive.
1. Active force prevails over reactive forces (things that stand over the human will).
2. The active type is noted for its ability to forget.
a. "Mirror historicism" involves people who wander idly through relics of the past.
b. Memory is needed in Christianity for things like the redemption story.
III. In Christian morality, reactive forces prevail over the active ones.
A. Principles stand in the way of what you want.
B. Christian achievements have always had some opposite perverse nature.
C. The denial of power eroticizes the world in a brand new way.
D. Sin is what Nietzsche thought was interesting about Christianity.
E. The weak revenged themselves on the strong.
F. In the Bible, the Devil introduces interpretation.
G. Nietzsche does not deny the power of Christianity.
H. Reactive forces endanger the species.
I. Resentment and guilt are fundamental to the substructure of Christian discourse.
IV. The spectre of nihilism:
A. The aesthetic ideal expresses a will to nothingness (in the decadent period of Christianity).
B. The problem in Christianity is not finding believers, but finding real people.
V. Nietzsche's parable of the death of God:
A. The parable talks about the drying up of a horizon of meaning and of a while form of human life.
B. The parable from "The Gay Science" ("The Madmen") claims that we are responsible for God's death.
C. How shall we comfort ourselves now?
D. What are churches if not the tombs of God?
For more information, see www.rickroderick.org
A philosophy podcast, The Partially Examined Life, held a detailed discussion of Nietzsche, which can be found here:
www.partiallyexaminedlife.com/...

Пікірлер: 108

  • @nightoftheworld
    @nightoftheworld4 жыл бұрын

    41:46 *Duke chapel blasphemy* “All of the barons of tobacco (the Washington Duke family) all buried in state, not cardinals, not saints, not martyrs-no Thomas Aquinas, no Saint Thomas Moore, but George Washington Duke and his family. The buyers and sellers of America’s first international commodity: _tobacco._ The fortune upon which that church is erected and to which it is dedicated. What is that magnificent church now but the tomb and the sepulcher of God.”

  • @MKHobson
    @MKHobson5 жыл бұрын

    In the Zero Books intro, it always drove me absolutely *batshit* that I couldn't figure out what word Roderick was using when he said "live in the [???] between worlds ..." But this version has JUST enough additional auditory fidelity that I can now conclude he's saying "interregnum." Thank you, Dead Jesus!

  • @renaissancefairyowldemon7686

    @renaissancefairyowldemon7686

    2 жыл бұрын

    I think you got title wrong the book Book Zero.....

  • @DirkKelly

    @DirkKelly

    2 жыл бұрын

    I'm here for exactly the same reason, Diet Soap / Sublation Media now as it were.

  • @Eastbayrob

    @Eastbayrob

    Жыл бұрын

    Same. That line lives rent free in my dome.

  • @matthewmcdermott1955

    @matthewmcdermott1955

    Жыл бұрын

    @@renaissancefairyowldemon7686 He got it right. He's talking about a podcast.

  • @austink641
    @austink6413 жыл бұрын

    17:29 That Aquinas quote though - oofff, that was dark.

  • @caylyn111
    @caylyn1115 жыл бұрын

    rick is a legendary teacher

  • @leogorgone4414
    @leogorgone44146 жыл бұрын

    *quotes Joy Division* why isn't this man my father?!

  • @NewScottishGentry

    @NewScottishGentry

    6 жыл бұрын

    And Heathers! and he loves drinkin' and fightin' and bangin'. Wish this homie was still around!

  • @voyagersa22

    @voyagersa22

    2 жыл бұрын

    Do you know what Joy Division song he quotes? Closest I see is Heart and Soul’s line “there’s no turning back, no last stand” (not “last man”)

  • @leomiller2291

    @leomiller2291

    Жыл бұрын

    For real!

  • @gengar1187

    @gengar1187

    11 ай бұрын

    Cos you're not a poet who lives in texas6

  • @mythnow
    @mythnow10 жыл бұрын

    I'm really enjoying these videos. What a treat!

  • @nightoftheworld
    @nightoftheworld4 жыл бұрын

    28:20 According to Zizek though we are defined now by a type of cynical belief-in the sense that we claim to not believe, but actually believe more than ever quasi-nihilistically.

  • @andrewgodly5739

    @andrewgodly5739

    3 жыл бұрын

    I mean this was at a time where there was still a working class spirit, but it was slowly dying, and a time not too far off from the fall of the soviet union. The current age is a culture more as zizek put it. A culture so consumed by capitalism that it's the new dominant religion. To even counter the foundations of capitalism causes people to have seizures. As if the population was born in an isolation chamber and never saw daylight. Question the logic of private property and you'll either be seen as a demon or as though you were mad. Like being burned alive for heresy in the dark ages.

  • @sighcity
    @sighcity2 ай бұрын

    34:08 Rick Roderick reading The Madman. I just love how he reads it…

  • @firesermon22
    @firesermon2211 жыл бұрын

    this is how a good lecture should look like, thumps up!

  • @chipgowest
    @chipgowest12 жыл бұрын

    this is amazing. thanks for uploading!

  • @michaelhebert7338
    @michaelhebert73386 жыл бұрын

    Very well done thanks for sharing.

  • @7kurisu
    @7kurisu11 жыл бұрын

    its almost as if the world submitted itself to nice, dull and predictable lives in exchange for comfort, not having to think and enjoying a dominion over nature. our victory is so total we think nature to be quaint, including our own, and lack any real feelings. this is a great trial for humanity, one i doubt even the dynamic capitalism can endure

  • @jamescoughlin6357

    @jamescoughlin6357

    Жыл бұрын

    It is a trial sure, but our species will prevail

  • @janvierkasra3375

    @janvierkasra3375

    4 ай бұрын

    And prevail it shall, but in what guise does it cloak itself? The contemplation of its forthcoming form might indeed stir a fear more profound than we'd dare confront... and that's rather terrifying @@jamescoughlin6357

  • @trismegistus4275
    @trismegistus42754 жыл бұрын

    thanks for this series! wow. and the lecture notes too. I think they should say "mere historicism" not "mirror" though

  • @gijslimonard6583
    @gijslimonard65832 жыл бұрын

    Awesome post, thanks 👌🏻

  • @willfourth
    @willfourth10 жыл бұрын

    I'd love to see a tombstone that said, "Bill O'Reilly...sold tires..."

  • @furiousflotsam

    @furiousflotsam

    9 жыл бұрын

    Not a fan of O'Reilly but what's wrong with selling tires? /

  • @stuka80

    @stuka80

    8 жыл бұрын

    +john smith nothing, but instead focus on what that sentence was intended for, that O'Reilly is unimportant.

  • @christopherhamilton3621

    @christopherhamilton3621

    Ай бұрын

    If only he did, instead of being a harbinger of what Fox News was to become…

  • @caylynmillard6047
    @caylynmillard60476 жыл бұрын

    Amazing teacher

  • @existentialistmark6418
    @existentialistmark64185 жыл бұрын

    32:55 zero books clip

  • @tehzoh

    @tehzoh

    5 жыл бұрын

    zerobooks is worst channel ever

  • @nikolademitri731

    @nikolademitri731

    3 жыл бұрын

    Jessy Carthage EVER? Awh, come on, man!

  • @dethkon

    @dethkon

    3 жыл бұрын

    Jessy Carthage they’re a good publisher though. RIP Mark Fisher.

  • @jimmyv1607

    @jimmyv1607

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@tehzoh Why is that?

  • @tehzoh

    @tehzoh

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@jimmyv1607 pure obscurism

  • @raginald7mars408
    @raginald7mars4085 жыл бұрын

    Enter your comments here... As a German Biologist Ph D -The first video I saw, I fell deeply in Love with this wonderful Man! A true Fossil. Now extinct. The last of this 19th Century Minds... I preserve each Atom of him. Thank God for the Videos he recorded!!!!!

  • @Kobe29261
    @Kobe292619 жыл бұрын

    What a teacher!

  • @Cooliofamily
    @Cooliofamily6 ай бұрын

    The righteous ire that he held for the bourgeoisie…. Unless we wish to die in that interregnum, in the world where the tobacco barons are the ones consecrated, we must quickly make up new ways to live. ✊

  • @FourtyParsecs
    @FourtyParsecs2 жыл бұрын

    I'm here for 32:55.

  • @NoelComiX
    @NoelComiX11 жыл бұрын

    No disrespect. Good talking to you.

  • @truesemite
    @truesemite11 жыл бұрын

    Though i'm a Marxist, i agree with Nietzsche that being utterly dogmatic about an ideology is taking it too far and takes away the agency of being an individual. being a Marxist doesn't mean you have to be a Stoic and shout "all is vain" I agree with Nietzsche that there's no sin in fulfilling ones desires, in a rational manner, since we only live once. hedonistic pleasure for Nietzsche is about being a free individual unrestricted by culture, including bourgeois culture, .i.e being yourself.

  • @napoleonbonaparteempereurd4676

    @napoleonbonaparteempereurd4676

    4 жыл бұрын

    @UNABOMBER MANIFESTO A dogmatic anti-Marxist? Opinion invalid and uncreative.

  • @dethkon

    @dethkon

    3 жыл бұрын

    UNABOMBER MANIFESTO At least she has an opinion (our Marxist friend; I don’t particularly care what your or anyone else’s political tendencies or ideologies are in this context). I find it interesting, most of it rings true, I’m going to think about it. But you, on the other hand, either have not taken the time to make of an interpretation of your own, or if you have, are too unsure of yourself to profer one. I find this offensive, or at the least, unproductive. “No investigation, no right to speak.”

  • @sammesserschmidt9317
    @sammesserschmidt9317 Жыл бұрын

    "and today, world spirit may just be advertising"

  • @thisisnotkerdis8142
    @thisisnotkerdis81422 жыл бұрын

    anyone from mr shantz's class here

  • @robertvillegas1953
    @robertvillegas19532 жыл бұрын

    My Hero! Soy del Paso Tejas !

  • @beaubostick6935
    @beaubostick69353 жыл бұрын

    Rip to the prophet Rick

  • @michaelmartelly5503
    @michaelmartelly5503Ай бұрын

    31:46 I feel the same way

  • @happinesstan
    @happinesstan3 жыл бұрын

    "an eye for an eye leaves the entire world blind" That's the trouble with outsourcing.

  • @truesemite
    @truesemite11 жыл бұрын

    Examples of fall of Rome and third Reich are terrible counter examples to Nietzsche's arguments. Read him carefully and you'll find that he's completely opposed to mass ideology (Third Reich) or state power (Rome) his focus is on individual power not collective. Saying that his philosophy is responsible for the actions of some hippies or the Third Reich is the same as saying Jesus is responsible for the acts of the Vatican...also "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword" Matthew 10:34

  • @gravenewworld6521
    @gravenewworld65213 жыл бұрын

    13:40

  • @jamesferry1523
    @jamesferry15232 жыл бұрын

    He references both the movie Heathers and the band Joy Division at the 27 minute mark. This guy is awesome!

  • @voyagersa22

    @voyagersa22

    2 жыл бұрын

    Do you know what Joy Division song he quotes? Closest I see is Heart and Soul’s line “there’s no turning back, no last stand” (not “last man”)

  • @jamesferry1523

    @jamesferry1523

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@voyagersa22 Correct, with your correction on the lyric. He also slightly flubs the Heathers quote (it's "Woodstock for the 80s," not the 90s, but we'll cut him some slack.

  • @tarhunta2111
    @tarhunta211110 ай бұрын

    As soon as he mentioned Aquinas, i tuned out.

  • @christopherhamilton3621

    @christopherhamilton3621

    Ай бұрын

    LOL. Where are/were the modern Aquinas’s of America? Snowflake…

  • @ubergenie6041
    @ubergenie60415 жыл бұрын

    I love some of these old videos but I can't help picturing those who gave up votes as a auditorium filled with the Kevin Kline character from the movie, "A Fish Called Wanda."

  • @happinesstan
    @happinesstan3 жыл бұрын

    Russell Crowe or Christian Bale could play this guy.

  • @uberwolf1424
    @uberwolf1424Ай бұрын

    43:00

  • @michaelmartelly5503
    @michaelmartelly550313 күн бұрын

    42:58

  • @jvladcliff4083
    @jvladcliff40832 жыл бұрын

    Wow!

  • @NoelComiX
    @NoelComiX11 жыл бұрын

    But I will also say that people have free will and are responsible for their own actions. An ideology or mode of production can only ventriloquolize to a point.

  • @NoelComiX
    @NoelComiX10 жыл бұрын

    No disrespect

  • @richk9126
    @richk91268 жыл бұрын

    Getting real drunk! Lol

  • @ubergenie6041
    @ubergenie60415 жыл бұрын

    7:30 we here an example in support of the typology of the straw Christian that introduces a monk who is denying the flesh. Strangely after a year or so this monk is said to have eroticized everything. It is inexplicable as to how this happens or why a monk is in any way they standard for our straw Christian since having known 10s of thousands of Christians across the last half century of all stripes and denominations I have yet to meet one monk. Jesus and his disciples were not monastic. We do see monasticism rise in the 6th century through the early scholastic period the monks care for the poor and the weak and the infirm, and maintain the highest intellectual culture. Roderick or Nietzsche in the hands of Roderick seems to have an inexhaustible a out of straw qua the moral Christian archetype.

  • @nightoftheworld

    @nightoftheworld

    4 жыл бұрын

    Uber Genie I think he has a bone to pick with southern baptists.

  • @polarnj
    @polarnj10 жыл бұрын

    ugh, noel...While I'm aware you're conclusions are right in a hard left political context - the ONLY context for Orthodox Marxist interpretation, if i'm not mistaken. What philosophy could possibly be found acceptable to you if not based on historical materialism? And while it doesn't please me to say this, as it seems I'm now "post-left" and I cringe at mass consumerism, but although he was right to propose an alternative, speculative dialectics produced a flawed theory.

  • @NoelComiX
    @NoelComiX10 жыл бұрын

    We'll have to agreed to disagree. lol But I think Nietzsche is highly over rated (especially in academia) and projected things he hated about himself on those he resented. I don't think God is dead, but Nietzsche's death of God parable is pretty much spot on concerning the role of religion in an industrial capitalist society (a society he was deeply molded by whether he wanted to admit it or not.)

  • @polarnj
    @polarnj10 жыл бұрын

    I'm so used to defended the left on here this is a strange position for me, but Nietzsche himself is the total antithesis of your description! Remember that Marx and predecessor Hegel lived under Capitalism and lived less ascetic lives than Nietzsche! He was essentially a monk in lifestyle. Don't dump Ayn Rand on him! ha. I see N and Marx as visionaries with uncanny foresight and flawless deconstructions of the 2 systems of Western control. Oh yea, and Dionysus is awesome!

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii79412 жыл бұрын

    A sexual thought

  • @ubergenie6041
    @ubergenie60415 жыл бұрын

    11:30 "The first thing the devil does in the Bible is to teach Eve to interpret." Has Roderick lost his mind? The first instance of postmodern interpretation is when the serpent is said to "Deceive," Eve, by saying, "There is no authorial meaning in God's text!" This is such rampant anti-intellectual intellectualism that Roderick should be lecturing at Yale! Of course the old refrain of, "Your not properly interpreting Nietzsche," or worst, "Roderick," will be uttered by those who don't want to argue the evidence but would rather lay down a trail of red herring.

  • @applez4life200

    @applez4life200

    4 жыл бұрын

    I think you're missing his point. The snake "deceives" Eve, by asking her to interpret meaning. The deception is a byproduct of her beginning to interpret God's authority.

  • @hopelessstrlstfan181
    @hopelessstrlstfan1812 жыл бұрын

    Well, he's fun to listen to & he's also part of the movement that led to the mess the West is in now that we're in 2022.

  • @lutherblissett9070

    @lutherblissett9070

    2 жыл бұрын

    you're completely wrong

  • @hopelessstrlstfan181

    @hopelessstrlstfan181

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@lutherblissett9070 , OK. Sorry, I stand corrected. He actually has in no way promoted the ideas which are currently undermining the legacy of Western Civilization which introduced the concept of Citizenship, Republican Forms of government, Universal Inalienable Rights (which led to the West being the 1st Civilization to fight against the Woldwide Institution of slavery & the fact that American Blacks are the wealthiest Black population in the world despite the tragic history we all acknowledge) & etc when he instead promoted the ideas from the radical strain of Continental Philosophy which called for the undoing of Western Civilization & he further made the dialog which is fundamental to democratic & republican institutions more difficult by inculcating contempt in his students (of a prestigious University which like other such Universities essentially are the formers of the ruling orthodox ideology of the Administrative State & the MSM) for the institutions of Western cultures & those who would defend them. Thanks for straightening me out. I was such a fool to think that this professor who was a 1960's radical Marxist who admitted his interest in anti-estanlishment activities & whose works included the promotion of the Frankfurt School & Critical Theory (a Marxist philosophy, look it up on the Stanford University website known as "The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy," it's free and has lot of peer reviewed articles) actually believed what he taught & had an influence via his students at Duke & the Teaching Company who promoted his work outside of the classroom. Silly me. I was such a fool. Thanks, bro

  • @lutherblissett9070

    @lutherblissett9070

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@hopelessstrlstfan181 I accept your concession.

  • @hopelessstrlstfan181

    @hopelessstrlstfan181

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@lutherblissett9070 & my sarcasm as well. You can't have one without the other, amigo.

  • @plaidchuck

    @plaidchuck

    3 ай бұрын

    Keep blaming that boogeyman for all of your perceived ills

  • @ubergenie6041
    @ubergenie60415 жыл бұрын

    6 mins in we get a strawman version (I assume it originates with Nietzsche not the speaker) of Christian teach about loving one's enemy). These strawmen work marvelously on the uneducated but produce undercutting defeaters that attenuate the polemic every time they occur for those who have had the benefit of a logic 101 class.

  • @coolworx
    @coolworx9 жыл бұрын

    Does any one else think Neitzshe was channeling every adolescent boys selfishness?

  • @kagame6524

    @kagame6524

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Noah Namey Hmm, how so?

  • @charlescascales647

    @charlescascales647

    7 жыл бұрын

    No. Nietzsche was extraordinarily generous and not a materialistic person. I've read nearly everything he wrote as well as his letters to his friends. He was not selfish in any way.

  • @coolworx

    @coolworx

    7 жыл бұрын

    Charles Cascales But he was very much elitist. There's always been a class war raging.