You could curse the darkness, but you chose lighting candles. Thank you, Anton. You ARE a wonderful person.

@spvillano

9 ай бұрын

I'll curse the darkness by turning on the light.

@iAmNothingness

9 ай бұрын

Just balance the fine line. Without darkness, light can be blinding and damaging. Without light there would be nothing to be discovered.

@thefuppits

9 ай бұрын

I'm afraid of the light you know. And, because you're part of the light, I'm afraid of you too.

@watsonrangi6236

9 ай бұрын

Here, Here!!!!

@Gunth0r

9 ай бұрын

@@iAmNothingness You mean like... Yin and Yang? :D

So, in today's news, generalized press completely misinterpret scientific experiment and report entirely made up news about a revolutionary discovery. Next: ice is cold. 🤣 Thankfully, we have people like Anton that help in divulging actual scientific facts and clear up misunderstanding caused by those superficial journalists, in a very clear and understandable manner. Always very interesting to listen to him.

@costrio

9 ай бұрын

The "scientists" and "experts" in the media today are "the scientific consensus," maybe? I think consensus means opinion, seeking to generate societal "norms." "Just the facts, ma'am...just the facts." -- Sgt Joe Friday of "Dragnet"

@neverusingthisagain2

9 ай бұрын

People wonder why people dont believe the news or trust the science. And when this is the science . Yep.

@Beatsy

9 ай бұрын

Sorry, "ice is cold" doesn't fit the mainstream narrative. More like - "scientists terrified by discovery of ice getting warmer" (i.e. ice melts). Simplify, then exaggerate, as always.

@Kayvoyager

9 ай бұрын

The media lost credibility due to chase of extraordinary and fabulous in detriment of reporting the facts. It's same almost in all the countries.

@rhumbatron2912

9 ай бұрын

Weird that yin and yang would be thought to be an "image" of entangled "atoms"? The concept seems inverted from entanglement as particles are not mirrored by each other or polarized but acting in tandem or a matched set, I don't think there is a right and left side or a north and south, but I might be wrong. Even on the basic idea of entanglement it doesn't fit the concept of yin and yang which is more polarity. We have plenty of yins and yangs already i don't know why entanglement has to have this quality as well except people think they feel it when they meditate or dream😃.

TL:DR - Scientists made a quantum DSLR, decided to take a picture of a Ying Yang, and the media was surprised it printed out a Ying Yang. Now the pro-gamer move would be for the scientists to take a picture of Surprised Pikachu meme.

@HIRAMECLARKEHOPS

7 күн бұрын

Ying Yang 😂

@ekojar3047

4 күн бұрын

I vote yes

When I originally saw this "science news" story, I rolled my eyes. An Actual photo or image of a particle would mean that the location and the velocity of the particle were both precisely known at the same time, which according to the laws of physics is impossible. For non-quantum physicist readers, this is why the article is bullshit: A particle is merely a wave function before it is observed. It is in a quantum state of superposition between a particle and a wave which means it exists both in two places at once and at no place at all. A wave function is a mathematical probability, the math states that if the velocity of a wave function is known, it's position can not be known and when it's position is known, it's velocity cannot be known, this is a mathematical fact. So, when one of the two mathematical figures is unknown, the equation can not be reduced in order to know the exact position of the wave function. A wave function is not a particle. When the particle interacts with the real universe, the wave function collapses into a particle, but before it collapses, it is just a theoretical possibility. I know this sounds like a bunch of gobltygook but the quantum world does not interact with the normal macro universe using the same rules that the macro world does. Einstein's theory of relativity reveals many of the rules and many of these "rules" of quantum physics are still being discovered as physicists continue to study and build quantum computers and operate the different particle accelerators across the world.

@jordanfelts7482

9 ай бұрын

For now

@user-ze3lw6nl7z

9 ай бұрын

I am in agreement with @jordanfelts182 "for now" , just as laws are made to be broken physical laws are made to be disproven and the things that we as the general public who take some interest in scientific advancements are being allowed to discover are bending the laws of physics to there breaking point. Example, search Ted talk camera taking femtoframes per second. Allowing us to watch as light penetrates darkness one femto frame at a time and that is a fairly old Ted talk. Where we are now is anyone's guess.

@laxyajena4735

9 ай бұрын

Well like they say nothing is impossible

@Unknown_Random_Guy

9 ай бұрын

@laxyajena4735 A particle is merely a wave function before it is observed. It is in a quantum state of superposition between a particle and a wave which means it exists both in two places at once and at no place at all. A wave function is a mathematical probability, the math states that if the velocity of a wave function is known, it's position can not be known and when it's position is known, it's velocity cannot be known, this is a mathematical fact. So, when one of the two mathematical figures is unknown, the equation can not be reduced in order to know the exact position of the wave function. A wave function is not a particle. When the particle interacts with the real universe, the wave function collapses into a particle, but before it collapses, it is just a theoretical possibility. I know this sounds like a bunch of gobltygook but the quantum world does not interact with the normal macro universe using the same rules.

@mrs.jennifer3339

4 ай бұрын

WOW... 😲 SO WELL PUT. EMBARRASSED TO SAY😶IT KINDA HURTS MY BRAIN A LIL💫🧠😖💫 TO EVEN CONTEMPLATE, THE EXACT EXPLANATION, YOU ARE TRYING TO EXPLAIN...???☝️🤓 😒... ⚛️🧐⚛️... 🤔👀...🤦 🙅 🤷 EXCELLENT!!! 👏 🙂 LOL😉 👍

For anyone still confused, what he's basically saying is that it's a fancy photograph of a literal physical object.

@better.better

9 ай бұрын

you forgot to put TLDR at the front of it

@better.better

9 ай бұрын

and actually yeah it's a LITERAL photograph

@GIRGHGH

9 ай бұрын

This isn't a tldr, it's a fasc. It's for people who watched the video

@Kyle-nm1kh

9 ай бұрын

I took a nap through it. Care to explain what I missed? I'm a Taoist btw and this looks like fake news. The Tao isn't about hot and cold and all the opposites either, it's about balance of all things and connection.

@Millstone1985

9 ай бұрын

@@Kyle-nm1kh It is a video about debunking fake news that spread in response to real news, by explaining what the original was about.

Thank goodness for you, Anton. You're doing a great service to the public for explaining when the media gets science wrong. I've been watching your videos for ages, and your content never disappoints.

@spvillano

9 ай бұрын

It's gotten so bad, I don't even open such stories if they show up in the news and I don't waste my time with most antisocial media at all. I miss the old days, when a reporter didn't understand something, they asked one of the organization's science consultants about it. Now, to be "lean and mean", they fired all of those consultants and the reporters just make up bullshit as they go along, generating mistrust in science and the media along the way.

@megamushroom

9 ай бұрын

@@spvillano oh...

@VikingTeddy

9 ай бұрын

Not just science, it's everything. Once I started studying history, I quickly realised that the media has pretty much created a completely fictional past. I've heard similar complaints from different proffessions. Once you become familiar with a subject, you notice that the media will constantly get things wrong. We can't believe anything the media reports about a spesific field without a bag of salt :(

@VikingTeddy

9 ай бұрын

​@@spvillanoHate to tell you, but it's always been like this. Reporters if yesterday didn't consult with proffessionals any more than today. It's just a lot more egregious and fast paced nowadays. They did however have to at least do a bare minimum of work on an article. Nowadays they can just copy from eachother in an endless game of broken telephone.

It's actually pretty rare to see Anton being that mad. Now imagine how mad these researchers have been over the past week.

@SkyfishArt

9 ай бұрын

but they got sooo much publicity for it though

@olencone4005

9 ай бұрын

@@SkyfishArt Not all publicity is good publicity tho... this is the sort that will just aggravate them with woo questions when they're trying to do or discuss real work :(

@whatdamath

9 ай бұрын

I'm not mad. It's tonsillitis

@jaizo_

9 ай бұрын

@@whatdamath "I'm not mad, I have tonsillitis" is so funny

@catpoke9557

9 ай бұрын

These researchers will probably get some loser going "look how bad scientists are and how they lie, they claimed to photograph quantum entanglement which is physically impossible to photograph!" because pseudoscientists always claim the opinion of the pop science article writers are the opinion of scientists. I feel bad thinking about them needing to deal with that

I was actually waiting for you to post this one. Thank you so much for “cleaning up” this mess.

TY Anton for taking the time to show us another example of erudite journalists misrepresenting science.

@raylopez99

9 ай бұрын

Erh, you dyke what? reported bro... and don't diss CNN!

@satanicmicrochipv5656

9 ай бұрын

The look on Anton's face cracked me up. SCIENCE!!!

@nawtmyrealnamelol

9 ай бұрын

this is why science communicators like anton are so important. the general public needs people who understand the science well enough to accurately convey it for everyone else

@lichtabendlenz4866

9 ай бұрын

Its still the yin and yang

@lichtabendlenz4866

9 ай бұрын

@@nawtmyrealnamelol We still dont live in anatheist universe sorry bro look ufos Anton is wrong with that he is listining to Mick West lol

Hey Anton, just remember, you can't fix stupid, especially when it's intentional. 😂 Keep being wonderful!

The media is sometimes careless, sometimes stupid, and sometimes outright lying! We are fortunate to have Anton to set the record straight for anyone who cares. We are also fortunate that we still have a free enough media to support legitimate and factual information. Thanks again, Anton, for your contributions to science education.

@user-ov1lx9yu8y

9 ай бұрын

Signs of education? 😂🎉

@PChazman1

9 ай бұрын

What do you mean "sometimes"?😂😂😂😂

@johnnylego807

9 ай бұрын

How many other things do you think they outright lie about if they lie about the small things? All food for thought.

THANK YOU, I've been waiting on a proper explantion of the paper without clickbait headlines. Anton is truly Lawful Good.

Thank you for explaining this! I did not have the time to read more about this and the truth is actually more fascinating than the click bait headlines. 👁️😸

@whatdamath

9 ай бұрын

Thank you so much!

@Skurian_krotesk

9 ай бұрын

Right?! The fact that we have developed short time ghost imageing is way more impressive than seing partical that happen to take on a certain shape.

How do you keep up with ALL of the science ALL of the time? Mind. Blown!

@BboyKeny

9 ай бұрын

I imagine he goes through journals and science news sites as his daily information consumption. So like watching the news everyday but with only science.

@paskudne

9 ай бұрын

@@BboyKeny and healthier for mind

@infinitemonkey917

9 ай бұрын

If you subscribe to free science news sites you will get articles on most of the same stuff. Also, it's his job.

@shaqman8649

9 ай бұрын

@@acmhfmggru the topics may be from the front page of that subreddit, but his content isn't regurgitated bc he does his research

@EJ_D._Kidd

9 ай бұрын

Redditors always gatta complain about other people using reddit

After seeing a few viral videos on this exact image. I decided to read the paper and was very confused at how that image represented entangled particles. Thank you for clearing that up.

Very good explanation, thanks. I am sure those researchers were (not) completely unaware of how their presentation would be interpreted and widely disseminated.

Thank You, Anton!! I had a suspicion that your explanation was in fact what had happened. When I read the paper on this, the fact that the image was of a yin/yang symbol really had me confused as to why that particular image was used. Now I know!!

I think it's amazing that we have Anton to share these with . I learn so much from your videos, thank you wonderful anton

Very good work Anton! Thank you for clearing this up for me personally I was very confused as to why the image would look like that, you make it actually make sense so again thank you!

thanks god they chose yin and yang rather than a swastika as their spiritual sign.

I love how every time i open KZread you post a new video either a couple of minutes prior or this time 33 seconds before opening the app

Thanks Anton. I saw that image with various confused headlines many times. I didn't even bother reading those articles, as I knew they wouldn't provide any insight into the actual paper.

@DrachenGothik666

9 ай бұрын

The word you're looking for is "insight", not incite. "Incite" means "to cause".

@hamjudo

9 ай бұрын

@@acmhfmggru I wasn't in a hurry. Far too often the paper is locked behind a paywall. I am retired, so I don't have instant access to research papers through an employer. I am fortunate to have access at all through local libraries, but that is a cumbersome process.

Great job undoing some misinformation. I've seen that image in my news feed but haven't had a chance to read the articles yet. I'm so glad I saw your video on this before wasting time on those articles!

It's not quite like "altering one particle alters the other". It's correlation. If we don't collapse one of them and force its spin to be left if polarity was in other axis like up, then we basically break the entanglement. An entanglement is a resulting wave, a system we can't see like the original ones but can filter and that's how we get the components. The explanation about the holograms is very good. Quantum tunneling Anton. Talk about how many applications does that quantum effect has.

@artistana523

9 ай бұрын

Thank you for this clarification it actually helped me visualize it even better

I’ve never seen this technique before and honestly it’s quite ingenious. I’ve also never heard of quantum encryption, but that too is something that seems awesome. The future is indeed quantum and with all the growth in research regarding quantum techniques we get more chances of noticing inconsistencies in our theories and moving closer to a theory of everything.

@spvillano

9 ай бұрын

I've not heard of this specific technique, but as Anton said, it's derived from a very similar one. Just a bit of refinement via a bit of alteration in the setup, which made the entire thing more efficient. Quantum encryption I've heard a lot about, but I can't discuss it, due to a rather seriously fanged NDA.

Anton is one of my fav youtubers out there. I pray for you and your family Anton. Keep doing what you love cus many of us love what you do

@whatdamath

9 ай бұрын

I appreciate that

Thanks Anton! I really appreciate how you cut through the BS and just give us the real science!

Thank you so much, Anton. As soon as I wanted to share that image, I had doubts, I was so glad to see your video explaining what the image is actually.

😱 oh no! Something got misinterpreted on the internet! How could this have happened!? 🙄 Thanks for clarifying this. Never heard if this before you mentioned it.

I hadn't heard about this here in the middle of Montana but the colorized image is interpretative. The eye of Sauron would have been insane.

I'm not a bright person and barely understand technical stuff here but I think "Oh so it just because someone put Yin and Yang picture and basically created that results isn't it?" immediately after you finished first explanation video about that tool reconstruct lambda image, you did a very great explanation even for dummies like me, big thanks.

Am so glad to see so many people following your channel, this gives me hope for the world

Well...that's a bummer. I was hoping there was a "zen" side to the universe. Still...someone has to bust their chops for misleading representation of the quantum entanglement...nicely done Anton...and thanks for the mini-tutorial while you're at it. 🤗

@Nixdigo

9 ай бұрын

There is. For example you're made from material of dead stars, old TV static was the cosmic background radiation. A cosmic ray broke super Mario 64 speedrunning. Humans discovered plasma before electricity. Everything is all connected.

@off6848

9 ай бұрын

@@Nixdigo absurd fantasies

@ThePowerLover

9 ай бұрын

@@off6848What?

@off6848

9 ай бұрын

@@ThePowerLover All of the words. “You’re made of stars” pretty sure stars came after the materials that make them up so it’s a trivial claim because it’s just saying “you and stars are made of materials” yeah and so is literally everything else, it’s a dramatic statement that doesn’t mean anything.

@hedgehog3180

9 ай бұрын

@@off6848 All elements heavier than Lithium have to be created in stars, and all elements heavier than Iron can only be created during a Supernova or when two neutron stars collide. It is just the literal truth that almost all the matter we see on Earth comes from dead stars.

Thank you so much Anton, for looking out for our potential confusion & explaining it so much better. I love your content my friend. Thank you for the awesome information & helping us understand it. 👊

They could have taken a picture of a wonderfully entangled Anton! ;-) Many thanks for your explanation! (an entangled Anton, that sounds weird, let's take a picture of a wonderful person!)

I was literally waiting your comment on this. You became my reference for quality in those fields. Thank you. God bless you. You are really The wonderful Person.

How on earth do you take a photo of a single photon?! 🙄

@BurritoEl

9 ай бұрын

.

@MarloTheBlueberry

9 ай бұрын

You don't 🙄

@jesserutt7413

9 ай бұрын

@@BurritoEl😂

@antonsidko2993

9 ай бұрын

It's another topic, but if you would to catch photons there are photomatrixes and photomultipliers.

@BurritoEl

9 ай бұрын

@@jesserutt7413 Our team just managed to capture a rare photo of two entangled photons! Actual photo ----> :

Really fascinating. Always amazing to see quantum effects in practical applications!

Those bits about the personal touch add a lot to the videos Anton. Keep adding them. A little humor is always appreciated!

Thank you, this is SUPER interesting and i like your clean style

As minimunute man has said several times, just because it looks like something doesn't mean it actually is. This isn't the first or last time people will misrepresent the findings of a study.

@bloodleader5

9 ай бұрын

Why are you quoting that rich boy internet "expert" as a source? You don't need a source for an intuitively true statement. Think critically and stop relying on authority figures for literally everything.

Hi Anton! My impression from the research paper is that they were taking images of quantum entangled states (rather than of other objects via ghost imaging) using a new variant of quantum state tomography. This is where you prepare hundreds of the same quantum state and measure all of them to determine the wavefunction of the system via probability analysis. However, it is still true that the Yin Yang symbol is misleading. As the article says, "the two-photon wavefunction strongly depends on the shape of the pump laser used to induce the down-conversion process". They formed a pump in the shape of the Yin-Yang symbol and the photon wavefunction was essentially molded into that shape. They then performed tomography on that molded quantum state using their method, and that's what the image was.

@bepamungkas

9 ай бұрын

That quote is for the "old" SPDC-based method, and one of the reason why it took so long to do imaging. To quote from the elaboration improved method "The core idea lies in assuming the SPDC state induced by a plane wave as known, and in superimposing this state with the unknown biphoton state..." "Remarkably, we show how, from a simple measurement, one can retrieve information about two-photon states in arbitrary spatial mode bases without the efficiency and alignment issues that affect previously implemented projective characterization techniques" They way I understand it, they improve the processing by introducing "unknown" pump that will get scattered by the imaged object. Which result then later combined with the "known" pump to reconstruct the image faster by reducing spatial analysis time.

I'm so happy you explained this. I saw how it went viral and knew that it couldn't be what people were saying, but I couldn't follow the science enough to understand what was actually done.

I understood exactly what you were saying. In other words, you made it exceptionally clear for almost anyone to understand, TY

I noticed this too. I wonder if the authors did this on purpose because they knew it would get attention lol.

@quinnbeasley94

9 ай бұрын

That's cooperate media for you.

@moustachio05

9 ай бұрын

​@@quinnbeasley94*Corporate

@infinitemonkey917

9 ай бұрын

People also love them some quantum woo. The Tao of Physics was a huge seller.

thank you for informing us with a bit of reality! I really love the eye of sauron idea by the way! Maybe that's A strategy to utilize? trolling the public and sensationalist media by providing low hanging fruit that would get gulped down without shame, but is easily verified and corrected by the science community? xD nah, perhaps a bit too entertaining of an idea.. but one can dream... Keep up the good stuff like usual!

Thank you again Anton! this quickly clears up the headlines I've been dismissing anyway, as they all seemed to be coming from uneducated sources. Anton Rocks!!! ☮

I usually chatter at dinner about various findings in the quantum domain. But this one I didn't because alarm bells were going off like crazy with the way it was being reported, and mainly, the way the object appeared. I'm glad I held off, and I really appreciate you solving the mystery! *NOW* I have a story to tell at the table!

I was hoping that you would do that at the end. Thank you.😂 Whenever it comes to new discoveries I always wait until you cover the subject because I know I'm going to get a video that is well-researched and very well-presented.

Thank you! I feel that this explanation will be used extensively next years :')

Thank you, I was waiting for this episode so much, saw the photo, saw articles, and none explained what it was about, just said it is Yin&Yang quantum photon entanglement. And then I just waited for you to make it clearn. Thank you Anton!!!

Much appreciated. I was very skeptical about the news articles, I couldn't understand how entanglement itself could even be visualized, but I was still curious about it.

When I saw this I was a little suspicious about how they were able to create a rather sophisticated image from two PHOTONS. Thanks Anton for clearing that up! 😊

This was something I saw on phys org and did a double take. I had to look through the article carefully and then to the source paper as I quickly grew suspicious that they were displaying an imaging/analysis technique that produced the taijitu - not that some field potentials were the taijitu. The way the picture was framed within the headline and intro paragraph, they were really banking on the idea that entanglement had been photographed and it was as prophesied in the yin-yang. Of course... those who know their history know that the earlier depiction of the taiji was as a spiral.

@off6848

9 ай бұрын

There is a field potential that mathematically is a yin yang its called John Mackens OMparticle soliton its just like a spinning yet standing wave function but imagine the Yin is a peak and the Yang is a valley in terms of the longitudinal amplitude

Great video thanks for taking the time 🎁

You're the only source I've seen so far on this that isn't trying to mislead in some way that the ying yang is the shape/shadow of quantum entanglement. Thank you, wonderful Anton!

Anton busting mainstream narratives all over the place 👊

Ah yes, a picture of photons that's measured in "mm", seems legit 😂 I love these kinds of explanation videos because they're both hilarious and they reaffirm the quality of my news sources, since this kind of viral nonsense never reaches me unless it's a "factcheck" article similar to your videos.

@castonyoung7514

9 ай бұрын

When I first looked at it I thought it said "nm". I would assume most people did too (until you see it full-screen).

I'm glad that I don't quit researching something when I first get an impression. I was originally deceived but kept looking till I found out it was a picture of a picture. Thank you for the beautiful explanation

Thanks Anton. As a Taoist I was one of those feeling those old Taoist had some power insights. I was also secretly hoping you’d set it all straight.

If the Media blew the yin-yang symbol out of proportion, imagine what ruckus it would cause if they sent an image of a cat! 😸

I like this. Still remaining as professional as possible when we're out here acting like children over a ying-yang. 😂😂😂 No Anton, you are the wonderful person. You truly are.

@virgobro2025

9 ай бұрын

You are deliberately misinterpretating it.

@WarkWarbly

9 ай бұрын

@@virgobro2025 Yup.

First time viewer, you earned my sub! Great indepth explanation

Lol thank you for this, I saw the articles and was like "no way" but wasn't able to find someone explaining it till now.

Hi. Thank you for continuing to upload science things, I love checking in from time to time ☺️

If I had to try to correct another misinformed individual saying that ying-yang has been found at a quantum level, I may go bald pulling my hair out. Now I can just share this video😊

@GlazeonthewickeR

9 ай бұрын

Lol ego is a hell of a drug

@oirampeceda2409

9 ай бұрын

It's all over the place with the ancient Indian sites claiming validation, because they claim that it was them who taught the Chinese that symbol 12,000 years ago, blah, blah, blah...and now we know.

Mannn, I really wanted this to be true, but thank you for clearing it up, I genuinely feel educated after this! great work as usual!

yin yag is simple way to explain in layman terms is how quantum entangled photons spin...one photon do negative charge while other one does positive charge...just like electrons moves to produce a diffusion field on your led screen, that means they can produce any image from the air and space....hologram application tech gonna love this findings

I missed this story. I expect Sabine will debunk it too.

These scientist showed social understanding at Sheldonian level. They had to be aware that this Yin Yang picture would be a "money shot". They failed to explain their paper in laimen terms, and they should know that writing a press release and scientific summary are not same thing. Great explanation, Anton !

thank you, this very important I hope your vedio goes viral as well but if you cut some shorts out of it it will reach even more people

God Bless you for clarity, on what you are talking about and on something else!

I cannot like this video enough times!

FIRST. YOU DA MAN ANTON. YOU NEVER CEASE TO IMPRESS. Best science channel by far and I'm proud to be a part of it

@Aerialyn

9 ай бұрын

Wait I commented before you

A few more points in Anton’s charisma stats. Keep leveling up Anton!

Fantastic explanation and thank you for doing this video!

It's rare to see such disappointment from Anton

@ltandrepants

9 ай бұрын

Bad sentence if you are trying to compliment him

@gmunny46

9 ай бұрын

@@ltandrepants it's rare to see him express disappointment like this

When you finally decide to get rid of particles and understand that you are dealing with spherical harmonics. quantum entanglement will make a lot more sense

@Noooiiiissseee

9 ай бұрын

Explain what you mean.

@olencone4005

9 ай бұрын

@@Noooiiiissseee It's just meaningless technobabble. A great example of what Anton is annoyed with in this video.

Ah yes. Saw this last week, felt it was odd, then decided to wait for Anton to save the day! Thank you, good sir.

thank you i was waiting for your video on this!!

Thanks for clearing that up.

I was skeptical when first reading these "news" articles that that was actually visually captured entanglement, and now you've confirmed my suspicions. Thank you!

You channel has been invaluable when it comes to me setting people at work who peddle misunderstood garbage straight with their facts

You put a lot of knowledge bricks into your video. Building an old fashiond Photo-camera was great, back in the shool day´s.

When i sawit i knew id have to waiaat for you to make a video💯💯

I’ve been working for weeks. I missed this news anyway. But thanks for the info!!!

So informative! Thank you so much!

This is a very simple and clear explanation. Thanks

I glanced at the original article, quickly saw that what they were saying was nonsense, and so didn't bother to read it. Glad that that was the right call.

Thank you Anton. I had not seen the stories about this before you published. I guess I just don't read a lot of the media "scientific" press releases out there. Your post will cause less people to be misinformed. If only we could reach the rest of the masses before some person assigned into the science beat when they really wanted to do fashion posts again!.

Thanks for clearing it up. I was so confused by this.

THANK YOU! For addressing and correcting! Thank you, thank you, thank you! ❤

Nice job. Unfortunately, the short video on ghost imaging is also misrepresenting the process of generating entangled photons. You cannot simply split a laser beam to generate entangled photons. In general, you need a nonlinear process such as spontaneous parametric down conversion. This creates two red photons from a single blue photon. The photons are entangled due to the process respecting conservation laws. Another interesting fact about ghost imaging; it is essentially the same process used in the delayed choice quantum eraser experiments.

Tanks, you are doing a grate mission. Thanks

You deserve a medal for sorting this out, Anton. Thanks.

I couldn't wait for Anton's intake on this , thank you sir

The ending makes this deserve to comments. May this channel bring in billions of dollars and an equal yet impossibly unquantifiable amount of education.

This is exactly what i needed while I was trying to make sense of all of it 😂 So turns out it just didn't make sense. Thank you Anton 🙌🏻❤️

Thank you so much for this video. When I saw this image and story I was so confused and was thinking there is no way that picture makes sense.

Aha! I had missed that image and story. For an instant, when I saw your announcement, I immediately thought “Aha!”. Alas it was not aha but mhwah😒. Good explanation, as always. A pity though, wouldn’t that have been mindblowing 😯 🙋🏻‍♂️