Remote ID Delayed - What Is Your Strategy in the Meantime?

A look at the interim from September 2023 to March 2024, the new deadline for Remote ID compliance.

Пікірлер: 6

  • @odinata
    @odinata10 ай бұрын

    Love the 47 seconds of you getting up to speed while we look at your Jorgy Jorgenson walrus muoustache.

  • @paolabueso
    @paolabueso9 ай бұрын

    Wow! You have an amazing voice! I think you’d be a fantastic audiobook narrator. Thank you for sharing this! 🙌🙌🙌

  • @HighlandHippie

    @HighlandHippie

    9 ай бұрын

    Thank you so much for the nice response. Glad you enjoyed the presentation.

  • @svennolino
    @svennolino10 ай бұрын

    I hope it will not come to the EU. Good no one is talking about it over here. We do have to register our drones, but the number has just to be on the drone as a sticker. Have a nice weekend! On Sunday i will go to Hamburg to the area of the port where the ship Beijing can bei visited. The ship had been for ages in New York. Best greetings Sven

  • @anonymoussoulFPV
    @anonymoussoulFPV10 ай бұрын

    Is the entire drone community suffering from Stockholm Syndrome? In the United States, no one has a right, especially a government agency, whether in public or not, to force a citizen to wave their constitutionally protected rights (1st, 4th, 5th, 6th Amendments) and submit to, without probable cause and/ or a 4th Amendment warrant, government tracking, surveillance, and control of a citizens private movements while enjoying a business or hobby, all while collecting and recording evidence that can, and will be used against a citizen in any FAA prosecution against them. And, in most cases, forcing a citizen to pay for the surveillance equipment that will be used against them. How is remote ID not a blatant violation of the Bill of Rights? Can the FAA force a citizen to forfeit their constitutionally protected rights in order to fly a drone? Can the FAA supersede the US Constitution? If so, under what authority? Fly safe, fly free!

  • @ghettogardens1

    @ghettogardens1

    10 ай бұрын

    "When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.