Reliability Growth: Crow AMSAA Model with Application Case Study
Dear All, we are happy to release our 76th video on Crow AMSAA Model for Reliability Grwoth. We recommend viewers to watch the following videos before watching this video for better experience:
(1) Homogeneous Poisson Process (HPP) and Nonhomgeneous Poisson Process (NHPP): • Homogeneous and Nonhom...
(2) Reliability Growth Concepts and Duane Model with Illustration: • Reliability Growth: Co...
We welcome your feedback!
Пікірлер: 18
Great job. I've subscribed. Informative and quick to the point.
@uhemant1
4 ай бұрын
Thank you! My pleasure!🎉
Good afternoon sir Nice lecture. With Regards
@instituteofqualityandrelia7902
Жыл бұрын
Welcome. Good to know you liked it!
Thank you Sir
@instituteofqualityandrelia7902
Жыл бұрын
Welcome!
What is the relationship between the Crow AMSAA Model and the Weibull distribution? I've read that the Crow-AMSAA distribution is equivalent to the Weibull Intensity Function. You said in this video that it is represented by the Power law distribution.
@instituteofqualityandrelia7902
Ай бұрын
All growth models are power law and NHPP. Weibull distribution is applicable to a non-repairable item with a particular failure mode. The intensity function looks like Weibull but is not Weibull distribution.
How can i use this model/calculation for semiconductor product where we have increased num of samples/hardware with time and progressively with different firmwares, reliability improves ?
@uhemant1
Жыл бұрын
I believe you can use the same procedure.
@uditpvyas
Жыл бұрын
@@uhemant1thanks. for an example with Firmware1 with 100 samples for 1 day test duration i got 4 failures then i switched to Firmware 2 and added additional 100 samples , With test duration of 2 days i got 3 failure in these 200 samples. so Genset1 will be Firmware1 and Genset2 will be Firmware2. but all 100 samples will show 1 day duration and 200 samples in firmware 2 will show 2 days test duration. It will not like above example with variable test duraiton right ?
How to do calculation when i have 4 system in place and there is no failure reported at all??
@instituteofqualityandrelia7902
Жыл бұрын
During development, it is nearly impossible that there will be no failure. In such a case, the growth model will not apply. Gowth means reliability improvement. If there are no failures, no question of growth.
Why in some cases there is a time in the column even when genset did not fail?
@instituteofqualityandrelia7902
Ай бұрын
Hello Fernando, Thanks for your interest. There are two gensets. So the time is time column shows data when any of the genset fails. Hope this is clear.
@FernandoFerrariFernandes
Ай бұрын
Yes I got it. When performing this analysis using Minitab the results are different. Also, how this Eta and Beta relates to shape and scale parameters informed when using Minitab?
Why you sum de hours information of genset 1 and genset 2?
@uhemant1
Жыл бұрын
Because calculation of failure intensity requires total hours.