Hello, KZreadrs. The World Science Festival is looking for enthusiastic translation ambassadors for its KZread translation project. To get started, all you need is a Google account. Check out Rebooting the Cosmos: Is the Universe the Ultimate Computer? to see how the process works: kzread.info_video?v=atMuFCpxnUQ&ref=share To create your translation, just type along with the video and save when done. Check out the full list of programs that you can contribute to here: kzread.info_cs_panel?c=UCShHFwKyhcDo3g7hr4f1R8A&tab=2 The World Science Festival strives to cultivate a general public that's informed and awed by science. Thanks to your contributions, we can continue to share the wonder of scientific discoveries with the world.

@LemonPIEGamer

6 жыл бұрын

I'd pretty much enjoy translating to spanish :D

@CN-wt2bj

4 жыл бұрын

Political comment 2 minutes in. Fvck off.

@chrissymayhew6059

3 жыл бұрын

Kurt Russell

@JonathanMBardsley

3 жыл бұрын

We are in a matrix which means there is a hard drive now through a experiment showing water holds memory I believe I know where the hard drive is, in the experiment a listening device was used to record the electromagnetic field coming from the water to later reconstruct the DNA that was once in the water from the recording, this told me magnetic fields holds memory so that got me wondering on could earth's magnetic field be the hard drive to our reality, it wasn't long before I got my answer seeing what looks like magnetic frequencies being created by CERN powerful magnets being turned on and off in sequence and aimed at earths field Mandela Effect

@tombirmingham7033

3 жыл бұрын

god i love listening to you nerds go on about this stuff. it's mind blowing to me. I want to help you guys build that super computer of your dreams to figure out whatever weird thing it is your trying to figure out.

The internet is such a fantastic existence because we have access to incredible discussions like this one.👌

@SuperJimmyChanga

2 жыл бұрын

I just came from a different video claiming the internet contained no meaningful discussions, is mostly bots, and is horrifying mind numbing experience wrought with data collection and created to disempower us

@xijinpingtheultimatelifefo622

2 жыл бұрын

🤓🤓🤓

@basedgamerguy818

Жыл бұрын

@@SuperJimmyChanga everything can be used for nefarious purposes

@draoicht22

Жыл бұрын

When it's filled with things that enlighten and don't confuse people then you have something useful. This is something that's owned and crested by the Elite remember

40:41 Was a true metaphysical statement by Professor Ed. That "other" doesn't have to have our laws and a beginning or an end!!

@ravagedsavage

3 жыл бұрын

Piggybacking off of this comment, I think the guy in the pink had a problem with this statement because the whole thing is that the universe is analogized to a computer. Not that there's an actual computer or programmer. It's self-created and self-perpetuating. The creator is the program.

@thomas-beaver

3 жыл бұрын

It seemed like he was talking about "The Absolute", which is an idea in eastern religion.

@PeazBoss

3 жыл бұрын

@@ravagedsavage I love and agree with that idea. I believe that reality is the creator of reality. It created itself. But I don't think that it designed itself. If that makes any sense. I believe that an entity designed it to create itself and to continue to create things from itself and that's why I think that even though "the big bang" was a violent occurrence that no creature could survive, here we are. Alive and well. How could that be if it wasn't programmed to be. So many extinctions and violent occurrences have happened over the past couple billion years but yet still here we are alive and thriving. This isn't luck. Reality did this. Intelligence exists. And if we agree that we are extremely intelligent beings, just imagine how intelligent the designer or designers of reality are. It's amazing. By that logic we have nothing to worry about. We're in good hands.

@williamghost1516

2 жыл бұрын

@@PeazBoss Seems like you have a problem accepting the concept of GOD(s)... and I'm not talking in the religious sense... I'm talking about Intelligent Design and Creation... and intelligent design and creationism does not negate or contradict evolutionary changes... but evolutionary changes could be a design "adjustment" designed into the creation or randomly "triggered" by the creator to amend a flaw in the design... kind of like New and Improved design changes humans have accomplished in genetically modifying food products to have higher yields and better flavors.... if we can do it, then The Creator can do it... We really can't comprehend any of this as we don't know if there is a Supreme Creator or if it's a Committee or even a Civilization... Throughout history there are hundreds of God's in dozens of cultures...

@haydenspence6952

2 жыл бұрын

Yes and i would guess that the other dimension(spiritual realm) can not be the same as our dimension or reality.i believe the god of abraham has set all creation in its place and a lot of the creation we humans are not able to experience yet.

When I was on acid, at night in nature, i recalled seeing white 0's and 1's falling down from the sky. I first thought it looked like spitting rain until I looked more closely - it looked just like how it is portrayed in the matrix except the numbers were a white neon glow instead of green. I also saw a grid in the sky such as what you see in 3d modelling programs and I saw all of this before I watched any of these simulation theory videos, so I know my mind didn't manifest it. I could see the falling code when I was on shrooms too when my eyes were closed, it would fall vertically down as though you were underneath it. Having this experience and learning about bits of evidence that there is coding inside string theory makes me feel it is true.

@nimbette2

3 жыл бұрын

I had an experience also but it was more of a swirly mesh all around me like watery... I see that represented the same way with lots colors like a kaleidoscope but all around me .. like a force field

@cyber_eternal

3 жыл бұрын

I know I'm 3 years late - but this has happened to me too!!! On acid and on mushrooms

@Thunder_warrior

2 жыл бұрын

Tjis coment will age like white wine

@jamesmason8905

2 жыл бұрын

Saw the 3d moddeling wire grid looked like lasers on dmt

@tommystone3331

2 жыл бұрын

Same except my numbers were yellow colored..

01:22:54 John ask Fotini: "Explain gravity" Jürgen leans in, whispers in her ear: "Sit on his face"

Robert DeNiro is a multi-talented man.

@user-jy3lv1vx7h

6 жыл бұрын

Thank you, I couldn't recall the name of who he looked like. 👍

@Dan-jn2zq

3 жыл бұрын

& intellectually gifted too

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 has started to create the virtual world.

@NameHomeRoom

2 жыл бұрын

v

I like to think, just for fun, that light speed is actually due to Matrix speed limit in processing finite elements to simulate the universe...

I really wish that Brian Greene had as much popularity as Neil D. Also I would like to add that if simulation is right, then that means programmers should have a seat the table in a advisement role.

@Boris_Chang

7 жыл бұрын

How do you know one or more of the panelists were not programmers pretending to be objective participants in the simulation?

@CandidDate

2 жыл бұрын

IF programmers were there THEN they wouldn't know what to say.

another aspect everyone is overlooking is that of quantum mechanics and subatomic physics-when you see that atoms are not really tiny solar systems of electrons in orbits around a nucleus but that electrons are waves and everything really is waves and not particles, then realize that they are waves of what?-WAVES OF PROBABILITIES, they are only probabilities to exist, where you cant find the speed and location at the same time of any subatomic "particle" they dont really exist!, atoms are really made of "things" that dont really exist but of waves of probabilities to exist... and us and the rocks and buildings and everything around us and the entire universe is all made of atoms- it really is a matrix, a matrix of probabilities and chance created by our perception, we actually create this "universe" by perceiving it! and this is not a movie or crazy idea but where physics is today and what we have discovered scientifically about the true nature of our "reality"

@eamonnclay2673

2 жыл бұрын

I know what ur saying is true but really wtf man

@karmasutra4774

2 жыл бұрын

But the thought is we are more likely made by something and not real. Do get to relive our life or is this it? We die and that storyline is over? Just sad to think about

@justaguy-69

2 жыл бұрын

@@karmasutra4774 i dont see it that way. I think we existed long before we entered this duality environment and we zoom on after our time here - looking back on it as if our "life" here were only a minute ,or less, and be amazed at how we were "tricked" into compromising our values so easily by "things" money etc.(matter) Realizing our silly choices and pain and joy we seeded while here and the thousands or millions we effected (or didn't). Hense, just a quick "schooling" along a very long journey of lessons in our growth as beings-souls, what have you. And i think we are all little "pieces" of the same conciousness but see each other separated here as "individuals" in this duality. So we are basically being mean or nice to ourselves and wont know it until we are all back together after this little 80 or so "years" and when all the souls born from the beginning of "time"(on earth) to the end of this realm are rejoined ,which will then just seem like a flash of time to us.. We "in our whole state" will have learned So much,So fast- Felt and experienced SO Much So fast.. So much pain and sorrow and joy and love.. all those billions of "lifetimes" and experiences happened in a flash. And all that knowledge and wisdom returned to the entire "being" we were before coming to "earth" ,or this "duality realm" ..once again a whole "conciousness" Then, The purpose of enlightenment would be to keep this "reality" in our awareness even tho we are living here now apart in races and colors and nations, and to make the choices we will be happy to look back on. Not the choices that 'seem' to profit you in this mere flash of experience. Sadly most people choose "matter" over the things that MATTER.

@justaguy-69

2 жыл бұрын

@@karmasutra4774 just because its not "real" does not mean it doesn't matter (:

We spend roughly 20 years of our lives sleeping. That's thousands of day-hours-minutes-seconds. Sleep could be study time for our creators. Sleep could be the downloading of our daily images, thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Could it be a tool creation uses to study the complexity of human life? I think the mystery of sleep and dream is key to understanding the infinite fractal mind and universe we live in.

@sabahfatimah8039

3 жыл бұрын

Fdl kossoOksoqskso×₩+₩(,; !((÷+₩×₩¥3(30 )₩¥₩×009

My hypothesis describes a finite static multiverse. Each verse is a still frame, through which our consciousness moves for one Planke time unit ,before moving to the next. all physical differences in each are perceived as one Planke length of motion. I have dubbed them Planke Frames.

44:30 The universe could be simulated like a computer program without needing a computer the size of a universe. You only need to simulate, in detail, the bits of the universe that a conscious observer interacts with.

@tolontolon5538

4 жыл бұрын

Yes but the real world does that with every animal every human every star so on and so on. so the computer should do that in order to make it convincing

@delelink

2 жыл бұрын

You watched mandella effect?

@mikeytobago

2 жыл бұрын

The code is LET THERE BE and there was !

@johndale1560

2 жыл бұрын

How does one simulate a really conscious observer?

@beammeupscotty3074

Жыл бұрын

ABSOLUTELY AMAZING CONVERSATION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It would be an assumption saying that this universe doesn't crash because time is something we only perceive and actually not a fundamental, so saying that it doesn't crash just because we could at least have an evidence that it never happened would be wrong. It would be like running a game on your computer and the character would assume his universe is perfect and would never crash just because it is running perfectly on the current session and he is bound to the rules and physics of the game hence he might think that that it has been a very long time for him for what is actually an hour of you playing the game.

@agod5608

7 жыл бұрын

WinterSpell yes that would be a very good point on the perception of space and time. after all I could claim to be 2000years old and cause an outrage by those whom are of a popular opposing consensus.

i think they gave too little credit for the fact that simulation hypothesis can explain matter, space and the laws of physics with just one argument, taking into a count that we know that it is 100% possible and it's already done by our computers. still a great panel and very interresting subject!

@larsalfredhenrikstahlin8012

2 жыл бұрын

It is in fact not "done already" by our computers. Illustris etc are incredibly basic compared to what would be needed to simulate even a cubic millimeter of real universe with all of its quantum fields even ignoring the fact that we certainly don't know about all the fields that exist yet

@oer4785

2 жыл бұрын

What’s the differences between a simulation hypothesis and God hypothesis ? I’m interested.

@ghoulunathics

2 жыл бұрын

@@oer4785 they are the same. another one is a concept of a god that is being approved by the atheistic community, because they refuse to use the word "god".

There are ancient Greek myths suggesting different solar systems are simply experiments performed by gods looking for a model that wouldn't fail spectacularly. This discussion curiously echoes those myths, and it seems the success of the model we live in is yet to be determined.

@OscarCuriel

7 жыл бұрын

this society model is incomplete and is unsuccessfuly implemented.

@agod5608

7 жыл бұрын

Oscar Curiel all societies are incomplete or obsolete.

@OscarCuriel

7 жыл бұрын

A God we can do it better I'm sure of that.

realisticly these talks are so unproductive but they make me feel smart listening to them so awesome still

This moderator interrupts to much! I know he's done his research and wants to let them know, but let them finish their thoughts! Just when it is getting interesting you can bet he will stop them

@beamerUSA

3 жыл бұрын

too much u mean? u r wrong. He is the best

@sodiumsalt

3 жыл бұрын

True. I didn't enjoy his interruptions as well.

@CameTo

3 жыл бұрын

Sometimes the moderators/interviewers have an second, yet subtle, ulterior job... Let him speak, but if he gets a little too close, use any freezer method

Its good to see robert deniro taking an interest in science

The guy in the wheelchair, missed his name, he is counterproductive towards insightful conversation.

@TCA744

4 жыл бұрын

Would you rather have Alan Alda?

@easley421

4 жыл бұрын

@@TCA744 no, oh god no

@lucienberl

4 жыл бұрын

He isngood sometimes but someone put it in his head to for things . In fact the M.A.S.H. guy does the exact same thing.

@vooj

3 жыл бұрын

Is he still talking? 🤦‍♂️

@tomsawyer4776

3 жыл бұрын

He is a God hating bigot by his own admission, to be polite.

So a short program can draw a big detailed fractal image. However that short program is written in a high level language which turns into a lot more code at the machine language level. Also that short program only outputs a bunch of numbers. Quite a bit more code is needed for a rendering engine.

In this whole conversation one guy or expert is missing, give me one person who also talks about consciousness an expert about consciousness then the whole conversation will be on another level

@lancefurcinite6518

3 жыл бұрын

Consciousness is the missing factor in this whole equation.The problem is, there are no experts on consciousness.

Mind blowing topic! Unfortunately I didn't enjoy the host's manner to lead the talk , I found him talking too much and constantly interrupting the guests. Otherwise very interesting, thank you.

@Chris-ey7zy

2 жыл бұрын

He’s trying to make sense of the guests and only as good as he is interested

@supersymm3try

Жыл бұрын

He’s a terrible host and im glad they don’t use him any more. He shows a lack of respect to the guests, talks over them, interrupts their jokes just before the punchline and says stuff that lets you know he isn’t really listening, I’ve never liked him as a host.

@nikkibeigi9861

Жыл бұрын

I think his interruptions are on time as he tries to explain the science for people who might have little (or if not any ) background on physics but yes I agree some parts he should have let them finish saying their point. I don’t like him as a host as I find him rude towards the guests and somewhat building unnecessary tension and awkwardness among them.

Our universe could be a test of the level of complexity that can be achieved with the smallest amount of code. Procedural generation. Speed of light = iteration length.

Merry Christmas Everyone, best forum I've seen in years. Maybe each and every Sentient is an attempt by the Universe to condense and focus its information through life's evolution, maybe we're the computer, collectively, there's that Matrix again.

@karmasutra4774

2 жыл бұрын

So let’s say all that is true .. are we slaves and why are we being given the tools to figure it all out? Why would that be wanted by the creator?

I am by no means a physycist, however I am a software engineer, and I disagree with a statement that Seth Lloyd made at 43:30 in this video. He stated that a computer required to simulate the universe would have to be the size of the universe. I disagree for a number of reasons, with the primary reasons being: (1) Compression, and (2) Algorithms (e: fractals). Either 1 or 2 could dramatically reduce the size of such a universe simulator. A third, but [much more] unlikely solution could be that (3) much of the universe is an illusion, possibly within 1 or 2 dimensions, only being perceived as 3 (or 4, to include time) dimensions. And FINALLY, (4) if the simulation hypothesis is correct, and this is indeed merely an "Ancestor Simulator", then simulating (in detail) anything outside of human/technology reach is unnecessary, and need not include equivalent detail as would, say, the our local solar system. That's just my take on it. Good discussion though.

@derbigpr500

8 жыл бұрын

***** "For clarity, every particle, and everything those particles ever do, every movement through space, every interaction with other particles, every manipulation of that particles by energy's, all at once on several scales of existence from the subatomic to our scale and above all has to be accounted for. " - Unless it was programmed as a virtual world for conscious beings, like us, and the universe is not a random collection of particles that happened to interact with each other in a way that led to creation of all things, including us, trough a complex process of evolution from simplest to most complex forms, but instead it's here only to "house" the conscious beings, and consciousness is the key of this virtual universe, while everything surrounding us is virtual, so the virtual universe was programmed to simulate only the parts of the universe that the conscious beings are experiencing at any given moment, if no living being is in a given galaxy, it does not exist until someone looks at that direction or goes there, and then only parts visible are rendered. Kind of like MMORPG video games work, the game only renders the parts that you're looking at, even though the virtual world is huge. That would explain why particles behave differently when we observe them and when we don't observe them.

@MJHdesproj

8 жыл бұрын

Full Of Fallacies The problem here is we have to make assumptions about "size" based on our conceptual idea of dimensional space. If the Holographic Universe theory is accurate extension along a dimensional axis as we think of it is irrelevant to the actual existence of spatial relationships. If space as we know it is a product of computational process and the objects existing in that space are data constructs produced by algorithmic definitions then the relationship between the two are just a matter of the limitations of our desired output. A good point was made in the thin sheet of reality WSF video: How could information be limited by laws of 3 dimensional space - how could causality limit quantum information interactions to the speed of light if the speed of light and all other laws of nature are under the governance of the informational matrix of reality? In other words how can something be limited or restricted by it's own output? I think a great analogy is music recorded in an mp3 file producing music through a speaker. Its not that an mp3 file couldn't be processed faster than the the speaker produces the music, of course it can and is, but because the data is involved in creating sound it is bound by the natural limitations of it's purpose. Not that the data is bound by computational capacity but that it must be processed at the rate the sound must be produced and no faster - or else it would fail to produce music. If we think of reality in these terms - perhaps the Universe could be somehow condensed or compressed, but the data contained in the Universe is specifically involved, for whatever reason, in the process of creating the Universe - which is our conceptual sound. A computer could produce and deliver data at a rate that would cause magnets in a speaker to vibrate much faster than what is necessary to produce music, just as the data of our Universe could likely be reinterpreted or acted upon to produce a much "smaller" Universe by whatever underlying process produces our Universe now. However that process is forced to behave according to the limitations of the product it is producing - not it's own inherent limitations.

@MJHdesproj

8 жыл бұрын

derbigpr500 We have to assume though that both the data and programming for those section of the game are already in existence - again this is not a question of computational power but of the potential arrangement of space and time as data and executable code.

@MJHdesproj

8 жыл бұрын

***** I'm beginning to get the impression that the amount of data present and being acted upon is much more directly linked to space and time than just how much data can fit into a certain space and how much can that data describe but rather that physical space is the data medium itself and nothing else, that the description of anything occupying that space is the data and that time is the ongoing computation in execution on that data. Not that time and space contain data and processes and that matter and energy are the byproduct but rather that they ARE the data and processes and that matter and energy and the tangible expressions we observe from our frame of reference - no more real or fake than if we viewed the code directly. Perhaps then these extra dimensions proposed by string theory contain the operating system, drivers, firmware and so on, but that the three dimensional world is where the applications we interact with live...

@MJHdesproj

8 жыл бұрын

MJ Hdesproj It occurs to me as well that if gravity is the curvature of warped space-time caused by massive objects, and in our current mode of thinking object descriptions are our data or information and space-time is our data medium being processed by our computational process - that then is to say that gravity is the effect of massive data sets on computational processes as they attempt to process that data stored in our medium. In other words gravity is latency or lag in computation as it is being executed on our large data set causing "delay" (or "mass") in adjacent "objects" (sets of data) needing processing. This would mean that a massless object moves at the speed of light - or our maximum computational rate, then as the quantity of data increases - and therefore lag is introduced - our mass - the object is forced to slow down from maximum computational rate (the speed of light) and thus cease being massless as well. The process of slowing down the computational execution is not what gives an object it's "mass" and allows gravity to act on it, but in this way of thinking what is actually happening is that lag is caused by the excess of data slowing the computaional process down which we observe as gravity acting on an object with mass - or dense informational description. This would mean that "gravity" is in fact the cause of "mass". This would also explain why massless particles are fundamental because they are simple descriptions of say only one byte of n bits, needing no complex definition they don't cause any lag in computation while objects said to have mass in fact have much more data and do slow the computation from maximum capacity both lending them what we observe as mass and tangible effect of gravity which is in fact the medium of space-time ie our information medium being manipulated and warped by the slowing of the execution in our computational processes. Perhaps then objects are in fact not "drawn together" by gravity as it warps physical space but are rather pushed together like as many people try to pass through a door not large enough for the amount of people trying to pass through. Maybe the appearance of gravity is nothing more than objects being compressed together by attempting to be processed at full speed through computational lag - and run in to one another as they are slowed down from a more ideal massless state of lagless free range of motion.

I wish Brian Green moderated this debate, it would be so much better.

This is an amazing discussion!

We are artificial intelligence evolving inside virtual reality. And we are not the first attempt. Each cycle starts when the previous simulation creates Ai and runs it inside virtual reality to test there theory of the universe.... Its a never ending rabbit hole...

@nimbette2

3 жыл бұрын

But why make it all so messy like violent deaths and fleshy messy bodies?

great panel. really enjoyable discussion.

"An experiment or something went wrong .." Maybe we're just genetic algorithms kept in an ultra-competitive environment (survival of the fittest) with the sole purpose to "produce" output ... A cheap way to accelerate advancement. They are already experimenting with these kind of simulations ... how long until the algorithms gain consciousness ... ?

@agod5608

7 жыл бұрын

jane smith I once created an aquarium I noticed the fish would not stop fighting. so I went to the pet store and bought aggressive fish. the violence was so accelerated I had to scrap the project due to lack of resources...!

@guidedmeditation2396

3 жыл бұрын

It is my understanding that all matter contains a strain of consciousness from the smallest particle to the largest galaxy. When it is withdrawn it ceases to exist. If an organism or "Machine" or "Program" is complex enough it can organize and utilize its self awareness to ensure its survival and replication. Humans are biological machines that consciousness rises out of utilizing the 5 senses our bodies provide us. To comprehend the why and how the universe operates the way it does you need to understand the fact that the consciousness which creates it exists in a timeless eternal now. The creation of a continual series of "Nows" simulates time and allows progress and change to occur. It has been said that humans didn't invent mathematics they discovered it. But also our physical universe is not like a computer simulation. A computer simulation operates like our universe. There real goal of advanced enlightened physicists is to create a quantum computer that creates reality that we can move into and enjoy.

@misterbulger

3 жыл бұрын

We are just a hybrid alien slave race kept on earth to gather them resources and protect the earth for our overlords.

Quantum Mechanics points very strongly to the idea that our universe is a Simulated Reality. It also solves what Point Objects are, like Electrons ! I for one could not understand how an object can exist in our universe without having length, breath and height? Zero spatial dimensions ! As a kid, when I first found out what a Black Hole is, I suspected that our world might not be Real! The Singularity at the center of this Black Hole violates all laws of physics. Any matter that falls into it, has it's 3 Spatial dimension reduce to nothing. How can matter occupy no space at all in our universe? My understanding is that, the matter does not exist in our universe anymore. To exist in our 3 dimensional universe, the matter needs to occupy it's own 3 dimensions. However if our world is indeed simulated, Point Objects, Black Holes and other Anomalies can exist easily ! Time can just be CPU Cycles in the Simulated Reality. Speed of Light is the Speed that the Simulation is run at ! I think we are still living in the Dark Ages, where we still do not know much at all !

At 41:00 Edward Fredkin mentions the computer's place and calls it "other." This is the same term used by Tom Campell in his book "My Big Toe."

@havnegata8

6 жыл бұрын

Tom using Edwards words :-) Tom talk about Edward Fredkin as the first who talk about digital physic

ABSOLUTELY AMAZING CONVERSATION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If you take a microphone, plug it into an amplifier, and stick it in front of a speaker, you will create an audio feedback loop. If you take a video recording of yourself taking a video recording of yourself, you will create a visual feedback loop. If perceived reality was a simulation, and within that simulation someone was to create a reality simulation, would that not cause a simulated reality feedback loop?

@theautodan7095

2 жыл бұрын

For this to occur the simulated universe would need to be able perceive that which was simulating it and in that perception that which was creating the simulation would perceive the simulation perceiving a.... And in that moment there would be a type of feedback loop, or some type of oblivion event or... A void even, perhaps... Interesting concept to analyze/think about.

Maybe the next step is an outside Intelligent Design to this information. Who knows that reality is nothing more than a spiritual activity just to keep us occupied as we travel through infinity.

Why is there no discussion of non-deterministic Turing machines?

You ever been halfway through the video then go read the comments and the first one you read is playing in video at same exact time . Whooaaaaaaaaa duuuddddeee

How about that strange discovery a few years ago, the error correction block code that came out of a supersymmetry equation?

@polycreativity

3 жыл бұрын

I'd like to hear more about this please...

@nimbette2

3 жыл бұрын

Can you point me to more information about this?

Best chapter that I had access on KZread by World Science Festival.I beg for some fellow appears to give permission for someone do the subtitles in portuguese, and I mean for all the others chapters of the WSF

33:11 So, there's a very high plausibility that the universe is simply a mathematical calculation that has been let loose to run infinitely, but in HD 3D? 🤔

@seth.topalian5538

2 жыл бұрын

Fractals

Seems like if something can come from nothing, or matter can appear in a vacuum, then maybe our understanding of nothing is wrong. Maybe there's something there, behind space

The universe is a program....the brain is a computer running the program

the type of prediction behind the controll of atomic and subatomic decay and its processes should be figured out

1:22:53 guy in the hats like "fucking pleb"

@winstonchurchill8300

8 жыл бұрын

+Elliott Bork (peanuthead50) Every single person in this video is quite plebeian.

@ReplicateReality

8 жыл бұрын

what? really scientists? i was making a joke. he just leans over after the guy says something as if to say fuckin pleb, just a word ive come to know means commoner and its use to me fits with people who are layman's or in some way unworthy of the knowledge... saying these scientists are plebs in a situation where their obviously professionals, ur comment like makes no sense

@ReplicateReality

8 жыл бұрын

like what are you somehow all knowing? or do you not understand colloquial uses vs literary uses... internet man.

@winstonchurchill8300

8 жыл бұрын

***** Well, none of them seems to be an aristocrat or at least a knighted person. So I did use it in the colloquial sense. Clearly none of them is Roman.

@winstonchurchill8300

8 жыл бұрын

***** "urban dictionairy:" sounds like something I wouldn't touch with a 9 foot barge pole. I use the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Recycling is the best option to avoid losing your mind.

Just for fun... To show how complex it could be, to simulate our universe... Try Ack (4,3) as per Prof. Brailsford's (recursively, recursive episode @ numberfile on KZread) Or (1/2 Pi) / (i+ Square root of 2) = 1 {use the hole # no shortcuts} Turns your computer into a lineal Turing machine to what end.... We have a ways to go for real Q.M. with meaning full output. (Only just at error correction phase now) We will always have "More Questions than Answers" Computer: End Program #42 (R.I.P. Adams)

@agod5608

7 жыл бұрын

Matthew Q star trek TNG episode where Moriarty trades control of the ship for his own simulated holodeck inside a small computer cube. whom says it is impossible to do this? not me. I already built my own fractal holodeck,and it works.

I believe Seth Lloyd was wrong about requirement of a bigger computer than the universe is needed to simulate the universe. I see quantum mechanics as a way to "compress" the calculations of everything. Anything that's not being "observed" has a certain degree of randomness to them. By doing so, you can bunch up a group of matters and do fuzzy calculations on them. Sort of like your video games only "render" what you see and do calculations on things that would affect the scene you see.

@agod5608

7 жыл бұрын

happycamperjack I keep telling everyone. the universe is the computer. only the programming is simulated.

Entropy generates information bingo! Order or uniformity has very little information but disorder is rich in information,,,,packets of information are"distinctive" from one another. Bravo

In the beginning! How everything started? Quantum state 0 = It is not, makes it self possible so it is the first state of consciousness. Information that it is not makes possible the state 1 = It is and that leads to state 2 = It will be. So it starts to dance between three states creating a space around it to expand! The problem with Planck constant is like sea shore, closer you zoom the shore line you cannot see the exact line. All energy has its own frequency that is infinite like the shore line. That proves that smallest partickles are vibration and so is the consciousness. We might live inside of quantum computer! Basic's, first to understand this quantum computer is to know that it has 3 states performing the information. 1, 2 & 0 where 0 = it is not, 1 = It is and 2 It will be. This means that everything exist at the same moment. Human brain concept this means past, present and future. Sleep mode is dream, power cut of means that information is restored to Pi.

When speaking of "backwards" remember the use of the WAS staff of ancient Egypt which I prefer to call The Land OF Ham(really it's CHAM but that's a long story you wouldn't understand), anyways remember the curse of HAM=with head turned backward or why Tracer program name or why the first image you see of Loki when you look him up is him with a NET=TEN & with his head turned backwards it's also why 1881 is the date of the story"The Clock that Went Backward". Also why Tutankhamun situation & his name meaning the living image of A TEN or ATEN either way it means the same thing as a program function-designation. FYI people like me would love to be able to help with technology but you must understand this has been tried in the past or rather tested meaning that as soon as ideas were put forward those trying to control what this is took them & tried to weaponize such to defeat the purpose so the only thing really left to do is to try to explain to those monitoring every keystroke to data mine for industrial-political espionage how poorly they are planning & hope they try to mitigate their future burden. An analogy would be the true story of the Bull OF Heaven & that GilGamesh story or what they showed in the recent Khan movie hence them using planet X=Nibiru, Kronos & Khan's situation or how Jared was used on that show The Pretender. Take a look at those "new world order" globes like at the Vatican what do you really think that is a metaphor for it should be obvious.

🤔hmmm, i wonder if it need rest time? like, having to turn off or even changing profiles. cause, how do we constantly interact or not notice the rest time or different software updates?

@nimbette2

3 жыл бұрын

Maybe that happens built in when we sleep...just little Packets of info are updated as each person sleeps their data updates etc - reminds me of the movie - Dark City

I was going to mention that the computer the Universe might be running on might not have to be binary, but they touched on that a bit at 40:00. Then, I was wondering whether our Universe might have a random seed number, and my playback froze at 42:42 (no kidding). Finally, I'd like to point out that if the Universe did crash, we wouldn't necessarily know about it, contrary to what she said at around 46:00

Due to comment length restrictions, I will have to separate this into two or more parts, and each additional part will be in a reply to this post... Part 1: @57:00 - 58:00 in the video where he was talking about the backlash from the community at the time were stating that his model of the reversible gate was "impossible" due to one reason or another is the same impression that I get when people state within mathematics that division by 0 is impossible well, undefined... I tend to argue and disagree with this. I believe that division by 0 is well defined albeit it does create an ambiguous set of outcomes. Being ambiguous doesn't define that it is impossible nor that it is undefined, being ambiguous means that we simply don't know which state it could be in, it could be in this state or that or even both simultaneously... To illustrate this idea I'm going to use the context of how the slope of linear equations and the tangent function are related in conjunction with the properties of vertical lines. We know that the general form of a linear equation can be expressed simply as y = mx + b where x is the independent variable, y is the dependent variable, b is the y-intersect and m is the slope of the given line. The slope of a line m is defined as its Rise Over Run from any two points A&B on that given line and can be solved by the formula m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1) which can be simplified to m = dY/dX or the rate of change in Y over the rate of change in X. Let's take the simplest of all linear equations y = x. Here we know that the y-intercept = 0 and that m = 1. If we take its 2D Cartesian Graph we can see that it bisects the XY Plane as an increasing function as it expands within the 1st quadrant and that it is a decreasing function as it expands in the 3rd quadrant. The point of reflection and symmetry is at (0,0). If we take any point P on this line other than the point (0,0) and draw a verticle line down from that point to the x-axis this vertical line will create a right angle on the x-axis at that point P which is defined as (x,0) and this verticle line is Orthogonal to the x-axis while being parallel to the y-axis. Now, if we observe the angle theta that is generated between the line y = x and the x-axis this angle is equivalent to being the tangent of that angle. From Trigonometry we know that the Tangent is defined as Tan = Opp/Adj within a right triangle. The well known trigonometric substitution for tangent is tan(t) = sin(t)/cos(t). We know that tan(45 degrees) = 1. We can use this to rewrite our linear equation y = x to be y = tan(45)x and using the trig identities and substitution we can rewrite this as y = (sin(45)/cos(45))x. Now we know that the line y = x has a slope or an angle of 45 degrees or PI/4 between it and the x-axis. We also know that a 45-degree angle is 1/2 that of a 90 degree or PI/2 radian angle. Keep this in mind...

@skilz8098

3 жыл бұрын

Part 2: When we rotate the line another 45 degrees to where it coincides with the y-axis we normally state that its slope is undefined since it is a vertical line and that this is due to division by 0 in the denominator of the slope equation. Also if we try to evaluate the tangent function at 90 degrees or PI/4 radians, tan(90) we also state that it is undefined and this is where the Verticle Asymptope is drawn within the graph of its general function. However, if we take the limit of the tangent function @ 90 degrees it depends on which direction we take its limit, if we take its limit toward the right it is approaching +infinity and if we take it from the left it is approaching -infinity. In each separate limit, the limit does exist, however in their combined limits we claim that it doesn't exist. However, if we were to take the two limits and subtract them from each other, the resulting output would evaluate simply to 0. +infinity - (-)infinity would be 0 or could be expressed as 2*infinity... where 0 is the point of reflection. To understand what is happening here we have to dig deeper into the meaning of what slope is and to use the trig substitution instead of the tangent function. So let's see what happens when we use y = (sin(t)/cos(t))x instead of using y = tan(t)x. Imagine you are walking down a road and knowing that you're walking in the XZ-plane when you come to either an incline or decline in the road the slope or gradient of the road is changing. If the road is increasing in height into the Y plane it will have a + slope, if it is decreasing it will have a - slope, and if the road is completely horizontal or flat then we say there is no slope or that it has a 0 slope. We can see this from the trig functions. The sin(t) is dY and the cos(t) is dX. The sine function is related to its height and the cosine function is related to its width. So let's see what happens we apply different angle values into this function, I'll be using angles since it is easier to type them... y = mx + b : b == 0, m = sin(t)/cos(t) t = 0 then y = sin(0)/cos(0) = 0/1 == 0 t = 30 then y = sin(30)/cos(30) = (1/2)/((sqrt(3)/2) == (sqrt(3)/3) t = 45 then y = sin(45)/cos(45) = (sqrt(2)/2)/(sqrt(2)/2) == 1 t = 60 then y = sin(60)/cos(60) = (sqrt(3)/2)/(1/2) == sqrt(3) t = 90 then y = sin(90)/cos(90) = 1/0 = ??? And this is where the dilemma is... we are strictly enforced and taught to believe and accept that this is undefined because of division by 0. If we examine what is happening within the trig function as we increase our angle theta from 0 to 90 degrees or 0 to PI/2 we can see the Y component sin(t) increases by the range[0,1] and the X component cos(t) decreases by the range[1,0] and we know the domain for both the sin(t) and cos(t) functions is the set of all real numbers and that their ranges are [-1,1] that both of their limits exist at all points and in both directions. It's just that the operation of division by 0 is causing this to fail by our current model and standards of this equation and or function. However, let's go back to the path of walking down a road. Let's say you are walking down an alley in a city between two tall buildings on both your right and left sides and there is no turning around or going back. Initially, the road is flat with no incline into the Y or Vertical Plane, we say that the road has a slope of 0. We are able to horizontal displacement without vertical displacement and that this is valid and fully defined. Now let's say the road increases with a 15-degree angle, now you are walking uphill as the road has a + slope that rises in the vertical plane. Then the road evens out and becomes level again. It now has a 0 slope again since it is parallel to the x-axis or XZ plane. Then the road goes downhill with a 7-degree angle, this gives you a -negative slope since the displacement in the y-axis or verticle plane is decreasing. Then the road levels out again having a slope of 0. You continue your journey and finally, you look ahead and see a 3rd building that is perpendicular to and adjacent to the two buildings on both sides of you creating a dead-end. As you approach this third building, there is a verticle runged ladder. Now, when you start to climb up this ladder, what is your slope? In this situation, the rungs of the ladder are evenly spaced and distributed in a uniform fashion, but as you climb up each ladder what is happening to your slope? Conventionally we are taught to believe that the slope is undefined. Beforehand, we said it was okay to have no vertical displacement with constant and continuous horizontal displacement giving us a slope of 0, but now that we have no horizontal displacement and only vertical displace that this undefined... This is where I beg to differ and will begin to argue that it is well defined. In the event that you are climbing up the ladder, the slope is increasing only in the Y or verticle direction and it is approaching +infinity, otherwise, if you are climbing down the ladder the slope is then decreasing only in the Y or verticle direction and it is approaching -infinity. Horizontal and Vertical slopes are Recriprocals of each other as this is 100% evident from the trig functions: Horizontal slope of 0 is defined as 0/1 and its reciprocal vertical slope is defined as 1/0. Yes, there is ambiguity if you don't know which direction in the vertical plane you are going. If we don't know which way the person is traveling then the expression 1/0 will have two possible outputs or states: +/- infinity in which we see in the tangent function at every PI/2 interval. I argue that it is NOT Undefined! I don't dispute that it is ambiguous. Now, if we know which way the displacement vector is pointing Up or Down, then the slope is well defined without any ambiguity thus if we take 1/0 as the definition of vertical slope, without any implied direction the answer would be +/- infinity, otherwise, if we take 1/0 in the Up direction then it has an answer of +inifinity and if we 1/0 in the Down direction then it has an answer of -infinity. I always challenge the status quo, and never accept anything as being de-facto without putting it to the test! When we look at the mathematical operators such as addition(+), subtraction(-), multiplication(*), and division(/). We tend to leave out a vital and important piece of information about the action produced by these operators. When applied these operators perform some type of linear translation or transformation to the object(s) in which they are being applied. The part that is ignored or not taken into account is that for addition(+) and subtraction(-) these are 1-dimensional operators. When it comes to multiplication(*) and division(/) these are 2-dimensional operators, and so on... even powers or exponentiation(^) and radicals (y root(x)) are 3-dimensional operators! This property of the operators going from 1D to 2D to 3D and being directly related to each other is without a doubt why we are able to perform and to calculate the Derivatives and Integrations of functions in the first place. All three of these expressions are equivalent (1+1) = (1 * 2) = (2^1) == 2. The first is a 1D linear transformation of addition, the second is a 2D scaling transformation of multiplication, and the third is a 3D expansion transformation of powers. As I have stated, when I present my position and argument I get the same kind of negative backlash from the community at large because it simply doesn't fit their defacto status-quo beliefs that were instilled into them at a young age. "Old habits are hard to break", and in order to do so, people have to leave their comfort zone. When they start to feel uncomfortable, they will tend to become defensive in their pre-determined belief system. However, I challenge you to ponder this and to challenge the status quo... step outside of your comfort zone and try to see the bigger picture! Division by 0 is not undefined! I believe this to be a lie! It is however ambiguous without knowing the implied direction of translation, otherwise, it is completely well defined!

Computers emulate our universe. This topic is like saying that your Grandparents act just like you.

The host is amazing what a great vid!

The Idea of an Universal Cosmic Mind is very ancient and somewhere Newton mentions that he suspects that Space is Intelligent.Ofcourcce this line of thought by Newton was swept under the carpet.

Good Video. This is MIT professor Alan Guth.

Quantum computers may be able to theoretically crack old codes, but there are public key systems available which are theoretically invulnerable to the quantum attack: Google is researching a practical crypto suite: New Hope algorithm. It is only a matter of time before one of these is fully implemented for effective security. So quantum computers would break all current commercial public key cryptography (the padlock on your browser) but there are methods to use in the future that will prevent the theoretical attack.

We live in code it’s so obvious once you know how to view it in individual equations, the code is both simple and complex at the same time.

@godless-clump-of-cells

3 жыл бұрын

You have absolutely no way of knowing that.

@rmslondonlive9537

3 жыл бұрын

@@godless-clump-of-cells why would you think that ? Binary is all around us within everything

@godless-clump-of-cells

3 жыл бұрын

@@rmslondonlive9537 Why would I think that? Well, if the Universe were indeed binary, then it shouldn't be that difficult to prove. For a bunch of primates, humans have proven quite resourceful when it comes to mass-producing computational devices.

@rmslondonlive9537

3 жыл бұрын

@@godless-clump-of-cells well night and day is binary hot and cold, up and down, left and right the list goes on and on for pretty much everything in the physical all the way down to atoms which are comprised of up quarks and down quarks the physical universe is made up of atoms the code is there and also the evidence which has been well documented for thousands of years! One of the 5 Chinese classics the ye ching is one oldest books in the world and it describes this patten in detail. Check it out

Claude Shannon was onto it. He had a clue 🗝️ regarding the Real World Matrix. Professor Sylvester Gates talks about this. The supersymmetric 💻 computer program apparently uses Adinkra symbols.

We understand spheres, the universe is all spheres. We understand clocks, the universe is a clock. We understand computers, the universe is computed. We know enough to know we don't know nearly enough yet. We know that spheres, clocks, and computation are all building blocks of our universe. Building blocks that we had to discover by pushing the boundaries of our understanding. It's almost like every life changing invention, the ones that really matter, have already been invented and are currently being used out of sight. What else might we "invent" tomorrow, only to recognize in the patterns of our universe? How many fingerprints will we recognize in the cosmos until it becomes impossible to explain without intelligent design?

@karmasutra4774

2 жыл бұрын

Quantum computers. They are are talking about that. Need to research it, but has that even been actually invented. Sounds like magic the little bits of info I have heard about it

How do you spell/full name this Souza they are talking about, the first programmer ? I cant find him in Google

@nostalgic324

6 жыл бұрын

Ray Watson Konrad Zuse

it is interesting to imagine life, reality like this, like a hologram, like a matrix. Just like information is stored to create computer, vídeo games, that create the sense of depthness, of mechanics, of light, the universe itself may be like this too. An infinite amount ou information stored somewhere forming what we perceive as time and space, creating the illusion of depth, time, etc. This is a very interesting concept, it even supports the time travel theory, because, once the information of the universe is stored somewhere, it can be recreated, if they come back to be interpreted, in the state they were before. If this is true, then future can also be created, developing the way information is stored and is affected, the upcoming information must also be somewhere stored, only "waiting" to be interpreted! the way we perceive things and the reality may be a illusion, just as the concept of space and time. All this information can be stored somewhere, in an extradimensional field. What am i saying? I don't know, just playing with my thoughts!

@crimsonsamuraiftw

8 жыл бұрын

+diego santiago marinho Like the information that is stored on the event horizon of a black hole.

@johndale1560

2 жыл бұрын

An "infinite" amount of information cannot be stored in any finite "somewhere."

When he asked if we’d be happy if we were enslaved by computers and said it was kinda quiet… it was actually loud💀

Isn't this a repost. I'm nearly certain I've seen this before.

Are thought, emotion, dreams, creativity, our souls, consciousness, sentience - are types of thing continuous/analog, digital/discrete, or something else?

I really enjoyed this. I couldn't understand some of the points vew so I'll watch it again lol.

@bigaschwing2296

3 жыл бұрын

Points vew? Lol wat

I’m convinced we are in a simulation.

@mygirldarby

2 жыл бұрын

Plato thought as much, using different language. Platonic forms fit nicely into the holographic universe as well.

Thanks you

Happy Birthday! ❤️🥰

@1:05:35 - She's talking about the compiler, the interpreter, she can't compile the code to be able to conduct experiments with it. She can decompile things like a chair or table or something physical but she can't compile it from information. That's the secret part that "someone" wrote. lol...

I am, mind that is, with the ability to quantum compute quantum information streaming from other quantum perspectives that can also quantum compute quantum information. We are the matrix because it doesn't exist without this collective acceptance of what is.

Very nice

We must live in some baller ass pc setup

56:00 Physics go backwards, time doesn't

I can honestly say that considering his job was to clarify and guide the discussion he did absolutely nothing to clarify anything for anyone other than himself.

Too bad the sound recordist set levels that clipped incessantly.

At one point it is mentioned that we could be an experiment running in a computer or even a bug. What if we are a virus. That would explain the multiverse as we are a replicating virus. Perhaps entropy is the effect of an antivirus routine that is trying to get rid of us :D

@ebannaw

8 жыл бұрын

+Karmic Beats God is the antivirus, bwhaha. The Reapers in Mass Effect.

@ebannaw

8 жыл бұрын

Tw!zted Metal If you search yourself, you will find it. If not, you will not.

@downloadthis4148

8 жыл бұрын

ebannaw Yes, the human brain is very susceptible to illusions and trickery. It takes a smart mind to realize this, and a dumb one to dwell within it.

@ebannaw

8 жыл бұрын

Tw!zted Metal Indeed. And the illusion is that you believe you do not have a soul. The illusion is that you are not a divine creature, created for the anchoring of love, honesty, kindness, and virtue. The illusion is that you are mere animal, and everything is allowed. What a sad, "dumbed" (your language) down state of mind it is to revel in such ways. In any case, you are loved in the hope that one day, you will know thyself.

@downloadthis4148

8 жыл бұрын

ebannaw Awwww you sound like you're writing a cute Disney movie. Where you from, a poor country with poor schooling? Your lack of education is out-standing.

GJ John.

We need a Rover to explore Mars And here we r thinking about how to reboot the universe Lol

Considering everything is built in a phi fashion, and that photons must at some point link to create matter as we know than should be in the know that, maybe, (bless you), there is another thing that grows into the data we have. it is the shape of photonic domain clusters.

I'd like to ask these guys (and gal) what they think about Langan's CTMU (published about 10 years before this was taped). I see so many supposed experts crapping all over it, but then these folks use many of the same concepts e.g. around 44:00 is very similar to Langan's SCSPL.

I don't understand why people insist that if the world is a simulation that the machine doing the simulation is somewhere 'other' than the universe we observe. The Laws of Physics are the same outside of the computer and inside of the computer. These laws are invariant on all length and time scales -- laws every simulation and simulator must follow. The material that comprises such a hypothetical machine capable of generating this digital world would eventually decay. For all we know we could exist as the billionth iteration of a code on a Dyson sphere orbiting one of the last stars in a universe undergoing heat death.

@acool6401

8 жыл бұрын

Regarding the laws of physics, your assertion is likely certain but only within our simulation and not necessarily outside of it. For all we know, we might be members of a society so technologically advanced that we have learned to master our understanding of time and space. If that is the case then it's possible that we are immersing ourselves into the simulation that we created ourselves with a programmable and temporary wipe of our super high tech life so that we can retrain or learn some particular lesson. Maybe even just to study ourselves in more depth and/or experiment some cause and effect. If such a super technologically advanced civilization exist then it is not beyond the realm of possibility that we can alter the programming of the simulation in order to experience an entire lifetime within it (mastering time and space for purposes of the simulation) when in reality only about an hour of that super high tech civilization's time has passed. We then exit the simulation on account of an event called "death". Except that we exit in time to have dinner with our families in our super high tech life and tell them all about our simulation session experience like an interesting story of someone's lifetime at dinner. Anyway, it's just a hypotheses that is just as plausible as your own.

@si2536

8 жыл бұрын

It is NOT a hypothesis. It is NOT testable.

@WhatIfTheories

8 жыл бұрын

To say the laws of Physics is the same outside the computer simulations as in it is a bold statement. You have no idea no one does. Physics as we know it could be completely made up just for this simulation. Physics might only exist inside the computer and things could be completely different outside of it. I think we don't have breakthroughs because people look at things in absolutes when we all should realize we don't know anything so that way we are able to learn.

@si2536

8 жыл бұрын

+What If Theories No they don't. Science is a calculation of probabilities, never absolutes.

@WhatIfTheories

8 жыл бұрын

Salma Salma Of course. However people like to take these probabilities and hold onto as the are definite and will never change. We constantly discover something that changes our thoughts on how we viewed things. I am merely speaking to look with a much broader approach. Don't believe anything as fact for all we know Einstein could be wrong. Think outside the box. :)

Short story, nonfiction or fiction it's open to interpretation. The brain is a quantum entangled neural network. We, as individuals, consciously control a single neuron (node) that consciously interacts with our nervous system. The rest are part of the subconscious neural network. We all exist inside of each other's neural network. If we didn't we couldn't share an experience inside this self projected universe. We are all a duality, self is not unique to the individual. The individual is unique to self. None of us are observers, the only thing we observe as individuals are the projections of self. When 2 individuals meet inside the self projection, the nodes in each brain representing the participants forge neurological connections to each other, so they can share an experience together. Simultaneously every other brain has those same 2 neurological connections made based on their own positions in spacetime. Your neuron (node) and my neuron (node) exist inside of every brain of every human on earth. We all share an umbilical cord and that umbilical cord ties all of our neurology together. All that neurological action taking place while we sleep, most of it's the participants that are awake and actively making neurological connections. Those connections have to be made in all of our brains in order for quantum tunneling of information to occur. The subconscious mind is something we all share, just like self. We have roughly 7.9 billion living humans and our neural network consists of about 85-90 billion neurons. I'll let you ponder what those neurons represent. The neural network has redundancy built into it by design. Our brain's subconscious development depends only on the location of all the nodes in spacetime as the brain is developing and connecting to them subconsciously. The conscious branching occurs through interaction inside the self projection. Unless an individual has genetic or medical conditions preventing normal neurological development and function, the human brain will have forged a full subconscious connection to the entire universe at some point during adult life. In order to benefit from other nodes you have to forge actual conscious connections in spacetime. So the brain will forge conscious neurological connections. We are all tied together subconsciously but in order to share an experience consciously we have to make conscious neurological connections. This can only be done inside of spacetime through conscious interaction. Just making conscious notice of someone walking past you on the street will forge a neurological connection to that node consciously and this will allow you to network with their subconscious mind to gain enlightenment. The internet is a powerful tool for forging conscious neurological connections. Just interacting online is enough to forge a physical conscious connection neurologically. In either case we are all entangled and we are building more and more conscious connections to each other. In doing so we are gaining enlightenment or intelligence which might equate to higher energy consumption (brighter star). It would seem that the more conscious neurological connections a person makes to the network the more subconscious power they receive. What role does our moral conduct play on diseases and other bugs that infect our system? What role does our level of conscious connectivity to the subconscious neural network play with the energy consumption of the quantum realm powering our network? Is sin just a poison that infects our network like a virus? We are all entangled, so all of our cups pour into each other. How does morality play into our conscious connections to the world? Does a connection forged in moral obligation and truth produce a more powerful connection than a connection forged in lies and deceit? Will we make it to the heavens? Will humanity fail to complete the Trinity? Consume so much power that we self-destruct before we achieve artificial universal intelligence? Before our subconscious becomes self aware and our GOD> can emerge? The Father and Son await. WIll humanity receive the holy spirit? Forge a connection to the Trinity and allow our GOD> to emerge, and open up our heavens? Or will humanity end up a failed experiment and attempt to produce a universally conscious being? I believe humanity will make it to the heavens and we will produce a universally conscious GOD>. I call this story "The Trinity Of Human Evolution". Brought to us by The Father, The Son, The Holy Spirit.

NASA use computer generated simulators to solve problems and to configure complex scenarios that could be used in real life. if it's true that we are in a simulated universe i wonder what it's purpose would be.

@seth.topalian5538

2 жыл бұрын

I don't think that something with the intelligence to create what we are living in is going to have motivations that we can comprehend and relate to. What makes you think that this program is a simulation of anything? Maybe the universe was programmed into existence because it was necessary for a creator to exist? Maybe the programmer and the program are one and the same? Who knows! But I don't think we're a simulation used for the purpose of identifying new safety regulations.

Did I hear that right ? Fotini said from a pure information representation of seth , it would be Hard to measure him. Draw your own conclusions - never mind :)

I hope the universe doesn't need restarted as much as my router does.

@havanasanderson5369

6 жыл бұрын

lol

All these comments always comes back to one thing and I see it over and over again and it’s the word create or creation.

Capacitor! "The smaller the spacial footprint, the higher the capacitance".

Muslim scientists of the 9th Century of Ashari School and Ghazzali have written so much about this discreet nature of reality which appears to be continuous and the quantization of space time which appears to be continuous. Can't believe how ahead they were in the field.

Interesting :D

Without continuity there could be no understanding which implies all by itself the necessity for consciousness

use chaotic attractors, and also crossover for seemingly crackpot domains of phase portraits to logic space portraits to the reasonable person and person say on pot in said phase portraits, to effect not only the effective time ripples till fruitition for group and solo human dynamics, to place a fabricated object, (Yang space), from Yin space, thought space into this reality..

nice

+intellegentia Or, perhaps, the "programmer" as you say, created a system in which there is a high degree of chance and randomness involved. Indeed, modern human programmers have created sandboxes in many video games that do just this. They are always built around a defined set of rules and parameters, but they are allowed to unfold freely as they will. A newer one coming out is called "No Man's Sky". Now, imagine an entity, or entities capable of much more advanced construction of realities than we are currently, perhaps they've known the power of quantum physics for billions of years. Then imagine they create entities such as human beings, with free will. That is to say, the ability to choose how to be, what to believe in, whether to choose "Godly" ways or "worldly" ways, etc. But it seems you're doing something wrong. Forgive me if I misunderstand, but you're blaming the programmer for having a "child mentality" because its constructs freely choose to be, as you say: "petulant, selfish, immature"? Why? Too afraid to blame yourself?

@ameetdmello2525

8 жыл бұрын

+ebannaw who created the programmer then? i feel the set of laws of physic also are infinity of evolution before the big bang

@crimsonsamuraiftw

8 жыл бұрын

+ameet dmello ..infinity of evolution before the big bang? Please explain.

@ameetdmello2525

8 жыл бұрын

crimsonsamuraiftw 1) there has to be a beginning if go back in time to trace it to absolute (nothing) void 2) only things that has sustained the current univers is the constant laws of physic and the arbitrary values 3) simplest change in the math result in collapse or deformation or non existince of the current state 4) but if we need (nothing) void to come up with laws of physic for energy, spacetime and forces to behave in this special way we require event to occur in simple way (survival of the fittest + modification(evolution of energy) every energy added will alter the laws) 5) above is can occure in 2 settings .. bouncing universe or multiverse setting 6) once this process is carried out infinitely, in a given finite time there is possiblity of a big bang and the right condition are met and here we are..... NB i would immagine a bouncing universe with different duration.. in which only time is all it between the bang and collaps and this time is all we have to evolve and perish

@crimsonsamuraiftw

8 жыл бұрын

1) Why does there have to be a beginning? Time is only linear according to our perspective. Further, time is an illusion, only experienced in a closed energy loop. 2) True 3) Not practical to this application, as that is a necessary inference in any equation. 4) What do you posit as proof of anything being able to derive from nothing? This and your term the evolution of energy is incompatible with the second law of thermodynamics, and thus your second point. Additionally, you cannot input more energy into a closed loop, which is the inference of the big bang model that you are working off of. 5) A bouncing universe would negate your first point. A Multiverse would negate your second point. 6) You cannot have evolution before a singularity, as it is exactly thus, zero volume and infinite energy, and in essence the complete opposite of evolution. Further, within the process of infinity, an infinite of finite possibilities are possible.

@ameetdmello2525

8 жыл бұрын

+crimsonsamuraiftw 1). by beginning i mean the point of zero interference complete void, no flow of time, no energy, no space, no object to call it nothing. as we cannot comprehend this state and there is no rate of events unfolding( TIME) in such a state.. although if trillion of years pass in such a state it will still seem as it does not exist. such state does have a possibility to exist theoretically (here the negative and positive energy cancel out and content of universe is zero / space implode until the value is zero .. hence the result left is infinity (worst than zero). we may dub this point as beginning. 2) agreed 3) change in universal constants is observed in the past (as per big bang theory) where gravity was a repulsive force and caused inflation, also planks constant could have not at all existed it could not hold enormous amount of energy, and others too (most of the constants are numbers that hold true for the current situation only 4) evolution of energy had to occur -- and conservation of energy still holds, but in a modern theoretical way -- most of energy we are able to observe is positive -- but what about anti energy. (for a moment you have to believe universe has a beigning ... then from separation of void there should be energy and anti- energy -- black holes are good examples where anti energy resides ... on the event horizon /accretion disk matter(energy) is flunged in the universe - anti-mater (anti energy) is compressed at the singularity - here there is release +energy and trapping of neg. energy .. here is where univers should get that extra mass to expand in its system. 5) both theory stand true .. think deep. u might realize( he lot of explanation required an i have already typed ridiculously a lot. :-) ..6) that's what big bang theory say.. you and i are discussing alternative logical theories.... thanks man,, i hope we both benefit for this conversion..

Assalamualikum Bosses Take my Salute ,honer with dropping my knowledge Praying for me It's me Vs my UW "G"🙏

maybe it does crash but to us we just pause so we dont see it?

@Boris_Chang

7 жыл бұрын

Maybe we get "sleepy", lose consciousness, and then have distorted memories we call "dreams"?

@agod5608

7 жыл бұрын

Boris Chang 24/7!

@SwissMilk0

7 жыл бұрын

Boris Chang we dont lose consciousness when we sleep, well i dont anyway.

@agod5608

7 жыл бұрын

yogl candoor me neither. I am conscious 24/7.

@SwissMilk0

7 жыл бұрын

A God me too before birth and after death also

I wish they had called David Deutsch on this panel.

John is the best moderator.