great video! very easy to digest. thank you

Unbelievable, your information is much better than books I read! Thanks so much

@SoloRenegade

3 ай бұрын

too bad much of the info is incorrect or inaccurate.

Great job explaining the thrust component of the winglet!

Nice video clearly explained. Thanks.

That video/explanation was the best yet😅 the bit I didn't expect was the winglet can produce thrust, many thanks to the Author 💙 love the way you explain things, might stop watching now and let that knowledge sink in 🛩️ lol

Excellent video. Greatly appreciated. If you have time; how about an IFR cross country planning video with the a cx-3 flight computer.

The video was jampacked with cool info.

I like the glasses

legend

Both (1) vortex drag and (2) viscous drag associated with increased AOA (plus drag penalty due to the lift vector deviating from the vertical axis) are components of induced drag. The way you describe it, you make it sound like they're the exact same thing. They're not. Also: both (1) airfoil profile and AOA and (2) pressure exchange around the wingtips (vortex generation) contribute to downwash - but these are also two separate things!

@CraigLandsberg-lk1ep

4 ай бұрын

What you said just helped me clear up my understanding, and confirmed things I suspected😅 cheers man

Have any videos on landing gear? Especially the folding kind...

@sachinkumar064

3 жыл бұрын

I think, you meant *retractable* *landing* *gear*

@PilotEffect

3 жыл бұрын

No sorry, nothing yet.

@BigDickMark

Жыл бұрын

@@sachinkumar064 Very pretentious Sachin

wing tim explanation wrong too !

It's the suction force produced by the airfoil to make it fly....not any drag. Vortex is the result of lift creation by the airfoil. No vortex means no pressure difference and NO lift. The mystery of lift has been solved... Google Tekemon.

over the last 2 years i dound out that almost nobody besides delta fighter designers knows anything about low aspect ratio wings! so everyone repeats the same half truths and generalizes the same rules which are actually only valid for long wings from AR 6 and upwards! and the spitfire didn,t have ellipticals for anything else than a misconception of half truths and how they get guns into the wing roots...kkk but thanks, a good general main stream overview... and no, wing twist Adoes nit reduce drag , it balances stall! nothing else...

Ah, you are contributing to the misinformation. Induced drag depends on 2 things only: how much lift the wing is creating and how much the air is perturbed by the wing in order to create that lift. Usually how much lift is created depends on the weight of the aircraft, so less weight results directly in less induced drag. Perturbed air left behind the aircraft is lost energy, so less perturbed air means less induced drag. Longer wings and higher speed means the wings are acting on a larger quantity of air, the air is perturbed less, less energy lost in the wake, meaning less induced drag. In conclusion, less weight, longer span, and higher speeds are all contributors to less induced drag.

@user-bc5nm8nq1v

6 ай бұрын

Hi. Why longer wings and high velocity perturbes less air

@CraigLandsberg-lk1ep

4 ай бұрын

​@@user-bc5nm8nq1vhis earlier videos explain this, I watched them in order lol so I sort of get it... just 😅

sorry, but ground effect does jot reduce downwash! bcs then the lift factor would not increase but decrease, pls learn your stuff! the vortices are reduced and the "upwash" on the tips is reduced! so your explantion should be wrong! did you read all that just off from a book? then buy some better ones! but as long as people still inssist that drag due to tip vortices becomes stronger the slower a plane flies you might be xcused, seemingly 99% do not understand aerodynamics at all but just read formulae the wrong way....bcs if vortices become stronger the slower a plane flys, then they mist have become indefinitely endlessly strong at standstill, whixh is impossible...case closed, i am off...