Psychiatry and Law: How Are They Related? (USPHS, 1970)

Ғылым және технология

This film, part of a series produced by the U.S. National Medical Audiovisual Center, presents a discussion about the role of the psychiatrist in criminal law, courtroom, and prison. Alexander Brooks of the Rutgers University Law School moderates. Panelists Dr. Thomas Szasz and Dr. Bernard Diamond take opposing views. Szasz argues that psychiatry is used to manipulate both the law and the defendant, and is not applied in any scientific way in the courtroom, nor can it be. Throughout his career, Szasz contended that mental illness was a myth, and that a medical, neuro-diagnostic model was not useful for understanding the human struggle. Dr. Bernard Diamond, who developed the "diminished capacity" legal defense and testified on behalf of Sirhan Sirhan during his trial for the assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy, argues that defendants can be mentally ill or impaired and that this must be assessed by psychiatrists and considered in trial strategy and in sentencing.
Learn more about this film and search its transcript at NLM Digital Collections: resource.nlm.nih.gov/8800432AA.
Learn more about the National Library of Medicine's historical audiovisuals program at: www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/collections/films

Пікірлер: 31

  • @cherylmburton5577
    @cherylmburton5577 Жыл бұрын

    Dr Szazz said he believed that Psychiatry should never be used involuntarily. He never changed that reasoning.

  • @Tekknorg
    @Tekknorg Жыл бұрын

    Diamond uses cosmetics for his point, which Szasz totally destroys by Logic. I am 100% on the aide of Szasz. I work with so called mentally disabled and forensic people. And his work inspires me.

  • @64bluegrass
    @64bluegrass Жыл бұрын

    The general public doesn't care about what psychiatrists do or say, as long as their "loved" ones are "taken care of." I'm sorry if I offend anyone, but we've gotta be honest. I really encourage everyone to read Szasz's, Psychiatry: The Science of Lies. The section regarding the man who impersonated being a psychiatrist is quite informative.

  • @skeptic1124
    @skeptic1124 Жыл бұрын

    I personally know a person, that was given very toxic illegal drugs without him knowing it. The person ended up in a mental hospital, was held there against his will, and ended up with a schizophrenia diagnosis and a life long prescription for legal toxic drugs from a company with a long criminal history (eli lilly). Despite the fact that the doctors found the drug on the person, they were unable to draw any conclusions. Instead of using common sense letting the person that had no serious life problems and was a child sober up, they drugged him up and stuck a label on him that he now identifies with, and feels personally attacked if anyone disputes the diagnosis. There is no way that a psychiatrist can differentiate between a person under influence of drugs and a seriously disturbed person that is plagued by life problems. Maybe they could have partial success, if their training prepared them for such situations or if their job description involved giving a f about dealing with problems of other people. They just lock you up and drug you up.

  • @oldmanjoeofficial1594

    @oldmanjoeofficial1594

    5 ай бұрын

    perfectly said

  • @oldmanjoeofficial1594
    @oldmanjoeofficial15945 ай бұрын

    Szasz was the ultimate badass. i dedicate a lot to him in my new book. i truly aim to follow in his footsteps

  • @hxdcm
    @hxdcm2 жыл бұрын

    What a pleasant surprise to fall upon this video! Thanks for uploading

  • @oldmanjoeofficial1594
    @oldmanjoeofficial15945 ай бұрын

    the 2 guys clearly were in deep psychological distress during this interview especially the host haha - Szasz was the only one speaking sense and keeping his talk logical and not poetic and BS.

  • @Maxmaxmax63
    @Maxmaxmax632 жыл бұрын

    What an amazing discussion (I dare call it a debate). I found it especially informative as I am currently employed in a state psychiatric hospital. While I sympathize with Dr. Szasz’s views, I am much more partial to Dr. Diamond’s. Mental illness is a real thing and, in some cases, it causes people to lose their agency. When these individuals without agency commit crimes, it is our duty as a society to attempt to rehabilitate them. Now for the questions of who makes the determination as to when an individual loses their agency, or how do we as a society commence with said rehabilitation, I do not have the complete answers for. We live in a civilized society after all and I would like to think that we should try our best to keep it that way.

  • @Get_Yo_Life

    @Get_Yo_Life

    Жыл бұрын

    Mental Illness is a metaphor

  • @nicmart

    @nicmart

    Жыл бұрын

    You are willing to use violence to force what you consider to be treatment on people you consider to be sick. You are an agent of social control, not medicine or science. Your claim that "mental illness is a real thing" is not provable by any anatomical or biological means. And it is peculiar given that the "mind" is a metaphor, not a part of the body. People in your position have declared everything from masturbation, to homosexuality, to epilepsy to be "mental illnesses," and have imprisoned and "treated" such persons against their wills. If someone has a genuine brain disease, it would be malpractice to refer him to a psychiatrist rather than a neurologist.

  • @Get_Yo_Life

    @Get_Yo_Life

    Жыл бұрын

    @@nicmart on that last part you meant refer him to a neurologist rather than a psychiatrist. Great response

  • @nicmart

    @nicmart

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Get_Yo_Life No, I meant what I wrote. Someone with a real disease should be referred to a neurologist, not a psychiatrist.

  • @Get_Yo_Life

    @Get_Yo_Life

    Жыл бұрын

    @@nicmart that’s what I understood from your response. I think I misread or somehow skipped over the word malpractice. My bad

  • @combos7
    @combos72 ай бұрын

    Long live Thomas szasz✍️

  • @sizzla123
    @sizzla1232 жыл бұрын

    Excellent

  • @FreeThought
    @FreeThought3 жыл бұрын

    The link to the original doesn't work, please update to include

  • @cherylmburton5577
    @cherylmburton5577 Жыл бұрын

    English was not the primary language of Thomas Szazz, although he did exceptionally well, but he still had to pause to think of how he would translate. Dr Diamond took full advantage of it, and used manipulation in the same way that Thomas Szazz said the psychiatrists do in the courtroom. He obviously had studied Dr Szazz ahead of time and made himself overwhelming with jargon speech.

  • @deprecated_article9240
    @deprecated_article92402 жыл бұрын

    If I comment here, will it show up, or does it need to be screened to prevent questioning the medical establishment in this critical time?

  • @nicmart

    @nicmart

    Жыл бұрын

    Your comment appears. If it is censored at any time, that will be done by KZread, which is always possible.

  • @user-tz5dm7np3t
    @user-tz5dm7np3t4 ай бұрын

    What is The Truth representative of as far as aired visual content? And who does it aim to please in 2024?

  • @cherylmburton5577
    @cherylmburton5577 Жыл бұрын

    During the second half of the show Dr Szazz brought up the Inquisitions.

  • @cherylmburton5577
    @cherylmburton5577 Жыл бұрын

    Dr Diamond did bring up psychiatrists abusing this system of law

  • @Mark_Ocain
    @Mark_Ocain2 жыл бұрын

    This is maybe very early 60s looking

  • @cherylmburton5577

    @cherylmburton5577

    Жыл бұрын

    It is low quality 1970