The government should give subsidies on machines and after product Because this system creates a circular economy and also improves waste management And obviously ' oil is better than micro plastic '

@thesunflowchannel1995

Ай бұрын

The problem is it takes more energy than it produces, so your running on a deficit. AKA losing money AKA you have to charge people to get rid of their plastic

@sebastienloyer9471

Ай бұрын

😂 Government is never the solution. People are the remedy

Thanks a lot

¿Podrías explicarme bien cómo sacar los gases impropios, los podridos?

Sweet. I want to learn to do this!!

@Kimberlie-uh9br

Ай бұрын

Me too

Could you explain properly how to remove the improper gases, the rotten ones?

what is the name of program you used?

@earlygamer9106

27 күн бұрын

Limewire 😂

Sir ur vedio is superb but how can we see process pls remove wording on vedio Or put down underv vedio

I would like to know if it would be possible to have everything recirculate into the system to feed itself. It seems like all the systems I see have outputs of combustible gasses, combustible liquids, char of some kind, and pollutants, but I would love to see the whole system be a closed as possible where the combustibles are burned to generate the heat for some of the steps and the exhaust from all the steps get used in either the drying of the feed stock or go through a char filter. Ultimately the output would be a horrible toxic paste but it would have been greatly reduced in volume and broken down as much as possible into simple molecules, therefore could be chemically treated to refine it. I understand wanting to sell byproducts of a pyrolysis system but if the system is open at both input and output, I fail to see how that's better for the planet. I would think that the ideal is to have a net minimal input and a result of waste reduction and transformation. What's the point of outputting elements and importing similar elements from different sources, it's like shipping laundry detergent that is 80% water just so it can be used by a washing machine combined with even more water, just ship the concentrated stuff and get rid of all the complexity of needing to move water around.

what you the catalytic that can we use

@subhamzaalima

Жыл бұрын

What catalyst we can use

@Aniketsingh-py2jj

Жыл бұрын

@@subhamzaalima MgCO3

🪡

So you need a lot of fuel to produce small amount of fuel....... If this is profitable it has been done by large companies long ago..........

@GURGEN_TASHKENT

Жыл бұрын

kzread.infoyrQ0rhheMnM?feature=share

@user-ho2nh3ue7e

11 ай бұрын

some where wood is cheap and oil is expansive . so it's ok but it hard to do in large size because polution.

@ZalamaTheDragonGod

6 ай бұрын

Don't go "durr no profits" monkey brain us now. Oil is still better than microplastics in your food

@cenzo362

6 ай бұрын

​@@ZalamaTheDragonGod already are. Food ingredients (site) "turning plastic into protein: us military backed" 2022

@sksoyeb0303

5 ай бұрын

The government should give subsidies on machines and after product Because this system creates a circular economy and also improves waste management And obviously ' oil is better than micro plastic '