This has been such an informative series. Thanks for the concise recap.

Katie Mack is an amazing scientist and science communicator!

Thanks. But music was intrusive

@prasadrao2895

9 ай бұрын

I agree. I hope PI sees the comment and removes the music.

Wow, thank you so much! Wonderful series

Being a regular pool player, I can concur, it's impossible to recreate a shot with all its spin and momentum exactly, there's always a tiny, almost quantum, difference. I like it 😁🎱❤

@dukeallen432

2 ай бұрын

Quantum not reason for your poor play.

@toastycrystaleclxpse3423

Ай бұрын

​@@dukeallen432 because of quantum I got into a car accident

Excellent! Thank you.

Uncertainty explanation is awesome 🎉

Thank you.

Very nice.

Thank you

I got more attached to the music than the theory.

thank you, i feel less stupid now.

Yes, the observer is the observed. Pretty profound. Notions of acceptance/rejection, like/dislike, me/you still form the structures of society. It’s understandable, who would have thought that the fundamental foundation of what holds this all together is- uncertainty? Perhaps one day, our political and economic systems can utilize such logic. Waves of economic strength and waves of policy execution. Always in movement, always in the direction of unconditional freedom.

@schmetterling4477

6 күн бұрын

Why are you telling us that you weren't paying attention in school? ;-)

There are many of these HUP videos on KZread. I cited four in a paper in Annals of Physics 2020, of which I still like this Sixty Symbols video best, kzread.info/dash/bejne/iKt729ODfbPTpqg.html (the time-frequency analysis is the most accessible, but this takes us a little into the more general applicability of Fourier analysis.) If we think about Fourier transforms of probability distributions, that gives us Hilbert spaces, noncommutativity, and a Generalized Probability Theory (we used to talk about GPTs until everybody else started talking about ChatGPT), all in a classically natural way. You also need Planck's constant, which brings in special relativity, but that can also be done in a classically natural way. The physics literature has now made classical and quantum much closer to each other than even ten years ago. You can see my KZread channel for how I think that currently plays out.

@schmetterling4477

6 күн бұрын

You are thinking about it all the wrong way. None of these mathematical statements tell you anything about physics.

SAX GOIN HARD BBY HE GOT SKILL

What about Non-Demolition Measurements though?

@schmetterling4477

6 күн бұрын

No such thing. That's just another misnomer by the quantum mystic crowd.

The computational nanotechnology inside my body is doing this to me. What is it? Quantum Mechanics.

do we have to relearn sciences yall

While I love this series and the host's way of interpreting everything complex phenomena into what can be easily understood, I'm afraid she probably miscued uncertainty principle when she explained it in terms of light affecting our measurement. That's the observer effect, not the uncertainty principle. Uncertainty in measurement is fundamental and intrinsic, rather than being an external influence. It's not that we "don't know how to measure things", it's that "universe does not allow measurement by nature."

@schmetterling4477

6 күн бұрын

Measurement is simply irreversible energy exchange. The uncertainty of a single measurement has nothing to do with the uncertainty principle. One is caused by relativity, the other is a trivial mathematical lemma about certain types of linear operators that applies as well to the theory of acoustic waves as it applies in quantum mechanics. All of you are highly confused about these trivial matters.

@Feynman_Fries

6 күн бұрын

@@schmetterling4477 if you ever made a video about measurements and uncertainty principle, you'd do more harm than good with so many jargons.

@schmetterling4477

6 күн бұрын

@@Feynman_Fries Why would I have to make such a video? All of you are already completely confused about these matters. Why? Because none of you ever had to make a precision measurement and you don't know what that takes. :-) This is second year undergrad material, by the way. It's so trivial that we are spending like 15 minutes of a thermodynamics class on it. The only time I was ever asked about it in my career was during an interview. The guy asking was a EE... so even the better engineers know this stuff, even if they are only applying it to electrical measurements, but it's completely general an applies to all measurements. Dude, the DK is very strong in you. :-)

@Feynman_Fries

5 күн бұрын

@@schmetterling4477 you won't make a video about it but you'd go about scavenging on comments made by random people telling them how it's a trivial thing? Is that how you try to make yourself feel important?

@schmetterling4477

5 күн бұрын

@@Feynman_Fries I am simply looking for fools on the internet and then I am making fun of them. It's my hobby. ;-)

God may not play dice but Chuck certainly does 😂. Like and respond if you know the reference 💯

Ask Leonard hofstadter 🤣🤣.