Without any images, you made a perfect explanation.

One more thing I'd like to add, being the guy who implements teamwork platforms for ArchiCAD/BIMCloud, I think this is a very important topic, as in many cases companies will need a solid collaboration solution, that might not be relevant for a solo user, but for the performance of the whole company I think ArchiCAD's BimServer/BIMCloud solutions are much more mature. Also the matter of what hardware you need to build the same thing in ArchiCAD Vs Revit, IMHO ArchiCAD uses much less resources to do the same task.

Coming from commercial construction, there are a few big differences that always made my decision easier. #1-Interoperability, and being able to live link in PDFs (contract docs) #2-3D Working Environment, and gaining perspective on your modeling #3-Reporting Engine, and being able to shape and modify data with ease. Those who appreciate this functionality know my obvious preference. But both tools are powerful and continue to get better, one just at a faster pace :)

@digirobot

6 жыл бұрын

ContraBIM so which is your choice?

@CONTRABIM

6 жыл бұрын

ArchiCAD is best in class for what I do... I view it more as the ideal content management tool, something that can bring all formats together for enhanced review, and creating optimal project context. Revit may be more widely used in commercial construction, but I'm ok with that as I maintain my competitive advantage again and again :)

@JashanDeepsingh3

2 жыл бұрын

@@CONTRABIM Love your videos, Indeed Archicad is much better, has everytihng in one place. While using Revit it was really frustrating with all these families.

Worth sharing..Thanks for your effort. Really helps a lot.

I've been working my whole life with Revit in my firm, yet I prefer Archicad whenever I do my own projects solely for the fact that I don't need any other program other than maybe Photoshop to pair with it. I can do conceptual massing with ease (no sketchup needed), I can make detail drawings with ease (no autocad needed) and I can arrange my presentation boards right there within the program.

@ChilombeSimwami

5 жыл бұрын

I do the same thing: at work, we have to use Revit (and AutoCAD), but for personal projects, I use ArchiCAD for everything...

@MegaBorisV

5 жыл бұрын

How could it be? Revit is new product, how you can use it all life? in 1998 it was autocad R14 and no revit

@Nay300zx

5 жыл бұрын

If you truly have used it @your whole life@ and still don't know how to do detail drawings in Revit and opt to do them in AutoCAD instead- well you will most likly be fired from your firm very soon. Google Revit draughting view or dont BS

@archist9789

4 жыл бұрын

@MgaBorisV and Nay The replies of you guys sound very childish.

@Nel_23

4 жыл бұрын

@@archist9789 nay a is right tho. You can do detailing in revit without autocad. You can even do conceptual massing in revit. Heck, you can also do rendering presentations in revit, tho i prefer using ps for that

You're the best teacher ever. Thanks for your explanation.

I use Archicad after having used Revit for 1 year: no comparison if you’re an architect) archicad is flexible and friendly

@Adrian-dm6dp

4 жыл бұрын

Me too

@LuisEduardo-sh2nu

4 жыл бұрын

Made my chocie. Going to download Archicad

@JoshHarris9395

3 жыл бұрын

If you know what you're doing in Revit there isn't much you can't do. But I completely understand what you're saying. I think a lot of practices dislike Revit because of its complexity. I've used Revit for 6 years now but considering switching over to ArchiCAD.

@LalalHaihing1

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you . Was just thinking what to start with after using sketch up for years. Going for archicad now.

Thank you man, just in time.

Thank you very much, your review is so important to me cause I'm a designer.now I'm happy that I`m using Archicad as I'm not into construction details, so I will never face a problem with my design, Thank you again.

Yes: I have been waiting for this.

Thank you for video. I chose also Revit for the reson of student licence. In our compani we buy the AEC collection and its very cook package. Nice work.

This was so helpful!! Thank you

Site modeling, Site View, Ceiling Command, In-place Updateable Groups, Temporary levels, temporary dimensions are great in Revit. ArchiCAD is faster than revit. navigating is better in ArchiCAD. It is more user friendly.

Good job, man. Thanks for this video. I tryed both... And I prefer the Archicad!

@ar.rajeshpatil9639

5 жыл бұрын

yes, indeed ArchiCAD is great software..

@fredsoncsilva

4 жыл бұрын

@@ar.rajeshpatil9639 Me too!

@khuongdong8854

4 жыл бұрын

Can you tell me why you prefer Archicad than Revit ? Thanks

@vananle6764

4 жыл бұрын

Khuong Dong archicad là phần mềm đk phát triển bởi team kiến trúc sư. Nó thân thiện hơn

@khuongdong8854

4 жыл бұрын

@@vananle6764 Bạn ơi bạn có tài liệu gì hướng dẫn sử dụng archicad không cho mình xin với? Thanks

The main difference is the software approach. Archicad is focused on architectural design under a collaborative environment, where it coexists in a work ecosystem that promotes the use of the best BIM software and Revit is focused on engineering under an Autodesk environment. Free world vs Monopoly.

@VIA-studio

6 жыл бұрын

Couldn't said it better

@michellemarques2670

6 жыл бұрын

Naida Vucic "a common user" could tell you the same. Trust me, who knows how Revit works and knows Archicad, loves Archicad. At least here in Brasil everyone I talked who tried to implement Revit and Archicad prefers Archicad...

@deathblade909

6 жыл бұрын

Exactly, also the winners with revit are the contractors who make money

@GhadyKhalil

6 жыл бұрын

Android vs Apple :P

@juliandavidac

6 жыл бұрын

the big fat truth

This is 2022, I just realized what is for the Dynamo icon in my desktop. Thanks Balkan.

you have now more viewers... best wishes... 😍😍👍👍

I liked your honesty about liking revit better! I subbed cause of it.

The best, honest explanation I have ever heard. Thank You!

I have been working with Autocad LT for about 18 years and like it very much, I also have the subscription for Autocad LT and Revit LT . Thanks for the video.

Thank you very much for the valuable information

Archicad has most of the things you are looking for as an architect, if you really know how to use it (the complex shape design and quality rendering), But I would really love to try Revit

I liked the video. I actually waited for a long time for a video that tells me what am I missing not using Revit. Personally, I am an ArchiCAD user and fan but I cannot hide my admiration for your presentation and Revit as well!

yo bro, really thankya. Big respect

Thank you sir. I like your videos

I got addicted to watching your videos💜💥

thanks a lot!!! so nice reverb

I use Revit for my external 3D while ArchiCad for all interior 3D

I've been working with Autocad for 32 years. Revit for the last 4 or 5 years and I'm trying to pick up MicroStation and AECOism now too. Here in the UK Network Rail, one of my employers main clients need to have drawings supplied in dng format. I'd rather model structures in Revit but I guess those needed for our rail projects will need to be done in AECOism. I wonder if doing them in Revit and exporting them as dgn files provided all the elements are supported.

You are awesome man😍

helpful. many thanks

Hi milo. Love you! It is ‘which is better?’

Haven't seen anybody said that Revit doesn't run on Macs.

@zzrgio

3 жыл бұрын

exactly...

I dropped archicad after Learning Revit in a proper way. Nowadays architects can’t work separately alone and the interoperability between all professional Entities is extremely important. Besides Archicad has some limits, by not having the full engine capacity to integrate a Massing modelling ( Morph Tools ) within the BIM culture. The model can look nice but the Plans are never reflecting the model and never updated. And for me this is a limit. While a massing in Revit can be easily be updated in the plans and sections. Anyway this a personal experience and i hope i am wrong. Thanks

Balkan 😇 thank you too much . You don't know me . But you are helping me very very very much . Thank you . For hundreds of very amazing videos 😍❤❤❤

Давно пытаюсь решить, что удобнее из этих программ. Ранее работал в Архикаде. Сейчас изучаю Ревит. На мой взгляд в Архикаде гораздо удобнее работать в 3Д окне, это для архитектора на стадии концептуального проектирования очень важно!

Hello, mr Balkan. I prefer Revit. Because I'm scan-to-bim specialist. So I work with point clouds, and Revit is wayyy more optimised to work with point cloud than ArchiCAD. Yes, it's difficult to learn Revit, especially at the beginning, but after you understand the way it works, definetely it's a good tool to model projects from point clouds.

@izoyt

5 жыл бұрын

may i ask how much expertise with point clouds and archicad do you have?

I use both software, but the winner is ArchiCAD. The UI is much better and more sofisticated, and easier to creates drawings and layouts with much more flexibility. All together more suitable for design and plan creation. Revit has only one advantage: MEP.

I tried ArchiCad and Revit back in 2000. I'd been using Revit since then.

Archicad looks more intuitive, simple and for architects at my eyes. It works very well and does 2D and 3D at the same time.

@abyudelyakem6449

4 жыл бұрын

so does revit

@Vannam123

2 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, Archicad does not work realtime between views like in Revit.

@usuario314

Жыл бұрын

You're right, sadly Archicad is not to common and studios ask for Revit :´(

@manoloterranova414

Жыл бұрын

@@Vannam123 well if you have a big monitor and move the view windows (section, ground floor, first floor ...) You can!

Currently working on a large project with Revit. We have 14 people working on the same model. It is a complete disaster. Constant syncing problems. Don’t buy Revit if a project requires more than 8 people.

@3DHOLLYWAR

5 жыл бұрын

now we working with 10 people in one project in one file/ The project consists of 5 sections of different heights and parking from 4 to 26 floors. The project in the archicade works fairly quickly.

@patriklundqvist6237

5 жыл бұрын

I have +30 people working in one Revit model, (with lots of links), on different locations without issues. Performance is much more than just the software, its about hardware specs, model managing, workflows etc..

@romanvssvmromania

5 жыл бұрын

And how did you get to the conclusion that the disaster is caused by the software (Revit)? In my case, at the office we have 8-12 people on the same Archicad Server. If we work more than 4 people on one project, there are serious delays because the server is just too old. I mean in our case we are not blaming Archicad for our hardware issues (and lazy managers who just won't spend any money on a new server). I think you should call a server engineer and a Revit tehnincian in order to solve your problems which I think are more of hardware and workflow than software.

@waterblading

5 жыл бұрын

Sounds like you need an It Guy. I have done couple of projects with 12 to 18 people and no Sync issues. I Believe Revit is better for large projects.

@aslamba7035

4 жыл бұрын

How much do they pay?

For you mr. balkan .check the KCC for Archicad 22 where you can see the new facade tool in archicad also its connection to grasshopper and the imagination limited conceptual design 4. .check the data management part in the Kcc. .MEP modeler for mechanical engineering is already implemented in archicad since archicad 20. .Rhino export / import without damaging the geometry and joining it into one object as revit does. .conceptual massing is a plus for revit but rhino/archicad acts better as in both cases ur working in separate files.

@ARQUIVAS

6 жыл бұрын

Mahmoud El-Moussa besides that Archicad is absolutely more costumizable than Revit. That was a wrong information.

@izoyt

5 жыл бұрын

mahmoud nails it. take notes, ba.

rabbit or archicat?

thank you so much dude you're a god

Boss tNice tutorials mate, thanks

You can use formit 360 for Sketchup type its also inter operable with revit

I think both softwares are good, refer whichever you required.

Some have mentioned it already but still - only ArchiCAD works on mac and that makes it much more user-friendly in the first place.

They should pay you! Your videos are awesome! Any question I have I KZread search if you have a video for it FIRST and there hasn't been many times that you don't. Thank you!

Hello there, I like the way you explain things ... do you do tutorials on Archicad? thank you

I love you tutorial

The huge potential of the Archicad is the GDL, and in Revit it's just a family very much in a primitive script language. I am a person who works professionally (including programming) and in Allplan and Revit, but Allplan is very truncated by GDL from Archicad, but he does not leave any chances Revit put anything on the scales.

now to used Revit and i am studying Archicad as well :D

Can we take a second to appreciate how well this guy speaks English for someone his age and who doesn't have English as his first language!

@ShubhamPatil-rl4jk

3 жыл бұрын

I don't know, English is my third language and I can speak fluently, little better than him

Thank you for your video. I work with Revit for more than 12 years. I'ld like to try Archicad but your video is not enough accurate to me because you stay in the general not explaining points as structural connection, topography, rebar, ... (Revit's lacks) I'll try soon Revit 2020, and see if there are betterments... My Revit library has more than 15.000 objets and a lot of them were made by myself. I'm working in French Polynesia with lot of adaptations to tropical conditions and for specific projects i had to manage (factories, auditorium, care center, ...) Thank you again. You make a very very good work.

I love Revit. But wish to learn and master in ArchiCAD as well.

@RA-gz7ns

3 жыл бұрын

We are completely opposite

I always tend to go back to Archicad anytime I use Revit. but a lot of firms are using Reivit so I don't know

I'm switching from ArchiCAD to Revit (after 3 years AC) and you're helping me with that at the moment. Thank you for that 😅! Btw how did you learn Dynamo?

@timmykartel8911

2 жыл бұрын

how's the going? Was the transition successful?

This is the best free software Ive seen. Respect.

Lets talk about IFC: there's only one model checker commonly used around the world: Solibri. Now lets talk about IFC quality when exported from Archicad and Revit and read into Solibri: Archicad does great, Revit bug sometimes. Why? Revit/Adsk is more worried to develop its process inside its "bubble", while ArchiCAD is worried about OPEN BIM, that means real BIM cause you'll never do a big bim inside a bubble unless this bubble have all kind of softwares, a pretty hard thing...

@patriklundqvist6237

5 жыл бұрын

Revit "bug" sometimes, do you have any examples (not related to a specific Project)?

@craigjohnson4271

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah... I'm in the US, and every large contractor uses Navis not Solibri. The only models they usually get in IFC form are out of Tekla and from steel subs. Structural guys use Revit. And coordinating back and forth with consultants using IFC isnt great. Open BIM is like Android and Apple phones working in harmony. Great in theory. I wish it worked better, but I think it's a long long way off.

You make me want to become an architect. I always wanted to as a kid because I was into drawing and enjoyed drawing homes and designs but I never ended up taking it anywhere. Now it’s too late to go back to school and spend the amount of time it requires to graduate with papers. Do you know if there are workers in that industry that are self taught ? Is it possible ?

@elcapitan6126

4 жыл бұрын

it's possible if you don't mind making little money :) it seems to be a profession that is slowly shrinking in demand due to automation and oversupply of eager students who have a passion for architecture despite the shrinking demand.

You discuss a "Clash of the Titans" but forget to mention Vectorworks! All of the features of both in one program. No need for external plug ins or switching back and forth between external programs. All in one program with ability to do all of the functionality including cross platform (both MAC & PC), ability to work in 2D & 3D seamlessly, Fully customizable tools, creative parametric modeling for ultimate freedom to design, site modeling for detailed use of site data including GIS & point cloud data, true BIM workflow with OpenBIM standards, graphical scripting for algorithmic means to orchestrate and dictate design forms and customizations without programming experience, exceptional presentation graphics with customized styles so you can produce just the right look you need - AND BEST OF ALL - no subscription! You OWN IT FOREVER!!

i used first archicad in university, like 4 years and switched to revit because of my job. (1,5 years) . main difference imo. archicad can import almost every file format, revit cant (pdf verctorisation not possible etc) archicad can export almost every file format, revit cant rendering is WAY BETTER with the cinerender than revit. having 2d and 3d drafting possibilities in archicad ist worrh GOLD and much better than in revit (worksheets / blueprints( i know revit has it too, but works smoother) revit is very good but i just miss some features of archicad in it. revit is lacking on some crucial points to be better than Archicad. if you have archicad you dont need illustrator, Photoshop, or indesign. wich is a huuuuuge benifit.

@lvseka

5 жыл бұрын

I know, the 2D working environment in Archicad is just gold

@rachman5356

4 жыл бұрын

Danke

I think archicad has a better ui and fluidity of work is good. although revit is industry standard, archicad is better in terms of drafting or modeling in 3d. It just feels cleaner neater and more real. Archicad is really simple and very easy to learn.

I lIke " Visualization "..... By The Way, Very Informative Video........... Thanks Man

I use revit, it's not so friendly as archicad, but I don't have experience on rendering with Revit yet, so I use 3d max to render as to show to clients. But I am learning more on you tube . I think Autodesk have to develope more Revit, so can be more friendly to work .

@faresjawad3096

5 жыл бұрын

try lumion 8 and forget all other render and vis. softwares

Huge thing about student license is that archicad projects that get made with student license cannot be opened with a full license, only a student one. So I have friends that made their final project using a student license and later on payed for the program and wanted to use their project on their portfolio and was a pain to access it...

Am a big fan of archicad, I had a very fast approach on archicad over revit

@balkanarch da li držiš (ili možeš da preporučiš ) neku školu ) za časove archicada/revita?

In you're video you compare a lot of things but glance over one if the most important things. In order to work in a good BIM workflow on a project the proper and easy way of generating correct IFC files is vital. As you say both can work with IFC but it takes so much more effort to create it from revit. Archicad is almost works natively with IFC parameters, which results in a smooth import and export. In many countries it is mandatory to deliver proper IFC files, thats why this is so important. In that department archicad is superior. All the other features you mention depend on the philosphy and the office and how designers and engineers prefer to work, both are great for each task. I think good BIM shouldn't depend on the software of one company, thats why Open BIM is so important. Lets keep developers revit, archicad, allplan, vectorworks and so many more focussed on an open workflow as users. Interact with them, let them know what is important to us users.

i used archicad after being a revit user for 5 years , it was very enjoyable to how easy archicad can be specifically to how fast its the archicad blocks can be manipulated from inside the project no hassle needed , for small uncomplex projects archicad is a clear winner , but after a while i started meeting its limitation and the work around i had to do to get over some of the things revit does faster and easier so i immediately went back to revit , in my opinion the parameters and options revit gives you to control your project are uncompelled by any other architecture program . overall revit is just a better BIM program .

@RM-xk6iu

4 жыл бұрын

Hi! Now that you have used both, could you give an example of the limits you found in archicad? And also in which situations Revit is faster with the parameters you mention.

aweso Video!!! tNice tutorials helpped a lot

I hear yah mate.

Maybe it's less and less relevant in a BIM world, but at our office the deliverables are still traditional technical drawings, and i've found the management of sheets and model views ridiculously overcomplicated and inefficient in Revit. You can't place a view on several sheets, you can't align the views without the help of a grid (still no Osnaps), can't link data from external files, can't really format your content to any acceptable degree. This aspect was not even mentioned in the video, but if your workflow includes traditional printed plans, it is a real everyday hassle in Revit. If you want to make pretty layouts for a presentation for your clients or even for an architectural competition, you can absolutely do that in ArchiCAD and you absolutely can't do that in Revit. Correct me if I'm wrong, these are my experiences with Revit2016.

@slug182

5 жыл бұрын

ambrus kiss Thats good to know. Im an expert Revit user, and I always thought that this was a problem for Revit, you cant really do much with the layouts of sheets, or even with schedules, not many customizing options. Im currently learning Archicad, so you could say its a bit more friendly in that area? Thanks.

@ambruskiss4492

5 жыл бұрын

I think paper space in AC is much like a model space with 2D elements (and that's just not true for Revit). You can for example explode any 2D or 3D view into actual paper space elements like lines and hatches, and make really nice custom graphics out of your 3D model. Now that's what I call customizable in an architectural context. All you can do in Revit is changing the display properties of your actual 3D elements (which is also quite powerful in itself). In this aspect AC is a very good visualisation tool for architects, where Revit is rather a standardised tool for engineers without high visual expectations.

@gueryfrank6689

4 жыл бұрын

use revit 2020 and you will be happy

@gueryfrank6689

4 жыл бұрын

try the version of revit 2021 is much better and more professional than any other program

I tried both. Archicad becomes unbearably slow when working on a bigger project or when dealing with a complex shape. Try modeling the same complex shape in both softwares and the difference becomes really clear. It is awfull when working with meshes, modifying them is a nightmare or when modeling custom shapes, etc.... For me the Archicad is a looser.

Visual.. Vishal . Vishualization ... Visualization 😻

I know that ARCHICAD is many time better of Revit...but why (here in Italy) every studios requests Revit and no-one Archicad? Second consideration, Archicad is better as single program for a project. But I think that if you add Revit + Inventor + Vault you can manage every single question of a project from concept to executive.

Could be better if you talked about performance and compatibility between different platforms.

ARCHICAD and TWINMOTION

@willavillar82

3 жыл бұрын

hello, may I ask are they the best software combination for designing building? is Twinmotion the best rendering for Archicad?

@Dalma1950

3 жыл бұрын

@@willavillar82 for me yes

Revit is an Architects dream come true!!! I send my students to your tutorials. They are excellent. Thank you!

What about workin with a point clound? Which software is better to use if i want to build a house in 3d from a point cloud? Thanks for your replay ;)

I use Archicad and the conceptual design you are talking of is very well OK in AC 22 and it give you a better and more detail construction drawings.

Good day friend From where should i start a stage with levels, like singers or show stages ? shall i open an architecture file and do it on levels ? can you help ........ thanks in advance

YES! I LOVE YOU!

My first software in Architecture was SketchUp. I was very happy with it, but I wasn't able to do "real projects" with SketchUp. Because of this, I migrated to Archicad+Rhino+Grasshopper. that was an amazing combination. after 3 years, I joined a great team as an interior designer/modeler (I work with 3Ds Max as well). The main software of the team was Revit. I tried Revit for first time there and I surprised! after that, I learned Revit and other Autodesk Architectural and Civil softwares such as Civil3d and Advance Steel (I knew Autocad) as well as Infraworks. Now I work on large scale projects. but I always say small projects are more interesting. You can use every software you want, Revit, Archicad, SketchUp, Rhino, 3Ds Max, Vectorworks, Cheif Architect, FormZ and so on. But if you want to work on "real projects" go for Revit or Archicad. In large scale projects, Revit (Autodesk platform) is way to go. Good luck.

@gueryfrank6689

4 жыл бұрын

which program do you prefer revit or archicad?

@Masoud_Amiri

4 жыл бұрын

@@gueryfrank6689 Revit

@Masoud_Amiri

4 жыл бұрын

@Pak Entertainment Archicad is better for you It's easier to learn and simpler to work.

You need to upload a video for revit renderings with vray

For that money you mentioned, you get the whole collection including Audocad, 3dsMAX and a lot more.

@faresjawad3096

5 жыл бұрын

Manuel Bänziger who needs 3dsmax these days ( architects ) i mean .

I use Revit since Version 2.1 , I think in 2002 approx. I tried Archicad in those days as well, I choose Revit since then because is more intuitive. I recently was looking Tutorials of Archicad to compare. I have seen how is done structural connections and unique shapes of Beams. But seem to be done one by one in the Project rather than an element type (Family). My question is, if an structural connection is designed in the project as a unique thing. Is there a way in archicad to convert other beams and other columns the same type? Is possible to apply the same detail globally? I don't know if I explained my self. The tutorial I have seen brags how easy was to customize the beam and column to detail a connection but I did not see they can convert it in to a global solution or multiple instances. I wonder if is even possible. So far I like Revit much better. Less steps to do things.

@NBCNothingButCrap

4 жыл бұрын

If you are an engineer.. stay with Revit. I have to admit Revit is more better at certain point.

Suggestion. How to use Rhino with grasshopper

QUESTION PLEASE ! What is the best option for rendering in Archicad?

I am learning Revit and find it so slow and tedious. Archicad seems to have all the libraries in visual format, and looks like you can update sizes, configurations all in one go, rather than in Revit where you have to collect or build a whole bunch of different components to choose from. And detailing! Very stuck with creating thin roof eaves in Revit...Grrrrr!

@khairulusacc3550

2 жыл бұрын

You cant learn things fast unless you put heart to it. I used revit for many years and managed to do hundred thousand dollars of project. It just works and faster than Autocad. The only thing revit weak is interior designing which takes long time and i rather use alternate like Lumion colab with revit. So far i have no problem with that combo

@RM-xk6iu

2 жыл бұрын

Hope you learned it and accepted its inherent slopiness or ditched it by now

thank u so much sir for this content, now i'm going to learn revit.

People or designer look allways about easy , not complexe and simple tools in order to present their work so in the end the important product is your design your idea ... i worked with both and for me archicade is the best programme for architects and specially buildings designs

Sounds you're using Rhino with grasshopper... Did you give a try on visualarq? Sounds interesting and way cheaper than both Revit and archicad...

Archicad is the way to go especially for an architectural firm who does small scale projects like residential projects. Archicad is more flexible and with its direct export to sketchup, it makes it easier to collaborate with other software such as lumion whereas revit needs a whole plugin installed just to export to sketchup or lumion. One thing that I wish Archicad did have is the temporary floating dimensions when you select an element and also the family creation side of revit.

@baonguyenvu3117

3 ай бұрын

They have already built the temporary dimensions in ArchiCAD 27

Would like to start using Rivet, Do you have anything on knowing the different elements? Name is Immot

I am Revit user just like you, but i think ArchiCAD better than Revit as you said in the conceptual phase, but in my country Revit more common than ArchiCAD, so i can not go with ArchiCAD

@faresjawad3096

5 жыл бұрын

It's matter of knowledge when people understand the purpose of the IFC , then they can solve any issue , it's like 3dsmax vs sketchup , sketchup is much easier then 3ds max and designed to suite the designers , again u will c some one using 3dsmax and says it's better .

@ardanmp4673

5 жыл бұрын

in my country, archicad is more common than revit but then i got project from different country which they used revit as their main software and i had to learn revit in short time to suit into the team. since that time i used both software and i realize i shoul learn a lot software not only being fanboy of a software since each software has their advantages and disadvantages. Capable using so many software such Archicad, Revit, 3ds Vray/corona/etc, lumion, unreal enginge, etc giving me huge advantages and make me get projects easily.. that was my experience. but maybe others have another perspective about this

Nice

Maybe the best work flow is Rhino(concept)+ Revit(management+documentation)?

I leaned Revit just because the UI is similar across all Autodesk applications which made it way easier to learn, well for me it did.