WHO WINS???

@rafagamez_art

2 жыл бұрын

Time is an important variable, so what are the conditions to "win"?

@lc3

2 жыл бұрын

You of course. :)

@shinokami2277

2 жыл бұрын

The human touch. The assets applied from experience and mileage. This is what will always win. Ross, you're the best ✨

@odlogirajse5920

2 жыл бұрын

you

@vkarlsen1992

2 жыл бұрын

You’re the best! 👍

Nah man, 4 hours??? Wtf, that’s hella impressive alone 😭😭

@arandootsarandano

Жыл бұрын

I draw an egg in 2 hours💀

@NoYes-xh3sf

Жыл бұрын

Same lmao 💀💀💀

@ExhaustedAmateur

Жыл бұрын

Bro has been drawing the second they left the womb 😨

@AllisonShiro

Жыл бұрын

Today, I struggled to draw book for hour lol.. I know I'm not pro artist but I'm trying to practice lol...

@JoaoSilva-lm4bn

Жыл бұрын

​@@arandootsarandano bruh, u guys can draw an egg? Sheesh

as the AI obviously cant quite campete with artistic skill and stylization im still impressed by how good it mimics a semi-realistic art style

@REJECTFALSEICONZ

2 жыл бұрын

Fr it's kinda scary as an aspiring artist

@blitzie66

2 жыл бұрын

yeah i was not expecting that accuracy from the ai

@med-2014

2 жыл бұрын

But it’s limited to the photo it’s converting, if te photo per se it’s bad, it’ll be bad and won’t compete

@REJECTFALSEICONZ

2 жыл бұрын

@@med-2014 but still, we can see how much technology has improved from 2010-2020,its going to get better in the next few years and that's terrifying

@breewashere

2 жыл бұрын

@@med-2014 sometimes it'll be a blob

This is like comparing a fake stone to a real diamond. Real artists shines the brightest!✨

@GenericSlugcat

10 сағат бұрын

Exactly. AI was supposed to be a blessing, yet it became a curse.

your drawing actually has life, the AI just replicated real life with no substance

@rovertarthead

Ай бұрын

lol 6 fingers and attached pupils to eyelids there always good at that.

@DanielIskrov

17 күн бұрын

​@@rovertarthead not rooting for AI art but this was two years ago lol but it still has similar issues

@rovertarthead

Күн бұрын

@@DanielIskrov Eh

@DanielIskrov

18 сағат бұрын

@@rovertarthead it says 2 yrs ago in the description

The AI one looks like someone just used a filter on the photo and called it a day. Your drawing took skill and effort to make.

@technus147

8 ай бұрын

I mean yeah? the filters are ai

@pufflepoint2

7 ай бұрын

That's literally what it is

@Biggiecheese20

6 ай бұрын

This one was a filter, idk if this was the best example for AI art

@Mroziukz

6 ай бұрын

Yeah, it's almost like the AI used a filter.

@MaryHernandez-lq8kq

6 ай бұрын

Agree the artist wins and the viewer too!💖

The artist always wins. There’s nothin like seeing a human being put time and effort into their craft. Plus it's not fair to call AI art the same as what humans make. Truthfully, anything can be art, because there are many different forms of it. LIke pottery, sculpting etc. But I find it disrespectfull when people say AI is the same as human creativity. It is a different form of art that is completely different with how humans create. It is the same as hand-made goods that are compared to factory materials, they simply aren't the same.

@adishram

Жыл бұрын

The speedrun is a proof that it's art.

@sidjones16

Жыл бұрын

Not in business. Why pay him x amount of money and wait 2 days when I could get an app and have the same thing in a fraction of time?

@adishram

Жыл бұрын

@@sidjones16 AI CGI is not the same thing. Then you can say photography and photo editing is also the same. My point is the more there will be CGI the higher there will be the value for the real thing.

@Whatman11

Жыл бұрын

​@@sidjones16 More and more artists are being fed to artificial intelligence, depriving them of their individuality. This is actually soul murder. A useful tool that is useful only when it is regulated and works for the benefit of humanity. AI builds and generates new works by copying and combining other works by artists who have not given their consent to this Yes, you can say that a person also kind of takes the work of other artists But inspiration and copying are not the same thing.

@xiiir838

Жыл бұрын

​@@Whatman11 a "souls" doesn't feed your stomach. Quit that BS about the artist "soul" nobody gives a sh¡t about that, specially employers

That screen is GIANT

@4deemi

Ай бұрын

yeah i just tried looking at my own desk to see the scale AND BRO WHY DOES HE HAS AN 50 SQUARE FEET TABLE

@holidayturnpike

15 күн бұрын

Glad I'm not the only one wondering wth is going on with his drawing surface size. What is it called lol 😂

@holidayturnpike

15 күн бұрын

Glad I'm not the only one wondering wth is going on with his drawing surface size. What is it called lol 😂

@xxflowergurlboiixx

12 күн бұрын

Omg i want that-

@bungeepete7393

3 күн бұрын

It must be so comfortable to draw on I use a normal sized tablet, it's really not that bad though, atleast compared to using a phone

Real artists will always be better 💪

@user-ec6vf7zq9j

Ай бұрын

but not faster! If artists weren't scared out of their minds... then they would realize that their digital art programs have been part AI this whole time and would start incorporating it to make their workflow faster...same thing with traditional artists and digital art---stubbornly sticking to shovels when there are excavators is foolish while the rest of the world and the industries are speeding up because of ai.

@dodhethompson4841

19 күн бұрын

Until they don't lol

@TheGreyBird71

15 күн бұрын

⁠​⁠@@user-ec6vf7zq9jim sorry but with ai you have limitations with the power of drawing you can do anything can your ai draw the most cursed stuff known to man plus ai arts style looks so fake it doesn’t look pretty

@rileyinscoe3558

11 күн бұрын

​@user-ec6vf7zq9j but then it looks worse... CAUSE IT'S AI. AI art looks worse and makes way more mistakes, it doesn't make sense to make a drawing half AI and half real, especially because you'll probably notice the art difference.

@dodhethompson4841

6 күн бұрын

@@rileyinscoe3558 Right now yeah, but eventually it'll be indistinguishable from what humans are making

The real artist always wins

@cub_baller

Ай бұрын

in creativity not the AI does have creativity I don't know out of nowhere you can put a flying cow behind an image

@TinPanMan_REAL

Ай бұрын

Stick man art is better than what AI could possibly fathom

@leobrsoulmaster

Ай бұрын

Yah surez bur have some Ai app the make amazing draws.. and this is sux 😢

The thing with A.I. art is that it misses a human touch that makes art so beautiful in my opinion.

@thealphavoid7109

Жыл бұрын

So true 😔

@fgjjdgb3949

Жыл бұрын

I would say this defines the concept of art for ourselves, art should have its own background, concepts, sketches, experiments and formation. Of course, the development of AI promises many ruin, but it can also finally make us think about the true value of art.

@damrona3315

Жыл бұрын

bruh its an ai, art is not human is a thing lmao

@kawaiidere1023

Жыл бұрын

It also fucked up the reflection on the buildings. Transparency instead of reflection

@damrona3315

Жыл бұрын

@@kawaiidere1023 i mean it make that art in 4 seconds, what will it do in 4 hours

100% going for the artist

Ai in my opinion could NEVER replace what a person can create! So much more life can be seen in the drawing! 🤩🤩

@dodhethompson4841

19 күн бұрын

Until it can, wittch will happen eventually

@Deadlee8883

18 сағат бұрын

@@dodhethompson4841 learn to spell lil bro :D

@dodhethompson4841

17 сағат бұрын

@@Deadlee8883 bro has no argument so he attacks points completely irrelevant

The AI one looks like a sick filter though.

@Jsjdn3555

2 жыл бұрын

Does anyone know what the filter is called?

@meliiscool9776

2 жыл бұрын

@@Jsjdn3555 its the cartoon filter on the app “prequel”

@silverblue73

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly, a filter isn’t AI, but whatever gets the views I guess

@casenswartz7278

2 жыл бұрын

@@silverblue73 Actually a filter is AI, all AI is, is a series of nodes with a number value and a bias value, linking to other nodes, and the image goes in, and this one was built so that another image comes out. It uses Convolution because it is an image recognition model. I had to make one for school, that's why I know....

@hollow_shadows

2 жыл бұрын

Facts

The AI can't make such conscious artistic choices like changing, exaggerating proportions, facial expressions, colors, lighting etc to make them more appealing / interesting than they were in the original photo.

@AllegraJina

2 жыл бұрын

The App changed my pretty brown eyes into blue ones though. 👀 Even though they are clearly brown. I was surprised lol It also made my lips fuller. So it does change things to make someone more appealing.

@realswobby

2 жыл бұрын

@@AllegraJina I'm not talking about such simple changes but just compare Ross' drawing to the AI one and analyze differences.

@AllegraJina

2 жыл бұрын

@@realswobby you don't need to convince me. I like his picture more and humans can still do better and more creative art than AI. It's just interesting to see that we're at this level that it looks like art.

@khawlahazwar7475

2 жыл бұрын

@@AllegraJina what app is that lol I just knew from watching this vid

@bemlok

2 жыл бұрын

It actually can.

Dude the real art looks SOOO much better than the AI. To quote Toy Story. “You can’t rush art.”

These challenges are cool and all but shoutout to kahma for the easy fancy photos thatll level up my LinkedIn for sure 😎

AI - lifeless artist - warm and lively

@lautaroescarlon7501

Жыл бұрын

You can just ask the AI to make warm and lively art. Instead of asking it to recreate a photo, you ask "recreate this selfie in a colorful and expressive style" and it does. you just have to know how to work around GPT.

@nipnop4954

Жыл бұрын

cope

@itzmeolivia

Жыл бұрын

@@nipnop4954The only response you could come up with was “cope”?

@nipnop4954

Жыл бұрын

@@itzmeolivia enough to upset u so i guess

@prismozunfunny

Жыл бұрын

​@@nipnop4954 u didn't tho, just shows ur ignorant.

The thing that A.I. art lacks, is creativity.

@wwddwi2183

6 ай бұрын

No soul or energy, you can’t teach that.👈🏿🫡

@ravenlicious6912

4 ай бұрын

I was searching for this comment

@NoahtheGameplayer

3 ай бұрын

It's funny that you said it lacked creativity even though it literally shows creativity

@NoahtheGameplayer

3 ай бұрын

Besides, AI cannot do anything without human art, so it's still just like all of us where we are inspired by arts from other people, that we create our own little thing, That's the exact same thing as how a AI would be trained on many, many arts, just for the bot to be more creative and not be copwriting literally

@Warrior-fd7of

3 ай бұрын

@@NoahtheGameplayer it doesnt show any creativity, it just traced the drawing

The AI art was sharp but I really liked the results from kahma as well, way more natural vibes perfect for online dating.

Tbh i LOVE yours and damn 4 hours?! I couldnt in ten but one thing i noticed was yours looked like it was in shock more than the AIs but other than that yours is absolutely awesome

Not even gonna lie, the AI literally just traced the real image, gave no interesting lighting/shadows, and somehow made the real person look static and robotic (wonder why hmmmm?). Very good work on yours. I love the expression, the background, the coloring and shading, the GORGEOUS highlights on her hair, ahh-- I just love it!

@sheryboom678

Жыл бұрын

??? Why are people shittinf over ai? Obviusly it won't be as good as real art, but why people want to compete

@7secouds607

Жыл бұрын

​@@sheryboom678 people are upset because AI uses the work of actual artists, who put actual time into their work, and copies it. No thought is put into it, no time is put into it(other than making the AI itself), and its downright just disrespectful towards the artists who don't want to be apart of this AI nonsense. You can like AI, you can dislike AI, but there's always one fact that is almost impossible to disagree with; it'd be perfectly fine if it didn't take from artists who don't want to be apart of it. It's disrespectful and literally takes business away from people who actually care about what they're putting out, which isn't something AI can understand.

@sheryboom678

Жыл бұрын

@@7secouds607 Uhm... What? That's not how AI works tho? One ai learns what is art and what is not. Then another that is randomly made, start to bump out images. They start as random noise, the AI that knows how art looks like, rewards or punishes the creating AI, until it learn to create propper images. The images are only required so that the first AI knows what is and what is not. Even if we ban that, the second one will still be available.

@davimatos985

Жыл бұрын

@@sheryboom678 My brother in christ, there's literally people typing artists names in Art AIs and the AIs give result, and for that the AI need to search through the internet, take several arts of this creator without their consent and mash it all to create something ""new"" Also, the problem are not the AIS itself, they are a good experiment on the capabilities of ai. the problem is it feeding on artists and copying them+people using it to sell art that they did not even drew. and claiming the art "their own" that is both a disrespect to the AI creators and artists it fed on.

@Brunette_2005

Жыл бұрын

It is good for ai art standards but comparing it to man made artwork it just has no charming characteristics as the art style is just a traced form of the image itself

Personally liked yours better, not just because of the knowledge that's handmade but because when someone does the art of course can decide what and what not to add to make it more appealing while the auto generated one had little details that weren't as aesthetic. Being able to choose where to lead the eye into the image and on what focus details and stuff is not something a camera/filter does but the person behind it and- I don't know, love your art as always

@GXelz

2 жыл бұрын

Wow that is so thoughtful and well analyzed when seeing the difference between Artist and AI ^^

@princessthyemis

2 жыл бұрын

You're totally right!!

@5spec

2 жыл бұрын

I gotta be honest, gen z has absolutely destroyed the word "aesthetic" and I cannot look at that word without a negative feeling anymore

@highdefinition450

2 жыл бұрын

Also the style is just better lol, the AI just made the same picture but with paint haha

@bench7288

2 жыл бұрын

not only that, but his art is more lively! Also, the AIs art is "done" because it reached the capacity of it's capability. this dude's art is done because he thought that it's enough.

No robot will defeat human creativity

The 4 hours one looks like it’s staring into your soul

AI should be used as a tool for inspiration or jokes not ment to replace real hard work and talent

@ziggyziggyzag.

6 ай бұрын

Yes

@Gamerkye4751

3 ай бұрын

Preach

@Official_Neneko

3 ай бұрын

SAY IT LOUDER

@M1sao

3 ай бұрын

SAY IT LOUDER TO PEOPLE WHO THINK AI IS ART!!

@CrystalStarscape

3 ай бұрын

i don't have artistic talent

Skipped to the end to make things fair (I do not like AI), and I decided the bottom one looked better. It’s more expressive, has less mistakes, and a more visually interesting background.

The ai one makes it look like a failed celebrity wax figure while your art actually does it justice. You win by a mile! ❤

Actual person knows how to put some personality into their work, who wouldve guessed haha

@gatonegro2151

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I've been looking at several AI images and after a while they all look the same, they all use the same semi-realistic technique, the same poses, expression, and color schemes, it doesn't create anything new. With art you can always create new things, different color palettes and poses. Also, apparently you need to try about 200 times to get something decent :b it's not worth it from where you see it.

@reneablackheart9563

Жыл бұрын

@@gatonegro2151 ikr like how is that even enjoyable, just draw it at that point

@reneablackheart9563

Жыл бұрын

@Snowy They still shouldn't claim it as their own, and also should keep in mind that most of them were trained on stolen art from real people

@samugames0

Жыл бұрын

To be honest the girl was emotionless in the photo already and the artist changed that while the AI didn't

@Driptacular_Dragonborn

Жыл бұрын

🤯

The human hand is filled with love and passion while the code of an AI is nothing more than just obedience

@nipnop4954

Жыл бұрын

cope

@yeoldegrayCat

Жыл бұрын

@@nipnop4954 ai isn't going away, just like no one has been able to stop file sharing through torrents for example. However if it weren't for all the hours put in by humans learning to create beautiful art the ai would have had nothing to learn from and you wouldn't be able to mash something good looking up on your own with a few keywords. So I can't help but find the people that are going around telling people to "stop learning how to draw because AI can do it for you" to be complete asstards (also the process of creating something gives artists a hit of dopamine, can serve for relaxation & therapy etc). And people going on strike and whatnot to put a stop to Ai should just focus on potential ways to make use of it going forward, or if they really hate the idea of the art being fed to it find some way to hide it.

@flemter

Жыл бұрын

You’re so right! I’m really looking forward to using AI art to assist me in the future. It’ll be way easier to make backgrounds and reference photos!

@prithyachan333

Жыл бұрын

Guys stop replying to nipnop. He is a bot replying with the same thing under every comment.

@nipnop4954

Жыл бұрын

@@prithyachan333 bots stay winning 😁

YOU DEFINITELY WIN!! AND YOU DESERVE IT ❤️❤️

The AI shows a literal interpretation, yours shows how the photo made you feel, and how you saw it. It’s a lot cooler than the AI

HOW DO YOU MAKE SOMETHING LIKE THAT IN ONLY 4 HOURS AND A HALF?? that's the most mind blowing thing for me. That's barely enough time for me to block and choose the right colors xd

@franciscomanuel7377

Жыл бұрын

The most important Way to achieve that is to use good programs and the most important thing is to get the control as you control your hands, to control your tables and the program. And painting obviously.

@damnman7226

Жыл бұрын

Practise and patience most AI users are rushing the process because they can’t draw and feel hopeless to learn it

@Natsukashii-Records

Жыл бұрын

@@damnman7226 Or they have actual jobs and not enough money on the side to throw 200 bucks for 4 hours of an artist's work for a pinup.

@TheWildLapiz

Жыл бұрын

Practice. Lots of practice!

@hatsukegero

Жыл бұрын

the person who made this art, made another arts too, it just have experience

The Artist definitely wins. He put a lot of details and crafts to his art work. No matter how long it takes.

You won The moment you made that circle

How about add a third challenger…a purely practical artist. You know, pen, paint, canvas only. Even the “Pro Artist” here has half his work done with computer assistance. In the 80s, I was a Graphic Artist for a Screen Printing company. Everything I did was with pen, ink, vellum, and cameras (to create the final images to be burned onto the mesh). I created corporate and private logos, t-shirt designs, banners, billboards, signs, basically anything you can think of. Even the curved letters on hats and Ts were done by hand, using protractors, rulers, and freehand much of the time. In 1988, we paid $28k for a computer to assist in our imaging creation and of course storage, accounting, business management. I recall it was $150 for each new “text” we wanted to use. It was very useful in creating curved, dimensional, or warped lettering, and Clip Art was a big time saver, but overall, I still pretty much would freehand draw 80-90% of each finished image. Then scan the image and produce the final film for burning screens. Creating a four color processed image, by hand, was an incredibly challenging task. Computers certainly helped in that aspect, but to me, the cost benefit never made sense. They spent what equaled 16 months of my salary to assist me in what I already did. Keep in mind this was the mid to late 80s, in SC, so we didn’t make much, lol.

The Ai art feels uncanny, only a real artist can catch the vibe and meaning of art

@ishowsokka

Жыл бұрын

Sounds like cope to me

@ZHIEND_

Жыл бұрын

​@@ishowsokkanah ai art is soulless

@ishowsokka

Жыл бұрын

@@ZHIEND_ I can show you ai art and tell its not ai and you won't now difference.

@ZHIEND_

Жыл бұрын

@@ishowsokka I know, I already experienced that. It's soulless not because It looks bad. It could look awesome but still not hold value as soon as I realize it's AI because It's just pixels, It's not a work. I like to look at art and go "yes, someone who is like me drew that", It makes me respect the person behind it, It's some form of a communication.

@Trigger_Nash

Жыл бұрын

You are uncanny.

You win. And not just ‘cause you’re the actual artist, but because it genuinely looks better. You’re very talented!

@StarMisura

11 ай бұрын

Thank you for actually saying reasons instead of another bland comment, sure AI images can’t beat artist, but those comments might as well be AI generated because of how repetitive they are with nearly no differences and actual clear opinions

@cameron9292

8 ай бұрын

4.5 seconds and another 5 minutes of refining and editing and the ai art would look just as good if not better. If you do art for personal reasons then go right ahead, but I can't see anyone trying to monetize off art spending 4+ hours on something that will take 5 minutes

@Dragonceratops

8 ай бұрын

That's not true. It's not a matter of editing the piece, it's a matter of both pieces being in fundamentally different styles. There are issues and downsides to the AI generated piece that can't be fixed in 5 minutes.@@cameron9292

@theducknamednewepicla9507

7 ай бұрын

Yup

@ao_sssan

7 ай бұрын

​@@cameron9292 have you considered that they may not just do it for money, but because they love doing art?

Pro artists have something that AI can’t replicate: effort

@bruh-it1or

3 ай бұрын

and creativity, it just takes from the internet

its so sad to think some people would probably think the artist's one is Ai generated now

Your art feels so alive and colorful! While the AI art feels dark and dull… you definitely win for me! Edit: looks like world war 3 started in the replies- i just wanted to share my opinion but i guess some random kids wanted to start some kind of argument :-:

@blurtam188

Жыл бұрын

The AI art could be touched up in 1/2 hr to be almost the same. But, if the AI art is so bad then artists have nothing to complain about.

@justaloserrr

Жыл бұрын

@@blurtam188 They have the right to complain because of every Artist uses social media or have much followers some works for industries and they need to feed themselves if companies see AI makes art faster they don't care and some already doing that because "If it's faster it's better" at least better for them but not for Artist. They got to be constant feat whether the company will like the sht or their customers would like it or not. They have the constant fear of doing anything wrong and try their best to be good especially because of AI it has increased even more

@PerfectPyro217

Жыл бұрын

​@@justaloserrr is that supposed to be his problem? Your problem that you choose a artist as a career path and not a hobby. Don't be surprised when people invent something practical.

@blurtam188

Жыл бұрын

@@justaloserrr Everybody has the right to complain. Others have the right to ignore those complaints if it's just a bunch of gate keepers complaining about not being able to charge the plebs for the privilege to explore art. Be better, not bitter.

@deathlight4210

Жыл бұрын

@@blurtam188 AI art uses art from other creators without permission or compensation…

Ai generated arts may take less than a minute to complete, but a handmade, brain-worked, human touch artwork is what gives life and perfection to it. Despite AI looking so amazing and beautiful, they still lack at composing or presenting nicely.

@otteration9891

Жыл бұрын

This isn’t entirely true, at least not with Stable Diffusion

@bisualvasic

Жыл бұрын

This video is over a year old. We have style adapters and instant concept transfer.

@Jaemy_art

Жыл бұрын

It just really depends on the client at this point when you want a human-made work, go for it and pay some artist. But i f you want AI art then it's fine go for it. Theres no way no one will prefer real human artist from time to time. Its like why would you want a person to do photorealism of your photo when you can just take a the reference picture and put black and white filter on it?

@_nob0dy_297

Жыл бұрын

Fr

@nbewarwe

Жыл бұрын

And they can't draw hands either.

You made really good art

RAHH YOURS IS SO BEAUTIFUL!! :3

This gives me hope that ai art won't replace human art. Great work!

@mitazil

Жыл бұрын

Being realistic, It probably will in future, I can imagine companies abusing of that, they already doesnt like to pay artists as they deserve...

@emparin9159

Жыл бұрын

It probably will as the other comment said

@earthyemeraldy

Жыл бұрын

@Mit You have a point there, but I feel like cartoons are safe from being ai generated (for now).

@gatonegro2151

Жыл бұрын

In the future, perhaps, but I think that by then they had also restricted and regulated more it use. Besides, at the moment the IAs are still very limited to one pose and expression, and the fact that you cannot have copyright of the IA images will make many companies not interested.

@ElaraArale

Жыл бұрын

it will lol, the technology its not so advanced yet, lol artist are easily replaceable

no competition here, artist win every time. i love seeing the human and stylistic touch you put into your work ❤️

Depends. Do you have the time to wait four hours? If not, that picture looked pretty good for only taking four seconds.

Absolutely beautiful ❤ Yours is way better hands down! ❤

You win by far! AI has nothing on a real human’s hard work

@idk_juliet9544

Жыл бұрын

I also think the drawn one is better because of the style, but saying that the ai doesn’t take work is a straight up lie. Some one probably took a long time to code the ai itself especially one that is that good. It is a human’s hard work

@akiraakiraki

Жыл бұрын

​@@idk_juliet9544 now compare the hard work of a prompt to a professional drawing

@akiraakiraki

Жыл бұрын

​@@idk_juliet9544 now compare the hard work of a prompt to a professional drawing

@cubonefan3

Жыл бұрын

@@akiraakirakiit’s probably about equivalent effort…. But 1 ai developer is probably more valuable to society than 1 artist.

@Lan_Hoa

Жыл бұрын

Real human but product is like Animation.

Ai art is just too precise at what it does to the point it loses the stylistic part of Art

I feel like AI just lacks soul like the drawing that you made feels like you put work into it. You know you put your love into it. AI just looks like you generated it and called it a day.

One turned it into a picture with random lines added, one turned it into an actual original drawing.

Pro Artist. No competion.

@Flxmeplxyz

2 ай бұрын

Pesonally ai easily wins

@ashleydean8895

2 ай бұрын

@@Flxmeplxyz Gross. Plagiarism software will never compare.

@Flxmeplxyz

2 ай бұрын

@@ashleydean8895 its just better in this one video

@Flxmeplxyz

2 ай бұрын

@@ashleydean8895 your bias, im honest.

@ashleydean8895

2 ай бұрын

@@Flxmeplxyz It's not even about bias. Just LOOK at them. The AI gives her a lazy/apathetic look while having clouds that don't even look like clouds. The buildings are clipped, uneven, and have no discernable detail to them. The actual drawing is filled with balanced lighting, accurate reflections, even windows, layers of shadow to outline the face better, and the clothes look less flat that the AI. The actual art piece wins. Hands. Down.

Even when the IA looks pretty good, yours have more personality, and details like the changes in the background, that generally makes it look more alive and dynamic. The IA one looks kind of stiff at least in comparasion

@Error-is-here

2 жыл бұрын

And personally I I like the lightning technique they did

True art will always be better and win honestly toward AI art. ✨❤️💖💜

Man easy win for the artist!

Next to yours, it was easy to notice these flaws in the AI's: -the eyes look lifeless -skin lacks pigmentation and color variety -the hair looks matted/discolored/thin -jacket is textureless as a garbage bag and looks like one too -Sis are those clouds? I don't think so And that's just the tip of the iceberg

@porkoltkecske1296

Жыл бұрын

Jeah thats totaly true but who knows when do they fix these

@iexisted583

Жыл бұрын

It also reminds me of semirealistic art styles

@eyesaiah8405

Жыл бұрын

The eyes look almost exactly as the original image...

@meneither3834

Жыл бұрын

Depends on how many iterations the AI had tbh.

@manhcuong3035

Жыл бұрын

@@porkoltkecske1296 Yeah, that just frightens me, right now i'm an art student and i need at least 5 to 7 years to reach my full potential. But the developments of technology knows no bound, so i'm afraid that i'm striving forward just to see a death's end.

PLUS! Making art from scratch is so satisfying for my soul. It makes you view the piece as ART rather than as a PRODUCT.

The real winner would be if they used the AI to make a baseline and then touched it up to look good

I like how in your version the eyes and face look so lively while in the AI version the eyes look so dead.

The AI looks cool today but so many people are using it that it´s gonna turno unto some generic crap, An artist Style will not

@dodonodens8802

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah.

@trigestigro4707

2 жыл бұрын

Thats already generic xD I loved first time thou

@bemlok

2 жыл бұрын

AI can create different styles. An AI can make anime from regular photos for example.

@santiagobojorquez

2 жыл бұрын

@@bemlok it does not create. It tries to replicate styles. But it does not have it´s own.

@bemlok

2 жыл бұрын

@@santiagobojorquez What is create a style? To create, a human need to practice using references, things that we saw, experiences that we had, practicing using principle of drawing, design, painting. And actually, a good way of creating your own style is replicate styles. There's a book called "steal like an artist" that explains this concept. Steal, replicate, until you create your own style. Machine learning works in the same.

There’s so much more life in yours, I’d say definitely you won, you spent a nice amount of time to create something worth winning!

There's only one correct option. Real artists win, every time.

I’m sorry, only four hours? I expected like twelve! I think yours is better, ngl. There’s much more attention to little details, rather than just the big picture. Not to mention the clouds and buildings in the ai image look super off for some reason. You nailed it though! Very nice :D

You win! As an artist I feel so much anger towards ai art. It can’t quite catch that beautiful side of handmade art. 🍷🗿

@tresblo

Жыл бұрын

🍷🗿

@cawsomeaolin

Жыл бұрын

i feel like people are gonna use ai and pretend they drew it themselves and boom no effort at all

@Random11111

Жыл бұрын

@@cawsomeaolin sadly people already do that

@cubonefan3

Жыл бұрын

Cry more

@maxinefinnfoxen

Жыл бұрын

​@@cawsomeaolin happens all the time on art station and the company isn't doing anything to stop it.

Pro artist, of course AI’s shall never compare to our superior minds, no matter how many times I’ve lost to an AI at chess (I’ve lost a lot of games)

@allfires4957

Жыл бұрын

Fear fear tin

@jinsakai409

Жыл бұрын

Unfortunately AI is made from our minds though. An artist even trained it to draw like kim jung gi…I hate people

@CrimsonDawn-ou4og

Жыл бұрын

@@jinsakai409 Wow. I don't know what to say except I'll just keep my head down away from the thunderstorm of worries I have about thid AI stuff and hope when I become an adult seriously needing to make momey, AIs don't snatch my hopes and dreams away

@art25

Жыл бұрын

​@@CrimsonDawn-ou4og, bro, just listen, I'm fucking wanna die because of AI, I already spend 1,5 year studying, drawing, I was hopefull about my future skill, I thought i will grow up in my skills and I will making NSFW stuff and earn money on it. And now, from outta nowhere appears that fucking AI that already can generate UNLIMITLESS NSFW stuff, sure, AI still can't generate exactly what client want but I'm fucking scary that as soon as possible he will be able DO THAT and digital artist will be no more need for it because, like who would waste 50-100$ to commision with real artist for 1 art when there is exist AI, that for 25$ per mounth can generate ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING YOU WANT

@CrimsonDawn-ou4og

Жыл бұрын

@@art25 an AI can only do so much You can't tell it to make the hair look like this or have the shoes look like that. Sure they can toon real photos but I'm positive there will be a lot of aspects it can't take. That and /or people will see reasons why commissioning a person just works a lot better. I've been drawing for 5 years now so I can't quit because some AIs popped up out of nowhere.... Oh well. Just gotta see what the future holds I guess

"Ai is gonna replace even the best artists" The best artists:

Ai "art" shouldn't even be called art.

*Now draw her stealing the Chaos Emeralds.*

@S-CB-SL-Animations

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

@HiCringe

Жыл бұрын

Now draw her bombing an island.

Your artwork is for sure better! It's way more lively and colourful, and it's also more meaningful because you took the time and effort to draw it from scratch, rather than a computer just generating a stylized image.

Your drawing has more emotion to it. You are the real winner.

PRO ARTIST WINS

I think your art wins, because the person you drew shows more emotion than the AI art, like look at that emotionless woman 🧐

@kirakishoushirobara2898

Жыл бұрын

The original photo looks like that lol the artist actually gave the photograph more emotion than it had originally

@sarov7658

Жыл бұрын

Untrue lol speaking Outta ass be like

@MariamArt_

Жыл бұрын

exactly the artist gave it so much emotion and depth. fr fr…they’ll just be another emotionless robot with no fucking shit

@cythism8106

Жыл бұрын

It's because AI does something called over fitting. To put it simply, it tries to mimic the source image too closely. Humans are able to control how closely they mimic the source image. At least im pretty sure this is how it works. Don't quote me on anything.

@andreasegura8957

Жыл бұрын

@@cythism8106 Very soon, AI will be able to do so too. I even think it is able to do so right now, but you have to tell it what to do. In this case, they told the AI to just make it cartoonish, not to be original, so this is the result.

Your art is more "live" and it have something special)))

@demonvictim

Жыл бұрын

The thing is that they set the eyes perspective as it looks down on you whilst the ai has the eyes looking straight whilst not bring the point of focus. So in comparison ai is the girl looking at their phone the artist is the girl looking at you

Ross out-AIed the AI with creativity and skill. Thank you for your art Ross!

Bro yours is like a billion times superior in many ways.

As good as ai art gets, it will never be as good as a real artist

@topguyz1045

Жыл бұрын

You made this statement 4months ago

@topguyz1045

Жыл бұрын

@@ImJustBen AI art arguably has advanced more than this

@topguyz1045

Жыл бұрын

@@ImJustBen By now due to the continueos training of AI image models, the replication of such works can be easily performed. In addition, artists who are concerned with commercial use of art commissions may no longer be in high demand as commercially large quantities of demanded art can now be produced without necessarily making use of much efforts. Thereby yielding more results that the average freelance artist

@topguyz1045

Жыл бұрын

@@ImJustBen True, but how many people would benefit from the art sold at museums, only few

@pointcrowscreepyuncle

Жыл бұрын

@@topguyz1045 also ai art has reached a peak because theres too much ai art now so the old and faulty ai art where like hands and faces are messed up is leaking into the ais database almost like an ai inbreeding

I love being a actual artist

The pro artist portrait will always be worth more.

Obviously you won sis, LOOK AT THEM BUILDINGS IN THE AI ONE 😭

The ai art won't have the same feeling as the drawn one

@nocbvideos6458

Жыл бұрын

not yet

@trebuchet8568

Жыл бұрын

@@nocbvideos6458 i hope whoever develops them be able to do that dies from cancer or something

@kittenkenoobi6294

Жыл бұрын

@@nocbvideos6458 never will

@Icewind007

Жыл бұрын

@@kittenkenoobi6294 Uhh... We're already there. Given a proper model, AI surpasses human capability. It can use the best patterns of every art that has existed in its influence. As we have more time to train better models, it's only getting better. Don't try to outrun a car, you won't win. AI will do what people do, but better.

@MewMew375

Жыл бұрын

@@Icewind007hell no are you a robot or something?

My thing with AI art is that there's basically no thought given to the details of images or why things are the way they are. When something is made by a human artist, all those elements always have consideration so much that under scrutiny, everything look good to the eyes. Scrutinizing AI art always turns up tiny weird details or general forms that just don't really make *that* much sense to humans (imo) Like the AI's clouds for example.... yours just look SO much better and more natural

@queasyweasel

10 ай бұрын

Didn't even notice the clouds at first! Spot-on!

@sownheard

7 ай бұрын

Because its the human using the ai that creates the final outcome. Ai don't care so you have to put effort into to understand how the tool works

@NinjaHeart

6 ай бұрын

Yeh, I want to be an author but I don't think anyone can really do my book covers so I guess I'LL just use AI. I used AI and I wanted a girl but it came out with three arms I was like. "Bro what the heck is this?" So I kept trying, but it is a lot faster.

@Gacha_Nazrinofficial

5 ай бұрын

​@@NinjaHeartI hope you're only using AI as an idea generator rather than just using the image itself

@mayandjune346

4 ай бұрын

❤

I prefer the 4 hour one. Human wins. U can feel the character personality and the style is cuter ❤

People should be using AI in this manner. Using it either for inspiration or color/lighting, not replacing the work of the artist, but helping them in areas they might struggle with, though I doubt this artist needed any help 😂 Love the style and expressiveness!

The artist one feels more alive while the ai just looks flat

the artist's piece pulls a lot more attention from the little detail all the way down to the model staring directly at you and the clarity of the background as well

You won ofc!!!! A computer can never beat an artist who put their sweat, tears as soul into a piece

I don’t think any sane person will argue that the AI won, you take the cake easily 🎂

love the AI art style but with a real person they simply have so much ability to add "more" to a drawing with their own style and touches (more exaggerated light, different brush textures, different colors) whereas AI tends to be too consistent and can cause a piece to look flat, and it can only convert what it's given.

Definitely the artist , no doubt. No matter if any artist is not good enough to make better than AI but still that effort , that emotion means alot ✨

Artist obv effort was put and tbh it just looks more natural

Thanks for winning the artist side🎉

Any art done by a human hand with blood sweat and tears is obviously the winner here. LIKE BRO LOOK AT LEONARDO DA VINCI HE DRAWS LIKE A PRINTER-

@Biodegradable-Trash9005

Жыл бұрын

@Steepshine • 핈 lol-

Pro artist wins hands down

AI never wins. Real artists will always be better.

The actual art one looks more stylish, interesting, original. It takes a win

The art he made wins by a mile. Too bad that someone might have fed it to an AI machine already... This whole situation is just devastating for artists.

@SovermanandVioboy

Жыл бұрын

its actually becoming more and more devastating for AI devs rn, bcs of all the lawsuits and copyright claims. Commercially, AI is pretty much dead alrdy.

No one can replace real artist's art

The drawing is better than the ai, I love it

ONLY 4 HOURS??? wish I was that awesome!