Not so much agreeing with that golden duo theory, but why does it make less sense for a kid to help his dad than for someone he killed to help him? Even if Afton was abusive towards CC, it still would make more sense for him to help his dad as shadow Freddy than for Cassidy to.

@tksm97

7 ай бұрын

Those were my thoughts as well, when I heard the theory!!

@ToyFreddyGaming1987

7 ай бұрын

If Crying Child was still afraid of the animatronics, perhaps he would want them destroyed so they couldn't hurt him. Or maybe he thought that if the animatronics themselves were destroyed, the kids would be free.

@Exhausted905

3 ай бұрын

I guess it depends on your interpretation of what Shadow Freddy is doing. Is Shadow Freddy luring the animatronics for Afton? Or is Shadow Freddy leading the spirits into a battle against Afton?

Here's a theory of mine about the Shadows (Jaxla Onlo - He/Him) Rather then the Shadows being springlock victims or agony, I think they instead are the embodiments of tragedies of the Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza locations. Shadow Freddy is the embodiment of the missing childrens incident and Shadow Bonnie(If we count the Toys as being haunted) is the embodiment of the kids that were killed in the FNaF 2 location

@JaxlaOnlo

7 ай бұрын

The common issue I see with the Springlock Victims theory or RyeToast's Agony theory is that, if the Shadow animatronics were to be either of them, then why do they resemble a Withered and Toy animatronic respectively? I think it'd make much more sense with them appearing as the kind of animatronic the individual group of kids haunt

@gaminganimators7000

7 ай бұрын

This is what I've been thinking for a while now

@syweb2

7 ай бұрын

Your description of them being embodiments of specific incidents still lines up with how we see Agony creatures manifest, if my understanding is correct, they just aren't the exact same as Ryetoast's ideas for the specific incidents involved.

@JaxlaOnlo

7 ай бұрын

@syweb2 Ok yeah. That makes sense if we're still going the Agony route

(This one has almost nothing to do with the lore, but I’ve still believed this since FNAF 4 HE’s release) Nightmarionne was originally GOING to be named Nightmarionette, but Scott shortened it because he couldn’t fit the full name comfortably on the screen in the extras menu, and the shortened version just stuck. Keep up the good work!

if a part 2 happens - cherushi (she / her) the reason the crying child is so horrified of the animatronics is because he saw the first springlock failure. fazbear entertainment is a company that will avoid disclosing danger at all costs when not legally forced to, yet they still have detailed protocols and warnings with the springlocks as heard in the fnaf3 tapes, and the crying child would have to develop such an extreme irrational fear of the animatronics from *somewhere*, especially when it seems to be directed specifically towards the springlock characters. so my theory / headcanon is that he saw someone being springlocked which gave him the fear of the springlock robots, and fazbear entertainment were forced from then on to provide a certain level of caution with springlock technology.

@ICantRecognizeCelebrities

7 ай бұрын

I like that theory. It might be shaky, but it explains why he likes the main four animatronics while being afraid of the spring lock animatronics specifically. And it makes me wonder if nightmare Fredbear is full of sharp teeth in his mouth and stomach because of the sound the spring locks made when they were activated. To a child with no mechanical know-how, it may have resembled a "crunch"

@wingedapollyon1677

7 ай бұрын

I like this theory a lot, this also recontextualizes the scene where the CC is in the back room with the Fredbear and spring bonnie parts. Since not only would it be terrifying to a child to be locked in a room with scary looking equipment, he's in a room with the mechanisms that killed a person he saw happen before.

Dittophobia makes it pretty obvious the FNAF 4 gameplay is hallucinogen experiments, probably being conducted on CC since we follow him in all of the mini games.

You say that Shadow Freddy helps WIlliam as if it is a fact. I saw the FNAF 3 minigames more as Shadow Freddy trying to show the kids, where William is, kinda like "Hey, the guy that killed you? Yea, he´s over there, where you can deal with him.". He either didnt know that the physical animatronics cant see the save room, or he wanted afton to destroy the animatronics, because he knew that that would "release" their souls from the animatronics for them to attack Afton. Because it would seem weard to me that (in the game´s stories) an animatronic/spirit would help Afton with no mention as to why..

I feel like that Golden Duo theory makes a lot of sense. CC as Shadow Freddy was just helping his dad, somebody he didn't know was trying to do evil.

a funny thing only a few people notice is that burntraps flesh is growing on the endo.

@therandomcommenter6629

7 ай бұрын

In the books both the short stories and the novel trilogy apparently remnant appears to have some healing properties and it's been debated whether or not Afton has some form of healing factor because of it so you could make the case for burnt trap being afton with this

19:45 I don't believe that it is Charlie's spirit that possess the robot body. In the Fourth Closet, Baby says that William is intrigued by Charlie because he hadn't seen anything like her, and wanted to replicate what Henry did. If Book Charlie was a ghost possessing a robot, then that wouldn't make her unique. William experienced lots of ghosts haunting robots, including his daughter who was also in an advanced robot body that could pass as human.

@therandomcommenter6629

7 ай бұрын

Perhaps she's AI perhaps that's what William was talking about I mean everybody says Edwin is a stand-in for Henry so what if fazbear entertainment had two genius founders one harnessing the Supernatural the other using advanced technology

@tinaherr3856

7 ай бұрын

@@therandomcommenter6629 that doesn't really fit in with the world of Silver Eyes. No other robot has that advanced AI. Even Circus Baby wasn't originally fully sapient, until she was possessed by Elizabeth. If Henry could truly make perfect AI, then there would have been *two* consciousnesses in Baby during the Fourth Closet, not just Elizabeth

@therandomcommenter6629

7 ай бұрын

@@tinaherr3856 true but everybody is going bad shit crazy over the mimic and we know how Scott is a sci-fi fan so it's not unbelievable

@tinaherr3856

7 ай бұрын

@@therandomcommenter6629 true, but this is also a series about ghosts and soul metal. So my theory isn't implausible

My little theory/headcanon is that the FNAF 1 crew ended up becoming the Rockstar animatronics. The main evidence is that one unused Faz-Fact in FNAF AR, that states Rockstar Bonnie was constructed using parts from the original Bonnie. Now I doubt that if this was true, that Bonnie would be the only one constructed this way. Another little thing is that they all have 1 risk in Pizzaria Simulator, for seemingly no reason. From what I know, the only other animatronics to have risk are Mr. Hugs, Ned Bear, Music Man and Lefty, which all have reasonable explanations. Mr. Hugs is a vacuum cleaner which if used irresponsibly you could hurt yourself, Ned Bear seems to be poorly built which could lead to a malfunction where someone gets hurt, Music Man has huge symbols in front of him that if you got too close too youd definitely get hurt, and Lefty is possessed by the Puppet. But the Rockstar Animatronics seem to be perfectly well built and unable to seriously harm someone, besides maybe Rockstar Foxy's hook (then again he seems to always be holding his instrument so he may not even be able to attack). So my explanation is that the Missing Kids are still possessing them, and when they get bored decide to cause some chaos. Kinda more of a silly headcanon rather than a theory, but I felt like sharing.

What if one of the reasons why the Glamrocks act like they do because they are like the minic? Each of the show something that typical rockers do. Chica is like how some rockers go crazy with alcohol and drugs with her love of food and trash. Roxy loving herself is like how many like rockers think of themselves as better than others and they are so incredible. Monty is the violent one and is the angry and chaotic rockers. Good old Freddy is like the one who is just nice and happy to be famous. He’s the wholesome one out of the group.

"Look Ma! I'm in a DMuted video!" But for real, I do plan to make a video on how Charlie could be the puppet master, I just haven't had time to write the script because of school. Maybe in like the summer of 2024 I'll start working on mew videos! (Also don't worry you pronounced my username just fine lol)

I’m so happy you reviewed my theory! And I can totally see how Shadow Freddy helping William throws a spanner in the works, unless he’s still loyal to his father? 😳

@therandomcommenter6629

7 ай бұрын

I mean really why wouldn't he be it was his brother who put his head into a glorified hydraulic press not his father and his sister's loyal to his father so I don't see why he wouldn't

Small detail i wanted to say about the mxes or however you spell it: it has particles that turn purple if you look closely. If the original idea of securtiy breach that afton whould return was retconned it whould explain why mxes looks a lott like an afton-like entity. They might have reused the design or something. Funfact: its always called entity instead of mxes.

@anotheryoutubeuser5379

7 ай бұрын

Given what it almost looked like, I’m gonna guess it’s only there to throw us off

My thought with the missing kids/night guards/foxy bros friends is Maybe all the dead kids are their younger siblings. Chica bro’s little sister being suzie, Bonnie bro’s younger brother being jeremy, etc. Then they go by their dead siblings name as a cover while investigating

Some thoughts I had while watching: 13:50 That was probably the intent at the time of the game's creation, but later games have recontextualized it so much, combined with stuff like the Logbook, that at the very least Mike was _one of_ the people to have a FNaF 4-like experience. 14:35 CC has no way of having heard the FNaF 1 phone calls before this, which you can hear during the main gameplay. Do his dreams time travel? 15:55 Something to note is that MXES is just the security nodes/console, while The Entity is repeatedly referred to as an anomaly that hijacks security measures. Even Blue Helpi, who tasks you with _repairing_ the security nodes before you go off and do your thing, refers to it as a bad anomaly. 16:02 His blue cubes fade into purple, and he has similar poses to Glitchtrap/Malhare. 17:52 Nightmare's _button on the main menu_ is labeled Shadow Freddy. None of his actual images are labeled as such. 20:00 From what I understand, the Charlie-bots aren't possessed by the _real_ Charlie, especially since all of their memories are either fabricated or from their own robot existence.

@ZavoyHarwood

7 ай бұрын

Yootooz has officially debunked your thoery they give ownership/rights to scott and they called the entity mxes

If you do this again… Sam (He/Him) William Afton is NOT Vanessa's dad in the games, unless we consider elizibot. It is strange that abby is 1. An anagram of baby 2. Stuffed in a baby lookin’ springlock suit (i know its an ella doll, but its still a clown with red cheeks) 3. Vanessa's actor is NAMED ELIZABETH. thats not a coincidence 4. I know that there is not a lot of evidence for elizabot but there is not much conflicting, except for the fire from fnaf 6 but william maybe survived and the blob did too (possibly) 5. Vanessa is not born by 1993/2000, let alone in her 20s. This evidence should be considered for the game as it may be a (forsaken word coming up) parallel. I am of the belief that Mike Schmitt may somehow be williams son (sorry but WHY WOULD WILLIAM GO TO NEBRASKA FOR A RANDOM CHILD) so in my opinion the evidence is pointing towards the elizabot theory. my bad i thought about this for 5 seconds

another point towards the mxes entity being somehow related to afton is how it behaves. it isnt just doing its job, its actively sinister in how it acts and seems to be enjoying itself

Theory: The VR Sisters are Vanny and Vanni - In Help Wanted 2 we never see Vanny; we see Vanni. Vanni is the digital persona of Vanny; she is the alter ego that Vanessa would become when wearing the bunny suit and when working with Glitchtrap. However, Vanessa is now free of Glitchtrap and what is left is the copy of Vanni still in Vanessa's personal AR/VR network mask. Cassie's father makes the mistake of taking the Vanni mask offered by Mask Bot, instead of sticking to his own mask; a Bonnie Mask. Glitchtrap then infects him. When we "convert" Glitchtrap back into a plush again (the secret ending, after we've physically died) that represents GLitchtrap being packaged into some sort of contained file, who we then hand off to Vanni. Vanni crushes him because Vanni takes over the network and names it after herself. Vanni does this because her physical vessel has left her at the end of Security Breach and so she is securing her place in the pizzaplex's network because she... Wants to help the mimic. The mimic argues with her (disguised as helpi) in Ruin. The Real Gregory and the Real Vanessa are long gone; the rooftop ending in Security Breach literally showed the separation; the moment Vanessa stopped being Vanny, thus leaving the digital version, Vanni, behind at the pizzaplex.

Love hearing all of the fan theories!

If part 2; Burntrap is both the Mimic and Afton

Here's a theory I have: Gregory is actually Micheal Afton's Grandson

05:50-06:33 Thanks for checking out my theory DMuted! And yeah while I suppose it is possible for Steel wool to not have changed the Burntrap room's, upon closer inspection, we actually see that the colours are different. In the Burntrap ending of SB, 2 of the 3 rooms are purple, and one is red, in RUIN however, all 3 are red. I don't think they'd knowingly keep those rooms intact if they bothered to change that detail in the first place, especially considering how the majority of the game is the Locations of SB being in a state of ruin, completely destroyed and left to rot away, so why would they keep those rooms intact, without an actual story/lore reason? But hey, That's- just my 2 cents on expanding on why I think my theory is true. Keep up the good work on the content!

Im trying really hard to figure out how someone would think William has borderline personality disorder. Its like those old theories about William being a pedo. It has no actual evidence and is something scott would never want to make canon. Giving the abusive, psychotic, child murder bpd might not be a good idea.

@margaretconnor5623

7 ай бұрын

Most likely due to feeding into harmful stereotypes of people who have the disorder. Which is why I'm so glad he didn't even entertain the theory and just went "Nope" and moved on, because making out these psycho, child murdering villains as people struggling with real disorders is so harmful to those who actually have the disorders. My sister has BPD and she's an amazing person but often people assume the worst when they learn she has BPD because of those stereotypes of villains having stuff like that. It's also a way to blame William's actions on something other than himself which people often tend to do with villains. Blaming a condition or disorder they headcanon the villain to have. And my sister will tell you, having BPD is not an excuse for bad behavior, but often times, that's exactly what people do. Blame a disorder. "Oh this character isn't really evil, they have this real life condition and that's why they did it, it's because of the mental condition" which just demonizes those who have those conditions as though they can't control their own actions. To me, it feels like the person was definitely either feeding into the horrible stereotypes, or believes them and thinks that it's okay to further the stereotype by making William's actions about BPD rather than him just being evil.

The P&S is parts and service but an acronym

Im 100% down for a fnaf world video, even if it might not suit your usual style, and im sure many others would like to see it too!

I think the situation with fnaf 4 being mikes nightmares is that the crying child originally had the nightmares and then tortured michael with those nightmares between fnaf 1 and 3. Michael cant have been the only person to have the nightmares though. I respect your viewpoint on the theory but just wanted to provide some extra info so it made a bit more sense to you Also in ooftroops long videos of ruin, it was shown that the entity actually has purple pixels as well as blue ones so the glitchtrap code seems to be in there at least I really loved this theory review though and would happily watch more if you made rhem

Ok hear me out, what if the entity is a digital version of glamrock Bonnie, because we know that he is connected with the patpats, which also means he is connected to the pizzaplex mainframe. Then he accessed the mxes computer and learned about the mimic, all while integrating part of himself into the digital security system, becoming more outwardly hostile. Bottom line, glamrock Bonnie’s ai has integrated part of himself into the security system, which means glamrock Bonnie is the entity

@mr.enderman1993

7 ай бұрын

Yeah but… we can deactivate Glamrock Bonnie, then see the Entity later in the game. I guess that would mean that specific version of glamrock bonnie is deactivated though. I like your assumption of blue rabbit = blue rabbit.

What if the Entity isn't apart of MXES? MXES is connected to the VANNI Network because we can see the nodes (assuming MXES is the nodes) and Helpi (with blue eyes, not orange) says the Entity is 'anomalous' and a 'bad entity'

@gaminganimators7000

7 ай бұрын

Gregory says MXES was designed to stop the Mimic but never mentions a rabbit ghost guy. Also, the Entity had purple pixels floating around it and looks very similar to Glitchtrap and has similar body language

@mr.enderman1993

7 ай бұрын

That’s what I’m saying!

@ZavoyHarwood

7 ай бұрын

​​@@mr.enderman1993 Yootooz has officially debunked your thoery they give ownership/rights to scott and they called the entity mxes

@ZavoyHarwood

7 ай бұрын

This aged terribly

Let me defend crying child is shadow freddy theory: so the reason why he might be helping william is first of all: he might not know about the incident, second of all: its his freaking dad, third of all: like the guy said, he might be scared of the animatronics, so makes sense why he would want them destroyed

Crazy theory Gregory is dead in Security breach. Gregory hid inside Glamrock Freddy and suffocated. (Like Alone Together). Glamrock Freddy shorts out because he sees Gregory's ghost. (Because the animatronics are haunted or something). Crazy Theory 2 Could William Afton's soul/spirit/personality gotten split? Mimic and or Glitchtrap ( depending if you consider them the same entity or not) is the killer side and MXES rabbit is the side of him that loves children and wants to protect them from his murder side.

if you do this again here's my theory, cuz i don't have twitter gru(he/him) the reason that we see the phantoms in fnaf 3 is because of the box of animatronic parts that is in the office, this theory is basically an add on the the "toy animatronics are possessed by the mci kids because they use parts from the withereds" theory. 1. We see at least one of every toy animatronics' parts inside of the box in the office (plus foxy's hook i think) which is why we see the phantoms because the souls haven't been freed from the toy animatronics. 2. We can see that in fnaf 3, when an animatronic with a soul inside it is disassembled, their soul comes out, so it's possible the phantoms are just the mci souls presenting themselves as the animatronics

Here's a theory about the books, pacifically the Fazbear Frights and the Tales from the Pizzaplex books and how they are books written in universe for people interested in the urban leagues surrounding Freddy's. We know that Fazbear Entertainment is more than willing to capitalize on the tragedies that had happened with the MCI and the rumors that were created from that, ie the Fazbear Frights horror attraction and the VR game. So they eventually start writing stories but because they don't know what's really going on, they end up making stories that have nothing to do with the game lore as well as making things up. This would explain things like with Frights having Eleanor a character who closely resembles Circus Baby, but for some reason isn't Baby, and it kind of explains why on earth there's a story about fazgoo, a story about a man being pregnant with Springtrap, a story about a girl turning into candy, ect because their stories that the company had paid some random author to make. And with Tales it explains all the inconsistencies between it and SB, like the Mr. Hippo fridge magnet being recalled in the books while in SB its given out as a free prize, how in Ruin Cassie contradicts the story about the daycare attendant's origins where Moon was always evil, being how she said that when she was at the daycare she slept better there then anywhere else, why the Mimic in one of the stories about it, it's body is said to resemble a spider's while in Ruin it obviously looks nothing like that, and so on. But the biggest part of it, is that it explains why Vanny is not in the books as Fazbear Entertainment doesn't know about her and how she's the one who's hacking the animatronics and causing all the other issues so they don't make stories about her.

@jonstrunonbro1169

7 ай бұрын

Sire squawks’ video blew my mind

@justsomerandomperson6506

7 ай бұрын

@jonstrunonbro1169 same

Yeah i figured that the entity was a backup for Afton after the burntrap thing didn't work out. I think he needs someone IRL to help him posess an endo. Otherwise what's the point of vanny and gregory

@L.P.INDUSTRIES_ROBOTICS

7 ай бұрын

Though the entity has possesed the cupcake in the bakery level most likely it can posses any blank endo wich could mean that when we "deactivate" the entity most likely he just moved to another place like an endo

i have a theory!! Can-Can, She/her There is a high likely hood that Mangle, IE toy foxy or whatever you call them, was intended by Fazbear entertainment to be female. the main reasons for this is the time period she likely was designed, IE between 1986, and1987. a Company like Fazbear entertainment wouldnt make a male character pink, because most children would immediately assume girls. i also would like to say that if a group of children ripped apart Mangle with as much ease as their believed to have, it would show that fazbear cut costs or rushed her. which may show the intent had been to do a more accurate foxy, but that fell through and ended up with Mangle as we know her, or the toys were just built terribly.

@canadaw.e6461

7 ай бұрын

i wrote this before someone submitted the theory involving the lipstick am happy this will likely bolster their theory though!

I have a theory that Phantom Bonnie exists, but isn’t in F.N.A.F.3 because he’s too green, and the horror attraction is also green, and DaveCrap looks similar to him too. So he works at an antique shop, and makes two cents a week.

O Hey I love your videos You continue fnaf theory And I love Entertain the fnaf lore

Okay, I don't know where else to put this. It's probably just a coincidence, but whatever. So you know how Withered Chica is all like "I was the first! I have seen everything!" Or whatever in UCN? Welp, in Help Wanted 2 (which I know came out after this video) during that Princess Quest part the first gravestone you have to light just happens to be the one next to the Chica memory plush. I'm too lazy to double check or anything, but maybe they're confirming the exact order of the children who died? Don't know if that bit of information would be useful, though.

I don’t like people calling the blob the tangle. The tangle is already a fnaf character, being a mangle recolor from fnaf world

I have a theory that the Tales books and Security Breach games are telling the same story but in different perspectives. Here's my evidence and thought process: Eleanor from Fazbear Frights is referenced in Lally's games meaning Tales is canon to Frights and Security Breach happens in the books but with lots of differences. We all basically agree to an extent that Frights is primarily just to provide hints as well as to pave the way for the future of FNAF and that everything isn't 1 for 1 in the games. To me this implies that the Tales books aren't telling the exact same story as the games either but rather are instead telling the same story with the events that follow the Frights version of FNAF. So if we really have to follow the books we should only take the books as fact and reference the events of the games, *not the points or timeline*. Think of it this way, the Tales books are focused on primarily the Mimic while the games up until Ruin were focused on Glitchtrap which evolved separate from the Mimic code from HW with William's agony/spirit taking over it. This seems like common knowledge now but what I propose is that the events in Tales/Frights happened in the games but replacing the in game events with the book (Frights) versions of them and don't relate to the game characters. For instance: William's agony being spread to all the Fazbear Entertainment property in the warehouse in the Frights version parallels the Mimic code spreading throughout Fazbear Entertainment then being taken over by Glitchtrap. The Mimic Endo being taken to the Pizzaplex by the workers is the book version of Fazbear Entertainment not only using the animatronics for code but literally using everything in the FNAF franchise to make the Pizzaplex. What do you think, and please be respect and constructive 🙃

14:10 I can remember it wrong, but didn't mike draw Nightmare/Nightmare Freadbear in Survival Logbook?

Thank you for taking my theory into consideration! I do wanna to elaborate on why I propose Henery faked his death in order to look for Puppet. We know he built Robo-Charlie out grief for his dead daughter, so it is not out of the realm of possibility that he could make more human-like robots with realistic blood if he so chose to, but Charlie is not a typical robot. She was made during his grieving to be as close to the real thing as possible, and when did Henry die in terms of the story? When Robo-Charlie was still "young" as her aunt picks her up from school to tell her the news and to get her things. Henry never saw RC "grow up," but the aunt did. She could have known the entire time about Robo-Charlie, and went about continuing Henry's work in honor of his memory. Even in her own grief, I doubt she got a chance to closely examine the body before it was taken away, since she was taking care of RC at the time. The reason why I think Henry faked his death is so noone would come after him, and he could search for his actual daughter in relative peace. The aunt never got to help this robotic girl with a human mind live the life that was literally made for her, because Circus Baby/Adult Robo-Charlie killed her, then RC killed both herself and Circus Baby while Henry was on the search for a possessed Puppet, never even knowing that Afton was right back where the trail of Charlie's death started.

@randomfandommania3511

7 ай бұрын

Not to mention, the animatronics are already possessed by the time Robo-Charlie goes to the old place with her friends. That could not have happened without Puppet "giving gifts to give life" beforehand.

Don't know if youll see this but I'd love to hear your thoughts on this Midnight motorist is about Cassidy orange guy is her abusive alcholic father. He's banned from Jr's cause of his alcoholism. The person watching TV is her mom who knows the father abuses Cassidy. Freddy's is Cassidy safe/happy place the only place where she doesn't have to worry about anything. She often runs away. Afton being an owner of freedys would know and take notice of this. And pick her as one of his victims figering no one would miss her. So he slowly built up her trust as spring bonnie. Till he shows up at her window one night. She willingly goes with her hence the foot prints. She is then killed at fredys. This I feel explains why Cassidy is so much angrier at afton then the others. He took everything she had he tainted the one place she ever felt safe in and on top ofvthat when she thought she made a friend he killed her. I'm the one you shouldn't of killed. Cause friends don't kill each other. Yes I know the child in this one was said to be a boy but this was way before Cassidy gender was ever hinted at and if we can forgive the save him from fnaf 2 we can reasonably overlook this to. The only thing I can't explain is the dirt mound a grave doesn't make sense and a twisted animatronic makes less sense so I'm stumped

A old theory I use to believe was Sammy Emily (Charlie's twin brother from the books) was Golden Freddy

9:33 if I’m correct his saying that Mimic was broken apart by Edwin and the body of the Mimic and given a head was repaired and the other parts which is the Mimic head was used to make Glamrock Freddy who is the real Mimic

If you do a part 2 i have a theory (this theory is assuming stitchline is in the same continuity) what if Cassidy and Andrew where both in UCN Cassidy as the vengeful spirit (the softer little girl voice) and Andrew as TOYSNHK (hence why the animatronics say he) and Cassidy leaves after talking to OMC (his dialogue being about leaving afton to Andrew) and the ending of golden freddy twitching is Cassidy moving on

I have a theory about the Daycare Attendant's origins, and since I have no Twitter account, I'll just put it here: My theory is that the Daycare Attendant was possibly made (or designed) by Edwin. My only solid piece of evidence of this is the fact they share the same style of teeth as the Mimic does (I don't think they're a mimic though). Aside from that, they do seem older than the Glamrocks do. They're a bit more on the drab side in terms of color, and don't have as sleek and modern of a design as the Glamrocks. They also sound more..."steampunk" while the others sound more futuristic, meaning they either have older mechanisms, or are made with entirely different ones. Their design also feels not very "fazbear-like," if that makes sense. It doesn't really match the same aesthetic as the other characters in the series, and they have a lot more detail in their face than other animatronics have in the past. If they weren't made/designed by Edwin, my other guess is they may be either outsourced or were obtained by Fazbear Ent. buying out another company. Maybe something to do with those old spare mascot costumes in the "basement?"

(Rae, She/Her) I enjoy the theory that Eclipse was the original Daycare Attendant, but, due to a glitch, was split into Sun and Moon and Fazbear Entertainment saw fit to profit off of it. Is it canon? No. Is it fun to think about? Yeah.

I'll put my random theory here for the sake of it. The Henry in Pizzaria Simulator is a robot. Evidence: -All other versions of Henry in other canons are dead before the story reaches a conclusion -Fire is one of the worse ways to die, unless he shoots himself after hes done talking i highly doubt he'd want to burn unless, of course, he has remnant in him. -it solves the need for a robot person in the story which the books keep doing. -Henry seems to die in Fnaf world though thats heavily debatable -it makes a "yang" to Afton Just something thats been bouncing in my head.

A theory I found long ago and still believe is that the different names of security guards throughout the games are “fake” names. You play as Michael throughout a majority series. The only game you don’t play as him is FNaF 2 where you play as Jeremy, who is most likely the bite of ‘87 victim after being moved over to the day shift. I’ve also seen a theory that you are also playing as Michael in FNaF 4 in the gameplay sections because he’s dreaming himself as a child. This is most likely confirmed by the Survival Handbook as Michael is the one who owns it. The mini-games of FNaF 4 is telling a different story of Michael’s younger brother, the crying child. I don’t really intend on being in a video, these are just my thoughts and theories I’ve seen. Also, a timeline I have seen of the events is FNaF 4 (Minigames) > FNaF 2 > FNaF 1 > FNaF SL > FNaF 3 > FNaF 6 > UCN > POTENTIALLY Fazbear Frights (still debatable on its canon) > Tales from The Pizzaplex > Help Wanted > Security Breach > Ruin. It’s a theorized timeline, but I think it works for the most part.

14:11 Magician Toy's page, end of discussion

Now I want Nigtmare to be dressed like Death from Puss in Boots.

I believe that Mimic lured Cassie into his lair because he wants her body. he wants to hide inside her body. Mimic is known to be able to compress and mend his endoskeleton at will. I think he wants to use Cassie's body as a disguise and get a grab on Gregory. he even hints to that goal by dressing like Gregory.

Here’s a theory, by me Ryan (he/him) What if the Toy Animatronics are possessed. Just like Withered Freddy, Mangle’s one eye has the black void with the white dot. Toy Chica also gains these eyes when her beak is lost, and Toy Freddy also dose this. The “Save Them” minigame could be the missing children of 1987, because we see Withered Bonnie, Mangle, and Withered Golden Freddy as 8-bit sprits. Also we see 5 dead kids and 6 blood spots. There are 6 Toy Animatronics, including JJ. JJ hides under the desk and the 6th blood spot is under a table.

I always wondered if Cassie and Elizabeth were supposed to be connected somehow? Similarities between them: Both have fathers that are obsessed with Bonnie Cassie is said to like Carrot cake relating to bunnies Both Cassie and Elizabeth wear makeup that represents a animatronic they savior Cassie has flowers at the bottom of her shirt, Elizabeth is seen having a flower drawing in her room Both Cassie and Elizabeth wear pink and blue (Cassies could be like a reddish pink) Fathers that worked in Fazbear entertainment (or just with Freddy in general) Differences between them: Elizabeth and Cassie look completely different from hair to skin Different personalities Ones (somewhat) alive the others not I don't believe there the same person but its odd how similar they are to one another.. i'll update sm of this later on

@therandomcommenter6629

7 ай бұрын

Since apparently something called carnival is coming at some point maybe Elizabeth is gonna try and to be beautiful Cassie wouldn't surprise me

What if shadow Freddy was attempting to show the animatronics where purple guy was lmao

(Mr. Enderman(Cal))I am so glad you liked my theory!!! Thank you so much for using it as the THUMBNAIL too!!!!!! I got this idea from watching an ooftroop video that showed and explained burntrap/The Entity's animations and design details (kzread.info/dash/bejne/gWx7r7mdgs3KnJs.html). Watching it, it made a lot of sense to think that the Entity was the same as GlitchTrap/BurnTrap. Let me know if you wanna talk about it more!

@mr.enderman1993

7 ай бұрын

@@zavoywilliams3313 Him being blue could mean that he isn’t literally him, but the purple particle effects (and the color purple being EVERYWHERE in the vanni network) could mean that he is heavily related to William. If the Entity (or MXES) isn’t a version of GlitchTrap or BurnTrap, then why do they look and act so similar? Also, Gregory said that “the MXES security program was designed to keep it hidden” if it was just AI, I doubt that it would act this malicious and try to kill Cassie. Maybe it was designed from the base something else, like GlitchTrap (even if GlitchTrap was a version of the mimic).

@mr.enderman1993

7 ай бұрын

@@zavoywilliams3313 Sorry I meant to acknowledge the security nodes point. That does support that MXES and the Entity are one in the same, but Gregory says that “it’s been stuck down there a really long time,” (He’s referring to the mimic). If the mimic was stuck for a long time, that would mean that MXES was there for a long time, which would also mean that MXES and the vanni network might have existed during security breach… I don’t agree with you, but I see what you’re saying. Also, I know that most colors in FNaF aren’t very strong on their own, but purple specifically is almost always associated with Afton. We see it all over BurnTrap, the vanni network, and the princess quest virus monster thingy. That’s why I made that connection.

@ZavoyHarwood

7 ай бұрын

​@@mr.enderman1993 Im back (and no offence) its been confirmed i was right . Mxes is a security program (mxes) aka ai .

Remember when phantom Freddy was being argued if he is Freddy or the gold boy ?why not be both since the phantoms aren’t necessarily real so whoever the guard was though golden Freddy and Freddy are one in the same that’s why he sees them combined in one illusion since phantom Freddy has elements from both Freddy and golden design(granted ‘there are still many problems with this but I still had to say it out)

Here's a little hypothesis I have... (Red - Any Pronouns) I personally believe Fnaf World is being used as a basis for the newer Fnaf lore. An endoskeleton with yellow eyes and weirdly long arms? (Mimic and Mendo). Lolbit making an appearance in the new Clickteam project. UCN had Tangle, White Rabbit, and Bouncepot on the desk, which is the Blob (it's called Tangle in the files and does have a Mangle head), Vanny, and Burntrap respectively. Bouncepot is Burntrap due to the way Burntrap grew onto the Mimic (if you look at his model there's no way he just was drooped on that thing, HE GREW ON IT). The protagonist having to fight mind controled allies to save them (A New Challenger Approaching, Vanny) Having to go into a virtual world in order to get to places you logically shouldn't be able to, like walking through walls (the AR mask and the Flipside) I'm not saying that this is 100% one to one, I'm just saying if we look at Fnaf World we might just get an idea where we're going.

That last one made no sense 💀

I thibo Mike's friend with the Redd mask is Jeremy the guard and putting on the Freddy head, as well qs neing harder to breath giv3s hin flashbacks of his mask

@Cherushi_i

7 ай бұрын

what

@SomeonesBestFriend11_SBF

7 ай бұрын

I shouldn't have typed tyhat comment on my phone@@Cherushi_i What I meant was Jeremy Fitzgerald (FNAF 2 guard) was the Freddy Bully and having to wear the Freddy head gave him flashbacks of his old mask and just like Mike, he feels extreme guilt for literally killing a kid, not to mention his best friend's little brother

I'M MR BONNIE YEAR, OH GOD

Fnaf I think William afton and mimic Both inside a glitchtrap

Tbh being a fan for as long as I have, I’m really disappointed seeing what’s become of this series. I miss when it was just “who caused the bite of 87?” But now it’s this whole thing about book characters and mimics or whatever.

Black foot ferret

So in help wanted Glitchtrap He said Always come back Believe william

It also the boy He's gregory

my personal theory is that Security breach isn't real. The pizzaplex (or at least the one we the player know) doesn't actually exist, just like how the FNAF bedroom and the original pizzarias don't exist. at least, they don't exist in this canon. basically what I'm saying that Security breach is basically a level/game recreation in a VR world like Help Wanted. piggybacking off of one of the commentors in this video, the idea that once you get infected by the glitchtrap/mimic VR virus it stays with you permanently, so the entirety of the pizzaplex is just a VR simulation "game" in the same vein as how FNAF 1-6 are just games created by Fazbear Entertainment to sidestep the "rumors" of its history. it would explain the inconsistencies with the ambiguity of the multiple endings. the burntrap ending DID happen, but it also DIDNT. It explains vanessa Vanny already having immediate access to the AR world through the mask, walking through walls and shit, and how Cassie eventually gets that same power. Gregory and Vannessa never escaped the Pizzaplex because they cannot leave the VR world, but whatever happened in the real world is what caused the state of RUIN. it explains the discrepancy between the Mimic and Burntrap. Gregory meeting burntrap (the vr world) and "defeating" him and freeing vanessa is why the mimic (the real world) is still sealed behind the concrete and the princess quest game is destroyed. I'm kind of a bit all over the place here, and i might be missing some things so let me know what you think, for anyone reading this that is lol

18:54 who profile picture is that?

I have a spread sheet of theories if you want them

NO WAY REAL DAVID BARON?!?!11 23:28

21:29 jeremy

Fnaf hw 2 So in the candy caddy story I believe that the Which is william afton And young woman Be vanessa

@Cartoon-r9s

6 ай бұрын

I have the theory so the candy caddy story I believe that the which is william afton and young women be vanessa

lol

This isn’t a theory, but I was wondering how u think the story would’ve gone if after ucn they stuck with remnant as the focus

@Swankmann

7 ай бұрын

Also I’m working on a project which is basically just Pokémon x Fnaf, and I plan on having it where the main game has Pokémon based on characters 1-6c, then a dlc which is Fanverse characters, then a legends game based on security breach

We don't really know CC was williams and to counter you even more we literally have immortal and the restless

@dmuted

7 ай бұрын

Counter that, the kid was obviously Drac's in that show (which I already don't consider good evidence)

@zgmfx-09a

7 ай бұрын

​@@dmuted first of all HIS NAME IS VLAD‼️second of all I do think CC is williams, but apart from michael and elizabeth calling william father, and henry calling charlie daughter we have no explicit confirmations of any other familial relationship. Oh and third of all as far as your take on the fnaf4 nightmares, considering Alone Together cant it be both of them? Cc dreamt it while he was alive then projected those dreams onto mike

Fnaf hw 2 Basically And the two endings vanny kill glitchtrap Because vanessa want to get revenge on glitchtrap A k A william afton too kill kids

The people believe william afton He's glitchtrap The others is mimic

Context for 18:55? lol

@dmuted

7 ай бұрын

Blackfootferret is a KZreadr who's gotten into some shit lately because of his outrageous theories involving mental disorders like DID and BPD. So I didn't want to introduce that to my channel

@margaretconnor5623

7 ай бұрын

And it's really harmful to people who actually have DID or BPD to put those disorders onto evil characters as it furthers harmful stereotypes that people who have those disorders are bad people. My sister has BPD and making villains out to have mental disorders and illnesses like that is why people assume the worst when they learn she has it even though she's an amazing person who wouldn't hurt anyone.

Crackpot theory: Susie didn't haunt Chica, she haunted Freddy. Literally my only evidence is the fact is that Chica's eyes are magenta, while Susie's eyes blue. Freddy is the only og cast member that has blue eyes. We know that an animatronic's eyes change color when possessed, so it makes no sense that Chica's eyes would be magenta instead of blue eyes Yes I know the whole dog thing strongly ties Chica to Susie, this has just always bothered me. It's a small detail that throws me off so much

16:55 That tweet you saw was a misunderstanding. I was thinking about something else but I was wrong. Just letting you know.

The mimic found william's body Inside the pizza placed mimic bring william back He found a thicker board Become glitchtrap