I love how they just seamlessly go into the prosaic business of the orders of the day.

He was escorted by the Duke of Kent and the Duke of Gloucester, who are also princes of the United Kingdom (first cousins to the Queen)

@thedragonfly1993

6 жыл бұрын

BucyKalman Indeed, the Lord Chancellor twice over. A great legal mind!

@jesusthroughmary

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks. As a tennis fan I recognized The Duke of Kent, but I didn't recognize The Duke of Gloucester.

@roscomeon3965

Жыл бұрын

Two useless parasites who have never done a day's work in their lives. Same as Andrew the Duke of Pork.

@LordBeauchamp1994

7 ай бұрын

Who is the other man in peerage robes holding the stick

Andrew: After this I'm going to call my friend Geoffrey to bring some of his friends so that we can celebrate...

@mikeggg5671

Жыл бұрын

you are a cad. His Royal Highness is innocent. Stop your slander

@mikeggg5671

7 ай бұрын

@@MatthewPlant05 he is a member of the royal family. He is beyond reproach. If he says he did nothing wrong, then we believe him.

'Killyleagh' is a town in my native County Down. It is pronounced 'Killy-Lay' not 'Killy-Lee'...

Some of those present look highly amused.

I hate Tony Blair for excluding the hereditary peers from the House of Lords. If the Lords was becoming too populated, reforms could be passed. A reform could pass where a peer must retire after the age of seventy-five or after twenty years of service in the chamber, whichever may come first. Tony Blair introduced party politics into the Lords and it has now become biased compared to what it was before 1999.

@rwboa22

3 жыл бұрын

Would make more logical sense, as bishops in the Church of England and the Law Lords had mandatory retirement ages, and hereditary and life peers, except for the Duke of Norfolk (Hereditary Earl Marshal of England) and the Marquess of Cholmondeley (Lord Great Chamberlain), should be subject to mandatory retirement age (70) much like the Senators in the Canadian Parliament. However one of the biggest differences between a Royal Duke (like Charles, as Duke of Cornwall in England and Duke of Rothesay in Scotland) and a Noble Duke (like the Duke of Norfolk) is that Royal Dukes are not permitted to speak in sessions of the Lords. That was one of the main reasons why the former Edward VIII, upon abdication, was made a Royal Duke, given that George VI didn't want his older brother to cause headaches in the Chamber of Peers had he just simply enobled him as "His Grace, The Duke of Windsor". As for Norfolk and Cholmondeley, when they turn 70, their heir apparents, as Earl of Arundel (Norfolk) and Earl of Rocksavage (Cholmondeley) would be called to sit alongside of their fathers, allowing the transition to start so that when the incumbents pass or are physically unable to carry out their duties, Arundel and Rocksavage can just simply pick up the duties in an official or acting capacity.

@LordBeauchamp1994

2 жыл бұрын

@@rwboa22 royal Dukes can speak they aren't allowed to vote

@LordBeauchamp1994

Жыл бұрын

@@rwboa22 or rather they can vote and speak but out of convention they don't speak on political or controversial issues. And most royal peers rarely attend the Lords I think Prince Philip did twice since 1947

@roscomeon3965

Жыл бұрын

Lol. Are you for real ? On drugs or medication ? A mental infirmity ? Or you must have been in rip van winkle land for the decades preceeding 1999.

@kevinlongman007

Жыл бұрын

Why should hereditary peers have a say in the laws of the land due soley to the fact they were born?! The Royal peers rarely, if ever, attended debates and votes in the Lords anyway. Blair was right to abolish them and he should have gone further and made the upper chamber fully elected.

PRINCE ANDREW COULD HAVE SPENT HIS LIFE BETTER, AS A STAGE ACTOR, OR A MOVIE STAR, INSTEAD OF, WITH WOMEN, OR CHASING AFTER THEM.

@josealmeida76

3 жыл бұрын

Nevertheless, as a stage actor or a movie star, he could have spent his life with or chasing women. The problem is that he chased very young women, suspected to be minors, used in sex trafficking and prostitution against their will.

where do you get your videos from? what source

Back in 1987 Andrew had the world at his feet. Why doesn’t he appear to have the respect afforded to him back then. With all due respect.

@mscott3918

6 жыл бұрын

Millie Vanilli Because he hasn't always behaved appropriately. Too many questions about his business contacts and not careful with his personal contacts.

@michaelhope8899

6 жыл бұрын

The problem isn't that he isn't being given the respect he 'deserves'. The problem is that he KNOWS he still has the world at his feet; he is too pompous. His view is 'I can do this, so sod everyone else' whilst the other royals will think 'I can do this, but how will others perceive this? Lets ask the right people'

@erzsebetnilsson580

6 жыл бұрын

HE DID NOT THAN, HE DID MUCH EARLIER DURING 80-85.... HE THAN ENJOYED THE ARMY AND HE DID THE RIGHT THING WITH THAT HE WAS NOT THE MEDIA's FOOL ANY MORE HE DID THE RIGHT THING.

@erzsebetnilsson580

5 жыл бұрын

The love which made him to do be that, ended and ONLY THE HYSTERIA WHO DESTROYED HIM IS STILL LEFT AND TRY EVERY YEAR A WEDDING

@AB-et6nj

Жыл бұрын

Epstein

Anyone know why he bowed and sat three times?

@Sden20307

3 жыл бұрын

For each section he was introduced to

@mathbau

3 жыл бұрын

@@Sden20307 Actually no. Even if you are not bestowed 3 titles, you still do it three times. See for e.g. the introduction of Lord Jenkins: kzread.info/dash/bejne/a6aZtrxuaKrbXZs.html

@davidwaddington9414

2 жыл бұрын

haemorroids.

@moonhead9760

2 жыл бұрын

His hemmoroids were playing up that day 👲🏽🤡

@JohanOliveire

Жыл бұрын

@@mathbau He said "section", not "title, "which makes me think Government, opposition and cross-benchers.

prince andrew is the only royal who does not have his full documentary uploaded on youtube, what's up with that?

@alexm566

2 жыл бұрын

we now know why

Why do they not read all three titles together? Also, are the introductions of the others recorded?

@paulharding150

4 жыл бұрын

All introductions are recorded, most are highly unlikely to be on KZread though (but here's one kzread.info/dash/bejne/pmyZuLazgri8hNI.html) fine the dates in Lords Hansard (introductions are done at the start of a day's sittings, probably no more than an average of 20 per year however) and then view the footage on parliament.tv

@jimduffy7199

Жыл бұрын

Because they are in different peerages (Scottish and United Kingdom), not all in one. Each appointment is separate.

@gidzmobug2323

Жыл бұрын

@@jimduffy7199 Interesting! I had not realized that

@harrygall8454

Жыл бұрын

One of the cocky the rudest royal family shameful then and know

@JohanOliveire

Жыл бұрын

All were read at once. There were two (sets of) letters: one advising the House of the three appointments, and the other advising him personally.

Who is on the woolsack?

@mscott3918

6 жыл бұрын

Ryan Frederick Lord Hailsham

@rivenoak

Жыл бұрын

@@mscott3918 afaik Quintin Hogg Baron Hailsham of Marylebone

Prince Andrew i need your help and the houses of Lord the pencil of Lords house i have at home

Baron Killyleagh - is not pronounced 'Killy - LEE" - rather it is pronounced "Killy - LAY"

and thoroughly well deserved and earned too !

@davidwaddington9414

2 жыл бұрын

would you explain what you mean please ?

@malcolm9994

2 жыл бұрын

@@davidwaddington9414 Well he's such a credit to the nation. A fine upstanding fellow and an example for us all so follow.

@adam4757

2 жыл бұрын

This comment hasn't aged well

@malcolm9994

2 жыл бұрын

@@adam4757 What makes you say that ?

@adam4757

2 жыл бұрын

@@malcolm9994 He is going to court over rape allegations

So Edward was never introduced to the Lords after he got his titles?

@jesusthroughmary

3 жыл бұрын

He got married only a few months before the passage of the House of Lords Act 1999 (an atrocious law btw), so he was barred from the Lords before he would have been introduced the following year. Andrew was married in July 1986 and wasn't introduced to the Lords until February 1987.

@gidzmobug2323

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesusthroughmary So Charles and Andrew were introduced to the Lord's, but Edward was not? And what about William and Harry?

@jesusthroughmary

3 жыл бұрын

@@gidzmobug2323 Correct - Charles and Andrew were, Edward was not. William and Harry were not. Andrew was the last royal duke to be seated in the Lords.

@gidzmobug2323

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesusthroughmary so no more Royal Dukes to the Lords?

@jesusthroughmary

3 жыл бұрын

@@gidzmobug2323 Nope.

Doing next drama for king

Amusing how many comments here wanted to keep the hereditary peers and hate Tony Blair for taking them out, but these same people never commented on how David Cameron also packed the Lords with his own set of cronies. As much as I enjoyed watching this, I hope the Lords would become similar to Australia's Senate. But the Commons should be reformed while that's being done.

@notnotadev

2 жыл бұрын

not to be political but i think it would be better for parliament to become unicameral like new zealand, though i do like the house of lords

@Myndir

2 жыл бұрын

Of course Cameron packed it with cronies. That's also partly Blair's fault: he made a system almost designed for corruption.

Its shit that us Brits allowed Labour to kick out hereditary peers. This tradition was amazing and having Royal Princes take their seat even if they never voted or spoke on political issues was quite something. It would have been amazing to see Prince Edward now Duke of Edinburgh take his seat along with Prince William and Prince Harry.

@afghanskull7782

3 ай бұрын

Well I mean the whole kid loving thing was a bit of a barrier

GOOD MOVE of You Prince ... i wish the house of Lord still had a power you are involved here. i love the duke of Kent but NOT AND NEVER HIS WIFE

@markitsche987

4 жыл бұрын

What is wrong with his wife, if I may ask?

@gidzmobug2323

3 жыл бұрын

@@markitsche987 A good question. Not a doggone thing wrong with the Duchess. Seems like she is a very nice lady.

@joelskelley2625

3 жыл бұрын

I’m assuming this commenter doesn’t like those of the catholic persuasion

@gidzmobug2323

Жыл бұрын

@Chelle Davidson Perhaps. It is usually Princess Michael who comes in for criticism.

@gidzmobug2323

Жыл бұрын

​@@joelskelley2625 The Duchess did not convert to the Roman Church until well after her marriage.

Wasn't this an investiture ceremony? He was granted his title and rank, Baron, Earl and Duke. As an American, I think it was a mistake to do away with the sitting of the hereditary peers. It wiped away centuries of tradition. There is something to be said for the old upper house.

@liawatson5789

5 жыл бұрын

hereditary peers are unelected. democracy trumps tradition.

@marahbadrian

5 жыл бұрын

@@liawatson5789 a wise man once said "tradition is the democracy of the dead"

@paulcorrea1613

4 жыл бұрын

@@liawatson5789 Democracy elected Hitler.

@lukedoherty8062

4 жыл бұрын

Rhiannon Williams you’re forgetting the fact the lord are still unelected. The largest unelected chamber behind the Chinese National Congress.

@francom1499

3 жыл бұрын

@@lukedoherty8062 yes but the issue with democracy is thst the power comes and can be taken by the people, thats why we need a counter house that does not concede to that

Why isn't Andrew in prison ?..let's think

@ObeyjusticeChiguta18

5 жыл бұрын

John Hetherington ok, why ?

@spittingimageclips3485

4 жыл бұрын

Because he hasn't been convicted in a court of law.

@erzsebetnilsson580

4 жыл бұрын

is Andrew in there ?

@pokemonmaster5598

4 жыл бұрын

Good question. Pedophiles should go to prison

@morganmcmurdo8697

3 жыл бұрын

Because the courts need evidence which no one has hence why he isn’t in prison. You can’t imprison someone just because of accusations?

Congratulations was in order during the year of our Lord, 1987. Congratulations to you your RH Duke of York, Earl of Inverness, Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward. Magnificent! 👏👏👏

And now it's "Payback Peanut" time :)

Nm

中文翻譯

God blesses all British royal family.....

What a sick joke the modern royals have made of a once-proud country...

Okay what percent of the Lords at that time do you all figure was inbred? 30? 40? 60? Remember there were nearly 1000 hereditary peers at this point.

My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen, it's "Peanut" time lol :)

1999 get out house of lords

Archaic....

@GodisMyNo1

Жыл бұрын

That affects you how?

He is an extremely intelligent man.

@moonhead9760

2 жыл бұрын

LMMFAO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡

@AB-et6nj

Жыл бұрын

Epstein thought so too

@gracerajah8972

Жыл бұрын

Changed my mind !

Was he sponsored by Lord Jeffrey de Epsteighne?

Watching this… makes me”nauseated” .. he was probably already visiting Epstein on his private island

...when you consider 'royalty' was created at a time when people thought the world was flat, you get an idea how ridiculous this over the top circus is and how pathetic people are, if they still believe kings and queens serve any purpose today.

@OldSkoolUncleChris

Жыл бұрын

The greeks knew world was round its a myth u creten

Ministry of silly walks stuff

When did he get introduced to Epstein?

So corny !

LUDICROUS NON - SENSE ‼️

I do think to myself when I watch stuff like this that every person in that room including Andrew and the guy making the speech are probably thinking the same thing as I would think if I were in that room - That being “What a load of shit this is, please get me out of here quick” lol. That’s exactly what I’d be thinking even if I was the queen.

House of lords should be disbanded.

They are so ridiculous in this day and age.

@francom1499

3 жыл бұрын

How so?

@GodisMyNo1

Жыл бұрын

You must be american. Royals are not more ridiculous than the presidents of your country

this is the best comedy of human beings has ever been produced in history with a cast of thousands elderly clowns so funny and ridiculous what a stupid show.

GET RID OF THE HOUSE OG LORDS

@weiyouzeng1189

5 жыл бұрын

I personally think reforming it would be a better idea than abolishing it altogether.

@cherryberry7024

4 жыл бұрын

ten years of austerity and still in the poor house thanks to these greedy unelected peers .paid five hundred pound plus expensers just to clock in have a nice lunch then go home. how bloody stupid are the british people?.

@francom1499

3 жыл бұрын

@@cherryberry7024 they actually do stuff you know and also hardly anybody turns up when its in session

@cherryberry7024

3 жыл бұрын

@TheRenaissanceman65 i beg your pardon !!! i am one i know all .!.! i yield the whip sir !!!!

@cherryberry7024

3 жыл бұрын

@TheRenaissanceman65 me silly sir !! i have been called a lot of things but silly is not one of them !! love &peace

im sorry i cant stop laughing at the wigs. like uh its not 1776 anymore, we dont wear those anymore.

@luxio369

2 жыл бұрын

it is not compulsory to say something, especially if we don’t have nothing to say

All your hard earned taxes pay for this ! . Just think about that for a minute .